Balloon-assisted Coiling Research Articles

Radiation dose analysis in interventional neuroradiology of unruptured aneurysm cases

This study aimed to evaluate the radiation doses (peak skin dose (PSD) and bilateral lens dose) for each interventional neuroradiology procedure. A direct measurement system consisting of small radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter chips and a dosimetry cap made of thin stretchable polyester was used for radiation dosimetry. The mean PSDs for each procedure were 1565 ± 590 mGy (simple technique coil embolization (STCE) cases), 1851 ± 825 mGy (balloon-assisted coil embolization (BACE) cases), 2583 ± 967 mGy (stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) cases), 1690 ± 597 mGy (simple flow-diverter stenting (FDS) cases), and 2214 ± 726 mGy (FDS + coiling cases). The mean PSD was higher in SACE cases than in STCE, BACE, and simple FDS cases. Moreover, the PSD exceeded 2000 mGy and 3000 mGy in 46 (67.6%) and 19 (27.9%) SACE cases, respectively. The left lens doses for each procedure were 126 ± 111 mGy (STCE cases), 163 ± 152 mGy (BACE cases), 184 ± 148 mGy (SACE cases), 144 ± 60 mGy (simple FDS cases), and 242 ± 178 mGy (FDS + coiling cases). The left lens dose in SACE cases was higher than that in STCE cases and exceeded 500 mGy in 3 (4.4%) patients. In FDS + coiling cases, the mean PSD and left lens dose were 2214 ± 726 mGy and 242 ± 178 mGy, respectively. The left lens dose was higher than that in the STCE and BACE cases, with two (15.4%) patients receiving doses >500 mGy in FDS + coiling cases. The detailed data obtained in this study are expected to contribute to the promotion of radiation dose optimization.

Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Rate of thromboembolic events depicted by diffusion-weighted imaging in relation to different techniques

BackgroundThe rate of thromboembolic events (TEEs) associated with endovascular treatment (EVT) of intracranial aneurysms is not reported uniformly in the literature due to the various ways that are used to...

Positional Relationship between Two Microcatheters according to the Navigation Sequence within the Curved Vessel in Neuroendovascular Procedures.

Objective In neuroendovascular treatment, there are many opportunities to guide multiple catheters into the intracranial blood vessels. We report the relationship between two microcatheters according to the guiding order with experimental in vitro studies. Materials and Methods We hypothesize that in a bent blood vessel such as a paraclinoid region of the internal carotid artery, the catheter that was first guided tended to pass through the inside, and the catheter that was guided later tended to pass through the outside. The in vitro verification was performed using a microcatheter and a balloon catheter in a silicone vascular aneurysmal model. Results As a result, it was found that the two catheters were arranged according to our hypothesis. This finding was also observed during the actual operation of balloon-assisted coil embolization. Conclusion The positional relationship between the two catheters according to the navigation order is very important, in particular during balloon-assisted coiling and stent-assisted coiling via a jailed microcatheter.

Treatment of an intracranial aneurysm in the setting of fenestration of cranial division of the internal carotid artery: Technical considerations and a literature review.

Although rare, cerebral arterial fenestration may present challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Here we present a case of a supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) fenestration adjacent to an ICA aneurysm, successfully treated with balloon-assisted coil embolization. A female in her 50's presented with an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage from a ruptured left ICA-ophthalmic artery (OA) aneurysm. Digital subtraction angiography revealed a focal ICA fenestration distal to the posterior communicating artery (Pcom). The patient underwent successful coil embolization of the aneurysm using the balloon-assisted technique. No immediate hemorrhagic, thromboembolic, or neurological complications were observed. The patient was discharged in good condition after 2 weeks of hospitalization. A comprehensive literature review of 33 cases was subsequently performed to understand the characteristics of this condition. Cases involving the cranial division of the ICA forming the fenestration exhibited caliber differences significantly more frequently (p = 0.02). Embryological insights revealed distinctions between the cranial divisions of the ICA, influencing fenestration morphology and associated aneurysm formation. Endovascular treatment poses the risk of vascular injury, necessitating the identification of this variation and procedural planning.

Embolisation of a high – flow renal arteriovenous fistula with the use of simultaneous transvenous and transarterial approach and balloon-assisted coil embolization

BackgroundRenal arteriovenous fistula (RAVF) is a rare vascular malformation, which can be asymptomatic or may cause hemorrhage, hypokalaemic hypertension, heart failure and hematuria. Endovascular embolization is a minimally invasive method which can preserve renal parenchyma. In our case, balloon assisted coil embolization with simultaneous transvenous and transarterial approach was used. A remodelling balloon, which is routinely used in neurovascular procedures, was chosen in order to eliminate the risk of coil migration and preserve feeding artery and renal parenchyma.Case presentationWe present a case of successful balloon – assisted coil embolization of a high flow renal arteriovenous fistula in a 25-year-old male patient via simultaneous transarterial and transvenous approach with preservation of the feeding artery.ConclusionEndovascular embolisation is a safe and effective treatment of RAVFs with low risk of complications. Simultaneous transarterial and transvenous coil deployment with the use of a flow control balloon catheter can eliminate the risk of coil migration and coil protrusion into the parent artery with permanent RAVF occlusion and renal parenchyma preservation.

693 Treatment Differences of Ruptured Versus Unruptured Wide Neck Aneurysms: Insights From the EVERRUN Registry

INTRODUCTION: Wide neck aneurysms (WNAs) are more challenging to treat compared to narrow neck aneurysms, requiring more advanced techniques. The Wide Neck / EVERRUN Registry compared endovascular versus microsurgical techniques for unruptured and ruptured aneurysms. METHODS: Saccular and not previously treated WNA were examined. WNA definition was aneurysm neck=4mm or dome-to-neck-ratio (DTNR)<2. Differences in treatment strategy (EVT vs. MS) and angiographic results were the primary outcomes. Angiographic outcome was assessed immediately following treatment and at last follow-up using the Raymond-Roy scale (core lab review, adequate occlusion: RR 1-2). Statistical significance set at p<0.05. All analysis performed using R(v.4.2.1). RESULTS: 310 WNA were included (87 ruptured (R) aneurysms vs. 223 unruptured (U)). There were no significant differences in the rate of EVT vs. MS between ruptured (R) vs. unruptured (U) aneurysms (Clipping, R: 36.8%, U: 37.7%). Amongst EVT, ruptured WNA were treated more with stand-alone coiling (R: 27.6%, U: 5.8%) and balloon-assisted coiling (R: 32.2%, U: 10.8%). Unruptured aneurysms were more commonly treated with flow diversion (R: 1.1%, U: 22.9%) and stent-assisted coiling (R: 2.3%, U: 21.5%) (p < 0.05 for all). Ruptured aneurysms had higher rates of adequate angiographic occlusion after initial treatment (R: 88.5%, U: 74.3%) (p < 0.05). There was no difference in final adequate occlusion at follow-up (R: 90.1%, U: 90.7%). Ruptured WNA had higher retreatment rates (R: 14.3%, U: 3.1%) (p < 0.05). Ruptured WNA had more procedural complications (R: 28.7%, U: 17%) (p < 0.05). Rates of good mRS (0-2) at one year were higher in unruptured WNA patients (R: 72.8%, U: 90.3%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: WNA rupture status significantly influences the EVT choice, likely based on the need for DAPT. The lower initial adequate occlusion in the unruptured cohort is likely due to more flow diverter use. Ruptured WNAs were more difficult to treat as evidenced by higher rates of retreatment and procedural complications, however this did not impact the final angiographic outcomes.

Large Single-Center Experience with Short-Term Follow-up of Neqstent-Assisted Coiling.

Endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms has historically proved difficult with variable outcomes. Different endovascular techniques such as balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, or intrasaccular devices provide a varied range of efficacy and safety. Neqstent-assisted coiling is a new device and technique that aim to provide a maximum of both. We analyzed the early clinical and radiologic outcomes after the use of this new technique and device in our practice. This study was a retrospective analysis of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with the Neqstent. The primary radiologic outcomes were quantified on DSA, CTA, or MRA using the modified Raymond-Roy criteria. The outcomes were defined as immediate complete occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) and complete (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) and adequate occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1 and modified Raymond-Roy criteria 2) at 6 months posttreatment. The primary safety outcome was the rate of device-related adverse events. Secondary safety outcomes included time to discharge and change in the mRS score at 6-month follow-up. Twenty patients were treated with the Neqstent from November 2020 to January 2023. Nine had unruptured aneurysms, and 11 were patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage due to ruptured aneurysms. Eighteen of 20 aneurysms (90%) treated demonstrated complete occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) on immediate postembolization angiograms. Sixteen of 17 aneurysms treated (94.1%) remained adequately occluded on 6-month follow-up (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1 and modified Raymond-Roy criteria 2). Immediate postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients; only 1 patient had residual neurologic deficits at 6 months (mRS = 2). Management of large, wide-neck aneurysms remains difficult, with high rates of recurrence and complications. The use of the Neqstent shows promising short-term results for the treatment of complex wide-neck aneurysms. Initial complication rates for our cohort were relatively high. However, this result is likely related to the initial learning experience of device deployment and the use of antiplatelets.

Comparison of Angiographic Outcomes of Woven EndoBridge and Balloon‐Assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Ruptured Wide‐Necked Aneurysms: A Multicentric Study

Background The optimal endovascular approach for acutely ruptured wide‐neck intracranial aneurysms remains uncertain, and the use of stent‐assisted coiling or flow diversion is controversial due to antiplatelet therapy requirements and potential risks. Various techniques have been developed to address these challenges, including balloon‐assisted coiling (BAC) and intrasaccular flow‐disruption. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is an intrasaccular device that has shown a favorable efficacy and safety profile for ruptured aneurysms with minimal rebleeding rates. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between WEB and BAC in a cohort of patients with ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms. Methods In this international multicenter cohort study, we included consecutive patients treated for ruptured wide‐neck intracranial aneurysms with either WEB or BAC at 4 neurovascular centers. The primary effectiveness outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion at the final imaging follow‐up using the Raymond–Roy scale. Secondary outcomes included a composite of periprocedural hemorrhagic/ischemia‐related complications and favorable functional outcome. Results The study included 104 patients treated with WEB and 107 patients treated with BAC. Of the patients, 60.5% in the WEB group and 53% in the BAC group achieved complete occlusion, with no significant difference between the 2 groups after adjusting for covariates (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; 95% CI 0.46–2.25; P = 0.964). The odds of favorable functional outcome did not significantly differ between the WEB (74.8%) and BAC groups (77.4%, adjusted OR = 1.45; 95% CI 0.65–3.24; P = 0.368). Procedure‐related complications were similar in both groups (WEB: 9.6%, BAC: 10.3%, P = 0.872), with no significant difference observed in the rates of ischemic events (WEB: 6.7% versus BAC: 2.8%; P = 0.180) and hemorrhagic events (WEB: 3.8% versus BAC: 7.5%; P = 0.255) between the 2 groups. Conclusion In conclusion, both WEB and BAC techniques showed similar effectiveness and safety outcomes in treating ruptured wide‐neck intracranial aneurysms. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to better guide treatment decisions for this patient population.

Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Past and present.

Intracranial aneurysm is common in stroke and, once rupturing, will cause disaster to patients. Nowadays, endovascular treatment has become a routine to reduce the risk of intracranial aneurysms rupture. Successive endovascular methods, like balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, and flow diversion, have become new choices for doctors. More and more doctors have been entering this field. Understanding the current general situation is crucial for more medical workers to learn the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In the past, many devices and ideas about the treatment of intracranial aneurysms appeared. Although developing unceasingly, endovascular treatment still has some deficiencies to overcome. The advantages and drawbacks of current endovascular methods are discussed.

Assessing the efficacy of VerifyNow platelet-function testing in predicting postoperative hemorrhagic complications of neuroendovascular surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis (part 2).

Dual antiplatelet therapy is used to reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications in neuroendovascular surgery. However, the predictive utility of preoperative platelet-sensitivity testing for decreasing bleed risk in patients undergoing endovascular neurointervention remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to illustrate the association between platelet response and risk of hemorrhagic complications from neuroendovascular surgery, examine the efficacy of the VerifyNow platelet reactivity unit (PRU) assay in predicting hemorrhagic outcomes, and assess whether a clinically useful threshold for platelet response can be defined to standardize guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Articles were screened for relevance by title and abstract, followed by full text. Of 735 resultant articles, 17 studies of 2084 patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention were included. Diagnoses included both intracranial and extracranial pathologies, of which 37.8% were treated with flow diversion, 22.4% with stent-assisted coil embolization, 14.3% with intracranial stenting, 12.8% with simple coil embolization, 5.8% with balloon-assisted coil embolization, 2.0% with extracranial stenting, and 4.8% with an alternate method. Precisely, 52.9% (9 out of 17) of studies determined platelet hyperresponse to be an independent predictor of postoperative hemorrhagic complications, with 11.8% (2 out of 17) of studies reporting a similar but non-statistically significant trend. 35.3% (6 out of 17) of studies found no relationship between platelet response and postoperative hemorrhagic complications. The estimated clinical threshold for PRU to prevent hemorrhagic complications varied considerably across studies (range: <46-118 PRU). Meta-analysis found platelet hyperresponse to have more than a 3-fold increased risk of hemorrhagic complications compared to normoresponders (relative risk = 3.2, p = 0.001). Although this meta-analysis shows the predictive utility of the P2Y12 assay for postoperative hemorrhagic complications in neuroendovascular surgery, the optimal therapeutic threshold for minimizing bleeding risk is still uncertain. To better understand the utility of the P2Y12 assay in the perioperative period, further prospective research is needed.

Assessing the efficacy of VerifyNow platelet-function testing in predicting postoperative thromboembolic complications of neuroendovascular surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis (part 1).

Despite the heavily debated use of routine platelet-function testing, the VerifyNow Platelet Reactivity Unit (PRU) assay has been increasingly adopted as standard of care for assessing risk of postoperative thromboembolic complications of neuroendovascular surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the relationship between platelet response and risk of ischemic events from neuroendovascular surgery, assess the efficacy of point-of-care platelet-function testing in predicting thromboembolic outcomes, and assess whether a clinically useful threshold for platelet response can be defined in order to standardize guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Following deduplication, articles were first screened for relevance by title and abstract, followed by full text. Of 735 resultant articles, 22 studies consisting of 3266 patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention were included. Diagnoses included both intracranial and extracranial pathologies, of which 45.8% were treated with flow diversion, 16.4% with stent-assisted coil embolization, 15.8% with intracranial stenting, 12.0% with simple coil embolization, 3.4% with balloon-assisted coil embolization, 3.6% with extracranial stenting, and 3.0% with an alternate method. 54.5% (12/22) of studies determined platelet hyporesponse to be an independent predictor of postoperative thromboembolic complications, with 27.3% (6/22) of studies reporting a similar, but non-statistically significant trend. 18.2% (4/22) of studies found no relationship between platelet response and postoperative thromboembolic complications. The estimated clinical threshold for PRU to prevent thromboembolic complications varied greatly across studies (Range: > 144-295 PRU). Meta-analysis found platelet hyporesponse to have a 2.23-fold increased risk of thromboembolic complications compared to normoresponders (RR = 2.23, P = 0.03). While PRU demonstrates a significant predictive value for postoperative thromboembolic complications of neuroendovascular surgery, the target therapeutic threshold for minimizing ischemic events remains unclear. Further studies, such as large multicenter cohorts of the existing data, are needed to standardize guidelines.

Intermediate catheter use is associated with intraprocedural rupture during coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.

An intermediate catheter (IMC) may pose a risk of intraprocedural rupture (IPR) during coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs), because the pressure on the microcatheter and coil might be more direct. To verify this hypothesis, this study explored whether use of an IMC might correlate with an increased rate of IPR during coil embolization for RIAs. We retrospectively reviewed 195 consecutive aneurysms in 192 patients who underwent initial coil embolization for saccular RIAs at our institution between January 2007 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups with aneurysms treated either with an IMC (IMC group) or without an IMC (non-IMC group). To investigate whether IMC use increased the rate of IPR, a propensity score-matched analysis was employed to control for age, sex, maximal aneurysm size, neck size, bleb formation, aneurysm location, proximal vessel tortuosity, balloon-assisted coiling, type of microcatheter, and type of framing coil. Ultimately, 43 (22%) coil embolization used IMC. In univariate analysis, the incidence of IPR was significantly higher in the IMC group compared with the non-IMC group (14.0 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.016). Propensity score matching was successful for pairs of 26 aneurysms in the IMC group and 52 aneurysms in the non-IMC group. The incidence of IPR was still significantly higher in the IMC group than in the non-IMC group (23.1 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.015). No significant differences in the incidences of ischemic complications and IMC-related parent artery dissection were observed between the two groups. When using IMC for coil embolization of RIAs, the surgeons should be more careful and delicate in manipulating the microcatheter and inserting the coils to avoid IPR.

Positional Relationship between Two Microcatheters according to the Navigation Sequence within the Curved Vessel in Neuroendovascular Procedures.

In neuroendovascular treatment, there are many opportunities to guide multiple catheters into the intracranial blood vessels. We report the relationship between two microcatheters according to the guiding order with experimental in vitro studies. We hypothesize that in a bent blood vessel such as a paraclinoid region of the internal carotid artery, the catheter that was first guided tended to pass through the inside, and the catheter that was guided later tended to pass through the outside. The in vitro verification was performed using a microcatheter and a balloon catheter in a silicone vascular aneurysmal model. As a result, it was found that the two catheters were arranged according to our hypothesis. This finding was also observed during the actual operation of balloon-assisted coil embolization. The positional relationship between the two catheters according to the navigation order is very important, in particular during balloon-assisted coiling and stent-assisted coiling via a jailed microcatheter.

Abstract 039: Angiographic Outcomes of Woven EndoBridge and Balloon‐Assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Ruptured Wide‐Necked Aneurysms

Introduction The optimal endovascular approach for wide‐neck intracranial aneurysms (IAs) during the acute phase of bleeding remains uncertain, and the use of stent‐assisted coiling or flow diversion is controversial due to antiplatelet therapy requirements and potential risks (1, 2). Various techniques have been developed to address these challenges, including balloon‐assisted coiling (BAC) and intrasaccular flow‐disruption. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is a flow disrupter that has gained popularity in treating ruptured IAs due to its effectiveness in occluding aneurysms with minimal rebleeding (3, 4). The aim of this study is to provide outcome comparisons between WEB and BAC in a specific cohort of patients with ruptured wide‐necked IAs. Methods In this international cohort study, we included consecutive patients treated for ruptured wide‐neck IAs with either WEB or BAC at three neurovascular centers. The primary effectiveness outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion at the final imaging follow‐up using the Raymond‐Roy (RR) occlusion classification. Secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome and periprocedural hemorrhagic/ischemia‐related complications. Comparisons were performed using multivariable logistic and ordinal regressions. Results One hundred four patients treated with WEB and 107 patients treated with BAC were included. The mean length of imaging follow‐up was 17.5 (± 17.6) months in the WEB group and 11.8 (± 10.3) months in the BAC group (p = 0.142). Of the patients, 60.5% in the WEB group and 53% in the BAC group achieved complete occlusion, with no significant difference between the two groups after adjusting for covariates (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.02; 95% CI 0.46 – 2.25; p = 0.964). The odds of favorable functional outcome did not significantly differ between the WEB (74.8%) and BAC groups (77.4%, aOR = 1.45; 95% CI 0.65 – 3.24; p = 0.368). Procedure‐related complications were similar in both groups (WEB: 9.6%, BAC: 10.3%, p = 0.872). There was no statistically significant difference observed in the rates of ischemic events (WEB: 6.7% vs. BAC: 2.8%, p = 0.180) and hemorrhagic events (WEB: 3.8% vs. BAC: 7.5%, p = 0.255) between the two groups. Conclusion In conclusion, both WEB and BAC techniques showed similar effectiveness and safety outcomes in treating ruptured wide‐neck IAs. Further research and direct comparative studies are needed to better guide treatment decisions for this patient population.

Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair With Balloon-assisted Coil Embolization

Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair With Balloon-assisted Coil Embolization

Coiling Variations for Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Comaneci-, Stent-, and Balloon-Coiling Assistance Techniques

Wide-necked aneurysms represent a challenge for treatment in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and balloon-assisted coiling (BAC) are well-known techniques for treating wide-necked aneurysms. Comaneci-assisted coiling (CAC) is a newer technique involving temporary stent deployment to assist aneurysm coiling. We aim to present the first meta-analysis comparing these treatments of ruptured aneurysms. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Embase databases were queried from earliest records to July 2022 for literature reporting SAC, BAC, or CAC of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A meta-analysis of identified articles was performed. Of the 571 articles queried, 64 articles were included. One study reported BAC and SAC, 8 reported BAC, 52 reported SAC, and 3 reported CAC. These studies comprised 3153 patients with 3207 ruptured aneurysms treated with CAC (161 patients and aneurysms), BAC (330 patients and aneurysms), and SAC (2662 patients, 2716 aneurysms). Rates of periprocedural thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications, overall or procedure-related mortality, immediate complete occlusion, retreatment, and length of angiographic follow-up did not differ significantly between SAC and BAC. Periprocedural thromboembolic (P= 0.03) and hemorrhagic (P= 0.01) complication rates were higher with BAC than CAC. Periprocedural thromboembolic (P= 0.03) and hemorrhagic (P < 0.0001) complication rates were higher with SAC than CAC. Complete aneurysm occlusion rates (P= 0.033) were higher with CAC than BAC. No significant differences were present in CAC versus BAC or SAC retreatment rates. CAC was associated with lower hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complication rates and demonstrated similar complete occlusion and residual retreatment rates to those for BAC and SAC.

Safety and feasibility of the Wahoo Hybrid Access System, a dual-mode guide catheter, in a range of neuroendovascular procedures.

There is a clinical need for a guide catheter with combined stability and navigability, which can be used in a biaxial system for neuroendovascular procedures in place of triaxial systems. To assess the safety and feasibility of the Q'Apel Medical Wahoo Hybrid Access System, a dual-mode 0.072″ internal diameter guide catheter, in a range of neuroendovascular procedures. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive cases from a high-volume tertiary center in which the Wahoo Hybrid Access System was used as the guide catheter. Characteristics of the patients, vascular lesions, procedure, and procedural complications were assessed. A total of 102 patients were included for analysis. Vascular lesions were in the anterior circulation in 90 of 102 (88%), and posterior circulation in 12 of 102 (12%). Eighty-four cases were ruptured or unruptured aneurysm embolization procedures, the majority being balloon-assisted coiling (42%) and flow diversion (42%). All cases, including flow diversion, were performed as a biaxial system. There were no instances of prolapse of the catheter beyond the arterial segment in which it was initially placed. The procedure was able to be performed to completion in 101 of 102 (99%) cases. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 5 of 102 (5%); causality in two cases was unrelated to the guide catheter, and three were indeterminate. The Wahoo guide catheter is safe and feasible when used in a variety of neuroendovascular procedures. It can accommodate a range of devices, can be safely navigated into distal vasculature, and provides support for a range of procedures, including those which traditionally require triaxial support.

Diffusion-weighted imaging lesions after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms: A network meta-analysis.

Thromboembolism is one of the common complications in endovascular treatments including coiling alone, stent-assisted coiling (SAC), balloon-assisted coiling (BAC), and flow-diverting (FD) stents. Such treatments are widely used in intracranial aneurysms (IAs), which usually present as positive lesions in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Whether these adjunctive techniques increase postprocedural DWI-positive lesions after endovascular treatment remains unclear. A thorough electronic search for the literature published in English between January 2000 and October 2022 was conducted on PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE. Eighteen studies (3 cohort studies and 15 case-control studies) involving 1,843 patients with unruptured IAs (UIAs) were included. We performed a frequentist framework network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the rank risks of cerebral thromboembolism of the above four endovascular treatments. The incoherence test was used to analyze the statistical disagreement between direct and indirect evidence. Funnel plots were used to analyze publication bias. The incidences of DWI lesions in patients who received FD stents, SAC, BAC, and coiling alone were 66.1% (109/165), 37.6% (299/795), 31.1% (236/759), and 25.6% (236/921). The incidence of DWI lesions in patients who received FD stents was higher than that in patients who received SAC [OR: 2.40; 95% CI (1.15, 5.00), P < 0.05], BAC [OR: 2.62; 95% CI (1.19, 5.77), P < 0.05], or coiling alone [OR: 2.77; 95% CI (1.26, 6.07), P < 0.05]. The incoherence test showed preferable consistency in this NMA. No obvious publication bias was found in the funnel plot. FD stent placement brings more ischemic lesions identified by DWI than any other procedures for patients with UIA. The characteristics of FD stents may result in a high incidence of DWI lesions.

Incidence of intra-procedural complications according to the timing of endovascular treatment in ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Although endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms is well-established, some critical issues have not yet been clarified, such as the effects of timing on safety and effectiveness of the procedure. The aim of our study was to analyze the incidence of intra-procedural complications according to the timing of treatment, as they can affect morbidity and mortality. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms at three high flow center. For all patients, imaging and clinical data, aneurysm's type, mean dimension and different treatment techniques were analyzed. Intra-procedural complications were defined as thrombus formation at the aneurysm's neck, thromboembolic events, and rupture of the aneurysm. Patients were divided into three groups according to time between subarachnoid hemorrhage and treatment (<12 h hyper-early, 12-36 h early, and >36 h delayed). The final study population included 215 patients. In total, 84 patients (39%) underwent hyper-early, 104 (48%) early, and 27 (13%) delayed endovascular treatment. Overall, 69% of the patients were treated with simple coiling, 23% with balloon-assisted coiling, 1% with stent-assisted coiling, 3% with a flow-diverter stent, 3% with an intrasaccular flow disruptor device, and 0.5% with parent vessel occlusion. Delayed endovascular treatment was associated with an increased risk of total intra-procedural complications compared to both hyper-early (p = 0.009) and early (p = 0.004) treatments with a rate of complications of 56% (vs. 29% in hyper-early and 26% in early treated group-p = 0.011 and p = 0.008). The delayed treatment group showed a higher rate of thrombus formation and thromboembolic events. The increased risk of total intra-procedural complications in delayed treatment was confirmed, also considering only the patients treated with simple coiling and balloon-assisted coiling (p = 0.005 and p = 0.003, respectively, compared to hyper-early and early group) with a rate of complications of 62% (vs. 28% in hyper-early and 26% in early treatments-p = 0.007 and p = 0.003). Also in this subpopulation, delayed treated patients showed a higher incidence of thrombus formation and thromboembolic events. Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms more than 36 h after SAH seems to be associated with a higher risk of intra-procedural complications, especially thrombotic and thromboembolic events.

Assessment of balloon remodeling techniques in endovascular treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms (WN-IAs)

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the clinical, technical, and angiographic results in endovascular management of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms (WN-IAs) using the balloon-remodeling technique. Methods This study was a prospective, single-center study that was carried out over a period of three years from January 2019 to December 2021 at the Neuro-Interventional Unit at our hospital. Patients who presented with WNIAs and were eligible for endovascular treatment using the balloon-remodeling approach were included in the study. Results We included 37 patients with a mean age of 49.7 ± 12.3 years. About 91.9% of the participants had SAH, 5.4% had unruptured aneurysms, and 2.7% had intracranial hemorrhage. The mean time to treatment was 6.97 ± 7.35 days, the mean aneurysm diameter was 5.7 ± 1.7 mm, and the mean neck diameter was 3.8 ± 1.0 mm. The majority of the patients had a dom-to-neck ratio of less than 2 (89.2%). We have used hyper form balloons in 48.6%, hyper glide in 43.2%, Copernic balloons in 5.4%, and eclipse in 2.7%. According to the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, 86.5% of the patients had complete obliteration, 10.8% had residual neck, and 2.7% had a residual aneurysm. Almost 91.9% had no complications, 2.7% had ischemia, and 5.4% had mild rupture by wire, treated by 5 min hyperinflation of the balloon till hemorrhage stopped. Conclusions Balloon-assisted detachable coiling is an important option in the treatment of WN-IAs. We found that this technique allowed safe and efficient treatment of aneurysms when conventional treatment had failed due to WN. Endovascular coiling using the balloon remodeling technique of wide neck showed a high technical success rate and good short-term clinical outcomes. A good selection of patients with WN-IAs treated by endovascular coiling using balloon remodeling technique and a good selection of materials used help in decreasing the complications.