Although ground stone tools (GSTs) are among the most abundant stone tools in archaeological sites, they are rarely investigated both from the archaeological and the geological point of view. There are many pieces made of siliciclastic sedimentary raw material. Their fragmentary condition makes it possible to examine them by slightly destructive methods, such HMA (heavy mineral analysis), which was developed primarily for siliciclastic rocks. Until now, ‘sensu stricto’ (s.str) heavy mineral analysis has not yet been carried out for ground stone tools, neither at the national nor at the international level. By comparing the heavy mineral compositions of the stone tools and their potential raw materials with the help of a newly developed HM descriptive system (including rutile, zircon, tourmaline, apatite and titanite), it is possible to determine the provenance of these archaeological materials. From the Neolithic tell of Gorzsa, 109 red sandstone macrolithic stone tools are known. These were separated into four, different types (‘Red–1’ – ‘Red–4’), based on the macroscopic and microscopic analysis. 11 fragments were chosen for HMA analysis. In addition, red-coloured sandstones from different geological occurrences of the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin (22 pieces) were also investigated. Based on the heavy mineral analysis, all raw material types of the stone tools could be originated from the Maros River and the Apuseni Mountains (Transylvania). However, the previously determined potential sources (Permotriassic and Miocene sequences from the Mecsek Mountains, Balaton Highlands, pebbles from the Danube River, and Papuk Mountains) cannot be excluded with absolute certainty from the possible raw materials.
Read full abstract