Background Statins Research Articles

Statin use before acute coronary syndrome and coronary risk factors, clinical presentation, interventions, and outcomes: ACC-NCDR-CathPCI Registry in India

Abstract Background Statins are used for coronary artery disease (CAD) primary and secondary prevention. Limited studies on the association of statin use before acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with clinical presentation and outcomes are available. Purpose We compared statin-user and statin-naïve ACS patients for clinical and angiographic findings and in-hospital and 3-year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Successive patients with ACS who underwent PCI from Sep’17 to Dec’23 were enrolled in the ACC-NCDR-CathPCI registry in India. Details of risk factors, clinical presentation, coronary angiography, interventions and in-hospital were recorded. Follow-up data in a sub-cohort recruited from Apr’19 to Mar’22 were obtained for incident major cardiovascular events (MCE) (cardiovascular deaths, recurrent ACS, PCI and bypass surgery). Results 8296 ACS patients were enrolled; prior statin use was in 3149 (38%) and statin naïve were 5147 (62%). Statin-user vs statin-naïve patients were older (61.6+10 vs 59.7+11y), with more hypertension (60.1 vs 48.6%), diabetes (35.8 vs 31.8%), pre-existing CAD (PCI 20.9 vs 9.1%; CABG 5.0 vs 2.3%) and lower mean total, LDL, and NHDL cholesterol (p<0.001). Statin users had less ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (28.4% vs 45.2%), more non-STEMI (65.2 vs 50.8%), better LVEF (46.3+10 vs 44.5+10%), >2 coronary stents (35.5 vs 29.5%), lower mechanical circulatory support (2.2 vs 3.9%) and lower median hospitalization (66.1 vs 68.5h) (p<0.001). In statin-users incidence of in-hospital CAD deaths was 29 (0.92%) vs 78 (1.52%) (odds ratio, OR 0.61, 95% confidence intervals 0.39-0.93) and all-cause deaths 33 (1.05) vs 91(1.77%) (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.39-0.88) (p<0.01). ORs attenuated following multivariate adjustments for risk factors, clinical presentation and interventions. In the follow up cohort (n=3813, high-intensity statins 99.6%), among baseline statin-users incident MCE was 98 (6.9%) vs 214 (8.9%) (hazard ratio, HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.59-0.97) and CVD deaths were in 46 (3.2%) vs 113 (4.7%) (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.48-0.96) with attenuation following adjustment for baseline clinical variables and interventions. Conclusions Acute coronary syndrome patients taking pre-admission statins have significantly lower in-hospital and long-term cardiovascular and all-cause mortality following PCI.

Adverse cardiovascular outcomes due to potential drug-drug interactions in statin therapy: a population-based study

Abstract Background Statins have been proven to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and in primary prevention. Given their unique role in ASCVD, concomitant use of statins and other medications are inevitable. Our clinicians’ duty is to identify clinically important drug-drug interactions (DDI) with statins and to minimize potential life-threatening adverse drug reactions. Purpose To understand the clinical relevance of statin related DDI, we aimed to analyse the prevalence and level of severity of potential statin DDI in a real-world territory-wide population-based study. Methods We retrospectively analysed 95278 patients (mean age 64.3±11.4, female 45.0%) prescribed simvastatin (N=56111, 59%), atorvastatin (N=33902, 36%), or rosuvastatin (N=5265, 5%) from 2013-2022 among 16 public hospitals. Covariates were balanced with 1:1 propensity score matching for patients with and without potential DDI, resulting in 35907 patients in each arm. A composite 4-point MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events) was used as the primary outcome, which included coronary revascularisation, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiovascular-related death (CV death). Cox proportional-hazard model with competing risk regression was performed to estimate adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary analyses would be focusing on adverse drug reactions in these three different statin subgroups. Results At 1-year follow up, subjects with potential statin related DDI have higher propensities of deranged liver function (ALT>=3x ULN, 4.9% vs 3.4%; p<0.001), elevated creatine kinase (CK>=5x ULN, 0.9% vs 0.5%, p<0.001) and deranged renal function (creatinine level >=2X ULN, 0.3% vs 0.2%, p<0.001) than non-DDI group. At 5-year follow up, the statin DDI group had higher incidences of MI (2.9% vs 1.9%, p<0.01), stroke (4.0% vs 2.3%, p<0.001) and CV death (1.7 % vs 1.5%, p=0.038). Potential DDI had most significant effect seen on simvastatin compared to other statins. Simvastatin DDI cohort had strong association with subsequent coronary vascularization (aHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21–1.64, p<0.005), MI (aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.46–1.88, p<0.005), stroke (aHR 1.95, 95% CI 1.76–2.16, p<0.005), and CV-related death (aHR 1.18, 95% 1.00–1.38, p=0.05) as compared to control. Atorvastatin DDI cohort was associated with higher rates of MI (aHR 1.81, 95% CI 1.54–2.12, p<0.005) and stroke (aHR 1.64, 95% CI 0.39–1.94, p<0.005) than control. Rosuvastatin DDI cohort was weakly associated with higher rates of MI (aHR 1.75, 95% CI 1.02–3.01, p=0.04). Conclusion Potential statin related drug-drug interactions are prevalent and were associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. Our real-world data demonstrated that simvastatin related drug-drug interaction pose a significant threat to our patients with association with CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke and future coronary revascularization.4-point MACE

Sex differences in reporting of statin-associated diabetes mellitus to the US Food and Drug Administration

Abstract Background Statins have been reported to precipitate diabetes mellitus (DM) in some patients. Limited evidence suggests that this occurs in women more frequently than men, but direct comparisons of rates of reporting of statin-associated DM between men and women are lacking. Purpose To determine whether there are sex-specific differences in post-marketing reporting of statin-associated DM. Methods We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of spontaneously reported adverse drug events (ADEs) submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System between January 1997 and September 2023. A Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) was used to identify the rate of reported statin-associated DM ADEs relative to the rate of DM ADEs reported with all other medications. We compared signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) between men and women using a modified relative odds ratio (ROR). Results During the study period, there were two-fold as many reports of statin-associated DM in women than in men (14,793 versus 7,307, respectively), despite the fact there were only 7% more non-DM statin ADEs reported in women compared to men (512,134 versus 480,849, respectively). Compared to the background rate of reporting for all ADEs (0.6%), statin-induced DM was disproportionally reported for all subjects in aggregate (2.1%, PRR=3.7) as well as for men only (1.5%, PRR=2.4) and for women only (2.9%, PRR=5.3). Significant PRRs for DM were observed with each statin and for all statins collectively (Figure 1). Statins were reported as the primary- or secondary-suspected cause of DM in women with considerably greater frequency than in men (58% versus 29%, respectively). Rates of reporting of statin-associated DM were higher in women than in men for all statins, with the greatest difference being observed with atorvastatin (ROR 3.0), and the lowest difference being observed with rosuvastatin (ROR 1.2) (Figure 1). Conclusions Post-marketing ADE surveillance data suggest a markedly higher rate of incident DM associated with statins than with other medications and a higher rate of reporting of statin-associated DM in women than in men. Future studies should consider sex-moderated mechanisms of statin-associated DM.Figure 1

Cardioprotective role of statins in breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Statins may have cardioprotective effects in patients undergoing cardiotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Yet, their role in mitigating anthracycline and/or trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer remains unclear. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of statins in mitigating anthracycline and/or trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity among patients with breast cancer. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases until January 2024 for studies comparing the efficacy of statin therapy versus no statin therapy in breast cancer patients receiving either anthracyclines, trastuzumab, or both. Cardiotoxicity was defined as per the definition of each individual study. A random-effects model was used to assess pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.4.1. Results We included five studies, of which two were randomised trials. The pooled population comprised 1,839 anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab-treated patients with breast cancer, of whom 864 (47%) received statin therapy. In the pooled analyses, cardiotoxicity was significantly lower in the statin therapy group as compared with the no statin therapy group (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.72; p=0.001; Figure 1A), additionally statin therapy was associated with a significantly lower reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction as compared with no statin therapy (MD 4.11%; 95% CI 2.68 to 5.53; p<0.00001; Figure 1B). Conclusion In this meta-analysis, statin therapy in anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab-treated patients with breast cancer was associated with lower cardiotoxicity and decline in left ventricular ejection fraction.

The impact of SLCO1B1 single nucleotide polymorphism and non-genetic factors on statin-induced myopathy

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Statins, also known as HMG CoA Reductase Inhibitors, are a class of drugs considered the drug of choice for treating hypercholesterolemia. Statins are well tolerated; however, they may cause severe myopathy in 20% to 30% of patients, due to the individual variation regarding its efficacy and related adverse effects. Of these, comes the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) T521C of the SLCO1B1 gene that encodes the protein involved in the trafficking of statins from the blood to hepatocytes which is called Organic Anion Transport Protein 1B1 (OATP1B1). The T521C single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) results in a substitute of valine with alanine resulting in a decreased or lack of functional protein. Purpose The aim is to determine the frequency of the high-risk C allele and to define its impact on statin-induced myopathy in Syrian patients on statins. In addition to the non-genetic factors that may affect the ability to develop statin-induced myopathy. Methods This was an observational case-control study that had ethical approval from Damascus University (No.433/ 2020). The case group included 44 patients on statins who experienced myopathy, 18 patients who had increased creatinine kinase levels (CK), and 26 patients with normal CK levels, while the control group encompassed 56 patients who were taking statins and had no muscular adverse events. The DNA was extracted from each sample and then genotyped using standard sequencing of specific PCR products using a specific pair of primers. Results The age of patients in the case arm ranged between 27 and 84 years with an average ± SD of (58.2 ± 12.7 years), 70% of them were males. In comparison with (53.34 ± 12.4 years) in the control arm, 66% of them were males without a statistically significant differences (p=0.672, 0.057) respectively. The statin type and dose have a statistically non-significant effect, the average statin dose in the case arm and the control arm was 26.02 mg and 31.27 mg respectively (p=0.072). While the statin type treatment varied as 59% used atorvastatin and 39% used rosuvastatin in the case group compared with 71% used atorvastatin and 27% used rosuvastatin in the control group, without a statistically significant difference (p=0.252). The frequency of the C allele reaches 19.3% and is distributed in three genotypes: wild-type TT (68%), heterozygote TC (25%), and homozygote CC (7%) in the case arm, while it does not exceed 8% in the control arm with the absence of the CC genotype. Only a statistically significant difference was found in the frequency of the CC genotype between these two groups (p=0.047). Conclusion Our study is the first to identify the frequency of the 521T>C SNP of the SLCO1B1 gene in Syrian patients taking statins. Our data reveals a high prevalence of risk allele C in the patients who suffer from statin-induced myopathy with a statically significant difference from the control arm (p=0.026).

Evolocumab Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Pooled Data From Three Open-Label Studies.

Pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and difficulty meeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated pooled safety and efficacy data from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH treated with the PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) monoclonal antibody inhibitor evolocumab. Patients with HoFH aged 10 to 17 years received treatment with open-label evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously monthly or biweekly in the TAUSSIG, RAMAN, or HAUSER-OLE clinical studies. All patients received background statins with or without ezetimibe. Study duration ranged from 12 to 260 weeks. The primary end point was treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years. Efficacy end points were changes from baseline to week 12 in lipids and PCSK9. Of the 39 patients in the pooled analysis, 69.2% were males, median age was 13.0 years, and 79.5% (31/39) had genotyped HoFH with LDLR pathogenic variants. Overall, median exposure to evolocumab was 18.2 (Q1, Q3: 3.0, 18.5) months. Treatment-emergent adverse events with an exposure-adjusted patient incidence rate of ≥5% were upper respiratory tract infection (6.6%), influenza (5.2%), and acne (5.0%) per 100 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted patient incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events was 13.3% per 100 patient-years. Excluding 4 patients receiving lipoprotein apheresis, week 12 median percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was -2.9% (Q1, Q3: -21.7, 1.5); however, 42.9% (15/35) of patients achieved ≥15% reduction in LDL-C from baseline. Residual LDLR (LDL receptor) activity was not associated with a reduction in LDL-C. In this pooled data analysis from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH, evolocumab was well tolerated, with no new safety signals reported. These safety findings are consistent with findings from previous studies of evolocumab. Patients showed marked variability in LDL-C reduction. Results from this pooled analysis support guidelines suggesting a trial of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy regardless of estimated residual LDLR function. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01624142, NCT03403374, and NCT02624869.

Pregnancy-related adverse events associated with statins: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

ABSTRACT Background Statins, previously rated as pregnancy category X agents, were contraindicated during pregnancy due to the teratogenic effects observed in animal studies. However, it is still controversial whether statins have detrimental impact on pregnant women or not, and some studies even suggest a potential benefit of statin use against pregnancy complications. The aim of this study was to explore whether maternal exposure to statins is associated with increased rates of pregnancy-related adverse events (AEs), including abortion, abortion spontaneous, preterm birth, low birth weight, stillbirth/fetal death, and fetal complications. Research design and methods Data from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2022 were extracted through the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, to conduct disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis by reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) algorithms. To identify the potential risks of pregnancy-related AEs, each statin was compared to all the other drugs, all the other statins, and the reference drugs (fenofibrate and evolocumab). Results A total of 477 cases involving pregnancy-related AEs associated with stains were submitted to the FAERS database by healthcare professionals. No obvious disproportionate association of abortion, abortion spontaneous, or stillbirth/fetal death was identified for all statins during gestation. In comparison with all the other drugs, lovastatin showed an increased risk of fetal complications (ROR = 2.45, 95% CI, 1.22–4.95; IC025 = 0.63), and pravastatin demonstrated increased risks of preterm birth (ROR = 4.89, 95% CI, 3.65–6.54; IC025 = 1.69) and low birth weight (ROR = 9.60, 95% CI, 5.56–16.56; IC025 = 1.88). Similar results were found when compared lovastatin or pravastatin with fenofibrate. Furthermore, statins were associated with higher proportion of fetal complications and preterm birth when comparing with evolocumab. Conclusions Statins did not increase the risk of pregnancy-related AEs, including abortion, abortion spontaneous, or stillbirth/fetal death. However, we did find significant disproportionality signals for preterm birth and low birth weight associated with pravastatin, and lovastatin was related to a higher proportion of fetal complications. The results in this study may provide evidence on the safety of statins during pregnancy, which need to be verified in further investigations.

Identifying Reasons for Statin Nonuse in Patients With Diabetes Using Deep Learning of Electronic Health Records.

Background Statins are guideline-recommended medications that reduce cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Yet, statin use is concerningly low in this high-risk population. Identifying reasons for statin nonuse, which are typically described in unstructured electronic health record data, can inform targeted system interventions to improve statin use. We aimed to leverage a deep learning approach to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with diabetes. Methods and Results Adults with diabetes and no statin prescriptions were identified from a multiethnic, multisite Northern California electronic health record cohort from 2014 to 2020. We used a benchmark deep learning natural language processing approach (Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) to identify statin nonuse and reasons for statin nonuse from unstructured electronic health record data. Performance was evaluated against expert clinician review from manual annotation of clinical notes and compared with other natural language processing approaches. Of 33 461 patients with diabetes (mean age 59±15 years, 49% women, 36% White patients, 24% Asian patients, and 15% Hispanic patients), 47% (15 580) had no statin prescriptions. From unstructured data, Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers accurately identified statin nonuse (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.99 [0.98-1.0]) and key patient (eg, side effects/contraindications), clinician (eg, guideline-discordant practice), and system reasons (eg, clinical inertia) for statin nonuse (AUC 0.90 [0.86-0.93]) and outperformed other natural language processing approaches. Reasons for nonuse varied by clinical and demographic characteristics, including race and ethnicity. Conclusions A deep learning algorithm identified statin nonuse and actionable reasons for statin nonuse in patients with diabetes. Findings may enable targeted interventions to improve guideline-directed statin use and be scaled to other evidence-based therapies.

Paediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia treated with evolocumab for 80 weeks (HAUSER-OLE): a single-arm, multicentre, open-label extension of HAUSER-RCT

The HAUSER-RCT study showed that 24 weeks of evolocumab (a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 [PCSK9] inhibitor) in paediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia was safe and improved lipid parameters compared to placebo. Here, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of evolocumab in this population for an additional 80 weeks. HAUSER-OLE was an 80-week, single-arm, open-label extension of HAUSER-RCT, a randomised controlled trial, and was conducted at 46 centres in 23 countries. Paediatric patients aged 10-17 years with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia who completed 24 weeks of monthly treatment with subcutaneously administered placebo or 420 mg evolocumab in HAUSER-RCT with no serious treatment-emergent adverse events were eligible to enrol in HAUSER-OLE. All patients received open-label subcutaneous evolocumab 420 mg monthly with background statins with or without ezetimibe for 80 additional weeks. The primary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated by changes in lipids from the baseline of HAUSER-RCT to the end of HAUSER-OLE (104 weeks). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02624869) and is now completed. Between Sept 10, 2016, and Nov 25, 2019, 157 patients were enrolled in HAUSER-RCT and received randomised treatment; 150 continued to HAUSER-OLE, received evolocumab treatment, and were included in the full analysis set, presented here. 146 (97%) of 150 patients completed the open-label extension. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in HAUSER-OLE was 70% (105 of 150). Overall, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (22 [15%] of 150), headache (14 [9%]), and influenza-like illness (13 [9%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in four (3%) of 150 patients (perforated appendicitis and peritonitis, wrist fracture, anorexia nervosa, and headache); none was considered related to evolocumab. No treatment-emergent adverse events led to treatment discontinuation. At week 80, the mean percentage change from baseline in LDL cholesterol was -35·3% (SD 28·0). After 80 weeks of treatment, evolocumab was safe, well tolerated, and led to sustained reductions in LDL cholesterol in paediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. When lipid goals cannot be achieved with conventional treatments, evolocumab is an effective add-on therapy in paediatric patients. Amgen. For the French, Spanish, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant statin–drug interactions among Yemeni patients taking statins for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Background Statins are extensively used in clinical practice for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Statins are usually taken in combination with other medications. This may increase the risk of statin-drug interactions. The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patterns, and predictors of clinically significant statin-drug interactions among patients on statin therapy. Material and Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at the cardiology, endocrine, and internal medicine outpatient clinics in four tertiary care hospitals in Sana’a, Yemen. Lexicomp Drug Interaction database was used to analyze the prescriptions for potential statin-drug interactions. Binary and multivariable logistic regression were utilized for analysis. Results Of the total number of patients (634), 114 individuals (18%) had a total of 122 statin-drug interactions. According to Lexicomp risk classification, 102 (83.6%) DDIs were class C (monitor therapy), 19 (15.6%) were class D (therapy modification), and only one (0.8%) class X (avoid combination). Simvastatin use was significantly associated with the presence of category D and X DDIs (15.9% vs. 1.6%, p < .001). Polypharmacy (OR = 2.571, p < .001) and having ≥3 comorbidities (OR = 2.512, p < .001) were the only variables associated with the presence of statin-drug interactions (C, D, and/or X). Conclusion Patients with polypharmacy and those with three or more comorbidities had a higher risk for statin-drug interactions. Therefore, routine screening by physicians and pharmacists for potential interactions should occur before prescribing or dispensing any medication to avoid clinically significant statin-drug interactions.

Efficacy and Safety of Lipid-Lowering Drugs of Different Intensity on Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

There have been many meta-analyses for statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) to evaluate clinical outcomes, but the efficacy and safety of different intensity of these three drugs on clinical outcomes was absent. PCSK9i, ezetimibe, and statins were divided into seven interventions as follows: including PCSK9i + high-intensity statins (P9i+HT), PCSK9i + moderate-intensity statins (P9i+MT), ezetimibe + high-intensity statins (Eze+HT), ezetimibe + moderate-intensity statins (Eze+MT), high-intensity statins (HT), moderate-intensity statins (MT), and low-intensity statins (LT). The risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the clinical outcomes in all randomized controlled trials included. In traditional meta-analysis, the more intensive treatment had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88–0.95), cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86–0.92), myocardial infarction (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.77–0.81), coronary revascularization (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.84), and cerebrovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.80–0.88) compared with the less intensive treatment. However, the more intensive treatment had a higher risk of new-onset diabetes (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12). The network meta-analysis demonstrated that P9i+HT, P9i+MT, HT, and MT were significantly associated with a risk reduction in coronary revascularization and cerebrovascular events compared with PLBO. LT could effectively reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54–0.92), MI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.82), and coronary revascularization (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65–0.91) compared with PLBO. P9i+HT was superior to HT in reducing the risk of MI (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68–0.90), coronary revascularization (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73–0.96), and cerebrovascular events (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64–0.95). However, compared with PLBO, P9i+HT, HT, and MT could increase the risk of new-onset diabetes (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11–1.37; RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14–1.33; RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.15, respectively). In conclusion, PCSK9i added to background statins may be recommended as preferred lipid-lowering therapy, and did not increase the additional risk of new-onset diabetes. The safety and efficacy of ezetimibe was not superior to that of statins. LT can be recommended as the initial therapy.

Evolocumab use in Europe: clinical guidelines vs. reimbursement thresholds – results from the HEYMANS study

Abstract Background 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines recommend a 50% lowering in untreated LDL-C and use of PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for patients (pts) at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk when LDL-C goals of &amp;lt;1.4mmol/L are not met despite maximally tolerated statins and ezetimibe. However, the LDL-C threshold at which PCSK9i are reimbursed are higher than the goals recommended in clinical guidelines. Purpose This prospective observational cohort study describes clinical characteristics and LDL-C control among pts initiating evolocumab across 12 EU countries. Methods Pts are followed from evolocumab initiation (baseline). Demographic/clinical characteristics, lipid lowering therapy (LLT) and lipid values are being collected from medical records (6 months before evolocumab up to 30 months post initiation). We report interim data from pts initiating evolocumab from August 2015 followed-up until July 2020. Results Of the 1,952 pts in whom evolocumab was initiated as per local reimbursement criteria, most (1844 [94%]) had 12 months follow-up, 785 (40%) had 24 months follow-up; mean follow-up: 20 months. Mean (SD) age was 60 (10.8) years; 85% of pts had a history of CV disease, 45% had familial hypercholesterolemia, 19% had type 2 diabetes, 65% were hypertensive, 7% had chronic kidney disease and 51% were prior/current smokers. At evolocumab initiation, 60% reported statin intolerance and 41% were on no background LLT. Fewer than half (846 [43%]) were receiving a statin (± ezetimibe); of these, most received a high/moderate intensity (68%/22%), with 13% receiving statin monotherapy. Median (Q1, Q3) baseline LDL-C was 3.98 (3.17, 5.07) mmol/L. Within 3 months of initiation median LDL-C fell by 58% to 1.63mmol/L. This reduction was maintained over time (Figure 1). Overall, 58% of pts achieved at least one LDL-C &amp;lt;1.4mmol/L during follow-up. Among pts receiving background statins ± ezetimibe at evolocumab initiation, 67% (710/1053) achieved at least one LDL-C &amp;lt;1.4mmol/L, versus 44% (317/714) of pts not receiving background statins/ezetimibe. During follow-up background oral LLT did not materially change; 40–45% pts received no LLT, 41–44% received statin ± ezetimibe, 12–14% received statin monotherapy. Conclusion In Europe, pts initiated on evolocumab had baseline LDL-C levels almost 3x higher than the present threshold for PCSK9i use recommended in guidelines reflecting disparities between local reimbursement criteria and guidelines. Although evolocumab led to a &amp;gt;50% reduction in LDL-C, only ∼50% pts achieved an LDL-C &amp;lt;1.4mmol/L, as approximately 41% received only evolocumab as monotherapy. LDL-C goal attainment was however higher among pts receiving evolocumab with background LLT. Therefore, lowering the LDL-C threshold for PCSK9i reimbursement, would result in more patients receiving combination therapy with oral LLT plus PCSK9i, thus increasing the likelihood of more pts achieving very-high risk LDL-C goals. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen Europe GmbH

Effect of bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination vs ezetimibe or placebo on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolemia not treated with statins

ObjectiveStatins are sometimes associated with worsened glycemic control. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may require non-statin therapies to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering goals. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid 180 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg fixed-dose combination (BA + EZE FDC) in patients with T2DM and hypercholesterolemia who were not receiving background statins or other lipid-lowering therapy. MethodsPatients with T2DM and elevated LDL-C levels were enrolled into this phase 2, double-blind study (NCT03531905). Patients received placebo during a 5-week washout period where background lipid-lowering therapies (including statins) were discontinued. Eligible patients were then randomized 1:1:1 to receive either BA + EZE FDC, ezetimibe 10 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Assessments included the percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C, other lipid parameters, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP); and the monitoring of safety and tolerability. ResultsAmong 179 randomized patients, baseline characteristics following the washout period were similar across treatment groups, with mean LDL-C levels of 142.6 mg/dL and mean glycated hemoglobin of 8.0%. At week 12, BA + EZE FDC therapy lowered mean LDL-C levels by 38.8%, significantly more than ezetimibe alone (19.2%; difference, 19.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.4%–25.7%]; p < 0.001) or placebo (increase of 0.9%; difference, 39.6% [95% CI, 33.4%–45.8%]; p < 0.001). BA + EZE FDC significantly reduced hsCRP levels from baseline vs ezetimibe (29.2%; p = 0.005) and vs placebo (36.7%; p < 0.001). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low in all treatment groups, with no indication of worsened glycemic control. ConclusionIn patients with T2DM and hypercholesterolemia who were not receiving statins or other lipid-lowering drugs, BA + EZE FDC significantly lowered LDL-C levels and was generally well tolerated.

Statins and risk of diverticular disease: Nested case-control study.

Statins exert pleiotropic anti-inflammatory effects and may prevent diverticular disease. However, the association remains poorly understood with previous studies obtaining conflicting results. To examine the effect of statin on the subsequent risk of diverticular disease. We conducted a nested case-control study in Denmark among respondents (>18 years) of the 2010 or the 2013 Danish National Health Survey. Among these, we identified 8809 cases of hospital-diagnosed diverticular disease and risk-set sampled population controls without diverticular disease. Using complete prescription and hospital records, we used conditional logistic regression to compute odds ratios (ORs) associating statin use with diverticular disease. In adjusted analyses, we controlled for hospital-based diagnoses, medication use other than statins, and lifestyle and socioeconomic factors. The fully adjusted OR for diverticular disease associated with ever use (≥1 statin prescription filling) was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.12-1.27) compared with never use. However, we observed no dose-response relation. For example, among short-term users (<5 years), the OR was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04-1.35) for low intensity users and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.01-1.26) for high intensity users. Among long-term users (≥5 years), the respective ORs were 1.25 (95% CI: 1.13-1.38) and 1.11 (95% CI: 0.98-1.24). In analyses restricting to cases and controls with a previous colonoscopy, associations were null (OR: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.85-1.20]). The observed association of a higher risk of diverticular disease associated with statins could be explained by diagnostic bias. Our study did not support a protective nor harmful effect of statins on the risk of diverticular disease.

Effect of statin on perioperative myocardial injury in isolated valve surgery.

Statins have known pleiotropic effects that confer protection from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Because cardiopulmonary bypass is a potentially reversible ischemia-reperfusion sequence, we aimed to assess whether statin loading could help to limit myocardial injury in patients undergoing isolated heart valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. One hundred patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease undergoing valve replacement received either a loading dose of rosuvastatin (40 mg initiated 7 days before surgery; loaded group) or no statins (non-loaded group). Cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase MB, and brain natriuretic peptide were measured at 8, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the extent of perioperative myocardial injury measured by the area under the curve for each biomarker. Despite similar baseline levels, all biomarkers at 8, 24, and 48 h were significantly lower in the loaded group. The area under the curve of each biomarker was significantly lower in the loaded group than in the non-loaded group (troponin I: 31.43 vs. 77.21 ng·h·mL-1, creatine kinase MB 309.31 vs. 429.12 ng·h·mL-1, brain natriuretic peptide 5176.11 vs. 16119.31 pg·h·mL-1, all p < 0.001). The mean changes from baseline to peak levels were also significantly lower in the loaded group. The loaded group had a shorter hospital stay but no significant difference was seen in ventilator time, inotrope time, aortic crossclamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, or intensive care unit stay. In patients undergoing valve replacement, high-dose statin loading before surgery had a favorable impact on the release kinetics of various cardiac biomarkers.

Does Evolocumab use in Europe match 2019 ESC/EAS lipid guidelines? Results from the HEYMANS study

Abstract Background 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines recommend a 50% lowering in untreated LDL-C and use of PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for patients at very-high cardiovascular (CV) risk when LDL-C target goals of &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L or &amp;lt;1.0 mmol/L (for those with 2 CV events within two-years) are not met despite maximally tolerated statins and ezetimibe. Purpose This observational study describes a cohort of patients initiating evolocumab across 10 EU countries. Methods Patients are followed from evolocumab initiation (baseline). Demographic/clinical characteristics, lipid modifying therapy (LLT) and lipid values were collected from medical records (6 months prior to evolocumab initiation through 30 months post initiation). We report interim data from patients initiating evolocumab from August 2015 with follow-up through October 2019. Results 1896 patients initiated on evolocumab as per local reimbursement criteria were included in this interim analysis (planned sample size: N=2,000). Most (1663 [88%]) had 12 months follow-up, 665 (35%) had 18 months follow-up; mean follow-up, 16.3 months. Mean (SD) age was 60.0 (10.8) years; 85% of patients had a history of CV disease (CVD), 44% had a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), 19% had type 2 diabetes, 66% were hypertensive, 7% had renal impairment and half (51%) were prior or current smokers. The majority (60%) reported statin intolerance and 42% were not receiving any LLT at evolocumab initiation. Fewer than half (805 [43%]) were receiving a statin (±ezetimibe) at evolocumab initiation; of these, most were on a high/moderate intensity (68%/22%). 12% of patients were receiving statin monotherapy. Median (Q1, Q3) baseline LDL-C was 3.98 (3.16, 5.06) mmol/L. Within 3 months of evolocumab initiation median LDL-C fell by 58% to 1.62 mmol/L. This reduction was maintained over time (Figure). Overall, 58% of patients achieved at least one LDL-C &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L during follow-up. Among patients receiving background statins and/or ezetimibe at evolocumab initiation, 67% (667/990) achieved at least one LDL-C &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L, compared with 43% (295/679) of patients not receiving background statins/ezetimibe. During follow-up, 39–46% patients received no background LLT, 40–44% received statin ±ezetimibe, 11–14% received statin monotherapy. Conclusion In Europe, patients initiated on evolocumab had baseline LDL-C levels almost 3 times higher than the present threshold for PCSK9i use, reflecting local reimbursement criteria. Evolocumab resulted in a more than 50% reduction in LDL-C; however, only approximately half of all patients achieved an LDL-C &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L. LDL-C goal attainment was higher among patients receiving evolocumab with background LLT, suggesting that achievement of EAS/ESC LDL-C goals requires multiple LLTs and a lower threshold for PCSK9i initiation. LDL-C levels after evolocumab initiation Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen

Association Between Preoperative Statin Use and Respiratory Complications After Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Statins possess pleiotropic effects, which potentially benefit noncardiovascular conditions. Previous work suggests that statins reduce inflammation and prevent acute respiratory distress syndrome and infections. However, there is a paucity of data regarding potential benefits of statins on respiratory and infectious complications, particularly after noncardiac surgery. We therefore evaluated respiratory and other complications in noncardiac surgery patients taking or not taking statins preoperatively. We obtained data from the Cleveland Clinic Perioperative Health Documentation System and evaluated medical records of 92,139 inpatients who had noncardiac surgery. Among these, 31,719 patients took statins preoperatively. Statin patients were compared to nonstatin patients on incidence of intraoperative use of albuterol and postoperative respiratory complications for primary analysis. Infectious complications, cardiovascular complications, in-hospital mortality, and duration of hospitalization were compared for secondary analyses, using inverse probability of treatment weighting to control for potential confounding. Statin use was associated with lower odds of intraoperative albuterol treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.97; P = .001; number needed to treat [NNT] = 216). Postoperative respiratory complications were also less common (OR = 0.82; 98.75% CI, 0.78-0.87; P < .001). Secondarily, statin use was associated with lower odds of infections, cardiovascular complications, in-hospital mortality, and shorter duration of hospitalization. The interaction between statin use and sex was significant (with significance criteria P < .10) for all primary and secondary outcomes except intraoperative use of albuterol. Preoperative statin use in noncardiac surgical patients was associated with slightly reduced odds of postoperative respiratory, infectious, and cardiovascular complications. However, the NNTs were high. Thus, despite the fact that statins appeared to be associated with lower odds of various complications, especially cardiovascular complications, our results do not support using statins specifically to reduce noncardiovascular complications after noncardiac surgery.

Effect of Statins on the Risk of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Statins have been proven to be cytotoxic to human cholangiocarcinoma cells by inhibiting cell division and inducing apoptosis. We aimed to determine the effect of statin use on the risk of cancer development and survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), including perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA). A total of 394 patients with ECC and hyperlipidemia who received care at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2005 and 2015 were matched by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and residency to 788 controls with hyperlipidemia. Clinical and outcome data were abstracted. The odds ratios (ORs) for risk and hazard ratios for outcomes were calculated. The mean age and standard deviation (SD) for cases and controls was 65.6years (13.8). The number of statin users in cases and controls was 73 (19%) and 403 (51%), respectively. Hepatitis C virus infection (OR,15.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.06-61.87; P<0.001) was the most significant risk factor for pCCA followed by inflammatory bowel disease and cirrhosis, whereas other liver disease, including biliary stone disease (OR,4.06; CI, 2.24-7.36; P<0.001), was the only significant risk factor for dCCA. Statin use was associated with significantly reduced risk for all ECC (OR,0.22; CI, 0.16-0.29) as well as for the subtypes pCCA (OR,0.3; CI, 0.21-0.41) and dCCA (OR,0.06; CI, 0.03-0.14), all P<0.0001. Moderate-intensity dosage was found to decrease the risk of ECC (OR,0.48; CI, 0.34-0.67; P<0.001). Comparing statin ever users to nonusers, patients with dCCA who used statins had significantly overall better survival (hazard ratio=0.53; CI, 0.29-0.97; P=0.04). This case-control study suggests that statins decrease the risk of ECC and may improve survival in patients with dCCA. Additional validation studies are warranted.

Statins and Abnormal Liver Function Tests: Is There a Correlation?

BackgroundStatins or 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are one of the most commonly prescribed medications in cardiac patients. Just like any other class of drugs, they have the potential to cause liver injury over time even with judicious use. This drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can be either direct (hepatocellular) or idiosyncratic. As with multiple other hepatic pathologies, DILI may be asymptomatic or clinically silent. Therefore, it is prudent to carry out liver function tests (LFTs) from time to time. LFTs are an inexpensive, noninvasive, and quick first-line investigation to monitor liver status. However, the pattern of liver injury with statin use is not specific and a correlation over time may not be apparent.AimsTo evaluate derangement in LFTs over time with respect to statin use and determine if a correlation exists.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational cohort. All data were collected from the online database of the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi. Patients admitted to the NICVD from July 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018, were eligible for inclusion in the study. Only patients already taking a statin (in any dose) were considered for inclusion. LFTs were recorded from the database at inclusion, post-induction at six and 12 months. Extensive workup was done and great care taken to rule out other diseases that may have affected the LFTs.ResultsTwo hundred and four patients were eventually inducted into the study after a meticulous exclusion process. The male to female ratio was 4:1. The mean duration of statin use before induction into the study was 19.92±14.34 months. Patients were predominantly using only one of two statins, i.e., rosuvastatin 20mg/day or atorvastatin 40 mg/day. Elevations of LFTs were seen with both drugs throughout the study period. These elevations were almost always <2x the upper limit of normal (ULN); greater elevations were seen with atorvastatin 40 mg/day. The derangement in LFTs persisted and improvement was not seen.ConclusionsStatins cause dose-dependent borderline elevations of liver function tests over time. These elevations are clinically and statistically insignificant and should not deter physicians from prescribing or continuing statins.

Statins may reduce disease recurrence in patients with ulcerated primary melanoma

Statins may restrict the cellular functions required for melanoma growth and metastasis. To determine whether long-term statin use commenced before diagnosis of a primary melanoma is associated with reduced risk of melanoma recurrence. We prospectively followed a cohort of patients newly diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 with localized tumour-stage T1b to T4b melanoma in Queensland, Australia. We used Cox regression analyses to examine associations between long-term statin use and melanoma recurrence for the entire cohort, and then separately by sex and by presence of ulceration, due to evidence of effect modification. Among 700 patients diagnosed with stage T1b to T4b primary melanoma (mean age 62 years, 59% male, 28% with ulcerated tumours), 94 patients (13%) developed melanoma recurrence within 2 years. Long-term statin users (n = 204, 29%) had a significantly lower risk of disease recurrence than nonusers [adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj ) 0·55, 95% confidence Interval (CI) 0·32-0·97] regardless of statin subtype or potency. Compared with nonusers of statins, risk of recurrence was significantly decreased in male statin users (HRadj 0·39, 95% CI 0·19-0·79) but not in female statin users (HRadj 0·82, 95% CI 0·29-2·27) and in statin users with ulcerated (HRadj 0·17, 95% CI 0·05-0·52) but not nonulcerated (HRadj 0·91, 95% CI 0·46-1·81) primary melanoma. Statins commenced before melanoma diagnosis may reduce the risk of melanoma recurrence, especially in men and in those with ulcerated tumours. Clinical trial evaluation of the potential role of statins in improving the prognosis of high-risk melanoma is warranted.