Background Statin Research Articles

Obicetrapib Does Not Accumulate in Adipose Tissue: Results from Studies in Man and Non-Human Primates

Background and Aims: Previous CETP inhibitors were highly lipophilic with logP of 7.2–9.2, leading to adipose tissue accumulation in the case of anacetrapib. In contrast, obicetrapib is characterized by a logP of 4.9 and terminal half-life of ∼135 hours. Studies in monkeys and humans were undertaken to determine the definitive elimination of obicetrapib.Methods: Obicetrapib was administered at doses up to 50 mg/kg/day in cynomolgus monkeys. A phase 1 trial administered doses of 1-25 mg to healthy humans, and 3 placebo-controlled, phase 2 studies in dyslipidemic humans administered obicetrapib (on background statin therapy) at 5 or 10 mg/d for 8 weeks (ROSE; n=120), 10 mg/d monotherapy or with ezetimibe for 12 weeks (ROSE2; n=119), and 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/d for 8 weeks (Japan; n=102). Plasma concentrations of obicetrapib were measured during the studies and post-treatment.Results: In monkeys, obicetrapib was not detected in any adipose tissue. A period of 13 weeks was sufficient for complete elimination from systemic circulation. The terminal half-life of obicetrapib was 121-151 hours in healthy humans. Across phase 3 studies, the median plasma concentration of obicetrapib reached 384-472 μg/L and decreased by up to 93-99% by 4 to 15 weeks post-treatment.Conclusions: Obicetrapib shows no evidence of accumulation in adipose tissue or delayed elimination from the systemic circulation supporting once daily, chronic dosing of 10 mg.

Abstract 4136741: Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors and Lipid Reduction: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors offer additional lipid reduction beyond that achieved with statins. However, the optimal PCSK9 therapy for lowering lipid levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia on background statin therapy remains unclear. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for RCTs assessing tafolecimab, evolocumab or alirocumab vs. placebo (administrated Q2W or Q4W, 12-week treatment) in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia on medium-intensity statin up to March 28, 2024. The outcomes of interest were the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or lipoprotein(a) from baseline to the 12th week. A frequentist random-effect network meta-analysis was applied to calculate MD and 95% CI using Stata 16.0 software. Results: A total of 4960 patients [PCSK9 inhibitors (n=3230), placebo (n=1730)] across 13 RCTs were included. At week 12, tafolecimab, evolocumab and alirocumab (either Q2W or Q4W) all induced significant reductions in LDL-C levels compared to placebo ( Figure ). The efficacy of evolocumab Q2W was significantly higher compared with alirocumab Q2W (MD=-18.67%, 95% Cl [-29.59%, -7.74%]), while similar LDL-C reduction was observed in tafolecimab Q2W vs. alirocumab Q2W and evolocumab Q2W vs. tafolecimab Q2W. Furthermore, tafolecimab Q4W and evolocumab Q4W were more effective in lowering LDL-C levels compared to alirocumab Q4W (tafolecimab vs. alirocumab: MD=-23.66%, 95% Cl [-32.58%, -14.74%]; evolocumab vs. alirocumab: MD=-25.84%, 95% Cl [-34.21%, -17.46%]), while there was no difference between evolocumab Q4W and tafolecimab Q4W. Lastly, the ranking of the effects for reducing lipoprotein(a) levels was as follows: tafolecimab > evolocumab> alirocumab (either Q2W or Q4W). Conclusions: In patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipidemia treated with medium-intensity statins, tafolecimab and evolocumab (either Q2W or Q4W) might be preferred choices for lowering LDL-C. Additionally, tafolecimab (either Q2W or Q4W) appears to be the most effective agent for reducing lipoprotein(a) levels.

Effects of lipid-lowering therapies on lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with dyslipidemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 64 randomised controlled trials

Abstract Background Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, there has yet to be a drug approved specifically for lowering Lp(a). There is paucity of studies evaluating the use of current lipid-lowering agents, and their effects, if any, on Lp(a). Purpose We aimed to identify and compare the effects of lipid-lowering therapies on Lp(a) levels, cardiovascular and safety outcomes, in patients with dyslipidemia. Methods A systematic search was performed across four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to 3 January 2023. The percentage change of serum Lp(a) levels, cardiovascular and safety outcomes were compared among statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin), fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab, evolocumab, bococizumab) and inclisiran, in patients with primary dyslipidemia. Frequentist network meta-analysis was performed to compare the treatment effects among different drug classes, stratified by use of background statin therapy. Results A total of 64 RCTs were included, comprising 55,256 patients. In patients on background statin therapy, PCSK9 inhibitors significantly lowered Lp(a) levels, compared with placebo (mean difference [MD] -26.8, 95% confidence intervals [95%CI] -30.8 to -22.7), ezetimibe (MD -21.6, 95%CI -31.4 to -11.8), fibrates (MD -19.4, 95%CI -37.4 to -1.5), and niacin (MD -13.8, 95%CI -25.6 to -2.1). PCSK9 inhibitors were associated with lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and similar risk of treatment-related adverse events than placebo. Comparing the PCSK9 inhibitors, evolocumab achieved greater Lp(a)-lowering than alirocumab in patients on background statin therapy (MD -11.4, 95%CI -18.6 to -4.1), including those with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Niacin also achieved 12.9% (95%CI 1.8 to 24.0) reduction in Lp(a) compared with placebo, but had a higher risk of treatment-related adverse effects than fibrates. Statin monotherapy did not affect Lp(a) levels, regardless of type or intensity of statin therapy. Ezetimibe and fibrate had no effect on Lp(a) levels. Conclusions PCSK9 inhibitors produced the greatest effect on Lp(a) levels, compared with other lipid-lowering therapies. Further studies into PCSK9 inhibitors are necessary to characterise their efficacy and safety specifically for Lp(a)-lowering, and elucidate the impact of Lp(a) reduction on cardiovascular risk.% change in Lp(a) levels

Quality of life and clusters of patient characteristics in individuals with statin intolerance

Abstract Background Statin intolerance (SI) is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events and mortality. The characteristics and symptoms of patients with SI are incompletely known. Methods The statin intolerance registry (SIR) is an observational, prospective, multicenter study that included n = 1111 patients between 2021 and 2023 in Germany. SI was defined as the inability to tolerate at least two different statins due to symptoms that resolved after statin-discontinuation. SIR baseline data were compared with the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study (n = 9983). Results The mean age was 66.1 years. Patients with SI had impaired quality of life with a mean EQ VAS score of 64.9 (SD 18.1) (Figure 1). The problems related to pain/discomfort (55.0%), mobility (32.3%), usual activity (23.9%), and anxiety/depression (20.4%). Diagnosis of depression was frequent (10.3%). 95.9% of patients with SI reported muscle symptoms that were associated with high severity of pain in 43.2% of patients. A higher percentage of SI patients was female in comparison to patients on statin in LIFE-Adult (57.6 vs. 38.2%). Women reported more depressive symptoms and lower quality of life in all domains compared to men. The symptoms increased with age. A data-driven k-means analysis based on variables predicting severity of pain while on statin therapy identified 5 clusters of SI patients (Figure 1). The clusters differed in sex, premature ASCVD, depression, quality of life, comorbidities, and expectations to tolerate statin therapy. Conclusion Overall, patients with SI have a highly impaired quality of life. Women are more frequently and more severely affected. The identified clusters may help identify patients at risk for SI and to develop individualized strategies to improve patient trajectories.

Prescription patterns of statins in cirrhotic patients: a survey among primary care physicians and cardiologists

Background Statin therapy is widely utilized for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, both as a primary and secondary measure. Despite the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases’ endorsement of statin use in cirrhotic patients, practitioners exhibit hesitancy, primarily due to concerns regarding hepatotoxicity. This study aimed to evaluate statin prescription patterns in cirrhotic patients by primary care physicians (PCPs) and cardiologists through a survey. Methods A voluntary survey via Survey Monkey with nine objective-type questions was sent to 220 PCPs and 75 cardiologists within Allegheny Health Network. Survey results were collected, and a chi square test was used to compare the two groups. A P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 64 PCPs (29.1%) and 15 cardiologists (20%) completed the survey. Overall, 12.6% did not prescribe statins for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in compensated cirrhotic patients. While all cardiologists prescribed statins for secondary prevention, over 50% preferred lower-intensity options. Conversely, 14.1% of PCPs avoided statin prescriptions for secondary prevention. Cardiologists were significantly more inclined to prescribe statins, especially for cirrhosis due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease compared to PCPs (73.3% vs 45.3%, P = 0.05). Conclusions Despite increasing evidence favoring use of statins in cirrhosis for improving portal hemodynamics and decreasing ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and mortality, there is still hesitation on the part of prescribers for the fear of worsening liver disease. Wider dissemination of current guidelines and education practices may help to bridge this gap.

Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on coronary revascularization and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis.

Benefits of pharmacologic omega-3 fatty acid administration in cardiovascular prevention are controversial. Particularly, effects on coronary revascularization are unclear; also debated are specific benefits of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). We investigated incident coronary revascularizations, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), unstable angina, and cardiovascular death, in subjects randomized to receive EPA or EPA + docosahexaenoic acid (EPA + DHA) vs. control. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted after MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library search. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Eighteen RCTs with 134 144 participants (primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention) receiving DHA + EPA (n = 52 498), EPA alone (n = 14 640), or control/placebo (n = 67 006) were included. Follow-up ranged from 4.5 months to 7.4 years. Overall, compared with controls, omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of revascularization [0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.98; P = 0.001; P-heterogeneity = 0.0002; I2 = 68%], MI (0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.06; I2 = 41%), and cardiovascular death (0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.13; I2 = 33%). Lower risk was still observed in trials where most participants (≥60%) were on statin therapy. Compared with DHA + EPA, EPA alone showed a further significant risk reduction of revascularizations (0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88; P = 0.0002; P-interaction = 0.005) and all outcomes except HF. Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduced the risk of cardiovascular events and coronary revascularization, regardless of background statin use. Eicosapentaenoic acid alone produced greater benefits. The role of specific omega-3 molecules in primary vs. secondary prevention and the potential benefits of reduced revascularizations on overall health status and cost savings warrant further research.

Atorvastatin Treatment Significantly Increased the Concentration of Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cells and Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure and Lowered the Pain Scale after Bone Marrow Cells Treatment in Patients with "No-Option" Critical Limb Ischaemia.

The present study investigated the outcomes and possible predictive factors of autologous bone marrow cells (BMCs) therapy in patients with "no-option" critical limb ischaemia (CLI). It was focused on exploring the clinical background and prior statin and renin-angiotensin system (RAS)-acting agents pharmacotherapy related to the therapeutic efficacy of BMCs treatment. In the present study, we reviewed thirty-three patients (mean age 64.9 ± 10 years; 31 males) with advanced CLI after failed or impossible revascularisation, who were treated with 40 mL of autologous BMCs by local intramuscular application. Patients with limb salvage and wound healing (N = 22) were considered as responders to BMCs therapy, and patients with limb salvage and complete ischemic wound healing (N = 13) were defined as super-responders. Logistic regression models were used to screen and identify the prognostic factors, and a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, a linear regression, and a survival curve were drawn to determine the predictive accuracy, the correlation between the candidate predictors, and the risk of major amputation. Based on the univariate regression analysis, baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) values were identified as prognostic factors of the responders, while CRP value, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) concentration were identified as prognostic factors of the super-responders. An area under the ROC curve of 0.768 indicated good discrimination for CRP > 8.1 mg/L before transplantation as a predictive factor for negative clinical response. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant dependence between the levels of baseline CRP and the concentration of BM-MNCs in transplanted bone marrow. Patients taking atorvastatin before BMCs treatment (N = 22) had significantly improved TcPO2 and reduced pain scale after BMCs transplant, compared to the non-atorvastatin group. Statin treatment was associated with reduced risk for major amputation. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Statin use was also associated with a significantly higher concentration of BM-MNCs in the transplanted bone marrow compared to patients without statin treatment. Patients treated with RAS-acting agents (N = 20) had significantly reduced pain scale after BMCs transplant, compared to the non-RAS-acting agents group. Similar results, reduced pain scale and improved TcPO2, were achieved in patients treated with atorvastatin and RAS-acting agents (N = 17) before BMCs treatment. Results of the Spearman correlation showed a significant positive correlation between CLI regression, responders, and previous therapy before BMCs transplant with RAS-acting agents alone or with atorvastatin. CRP and TcPO2 were prognostic factors of the responders, while CRP value, ABI, and BM-MNCs concentration were identified as predictive factors of the super-responders. Atorvastatin treatment was associated with a significantly increased concentration of BM-MNCs in bone marrow concentrate and higher TcPO2 and lower pain scale after BMCs treatment in CLI patients. Similarly, reduced pain scales and improved TcPO2 were achieved in patients treated with atorvastatin and RAS-acting agents before BMCs treatment. Positive correlations between responders and previous treatment before BMCs transplant with RAS-acting agents alone or with atorvastatin were significant.

How safe are proprotein convertase subtilisinekexin type 9 inhibitors in diabetes?

To examine the safety of proprotein convertase subtilisinekexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in patients with diabetes, specifically focusing on their impact on glucose metabolism. Patients with diabetes often require intensified lipid-lowering therapy. PCSK9 inhibitors can reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations by approximately 60%, and significantly reduce cardiovascular risk when added to statin therapy. Some studies have suggested an association between low LDL-C levels and an increased risk of new-onset diabetes, and genetics has almost consistently shown an increased glucose concentration and risk of diabetes. Most clinical trials have not demonstrated a deterioration in glycaemic control in patients with diabetes after the use of PCSK9 inhibitors, and they do not lead to other significant treatment-emergent adverse events. Although the majority of patients with diabetes are undergoing background statin therapy, which may mask potential adverse effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on glycaemic control, current data suggest that the benefits outweigh the risks for diabetic patients using PCSK9 inhibitors. Considering the different nature of genetic studies and of clinical trials, close monitoring of glucose parameters is necessary, especially in individuals with prediabetes.

Statin-induced Mitochondrial Priming Sensitizes Multiple Myeloma Cells to BCL2 and MCL-1 Inhibitors.

BH3 mimetics including venetoclax hold promise for treatment of multiple myeloma but rational combinations are needed to broaden efficacy. This study presents mechanistic and clinical data to support addition of pitavastatin to venetoclax regimens in myeloma. The results open a new avenue for repurposing statins in blood cancer.

Abstract 13778: Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Revascularization and Major Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Benefits of omega-3 administration in preventing cardiovascular (CV) events are controversial. In particular, while statins have been associated with significant reduction of revascularizations (Revasc), effects of omega-3 on Revasc are unclear. Aim: To metanalyze evidence on the effect of omega-3 administration on incident Revasc and CV events (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, heart failure [HF], CV death). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web-of-Science and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥500 participants comparing the effects of omega-3 formulations [decosahexanoic acid+eicosapentaenoic acid (DHA+EPA) or EPA alone] versus placebo. Results: Seventeen RCTs with participants (both primary and secondary CV prevention) randomized to DHA+EPA (n=52,498) or EPA alone (n=13,415) and controls (n=65,771) were included. Follow-up ranged from 4.5 months to 7.4 years. Significant heterogeneity emerged among studies (Figure). Overall, compared to controls omega-3 supplementation was associated with reduced risk of Revasc (Figure) and MI [0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.98; p heter =0.04; I 2 =45%; p=0.02] with no significant effect on stroke, HF, and CV death. Reduced risk of Revasc was still observed when most (≥60%) participants were already on statins (Figure). Compared to DHA+EPA, EPA alone was associated with a greater reduced risk of Revasc (Figure) and stroke [0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95], with no significant effect on HF and CV death. No significant differences were observed for DHA+EPA dose ≤0.9g/day vs >0.9g/day, or EPA alone ≤0.7 g/day vs >0.7 g/day. Conclusions: Omega-3 supplementation resulted in reduced risk of Revascularization, unaffected by background statin use. Use of EPA alone appeared to be associated with even greater benefits. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of omega-3 supplementation in preventing hard CV events

Fibrates, Hypertriglyceridemia, and CVD Risk: Where Do We Stand After the PROMINENT Trial for Triglyceride Lowering?

To evaluate recent clinical trials focusing on patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Randomized clinical trials have recently been undertaken in hypertriglyceridemic patients to determine whether effective reductions in triglycerides would improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. However, the fibric acid derivative, pemafibrate, failed to reduce cardiovascular events despite significant reductions (~ 25-35%) in triglyceride levels and despite background statin therapy. In contrast, icosapent ethyl, a highly purified omega-3 fatty acid was previously shown to reduce CVD events in hypertriglyceridemic patients, despite more modest reductions (~ 20%) in triglyceride levels in statin treated patients. The divergent results obtained in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), a group at particularly high risk of CVD, especially when coupled with other risk factors, indicates that triglyceride lowering in of itself is insufficient to offset CVD risk. Rather, the effectiveness of therapy in this high-risk cohort may be the result of the suppression of the inherent atherogenic properties associated with HTG.

The addition of evolocumab to maximal tolerated statin therapy improves walking performance in patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication (Evol-PAD study)

ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and claudication, treated with maximal tolerated statin therapy, the addition of a monthly subcutaneous injection of evolocumab for 6 months improves treadmill walking performance. BackgroundLipid lowering therapy improves walking parameters in patients with PAD and claudication. Evolocumab decreases cardiac and limb adverse events in patients with PAD; however, the effect of evolocumab on walking performance is not known. MethodsWe performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to compare maximal walking time (MWT) and pain free walking time (PFWT) in patients with PAD and claudication treated with monthly subcutaneous injections of evolocumab 420 mg (n = 35) or placebo (n = 35). We also performed measurements of lower limb perfusion, brachial flow mediated dilatation (FMD), carotid intima media thickness (IMT), and serum biomarkers of PAD disease severity. ResultsAfter six-months of treatment with evolocumab MWT increased by 37.7 % (87.5 ± 24 s) compared to 1.4 % (−21.7 ± 22.9 s) in the placebo group, p = 0.01. PFWT increased by 55.3 % (67.3 ± 21.2 s) in the evolocumab group compared to 20.3 % (8.5 ± 20.3 s) in the placebo group, p = 0.051. There was no difference in lower extremity arterial perfusion measurements. FMD increased by 42.0 ± 73.9 % (1.01 ± 0.7 %) in the evolocumab group and decreased by 16.29 ± 20.06 % (0.99 ± 0.68 %) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). IMT decreased by 7.16 ± 4.6 % (0.06 ± 0.04 mm) in the evolocumab group and increased by 6.68 ± 4.9 % (0.05 ± 0.03 mm) in the placebo group, (p < 0.001). ConclusionsThe addition of evolocumab to maximal tolerated statin therapy improves maximal walking time in patients with PAD and claudication, increases FMD, and decreases IMT. Condensed abstractPeripheral arterial disease (PAD) impairs quality of life by causing lower extremity intermittent claudication, rest pain, or amputation. Evolocumab is a monthly injectable monoclonal antibody medication that reduces cholesterol. In this study, we randomly treated patients with PAD and claudication, and on background statin therapy, with evolocumab or placebo, and found that evolocumab improves walking performance on a treadmill test by increasing maximal walking time. We also found that evolocumab decreases plasma MRP-14 levels, a marker of PAD severity.

Bempedoic acid lowers high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: Analysis of pooled data from four phase 3 clinical trials

Background and aimsHigh-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a marker for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, is reduced by bempedoic acid. We assessed the relationship between changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and hsCRP in relation to baseline statin use. MethodsPooled data from four phase 3 trials (patients on maximally tolerated statins [Pool 1] and patients receiving no or low-dose statins [Pool 2]) were used to determine the proportion of patients with baseline hsCRP ≥2 mg/L who achieved hsCRP <2 mg/L at week 12. The percentage of patients who achieved hsCRP <2 mg/L and guideline-recommended LDL-C (Pool 1, <70 mg/dL; Pool 2, <100 mg/dL) was determined for patients on statins in Pool 1 and those not on statins in Pool 2, as was the correlation between percent changes in hsCRP and LDL-C. ResultsOverall, 38.7% in Pool 1 and 40.7% in Pool 2 with baseline hsCRP ≥2 mg/L achieved hsCRP <2 mg/L with bempedoic acid, with little effect from background statin. Among patients taking a statin in Pool 1 or not taking a statin in Pool 2, 68.6% and 62.4% achieved hsCRP <2 mg/L. Both hsCRP <2 mg/L and United States guideline–recommended LDL-C were achieved more often with bempedoic acid vs. placebo (20.8% vs. 4.3%, respectively, in Pool 1 and 32.0% vs. 5.3%, in Pool 2). Changes in hsCRP and LDL-C were only weakly correlated (Pool 1, r = 0.112; Pool 2, r = 0.173). ConclusionsBempedoic acid significantly reduced hsCRP irrespective of background statin therapy; the effect was largely independent of LDL-C lowering.

Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acid as Lipid-Lowering Therapy: Inclisiran in Focus.

The PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9) enzyme interferes with the metabolism of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Inhibition of PCSK9 results in lower LDL cholesterol levels, which can be achieved by different molecular pathways. Monoclonal antibodies targeting circulating PCSK9 have shown strong and persistent effects on lowering the LDL cholesterol level, while reducing the risk of future cardiovascular events. However, this therapy requires once- or twice-monthly administration in the form of subcutaneous injection. This dosing regimen might impact the therapy adherence in cardiovascular patients who often require multiple drugs with different dosing intervals. Small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) represents a promising therapy approach for patients with elevated LDL cholesterol level despite optimized background statin therapy. Inclisiran is a synthesized siRNA which inhibits PCSK9 synthesis in the liver and provides sustained and durable lowering of LDL cholesterol with twice-yearly application and a good tolerability profile. Herein, we present an overview of the current available data and critical review of the major clinical trials which assessed safety and efficacy of inclisiran in different groups of patients with elevated LDL cholesterol level.

Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk Using Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a hepatic enzyme that regulates blood cholesterol levels by degrading low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors from the surface of hepatocytes. Studies have shown that inhibiting this molecule decreases the cardiovascularrisk in individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)by lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Two major cardiovascular outcome trials showed that the use of the PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab and evolocumab) in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a lower risk of further cardiovascular (CV) events. Information regarding the use of these monoclonal antibodies for primary prevention has also been reported by these trials. The goal of this systematic review is to describe the mechanism of PCSK9 inhibitors and further discuss their ability to reduce CV risk in high-risk populations. The search strategy was used in a systematic way using PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. We included randomized control trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and narrative reviews in English published in the last five years. Observational studies,case reports, and case studies were excluded. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool, Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2, and Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles. A total of 10 articles were included in this systematic review. These included an RCT, a systematic review, and eight narrative reviews. Our study suggested that adding PCSK9 inhibitors to background statin therapy for selected patients with high-risk factors demonstrated substantial benefits in reducing overall CV morbidity and mortality after ACS. Multiple studies have demonstrated the short-term safety of low LDL-C levels caused by these drugs. However, long-term safety must be assessed with further studies.

Effect of in-hospital evolocumab therapy on lipoprotein(a) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study and a propensity score matching analysis.

This retrospective cohort analysis included a total of 467 AMI patients with LDL-C level >2.6 mmol/L upon admission, among whom 132 received in-hospital evolocumab (140 mg every 2 weeks) plus statin (20 mg atorvastatin or 10 mg rosuvastatin per day) and the remaining 335 received statin only. Lipid profiles at 1-month follow-up were compared between the two groups. A propensity score matching analysis was also conducted based on age, sex, and baseline lipoprotein(a) at a 1:1 ratio using a 0.02 caliper. At the 1-month follow-up, the lipoprotein(a) level decreased from 27.0 (17.5, 50.6) mg/dL to 20.9 (9.4, 52.5) mg/dL in evolocumab plus statin group, but increased from 24.5 (13.2, 41.1) mg/dL to 27.9 (14.8, 58.6) mg/dL in statin only group. The propensity score matching analysis included 262 patients (131 in each group). In subgroup analysis of the propensity score matching cohort stratified by the baseline lipoprotein(a) at cutoff values of 20 and 50 mg/dL, the absolute change in lipoprotein(a) was -4.9 (-8.5, -1.3), -5.0 (-13.9, 1.9), -0.2 (-9.9, 16.9) mg/dL in three subgroups in evolocumab plus statin group, and 0.9 (-1.7, 5.5), 10.7 (4.6, 21.9), 12.2 (2.9, 35.6) mg/dL in three subgroups in statin only group. In comparison to statin only group, evolocumab plus statin group had lower lipoprotein(a) level at 1 month in all subgroups (P < 0.05). In-hospital initiation of evolocumab on a background statin therapy reduced lipoprotein(a) level at 1-month follow-up in patients with AMI. Evolocumab plus statin therapy inhibited the increase in lipoprotein(a) in statin only therapy, regardless of the baseline lipoprotein(a) level.

Bempedoic Acid: Lipid Lowering for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

The management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a central strategy for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Current United States (2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Multisociety) and European (2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society) guidelines endorse statin therapy as the first-line therapy for pharmacologic LDL-C lowering. However, in clinical practice up to 30% of patients report partial or complete intolerance to statin therapy. While the nocebo effect with statins is well described, perceived statin intolerance prevents many patients from achieving LDL-C thresholds associated with clinical benefit. Bempedoic acid is a novel, oral, non-statin lipid-l owering therapy that works by inhibiting adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase, an enzymatic reaction upstream of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in the hepatic cholesterol synthesis pathway. Bempedoic acid confers reduction in LDL-C of ~18% on background statin therapy,~21% in patients with statin intolerance, and ~38% when given in fixed-dose combination with ezetimibe. The CLEAR Outcomes trial, which enrolled high-risk primary and secondary prevention patients with reported statin intolerance and LDL-C levels ≥100 mg/dL, showed that bempedoic acid compared with placebo reduced 4-component major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 13% (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.96). Bempedoic acid also reduced 3-component MACE by 15%, myocardial infarction by 23% and coronary revascularization by 19%. The benefit was even greater in the primary prevention cohort (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89) for 4-component MACE. Bempedoic acid was associated with increases in uric acid levels and cholelithiasis, but numerically fewer events of myalgia and new-onset diabetes. These findings confirm that bempedoic acid is an effective approach to reduce cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients with statin intolerance who require further reduction in LDL-C.

The Effects of a Perindopril-Based Regimen in Relation to Statin Use on the Outcomes of Patients with Vascular Disease: a Combined Analysis of the ADVANCE, EUROPA, and PROGRESS Trials

PurposeTo study the effects of a perindopril-based regimen on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with vascular disease in relation to background statin therapy.MethodsA pooled analysis of the randomized ADVANCE, EUROPA, and PROGRESS trials was performed to evaluate CV outcomes in 29,463 patients with vascular disease treated with perindopril-based regimens versus placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of a perindopril-based regimen versus placebo in relation to statin use.ResultsAt randomization, 39.5% of the overall combined study population used statins. After a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (SD 1.0), the cumulative event-free survival was highest in the statin/perindopril group and lowest in the no statin/placebo group (91.2% vs. 85.6%, respectively, log-rank p < 0.001). In statin users (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–0.98) and non-statin users (aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74–0.87), a perindopril-based regimen was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary endpoint when compared to placebo. The additional treatment effect appeared numerically greater in non-statin users, but the observed difference was statistically nonsignificant.ConclusionOur data suggest that the treatment benefits of a perindopril-based regimen in patients with vascular disease are independent of statin use.

Evolocumab treatment reduces carotid intima-media thickness in paediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

Abstract Background Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterised by high plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Previous studies show that carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is increased in children with FH, an indicator of early ASCVD. Add-on treatment with the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, evolocumab, substantially reduced atherosclerotic lipid levels in children with heterozygous FH (HeFH) and was safe and well tolerated. The effect of evolocumab on cIMT in paediatric patients (pts) has not been investigated. Purpose To investigate the effect of evolocumab treatment on cIMT progression in paediatric pts with HeFH. Methods HAUSER-RCT was a multicenter, randomised, placebo-controlled study in which paediatric FH pts (ages 10–17 years) received monthly subcutaneous injections of evolocumab 420 mg or placebo. Of 157 pts, 150 continued to an open-label extension study (HAUSER-OLE) during which all received up to 80 weeks of monthly evolocumab 420 mg on top of stable background statin therapy. cIMT was measured by B-mode ultrasound scanning at baseline, week 24 of the RCT, and weeks 24, 48, and 80 of the OLE. cIMT was measured on anterior, lateral, and posterior imaging angles of the right and left common carotid artery. Mean thickness at each visit and mean changes from baseline were summarised by treatment received during the RCT and artery location. In addition, the largest measurements (anterior, lateral, or posterior) from a patient's left and right carotid artery were averaged to calculate a summary score. Results Mean baseline cIMT summary score was 0.568 mm (SD=0.06) for 46 placebo pts and 0.586 mm (SD=0.06) for 82 evolocumab pts. During the RCT, 37 placebo pts had a mean increase of 0.006 mm (SD=0.05) from baseline to week 24; in contrast, 76 evolocumab pts had a mean decrease of 0.003 mm (SD=0.05). Although this treatment group difference was not statistically significant (P=0.403), the pattern of increased cIMT for placebo and decreased cIMT for evolocumab was consistent across artery locations (Table). During the OLE, for pts who initially received placebo, mean cIMT summary score decreased by 0.019 mm (SD=0.04, n=34) from baseline to week 80 (P=0.007) (Figure). Pts who received evolocumab in both the RCT and OLE showed continued improvement during the OLE; at week 80, mean cIMT summary score decreased by 0.012 mm (SD=0.05, n=59) from baseline (P=0.067). For all pts at week 80 (n=128), the mean decrease in LDL-C from baseline was 35.3% (SD=28.0). Conclusions Open-label evolocumab treatment for up to 80 weeks led to reductions in mean cIMT. In this small sample of pts with FH, the data suggest that the addition of PCSK9 inhibition to background lipid-lowering therapy has the potential to reduce the risk of ASCVD progression and future cardiovascular events in this vulnerable paediatric population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen, Inc.

†Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

<h3>Lead Author's Financial Disclosures</h3> MDS has received funding/grant support from Amgen, the National Institutes of Health, and Novartis, and honorarium for consultancy from Amgen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk and Regeneron. <h3>Study Funding</h3> Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. <h3>Background/Synopsis</h3> Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. Bempedoic acid (BA) is an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor that lowers LDL-C in patients with hypercholesterolemia. <h3>Objective/Purpose</h3> To assess efficacy and safety of BA in patients with and without metabolic syndrome. <h3>Methods</h3> We investigated the lipid-lowering efficacy, safety, and effect of BA on glycemic parameters and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) according to baseline metabolic status using pooled data (n=3623) from 4 phase-3, randomized, double-blind studies in which patients were randomized 2:1 to BA or placebo (PBO) for 12-52 weeks. Patients with diabetes mellitus (n=1114) were excluded from the analyses. The remaining patients were categorized as having MetS (n=936; defined using modified IAS guidelines with BMI as a proxy for waist circumference) or nonMetS (n=1573). Assessments included absolute or % change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C, other lipid parameters, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and hsCRP; and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). <h3>Results</h3> Background statin intensity was similar between groups (Table). BA significantly lowered LDL C at week 12 vs PBO, to a greater extent in patients with MetS than nonMetS (PBO corrected % change from baseline of −22.3 MetS; −18.4 nonMetS; interaction P=.0472). BA also significantly lowered total cholesterol, non-HDL-C, and apo B % change at week 12 vs PBO to a similar extent in both subgroups. In patients with MetS, absolute reductions in HbA1c and FPG were significantly greater with BA vs PBO; changes in HbA1C and FPG were not significantly different for BA vs PBO in the nonMetS group (interaction P=.0003 and .0017, respectively). hsCRP % change from baseline was substantially lowered with BA vs PBO in both groups (insignificant interaction based on log of hsCRP absolute change). The incidence of TEAEs was comparable in both subgroups.subgroups and greater lowering of LDL-C, HbA1c, and FPG levels in patients with MetS vs nonMetS. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Overall, BA demonstrated comparable safety in both metabolic subgroups and greater lowering of LDL-C, HbA1c, and FPG levels in patients with MetS vs nonMetS.