J. S. Bach's Meine Seel' erhebt den Herren (BWV 10) as Chorale Cantata and Magnificat Paraphrase1 MarkA. Peters At undertook new the church beginning a cantata monumental of his for second each project Sunday year in which in and Leipzig, feast he composed day J.S. of Bach the a undertooka monumental projectin whichhe composed a new churchcantataforeach Sundayand feastday of the liturgical year,forty cantataswritten fromthe FirstSundayafter Trinity (June 11,1724)totheFeastofAnnunciation (March25,1725). The sheervolumeof compositionis impressive, and scholarshave lauded these forty cantatasas exemplary not onlyamong Bach's outputbutalso amongthelarger corpusofchurch cantatacomposition in earlyeighteenth-century Germany.But even beyond the numberof cantatascomposed in such a timeperiod - a practice whichwas in factcommon formanyof Bach's contemporaries, includingsuch major composers as ChristophGraupner,Georg PhilippTelemann, and Gottfried HeinrichStölzel - itis noteworthy thatBachsetforhimself a particular compositional challenge, thatof basingeachofthecantatas inthecycleon a choraletextandmelody. Overthecourseoftheseforty "choralecantatas," as they havecome 1This article isbased onpapers presented atthe biennial meeting ofthe American Bach Society May 2008 atLehigh University and atthe annual meeting ofthe Forum onMusic andChristian Scholarship held February 2009 atthe University ofNotre Dame. Thank you tocolleagues ateach meeting whoresponded tomy work and particularly tomy session chairs, Robin Leaver and Stephen Crist respectively. Thank you also toDonFranklin and Markus Rathey for reading and commenting onearlier drafts ofthe article, toEric Chafe for sharing his yet unpublished research onBWV 243, and toMelUnger andLaura Kennelly for their careful editing. 29 30 Bach tobe known, Bach engageda widerangeofLutheran hymns inways evernewandinventive.2 Considered inrelation tohiscycleofchoralecantata composition, Bach's BWV 10,Meine Seel'erhebt den Herren ,composedfortheFeast of Visitation(MariaeHeimsuchung, July2, 1724), can be seen as typical inmany ways. As a choralecantata, itisbasedon a pre-existent textand its associatedmelody.Furthermore, thistextwas clearly appropriate foritsliturgical occasion,for"Meine Seele erhebtden Herren" - MartinLuther'sGerman translation of the Magnificat, Mary'ssongofpraiserecordedin theGospel ofLuke- is theonly GermantextlistedfortheFeastofVisitation intheLeipziger KirchenStaat , a volumethatsummarizes theliturgical orderforthecity while also serving as a devotionaltextcontaining prayers and hymntexts (theLatinMagnificat textis likewise listed).3 However,itdiffers fromtheotherworksof thecyclesincethe modelforCantata10 is nota choraleperse. It is rather a canticle, a prosebiblicaltextcomposedofthequotationofLuke 1:46-55 plus theGermanversion oftheGloriaPatri, thedoxologicalformula with whichPsalmsandcanticles typically concluded.Nonetheless, Bach's unknown librettist crafted thetextofCantata10insimilar fashion to that oftheother choralecantatas: theopeningandclosing movements and one middlemovement(movements 1, 5, and 7) quote "Meine Seele" direcdy, whiletheinnermovements compriserecitative and aria textsinspiredby the remaining versesof the model. Broadly important studies ofBach's chorale cantatas include Alfred Dürr, "Bach's Chorale Cantatas," inCantors atthe Crossroads: Essays onChurch Music inHonor ofWalter E. Buskin, ed.Johannes Riedel (St. Louis: Concordia, 1967); Friedhelm Krummacher, Bachs Zyklus der Choralkantaten: Aufgaben und Lösungen (Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1995); andMarkus Rathey, "Choralkantaten," inBachs Kantaten , BachHandbuch , vol.1,eds.Reinmar Emans andSven Hiemke (Laaber: LaaberVerlag , 2012). ъ Leipziger Kirchen-Staat (Leipzig: Friedrich Groschuff, 1710), 121-22. Inany discussion ofthe relationship between a chorale cantata andthe chorale onwhich itisbased, confusion caneasily arise because both share the same title. Inthis article, I attempt toclarify the difference through terminology (referring specifically to"cantata" or "BWV10"for Bach's setting) andalsothrough type setting (italicÌ2ed Meine Seel * erhebt den Herren for Bach's cantata and"Meine Seele erhebt denHerren" inquotes for the model). Meine Seel'erhebt den Herren (BWV 10) 31 speaking, Bach'scompositional approachissimilar tothat inhisother choralecantatas: inmovements thatquotethe"MeineSeele" text, he employs thetuneassociatedwithit,whiletherecitatives andariasare newly composedwithno reference to thecantusfirmus. Butwhenexaminedmoreclosely, BWV 10 is in factone of the moreunusualexplorations thatBach undertook inthechoralecycle duetotheuniquenature ofhismodel."MeineSeele"isnotbasedon a poeticchoraletext, as areallofBach's otherchoralecantatas, but rather on a Bibleverse.Furthermore, thesetting isnotjustofbiblical quotationbut,even moresignificantly, of one of thebiblicaltexts heardmostoften inLeipzig'schurches. Mary's"Magnificat" waswellknownto Leipzigparishioners bothin itsLatin("Magnificat") and German("MeineSeele")translations. Finally, thetuneassociated with thisbiblicaltextis not a choralemelody, but rathera psalm tone formula. WhileBachemployed compositional conventions associated withhis otherchoralecantatas,he was forcedto findinventive solutions tothechallenges presented bythedistinctive features ofhis model,especially in thosemovements thatquotethe"Meine Seele" textandtune(movements 1,5,and7). Thisarticle addresses theexceptional textual andmusicalfeatures of BWV 10 withinthe contextof theMagnificat's importancein Leipzig.Itarguesthatthesingular nature ofthecantata's model - the GermanMagnificat inbiblical quotation anditsassociatedpsalmtone melody - can help us to understand thecantatain a different way fromhowwe understand theremainder ofBach's choralecantatas, thosebaseduponpoetictextsandmoreelaboratechoralemelodies. Itthusreveals thespecialnature ofthecantata asbothchoralecantata andMagnificat paraphrase, situating BWV 10within richly interwoven traditions ofliturgical, poetic,andcompositional practice. "Magnificat" and'Meine...
Read full abstract