Axillary View Research Articles

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures: Is the Bigliani-Flatow Stem Suitable for Tuberosity Fixation and Healing?

Background/Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical, functional, and radiographic results of patients affected by three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, to investigate whether a prosthetic stem nonspecifically designed for fractures (i.e., the Bigliani-Flatow stem) promotes tuberosities' healing, and to evaluate the impact of tuberosity fixation and healing on the outcomes. Methods: Patients' data such as gender, age, side and dominancy, comorbidities, complications during or after surgery, and time lapse between trauma and surgery were prospectively collected. The type of fixation of the stem, the thickness and type of liner, and whether the tuberosities were fixed or not were also recorded. The Constant score weighted on the contralateral limb, QuickDASH, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Subjective Shoulder Value were collected. Tuberosities' healing was assessed with X-rays (anteroposterior, Grashey, and axillary views). Results: Overall, 34 patients were included, with an average follow-up of 42 months. Tuberosities were reinserted in 24 cases and their healing rate was 83%. The mean values were the following: a Constant score of 64, Oxford Shoulder Score of 39, Subjective Shoulder Value of 71, and QuickDASH score of 27. There were no significant differences in the scores or range of motion between patients with tuberosities healed, reabsorbed, or not reattached. There was a better external rotation in the group with healed tuberosities and a longer duration of surgery to reattach tuberosities. Conclusions: The treatment of proximal humerus fractures with the Bigliani-Flatow stem is associated with good clinical and functional results. The healing rate of the tuberosities was high and comparable, if not even better, than the mean rates reported for the stems dedicated to fractures of the proximal humerus and was, therefore, also appropriate for this indication.

Management of type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A Delphi consensus survey by Shoulder & Elbow Society, India (SESI)

PurposeThe study aimed to report the results of the Delphi survey conducted by the Shoulder, Elbow Society India (SESI), to achieve consensus on ambiguous topics in managing type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. MethodsThis study was based on responses from the Shoulder Elbow Society India (SESI) panel of peer-selected twenty senior surgeons practicing shoulder orthopedics. They participated in two rounds of the survey to obtain consensus on several topics pertaining to the management of type III ACJ dislocations. Consensus was achieved when at least 70 % of the panel members selected at least a 4-point on a 5-point Likert scale. ResultsOur Delphi survey reached a consensus on seven topics of ambiguity. An anteroposterior and axillary view of the shoulder without any traction or weight in hand is sufficient in the setting of a suspected type III ACJ dislocation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely indicated in type III ACJ dislocation. Either cross-arm adduction X-rays or clinical examination may be used to distinguish between ISAKOS (International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee surgery and Orthopaedics Sports medicine) IIIA and B classification of ACJ to identify stable and unstable injuries. Conservative treatment can be offered to patients who have stable injuries and who are not high-demand individuals in acute type III ACJ dislocations. In conservative management of type III ACJ dislocation, a two-week sling suffices. Jones strapping has no clear advantage over a shoulder sling. Coracoclavicular reconstruction with an autograft is an acceptable way to treat symptomatic, chronic grade III ACJ dislocation. ConclusionThe survey helped achieve consensus on several controversial issues related to type III ACJ dislocations. However, there remains ambiguity on the definition of chronicity of such dislocations, the necessity of bilateral Zanca views, and the duration of conservative trial before switching to a surgical line of management.

The current standard of the shoulder trauma series in Ireland – A national audit

Objectives/aimsThe primary aim of this study was to assess the current standard of shoulder radiographs in Ireland. The secondary aim of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons in Ireland are of the opinion that a national protocol is required, and what this protocol should consist of. MethodsA national audit of shoulder trauma series x-rays performed in emergency departments was conducted. The number and type of views performed was recorded. The anteroposterior (AP) and axillary or Velpeau views were assessed to determine if they met pre-defined audit criteria. Consultant orthopaedic surgeons working in public trauma hospitals were invited to participate in an online survey by email. ResultsThe number of shoulder trauma series included in this audit was 789. The majority of patients had two views performed (75.92%, n ​= ​599) and 21.17% (n ​= ​167) had an axillary or Velpeau view. The AP view met the audit criteria in 23.09% (n ​= ​181) of cases. The survey response rate was 70.8% (n ​= ​17). 88.2% (n ​= ​15) of surgeons agreed that three views should be performed for a shoulder trauma series and 94.12% (n ​= ​16) agreed that an axillary or Velpeau view should be included. The majority of surgeons surveyed (94%, n ​= ​16) are in favour of establishing a national protocol. ConclusionThe current standard shoulder trauma series in Irish hospitals consists of two views, most frequently a thoracic AP and a scapular Y view. We propose the introduction of a national protocol consisting of three views: Grashey AP, Scapular Y, and an axillary or Velpeau view.

Classification and measurement of displacement of isolated greater tuberosity fractures: Intra and interobserver reliability.

Literature demonstrates variability in the amount of displacement of isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fractures and measurement techniques that orthopaedic surgeons deem warrant surgical intervention. This study aims to assess the intra and interobserver reliability for classifying and measuring the displacement amount for isolated GT fractures. Eight surgeons, consisting of four shoulder specialists and four trainee surgeons, reviewed 25 plain radiographs on two separate occasions, 3 months apart. They were required to morphologically classify the GT fracture, measure the displacement distance on anteroposterior and axillary views, calculate the GT displacement ratio, and state whether they would offer surgical treatment. There was a lack of good reliability for the classification of the depression and avulsion fracture types. There was good intraobserver but poor interobserver consistency in classifying the split-type fractures. The measurement of the displacement distance showed good intraobserver reliability, but not as good interobserver agreement. Also, the displacement ratio calculated revealed poor consistency. We found good agreement between and within the raters for the treatment decision. No significant difference was noted when comparing the senior surgeons to the junior surgeons. This study has revealed ongoing inconsistency in the classification and measurement of isolated GT fractures.

Coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: clinical and imaging outcomes

BackgroundThere are few clinical and radiographic studies of coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. Additionally, reported AC joint reduction rates vary. HypothesisArthroscopically assisted double-bundle semitendinosus tendon autografts with CC and AC ligament reconstruction for AC joint reconstruction provide AC joint stability and improved function at the final visit. MethodsIn this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, 21 patients surgically treated for chronic AC joint dislocation (Rockwood III–V) were assessed clinically and radiographically preoperatively, and at day 1, 3 months, 12 months, and at a final visit (> 24 months) postoperatively. Clinical assessments included Constant and ASES scores. The CC vertical distance (CCD) on the affected and unaffected sides [CCD ratio (%)] on the anterosuperior view were measured. AC joint vertical reduction loss was defined as an increase in the CCD ratio of > 25%. Horizontal AC joint instability was evaluated on axillary views. Pearsons’ correlation coefficients were generated to examine the relationships among postoperative clinical scores, CCD ratio, interval from injury to surgery, and age at the time of surgery. ResultsTwenty-one shoulders in 21 patients (mean age, 40.0 years at the time of surgery; 16 men, 5 women) were evaluated with a mean 31.7-month follow-up period. The mean Constant scores, ASES scores, and CCD ratios significantly improved from preoperatively to the final visit [57.4 ± 10.1, 49.1 ± 12.1, 101.6 ± 64.1 preoperatively; 89.6 ± 5.3, 96.5 ± 4.2, 9.9 ± 34.5 at the final visit, respectively (P < 0.001 for all)]. Vertical AC and horizontal AC joint instability were observed in four shoulders (19.0%) and in one shoulder (4.8%), respectively. However, there was no significant correlation between the increase in CCD and clinical scores at the final visit (Constant score; r = 0.179, P = .438: ASES score; r = -0.260, P = .256) or the interval from injury to surgery (r = 0.099, P = .669) or age at the time of surgery (r = 0.019, P = .935). No clinical complications were associated with clinical symptoms. ConclusionsPatients who underwent the index procedure achieved significant improvement in shoulder function without complications related clinical symptom after a mean follow-up interval of 31.7 months. In contrast, the rates of total ACJ instability in the vertical and horizontal planes were unsatisfactory but compatible with those in previous studies.

THE PREVALENCE AND PROFILE OF AFRICAN PATIENTS WITH OS ACROMIALE THAT PRESENT WITH SHOULDER PAIN AT A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN PRETORIA, SOUTH AFRICA

Os acromiale is a developmental defect caused by failure of fusion of the anterior epiphysis of the acromion between the ages of 22 and 25. The prevalence of os acromiale in the general population ranges from 1.4% to 15%. Os acromiale has been reported as a contributory factor to shoulder impingement symptoms and rotator cuff injuries, despite being a common incidental observation. In this retrospective study, we examined the prevalence of os acromiale in black African patients with shoulder pain.We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 119 patients who presented with atraumatic and minor traumatic shoulder pain at a single institution over a one-year period. Anteroposterior, scapula Y-view, and axillary view plain images were initially evaluated for the presence of os acromiale, and this was corroborated with axial MRI image findings. Patients with verified os acromiale had their medical records reviewed to determine their first complaint and the results of their clinical examination and imaging examination.Radiographs and MRI on 24 patients (20%) revealed an osacromiale. This cohort had a mean age of 59.2 years, and there were significantly more females (65%) than males. Meso-acromion was identified as the most prevalent type (n=11), followed by pre-os acromion (n=7). All patients underwent bilateral shoulder x-rays, and 45 percent of patients were found to have bilateral meso- acromion. Most patients (70%) were reported to have unstable os acromiale with subacromial impingement symptoms, and nine patients (36%) had confirmed rotator cuff tears based on clinical and Mri findings. Surgery was necessary for 47% of the 24 patients with confirmed Os acromiale (arthroscopic surgery, n=7; open surgery, n=1) in order to treat their symptomsThe prevalence of os acromiale in our African patients with atraumatic shoulder symptoms is greater than that reported in the general population. Os acromiale is a rare condition that should always be considered when evaluating shoulder pain patients.

Deep learning to automatically classify very large sets of preoperative and postoperative shoulder arthroplasty radiographs

Joint arthroplasty registries usually lack information on medical imaging owing to the laborious process of observing and recording, as well as the lack of standard methods to transfer the imaging information to the registries, which can limit the investigation of various research questions. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can automate imaging-feature identification with high accuracy and efficiency. With the purpose of enriching shoulder arthroplasty registries with organized imaging information, it was hypothesized that an automated AI algorithm could be developed to classify and organize preoperative and postoperative radiographs from shoulder arthroplasty patients according to laterality, radiographic projection, and implant type. This study used a cohort of 2303 shoulder radiographs from 1724 shoulder arthroplasty patients. Two observers manually labeled all radiographs according to (1) laterality (left or right), (2) projection (anteroposterior, axillary, or lateral), and (3) whether the radiograph was a preoperative radiograph or showed an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty or a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. All these labeled radiographs were randomly split into developmental and testing sets at the patient level and based on stratification. By use of 10-fold cross-validation, a 3-task deep-learning algorithm was trained on the developmental set to classify the 3 aforementioned characteristics. The trained algorithm was then evaluated on the testing set using quantitative metrics and visual evaluation techniques. The trained algorithm perfectly classified laterality (F1 scores [harmonic mean values of precision and sensitivity] of 100% on the testing set). When classifying the imaging projection, the algorithm achieved F1 scores of 99.2%, 100%, and 100% on anteroposterior, axillary, and lateral views, respectively. When classifying the implant type, the model achieved F1 scores of 100%, 95.2%, and 100% on preoperative radiographs, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty radiographs, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty radiographs, respectively. Visual evaluation using integrated maps showed that the algorithm focused on the relevant patient body and prosthesis parts for classification. It took the algorithm 20.3 seconds to analyze 502 images. We developed an efficient, accurate, and reliable AI algorithm to automatically identify key imaging features of laterality, imaging view, and implant type in shoulder radiographs. This algorithm represents the first step to automatically classify and organize shoulder radiographs on a large scale in very little time, which will profoundly enrich shoulder arthroplasty registries.

Is coracoid fracture with ac dislocation an unusual case

The coracoid process is a unique anatomical structure that extends anteriorly from the scapula in a hook-shaped manner, with variations in size, shape, and orientation among individuals. Although uncommon, fractures of the coracoid process may occur and can be difficult to detect on regular X-rays due to their morphology. In this case study, we report on a 46-year-old daily wage worker who presented to the emergency department with left shoulder pain and limited mobility following a traffic collision. Initial X-rays revealed only an acromioclavicular joint dislocation, but further evaluation with a CT scan confirmed a coracoid fracture with minor displacement. Despite the concurrent dislocation, we opted for conservative treatment, and the fracture had completely healed after six weeks of physical therapy. The use of specific shoulder X-ray views, such as the scapula Y or axillary view is recommended to rule out coracoid fractures, while CT scans are considered the gold standard for diagnosis. Treatment options for coracoid fractures may range from non-operative management to surgical repair, depending on the type of fracture. Our case report highlights a rare occurrence of a coracoid process fracture with acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated conservatively.

The Hertel classification can't predict the risk of humeral head osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis using an anterolateral approach

BackgroundProximal humeral fractures can progress to osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Hertel developed a binary classification system (12 subtypes) and demonstrated that some patterns have more risk to develop osteonecrosis. Hertel described the prevalence and the risk factors for Humeral head osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis using a Deltopectoral approach. Few studies have evaluated the prevalence and the capacity of Hertel's classification to predict Humeral Head osteonecrosis following osteosynthesis of proximal Humeral fractures through the anterolateral approach. The objectives of this study were to correlate osteonecrosis predictors established by the Hertel classification with the risk of developing osteonecrosis and its prevalence after osteosynthesis using the anterolateral approach. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who underwent osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures using an anterolateral approach. Patients were divided into two groups: high risk for necrosis (group 1) and low risk for necrosis (group 2) according to Hertel's criteria. The overall prevalence of osteonecrosis and the prevalence in each group were calculated. A radiological examination was performed in the true anteroposterior (Grashey), scapular, and axillary views, before and after the operation (minimum 1 year after surgery). A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the pattern of the temporal evolution of osteonecrosis. The groups were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The unpaired t-test (parametric variables – age) and the Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric time between trauma and surgery) were used. ResultsIn total, 39 patients were evaluated. The postoperative follow-up time was 14.5 ± 3.3 months. The time to onset of necrosis was 14.1 ± 3.9 months. Sex, age, and time between trauma and surgery did not influence the risk of necrosis. Type 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12, or fractures with posteromedial head extension less than or equal to 8 mm, or diaphysis deviation greater than 2 mm, as well as grouping did not influence the risk for osteonecrosis. ConclusionsHertel's criteria were not able to predict the development of osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures performed through the anterolateral approach. The total prevalence of osteonecrosis was 17.9% with a tendency toward an increased incidence after 1 year of surgical treatment.

Functional Outcome of Open Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

OBJECTIVES To find the functional outcome of the open Latarjet method for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. METHODOLOGY The current retrospective study was conducted at the Orthopedic and Trauma Department of the Khyber Teaching Hospital in Peshawar from September 2020 to August 2021. A total of 31 patients were included in the study, of which 29 were males and 2 were females. A detailed medical history was obtained through physical examination, and all necessary laboratory tests were requested. AP and axillary views of plain X-ray radiographs were taken. We used a CT scan on all the patients to calculate the humeral and glenoid bone loss. We had all patients undergo an MRI to rule out soft tissue pathology. Six months after surgery, the outcome was graded using the Constant Murley Score on a good, good, fair, and poor scale. RESULTS In this study open Latarjet procedure was done in 31 patients with 29 males (93.4%) and two females (6.45%). The right-sided shoulder was involved in 24 (77.14 %) patients, while the left shoulder was involved in 7 patients (22.58%). A bipolar lesion in the shoulder with bone loss was seen on the glenoid side at 17.5% (range 10-25%), and the humeral side was 22.5%. Follow-up was done for six months in which 22 patients had a very good outcome (70.96%), six patients had a good outcome(19.35%), two patients had a fair outcome(6.45%), and one patient had a poor outcome(3.22%). There were no major complications seen like graft fractures, graft malposition, neurovascular compromise, and hardware breakage CONCLUSION Recurrent anterior shoulder instability can be effectively treated with open Latarjet with excellent functional outcomes and a very low complication rate and recurrence.

Acromioclavicular joint separation: Retrospective study of non-operative and surgical treatment in 38 patients with grade III or higher injuries and a minimum follow-up of 1 year

IntroductionAcromioclavicular (AC) joint separation is a common shoulder injury. When the injury is graded as type III or higher in the Rockwood classification, surgical treatment can be proposed. However, an increasing number of practitioners are shifting back to conservative treatment as it is associated with fewer complications and seemingly close functional outcomes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the functional recovery of operated and non-operated patients with grade III or higher AC joint injuries. Secondarily, the reliability and relevance of the Rockwood classification was evaluated within and between raters. Materials and methodsWe did a retrospective two-center study of 38 patients treated between 2014 and 2020. The clinical evaluation involved various functional outcome scores (Constant, QuickDASH, ASES, UCLA, SSV, STT) and a pain assessment (VAS). Return to sports and to work was also documented. The radiological evaluation consisted of Zanca AP and lateral axillary views immediately after the injury and at each radiographic follow-up visit until the final visit. An intra- and inter-rater analysis was also done for the Rockwood classification. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the functional scores (Constant score surgery group=91, nonoperative group=83; p=0.09) or the pain on VAS at the final assessment. Return to work and to sports was significantly faster in patients treated non-operatively. No complication was found in the non-operated patients, while nine of the operated patients suffered a complication. The inter-rater reliability of the Rockwood classification was found to be poor (kappa=0.08) to fair (kappa=0.35), while the intra-rater reliability was moderate (kappa=0.6) to good (kappa=0.63). Discussion/conclusionNo matter which treatment is used, the functional outcomes and patient satisfaction level a minimum of 1 year after the injury appear to be identical. Thus, surgery should be only for patients whose AC joint is painful 7 days after the injury (VAS>7) and whose function has not improved. For young and athletic patients or for patients who simply want to regain nearly normal function, it is important to remember that the time to return to work and sports is longer with surgical management and to take into consideration the potential postoperative complications. While none of the patients who received the non-operative treatment required a secondary stabilizing surgery, this is a possible recourse. Level of evidenceIII.

Wrestler's Shoulder

History: 14 year old male with left shoulder pain after injury during wrestling meet. He was participating in wrestling meet 2 days prior when he was thrown to the mat. He landed on his left elbow and felt immediate pain in his shoulder, was unable to move the shoulder due to pain. He has decreased range of motion and weakness with shoulder movement, pain with moving, lifting, and sleeping. Denies any radiating pain, numbness/tingling or history of prior shoulder injuries. Physical Examination: No obvious deformity, no bony tenderness to palpation. Active ROM is forward flexion to 140 degrees with pain, abduction to 120 degrees with pain, external rotation with elbow at side to 20 degrees with pain, internal rotation to L3 with pain. Passive ROM full in all directions. The belly-press test, lift-off tests are abnormal, and the bear hug test shows weakness. Strength 4/5 of the infraspinatus, 4/5 of supraspinatus with pain. Neer/Hawkins, Obrien's signs negative. Neurovascularly intact in the bilateral upper extremities. Differential Diagnosis: Humeral, glenoid or scapular fracture, Rotator cuff tear, AC joint dislocation Final/Working Diagnosis: Fracture to base of coracoid process, Avulsion fracture of lesser tuberosity of humerus Tests and Results: Xray L shoulder: Humeral head high-riding. Widening of the left coracoid on axillary view. Widening of the AC joint. Humeral physes open, normal and symmetric compared to contralateral shoulder. MRI L shoulder: Minimally displaced fracture through base of the coracoid process, medially-displaced, lesser tuberosity physeal fracture. Hemarthrosis of the glenohumeral joint. Edema within subscapularis muscle belly. No rotator cuff full-thickness tears. Treatment and Outcomes: Athlete was referred to an Orthopaedic surgeon and underwent lesser tuberosity avulsion repair, coracoid ORIF, and closed treatment of AC joint instability. Patient immobilized in a sling for 6 weeks post-operatively. Passive ROM was initiated at 2 weeks post-operatively. Active ROM was allowed at 6 weeks progressing to full active elevation. Athlete was allowed to begin weight-lifting as tolerated, running and non-contact practice at 8 weeks. Post-operative course was uncomplicated and the athlete was cleared for full return at 12 weeks post-operatively.

North American musculoskeletal ultrasound scanning protocol of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand: update of a Delphi Consensus Study.

There has been an increase in the proficiency and utilization of ultrasound among North American rheumatologists over the past decade. This study aims to create an updated upper extremity scanning protocol to inform ultrasound curriculum development for the American College of Rheumatology affiliated fellowship programs and guide clinical practice patterns in North America. Three Delphi survey rounds were used to reach consensus on tiered-mastery designations for scan views of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand joints. The survey was disseminated by Qualtrics™ to 101 potential participants with ultrasound experience. High agreement was defined as having ≥ 85% consensus and final tier designation as > 50% agreement for a preferred tier. Changes in responses were evaluated by McNemar's chi-square test. Consensus was achieved for 70% of scan views of the upper extremity joints. Two views-ulnar transverse view of the wrist and the radial/ulnar orthogonal views over metacarpophalangeal joints 2 and 5 of the hand-were upgraded from tier 2 to tier 1. The suprascapular transverse and the axillary longitudinal views of the shoulder were downgraded from tier 2 to tier 3. A new anterior transverse view of the elbow was added to the protocol with tier 1 designation. This study reflects the current opinions of North American rheumatologists for scanning upper extremity joints and provides support for the updated protocol and guidance for educators in rheumatology ultrasound. Key Points • Ultrasound scan views of the metacarpophalangeal, wrist, elbow, and glenohumeral joint recesses and views of the biceps and rotator cuff tendons at the shoulder were perceived as essential views of the upper extremity scanning protocol for rheumatologists to master and perform routinely. • A targeted scanning approach of the upper extremity joints may be considered when focalsymptoms are present. • The North American Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Scanning Protocol shares some similarities with existing musculoskeletal ultrasound protocols of other specialties and worldwide rheumatology societies but varies in the extent of examination and emphasis on certain specialty-specific focuses.

Fluoroscopic measurements of the glenohumeral joint position and space in true anteroposterior and axillary views – a reliability study

Two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy has been used in shoulder pathologies to estimate the humeral head position (HHP) in the true anteroposterior (AP) view. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the reliability estimating it in the axillary view and in measuring the shoulder joint space width (JSW). True AP view images (n=36) of subjects with adhesive capsulitis were taken in supine in multiple arm abduction positions. The axillary view images (n=48) were taken in supine and prone in 75° of abduction. The HHP was assessed in the glenoid reference frame. The position and radius of the humeral head along with the superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, and middle JSWs were measured in each image. All the images were coded and randomly presented twice to a physiotherapist at a gap of 48-72 h for intra-rater reliability and to 2 therapists and an orthopaedic surgeon for inter-rater reliability. Reliability was expressed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). In both the views, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability was excellent for the radius of the humeral head (inter-rater – 0.95-0.97 and intra-rater -0.98)], moderate (ICC: 0.70 and 0.76), and excellent (ICC: 0.89 and 0.93) for HHP. The reliability for JSWs was moderate to good (ICC: 0.66-0.82) for inter-rater and good to excellent (ICC: 0.75-0.95) for intra-rater analysis. The SEM for HHP and JSWs were &lt;0.4 mm for intra-rater analysis, and &lt;0.7 mm for inter-rater reliability in both views. The study demonstrated that the glenohumeral arthrokinematic parameters can be measured with good to excellent levels of reliability when using 2 D fluoroscopy. The study is part of a clinical trial (Clinical Trial Registry India: CTRI/2018/12/016657).

Clinical Evaluation and Instrumental Diagnostics in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

The aim was to improve the diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation by studying the capabilities and characteristics of clinical and instrumental diagnostic methods. The idea is expressed that modern clinical and instrumental diagnostic methods comprise a large number of techniques, but no single algorithm for diagnosing injury to the AC joint has been developed. A gold standard for investigating and diagnosing acute AC joint dislocation does not currently exist. A retrospective study of the characteristics and capabilities of clinical and instrumental diagnostic methods was performed in 152 patients with traumatic shoulder pathology. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I of 102 patients (67%) with acromioclavicular joint dislocation type III-VI according to Rockwood classification and Group II of 50 patients (33%) with a partial tear of the rotator cuff. Clinical and instrumental examinations involved specific provocative tests; the radiological diagnostics comprised conventional radiographs with the Zanca, axillary and Alexander views, and CT, MRI, and ultrasound examinations. The characterization of examination methods was based on the records of patients in Group I and II. The most sensitive clinical test to establish Rockwood type V of acromioclavicular joint dislocation was the Paxinos test (91%). The lowest sensitivity across the tests used was observed with the active compression test to diagnose type IV of dislocation (50%). As regards the X-ray examination, the axial view was 100% sensitive for detecting type IV and VI AC joint dislocation. The Zanca view is highly sensitive for patients with Rockwood type V and Alexander view for Rockwood type III and V dislocations. The accuracy of ultrasound work-up in Group I was 95%, with 96% sensitivity and 93% specificity, while MRI accuracy was 97%, with 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity, and CT accuracy was 81%, with 83% sensitivity and 75% specificity. 1. Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the X-ray examination revealed the absence of a 100% effective X-ray view for type III and V AC joint dislocation. 2. The accuracy and sensitivity of the ultrasound, MRI, and CT examinations are high. 3. There is currently no consensus on a protocol to view acute AC joint injuries. 4. Complete and timely early diagnosis of acromioclavicular dislocation allows for a diffe-rentiated approach to surgical treatment tactics, preventing possible complications and restoring the function of the injured shoulder joint to the fullest extent.

Radiographic and clinical characterization of coracoid fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis

Coracoid fracture is a rare injury. The aim of this study is to present the demographics, clinical and radiologic characteristics, and outcomes of coracoid fracture in a cohort of 32 patients. We queried our institutional electronic medical record database (years 2012-2020) to identify patients with coracoid fractures using specific International Classification of Disease-10 codes. Demographic data, injury details including mechanism of injury and associated injuries, imaging performed, and treatment outcomes were obtained from retrospective chart review. A radiologist reviewed all available imaging studies (radiographs/CT/MRI) and classified the fractures according to Ogawa and Eyres classifications. Missed diagnoses were determined by comparing initial imaging reports with the follow-up imaging obtained in the office. Thirty-two patients with coracoid fractures were identified during the study period. Sixteen fractures (50%) occurred in the setting of low-energy trauma. Twelve fractures were missed on initial radiographs, and diagnosis with three-view radiographs (AP, scapular-Y and axillary) was 88% compared to 33% (p < 0.03) with two views (AP, scapular-Y). The majority of fractures were non-displaced (94%), and 56% were Ogawa Type-II fractures. Associated injuries were seen in 81% of patients. Most fractures (94%) were treated without surgery with excellent outcomes. Coracoid fractures continue to be a rare injury. In contrast to previous studies, in this case series of 32 patients, half of the fractures were associated with low-energy trauma, which correlated with higher percentage of non-displaced fractures and Ogawa Type-II fractures. Addition of the axillary view in the trauma radiographic series significantly improved the initial fracture detection rate. Retrospective study.

Subluxation in the Arthritic Shoulder.

The term "subluxation" means partial separation of the joint surfaces. In the arthritic shoulder, "arthritic glenohumeral subluxation" refers to displacement of the humeral head on the surface of the glenoid. The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation can be measured using radiography with standardized axillary views or computed tomography (CT). Shoulders with a type-B1 or B2 glenoid may show more posterior subluxation on an axillary radiograph that is made with the arm in an elevated position than on a CT scan that is made with the arm at the side. The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation is not closely related to glenoid retroversion. The position of the humeral head with respect to the plane of the scapula is related to glenoid retroversion and is not a measure of glenohumeral subluxation. Studies measuring glenohumeral subluxation before and after arthroplasty should clarify its importance to the clinical outcomes of shoulder reconstruction.

Errors in Measuring Glenohumeral Arthrokinematics With 2-Dimensional Fluoroscopy.

Two-dimensional fluoroscopic imaging allows measurement of small magnitude humeral head translations that are prone to errors due to optical distortion, out-of-plane imaging, repeated manual identification of landmarks, and magnification. This article presents results from in vivo and in vitro fluoroscopy-based experiments that measure the errors and variability in estimating the humeral head translated position in true scapular plane and axillary views. The errors were expressed as bias and accuracy. The variability with repeated digitization was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement. Optical distortion caused underestimation of linear distances. The accuracy was 0.11 and 0.43mm for in vitro and in vivo experiments, respectively, for optical distortion. The intrarater reliability was excellent for both views (ICC = .94 and .93), and interrater reliability was excellent (ICC = .95) for true scapular view but moderate (ICC = .74) for axillary views. The standard error of measurement ranged from 0.27 to 0.58mm. The accuracy for the humeral head position in 10° out of true scapular plane images ranged from 0.80 to 0.87mm. The current study quantifies the magnitude of error. The results suggest that suitable measures could be incorporated to minimize errors and variability for the measurement of glenohumeral parameters.

Posterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature

Posterior shoulder dislocation is a unique finding in the orthopedics field. Although it is rarely found, this condition is one that must be considered in the presence of acute shoulder pain. Most clinicians often miss this diagnosis on initial examination; therefore, imaging radiographs are often needed to confirm the diagnosis. Unfortunately, insufficient radiographic assessment can be the greatest pitfall in establishing an accurate diagnosis. Multiple radiographic projections, including anteroposterior view, scapular Y view, and the axillary view, are important to achieve an accurate diagnosis. In this study, we present a middle-aged patient with a pain and trauma history on the shoulder. Anteroposterior radiographic examination revealed an atypical finding. Fortunately, additional radiographic projections were successful in establishing the proper diagnosis of posterior shoulder dislocation. This study also presents a comprehensive review of the keys in the recognition and treatment of the injury.

Radiographic evaluation of humeral head reconstruction with stemmed and stemless spherical implants compared with stemless elliptical head implants.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of anatomic reconstruction of three different humeral head designs after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.MethodsPostoperative radiographs of 117 patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with three different implant designs (stemmed spherical, stemless spherical, and stemless elliptical) were analyzed for landmarks that represented the prearthritic state and final implant position. We assessed the change in center of rotati7on and humeral head height on the anteroposterior view and the percentage of prosthesis overhang on the axillary lateral view. A modified anatomic reconstruction index, a compound score that rated each of the 3 parameters from 0 to 2, was created to determine the overall accuracy of the reconstruction.ResultsExcellent modified anatomic reconstruction index scores (5 or 6 points) were achieved by 68.1% of the cases in the stemless elliptical group compared with 33.3% of the cases in the stemless spherical group and by 28.3% of the cases in the stemmed spherical group (P = .001).The mean difference in restoration of humeral head height (P < .001) and percentage of prosthesis overhang (P < .001) was superior for the stemless elliptical group compared with the two other spherical head groups. There was no difference between groups for the shift in center of rotation (P = .060).ConclusionsIn this radiographic investigation comparing three different humeral head designs with respect to anatomic restoration parameters, the stemless elliptical implant more closely restored the geometry of the prearthritic humeral head as assessed by humeral head height, prosthesis overhang, and a compound reconstruction score.