Axillary Surgery Research Articles

ASO Author Reflections: De-escalating Axillary Surgery in Patients with Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

ASO Author Reflections: De-escalating Axillary Surgery in Patients with Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Axillary Surgery for Patients With Residual Isolated Tumor Cells (ypN0i+) After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Early Breast Cancer.

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Early Compliance with Commission on Cancer Operative Standards for Breast Cancer Surgery.

Efforts to define the key technical elements of breast cancer surgery, the foundation of curative treatment, have been recognized recently by the Commission on Cancer (CoC). Effective 1 January 2023, surgeon documentation in synoptic format of specific technical elements of axillary surgery for breast cancer became a CoC accreditation requirement (standards 5.3 and 5.4). After Institutional Review Board approval, the study identified patients from the authors' prospective breast surgery database granting research consent who underwent axillary surgery for breast cancer from 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2023. Operative reports, which since 2017 have been standardized templates, were reviewed for compliance. The study identified 592 eligible patients who had 623 axillary operations (76 % cN0, 24 % cN+). Full compliance with standard 5.3 was met in 71 % of cases and with standard 5.4 in 97 % of cases. Regarding standard 5.3, a mid-year internal review and subsequent individual surgeon-level communication significantly increased full synoptic documentation compliance to 98 % in quarter 4 (p < 0.001). The most common reasons for non-compliance were failure to record a response as "not applicable" regarding tracer use to identify sentinel lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant setting (the most deficient element, 81 % deficient) and failure to record "not applicable" for elements conditional on setting (upfront vs neoadjuvant surgery). Regarding standard 5.4, which has fewer elements overall, none of which are conditional, compliance was high throughout 2023. Mid-year audit and individual surgeon-level communication successfully improved compliance with standard 5.3 to meet the required threshold for accreditation. Prior practice adoption of templated operative notes likely facilitated integration of the synoptic standards into surgeon workflow.

Nodal Burden and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Residual Isolated Tumor Cells After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (ypN0i+): The OPBC-05/ICARO Study.

The nodal burden of patients with residual isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (ypN0i+) is unknown, and axillary management is not standardized. We investigated rates of additional positive lymph nodes (LNs) at axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and oncologic outcomes in patients with ypN0i+ treated with and without ALND. The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium-05/ICARO cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06464341) retrospectively analyzed data from patients with stage I to III breast cancer with ITCs in SLNs after NAC from 62 centers in 18 countries. The primary end point was the 3-year rate of any axillary recurrence. The rate of any invasive recurrence was the secondary end point. In total, 583 patients were included, of whom 182 (31%) had completion ALND and 401 (69%) did not. The median age was 48 years. Most patients (74%) were clinically node-positive at diagnosis and 41% had hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors. The mean number of SLNs with ITCs was 1.2. Patients treated with ALND were more likely to present with cN2/3 disease (17% v 7%, P < .001), have ITCs detected on frozen section (62% v 8%, P < .001), have lymphovascular invasion (38% v 24%, P < .001), and receive adjuvant chest wall (89% v 78%, P = .024) and nodal radiation (82% v 75%, P = .038). Additional positive nodes were found at ALND in 30% of patients, but only 5% had macrometastases. The 3-year rates of any axillary and any invasive recurrence were 2% (95% CI, 0.95 to 3.6) and 11% (95% CI, 8 to 14), respectively, with no statistical difference by type of axillary surgery. The nodal burden in patients with ypN0(i+) was low, and axillary recurrence after ALND omission was rare in patients selected for this approach. These results do not support routine ALND in all patients with ypN0(i+).

Identification of sentinel lymph node macrometastasis in breast cancer by deep learning based on clinicopathological characteristics

The axillary lymph node status remains an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, and nodal staging using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routine. Randomized clinical trials provide evidence supporting de-escalation of axillary surgery and omission of SLNB in patients at low risk. However, identifying sentinel lymph node macrometastases (macro-SLNMs) is crucial for planning treatment tailored to the individual patient. This study is the first to explore the capacity of deep learning (DL) models to identify macro-SLNMs based on preoperative clinicopathological characteristics. We trained and validated five multivariable models using a population-based cohort of 18,185 patients. DL models outperform logistic regression, with Transformer showing the strongest results, under the constraint that the sensitivity is no less than 90%, reflecting the sensitivity of SLNB. This highlights the feasibility of noninvasive macro-SLNM prediction using DL. Feature importance analysis revealed that patients with similar characteristics exhibited different nodal status predictions, indicating the need for additional predictors for further improvement.

Is Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Needed? Clinicopathological Correlation in a Series of 224 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Node-Positive Breast Cancers

Axillary lymph node status is valuable in determining systemic and radiation therapy. Following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with clinically involved axillary nodes, the role of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a subject of controversy. We retrospectively analyzed 224 neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated node-positive breast cancer cases and evaluated the role of ALND in optimizing staging accuracy and treatment outcomes. 63 (27.8%) underwent ALND based on post neoadjuvant persistent positive lymph nodes on exam /imaging. SLNBs were performed in 161 (71.9%) patients as initial surgical planning; 67 (41.6%) patients had positive SLNB results, and 51 (76.1%) underwent further ALND. In patients with one positive sentinel lymph node, follow-up ALND yielded additional positive lymph nodes in 10.5% of cases, whereas in patients with two or more positive sentinel lymph nodes, follow-up ALND yielded additional positive lymph nodes in 87.5% of cases. The presence of 2 positive macro-metastatic sentinel lymph nodes significantly predicts additional nodal involvement, especially in patients without a pathologic complete response. De-escalation of axillary surgery to SLNB alone in this context may be safely considered in neoadjuvant-treated clinical node positive patient with <2 positive sentinel lymph nodes. Our findings help guide surgeons to appropriately select patients who can potentially benefit from ALND for locoregional control and recommendation for adjuvant radiation.MicroabstractWe retrospectively analyzed 224 neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated node-positive breast cancer cases and found that in patients with one positive sentinel lymph node, follow-up ALND yielded additional positive lymph nodes in 10.5% of cases, whereas in patients with two or more positive sentinel lymph nodes, follow-up ALND yielded additional positive lymph nodes in 87.5% of cases. The presence of 2 positive macro-metastatic sentinel lymph nodes significantly predicts additional nodal involvement, especially in patients without a pathologic complete response. Our findings help guide surgeons to appropriately select patients who can potentially benefit from ALND.

Randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided proximal and distal approaches of intercostobrachial nerve block as an adjunct to supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper arm arteriovenous access procedures

BackgroundsUltrasound-guided proximal and distal approaches of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) blocks facilitate analgesia for upper arm and axillary surgery, though success rates vary and lack clinical comparison. This study compared...

An associate of suspicious axillary node and sentinel node in breast cancer to minimizing axillary surgery, prospective cohort study

Background: Arm morbidity and postoperative complications following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) are common problems in patients with breast cancer. The de-escalating axillary surgery is increasing; however, there is a lack of patients with suspicious nodes. This study aimed to reduce the need for SLNB in suspicious lymph node cases. Methods: A prospective cohort study of women with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022. The study included two cohorts: Cohort A comprised patients with stage cT1-2N0-1M0 cancer who planned upfront surgery, while Cohort B included patients with stages cT1-4N2M0, cT3-4N1M0, or cT1-2N0-1M0 who received neoadjuvant systemic treatment. During the study, a clip was inserted into the suspicious lymph node on imaging to determine whether it could serve as a sentinel node and potentially replace SLNB or reduce the need for axillary surgery. Result: In cohort A, twenty-two surgeries were performed, while in cohort B, seven surgeries were performed. The median follow-up time was 15 months. In cohort A, 71% of the patients had cN0 disease, while 28% had cN1 disease. A suspicious node correlated to a sentinel node was noted in 66.67% of cohort A. The false-negative rate (FNR) was 14.28%. However, when the clip node removal procedure was performed instead of the sentinel node procedure, the FNR was 10%. Conclusion: In early breast cancer, suspicious nodes in imaging studies could not currently represent sentinel lymph nodes, and the FNR was still high. Nevertheless, more studies with larger populations will provide a better understanding due to the limited number of patients.

Reimagining Deintensification for Low-Risk Breast Cancer

As outcomes for low-risk breast cancer continue to improve, research and clinical paradigms are increasingly focused on appropriate deintensification with the goal of improving the therapeutic ratio of breast cancer treatment. These deintensification approaches span across disciplines including breast surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With regard to breast surgery, studies have continued to push deintensification when it comes to surgical margins with breast conservation, reducing re-excision rates, whereas deintensification of axillary surgery has reduced the rates of axillary lymph node dissection and increasingly the need for any axillary surgery, including sentinel lymph node biopsy for low-risk patients. With regard to radiation therapy, studies have allowed for a drastic reduction in treatment duration, whereas approaches that reduce the target of treatment have led to a change from from treatment daily for 5-7 weeks to many low-risk patients completing treatment in just five treatments. With regard to systemic therapy, use of genomic assays and tumor biology has led to reduced utilization of cytotoxic chemotherapy, with studies also allowing for dose reduction of endocrine therapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Moving forward, greater focus should be placed on interdisciplinary deintensification approaches such as the consideration of radiation therapy alone as compared with endocrine therapy alone for low-risk breast cancers.

Staged Nipple Delay Procedure Expands Candidacy for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Nipple delay (ND) is a staged procedure that improves nipple-areolar complex (NAC) viability in nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) patients who are high-risk for NAC or skin-flap necrosis. This study compared postoperative outcomes and risk factors between patients treated with ND-NSM and NSM alone. Patient demographics, risk factors for NAC or skin-flap necrosis, tumor characteristics, and operative outcomes were compared between ND-NSM and NSM groups from 2009 to 2023. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant variables associated with NAC or skin-flap necrosis. Overall, 71 ND-NSM patients and 537 NSM patients were compared. ND-NSM patients had larger breasts (p<0.01), body mass index ≥ 30 (p=0.01), prior breast/chest wall radiation (XRT) [p<0.01], prior breast operations (p<0.01), less axillary surgery (p<0.01), more autologous tissue reconstruction over implant-based reconstruction compared with NSM patients (p=0.02), and more prophylaxis (p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in regard to infection, skin-flap necrosis, NAC necrosis, seromas, and hematomas. No patients in the ND-NSM group had NAC necrosis and 1 patient had skin-flap necrosis, compared with 17 and 13 patients in the NSM group, respectively (p=0.24). On univariate analysis, prior XRT was associated with increased risk for skin-flap necrosis (p=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed XRT was associated with skin-flap necrosis (p=0.02) and any necrosis (p=0.01). Breast size was associated with NAC or skin-flap necrosis (p=0.04). Larger breasts and XRT were risk factors for NAC or skin-flap necrosis; however, despite having more risk factors, ND-NSM patients had very low rates of necrosis. Notably, no nipples were lost. A shared decision should be made with patients regarding the risks and benefits of ND-NSM.

Trends in management and related outcomes for occult primary breast cancer.

Occult Primary Breast Cancer (OPBC) is a rare clinical condition in which breast cancer is located within the axillary lymph nodes, but no primary tumor is identified in the breast. We evaluated trends of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) use and subsequent axillary procedures in OPBC as well as outcomes for these patients. The National Cancer Database was used to identify adult women with cT0N1-3M0 breast cancer between 2012 to 2021 that underwent axillary lymph node surgery. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate survival between groups. 2759 patients met inclusion criteria. 86.2% underwent ALND alone in 2012, and this decreased to 65.6% in 2021. 4.7% underwent SLNB alone in 2012 and this increased to 16.2% in 2021 (p < 0.001). For patients who had undergone NAC, 46.4% of ALND patients had nodal pathologic complete response (nPCR), compared to 42.7% of SLNB + ALND and 66.4% of SLNB only patients. For patients with nPCR, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) between ALND, SLNB + ALND, and SLNB alone groups (p = 0.9912). Most OPBC patients were treated with ALND, with a modest increase towards SLNB use during the study period. There was no difference in OS with respect to axillary surgical procedure in our population for those with nPCR after NAC. This suggests that for carefully selected OPBC patients with an excellent clinical response to NAC and negative SLNB, omission of ALND may be considered.

'Balancing Challenges and Personal Resources': A Qualitative Study of Women's Experiences of Arm Impairment After Axillary Surgery for Breast Cancer.

To explore how women previously treated for breast cancer experience living with arm impairment after axillary surgery. Descriptive qualitative study. The inductive starting point for the analysis was followed by a deductive approach as the categories were related to the components of the sense of coherence framework. Twenty-eight relapse-free Swedish-speaking females participated in six focus group discussions conducted between September and December 2022. All participants had undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy with or without completion axillary dissection4 years earlier. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Three categories and an overall theme were identified. The categories 'Sense-making', 'Daily life' and 'Driving force' reflect actions to understand and prevent arm symptoms, adaptations made in daily life and the empowering resources adopted to meet challenges. The overall theme, 'Balancing challenges and personal resources', comprised a process that began at diagnosis and remained ongoing for some participants. Most participants considered their new life situations manageable. However, those with more pronounced arm impairment reported that they did not always receive adequate aid, and that their daily lives were negatively affected. Returning to everyday life after axillary surgery for breast cancer is associated with varying degrees of challenges. Individuals with persistent arm impairment find returning to normal life more challenging. Therefore, further improvements in person-centred care are of utmost importance. Members of the Swedish Breast Cancer Association were involved in the creation of the interview guide. This study emphasises the requirement for providing further individualised support to those living with more severe arm impairment after axillary surgery. This study was reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.

Regional Variation in Deescalated Therapy in Older Adults With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Although trial data support the omission of axillary surgery and radiation therapy (RT) in women aged 70 years or older with T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, potential overtreatment in older adults with frailty persists. To determine how much geospatial variation in locoregional therapy may be attributed to region vs patient factors. This retrospective cross-sectional study included women aged 70 years or older who were diagnosed with HR+/ERBB2-negative (ERBB2-) breast cancer from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017. Data came from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare. Hierarchical multivariable modeling was used to evaluate the variance in deescalated care attributable to 4 domains, ie, (1) random, (2) region (health service area [HSA]), (3) patient factors, and (4) unexplained. Patient factors included age, frailty (validated claims-based measure), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and socioeconomic status (Yost index). Analyses were performed from January to October 2023. HSA. Deescalated care, defined as omission of axillary surgery, RT, or both. Standard therapy was defined as lumpectomy, axillary surgery, and RT or mastectomy with axillary surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with deescalated care receipt. Of 9173 patients (mean [SD] age, 76.5 [5.2] years), 2363 (25.8%) were aged 80 years or older, 705 (7.7%) had frailty, and 419 (4.6%) had a CCI of 2 or greater. While 4499 (49.1%) underwent standard therapy, 4674 (50.9%) underwent deescalated therapy (1193 [13.0%] of the population omitted axillary surgery and 4342 [55.5%] of patients undergoing lumpectomy omitted RT). Of the total variance, random variation explained 27.3%, region/HSA explained 35.3%, patient factors explained 2.8%, and 34.5% was unexplained. In adjusted models, frailty and increased age were associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing deescalated therapy (frailty: odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.43-2.02; age, by 1-year increment: OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11), but CCI was not. Patients in rural areas compared with those in urban areas (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.99) and Asian and Pacific Islander patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.85) had a lower likelihood of undergoing deescalated therapy. In this retrospective cross-sectional study of women aged 70 years or older diagnosed with T1N0 HR+/ERBB2- breast cancer, region/HSA contributed more to the variation in deescalated therapy use than patient factors. Unexplained variation may be attributed to unmeasured characteristics, such as multidisciplinary environment and patient preference. Decision support efforts to address overtreatment should target regions with low rates of evidence-based deescalation.

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation for Early-Stage Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

Purpose: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) represents 10-15% of invasive breast cancers with limited representation among trials of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Contemporary guidelines advise against treating ILC with APBI given a paucity of supportive evidence. Here, we evaluated oncologic outcomes among patients with ILC treated with APBI. Methods: Patients treated from 2010 –2022 with APBI following breast conserving surgery for ILC (or mixed ILC with other histologies) were ascertained from a prospectively-maintained institutional database. All patients received external beam APBI to 40Gy in 10 daily fractions. Outcomes of interest included local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 1248 patients who underwent APBI at our center, the study cohort comprised 132 (11%) who had ILC, either exclusively or mixed with another histology (median age 63). Median tumor size was 1.1cm (IQR: 0.8, 1.5), nearly all had estrogen receptor positive disease (99%) and received endocrine therapy (91%), and most underwent sentinel node biopsy (89%) with the remainder having no axillary surgery. At 530 person-years and a median follow-up of 39 months, two LRs were observed yielding a 48-month cumulative incidence of LR of 3.0% (95% CI 0.56 –9.5%). Both events arose in patients with mixed lobular histology (none arose in patients with pure ILC). Two unrelated deaths were also observed yielding a 48-month overall survival of 98% (95% CI: 95% - 100%) Conclusion: Among patients with ILC who received APBI following BCS, we observed a 4-year LR rate of 3%. No regional or distant recurrences were observed, and overall survival was excellent. The safety of APBI for ILC will require confirmation among larger trials with longer follow-up, although the excellent outcomes observed here are consistent with those seen for invasive ductal carcinomas among contemporary trials of APBI.

Comprehensive Axillary Management of Clinically Node-Positive (cN+) Breast Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

In breast cancer (BC) patients, axillary management has undergone major improvements over the last few years, and efforts to identify the optimal strategy for the management of axillary surgery are still ongoing. In current clinical practice, women with clinically node-positive (cN+) BC usually receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with the aim of reducing the extent of primary disease and, thus, allowing for axillary-conservative surgery. Remarkably, after NACT, up to one out of three patients achieves an axillary pathologic complete response, which, in turn, is associated with a more favorable prognosis than residual axillary disease. However, NACT is not without drawbacks, as NACT-associated inflammation can damage lymphatic vessels. Furthermore, varying degrees of response may occur in the axillary lymph nodes, increasing the false negative rate for sentinel biopsy. At present, there is no consensus on the optimal approach in patients with cN+ BC undergoing NACT, although multidisciplinary management seems to be recommended. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of axillary management in cN+ BC patients undergoing NACT. It uses a multidisciplinary approach that encompasses the oncological management perspectives, as well as surgical and chemotherapeutic viewpoints.

Applying the SOUND Trial for Omitting Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in Bahrain.

The Sentinel Node vs. Observation After Axillary Ultra-Sound (SOUND) trial reported that omission of axillary surgery was not inferior to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in those with cT1 breast cancer and negative preoperative axillary ultrasound. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of early breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) at our institution in order to investigate the exportability of SOUND criteria to our patient population. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cT1N0 breast cancer undergoing BCS and adjuvant radiotherapy according to the SOUND trial criteria. Comparison was made between the eligible group of our cohort and the SLNB arm of the SOUND trial. The proportion of younger patients was higher in our eligible cohort (37.7% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.002). Postmenopausal patients were more prevalent in the SOUND trial (79.4% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.004). On final pathology, tumours were more likely to be upgraded to T2 in our group (26.4% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.001). Patients in our cohort were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (37.7% vs. 20.1%, p = 0.002). The clinicopathological differences between our cohort and the SOUND trial population could be attributed to aggressive tumours in Bahrain compared to Western countries. Our study may influence others to investigate the applicability of the SOUND trial in clinical practice. Nevertheless, it is a study that should generate multidisciplinary discussion in the de-escalation of axillary surgery.

Magnetic lymphatic tracing for omission of sentinel lymph node biopsies in mastectomy patients: a community cancer center experience.

Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and patients undergoing risk reduction mastectomy may undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at the time of mastectomy to complete axillary staging were an underlying invasive malignancy to be found on final pathology. Among patients with DCIS undergoing mastectomy, 15-29% of patients will have invasive disease on final pathology; therefore, approximately 70-85% of patients may benefit from avoiding SLNB. Superparamagnetic tracers (SPMT) have been proven to be non-inferior to the standard radioisotope and blue dye combination. SPMT remains active for several weeks, allowing a large proportion of DCIS and genetic carrier patients to potentially avoid SLNB in the setting of mastectomy. We hypothesize the use of SPMT will reduce the number of SLNB performed in patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS and risk reduction, ultimately reducing the number of complications associated with axillary surgery. We seek to report our community cancer center's experience with SPMT and omission of SLNB in the DCIS and prophylactic mastectomy patient population. We performed a retrospective review of 52 female patients with DCIS or known genetic predisposition undergoing mastectomy. SPMT (Magtrace®, Endomag Ltd, Cambridge, UK) was injected ipsilateral to DCIS and bilaterally for prophylactic mastectomy patients. Our primary outcome was rate of return to the operating room (OR) for delayed SLNB. Secondary outcomes included post-operative complications within 30days of surgery and operative time. We compared outcomes to a control group of 28 women undergoing mastectomy for DCIS or for risk reduction who underwent SLNB at their index operation in traditional fashion. Continuous variables were reported using median and interquartile ranges (IQR) and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data were reported using frequency and percent and were compared using Pearson's Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact test, as appropriate. Alpha was set to 0.05 to determine statistical significance. There was a total of 80 patients (52 SPMT, 28 control). Median age of SPMT patients was 49.5 (IQR 40-60.75) vs. 54.5 (48 - 65) in the traditional tracer group. vs. control group. 57.7% of SPMT patients underwent mastectomy for DCIS vs. 89.3% in the control group. Eight SPMT patients (15.4%) had invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) on final pathology and seven of those patients underwent delayed SLNB (87.5%). None of the delayed SLNB were positive for metastatic disease. Rates of post-operative complications were similar between the two groups, including hematoma, seroma, and surgical site infection. OR times were also similar with median OR time 202min (min) for the SPMT group vs. 195min for the control group. Use of SPMT avoided SLNB in 84.6% of our patients. We found no difference in rates of post-operative complications or operative times in patients using SPMT for omission of SLNB at time of mastectomy compared to the control group. Our findings suggest SLNB can be avoided in a majority of patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS or risk reduction in the setting of genetic predisposition.

Utility of a breast biopsy clip and a point marker system in tailored axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Tailored axillary surgery (TAS) is a new approach for selective removal of metastatic lymph nodes. This study evaluated the safety and utility of TAS using a breast biopsy clip inserted into a metastatic lymph node and a point marker consisting of a short hook wire and nylon thread to remove the clipped lymph node. Patients with breast cancer and clinically confirmed metastases to one-to-three axillary lymph nodes were included in this study. A breast biopsy clip was inserted into the metastatic lymph nodes before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. TAS was performed in patients with ycN0 disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The lymph nodes containing the clips were removed using a point marker. The success criteria for TAS were the removal of the lymph node into which the clip was inserted using a point marker and the identification of the sentinel lymph node. The false-negative rate was calculated for cases in which TAS and axillary lymph node dissection were performed. Thirty individuals from two institutions were enrolled between May 2021 and November 2022, of whom 20 underwent TAS. Ten patients had clinically positive axillary lymph nodes and underwent axillary lymph node dissection. No adverse events were observed in any patient using the clips or point markers. TAS was successful in 18 of the 20 patients (90%). Seven patients underwent TAS and axillary lymph node dissection with a false-negative rate of 0%. The use of clips and point markers to perform TAS is clinically feasible.

Financial toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving regional nodal irradiation: Variation by cancer subtype

BackgroundWe evaluated sociodemographic and clinical predictors of financial toxicity (FT) among patients with breast cancer with higher risk clinical factors warranting regional nodal irradiation (RNI). MethodsAmong 183 participants in a clinical trial of conventional vs. hypofractionated treatment with RNI, 125 (68 %) completed a pilot survey of FT measured using the validated Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) instrument, scored from 0 (minimal) to 10 (severe) FT. Associations with predictors were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients and Kruskal Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests. Predictors of severe FT (ENRICh≥5) were tested using multivariable logistic regression with odds ratios converted to relative risks (RR). ResultsOf the sample, all received RNI, 92 % chemotherapy, 67 % axillary dissection, 26 % mastectomy without reconstruction, and 32 % mastectomy with reconstruction. At a median follow up of 1.48 years, median FT score was 2.13 (IQR 0.93–4.6), with 20.8 % of patients experiencing severe FT. Unadjusted worse FT score was associated with younger age (P = 0.003), Hispanic ethnicity (P = 0.006), lower income (P = 0.02), shorter interval from diagnosis to FT assessment (P = 0.02), and chemotherapy receipt (P = 0.05), but not with breast surgery type (P = 0.42), axillary surgery type (P = 0.33), or pathologic T (P = 0.68) or N stage (P = 0.47). In multivariable analysis, triple negative subtype was the sole clinical factor predicting severe FT (RR = 3.38; 95 % CI 1.48–4.99; P = 0.01). ConclusionAmong patients with breast cancer receiving RNI, triple negative subtype was associated with severe FT, suggesting that tumor receptor subtype may help identify a key breast cancer subpopulation for early FT intervention.

Oncological outcomes in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy.

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic implications of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We analyzed 152 patients with residual TNBC who underwent breast-conserving surgery after NAC between December 2008 and December 2017. Most patients (n = 133; 87.5%) received taxane-based chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was administered at a total dose of 45-65 Gy in 15-30 fractions to the whole breast, with some patients also receiving RT to regional nodes. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors influencing survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional-hazards model. During a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 9 to 179 months), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 68.0%. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were 83.6%, 72.6%, and 78.7%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the cN stage, ypT stage, ypN stage, axillary operation type, and RT field were associated with DFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher ypT stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-3.82; p = 0.049) and ypN stage (HR = 4.7; 95% CI 1.57-14.24; p = 0.006) were associated with inferior DFS. Among clinically node-positive patients, those who received RT to the breast only had a 5-year DFS of 73.7%, whereas those who received RNI achieved a DFS of 59.6% (p = 0.164). There were no differences between the DFS and RNI. In patients with residual TNBC, higher ypT and ypN stages were associated with poorer outcomes after NAC. RNI did not appear to improve DFS. More intensive treatments incorporating systemic therapy and RT should be considered for these patients.