Axillary Artery Cannulation Research Articles

Comparison of the effects of femoral and axillary artery cannulation on ischemic cerebral injury in acute type A aortic dissection surgery: A retrospective study

Background: Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring emergency surgical intervention. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of femoral and axillary arterial cannulation techniques on ischemic neurological damage and mortality.Materials and Method: A total of 60 patients who underwent emergency surgery for ATAAD between 2016 and 2021 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the arterial cannulation technique: Group A (axillary cannulation) and Group F (femoral cannulation). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was incidence of ischemic cerebral injury and secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and postoperative complications.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of ischemic cerebral injury (p=0.13). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups (p= 0.27). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the cannulation type was a risk factor for ischemic cerebral injury development (OR [95% CI]; 119.034 [1.612–8791.314], p=0.029).Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the type of cannulation may be a risk factor for the development of ischemic cerebral injury. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal arterial cannulation technique for improving outcomes in ATAAD surgery.

Carotid versus axillary artery cannulation for descending aorta remodeling in type A acute aortic dissection.

Arterial cannulation sites for the surgical repair of type A aortic dissection (AAD) have evolved from right axillary artery (AA) cannulation to bilateral carotid artery (CA) based of femoral artery (FA) cannulation. Postoperative descending aorta remodeling is closely linked to the false lumen area ratio (FLAR), defined as false lumen area/aortic area, as well as to the incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT). To investigate the effect of the updated arterial cannulation strategy on descending aortic remodeling. A total of 443 AAD patients who received FA combined cannulation between March 2015 and March 2023 were included in the study. Of these, 209 received right AA cannulation and 234 received bilateral CA cannulation. The primary outcome was the change in FLAR, as calculated from computed tomography angiography in three segments of the descending aorta: Thoracic (S1), upper abdominal (S2), and lower abdominal (S3). Secondary outcomes were the incidence of RRT and the serum inflammation response, as observed by the levels of high sensitivity C reaction protein (hs-CRP) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6). The postoperative/preoperative ratio of FLAR in S2 and S3 was higher in the AA group compared to the CA group (S2: 0.80 ± 0.08 vs 0.75 ± 0.07, P < 0.001; S3: 0.57 ± 0.12 vs 0.50 ± 0.12, P < 0.001, respectively). The AA group also had a significantly higher incidence of RRT (19.1% vs 8.5%, P = 0.001; odds ratio: 2.533, 95%CI: 1.427-4.493) and higher levels of inflammation cytokines 24 h after the procedure [hr-CRP: 117 ± 17 vs 104 ± 15 mg/L; IL-6: 129 (103, 166) vs 83 (69, 101) pg/mL; both P < 0.001] compared to the CA group. The CA cannulation strategy was associated with better abdominal aorta remodeling after AAD repair compared to AA cannulation, as observed by a greater change in FLAR and lower incidence of RRT.

A comparative study of femoral artery and combined femoral and axillary artery cannulation in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a critical support technique for cardiac surgery patients. This study compares the outcomes of femoral artery cannulation vs. combined femoral and axillary artery cannulation in post-cardiotomy VA-ECMO patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients post-cardiac surgery under VA-ECMO support using different cannulation strategies. Specifically, the focus was on the impact of femoral artery (FA) cannulation vs. combined femoral artery and axillary artery (FA+AA) cannulation on patient outcomes. Through a retrospective analysis, we compared 51 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery and received VA-ECMO support based on the cannulation strategy employed-FA cannulation in 27 cases vs. FA+AA cannulation in 24 cases. The FA+AA group showed significant advantages over the FA group in terms of the incidence of chronic renal failure (CRF) (37.50% vs. 14.81%, p = 0.045), preoperative blood filtration requirement (37.50% vs. 11.11%, p = 0.016), decreased platelet count (82.67 ± 44.95 vs. 147.33 ± 108.79, p = 0.014), and elevated creatinine (Cr) levels (151.80 ± 60.73 vs. 110.26 ± 57.99, p = 0.041), although the two groups had similar 30-day mortality rates (FA group 40.74%, FA+AA group 33.33%). These findings underscore that a combined approach may offer more effective hemodynamic support and better clinical outcomes when selecting an ECMO cannulation strategy. Despite the FA+AA group patients presenting with more preoperative risk factors, this group has exhibited lower rates of complications and faster recovery during ECMO treatment. While there has been no significant difference in 30-day mortality rates between the two cannulation strategies, the FA+AA approach may be more effective in reducing complications and improving limb ischemia. These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies and meticulous monitoring in managing post-cardiac surgery ECMO patients.

Aortic versus axillary artery cannulation for hemiarch replacement: single-centre real-world experience

BackgroundAortic arch disease is a major cause of acute dissections. Surgical replacement is the current curative treatment for aortic arch disease. While traditional aortic cannulation ensures lower body perfusion, axillary cannulation offers optimum cerebral perfusion.AimTo evaluate the outcomes of aortic and axillary cannulation methods in hemiarch replacements, focusing on postoperative perfusion and survival.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 91 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement surgery between February 2007 and October 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on the cannulation method: aortic cannulation (54 patients) and axillary cannulation (37 patients). Data regarding preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed, including demographics, surgical outcomes, and complications.ResultsDemographic analysis showed comparable characteristics between the two groups, with notable differences in aortic disease severity and classification. Patients in the axillary group had a larger ascending aorta diameter (57.7 ± 10.8 mm vs. 51.8 ± 5.7 mm, p = 0.002) and a higher prevalence of acute dissections (27.0% (n = 10) vs. 3.7% (n = 2), p = 0.001). Cerebral protection methods varied significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001). Antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 37.8% (n = 14) of the axillary group compared to 3.7% (n = 2) of the central group. The central cannulation group had a higher proportion of patients with temperatures under 20 °C (98.1% (n = 53) vs. 21.6% (n = 8), p < 0.001), whereas the axillary group maintained higher temperatures (24 –28 °C) in 68.6% (n = 23) of cases. AV repair/replacement was more frequent in the aortic cannulation group (48.2% (n = 26) vs. 18.9% (n = 7), p = 0.013). No significant disparities were observed in operative mortality or intraoperative complications. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups in the in-hospital outcomes, but renal complications were more prevalent in the axillary cannulation group with 21.6% (n = 8) experiencing acute kidney injury compared to 9.3% (n = 5) in the central group (p = 0.098). The overall survival rate was slightly higher in the aortic cannulation group at various follow-up periods, yet no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups.ConclusionWe found no significant differences in safety and efficacy between axillary cannulation and aortic cannulation in hemiarch replacement procedures.

Perioperative risks associated with administration of andexanet alfa during emergency cardiac surgery with circulatory arrest.

This case report describes the perioperative course of a patient undergoing emergency repair of acute type A thoracic aortic dissection. Andexanet alfa was administered intraoperatively to obtain a dry operative field for right axillary artery exposure and cannulation. Andexanet alfa-induced heparin resistance resulted in cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and pericardial thrombosis requiring more than 400,000 units of unfractionated heparin and antithrombin III to overcome. Postoperatively, excessive chest tube output was observed secondary to protracted heparin rebound requiring continuous dosing of protamine. This case demonstrates the significant challenging perioperative, not just intraoperative, hazards associated with intraoperative andexanet alfa use during emergency cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Femoro-axillary versus femoro-femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock: A monocentric retrospective study.

For veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the femoral artery is the preferred cannulation site (femoro-femoral: Vf-Af). This results in retrograde aortic flow, which increases the left ventricular afterload and can lead to severe pulmonary edema and thrombosis of the cardiac chambers. Right axillary artery cannulation (femoral-axillary: Vf-Aa) provides partial anterograde aortic flow, which may prevent some complications. This study aimed to compare the 90-day mortality and complication rates between VF-AA and VF-AF. Consecutive adult patients with cardiogenic shock who received peripheral VA-ECMO between 2013 and 2019 at our institution were retrospectively included. The exclusion criteria were refractory cardiac arrest, multiple VA-ECMO implantations due to vascular access changes, weaning failure, or ICU readmission. A statistical approach using inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate the effect of the cannulation site on the outcomes. The primary endpoint was the 90-day mortality. The secondary endpoints were vascular access complications, stroke, and other complications related to retrograde blood flow. Outcomes were estimated using logistic regression analysis. VA-ECMO was performed on 534 patients. Patients with refractory cardiac arrest (n = 77 (14%)) and those supported by multiple VA-ECMO (n = 92, (17%)) were excluded. Out of the 333 patients studied (n = 209 Vf-Aa; n = 124 VF-AF), the main indications for VA-ECMO implantation were post-cardiotomy (33%, n = 109), dilated cardiomyopathy (20%, n = 66), post-cardiac transplantation (15%, n = 50), acute myocardial infarction (14%, n = 46) and other etiologies (18%, n = 62). The median SOFA score was 9 [7-11], and the crude 90-day mortality rate was 53% (n = 175). After IPTW, the 90-day mortality was similar in the Vf-Aa and VF-AF groups (54% vs 58%, IPTW-OR = 0.84 [0.54-1.29]). Axillary artery cannulation was associated with significantly fewer local infections (OR = 0.21, 95% CI:0.09-0.51), limb ischemia (OR = 0.37, 95% CI:0.17-0.84), bowel ischemia (OR = 0.16, 95% CI:0.05-0.51) and pulmonary edema (OR = 0.52, 95% CI:0.29-0.92) episodes, but with a higher rate of stroke (OR = 2.87, 95% CI:1.08-7.62) than femoral artery cannulation. Compared to VF-AF, axillary cannulation was associated with similar 90-day mortality rates. The high rate of stroke associated with axillary artery cannulation requires further investigation.

Central (Aortic) Cannulation versus Peripheral (Axillary or Femoral) Cannulation in Acute Type A Aortic Dissections: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

There has been an increased interest in using antegrade cannulation techniques during surgery for type A aortic dissection. While the utilization of central artery cannulation has been on the rise in recent times, its effectiveness and safety still require thorough examination. This study aimed to explore both the efficiency and safety of central arterial cannulation. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies that evaluated surgical outcomes when using central artery cannulation (CAC) in comparison to axillary artery cannulation (AXC) or femoral artery cannulation (FAC). 10 retrospective observational studies were included, enrolling 3022 patients (CAC = 1208 vs. FAC = 606; CAC = 1051 vs. AXC = 1119). Among these, 4 articles involved axillary artery cannulation, femoral artery cannulation, and central artery cannulation. Central cannulation was linked to decreased short-term mortality [odds ratio, 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.48, 0.89), 2 = 3.27, p = 0.007; = 0; p = 0.86] compared to femoral cannulation. Additionally, central cannulation was associated with a lower occurrence of temporary neurological dysfunction (TND) [odds ratio, 0.57, 95% CI (0.38, 0.85), 2 = 0.88, p = 0.006; = 0%, p = 0.83] when compared with femoral cannulation. However, there was no statistical significance in mortality and TND between the central cannulation and axillary cannulation groups. This meta-analysis reveals that central cannulation surpasses femoral cannulation in lowering short-term mortality and the occurrence of TND among patients undergoing surgery for type A acute aortic dissection. However, central cannulation does not exhibit a higher mortality and TND compared to axillary cannulation.

Is axillary artery cannulation necessary in type II hybrid aortic arch repair for acute type A aortic dissection?

Axillary artery cannulation (AAC) has been widely employed in total arch replacement surgeries using the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), showing better clinical results than femoral artery cannulation (FAC). Nevertheless, in type II hybrid arch repair (HAR), FAC is crucial for lower body perfusion. Hence, it is unclear whether AAC remains necessary or if AAC represents a more advantageous method for initiating cardiopulmonary bypass. We conducted a study involving patients diagnosed with ATAAD who underwent type II HAR from August 2021 to December 2022. Demographic baseline and intraoperative data were collected, and the postoperative outcomes of patients receiving FAC only were compared with those receiving AAC. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between patients who underwent FAC alone (n = 46) and those who underwent AAC (n = 39). Patients who underwent AAC showed a lower incidence of transient neurological dysfunction (TND) post-surgery compared to those who underwent FAC (12.8% vs 32.6%, p = .032). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative mortality within 30days, permanent neurological dysfunction (PND), length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and postoperative ward, duration of mechanical ventilation, and other complications. Axillary artery cannulation may decrease the incidence of postoperative transient neurological dysfunction (TND) in type II HAR for ATAAD. Nonetheless, studies with larger sample sizes are necessary.

Direct aortic cannulation, a safe alternative to femoral artery cannulation - 17 years of type A dissection surgery experience

Aim: Optimal cannulation strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgery remains debated. Recent guidelines have advocated antegrade systemic perfusion through right axillary artery (RAX) cannulation, instead of femoral artery (FA) cannulation. However, RAX cannulation can be technically challenging and time-consuming. On the other hand, direct (ascending) aorta (DA) cannulation is a swift procedure that also ensures downstream antegrade flow. In this regard, we assessed whether DA cannulation is a safe alternative to FA cannulation. Methods: Records of all patients undergoing ATAAD surgery between 2006-2022 at the Radboud University Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In total, 281 patients underwent surgery for ATAAD during the investigated period. Three patients were excluded due to death before the start of extracorporeal circulation and four because of RAX cannulation. Of the remaining 274 patients, 53% (N = 145) received primary FA and 47% (N = 129) DA cannulation, with a success rate of 98% for both approaches. Surgical mortality (combined in-hospital and 30-day) was 9.9% (7.8% DA group vs. 11.7% FA group, P = 0.271). New permanent neurological damage was seen in 10.9% vs. 6.9% (P = 0.248), respectively. In multivariate analysis, cannulation strategies were not significantly associated with surgical mortality nor postoperative new permanent neurological damage. Conclusion: DA cannulation offers a safe and fast alternative to FA cannulation in ATAAD surgery. There were no significant differences in mortality and neurological complications. Future studies should focus on the differences between RAX and DA cannulation strategies on postoperative outcomes in ATAAD surgery.

Axillary vs Femoral Arterial Cannulation in Acute Type A Dissection: International Multicenter Data

BackgroundCannulation strategy in acute type A dissection (ATAD) varies widely without known gold standards. This study compared ATAD outcomes of axillary vs femoral artery cannulation in a large cohort from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). MethodsThe study retrospectively reviewed 2145 patients from the IRAD Interventional Cohort (1996-2021) who underwent ATAD repair with axillary or femoral cannulation (axillary group: n = 1106 [52%]; femoral group: n = 1039 [48%]). End points included the following: early mortality; neurologic, respiratory, and renal complications; malperfusion; and tamponade. All outcomes are presented as axillary with respect to femoral. ResultsThe proportion of patients younger than 70 years in both groups was similar (n = 1577 [74%]), as were bicuspid aortic valve, Marfan syndrome, and previous dissection. Patients with femoral cannulation had slightly more aortic insufficiency (408 [55%] vs 429 [60%]; P = .058) and coronary involvement (48 [8%] vs 70 [13%]; P = .022]. Patients with axillary cannulation underwent more total aortic arch (156 [15%] vs 106 [11%]; P = .02) and valve-sparing root replacements (220 [22%] vs 112 [12%]; P < .001). More patients with femoral cannulation underwent commissural resuspension (269 [30.9%] vs 324 [35.3%]; P = .05). Valve replacement rates were not different. The mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in the femoral group (190 [149-237] minutes vs 196 [159-247] minutes; P = .037). In-hospital mortality was similar between the axillary (n = 165 [15%]) and femoral (n = 149 [14%]) groups (P = .7). Furthermore, there were no differences in stroke, visceral ischemia, tamponade, respiratory insufficiency, coma, or spinal cord ischemia. ConclusionsAxillary cannulation is associated with a more stable ATAD presentation, but it is a more extensive intervention compared with femoral cannulation. Both procedures have equivalent early mortality, stroke, tamponade, and malperfusion outcomes after statistical adjustment.

Direct Right Axillary Artery Cannulation as First Choice Strategy during Aortic Surgery Procedures: Results from a Single Experienced Surgical Centre

Objectives: Since early nineties axillary artery has been proposed as alternative to femoral artery for peripheral arterial cannulation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in aortic surgery. The aim of this study is to report our single-centre experience using direct axillary artery cannulation during aortic surgery. Methods: One hundred consecutive patients, undergoing aortic surgery using direct axillary artery cannulation were enrolled. Patient population ranged between 29 to 87 years and mean age was 65 ± 13 years. Seventy-seven patients (77%) underwent scheduled complex surgical procedure and 23 patients (23%) underwent emergent surgical procedure. Sixteen patients, furthermore, have had a previous cardiac surgery procedure. Results: CPB management using direct axillary artery cannulation was satisfactory in all cases. No case of malperfusion (cerebral and/or visceral) was reported. Out of 100 patients undergoing direct cannulation of axillary artery, no major complications related to the site or the technique of the cannulation were recorded. Local minor complications were reported in 6 patients (6%). In all 6 patients such complications were transitory and there was no residual compromission at the discharge. Overall 30-days mortality was 16%. Twenty-two patients (22%) conversely were discharged directly from intensive care unit (ICU) to chronic rehabilitation center. Sixty-seven patients (67%) were successfully discharged home. Conclusions: Our experience clearly shows that direct axillary artery cannulation is a safe, effective and reproducible technique for arterial cannulation during complex surgical procedures involving thoracic aorta. We do support such approach as a first choice strategy in such circumstances.

Right Axillary Artery Cannulation for Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Postcardiotomy Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: To analyze the patient outcome and complication rate of axillary artery cannulation for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients who could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass after cardiothoracic surgery. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the data of 179 patients who were supported with VA-ECMO with femoral-axillary access (FA VA-ECMO) after cardiothoracic surgery between January 2014 and January 2019 in our department. Patients requiring central aortic cannulation and patients with respiratory failure requiring veno-venous ECMO were excluded. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival rate of patients who were weaned from VA-ECMO support. Secondary outcomes were cannulation-related complications at the axillary site, VA-ECMO-related complications, and systemic complications. Results: In our cohort, 60 (33.5%) patients were female. Mean age was 67.0 ± 10.9 years. Overall, 78 (43.5%) patients were operated upon electively, 37 (20.7%) patients underwent urgent surgery, and 64 (35.8%) patients underwent emergency surgical treatment. Sixty-seven patients (37.4%) were resuscitated preoperatively. The mean duration of VA-ECMO support was 8.4 ± 5.1 days. Weaning from VA-ECMO was successful in 87 (48.6%) patients; 62 (34.6%) patients survived the hospital stay. The 1-year survival rate was 74%. Subclavian bleeding occurred in 24 (13.4%) patients, femoral bleeding in 4 (2.2%) patients, ischemia of the upper limb in 11 (6.1%) patients, intracerebral bleeding in 9 (5%) patients, and stroke in 19 (10.6%) patients. Conclusions: In patients with acute LV dysfunction after cardiothoracic surgery who cannot be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, right axillary artery cannulation is a safe and reliable method for VA-ECMO support with an acceptable complication rate.

Total aortic arch replacement without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in type A aortic dissection: Left axillar artery for arterial cannulation

ObjectiveTotal aortic arch replacement (TAR) necessitates hypothermic circulatory arrest (CA). The frozen elephant trunk technique (FET) additionally requires commercial hybrid grafts. Herein we describe a novel modified FET technique without CA using standard grafts thanks to left axillary artery (LAxA) cannulation in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. MethodsLAxA anastomosis is made first using a homemade debranching graft, and cardiopulmonary bypass is initiated, followed by anastomoses of left common carotid and innominate arteries. The rest of the operation is performed with complete cerebral perfusion. Following replacement of ascending aorta/root, cardiac reperfusion is started using a root cannula which continues throughout the procedure. Distal arch anastomosis is performed clamp-on, allowing lower body perfusion via left subclavian artery. Lower body perfusion is interrupted for 5 to 8 minutes to deploy an endograft to complete a modified FET. Following cannulation of distal arch graft, perfusion of distal aorta is restarted, and all three grafts are incorporated to construct a neo-ascending aorta and arch. ResultsBetween December 2018 and May 2022, 38 patients underwent TAR without operative mortality. Hospital mortality was %15.7, and spinal cord ischemia and stroke were not encountered in surviving patients. The mean lower body CA time was 7.2 ± 2.8 minutes. ConclusionsTAR using standard endografts without CA is possible with LAxA cannulation. To perform a FET, only a short interruption of lower body circulation is sufficient to deploy an endograft, also improving hemostasis of distal anastomosis. Further studies are required with a higher number of patients to evaluate the efficiency of this novel technique.

Influence of a regional network combined with a systematic multidisciplinary approach on the outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection

BackgroundWhether in patients with acute type A aortic dissection reduction of intervals between onset of symptoms and diagnosis influences patient outcomes is still not completely defined. MethodsIn 199 patients with acute type A aortic dissection, the efficacy of a systematic multidisciplinary approach and institution of a regional network were evaluated; 90 patients operated before 2016 (Group1) were compared with 109 repaired after 2016 (Group2) for early and late outcomes. ResultsMortality was reduced from 13% in Group1 to 4% in Group2 (p = 0.013). In Group2 a more patients (46%) had arch replacement compared to Group1 (29%)(p = 0.06). In Group2 axillary artery cannulation was almost routinely used (91% vs 67%, p < 0.001) with shorter circulatory arrest time (37 vs 44 min, p < 0.001). The interval from diagnosis to surgery dropped from 210 min in Group1 to 160 min in Group2 (p < 0.001); this reduction was evident both in patients admitted to the emergency department of a spoke and/or a hub center. Patients presenting with or developing shock were reduced from Group1 to Group2 and in particular those reaching the hub center from spoke centers. Survival at 1 and 5 years was 82 ± 4% and 70 ± 5% in Group1 vs 92 ± 3% and 87 ± 8% in Group2 (p = 0.007). ConclusionsOutcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection improved using a systematic multidisciplinary approach while a network between spoke and hub centers reduced intervals between diagnosis, transportation to hub center and repair, limiting the incidence of tamponade and shock.

Left ventricular assist device implantation combined with hemiarch replacement for severe aortic atherosclerosis.

Implantation of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has emerged as a widely employed therapeutic approach for specifically chosen individuals suffering from severe heart failure. Stroke is a well-known complication of LVAD implantation. Concomitant aortic surgeries in patients requiring LVAD implantation to avoid outflow graft anastomosis to a severe atherosclerotic aorta are unknown. We illustrate a successful LVAD implantation with hemiarch replacement for severe aortic atherosclerosis to decrease the risk of postoperative stroke. A 72-year-old male patient with advanced heart failure has chosen to undergo LVAD treatment. Preoperative examinations detected severe atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta. It was determined that clamping the ascending aorta and directly connecting the outflow graft could increase the risk of stroke after surgery. Therefore, it was decided to replace the diseased ascending aorta entirely. The HeartMate 3 was implanted under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using right axillary artery cannulation. And moderate hypothermia and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion were utilized to perform hemiarch replacement. Subsequently, the outflow graft was connected to an artificial ascending aortic graft. The patient did not exhibit any specific complications, such as neurological abnormalities, after the surgery. Based on our observations, it appears that LVAD implantation combined with aortic replacement could be a viable option for specific patients, particularly those who have a perioperative stroke risk due to aortic atherosclerosis.

Analysis of risk factors for postoperative mortality in acute type A aortic dissection patients under different critical levels

We built up a risk stratification model to divide acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) patients into low- and high-risk groups, further, to evaluate the risk factors for postoperative mortality. A total of 1364 patients from 2010 to 2020 in our center were retrospectively analyzed. More than twenty clinical variables were related with postoperative mortality. The postoperative mortality of the high-risk patients was doubled than the low-risk ones (21.8% vs 10.1%). The increased operation time, combined coronary artery bypass graft, cerebral complications, re-intubation, continuous renal replacement therapy and surgical infection were risk factors of postoperative mortality in low-risk patients. In addition, postoperative lower limbs or visceral malperfusion were risk factors, axillary artery cannulation and moderate hypothermia were protective factors in high-risk patients. A scoring system for quick decision-making is needed to select appropriate surgical strategy in aTAAD patients. For low-risk patients, different surgical treatments can be performed with similar clinical prognosis. Limited arch treatment and appropriate cannulation approach are crucial in high-risk aTAAD patients.

The relationship between false-lumen area ratio and renal replacement therapy after acute aortic dissection repair on bilateral artery cannulation: a cross-sectional study.

Malperfusion poses a serious challenge to organ function in the repair of acute aortic dissection (AAD). The purpose of this study was to explore the segment change of false-lumen area ratio (FLAR; the ratio of the maximal false-lumen area to the total lumen area) in the descending aorta and its relationship with renal replacement therapy (RRT) after total aortic arch (TAA) surgery. A total of 228 patients with AAD who received TAA using perfusion mode right axillary and femur artery cannulation between March 2013 and March 2022 were included in a cross-sectional study. The descending aorta was divided into 3 segments: the descending thoracic aorta (S1), the abdominal aorta above the ostium of the renal artery (S2), and the abdominal aorta between the ostium of the renal artery and the iliac bifurcation (S3). The primary outcomes were postoperative segmental FLAR changes in the descending aorta, which were observed using computed tomography angiography before the patients were discharged from the hospital. The secondary outcomes were RRT and 30-day mortality. The total potencies in the false lumen were 71.1%, 95.2%, and 88.2% in S1, S2, and S3. The postoperative/preoperative ratio of the FLAR was higher in S2 than that in S1 and S3 (S1: 67%±14%; S2: 80%±8%; S3: 57%±12%; all P values <0.001). For the patients undergoing RRT, there was a higher postoperative/preoperative ratio of the FLAR for the S2 segment (85%±7% vs. 79%±8%; P<0.001) and higher mortality (28.9% vs. 7.7%; P<0.001) after AAD repair compared with patients in the no-RRT group. This study demonstrated there was less attenuation of the FLAR on the abdominal aorta above the ostium of the renal artery in the whole descending aorta after AAD repair with intraoperative right axillary and femur artery perfusion mode. The patients needing RRT were associated with less postoperative/preoperative change of the FLAR and worse clinical outcomes.

Redo mitral surgery after coronary artery bypass grafts under hyperkalemic hypothermia using thoracotomy and axillary artery cannulation in a patient with functioning bilateral internal thoracic arteries and atheromatous aorta

BackgroundRedo mitral valve surgery using resternotomy after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is challenging as previous CABG with patent internal thoracic artery (ITA) poses a risk of injury due to dense adhesion. It is paramount to have alternative method to minimize this risk.Case presentation: We report a case of redo mitral and tricuspid valve repair via right thoracotomy under hypothermia and systemic potassium administration with axillary artery cannulation in a patient after CABG with patent bilateral ITA grafts crossing over the sternum. Herein, critical dissection around the aorta and functioning ITA grafts was avoided by performing the procedure under systemic hypothermia via thoracotomy. Furthermore, considering the presence of atheroma in the aorta, the axillary artery was used as a perfusion route to prevent stroke events. Postoperative course was uneventful and echocardiography demonstrated preserved cardiac function.ConclusionPerforming axillary artery cannulation and right thoracotomy under hypothermic cardiac arrest with systemic hyperkalemia without clamping the patent bilateral ITAs and aorta allowed us to perform redo mitral valve surgery after CABG without major postoperative cardiac or cerebral complications.

Central aortic versus axillary artery cannulation for aortic arch surgery

ObjectiveCentral aortic cannulation for aortic arch surgery has become more popular over the last decade; however, evidence comparing it with axillary artery cannulation remains equivocal. This study compares outcomes of patients who underwent axillary artery and central aortic cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass during arch surgery. MethodsA retrospective review of 764 patients who underwent aortic arch surgery at our institution between 2005 and 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was failure to achieve uneventful recovery, defined as having experienced at least 1 of the following: in-hospital mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, bleeding requiring reoperation, prolonged ventilation, renal failure, mediastinitis, surgical site infection, and pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation. Propensity score matching was used to account for baseline differences across groups. A subgroup analysis of patients undergoing surgery for aneurysmal disease was performed. ResultsBefore matching, the aorta group had more urgent or emergency operations (P = .039), fewer root replacements (P < .001), and more aortic valve replacements (P < .001). After successful matching, there was no difference between the axillary and aorta groups in failure to achieve uneventful recovery, 33% versus 35% (P = .766), in-hospital mortality, 5.3% versus 5.3% (P = 1), or stroke, 8.3% versus 5.3% (P = .264). There were more surgical site infections in the axillary group, 4.8% versus 0.4% (P = .008). Similar results were seen in the aneurysm cohort with no differences in postoperative outcomes between groups. ConclusionsAortic cannulation has a safety profile similar to that of axillary arterial cannulation in aortic arch surgery.

Early results of direct true lumen cannulation (samurai technique) in aortic dissection surgery

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of Direct True Lumen Cannulation (Samurai Technique), axillary artery cannulation and femoral artery cannulation techniques used in aortic dissection surgery. Materials and methods: The data of 124 patients who underwent surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection between February 2018 and December 2022 were analyzed rectospectively. Patients were divided into Group 1 (samurai technique cannulation group) and Group 2 (axillary and femoral cannulation group). Results: When the results were analyzed, preoperative personal and clinical characteristics were found to be similar between the groups. In the inoperative period, the time from skin incision to CPB, hypothermic circulatory arrest time, and time for cooling were shorter in group 1. While there were no cannulation-related complications in group 1, axillary artery dissection developed in two patients in group 2. No significant difference was observed between the groups in postoperative results. Conclusion: Although there were similar results in the groups in the preoperative and postoperative periods, the more positive results in the surgery show that cannulation with the samurai technique is a preferable method.