Axial Spondylitis Research Articles

The association between the severity score of the disease and arterial stiffness in patients with axial spondylitis

Background and objectives. Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the spine and sacral joints, causing back pain and stiffness. Patients with axSpA have double the cardiovascular risk due to ongoing inflammation, leading to higher morbidity and mortality. Early identification of cardiovascular risks is crucial. This study is aimed to depict the link between disease severity and arterial stiffness in axSpA patients. Materials and methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2023, involving axial spondyloarthritis on patients aged 16–60 years who visited the Rheumatology Outpatient Unit at Dr. Soetomo Hospital and met ASAS criteria. Results. Thirty SpA patients participated, consisting of 7 males (23.3%) and 23 females (76.7%). Ages ranged from 18 to 58, with an average of 43.33 ± 13.32. The age distribution included 2 patients aged 26–35 (6.7%), 7 aged 36–45 (23.3%), 9 aged 46–55 (30.0%), and 6 aged 56–65 (20.0%). Treatment duration revealed that 18 patients (60.0%) had been treated for 1–5 years, while 12 patients (40.0%) had been treated for over 5 years. Conclusions. The study found a predominance of female patients aged 46–55, with no significant differences in mSASSS scores by gender or age. In axSpA patients, a strong correlation was observed between mSASSS scores and arterial stiffness, highlighting the relationship between disease severity and cardiovascular risk.

Sacroiliac and spine imaging in spondyloarthritis: Does phenotype or sex matter?

BackgroundSpondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory conditions primarily affecting the axial skeleton, including sacroiliitis and spondylitis, each with distinct features. This study aimed to investigate imaging disparities, focusing on sacroiliac magnetic resonance and spine radiography, across phenotypes and between males and females in axial SpA.MethodA cross-sectional study was conducted to assess clinical data, laboratory findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores of sacroiliac joints using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score (SSS), and cervical and lumbar spine radiographs utilizing the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The study aimed to compare these parameters between two groups: axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, radiographic and non-radiographic) and axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), as well as between males and females.ResultsNinety-four patients were included, with 62 patients in the axSpA group and 32 patients in the axPsA group. There were no differences in disease activity, mobility, radiographic damage in the spine (Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score– mSASSS), or sacroiliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index - SPARCC and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score - SSS) between the two phenotypes. Regarding sex, in imaging exams, men had higher mSASSS (p = 0.008), SSS (p = 0.001), and fat metaplasia (MG) score based on SSS (p = 0.001), while women had significantly higher SPARCC scores (p = 0.039). In the male group, the presence of HLA-B27 allele had an impact on more structural lesions on MRI (SSS), p = 0.013.ConclusionIn this study, imaging of sacroiliac joints and spine in patients with axial SpA did not show differences in phenotypes but did reveal differences based on sex, which may have an impact on future diagnostic recommendations. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Advices for diagnostics of ankylosing spondylitis/axial spondyloarthritis: A review

The article written by a rheumatologist and a radiologist who have long-term experience in diagnostics of ankylosing spondylitis (axial spondylitis), provides advices on rational recognition of these diseases. The first part of the article discusses adequate visualization of the sacroiliac joints and the need for thoughtful consideration of radiological and MRI signs of sacroiliitis, neither of which, taken alone, is pathognomonic. An optimal, from the authors' point of view, algorithm for conducting visualization studies of sacroilial joints is proposed. Numerous situations simulating sacroiliitis are analyzed.

Modern imaging techniques in the diagnosis of axial spondylitis: similarities and differences between axial psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis

Involvement of axial skeletal in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is often associated with inflammatory changes in peripheral joints and is asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, and changes in the spine and sacroiliac joints are often found only on X-ray. The article, which is based on numerous studies, compares the characteristics of axial skeletal lesions in patients with the axial form of psoriatic arthritis (axPsA) and in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and discusses the possibilities of their diagnosis using radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including modern methods such as diffusion-weighted imaging, contrast-enhanced dynamic scanning and whole-body MRI.The main difficulty in diagnosing axPsA is that there is no universally accepted terminology or standardized diagnostic criteria, making it difficult to clearly distinguish axPsA from other forms of axial spondyloarthritis. Determining the first symptoms of axPsA not only helps to make a timely diagnosis and prescribe appropriate treatment, but also to monitor the activity of the disease and the dynamics of structural changes, which allows appropriate adjustment of the therapy needed to improve the quality of life of patients.

On the Interdisciplinary Treatment and Management of Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. A Study on Patients' Personal Experiences and Perspectives.

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (eg, axial spondylitis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and hidradenitis suppurativa) are common diseases that exert an extensive effect on the health-related quality of life, particularly when multiple concomitant conditions are present. Previous reports indicate that the traditional siloed approach to care can lead to a lack of patient centricity and inefficient disease management. In this article, we aimed to evaluate an interdisciplinary program for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases compared to routine clinical practice. This was a mixed-method study, combining qualitative and quantitative data. Patients with co-occurrence of ≥2 immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated in an interdisciplinary clinic (n = 48) or traditional usual care (n = 17) answered open-ended questions about their care experiences. Two independent coders blinded to patients' treatment group coded three aspects of the narratives provided by the patients' responses: Themes, Emotional valence, and Personal growth (ie, redemption). Themes were analyzed descriptively to explore possible differences between patients assigned to the interdisciplinary clinic and patients assigned to the usual care setting. Group differences in patients' emotional experiences were assessed, and we examined potential group differences in positive personal growth. Our findings indicate that an interdisciplinary combined clinic approach provides benefits for patients with multiple inflammatory diseases towards the usual setup. Patients experienced benefits on a number of specific quality-of-life themes including acceptance, optimism, disease understanding, personal growth, and better disease control. The narratives of the patients in the interdisciplinary group were significantly more emotionally positive and included more positive personal growth compared to the usual care group. The findings indicate a patient-reported benefit, especially from the holistic approach and cross-specialty combined consultations in an interdisciplinary clinic compared to usual specialized healthcare, which was underscored by narratives highlighting an overall improved quality of life.

Mapping the challenges: Patient insights from the first ‘Taiwanese Map of Axial Spondylitis’

Mapping the challenges: Patient insights from the first ‘Taiwanese Map of Axial Spondylitis’

Abstract 16 — Are We Treating-to-Target on Spondyloarthritis (SpA)? A One-Year Analysis from the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) SpA Registry

Background This analysis aimed to evaluate the extent of treat-to-target (T2T) achievement after 1-year intensive treatment in patients enrolled to the APLAR SpA registry. Methods Patients who fulfilled the CASPAR2006 for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 2009ASAS criteria for axial spondylitis (AxSpA) were recruited. Current analysis included the first 143 patients reaching the 1-year timepoint across 7 Asia-Pacific regions (Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, India, Pakistan, Qatar and Thailand). Results 79 patients with PsA(age: 52±13 years, 43(55%) male, disease duration: 8.0±8.3 years) and 64 patients with AxSpA (age:41±16 years, 48(75%) male, disease duration: 4.8±7.2 years) were included. There were significant improvement in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) (22.1±14.4 at baseline vs 11.5±10.0 at 1-year, p<0.001) while Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) remained stable. Other characteristics are listed in Table 1. Concerning the medication use, there was an increase in the number of patients receiving biologic/target synthetic disease-modifying drug (b/tsDMARDS, 29% at baseline to 61% at 1-year for PsA, and 52% at baseline to 64% at 1-year for AxSpA) (Fig. 1). Regarding T2T, 62% and 45% of PsA patient achieved DAPSA-low disease activity (DAPSA-LDA) and minimal disease activity (MDA) respectively, while 53% of patients with Axial SpA achieved ASDAS-LDA. The use of b/tsDMARDs was significantly higher in patient who achieved MDA when compared to those who did not (Fig. 1). The MDA/ASDAS-LDA achievement rate were comparable to that of the tight control arm of TICOPA cohort (41%) or TICOSPA study (60%) respectively. Treatment was escalated in 86% of visits when treatment target was not met. The reason for non-escalation of drug included: patients’choice (42%), mild symptoms only and physician decides to keep current regime (27%), adverse events (19%), no viable alternatives (8%) and others (4%). Conclusions Implementing the T2T strategy in patient with SpA was feasible in selected centres from the APLAR region, with similar target achievement rate compared to T2T studies conducted in Europe.

The Effects of Pilates Exercise Training Combined with Walking on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Functional Capacity, and Disease Activity in Patients with Non-Radiologically Confirmed Axial Spondylitis.

The objective of the study was to examine the effects of Pilates exercise training combined with walking on cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, and disease activity in patients with non-radiologically confirmed axial spondylitis (nr-axSpA). Thirty patients with nr-axSpA (seven women (90%), with a mean age of 46.07 ± 10.48 years old and C-reactive protein (CRP) 2.26 ± 2.14 mg/L) were randomly divided into two groups: A (n1 = 15 patients) and B (n2 = 15 patients). Group A followed a 6-month home-based Pilates exercise training program, while Group B remained untrained until the end of the study. A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit-to-stand test (5×STS), sit-and-reach test (SR), back scratch test for the right (BSR) and the left arm (BSL), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) were applied to all patients, both at the beginning and at the end of the study. After 6 months, Group A showed higher values in exercise time by 37.41% (p = 0.001), higher peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) by 25.41% (p = 0.01), a higher ratio between oxygen uptake and maximum heart rate (VO2/HRmax) by 14.83% (p = 0.04), and higher SR by 18.70% (p = 0.007), while lower values were observed in TUG by 24.32% (p = 0.001), 5×STS by 12.13% (p = 0.001), BASDAI score by 20.00% (p = 0.04) and ASDAS score by 23.41% (p = 0.03), compared to Group B. Furthermore, linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation in Group A between BASDAI and 5×STS (r = 0.584, p = 0.02), BASDAI and TUG (r = 0.538, p = 0.03), and ASDAS and 5×STS (r = 0.538, p = 0.03), while a negative correlation was found between BASDAI and VO2peak (r = -0.782, p < 0.001), ASDAS and SR (r = -0.548, p = 0.03), and ASDAS and VO2peak (r = -0.659, p = 0.008). To sum up, cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, and disease activity improved after a long-term Pilates exercise training program in patients with nr-axSpA.

P010 Real world experience of switching to an adalimumab biosimilar; different outcomes for axial spondylitis, psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract Background/Aims Adalimumab is licenced to treat a variety of autoimmune conditions including inflammatory arthropathies. Switching stable patients from the bio-originator Humira to biosimilars has been strongly promoted on economic grounds and presumed equitable interchangeability regarding efficacy and tolerance across all disease indications. Our aims were to assess adalimumab biosimilar retention rates up to 1 year in patients with axial spondylitis (AS), psoriatic (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a routine care setting and to determine by disease subtype reasons for switching back to Humira. Methods Retrospective observational study, utilising data from the St. George’s Hospital Rheumatology Biologics Database. Demographic details, retention duration and reasons for discontinuation for all patients switched from Humira to an adalimumab biosimilar were recorded up to 1 year. Results 238 patients (female 54.5%) were switched from Humira to an adalimumab biosimilar: AS n = 95, PsA n = 82, RA n = 61. Overall, 53% patients switched back to Humira over a 1-year period, female 57%. By disease subtype, the biosimilar retention rate at 1 year was AS 36%, PsA 61%, RA 46%. Overall, the reason for switching back to Humira was an adverse effect or device specific problem (AE) in 59% and loss of efficacy (IR) in 41%. AEs in 98% were pain and other injection site reactions. By disease subtype, the reason for switching back was: AS 59% IR, 41% AE, PsA 22% IR, 78% AE, RA 27% IR, 73% AE. Conclusion Projected cost savings from the adalimumab biosimilar switch programme were not achieved, with 53% returning to Humira up to 1 year later. By disease indication patients with AS had the lowest retention on the biosimilar, in whom loss of efficacy was more likely than an AE to trigger the switch, and over twice as prevalent than in patients with RA and PsA. AEs were the most prevalent reason for PsA and RA patients to switch back, and citrate in the biosimilar buffer solution was the likely reason for this. The loss of efficacy, particularly prevalent in AS patients, implies that equitable interchangeability between Humira and biosimilar products cannot be assumed, and projected cost saving advantages may be overestimated. Disclosure F.A.A. Holden: None. D. Hill: None. P. Kiely: None.

Back pain in young people: algorithm of management in practice of primary physician

Back pain (BP) is a major public health problem worldwide with high prevalence and disability. In most cases are associated with degenerative spinal disease (degenerative disc disease, DDD), myofascial syndrome, facet joint syndrome, spinal spondylosis, scoliotic deformation, sacroilial joint dysfunction, lumbar stenosis and other causes. The article describes the basics of the doctor’s approach to the diagnosis of back pain, describes the main strategies of patients routing. The algorithm proposed here includes detection of dangerous conditions, verification of inflammatory rhythm of BP according to criteria ASAS 2009, revealing of persistent phenotype of the lower back pain, stratifying patients for the risk of chronic lower back pain StarT Back in mechanical rhythm; multidisciplinary approach with inclusion of the rheumatologist in specialists team, and after initial consultation the therapist gives direction to the rheumatologist, if necessary. A therapist who treats a patient with persistent BS and a high risk of chronization without symptoms of “red flags” should prescribe an magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. The detection of total lesion of the vertebral motor segments in the case of severe back pain is the basis for the diagnosis of spinal osteoarthritis and subsequent prescription of non-medicamentous and pharmacological therapy, including SYSADOA, in particular Alflutop. The developed algorithm allows to quickly diagnose spinal osteoarthritis at a young age and to suspect axial spondylitis. Presented triad of MR-traits associated with persistent phenotype pain, which will help the therapist to establish the diagnosis of spinal osteoarthritis. The algorithm clearly describes the routing of patients to related specialists (rheumatologist, neurologist, etc.) according to the identified data.

Sarcopenia and rheumatic diseases: is there any connection?

Sarcopenia is characterized by a loss of skeletal muscle mass, a decrease in muscle strength and/or physical performance, and is one of the main causes for limiting daily activities in the elderly. This is associated with an increased incidence of many adverse events such as dysfunction, falls, frailty, hospitalization, disability, and mortality. Primary (considered as a part of the aging process) and secondary sarcopenia (due to malabsorption, immobility/bed rest, starvation, hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, immune-mediated rheumatic diseases) are united by a chronic inflammatory process of different degrees. Sarcopenia supports one of the most widely accepted theories that low-grade chronic inflammation is important in the pathogenesis of many diseases. For a long time, sarcopenia was considered an age-related disease, but recently it has been reported to be more common in young subjects with autoimmune diseases. In particular, the relationship between sarcopenia and rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis has been studied in detail. Although the pathogenesis of sarcopenia in autoimmune diseases is not fully understood, it is believed that a chronic inflammatory process contributes to the development of loss of muscle mass and strength, and is different depending on the underlying disease. The definition of sarcopenia varies between studies, which complicates and limits direct comparisons. Therefore, in this review, we demonstrate various diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia, focusing on its prevalence in patients with rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, axial spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and systemic sclerosis. We developed a structured search strategy for English language publications in PubMed using the term “sarcopenia” in combination with the following keywords: “inflammation”, “diagnosis”, “criteria”, “muscle mass”, “strength”, “outcomes”, “disability”, “mortality”, “pathophysiology”, “rheumatoid arthritis”, “juvenile arthritis”, “axial spondylitis”, “psoriatic arthritis”, “systemic sclerosis”. We focused on clinical trials, meta-analyses and review articles. Articles published only after 2000 year were included, however, we did not include major contributions published before. The search was completed on October 8, 2022.

The effectiveness of naftalan in the complex physiotherapy in patients with axial spondylitis

The effectiveness of naftalan in the complex physiotherapy in patients with axial spondylitis

Эффективность и безопасность упадацитиниба в лечении псориатического артрита

Psoratic arthritis (PsA) is a common disorder affecting every fifth patient with psoriasis. Typical clinical manifestations of PsA include asymmetric mono/oligoathritis or polyarthritis, spondyloarthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis. More rarely PsA is associated with uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease. Upadacitinib is a selective JAK-kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of PsA. Its efficacy and favorable safety profile in PsA patients were established in two randomized placebocontrolled phase 3 clinical trials (SELECT-PsA 1 and 2). In both studies, upadacitinib was significantly more effective than placebo and improved activity of PsA, psoriatic lesions, enthesitis and dactylitis. Moreover, upadacitinib is approved for treatment of axial spondylitis and, therefore, can be used in patients with any manifestations of PsA. The authors present clinical cases of PsA and discuss indications for upadacitinib administration in such patients.

Identification and structure-based drug design of cell-active inhibitors of interleukin 17A at a novel C-terminal site

Anti-IL17A therapies have proven effective for numerous inflammatory diseases including psoriasis, axial spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Modulating and/or antagonizing protein–protein interactions of IL17A cytokine binding to its cell surface receptors with oral therapies offers the promise to bring forward biologics-like efficacy in a pill to patients. We used an NMR-based fragment screen of recombinant IL17A to uncover starting points for small molecule IL17A antagonist discovery. By examining chemical shift perturbations in 2D [1H, 13C-HSQC] spectra of isotopically labeled IL17A, we discovered fragments binding the cytokine at a previously undescribed site near the IL17A C-terminal region, albeit with weak affinity (> 250 µM). Importantly this binding location was distinct from previously known chemical matter modulating cytokine responses. Subsequently through analog screening, we identified related compounds that bound symmetrically in this novel site with two copies. From this observation we employed a linking strategy via structure-based drug design and obtained compounds with increased binding affinity (< 50 nM) and showed functional inhibition of IL17A-induced cellular signaling (IC50~1 µM). We also describe a fluorescence-based probe molecule suitable to discern/screen for additional molecules binding in this C-terminal site.

Worse scores but similar patterns of disease activity: interpreting outcomes in women with axial spondyloarthropathy

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sex on disease activity in axial spondylitis (axSpA). Method Data were extracted from the Ankylosing Spondylitis Registry of Ireland (ASRI). In this cross-sectional study, patients were analysed on the basis of sex, with a series of comparison analyses performed. Results Overall, 886 participants were enrolled in the ASRI [232 (26.2%) women, 644 (72.6%) men]. Females recorded significantly worse Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (4.57 vs 3.83, p < 0.01) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire (ASQoL) (7.51 vs 6.12, p < 0.01) scores than males. There was a stronger correlation in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional and Metrology Indices (BASFI and BASMI) in females (rs = 0.619, p < 0.01) than in males (rs = 0.572, p < 0.01). Analysis of factors in BASDAI revealed that the higher total scores in females compared to males were due not to any single component, but to worse scores in all six components of the BASDAI combined. Ranking of components by severity between sexes revealed identical ranking in four of the six components of the BASDAI. Conclusions Women with axSpA reported significantly worse disease activity, quality of life, and functional ability than men. However, the BASDAI capturedsimilar patterns of disease activity. Limitation of spinal mobility in women with axSpA corresponded to greater impairment in functional ability. Further evaluation of disease monitoring tools is required to ensure that disease activity is accurately captured in men and women with axSpA.

The use of biosimilars as a new approach to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

The article discusses various options for the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in accordance with modern foreign and domestic recommendations. Data on the possibility of achieving an effect on the background of monotherapy with methotrexate (MT) are presented and options for more active therapy are discussed. The authors compare the effectiveness of sequential change of basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs), sequential addition of DMARDs to MT, treatment with a triple combination of DMARDs with an inadequate response to MT or in the debut of therapy, combination of DMARDs and biological drugs. According to the study data, in cohorts of patients with equal clinical effectiveness of the triple combination of DMARDs and the combination of DMARDs with biological drugs, however, the severity of the progression of destruction in the joints of the hands and feet is less when using biological agents. It was noted that the evaluation of the effectiveness of the double / triple combination of DMARDs was carried out in open observational studies, which has less evidence value than randomized controlled double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) for the assessment of biological drugs. Despite the importance of implementing biological drugs in clinical practice, their high cost limits their use by patients. Registration in the Russian Federation of the first biosimilar of etanercept (ETN) - the drug Erelzi is important for the treatment of patients with RA. The article describes the advantages of original ETN (tumor necrosis factor ainhibitor - iFNO a) over other iFNO a, which are monoclonal antibodies to this cytokine. The article presents data on the equivalence of the ETN biosimilar registered in the Russian Federation (Erelzi) with the original ETN in terms of clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity. The comparability of drugs in terms of the frequency of adverse events was demonstrated. It is shown that switching from the original ETN to its biosimilar allows you to maintain the effect, not accompanied by an increase in the frequency of intolerance or immunogenicity. It is indicated that Erelzi is registered in the Russian Federation for the treatment of RA, various variants of axial spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

POS0261 DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE AND CLINICAL UTILITY OF TWO REFERRAL RULES FOR INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS

Background:The Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort (REACH) rule [1] and Clinical Arthritis RulE (CARE) [2] are both evidence-based and easy-to-use methods developed to identify the presence of inflammatory arthritis (IA) in patients suspected by their general practitioner (GP). However, the clinical utility of both models in daily clinical practice in an independent primary care setting has not yet been established. While developed for recognizing IA, we believe that it is also important that the broader spectrum of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) is correctly classified from primary care, to facilitate appropriate referral towards outpatient rheumatology clinics.Objectives:The primary objective was to determine the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of the REACH and CARE referral rules in identifying IA in an independent population of unselected suspected patients from primary care. Secondly we will assess the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of both models in identifying IRDs.Methods:This prospective observational diagnostic study consisted of adults newly suspected by their GP for the need of referral to the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the Maasstad Hospital in Rotterdam. Primary outcome was IA, consisting of rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Secondary outcome was IRD, defined as IA plus arthritis in systemic disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis and morbus sjögren. Rheumatologist diagnosis was used as gold standard. To evaluate the clinical performance of the REACH and CARE referral rules in this population, diagnostic accuracy measures were investigated using the Youden index (J) [3]. Moreover, a net benefit approach [4] was used to determine clinical utility of both rules when compared to usual care.Results:This study consisted of 250 patients (22.8% male) with a mean age of 50.8 years (SD 13.9 years). In total 42 (17%) patients were diagnosed with IA and 55 (22%) with an IRD. Figure 1 presents the diagnostic performance in IA (Figure 1A) and in IRD (Figure 1B). For the primary outcome, the REACH model shows an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.80) and the optimal cut-off point is indicated (J). The CARE model shows an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.88) and at J there is a somewhat higher sensitivity and specificity. When taking the broader spectrum of IRDs as outcome, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI 0.58-0.74) for the REACH and 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.83) for the CARE model. The net benefit analysis with either IA or IRD as outcome showed that the CARE was of the highest clinical value when compared to usual care.Conclusion:Both the REACH and CARE model showed a good diagnostic performance for detecting IA in an independent population of unselected suspected patients from primary care. Although not specifically developed to recognize the entire spectrum of IRDs, the CARE shows a good performance in doing so. When evaluating clinical utility, we see that both rules have a net benefit in recognizing IA as well as IRDs compared to usual care, however the CARE shows superiority over the REACH. By using the CARE, over half of all suspected patients can be withheld from expensive outpatient rheumatology care, implied by the high specificity of 70%. These results support the idea that incorporating these easy-to-use methods into primary care could lead to providing patients the right care at the right place and improving value based health care.

The Role of Osteoclasts in Psoriatic Arthritis

Abstract Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease related to psoriasis involving bone and cartilage. It is a heterogeneous disorder with a variety of clinical manifestations, which can include peripheral arthritis, axial spondylitis, enthesitis, skin and nail disease, dactylitis, uveitis, osteitis, inflammatory bowel disease. The distinctive feature of PsA is enthesitis. The characteristic bone erosion at the bone–pannus junction in PsA is mediated by osteoclasts, which are multinucleated giant cells derived from hematopoietic stem cells. Although the pathological mechanism of osteoclasts in PsA is mainly related to the destruction of the diseased joint, the exact pathogenesis of PsA is complex and the factors involved in initiation and termination of osteoclast need to be further explored. Much attention has been paid to the importance of osteoclast in psoriasis arthritis for decades. Based on the role of osteoclasts in PsA, our review discusses the formation and characteristics of multinucleated osteoclasts in PsA, summarizes current developments in osteoclast-related pathways in PsA including classical receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB-receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand-osteoprotegerin pathway and immunomodulatory factors, as well as their advances and corresponding treatment. At present, the molecular and signal pathway that interacts with osteoclasts in the pathogenesis of PSA has not been fully elucidated, therefore more detailed studies are expected in the near future.

P281 52-Week efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in r-axSpA/AS patients naïve to biologic treatments or with prior inadequate response/intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Abstract Background Radiographic axial spondylitis (r-axSpA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS), is a chronic inflammatory disease of the axial skeleton associated with serious pain, stiffness and limited flexibility, impairing quality of life. Two clinical trials demonstrated efficacy and safety of ixekizumab (IXE), a humanised anti-IL-17 IgG4 antibody, in r-axSpA/AS patients naïve to biologics, or with prior inadequate response/intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) over 16 weeks. This study assessed the treatment effect over 52 weeks. Additionally, the influence of baseline inflammation, measured by C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or spinal MRI on ASAS40 response at week 16 was investigated. Methods Data from two Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trials, with patients who fulfilled the Assessment of Spondylo-Arthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for AS and were either biologic-naïve (COAST-V, NCT02696785) or TNFi-experienced (COAST-W, NCT02696798), were analysed. We compared the proportion of patients achieving ASAS20/40, a 50% improvement of baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50) and assessed the change in spinal pain. Missing data was handled by using non-responder imputation for ASAS20/40 and BASDAI50 response rates and modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF) for spinal pain change from baseline. To investigate the influence of baseline inflammation on the efficacy, we examined the ASAS40 response at week 16 by baseline CRP (normal; ≤5 or elevated; &amp;gt;5 mg/L) and/or MRI Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) spine score (&amp;lt;2 or ≥ 2) using an integrated COAST-V/W dataset. Results At week 16, significantly more IXE than PBO-treated patients achieved ASAS20/40 and BASDAI50 and a decrease in spinal pain. Decreases in disease activity were maintained through week 52 (Table 1). These outcomes occurred in both biologic-naïve and TNFi-experienced patients. Safety outcomes were consistent with previous IXE studies. At week 16, in the integrated dataset, significantly more IXE than PBO-treated patients achieved ASAS40 response regardless of baseline CRP or MRI spine SPARCC score. Conclusion Through week 52, treatment with IXE resulted in sustained efficacy in biologic-naïve and TNFi-experienced AS patients with no unexpected safety signals. Furthermore, at week 16, IXE demonstrated efficacy (ASAS40) irrespective of baseline CRP levels or spinal MRI score. Disclosures K. Gaffney: Consultancies; Abbvie, Eli Lilly, UCB, Novartis. Member of speakers’ bureau; Eli Lilly, UCB, Novartis. Grants/research support; Abbvie, Pfizer. D. Aletaha: Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Sanofi/Genzyme. Grants/research support; Abbvie, Novartis, Roche. A.J. Bradley: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly employee. Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly. M.H. Nassab: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly employee. S. Liu Leage: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly employee. R. Micheroli: None.

Updated ACR guidelines for the management of axial spondylitis

The paper provides the updated American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.