Axial Rotation Moments Research Articles

Comparison of a Novel Posterior Integrated Transfixation Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Approach to the Posterolateral and Lateral Approaches: A Cadaveric Biomechanical and Computational Analysis of the Fixation, Invasiveness, and Fusion Area.

To concurrently assess and compare the fixation efficacy, invasiveness, and fusion potential of a posterior integrated transfixation cage system to the posterolateral threaded implant and lateral triangular rod systems, in a cadaveric model. Twelve (12) cadaveric sacroiliac joint specimens were utilized and tested within the single-leg stance multidirectional pure moment bending model. Each specimen was tested in the intact, destabilized, treated (using posterior, posterolateral, and lateral systems), and post-fatigue conditions by applying 0 to ± 7.5 Nm of moment in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending while measuring the angular range of motion between the sacrum and ilium. Computational models were reconstructed from Computed Tomography (CT) scans and manufacturer surgical technique guides. The models were utilized to quantify the volume of bone removed during implantation and the surface area available for fusion. The posterior integrated transfixation cage system and the lateral triangular rods produced equivalent motion reduction in all motion planes (P > 0.583). The posterolateral cylindrical threaded implant produced less motion reductions than the posterior and lateral implants in flexion-extension (6% ± 3% vs 37% ± 10% and 33% ± 11%, respectively, P <0.05). The posterior system removed 22%-60% less bone volume from the sacrum and ilium (P<0.10), introduced 200%-270% more implant surface to the joint space (P<0.01) and decorticated 75%-375% more joint surface area (P<0.01). The posterior integrated transfixation single-implant cage system is superior to the posterolateral cylindrical threaded single-implant system. Its performance in osteopenic bone is equivalent to the lateral triangular rod system in healthy bone; however, the posterior integrated transfixation cage system requires a single implant, while the lateral triangular rod system requires three. The posterior implant removes the least bone volume and has the most surface area for fusion, providing a significantly better opportunity for robust sacroiliac joint arthrodesis.

Analysis of lumbar spine loading during walking in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls: An OpenSim-Based study.

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent and disabling disease worldwide. However, the specific biomechanical changes due to LBP are still controversial. The purpose of this study was to estimate the lumbar and lower limb kinematics, lumbar moments and loads, muscle forces and activation during walking in healthy adults and LBP. A total of 18 healthy controls and 19 patients with chronic LBP were tested for walking at a comfortable speed. The kinematic and dynamic data of the subjects were collected by 3D motion capture system and force plates respectively, and then the motion simulation was performed by OpenSim. The OpenSim musculoskeletal model was used to calculate lumbar, hip, knee and ankle joint angle variations, lumbar moments and loads, muscle forces and activation of eight major lumbar muscles. In our results, significant lower lumbar axial rotation angle, lumbar flexion/extension and axial rotation moments, as well as the muscle forces of the four muscles and muscle activation of two muscles were found in patients with LBP than those of the healthy controls (p < 0.05). This study may help providing theoretical support for the evaluation and rehabilitation treatment intervention of patients with LBP.

Coupled rotation patterns in cervical spine axial rotation can change when the head is kept level

The biomechanical literature describes axial rotation occurring coupled with lateral bending and flexion in the cervical spine. Since the head is kept level during some activities of daily living, we set out to investigate the changes in total and segmental motion that occur when a level gaze constraint is applied to cadaveric cervical spine specimens during axial rotation. 1.5Nm of left and right axial rotation moment was applied to sixteen C2-T1 cadaveric specimens with C2 unconstrained and C2 constrained to simulate level gaze. Overall and segmental motions were determined using optoelectronic motion measurement and specimen-specific kinematic modeling. Without a kinematic constraint on C2, motions were as described in the literature; namely, flexion and lateral bending to the same side as axial rotation. Keeping C2 level reduced that total axial rotation range of motion of the specimens. Changes were also produced in segmental coupled rotation in all specimens. The observed changes included completely opposite coupled motion than in the uncoupled specimens, and traditional coupled behavior at one load extreme and the opposite at the other extreme. Constraining C2 during axial rotation to simulate level gaze can produce coupled motion that differs from the classically described flexion and lateral bending to the same side as axial rotation.Statement of Clinical Significance: Activities of daily living that require the head to be kept level during axial rotation of the cervical spine may produce segmental motions that are quite different from the classically described motions with implications for biomechanical experiments and implant designers.

Design and Biomechanical Evaluation of a Bidirectional Expandable Cage for Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery is a minimally invasive spinal surgery technique that has become increasingly popular in recent years. The primary objective of the current study was to design a minimally invasive expandable fusion device that can reduce iatrogenic nerve damage and minimize endplate damage during OLIF surgery, while restoring intervertebral height and alignment. The second objective was to use finite element analysis to evaluate the biomechanical stability of the newly designed expandable fusion device after implantation into the intervertebral space. A new bidirectional expandable cage was designed in this study. A finite element model (FEM) of L3-L5 lumbar segment was modified to simulate decompression and fusion. The modified FEMs were constructed in the following cases: intact model, bidirectional expandable cage (alone, with unilateral pedicle screws [UPSs], and with bilateral pedicle screws [BPSs]) model, conventional OLIF cage (alone, with UPSs, and with BPSs) model. To simulate physiological loadings, the models were subjected to a follower compressive pre-load of 400 N, in addition to 8.0 Nm of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments. All modified FEMs exhibited a significant reduction in motion at L3-L5 compared to the intact model. Among the fusion models, the bidirectional expandable cage (BEC) with BPS model displayed the highest stiffness and demonstrated a reduced range of motion (48.5%-75.7%). Additionally, the peak stress on the endplate in the conventional OLIF cage (Conv-OLIF) model was generally lower than that in the BEC models. The cage in the BEC ALONE model exhibited the highest stress (93.87-176.3 MPa) on the endplate in most motion modes, while the cage in the Conv-OLIF+BPS model had the lowest stress (16.67-30.58 MPa) on the endplate in most motion modes. The maximum stress on the fixation in the BEC fusion models was generally lower than that in the Conv-OLIF fusion group under the same loading conditions. The OLIF ALONE model had the lowest stress on the adjacent disc, while the stress level in the BEC ALONE model was very close to it. The BEC implanted models had higher stiffness, and more proper stress distribution on the posterior fixation was comparable to that of the Conv-OLIF models. However, the endplate stress peaks and cage stress peaks of the BEC models were slightly higher than those of the Conv-OLIF models, though still within a clinically acceptable range. Taking into account both biomechanical and clinical perspectives, BEC-assisted unilateral pedicle screw fixation meet clinical demand and may serve as a viable alternative to Conv-OLIF fusion.

Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Lumbar Instrumented Fusions in Adult Spinal Deformity According to the Upper and Lower Fusion Levels: A Finite Element Analysis.

Multilevel lumbar fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation is a widely performed surgical procedure for the management of adult spinal deformity. However, there has not been a comprehensive biomechanical study on the different types of fusion levels in terms of stability and possible complications. We aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of multilevel lumbar fusion according to different types of upper and lower fusion levels. Six different types of fusions were performed using three-dimensional finite element models. Type A and B referred to the group of which upper fusion level was L1 and T10, respectively. Subtype 1, 2, and 3 referred to the group of which lower fusion level was L5, S1, and ilium, respectively (A1, L1-L5; A2, L1-S1; A3, L1-ilium; B1, T10-L5; B2, T10-S1; B3, T10-ilium). Flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending moments were applied, and the risk of screw loosening and failure and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) was analyzed. Stress at the bone-screw interface of type B3 was lowest in overall motions. The risk of screw failure showed increasing pattern as the upper and lower levels extended in all motions. Proximal range of motion (ROM) increased as the lower fusion level changed from L5 to S1 and the ilium. For axial rotation, type B3 showed higher proximal ROM (16.2°) than type A3 (11.8°). In multilevel lumbar fusion surgery for adult spinal deformity, adding iliac screws and increasing the fusion level to T10-ilium may lower the risk of screw loosening. In terms of screw failure and proximal ASD, however, T10-ilium fusion has a higher potential risk compared with other fusion types. These results will contribute for surgeons to provide adequate patient education regarding screw failure and proximal ASD, when performing multilevel lumbar fusion.

Evaluation of nucleus pulposus fluid velocity and pressure alteration induced by cartilage endplate sclerosis using a poro-elastic finite element analysis.

The nucleus pulposus (NP) in the intervertebral disk (IVD) depends on diffusive fluid transport for nutrients through the cartilage endplate (CEP). Disruption in fluid exchange of the NP is considered a cause of IVD degeneration. Furthermore, CEP calcification and sclerosis are hypothesized to restrict fluid flow between the NP and CEP by decreasing permeability and porosity of the CEP matrix. We performed a finite element analysis of an L3-L4 lumbar functional spine unit with poro-elastic constitutive equations. The aim of the study was to predict changes in the solid and fluid parameters of the IVD and CEP under structural changes in CEP. A compressive load of 500N was applied followed by a 10Nm moment in extension, flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation to the L3-L4 model with fully saturated IVD, CEP, and cancellous bone. A healthy case of L3-L4 physiology was then compared to two cases of CEP sclerosis: a calcified cartilage endplate and a fluid constricted sclerotic cartilage endplate. Predicted NP fluid velocity increased for the calcified CEP and decreased for the calcified + less permeable CEP. Decreased NP fluid velocity was prominent in the axial direction through the CEP due to a less permeable path available for fluid flux. Fluid pressure and maximum principal stress in the NP were predicted to increase in both cases of CEP sclerosis compared to the healthy case. The porous medium predictions of this analysis agree with the hypothesis that CEP sclerosis decreases fluid flow out of the NP, builds up fluid pressure in the NP, and increases the stress concentrations in the NP solid matrix.

Biomechanical Comparison of Lumbar Fixed-Point Oblique Pulling Manipulation and Traditional Oblique Pulling Manipulation in Treating Lumbar Intervertebral Disk Protrusion

ObjectiveTo compare the biomechanical effect of lumbar fixed-point oblique pulling manipulation and traditional oblique pulling manipulation in the treatment of protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disk, and investigate the influence of disk degeneration on the 2 manipulations. MethodsThree finite element models including 1 normal model, 1 mild degeneration, and 1 moderate degeneration model of L3-S1 were developed to simulate 2 oblique pulling manipulations. The disk protrusion was assumed to be in the left central and subarticular zone of the L4-L5 disk, and manipulations were carried out on the right. A 15-Nm right axial rotation moment and 150-N compressive loading were imposed on the upper endplate of L3 to simulate a traditional oblique pulling manipulation. To simulate lumbar fixed-point oblique pulling manipulation, in addition to a 15-Nm moment and 150-N compressive loading imposed on the L3 upper endplate, a 50-N force was imposed on the right lateral area of the L4 spinous process in a left front direction. The displacement and stress in the left central and subarticular zone of the L4-L5 disk were calculated and compared in the 3 models. ResultsThe average displacement and stress in the left central and subarticular zone of L4-L5 disk were higher in fixed-point oblique pulling manipulation than those in traditional oblique pulling manipulation (P < .05). In addition, the values of average stress and displacement decreased significantly with the increase of lumbar disk degeneration (P < .05). ConclusionLumbar fixed-point oblique pulling manipulation showed a better biomechanical effect than traditional oblique pulling manipulation, and lumbar disk degeneration affected the 2 manipulations adversely in the virtual treatment of protrusion of the lumbar intervertebral disk using finite element models.

Stabilizing effect of the rib cage on adjacent segment motion following thoracolumbar posterior fixation of the human thoracic cadaveric spine: A biomechanical study

BackgroundAlthough the rib cage provides substantial stability to the thoracic spine, few biomechanical studies have incorporated it into their testing model, and no studies have determined the influence of the rib cage on adjacent segment motion of long fusion constructs. The present biomechanical study aimed to determine the mechanical contribution of the intact rib cage during the testing of instrumented specimens. MethodsA cyclic loading (CL) protocol with instrumentation (T4–L2 pedicle screw-rod fixation) was conducted on five thoracic spines (C7–L2) with intact rib cages. Range of motion (±5 Nm pure moment) in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation was captured for intact ribs, partial ribs, and no ribs conditions. Comparisons at the supra-adjacent (T2–T3), adjacent (T3–T4), first instrumented (T4–T5), and second instrumented (T5–T6) levels were made between conditions (P ≤ 0.05). FindingsA trend of increased motion at the adjacent level was seen for partial ribs and no ribs in all 3 bending modes. This trend was also observed at the supra-adjacent level for both conditions. No significant changes in motion compared to the intact ribs condition were seen at the first and second instrumented levels (P > 0.05). InterpretationThe segment adjacent to long fusion constructs, which may appear more grossly unstable when tested in the disarticulated spine, is reinforced by the rib cage. In order to avoid overestimating adjacent level motion, when testing the effectiveness of surgical techniques of the thoracic spine, inclusion of the rib cage may be warranted to better reflect clinical circumstances.

Cadaveric biomechanical testing of torque - to - failure magnitude of Bilateral Apical Vertebral Derotation maneuver in the thoracic spine.

It remains unclear what is the real safe limit of torque magnitude during Bilateral Apical Vertebral Derotation (BAVD) in thoracic curve correction. Up to author’s knowledge there is no study except this one, to reproduce in–vivo real measurements and intraoperative conditions during BAVD maneuver. The objective of this study was to evaluate the torsional strength of the instrumented thoracic spine under axial rotation moment as well as to define safety limits under BAVD corrective maneuver in scoliosis surgery. 10 fresh, full-length, young and intact human cadavers were tested. After proper assembly of the apparatus, the torque was applied through its apical part, simulating thoracic curve derotation. During each experiment the torque magnitude and angular range of derotation were evaluated. For more accurate analysis after every experiment the examined section of the spine was resected from the cadaver and evaluated morphologically and with a CT scan. The average torque to failure during BAVD simulation was 73,3 ± 5,49Nm. The average angle of BAVD to failure was 44,5 ± 8,16°. The majority of failures were in apical area. There was no significant difference between the fracture occurrence of left or right side of lateral wall of the pedicle. There was no spinal canal breach and/or medial wall failure in any specimen. The safety limits of thoracic spine and efficacy of BAVD for axial plane correction in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) were established. It provided qualitative and quantitative information essential for the spinal derotation under safe loading limits.

294. Coupled rotation patterns in cervical axial rotation can change when the head is kept level

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Axial rotation of the cervical spine with the cranium held level occurs during certain daily activities such as looking over one's shoulder when walking or driving. These activities require rotation from the suboccipital and subaxial cervical spine. The literature on cervical spine axial rotation and coupled rotations has been obtained from experiments where the segmental axis of rotation is aligned with the global axis of rotation. In looking over one's shoulder, the segmental rotation axes may not be aligned with the global and primarily vertical rotation axis due to curvature of the spine. Furthermore, fusion may limit the amount of rotation that can be obtained from the subaxial spine and reduce the facility with which the daily activities are performed. PURPOSE (1) To define the rotation of the intact subaxial spine during horizontal axial rotation of the cranium, and (2) To measure the effect of C5-C7 fusion on the rotation of the subaxial spine during horizontal axial rotation of the cranium. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Biomechanical experiment. PATIENT SAMPLE Five C0-T1 cadaveric spine specimens (38-54 years old, 3 female and 2 male). OUTCOME MEASURES Rotation of the subaxial cervical spine in response to applied axial rotation moment. METHODS A left and right axial rotation moment of 1Nm was applied to specimens mounted in an apparatus that held the cranium in an orientation consistent with horizontal gaze (horizontal Frankfort line). The axial rotation axis passed through the midpoint between the two external auditory meatuses. Rotations of the individual vertebrae before and after C5-C7 fusion using lateral mass screws and posterior rods were measured using an optoelectronic motion measurement system. RESULTS C5-C7 fusion reduced the C3-T1 axial rotation range of motion from a mean of 31±5° to 22±5°. In the nonfused levels, the axial rotation range of motion changed less than half a degree. Holding the cranium level (horizontal gaze) changes the segmental and overall coupled rotation behavior of the cervical spine during axial rotation. In 3 specimens, left axial rotation induced both right lateral bending in the lower segments and left lateral bending in upper segments, and vice versa with right axial rotation. In the three specimens in which both left and right lateral bending was induced by axial rotation, there was a 0.1° to 3.7° reduction in the coupled C3-C4 lateral bending range of motion. In the other two specimen, C3-C4 lateral bending range of motion increased by 0.8° to 1.8°. C5-C7 fusion changed the amount but not the direction of coupled lateral bending of unfused segments. CONCLUSIONS Without the horizontal gaze constraint, right axial rotation has been shown to induce right lateral bending in the cervical spine. There are various activities of daily living, such as looking over one's shoulder, that involve holding the gaze horizontal while axially rotating the cervical spine. In this biomechanical experiment, a constrained horizontal axial rotation resulted in specimen-specific coupled rotation of the subaxial cervical spine. In three of the specimen, axial rotation induced left and right segmental lateral bending regardless of the axial rotation direction.This specimen-specific difference in the coupled lateral bending and in the ability to perform constrained axial rotation after C5-C7 fusion leads us to wonder whether there may also be a patient-specific difference. This difference would have clinical implications for patients who are candidates for C5-C7 fusion. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

The moment arms of the muscles spanning the glenohumeral joint: a systematic review.

The moment arm of a muscle represents its leverage or torque-producing capacity, and is indicative of the role of the muscle in joint actuation. The objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the moment arms of the major muscles spanning the glenohumeral joint during abduction, flexion and axial rotation. Moment arm data for the deltoid, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, teres major, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis and teres minor were reported when measured using the geometric and tendon excursion methods. The anterior and middle sub-regions of the deltoid had the largest humeral elevator moment arm values of all muscles during coronal- and scapular-plane abduction, as well as during flexion. The pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and teres major had the largest depressor moment arms, with each of these muscles exhibiting prominent leverage in shoulder adduction, and the latissimus dorsi and teres major also in extension. The rotator cuff muscles had the largest axial rotation moment arms regardless of the axial position of the humerus. The supraspinatus had the most prominent elevator moment arms during early abduction in both the coronal and scapular planes as well as in flexion. This systematic review shows that the rotator cuff muscles function as humeral rotators and weak humeral depressors or elevators, while the three sub-regions of the deltoid behave as substantial humeral elevators throughout the range of humeral motion. The pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and teres major are significant shoulder depressors, particularly during abduction. This study provides muscle moment arm data on functionally relevant shoulder movements that are involved in tasks of daily living, including lifting and pushing. The results may be useful in quantifying shoulder muscle function during specific planes of movement, in designing and validating computational models of the shoulder, and in planning surgical procedures such as tendon transfer surgery.

The rib cage reduces intervertebral disc pressures in cadaveric thoracic spines by sharing loading under applied dynamic moments

The effects of the rib cage on thoracic spine loading are not well studied, but the rib cage may provide stability or share loads with the spine. Intervertebral disc pressure provides insight into spinal loading, but such measurements are lacking in the thoracic spine. Thus, our objective was to examine thoracic intradiscal pressures under applied pure moments, and to determine the effect of the rib cage on these pressures. Human cadaveric thoracic spine specimens were positioned upright in a testing machine, and Dynamic pure moments (0 to ±5 N·m) with a compressive follower load of 400 N were applied in axial rotation, flexion - extension, and lateral bending. Disc pressures were measured at T4-T5 and T8-T9 using needle-mounted pressure transducers, first with the rib cage intact, and again after the rib cage was removed. Changes in pressure vs. moment slopes with rib cage removal were examined. Pressure generally increased with applied moments, and pressure-moment slope increased with rib cage removal at T4-T5 for axial rotation, extension, and lateral bending, and at T8-T9 for axial rotation. The results suggest the intact rib cage carried about 62% and 56% of axial rotation moments about T4-T5 and T8-T9, respectively, as well as 42% of extension moment and 36–43% of lateral bending moment about T4-T5 only. The rib cage likely plays a larger role in supporting moments than compressive loads, and may also play a larger role in the upper thorax than the lower thorax.

Comparison of biomechanical effect between oblique Ban-pulling manipulation and lumbar erection-rotation manipulation in sitting position for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation

To compare the biomechanical effects between oblique Ban-pulling manipulation and lumbar erection-rotation manipulation in sitting position in treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH). A three-dimensional finite element model of L3-S1 was developed to carry out a comparative study between oblique Ban-pulling manipulation and lumbar erection and rotation manipulation in sitting position. The disc protrusion was assumed to be on the rear left of L4 disc, and the manipulations were performed on the right side. The loading process was simulated by two steps. In the first step, only the compression loading was imposed, and in the second step, both the compression loading and axial rotation moment were imposed. The displacement and stress distribution in L4 disc were investigated. The values of stress and displacement in the second step were lower than those in the first step in each manipulation. The stress and displacement differences between the two steps were respectively 1.79 times and 3.03 times larger in oblique Ban-pulling manipulation than those in lumbar erection-rotation manipulation in sitting position. Oblique Ban-pulling manipulation may result in a better biomechanical effect than lumbar erection-rotation manipulation in sitting position for LIDH.

The biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the intervertebral disc and facet joints in the cervical spine

Background ContextFacet tropism is defined as the angular difference between the left and the right facet orientation. Facet tropism was suggested to be associated with the disc degeneration and facet degeneration in the lumbar spine. However, little is known about the relationship between facet tropism and pathologic changes in the cervical spine and the mechanism behind. PurposeThis study was conducted to investigate the biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the intervertebral disc and facet joints. Study DesignA finite element analysis study. MethodsThe computed tomography (CT) scans of a 28-year-old male volunteer was used to construct the finite element model. First, a symmetrical cervical model from C2 to C7 was constructed. The facet orientations at each level were simulated using the data from our previously published study. Second, the facet orientations at the C5–C6 level were altered to simulate facet tropism with respect to the sagittal plane. The angular difference of the moderate facet tropism model was set to be 7 degrees, whereas the severe facet tropism model was set to be 14 degrees. The inferior of the C7 vertebra was fixed. A 75 N follower loading was applied to simulate the weight of the head. A 1.0 N⋅m moments was applied on the odontoid process of the C2 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. ResultsThe intradiscal pressure (IDP) at the C5–C6 level of the severe facet tropism model increased by 49.02%, 57.14%, 39.06%, and 30.67%, under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments, in comparison with the symmetrical model. The contact force of the severe facet tropism model increased by 35.64%, 31.74%, 79.26%, and 59.47% from the symmetrical model under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. ConclusionsFacet tropism with respect to the sagittal plane at the C5–C6 level increased the IDP and facet contact force under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The results suggested that facet tropism might be the anatomic risk factor of the development of cervical disc degeneration or facet degeneration. Future clinical studies are in need to verify the biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the development of degenerative changes in the cervical spine.

C1 Posterior Arch Crossing Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability

Anatomical measurements and in vitro biomechanical testing were performed to evaluate a new method for posterior C1 fixation. This study sought to assess C1 posterior arch crossing screw fixation for posterior C1-C2 fixation, using anatomical measurements and biomechanical testing with traditional C1 pedicle screws (PS) in a cadaveric model. Atlantoaxial instability often requires surgery, and the current methods for atlas fixation incur some risk to the vascular and neurological tissues. Thus, new, effective, and safe methods are needed for salvage operations. Morphometric analysis of the C1 posterior arch was performed using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Six fresh ligamentous human cervical spines (C0-C4) were evaluated for their biomechanics. The specimens were tested in their intact condition and after stabilization (C1-C2 PS, C1 posterior arch screws [PAS] with C2 PS) and injury due to 1.5 N·m of pure moment in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. During testing, 3-dimensional angular motion was measured with a motion capture platform (Vicon Nexus). Data for all scenarios were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed. Anatomical assessment indicated that 91.51% of C1 posterior tubercles exceeded 7 mm in thickness, 93.40% had a width of the posterior arch of greater than 3.5 mm, and 65.57% had a unilateral screw length of greater than 15 mm, indicating that the posterior arch fixation could be achieved by two 3.5 × 15-mm screws placed in a crossed manner. Twenty-two cases (11%) were not suitable for crossing screw placement because the posterior arch was flat and the entry point was present on the same side. Biomechanical testing showed that the PS and PAS rod-screw systems significantly reduced flexibility in flexion, extension, and rotation compared with the intact position. For lateral bending, there was a trend for the C1 PS and PAS systems toward decreased flexibility in comparison with the intact position. At the same time, C1 PAS decreased C1-C2 movement by 33.0% in left bending (P = 0.171) and 24.4% in right bending (P = 0.095); however, no significant difference was observed for left bending with C1 PAS compared with C1 PS, and the C1 PS and PAS systems significantly reduced the flexibility more than destabilization. Crossing screw fixation of the C1 posterior arch is straightforward and imposes little risk of injury to the neural and vascular structures as long as the implants remain intraosseous. According to the results of our anatomical and biomechanical study, C1 posterior arch crossing screw fixation may constitute an alternative method for posterior atlantoaxial fixation. 3.

Anterior Release Generates More Thoracic Rotation Than Posterior Osteotomy

Biomechanical testing of human cadaveric spines. To determine the effect of anterior and posterior anatomic structures on the rotational stability of the thoracic spine. Historically, large and/or stiff spinal deformities were treated with anterior release to facilitate correction. However, anterior release increases risks and requires a 2-part procedure. Recently, large or rigid deformities have been treated with a single posterior procedure using pedicle screws and spinal osteotomies. No study has yet evaluated the effect of anterior release or posterior osteotomy on thoracic spinal column rotation. Thoracolumbar spines were obtained from cadavers and segmented into upper, middle, and lower specimens. Specimens were cyclically loaded with a ±5 N·m moment in axial rotation for 10 cycles. Specimens were tested intact and then retested after sectioning or removal of each structure to simulate those removed during anterior release and posterior osteotomy. The total increases in axial rotation after posterior and anterior resections were calculated using a 3-dimensional motion capture camera system. For each ligament resection, the absolute and percent change in degrees of rotation was calculated from comparison with the intact specimen. The median data points were compared to account for outliers. Resection of anterior structures was more efficacious than resection of posterior structures. An 8.8% to 71.9% increase in the amount of axial rotation was achieved by a posterior release, whereas resection of anterior structures led to a 141% to 288% increase in rotation. The differences between the anterior and posterior resections at all levels tested (T2-T3, T6-T7, and T10-T11) were significant (P < 0.05). Anterior release generated significantly more thoracic rotation than posterior osteotomy in biomechanical testing of human cadaver spines. N/A.

Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study

BackgroundSegmental fixation improves fusion rates and promotes patient mobility by controlling instability after lumbar surgery. Efforts to obtain stability using less invasive techniques have lead to the advent of new implants and constructs. A new interspinous fixation device (ISD) has been introduced as a minimally invasive method of stabilizing two adjacent interspinous processes by augmenting an interbody cage in transforaminal interbody fusion. The ISD is intended to replace the standard pedicle screw instrumentation used for posterior fixation. PurposeThe purpose of this study is to compare the rigidity of these implant systems when supplementing an interbody cage as used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Study designAn in vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study. MethodsSeven human cadaver spines (T12 to the sacrum) were mounted in a custom-designed testing apparatus, for biomechanical testing using a multiaxial robotic system. A comparison of segmental stiffness was carried out among five conditions: intact spine control; interbody spacer (IBS), alone; interbody cage with ISD; IBS, ISD, and unilateral pedicle screws (unilat); and IBS, with bilateral pedicle screws (bilat). An industrial robot (KUKA, GmbH, Augsburg, Germany) applied a pure moment (±5 Nm) in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) through an anchor to the T12 vertebral body. The relative vertebral motion was captured using an optoelectronic camera system (Optotrak; Northern Digital, Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada). The load sensor and the camera were synchronized. Maximum rotation was measured at each level and compared with the intact control. Implant constructs were compared with the control and with each other. A statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance. ResultsA comparison between the intact spine and the IBS group showed no significant difference in the range of motion (ROM) in FE, LB, or AR for the operated level, L3–L4. After implantation of the ISD to augment the IBS, there was a significant decrease in the ROM of 74% in FE (p<.001) but no significant change in the ROM in LB and AR. The unilat construct significantly reduced the ROM by 77% compared with FE control (p<.001) and by 55% (p=.002) and 42% (p=.04) in LB and AR, respectively, compared with control. The bilat construct reduced the ROM in FE by 77% (p<.001), LB by 77% (p=.001), and AR by 65% (p=.001) when compared with the control spine. There was no statistically significant difference in the ROM in FE among the stand-alone ISD, unilat, and bilat constructs. However, in both LB and AR, the unilat and the bilat constructs were significantly stiffer (reduction in the ROM) than the ISD and the IBS combination. The ISD stability in LB and AR was not different from the intact control with no instrumentation at all. There was no statistical difference between the stability of the unilat and the bilat constructs in any direction. However, LB and AR in the unilat group produced a mean rotation of 3.83°±3.30° and 2.33°±1.33°, respectively, compared with the bilat construct that limited motion to 1.96°±1.46° and 1.39°±0.73°. There was a trend suggesting that the bilat construct was the most rigid construct. ConclusionsIn FE, the ISD can provide lumbar stability comparable with Bilat instrumentation. It provides minimal rigidity in LB and AR when used alone to stabilize the segment after an IBS placement. The unilat and the more typical bilat screw constructs were shown to provide similar levels of stability in all directions after an IBS placement, though the bilat construct showed a trend toward improved stiffness overall.

A Biomechanical Finite Element Study of Subsidence and Migration Tendencies in Stand-Alone Fusion Procedures – Comparison of an In Situ Expandable Device with a Rigid Device

Study Design: Biomechanical study using a finite element model of the lumbar functional spinal unit (FSU). Objectives: To compare the biomechanics of a novel in situ expandable posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) device, with a traditional rigid cage used in a stand-alone fashion. Methods: An experimentally validated intact finite element (FE) model of the L4-L5 FSU was altered to model expandable VariLift-L and BAK devices in a stand-alone fashion. A follower compressive pre-load of 400 N plus 8.0 Nm of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments were applied to the model to simulate the physiological loadings. The kinematics and load sharing among various models were compared. Results: Range of motion analyses showed that fusion utilizing VariLift-L expandable stand-alone device was more effective in limiting motion of the spinal column than the BAK device. The normal load at the device/endplate interface for the VariLift-L was similar to that of the BAK in all loading modes. The A-P shear load for the stand-alone VariLift-L model was higher than the BAK model under flexion. Conclusions: Due to predicted forces along the A-P direction, axial contact loads in flexion and extension, the lordotic slope of the device and the presence of intact annulus in the anterior region of the disc, the tendency of the VariLift-L device to migrate into the canal and subside into the endplate may be lower, despite the higher A-P shear force predicted for the VariLift-L device. This shape and lordotic expandability act to resist A-P shear forces in the flexion mode. The expandable device has the advantage of adjusting its outer profile to the lordotic angle of the treated segment, ensuring a better contact between the device and endplates. Biomechanically, the VariLift-L interbody fusion device is a good solution for fusion surgery of the lumbar spine segment.

Axial Rotation Moment Arms of the Shoulder Musculature After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty changes the lines of action of the shoulder muscles, resulting in increases in the moment arms of the major abductors and flexors of the glenohumeral joint; however, at present little is known about the axial rotation capacity of the musculature after this procedure. The purpose of this study was to measure the instantaneous axial rotation moment arms of all of the major muscles spanning the glenohumeral joint during abduction and flexion after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed on eight entire cadaveric upper extremities. Specimens were mounted onto a testing apparatus, and the internal/external rotation moment arms of eighteen major muscle subregions involving the subscapularis, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, teres major, deltoid, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi were measured during abduction and flexion. These muscle moment arms were compared with those measured preoperatively in the anatomical shoulders (i.e., before the arthroplasty). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty resulted in loss of external rotation function in the posterior deltoid subregion. Postoperatively, the inferior subscapularis subregion had the largest internal rotation moment arm overall, whereas the teres minor and the inferior infraspinatus subregion had the greatest external rotation moment arms. The teres minor, infraspinatus, and deltoid subregions were external rotators during abduction, whereas only the teres minor, infraspinatus, and to a small extent the posterior deltoid subregion were external rotators during flexion. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty results in an overall decrease in the external rotation moment arm of the deltoid and increases in the moment arms of the major internal rotators, including the latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may result in complete loss of external rotation function if the teres minor and infraspinatus muscles are damaged.

Knee moments during run-to-cut maneuvers are associated with lateral trunk positioning

Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries account for approximately 70% of ACL ruptures and often occur during a sudden change in direction or pivot. Decreased neuromuscular control of the trunk in a controlled perturbation task has previously been associated with ACL injury incidence, while knee abduction moments and tibial internal rotation moments have been associated with ACL strain and ACL injury incidence. In this study, the association between movement of the trunk during a run-to-cut maneuver and loading of the knee during the same activity was investigated. External knee moments and trunk angles were quantified during a run-to-cut maneuver for 29 individuals. The trunk angles examined were outside tilt (frontal plane angle of the torso from vertical), angle between the ground reaction force (GRF) and the torso in the plane containing the GRF and shoulders (torso-GRF_shoulders); and angle between GRF and torso in the plane containing the GRF and pelvis (torso-GRF_pelvis). Significant positive associations were found between torso angles and peak knee abduction moments (outside tilt, p=0.002; and torso-GRF_shoulders, p=0.036) while a significant negative association was found between peak tibial internal rotation moment and outside tilt (p=0.021). Because the peaks of these moments occur at different times and minimal axial rotation moment is observed at peak knee abduction moment (-0.29±0.46%BW*ht), the positive association between peak knee abduction moment and torso lean suggests that increasing torso lean may increase ACL load and risk of injury.