Awake Tracheal Intubation Research Articles

Sedation for awake tracheal intubation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Different sedation regimens have been used to facilitate awake tracheal intubation, but the evidence has not been synthesised robustly, particularly with respect to clinically important outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the sedation techniques most likely to be associated with successful tracheal intubation, a shorter time to successful intubation and a lower risk of arterial oxygen desaturation. We searched for randomised controlled trials of patients undergoing awake tracheal intubation for any indication and reporting: overall tracheal intubation success rate; tracheal intubation time; incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation; and other related outcomes. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis for these outcomes if two or more sedation regimens were compared between included trials. We also performed a sensitivity analysis excluding trials with a high risk of bias. In total, 48 studies with 2837 patients comparing 33 different regimens were included. Comparing overall awake tracheal intubation success rates (38 studies, 2139 patients), there was no evidence suggesting that any individual sedation regimen was superior. Comparing times to successful tracheal intubation (1745 patients, 24 studies), any sedation strategy was superior to placebo. When we excluded trials with a high risk of bias, we found no evidence of a difference between any interventions for time to successful tracheal intubation. Thirty-one studies (1753 patients) suggested that dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate were associated with a reduced risk of arterial oxygen desaturation compared with other interventions, but excluding trials with a high risk of bias suggested no relevant differences between interventions. The quality of evidence for each of our outcomes was low. To maximise effective and safe awake tracheal intubation, optimising oxygenation, topical airway anaesthesia and procedural performance may have more impact than any given sedation regimen.

Successful emergency management of hemorrhagic shock due to carotid artery aneurysm: the role of awake intubation in difficult airway control

We describe the clinical scenario, analyze the decision-making process in airway management, and application of the Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines for awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in a patient involving life-threatening bleeding from an internal carotid artery aneurysm caused by a fistula following radiotherapy for tongue cancer at Hong Ngoc Phuc Truong Minh General Hospital, on March, 2024. A 53-year-old male, diagnosed with tongue cancer, underwent surgery. Days before admission, he experienced pain and bleeding from the right lateral neck due to an internal carotid artery aneurysm. An attempt at tracheal intubation for endovascular intervention at another hospital failed. Upon arrival at our emergency department, he exhibited massive neck hemorrhage, remained conscious, pale, with ongoing bleeding from a right neck fistula, and limited cervical motion due to irritation. A treatment strategy for permanent occlusion of the aneurysm was devised. Awake tracheal intubation using a fiberoptic scope via the nasal route was performed. The patient received light sedation with midazolam, and the airway was topicalized with 10% lidocaine spray over the mouth, tongue, and oropharyngeal mucosa. Continuous monitoring of heart rate, ECG, and oxygen saturation showed no decrease in oxygen levels, and the patient maintained spontaneous breathing throughout. Intensive treatment with crystalloid fluids and blood transfusion, along with right internal carotid embolization with a spring coil, effectively prevented massive hemorrhage. The patient was successfully extubated after three days in the ICU and discharged 15 days post-surgery without any neurological deficits. Keywords: Awake Tracheal Intubation; Difficult Airway Management; Fiberoptic Scope; Emergency Airway Management Citation: Ba NTT. Successful emergency management of hemorrhagic shock due to carotid artery aneurysm: the role of awake intubation in difficult airway control. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(5):955−959. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i5.2572 Received: January 03, 2024; Reviewed: May 05, 2024; Accepted: June 11, 2024

102 Development of an Awake Tracheal Intubation Pack: promoting safe practice of essential airway skills

102 Development of an Awake Tracheal Intubation Pack: promoting safe practice of essential airway skills

First-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate using a hyperangulated unchannelled videolaryngoscope vs. a channelled videolaryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult airway: a randomised controlled trial.

There is uncertainty about the optimal videolaryngoscope for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway. The use of channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopy has been reported, but there is a lack of evidence on which is the best option. We conducted a randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of the C-MAC D-Blade® vs. Airtraq® in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) scheduled for elective or emergency surgery under general anaesthesia with anticipated difficult airway who required awake tracheal intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. The primary endpoint was the first-attempt tracheal intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included the overall success rate; number of tracheal intubation attempts; Cormack and Lehane glottic view; level of difficulty (visual analogue score); patient discomfort (visual analogue score); and incidence of complications. Ninety patients (70/90 male (78%); mean (SD) age 65 (12) y) with anticipated difficult airways were randomly allocated to C-MAC D-Blade or Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. First-attempt successful tracheal intubation rate was higher in patients allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with those allocated to the Airtraq group (38/45 (84%) vs. 28/45 (62%), respectively; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients' tracheas that were intubated at the second and third attempt was 4/45 (9%) and 3/45 (7%) in those allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with 14/45 (31%) and 1/45 (2%) in those allocated to the Airtraq group (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in overall tracheal intubation success rate (C-MAC D-Blade group 45/45 (100%) vs. Airtraq group 43/45 (96%), p = 0.494). In patients with anticipated difficult airway, first-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate was higher with the C-MAC D-Blade compared with Airtraq laryngoscopy. No difference was found between the two videolaryngoscopes in overall tracheal intubation success rate.

Videolaryngoscopy versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for Awake Tracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: In recent years, videolaryngoscopy has increasingly been utilized as an alternative to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in awake intubation. Nonetheless, it remains uncertain whether videolaryngoscopy represents a viable substitute for fiberoptic bronchoscopy. We conducted this systematic review with a meta-analysis to compare videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy for awake intubation. Methods: We systematically searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy for awake intubation. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically queried through August 2023. Our primary outcome measure was the duration of intubation. Secondary outcomes encompassed the rate of successful intubation on the initial attempt, failed intubation, patient-reported satisfaction, and any complications or adverse events potentially stemming from the intubation procedure. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs was employed to evaluate all studies for evidence of bias. The GRADE approach was utilized to gauge the certainty of the evidence. Results: Eleven trials involving 873 patients were ultimately included in our review for data extraction. Meta-analysis demonstrated that videolaryngoscopy decreased the duration of intubation compared to fiberoptic bronchoscopy (SMD -1.9671 [95% CI: -2.7794 to -1.1548] p < 0.0001), a finding corroborated in subgroup analysis by the type of videolaryngoscope (SMD -2.5027 [95% CI: -4.8733 to -0.1322] p = 0.0385). Additionally, videolaryngoscopy marginally lowered the risk of experiencing a saturation below 90% during the procedure (RR -0.7040 [95% CI: -1.4038 to -0.0043] p = 0.0486). No statistically significant disparities were observed between the two techniques in terms of failed intubation, initial successful intubation attempt, or sore throat/hoarseness. With regard to patient-reported satisfaction, a pooled analysis was precluded due to the variability in evaluation methods employed across the trials to assess this outcome. Lastly, trial sequential analysis (TSA) conducted for intubation time (primary outcome) affirmed the conclusiveness of this evidence; TSA performed for secondary outcomes failed to yield conclusive evidence, indicating the necessity for further trials. Conclusions: Videolaryngoscopy for awake tracheal intubation diminishes intubation time and the risk of experiencing a saturation below 90% compared to fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society (DAS), Association of Anaesthetists (AoA), British Society of Orthopaedic Anaesthetists (BSOA), Intensive Care Society (ICS), Neuro Anaesthesia and Critical Care Society (NACCS), Faculty of Prehospital Care and Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM).

There are concerns that airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury may exacerbate an existing neurological deficit, cause a new spinal cord injury or be hazardous due to precautions to avoid neurological injury. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for practicing clinicians to support safe and effective airway management in this setting. An expert multidisciplinary, multi-society working party conducted a systematic review of contemporary literature (January 2012-June 2022), followed by a three-round Delphi process to produce guidelines to improve airway management for patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury. We included 67 articles in the systematic review, and successfully agreed 23 recommendations. Evidence supporting recommendations was generally modest, and only one moderate and two strong recommendations were made. Overall, recommendations highlight key principles and techniques for pre-oxygenation and facemask ventilation; supraglottic airway device use; tracheal intubation; adjuncts during tracheal intubation; cricoid force and external laryngeal manipulation; emergency front-of-neck airway access; awake tracheal intubation; and cervical spine immobilisation. We also signpost to recommendations on pre-hospital care, military settings and principles in human factors. It is hoped that the pragmatic approach to airway management made within these guidelines will improve the safety and efficacy of airway management in adult patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury.

Awake tracheal intubation in routine airway management: A retrospective analysis in a tertiary centre.

While awake tracheal intubation (ATI) is regarded as the gold standard for difficult airway management according to current guidelines, there seems to be a reluctance in its application. This retrospective cohort study, conducted at a German tertiary hospital over a 2-year period, aimed to demonstrate that integrating awake tracheal intubation using flexible bronchoscopy (ATI:FB) into routine airway management makes it a successful and safe approach. In 2019 and 2020, records from the data acquisition system (DAQ) and archived anesthesia records were screened to evaluate the specifics of ATI:FB procedures, focusing on overall success and safety. Analysis included complications, time required for ATI:FB, and potential influencing factors such as patient characteristics, indication, medical/operative specialty, sedation technique, route and experience of anesthesiologist. Logistic regression assessed the impact of various variables on occurrence of complications and linear regression, with log(time) as the dependent variable, evaluated median time required to perform ATI:FB. ATI:FB constituted 4.3 % (n = 1,911) of all airway management procedures, predominantly observed in dental, oral, and maxillofacial surgery (46.5 %) and otorhinolaryngology (38.4 %). The success rate for ATI:FB was notably high at 99.6 %, with only 5.4 % of cases experiencing complications, including technical issues, agitation, and visibility obstruction due to mucous secretion. Complication risk was influenced by the medical specialty and the experience of the anesthesiologist. A strong effect was observed in otorhinolaryngology (OR = 4.54, 95 % CI [1.64; 14.06]). The median time required for ATI:FB was 16 minutes (IQR: 11 to 23), with factors such as indication (p < 0.0001), experience of anesthesiologist (p < 0.0001), sedation technique (p = 0.0408), priority of the procedure (p = 0.0134), and medical/operative specialty (p < 0.0001) affecting the duration. The median time required for ATI:FB differed significantly based on the experience of the anesthesiologist (p < 0.0001). ATI:FB proves successful and safe, with low complications and manageable procedural time. Experience of the anesthesiologist is a modifiable factor enhancing safety, emphasizing the need for ATI:FB integration into routine airway management.

THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ADULTS AIRWAY DEVICES IN AWAKE TRACHEAL INTUBATION

Background: Although flexible bronchoscopes are often used for awake tracheal intubation, other airway instruments including videolaryngoscopes, direct laryngoscopes, and optical stylets are becoming more and more useful. Aims : This systematic review is to review the the effects for airway devices on patients with awake tracheal intubation. Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SCIENCE DIRECT, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done. Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 431 articles, whereas the results of our search on SCIENCE DIRECT brought up 289 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2014 yielded a total 23 articles for PubMed and 115 articles for SCIENCE DIRECT. In the end, we compiled a total of 6 papers, 5 of which came from PubMed and 1 of which came from SCIENCE DIRECT. We included six research that met the criteria. Conclusion: In summary, in the context of awake tracheal intubation, flexible bronchoscopes, optical stylets, and channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopes were clinically equivalent airway devices. The time to tracheal intubation was longest with flexible bronchoscopes and shortest with optical stylets.

Feasibility of ProVu™ Video Stylet for awake intubation of patients with severe obesity: A pilot observational study

BackgroundAirway management in the obese patient is known to be challenging as oxygenation may rapidly decrease after general anesthesia induction. Mask ventilation and tracheal intubation can be complicated due to obesity-related anatomical features. The reduced safe apnea time can put the patient at risk of severe and rapid desaturation. Recent guidelines recommend avoiding the suppression of spontaneous breathing in cases of predicted anatomically or physiologically difficult airway. Many different devices, such as video stylets and video laryngoscopes, have been proposed as alternatives to traditional gold standard flexible bronchoscope use for awake intubation. AimOur study reports the use of a new flexible ProVu™ Video Stylet (Flexicare Medical Ltd., Mountain Ash, UK) for awake intubations in 11 patients with severe obesity, who presented with at least one criterion for potentially difficult oxygenation (during ventilation and/or intubation attempts) after suppression of spontaneous breathing. MethodsIn total 11 consecutive patients with severe obesity and clinical indication for an awake tracheal intubation were enrolled over a 10-months period and intubated with the ProVu™ Video Stylet. ResultsAll 11 tracheal intubations were successfully performed. The procedures also highlighted potential limitations to consider while using the device in an awake intubation setting. ConclusionDespite the limitations of this small observational pilot study, our study showed that the ProVu™ Video Stylet may be a promising tool and a valid alternative for performing awake tracheal intubation in patients with severe obesity and predictors of difficult oxygenation. Future studies are needed to compare the performance of the ProVu™ Video Stylet with video laryngoscopy and flexible bronchoscopy, and to provide stronger evidence in favor or against the use of this new device. The possible availability of an alternative device, combined with the skill and confidence to use it, may provide the anesthesiologist an additional tool for managing awake intubation of at-risk airways, in accordance with recommendations from the most recent guidelines.

Pharmacological combination for awake tracheal intubation in patients with giant struma: A case report &amp;lrm;

Pharmacological combination for awake tracheal intubation in patients with giant struma: A case report &amp;lrm;

Modified anterior approach versus traditional posterior approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake endotracheal intubation: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial

Study objective This study was undertaken to compare the effect of the modified ultrasound-guided anterior superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) with the traditional ultrasound-guided posterior SLNB in providing intubation conditions during awake tracheal intubation (ATI) in patients without difficult airway. Design Randomized, assessor-blind. Registration number: ChiCTR2200058086. Setting West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. Patients 104 patients aged 18–65 years, of American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III, posted for elective general surgery with general endotracheal anesthesia. Interventions The patients were randomized into two groups (modified group, n = 52; traditional group, n = 52). Modified anterior SLNB or traditional posterior SLNB was performed under ultrasound guidance. Measurements The primary outcome was the proportion of acceptable intubation condition (AIC), which was analyzed in both per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) populations. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was −4.8%. Secondary outcomes included intubation success rate on the first attempt, hemodynamic parameters during ATI, time taken for airway anesthesia and intubation, recall of intubation, patient perception of comfort, and incidence and severity of postoperative complications. Main results In the PP population, the proportion of AIC in the modified group was 49/49 (100%) and that in the traditional group was 49/49 (100%), absolute difference 0, lower limit of 1-sided 95% CI, −0.3%. In the ITT population, the primary outcomes in the modified and traditional group were 52/52 (100%) and 51/52 (98.1%), respectively, with an absolute difference of 1.9% and a lower limit of 1-sided 95% CI of −1.2%. The non-inferiority of modified ultrasound-guided anterior SLNB was confirmed in both populations. Conclusions Among adults without difficult airways during videolaryngoscope-assisted ATI, the modified ultrasound-guided anterior SLNB, compared to the traditional posterior approach, showed a statistically non-inferior effect in terms of providing AIC.

Awake Tracheal Intubation Is Associated with Fewer Adverse Events in Critical Care Patients than Anaesthetised Tracheal Intubation.

Tracheal intubation in critical care is a high-risk procedure requiring significant expertise and airway strategy modification. We hypothesise that awake tracheal intubation is associated with a lower incidence of severe adverse events compared to standard tracheal intubation in critical care patients. Records were acquired for all tracheal intubations performed from 2020 to 2022 for critical care patients at a tertiary hospital. Each awake tracheal intubation case, using a videolaryngoscope with a hyperangulated blade (McGrath® MAC X-Blade), was propensity matched with two controls (1:2 ratio; standard intubation videolaryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) undergoing general anaesthesia). The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events, defined as a mean arterial pressure of <55 mmHg (hypotension), SpO2 < 80% (desaturation) after sufficient preoxygenation, or peri-interventional cardiac arrest. Of the 135 tracheal intubations included for analysis, 45 involved the use of an awake tracheal intubation. At least one adverse event occurred after tracheal intubation in 36/135 (27%) of patients, including awake 1/45 (2.2%; 1/1 hypotension), VL 10/45 (22%; 6/10 hypotension and 4/10 desaturation), and DL 25/45 (47%; 10/25 hypotension, 12/25 desaturation, and 3/25 cardiac arrest; p < 0.0001). In this retrospective observational study of intubation practices in critical care patients, awake tracheal intubation was associated with a lower incidence of severe adverse events than anaesthetised tracheal intubation.

Airway nerve blocks for awake tracheal intubation: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials and trial sequential analysis

Study objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the superiority of airway nerve blocks versus airway anesthesia without nerve blocks for awake tracheal intubation (ATI). DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SettingAll studies that assessed the superiority of airway anesthesia technique for awake tracheal intubation were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Embase and Chinese databases (including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, and VIP databases) and trial registry databases from their inception to December 2022. PatientsAdult patients included in randomized controlled trials comparing airway anesthesia with or without airway nerve blocks for ATI. InterventionsAirway nerve (including superior laryngeal nerve, glossopharyngeal nerve, or recurrent laryngeal nerve) blocks for ATI. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the intubation time. Secondary outcomes were quality of intubating conditions (including patient reaction to placement of the flexible scope and tracheal tube, coughing and gagging, and patient satisfaction) and overall complications during ATI. Main resultsFourteen articles with 658 patients were identified for analysis. When compared with airway anesthesia without nerve blocks, airway nerve blocks significantly reduced intubation time (standardized mean difference [SMD] -2.57, 95% CI -3.59- -1.56, p < 0.00001), improved anesthesia quality of ATI with higher no reaction to placement of the flexible scope and tracheal tube (relative risk [RR] 9.87; 95% CI 4.10–23.75, p < 0.00001), lower cough or gag reflex during intubation (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.27–0.46, p < 0.00001), higher excellent patient satisfaction rate (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.05–3.34, p = 0.03), and lower overall complications (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19–0.45, p < 0.00001). The overall quality of evidence was moderate. ConclusionsBased on current published evidence, airway nerve blocks provide better airway anesthesia quality for ATI with a shorter intubation time, better intubation conditions including higher no reaction to placement of the flexible scope and tracheal tube, lower cough or gag reflex during intubation, higher excellent patient satisfaction, and lower overall complications.

A quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during awake tracheal intubation.

Aerosol-generating procedures are medical interventions considered high risk for transmission of airborne pathogens. Tracheal intubation of anaesthetised patients is not high risk for aerosol generation; however, patients often perform respiratory manoeuvres during awake tracheal intubation which may generate aerosol. To assess the risk, we undertook aerosol monitoring during a series of awake tracheal intubations and nasendoscopies in healthy participants. Sampling was undertaken within an ultraclean operating theatre. Procedures were performed and received by 12 anaesthetic trainees. The upper airway was topically anaesthetised with lidocaine and participants were not sedated. An optical particle sizer continuously sampled aerosol. Passage of the bronchoscope through the vocal cords generated similar peak median (IQR [range]) aerosol concentrations to coughing, 1020 (645-1245 [120-48,948]) vs. 1460 (390-2506 [40-12,280]) particles.l-1 respectively, p=0.266. Coughs evoked when lidocaine was sprayed on the vocal cords generated 91,700 (41,907-166,774 [390-557,817]) particles.l-1 which was significantly greater than volitional coughs(p < 0.001). For 38 nasendoscopies in 12 participants, the aerosol concentrations were relatively low, 180 (120-525 [0-9552]) particles.l-1 , however, five nasendoscopies generated peak aerosol concentrations greater than a volitional cough. Awake tracheal intubation and nasendoscopy can generate high concentrations of respiratory aerosol. Specific risks are associated with lidocaine spray of the larynx, instrumentation of the vocal cords, procedural coughing and deep breaths. Given the proximity of practitioners to patient-generated aerosol, airborne infection control precautions are appropriate when undertaking awake upper airway endoscopy (including awake tracheal intubation, nasendoscopy and bronchoscopy) if respirable pathogens cannot be confidently excluded.

The incidence of awake tracheal intubation in anesthetic practice is decreasing: a historical cohort study of the years 2014-2020 at a single tertiary care institution.

PurposeAwake tracheal intubation (ATI) is recommended in airway management guidelines when significant difficulty is predicted with airway management. Use of the technique may be declining, which may have implications for patient safety or for skills acquisition and maintenance. This historical cohort database study sought to determine if the use of ATI was decreasing in our adult tertiary care center.MethodsWith institutional research ethics board approval, we queried our anesthesia information management system for cases with ATI descriptors for each year from 2014 to 2020. Records of the retrieved cases were independently reviewed by all three authors to verify they met inclusion criteria for the ATI cohort prior to analysis for the primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included airway device and route used for ATI, first attempt and ultimate success rates, and reported adverse issues recorded in cases of failed ATI or those requiring more than one attempt.ResultsA total of 692 cases of ATI were identified between 2014 and 2020. There was a statistically significant decrease in yearly ATIs over the seven-year study period (Chi square goodness of fit, P < 0.001), with ATI use decreasing by about 50%. First attempt success was significantly greater with use of flexible bronchoscopy vs video laryngoscopy to facilitate ATI (84% vs 60%; P < 0.001), while there was no difference in first attempt success with the oral vs nasal route (82% vs 82%; P = 1.0).ConclusionIn this single-center historical cohort study, the use of ATI decreased significantly from 2014 to 2020. Whether this decrease will result in morbidity or mortality related to airway management is currently unclear. Regardless, it has implications for training opportunities and maintenance of competence in performing the procedure.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-022-02344-8.

Airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed traumatic spinal cord injury: a narrative review of current evidence.

SummaryAround 1 million people sustain a spinal cord injury each year, which can have significant psychosocial, physical and socio‐economic consequences for patients, their families and society. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians with a summary of recent studies of direct relevance to the airway management of patients with confirmed or suspected traumatic spinal cord injury to promote best clinical practice. All airway interventions are associated with some degree of movement of the cervical spine; in general, these are very small and whether these are clinically significant in terms of impingement of the spinal cord is unclear. Manual in‐line stabilisation does not effectively immobilise the cervical spine and increases the likelihood of difficult and failed tracheal intubation. There is no clear evidence of benefit of awake tracheal intubation techniques in terms of prevention of secondary spinal cord injury. Videolaryngoscopy appears to cause a similar degree of cervical spine displacement as flexible bronchoscope‐guided tracheal intubation and is an appropriate alternative approach. Direct laryngoscopy does cause a slightly greater degree of cervical spinal movement during tracheal intubation than videolaryngoscopy, but this does not appear to increase the risk of spinal cord compression. The risk of spinal cord injury during tracheal intubation appears to be minimal even in the presence of gross cervical spine instability. Depending on the clinical situation, practitioners should choose the tracheal intubation technique with which they are most proficient and that is most likely to minimise cervical spine movement.

Sedation versus General Anesthesia for Tracheal Intubation in Children with Difficult Airways: A Cohort Study from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry.

Sedated and awake tracheal intubation approaches are considered safest in adults with difficult airways, but little is known about the outcomes of sedated intubations in children. The primary aim of this study was to compare the first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation during sedated tracheal intubation versus tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. The hypothesis was that sedated intubation would be associated with a lower first-attempt success rate and more complications than general anesthesia. This study used data from an international observational registry, the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry, which prospectively collects data about tracheal intubation in children with difficult airways. The use of sedation versus general anesthesia for tracheal intubation were compared. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success of tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included the number of intubation attempts and nonsevere and severe complications. Propensity score matching was used with a matching ratio up to 1:15 to reduce bias due to measured confounders. Between 2017 and 2020, 34 hospitals submitted 1,839 anticipated difficult airway cases that met inclusion criteria for the study. Of these, 75 patients received sedation, and 1,764 patients received general anesthesia. Propensity score matching resulted in 58 patients in the sedation group and 522 patients in the general anesthesia group. The rate of first-attempt success of tracheal intubation was 28 of 58 (48.3%) in the sedation group and 250 of 522 (47.9%) in the general anesthesia group (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.87; P = 0.846). The median number of intubations attempts was 2 (interquartile range, 1 to 3) in the sedation group and 2 (interquartile range, 1, 2) in the general anesthesia group. The general anesthesia group had 6 of 522 (1.1%) intubation failures versus 0 of 58 in the sedation group. However, 16 of 58 (27.6%) sedation cases had to be converted to general anesthesia for successful tracheal intubation. Complications were similar between the groups, and the rate of severe complications was low. Sedation and general anesthesia had a similar rate of first-attempt success of tracheal intubation in children with difficult airways; however, 27.6% of the sedation cases needed to be converted to general anesthesia to complete tracheal intubation. Complications overall were similar between the groups, and the rate of severe complications was low.

A propensity score-adjusted analysis of efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen during awake tracheal intubation

Oxygen supplementation is crucial for awake tracheal intubation (ATI) using a flexible bronchoscope in patients with an anticipated difficult airway. However, the modality of optimal oxygen delivery remains unclear. This retrospective study compared high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and conventional low-flow oxygen supply during ATI. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for biases due to clinical characteristic differences between the groups. The primary endpoint was the lowest oxygen saturation during ATI. The secondary endpoints were incidence of desaturation, multiple attempts, failure rate, and procedural duration. After IPTW adjustment, the lowest oxygen saturation in the HFNO group during ATI was significantly higher than that in the conventional oxygenation group (99.3 ± 0.2 vs. 97.5 ± 0.5, P < 0.001). Moreover, the HFNO group had fewer cases with multiple attempts than the conventional oxygenation group (3% vs. 16%, P = 0.007). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of desaturation, failure and procedural duration. Our findings suggest that HFNO was associated with improved lowest oxygen saturation and a lower rate of multiple attempts during ATI. Therefore, we recommend using HFNO for safer oxygen delivery and improved quality of procedure during ATI.

A spray-as-you-go airway topical anesthesia attenuates cardiovascular responses for double-lumen tube tracheal intubation

BackgroundSpray-as-you-go (SAYGo) airway topical anesthesia and nerve block are common techniques used during awake tracheal intubation. However, their effects have not been described during double-lumen tube intubation. We report on a prospective randomized study that aimed to compare the intubation effects of SAYGo and nerve block patients undergoing thoracic surgery.MethodsSixty-six American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II patients were scheduled to undergo double-lumen tube (DLT) tracheal intubation for thoracic surgery. The patients were randomly assigned into control (Group C), ultrasound (Group U), and flexible intubation scope (Group F) groups with 22 cases in each group. Patients in Group C were induced with a standard anesthetic regimen. Patients in Groups U and F were treated with superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block combined with transtracheal injection (TTI) and given a SAYGo airway topical anesthesia before intubation. Hemodynamic variables during intubation process were recorded as the primary outcome. Additional patient data were recorded including the occurrence of adverse events, the level of hoarseness, the occurrence of sore throats, memory function and the level of patient satisfaction with anesthesia.ResultsThe blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) of patients in group C was significantly increased 1 min after tracheal intubation (P < 0.05) compared to before anesthesia. The BP and HR of patients in Groups U and F remained stable. 10 cases of hypertension were observed in Group C, 6 cases in Group U and 1 case in Group F. In Group C, tachycardia was observed in 9 patients along with 9 cases in Group U and 4 cases in Group F. In Group U, 4 patients experienced puncture and bleeding were and 8 patients had a poor memory of TTI. No significant differences were found in the incidence of hoarseness, sore throats, and satisfaction with anesthesia in postoperative follow-up.ConclusionsSAYGo airway topical anesthesia and SLN block combined with the TTI technique can inhibit the cardiovascular response during DLT tracheal intubation. The SAYGo technique has fewer complications and more advantages compared to other approaches.

AB199. SOH22ABS091. Awake tracheal Intubation among anaesthesiology trainees—a survey

Background: The Difficult Airway Society have published guidelines for the performance of awake tracheal intubation (ATI). This is a core competency among anaesthesiologists. We have surveyed Irish anaesthesiologists regarding their personal experience of performing ATI, including number of ATI done, confidence in the skill and experience of training of the skill.