Average Word Recognition Scores Research Articles

Reading comprehension skill in English as a second language of Japanese middle school students with cochlear implants

Objectives To assess the English reading comprehension skill of Japanese middle school students with cochlear implants (CIs). Materials and Methods The subjects were pre- or perilingually deafened CI recipients between seventh and ninth grades (age 12–15 years). English reading comprehension skill was evaluated using the Norm Referenced Test developed for Japanese students. Furthermore, factors related to English reading comprehension were assessed, focusing on a total of 11 variables: age; sex; age at CI; length of CI use; aided pure-tone thresholds with CI; Japanese listening word recognition score; performance intelligence quotient (PIQ) score; verbal intelligence quotient (VIQ); grade; school type; and Japanese reading comprehension skill. Results A total of 40 subjects completed the test. Their average word recognition score was good, at 80.2%,and the average age at CI was late, at 4.4 years. The chi-square goodness of fit test showed the English reading comprehension skill level deviated toward lower achievement in the students with CIs compared with children with normal-hearing. VIQ and Japanese reading comprehension skill were correlated with English reading skill. On the other hand, there was no relationship between English reading skill and the factors of hearing level and CI experience.

Impact of Masks on Speech Recognition in Adult Patients with and without Hearing Loss

Introduction: The coronavirus 2019 pandemic has altered how modern healthcare is delivered to patients. Concerns have been raised that masks may hinder effective communication, particularly in patients with hearing loss. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of masks on speech recognition in adult patients with and without self-reported hearing loss in a clinical setting. Methods: Adult patients presenting to an otolaryngology clinic were recruited. A digital recording of 36 spondaic words was presented to each participant in a standard clinical exam room. Each word was recorded in 1 of 3 conditions: no mask, surgical mask, or N95 mask. Participants were instructed to repeat back the word. The word recognition score was determined by the percent correctly repeated. Results: A total of 45 participants were included in this study. Overall, the mean word recognition score was 87% without a mask, 78% with a surgical mask, and 61% with an N95 mask. Among the 23 subjects (51.1%) with self-reported hearing loss, the average word recognition score was 46% with an N95 mask compared to 79% in patients who reported normal hearing (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that masks significantly decrease word recognition, and this effect is exacerbated with N95 masks, particularly in patients with hearing loss. As masks are essential to allow for safe patient-physician interactions, it is imperative that clinicians are aware they may create a barrier to effective communication.

Esteem 2 Middle Ear Implant: Our Experience

Introduction: The Esteem is a totally implantable hearing system that uses piezoelectric technology. It is indicated in case of moderate to severe stable sensorineural hearing loss with a minimum discrimination score of 60% and a middle ear which is anatomically and functionally intact. Its two components (sensor and driver) are positioned and fixed in the mastoid cavity and coupled respectively to the incus body and capitulum with cement. Study Design: Retrospective study. Settings: Tertiary referral center. Materials and Methods: Pure-tone average (PTA) gain in the implanted ear was calculated at 1, 2, and 4 KHz, word recognition score (WRS) gain at 50 dB SPL, and average WRS (AWRS) gain at 40, 55, and 70 dB SPL. WRS was also evaluated in silence and noise. All patients were asked to fill in the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) questionnaire pre- and postoperatively as well as an Esteem questionnaire. Results: Thirteen patients received implants between May 2008 and April 2010. Five minor complications occurred (1 temporary partial facial palsy, 1 secondary healing difficulty, and 3 revision surgeries for poor and deteriorating functional results and progressive gain loss after use of a heart defibrillator). Two patients (15%) suffered major complications and their implants had to be removed 4 months postoperatively because of a Staphylococcus aureus wound infection. One patient underwent reimplantation 6 months later. Mean PTA gain was 25 ± 11 dB, mean WRS gain at 50 dB SPL was 64 ± 33%, and mean AWRS gain was 40 ± 20%. WRS in silence and with a signal-noise ratio of 10, 0, and –5 dB was 91 ± 11, 85 ± 14, 71 ± 19, and 64 ± 30%, respectively. The APHAB questionnaire revealed 84% of satisfaction improvement compared to the previous classic hearing aid. Conclusion: The totally implantable hearing device Esteem 2 can offer good functional and satisfaction results. Careful selection of patients is required, however, based on hearing tests, exclusion of middle ear ventilation problems, and CAT-scan middle ear anatomy. Specific surgical training and experience are also needed. The implant is safe and only associated with classic auditory implant complications.

Patient selection for incus body coupling of a totally implantable middle ear implant

Objective—To evaluate audiologic selection criteria for incus body coupling (IBC) of a totally implantable middle ear implant (TI-MEI) for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).Material and Methods—The protocol is specified in the Investigational Device Exemption of a Food and Drug Administration-approved multicenter clinical trial. The prospective study compared pre- and postoperative hearing levels using each patient as their own control. In addition, an implant on/off comparison was made. All patients had a follow-up interval of at least 6 months. Audiologic assessment tests included speech discrimination in quiet as the primary efficacy variable and pure-tone audiometry (aided thresholds), gain, speech recognition in noise and subject satisfaction using standardized questionnaires and visual analog scales (VASs) as secondary efficacy variables. The study group of patients (n = 13) was divided into 3 subgroups based on their pure-tone and speech discrimination scores: Group A consisted of 6 patients, Group B 9 patients and Group C of all 13 patients. All patients suffered from long-standing bilateral moderate to severe SNHL. Five patients were dissatisfied hearing aid (HA) users and eight subjects could not wear HAs. All patients were implanted with a TI-MEI which was coupled to the incus body. The amplification level of the device was set postoperatively using inductive digital fitting based on "most comfortable loudness" specifications.Results—The implant produced median improvements from 30% (optimally fit bilateral HAs; n = 5) and 50% (HA non-users; n = 8) to 70% word recognition at 60 dB SPL. Average word recognition scores at 60, 80 and 90 dB SPL in Groups A and B showed increases from 42% (interquartile range +27%, -12%) to 93.5% (+3%, -5%) and 92.5% (+3%, -7%), respectively. In the presence of background noise, the sentence recognition threshold ranged from -2 to 1 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Maximum amplification was 50 dB at 3 kHz and 55 dB at 4 kHz. In Groups A and B, VASs revealed improvements in both natural sound impression and clarity from 62-70% of a natural sound impression to maximum scores of 100%. Using the standardized Gothenburg profile, subjective evaluations of hearing, orientation, social behavior and self-confidence reached 96-98%, 92-96% and 84-92% of the maximum score for Groups A-C, respectively.Conclusions—In selected cases, IBC of the TI-MEI investigated herein may be indicated for the treatment of SNHL, provided the following four conditions are met. First, the patient does not derive sufficient benefit from conventional HAs. Second, the specific indication for IBC is restricted to situations that do not allow the coupling of the MEI to the long incus process (e.g. due to an anatomical variation of facial nerve location). Third, IBC is restricted to patients with a steeply sloped moderate to severe high frequency SNHL, amounting to 90 dB HL from 3 to 8 kHz. Patients with low frequency SNHL should not be operated on with the IBC technique, as maximum low frequency hearing loss at 0.5 kHz must not exceed 30 dB. Fourth, Schueller's X-ray should reveal normal mastoid pneumatization. Being restricted to a 6-month follow-up period, this paper provides early clinical results and no clinical evidence of long-term efficiency of the implant.

Preferred listening levels: the effect of background noise for moderate-to-profoundly hearing impaired aid users.

The effects of background noise on the choice of preferred listening level for moderately-to-profoundly hearing impaired adults were investigated. During three listening conditions: 'quiet' (isolated monosyllables), 'suppress' (speech with noise attenuated in the gaps between words), and 'steady' (speech with continuous noise), subjects chose a level that maximized intelligibility without being uncomfortable while listening through a hearing aid. The group mean preferred level for 'suppress' was significantly higher than for 'steady', indicating that the level of noise between words influenced these subjects' choice of listening level. Average word recognition scores were higher in 'suppress' than in 'steady', but the difference was not statistically significant. Subjective loudness and quality ratings indicated no reduction in comfort or quality at the higher level for 'suppress'. The results suggest that a hearing aid that attenuated the level of background noise between words, or temporarily increased the gain during each word, would enable some listeners to tolerate higher levels of speech, thereby improving audibility and possibly speech perception while maintaining listening comfort.