Average Number Of Tablets Research Articles

A randomized trial of standard vs restricted opioid prescribing following midurethral sling

Postoperative opioid prescribing has historically lacked information crucial to balancing the pain control needs of the individual patient with our professional responsibility to judiciously prescribe these high-risk medications. This study aimed to evaluate pain control, satisfaction with pain control, and opioid use among patients undergoing isolated midurethral sling randomized to 1 of 2 different opioid-prescribing regimens. Patients who underwent isolated midurethral sling placement from June 1, 2020, to November 22, 2021, were offered enrollment into this prospective, randomized, open-label, noninferiority clinical trial. Participants were randomized to receive either a standard prescription of ten 5-mg oxycodone tablets provided preoperatively (standard) or an opioid prescription provided only during patient request postoperatively (restricted). Preoperatively, all participants completed baseline demographic and pain surveys, including the 9-Question Central Sensitization Index, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Likert pain score (scale 0-10). The participants completed daily surveys for 1 week after surgery to determine the average daily pain score, number of opioids used, other forms of pain management, satisfaction with pain control, perception of the number of opioids prescribed, and need to return to care for pain management. The online Prescription Drug Monitoring Program was used to determine opioid filling in the postoperative period. The primary outcome was average postoperative day 1 pain score, and an a priori determined margin of noninferiority was set at 2 points. Overall, 82 patients underwent isolated midurethral sling placement and met the inclusion criteria: 40 were randomized to the standard arm, and 42 were randomized to the restricted group. Concerning the primary outcome of average postoperative day 1 pain score, the restricted arm (mean pain score, 3.9±2.4) was noninferior to the standard arm (mean pain score, 3.7±2.7; difference in means, 0.23; 95% confidence interval,-∞ to 1.34). Of note, 23 participants (57.5%) in the standard arm vs 8 participants (19.0%) in the restricted arm filled an opioid prescription (P<.001). Moreover, 18 of 82 participants (22.0%) used opioids during the 7-day postoperative period, with 10 (25.0%) in the standard arm and 8 (19.0%) in the restricted arm using opioids (P=.52). Of participants using opioids, the average number of tablets used was 3.4±2.3, and only 3 participants used ≥5 tablets. On a scale of 1="prescribed far more opioids than needed" to 5="prescribed far less opioids than needed," the means were 1.9±1.0 in the standard arm and 2.7±1.0 in the restricted arm (P<.001). Restricted opioid prescription was noninferior to standard opioid prescription in the setting of pain control and satisfaction with pain control after isolated midurethral placement. Participants in the restricted arm filled fewer opioid prescriptions than participants in the standard arm. On average, only 3.4 tablets were used by those that filled prescriptions in both groups. Restrictive opioid-prescribing practices may reduce unused opioids in the community while achieving similar pain control.

Addressing the Opioid Epidemic: Impact of Opioid Prescribing Protocol at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry.

Prescription opioid medications continue to be abused on an epidemic level and have been shown to be a "gateway" drug to heroin abuse. Individuals experimenting with opioids commonly fall in the 10- to 19-year age range in which dentists are the highest prescribers. To reduce the number of excess opioids, the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Minnesota, developed and implemented an evidence-based opioid prescribing policy. Data were collected via electronic health record for the previous year and compared with the year following the protocol implementation. The results showed a drastic decrease (>46%) in the number of prescriptions given over a 1-year period. All departments reported a decrease in opioid prescriptions and the average number of tablets per prescription. The concern of undertreating pain was not found to be significant, as there was no increase in after-hours calls, recall appointments, or documentable emergency room visits. The results support the efficacy of an opioid prescribing policy's ability to lower the frequency and number of opioids given to patients, while still adequately treating patients' pain. Continued evaluation and modifications of the protocol and close monitoring of prescriber habits will enhance patients' pain control while also limiting the number of opioids available for abuse.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in patients with chronic kidney disease

AimsNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the cornerstone of pain management. There are no detailed data on NSAIDs use in Poland, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, circumstances, and causes of NSAIDs use as well as knowledge of their side-effects in patients with CKD.MethodThis cross-sectional study was conducted in 972 individuals with CKD, enrolled in a written survey originally developed by the authors. There were 574 patients with CKD stage I-IV, 414 patients after renal transplantation stage II-IV (CKDT) and 84 dialyzed patients (44 peritoneal, 40 hemodialysis).ResultsAmong the entire study group, 16.9 % of patients used NSAIDs every day, or several times a week. The average number of tablets taken within a month was 21.8. Subgroup analysis revealed that NSAIDs were taken most often by patients on hemodialysis: 35 % of them used NSAIDs every day or several times a week (43.15 pills per month). The most common reason for using NSAIDs were bone-joint pain (29.3 %) and headache (26.2 %). Side effects of painkillers such as renal function deterioration and the possible promotion of stomach ulcers were experienced by 43.6 and 37.6 % of respondents, respectively.ConclusionPatients with CKD often take NSAIDs. This applies especially to the group of people undergoing hemodialysis, which is mainly associated with chronic osteo-articular pain. The results also show a low awareness of painkillers’ adverse effects.

Drug Use Evaluation of Letrozole in Breast Cancer Patients at Regional Cancer Hospitals in Thailand

Medication policy development in Thailand is continually promoting rational drug use. Letrozole, an endocrine therapy drug, is usually prescribed for post-menopausal status early and advanced stage breast cancer. After Ministry of Public Health announced Letrozole as compulsory licensed drug in 2009, more breast cancer patients can access to this drug at low cost especially those within universal coverage schemes. To ensure that Letrozole is rationally prescribed, the drug utilization study was conducted. The aim of this study was to describe the appropriate use of Letrozole in breast cancer and the relationship between appropriate use and health benefit schemes. A retrospective study to evaluate use of Letrozole in breast cancer patients was performed for six months between January - June 2010 in seven regional cancer hospitals, Thailand. All prescriptions of Letrozole were identified from pharmacy dispensing databases and prescription papers. A medical record review was also performed to evaluate appropriate use referring to the drug use evaluation criteria. The approved criterion of this study was referred from the guideline of Thai National Formulary version 2010. There were 681 prescriptions of Letrozole for 254 breast cancer patients with an average age of 58.6 ± 10.0 years. The patients in universal coverage scheme (UCS), civil servant medication benefit scheme (CSMBS) and social security scheme (SSS) were 77.7%, 18.5% and 8.7% respectively. 10.6% were prescribed Letrozole for the first time. Letrozole were prescribed by oncologists (82.8%). The average number of tablets per prescription was 58 ± 10. Calcium supplements were prescribed concomitant with Letrozole for 19.4%. To assess drug use evaluation criteria, 45 prescriptions were excluded because of uncompleted clinical data, 636 prescriptions were evaluated. The study showed 86 prescriptions (13.5%) with inappropriate use including 6 (0.9%) not prescribed for estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, 31 (4.9%) not prescribed for post-menopausal and 49 (7.7%) not prescribed for an appropriate duration. Appropriate use percentages in different health benefit schemes were similar, 85.7% of CSMBS, 86.4% of SSS and 86.7% of UCS. The relationship between health benefit scheme and appropriate use of Letrozole was not significantly different, χ2 (2, N = 636) = 0.081, p > 0.05. The study showed inappropriate use in breast cancer patients because of non-compliance with duration, menopausal status and hormone receptor requirements. To prescribe appropriate indication did not referred to the appropriate practice along the treatment. Drug use evaluation proved very useful for detecting the sign of inappropriate use and allows immediate feedback to the stakeholder for developing medication policy in the future. Importantly, there was no significantly difference in appropriate use of Letrozole across health benefit schemes.

Determinants of Adherence to Delayed-Release Doxylamine and Pyridoxine in Patients With Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy

Women often hesitate to take medications in pregnancy due to fears of perceived potential fetal damage. The authors' objective is to identify the determinants of adherence to delayed-release doxylamine-pyridoxine (Diclectin) in patients with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP). The authors performed a prespecified secondary analysis of a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial of Diclectin versus placebo for the treatment of NVP. Data on adherence to study medication were collected in all patients. The primary outcome of this analysis was adherence to study medication, which was determined by pill counting and patient diaries. The treatment regimen in the original trial was not fixed and depended on patient's symptoms. There was no difference in the adherence rates between subjects in the Diclectin or placebo arms of the study, so the 2 arms were analyzed as one cohort. The degree of adherence was analyzed in the various subgroups. Subsequently, a multiple linear regression model was constructed to identify predictors to adherence. Two hundred fifty-eight women were included in this analysis. There were no differences in adherence rates according to ethnicity, race, or the presence of adverse events. Gravidity, average number of prescribed tablets per day, site of enrollment, and change in NVP severity measured by the pregnancy unique-quantification of emesis score were associated with adherence. In multivariable analysis, average number of tablets per day, change in pregnancy unique-quantification of emesis, number of treatment days, site of enrollment were significantly predictive of adherence, with the former being negatively correlated. Adherence to antinauseants for NVP is affected by number of tablets prescribed per day, and treatment duration and effectiveness.

PSS38 3-D Study - Description of the Care of the Dental Pain

Highlight the action of two analgesics combining paracetamol and codeine (Klipal 600® and EfferalganDafalgan Codeine®), with a minimum of 50 mg of codeine at a time. Multicentre, longitudinal, prospective, observational study, performed in metropolitan France from data collected by the dental surgeons that have accepted to participate in it. A total of 105 patients were included. Klipal 600® was prescribed for 76 of them versus 24 for the other group. 56.2% of the patients are women. The average age is 45.57 + 14.64. The measurement of the average pain intensity, evaluated each day over a 6 day period by a VAS, shows an insignificant difference at the inclusion between the 2 groups (p = 0.23). But, contrary to the Efferalgan/Dafalgan codeine® group, the score differential for the pain intensity is statistically significant between Day 1 and Day 2 with the Klipal 600® group and the improvement is significant up to the fourth day. The pain qualification was evaluated by the Saint Antoine pain questionnaire (abbreviated format) bearing on 16 sensory and emotional qualifiers specifying the description of the pain experienced. The difference is not significant between the 2 groups at the inclusion (p = 0.09), then it is observed that the pain qualification score is reduced beginning on the second day for the 2 groups. For the 2 groups, it is observed that the average number of tablets is in the order of 2.3 during the first 48 hours with a similar progressive decrease up to the sixth day. The prescription of one tablet at a time for the Klipal® is an advantage for the follow up of the treatment and its effectiveness. In reality, this study demonstrates a quicker improvement in pain in the Klipal® group, also associated with reduced consumption of the treatment and a better effectiveness.

On‐demand requirements of patients with endoscopy‐negative gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease: H2‐blocker vs. proton pump inhibitor

It is questionable whether a symptomatic condition with few serious medical consequences requires proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. If effective, a less-potent treatment may be preferable. To compare an H2-blocker in an effervescent formulation with a PPI in on-demand treatment of endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Included were patients with heartburn and/or acid regurgitation for at least 3 months duration, a negative endoscopy and a positive response to 7 days of lansoprazole 60 mg daily. Following pH-metry, the patients were randomized to receive either ranitidine effervescent tablets 75 mg or lansoprazole capsules 15 mg to a maximum of four per day on-demand. The numbers taken were registered monthly for 6 months. If treatment was unsuccessful (lack of efficacy or side effects), patients were registered as failures. One hundred and three patients were included and 63 were considered for statistical analysis; 32 on lansoprazole and 31 on ranitidine. Seventeen (55%) on ranitidine and four (13%) on lansoprazole failed. The average number of tablets per day was 1.2 in the lansoprazole group and 3.1 in the ranitidine group. On-demand treatment in patients with endoscopy-negative GERD gives a high success rate with a fairly low dose of PPI. The H2-blocker had significantly less success; nevertheless, almost half were satisfied with the treatment.

Emergence and Persistence of Macrolide Resistance in Oropharyngeal Flora and Elimination of Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus after Therapy with Slow-Release Clarithromycin: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

To investigate the effect of slow-release (SR) clarithromycin on colonization and the development of resistance in oropharyngeal and nasal flora, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed with 8 weeks of follow-up. A total of 296 patients with documented coronary artery disease were randomized in the preoperative outpatient clinic to receive a daily dose of SR clarithromycin (500 mg) (CL group) or placebo tablets (PB group) until the day of surgery. Nose and throat swabs were taken before the start of therapy, directly after the end of therapy, and 8 weeks later. The presence of potential pathogenic bacteria was determined, and if they were isolated, MIC testing was performed. Quantitative culture on media with and without macrolides was performed for the indigenous oropharyngeal flora. In addition, analysis of the mechanism of resistance was performed with the macrolide-resistant indigenous flora. Basic patient characteristics were comparable in the two treatment groups. The average number of tablets taken was 15 (standard deviation = 6.4). From the throat swabs, Haemophilus parainfluenzae was isolated and carriage was not affected in either of the treatment groups. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, however, was significantly reduced in the CL group (from 35.3 to 4.3%) compared to the PB group (from 32.4 to 30.3%) (P < 0.0001; relative risk [RR], 7.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1 to 16.0). Resistance to clarithromycin was present significantly more frequently in H. parainfluenzae in the CL group after treatment (P = 0.007; RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3); also, the percentage of patients with resistance to macrolides in the indigenous flora after treatment was significantly higher in the CL group (31 to 69%) (P < 0.0001; RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5). This persisted for at least 8 weeks. This study shows that besides the effective elimination of nasal carriage of S. aureus, treatment with SR clarithromycin for approximately 2 weeks has a marked and sustained effect on the development of resistance in the oropharyngeal flora for at least 8 weeks.

Effects of legislation restricting pack sizes of paracetamol and salicylate on self poisoning in the United Kingdom: before and after study

Objective: To evaluate the effects on suicidal behaviour of legislation limiting the size of packs of paracetamol and salicylates sold over the counter.Setting: UK population, with detailed monitoring of data...