Availability Of Clinical Practice Guidelines Research Articles

Transfemoral interface considerations: A clinical consensus practice guideline.

Although there have been a number of studies exploring the impact and efficacy of transfemoral prosthetic components such as knee and foot mechanisms, the empirical evidence surrounding transfemoral prosthetic interface considerations is limited. This constitutes a substantial void for practicing clinicians seeking to apply best practices for patients who use transfemoral prostheses. Recent years have seen increased production and availability of clinical practice guidelines germane to prosthetic rehabilitation. In those areas where empirical evidence is lacking, consensus clinical opinions may constitute the highest level of evidence. A consensus exercise was performed to generate clinical practice recommendations in the areas of transfemoral interface considerations including socket variations and critical design features, suspension and interface considerations, alignment, heat retention and dermatologic considerations, female considerations, surgical considerations, and both regulatory and ethical considerations related to osseointegration. This began with the generation of postulate items through systematic and narrative literature reviews. A Delphi consensus exercise was performed among clinical experts in government hospital and private clinical practice settings, culminating in a series of clinical practice recommendations associated with the prosthesis-limb interface for individuals with transfemoral amputation. The completed recommendations include guidance statements relative to socket variations and critical design features, female considerations, suspension and interface considerations, surgical variations and prescription considerations, rehabilitation team considerations and both regulatory and ethical considerations related to osseointegration. The Delphi process facilitated the development of practice guidelines for transfemoral prosthetic interface considerations based on aggregated subject matter expertise.

Impact Evaluation of An Interdisciplinary Educational Intervention to Health Professionals for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Child Malnutrition in Mexico: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

The prevalence of undernutrition in Mexican children younger than 5 years old has been 14% since 2006. There are clinical practice guidelines for mild to moderate malnutrition in children in the Mexican health system; however, they are not applied. In addition, the knowledge and practices of health professionals (HP) to treat malnutrition in health centers are insufficient to perform adequate assessments and correct treatments. An impact evaluation of an interdisciplinary educational intervention was carried out on 78 HPs for the treatment of children with mild to moderate malnutrition of low resources, with 39 in the intervention group and 37 in the counterfactual group, estimated as the comparison group. A Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)-validated questionnaire adapted to child malnutrition about knowledge, attitudes, and practices was applied before, after, and 2 months after a malnutrition workshop. The difference-in-differences analysis showed that the educational intervention group had a significant improvement in knowledge, attitudes, and practices before and after the intervention (grades of 54.6 to 79.2 respectively, p = 0.0001), compared with the comparison group (grades of 79.2 and 53.4, respectively, p = 0.0001), which was maintained over two months (grades of 71.8 versus 49.8, p = 0.0001, respectively). The multivariate analysis showed that the probability of improvement in learning by 30% was 95-fold higher in the educational intervention group versus the comparison group, OR = 95.1 (95% CI 14.9-603.0), and this factor was independent of sex, age, education, or hospital position. Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines for the assessment and treatment for child malnutrition, education in malnutrition for HPs is effective and needed to achieve a significant improvement in children's health.

Pediatric Residency Training amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Impact of Supervision and Clinical Practice Guidelines on Clinical and Financial Outcomes.

Objective This study is aimed at calculating the magnitude of the effect of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and supervision in inhibiting the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical and financial outcomes of non-COVID-19 inpatient care by pediatric residents in academic medical center (AMC) hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The cohort retrospective study was conducted. This study collected patient data from pediatric residency programs. A research cohort consisted of non-COVID-19 pediatric patients at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital. This study compared the subgroup of patients treated during the pandemic with those treated before the pandemic. The results were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and Smart-PLS. Results There was a 41.4% decrease in pediatric inpatients during the pandemic with an increased severity level and complexity level, a reduction of 7.46% availability of supervisors, an increase of 0.4% in readmission < 30 days, an increase of 0.31% in-hospital mortality, an increase the total costs of care, and a decrease of insurance claim profit. CPG did not moderate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical outcomes (β = −0.006, P = 0.083) but moderated the financial outcomes (β = −0.022, P = 0.000), by reducing the total cost of care and increasing insurance claim profit. Supervision moderated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical outcomes (β = 0.040, P = 0.000) by increasing aLOS and on the financial outcomes (β = −0.031, P = 0.000) by reducing the total cost of care and increasing insurance claim profit. This study model had a 24.0% variance of explanatory power for clinical outcomes and 49.0% for financial outcomes. This study's structural model effectively predicted clinical outcomes (Q2 = 0.238) and financial outcomes (Q2 = 0.413). Conclusion Direct supervision inhibited the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on both clinical and financial outcomes of non-COVID-19 inpatient care by pediatric residents, while CPG only inhibited the negative impact on financial outcomes. Implication of This Study. In a disaster, the availability of CPG and direct supervision makes AMC hospitals able to inhibit the negative impact of disasters on clinical and financial outcomes.

Integration of a multicomponent intervention for hypertension into primary healthcare services in Singapore-A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Despite availability of clinical practice guidelines for hypertension management, blood pressure (BP) control remains sub-optimal (<30%) even in high-income countries. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a potentially scalable multicomponent intervention integrated into primary care system compared to usual care on BP control. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 8 government clinics in Singapore. The trial enrolled 916 patients aged ≥40 years with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg). Multicomponent intervention consisted of physician training in risk-based treatment of hypertension, subsidized losartan-HCTZ single-pill combination (SPC) medications, nurse training in motivational conversations (MCs), and telephone follow-ups. Usual care (controls) comprised of routine care in the clinics, no MC or telephone follow-ups, and no subsidy on SPCs. The primary outcome was mean SBP at 24 months' post-baseline. Four clinics (447 patients) were randomized to intervention and 4 (469) to usual care. Patient enrolment commenced in January 2017, and follow-up was during December 2018 to September 2020. Analysis used intention-to-treat principles. The primary outcome was SBP at 24 months. BP at baseline, 12 and 24 months was modeled at the patient level in a likelihood-based, linear mixed model repeated measures analysis with treatment group, follow-up, treatment group × follow-up interaction as fixed effects, and random cluster (clinic) effects. A total of 766 (83.6%) patients completed 2-year follow-up. A total of 63 (14.1%) and 87 (18.6%) patients in intervention and in usual care, respectively, were lost to follow-up. At 24 months, the adjusted mean SBP was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to usual care (-3.3 mmHg; 95% CI: -6.34, -0.32; p = 0.03). The intervention led to higher BP control (odds ratio 1.51; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.09; p = 0.01), lower odds of high (>20%) 10-year cardiovascular risk score (OR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.97; p = 0.03), and lower mean log albuminuria (-0.22; 95% CI: -0.41, -0.02; p = 0.03). Mean DBP, mortality rates, and serious adverse events including hospitalizations were not different between groups. The main limitation was no masking in the trial. A multicomponent intervention consisting of physicians trained in risk-based treatment, subsidized SPC medications, nurse-delivered motivational conversation, and telephone follow-ups improved BP control and lowered cardiovascular risk. Wide-scale implementation of a multicomponent intervention such as the one in our trial is likely to reduce hypertension-related morbidity and mortality globally. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02972619.

Treatment for temporomandibular disorders in South Korea: A9-year trend using cluster analysis.

Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), research evidence on current clinical practice trends is scarce. This study aimed to analyse the TMD treatment trends and patterns according to patient characteristics in Korea over a 9-year period. The 2010-2018 Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service National Patient Sample data were used. A total of 109969 patients diagnosed with TMD as the principal diagnosis at least once in each year were included in the study. The types of visits and treatments were analysed by year. K-medoids clustering was then performed to analyse the treatment patterns according to patient characteristics. The most commonly used drugs for pharmacological treatment were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and relaxants. The prescription of opioids, anxiolytics and antidepressants was reduced. Among non-pharmacological treatments, physiotherapy was the most utilised, and its use increased over the years. Cluster analysis showed that treatment patterns generally differed between sexes; the rate of outpatient visits and the use of NSAIDs, relaxants and physiotherapy were higher among female patients. This study showed that TMD treatment prescriptions changed from 2010 to 2018 and found notable trends in NSAIDs, relaxants, opioids, anxiolytics, antidepressants and physiotherapy. Moreover, the treatment patterns differed between the sexes. These findings indicate that the prescriptions for TMD treatment changed over the years; these results may be useful in the development of future clinical guidelines and should be reflected in future guidelines.

Implementation strategies to address barriers to evidence-informed symptom management among outpatient oncology nurses: a scoping review protocol

IntroductionDespite the availability of clinical practice guidelines for cancer symptom management, cancer care providers do not consistently use them in practice. Oncology nurses in outpatient settings are well positioned to...

Treatment recommendations for the management of persistent pelvic pain: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines.

Females with persistent pelvic pain (PPP) report great variability in the treatments recommended to them despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that aim to standardise care. A clear consensus for the best practice care for PPP is required. To identify and summarise treatment recommendations across CPGs for the management of PPP, and appraise their quality. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, EmCare, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection and relevant guideline databases were searched from their inception to June 2021. Included CPGs were those for the management of urogynaecological conditions in adult females published in English, of any publication date, and endorsed by a professional organisation or society. We screened 1379 records and included 20 CPGs. CPG quality was assessed using The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool. Descriptive synthesis compiled treatment recommendations across CPGs. The CPGs for seven conditions provided 270 individual recommendations. On quality appraisal, guidelines on average scored 'excellent' for the domains 'scope and purpose' (80.6%, SD=13.3) and 'clarity and presentation' (74.4%, SD=12.0); for other domains, average scores were satisfactory or poor. Four guidelines (for Endometriosis: NICE, RANZCOG and ESHRE; for polycystic ovary syndrome: Teede et al. 2018, International Evidence Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia) were deemed recommended for use. Recommendations were most frequent for pharmaceutical and surgical interventions. Recommendations were variable for psychological, physiotherapy and other conservative interventions. The quality of CPGs for PPP is generally poor. Several CPGs endorse the consideration of biopsychosocial elements of PPP. Yet most recommend pharmaceutical, surgical and other biomedical interventions.

Clinical practice guidelines for management of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with noncardiac surgery: A critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.

Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), there are considerable differences in their recommendations in the perioperative management of stented patients who need elective noncardiac surgery. Our aim was to systematically review the quality of CPGs for perioperative management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and summarize the recommendations. A systematic search for perioperative DAPT guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Embase and websites of guideline organizations and professional societies until 4 February 2021. Independently, two assessors appraised the quality of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument and extracted the data. Recommendations were summarized, and a comparative study was conducted to analyse the consistency among guidelines. A total of 10guidelines fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The domain of scope and purpose and clarity of presentation obtained the highest median scores, while the domain of stakeholder involvement and rigour of development obtained the lowest median scores. Three guidelines (ACCP, ESC/ESA and ACC/AHA) with a score of at least 60% in most AGREE II domains were recommended. Recommendations across perioperative management of DAPT guidelines were inconsistent. The ACCP, ESC/ESA and ACC/AHA CPGs were recommended. There is a need for high-quality prospective studies assessing different management strategies on this issue. Given the lack of consensus, the results of this study will help to guide perioperative dual antiplatelet management strategies for patients with coronary stents who are undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Setting a benchmark for resource utilization and quality of care in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Europe-Rationale and design of the international BENCHMARK registry.

BackgroundThe use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for treating aortic stenosis (AS) has increased exponentially in recent years. Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease, disparities in quality of care (QoC) for TAVI patients remain widespread across Europe. Tailored QoC measures will help to reduce resource utilization and improve patient outcomes without compromising patient safety. Using a clear set of QoC measures, the BENCHMARK registry aims to document the progress that can be achieved if such tailored QoC measures are implemented.MethodsThe BENCHMARK registry (BENCHMARK) is a non‐interventional, multicenter registry in patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing TAVI with a 1‐ and 12‐months follow‐up. BENCHMARK will be conducted at 30 centers across Europe and will enroll a total of 2400 consecutive TAVI patients. Patients suffering from severe symptomatic AS who undergo TAVI with a balloon‐expandable transcatheter aortic valve will be included. The registry will comprise four phases: (1) a retrospective baseline evaluation phase; (2) an education phase; (3) an implementation phase; and (4) a prospective effect documentation phase (prospective phase). The registry's primary objectives are to reduce the length of hospital stay and accelerate the post‐procedural patient recovery pathway, but without compromising safety. The study started in April 2021 and has an estimated completion date of May 2023.DiscussionBENCHMARK will establish QoC measures to reduce resource utilization, intensive care unit bed occupancy, and overall length of hospitalization with uncompromised patient safety post‐TAVI (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04579445).

A clinical study of patients with acute pancreatitis in North Indian teaching hospital

Background: Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis, recent studies auditing the clinical management of the condition have shown important areas of noncompliance with evidence-based recommendations. This underscores the importance of creating understandable and implementable recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis is a significant health problem which leads to a quarter of million hospital admissions in USA per year. Aims and Objectives: To Study of Patients with Acute Pancreatitis in North Indian Teaching Hospital. Subjects and Methods: Acute pancreatitis can range from a mild, self-limiting disease that requires no more than supportive measures to severe disease with life-threatening complications. After approval from ethical institutional committee a cross-sectional study was carried out at the Department of Surgery in the patients diagnosed as Pancreatitis during one year period i.e. June 2016 to May 2017. During one year period there were 78 patients enrolled into the study. Al details of the patients like age, sex, clinical features, etiological features, Outcome like Improved, DAMA (Discharge against Medical Advise) and Death and associated factors were studied in details. The data was presented in percentages and presented in the tabular form.Result: Therefore present study is stating that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 40- 50 were 40.0%, followed by 30-40 were 31.25%, 50-60 were 11.25%, >60 were 10.0%, 20-30 were 7.5%. The majority of the patients were Female i.e. 62.50%, and Male were 37.50%. The most common clinical presentation was Pain in abdomen i.e. 90%, followed by Fever 83%, Vomitting-78%, Jaundice 62%, Septicemia Shock in 32%. The most common etiology fond was Biliary in 52.78%, Alcoholism in 19.44%, Hyperlipidemia in 16.67%, idiopathic in 6.94%, traumatic in 4.17%. 85% Patients Improved, 5% patients discharged by Discharge against medical advice (DAMA) and Death occurred in 10% of the individuals; these patients were associated with old age, co- morbid conditions like Diabetes, Heart disease, Obesity etc. Conclusion: It can be concluded from our study that the most common clinical presentation was Pain in abdomen, followed by Fever, Vomiting, Jaundice, Septicemic Shock. The most common etiology fond was Biliary followed by Alcoholism, Hyperlipidemia, Idiopathic Traumatic, etc. In outcome majority of the Patients Improved Death occurred in 10% of the individuals; these patients were associated with old age comorbid conditions like Diabetes, Heart disease, Obesity etc.

Changes in the availability of clinical practice guidelines for malnutrition: A 6-y multicenter study.

The aim of the study was to examine the availability of clinical practice guidelines for malnutrition in hospitals over a period of 6 y and the subsequent use of nutritional interventions in malnourished patients. This study was conducted as a secondary data analysis of data that were collected from 2012 to 2017 in a quantitative, cross-sectional, multicenter study called the National Prevalence Measurement Quality of Care (LPZ). Data from 15 hospitals and 5650 participating patients were analyzed. The availability of clinical practice guidelines for malnutrition at the institutions increased from 6.7% in 2012 to 100% in 2017 (P < 0.001). The control of compliance to the guidelines increased from 28.6% to 85.7% (P < 0.001) and the documentation of malnutrition risk improved from 63.1% to 87.5% (P = 0.008). In 2017, the intervention "referral to dietitian" was used 8.3% more often (P < 0.001). The number of patients who did not receive any intervention decreased from 70% in 2012 to 55.6% in 2017 (P < 0.001). The availability of guidelines on malnutrition increased in participating hospitals over the 6-y study period. Regular controls of adherence to the guidelines positively correlated with their availability. More interventions to treat malnutrition were carried out in 2017. The use of clinical practice guidelines in this study was associated with more interventions treating malnutrition.

Assessing the quality of health care in the management of bronchiolitis in Australian children: a population-based sample survey

BackgroundBronchiolitis is the most common cause of respiratory hospitalisation in children aged <2 years. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) suggest only supportive management of bronchiolitis. However, the availability of CPGs do...

Low Serum Trough Concentrations and High Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus From Hemodialysis Patients in Brazil.

The empiric antimicrobial therapy for bacteremia of long-term hemodialysis (HD) outpatients is currently based on the combination of vancomycin and gentamicin because of the high frequency of isolated Staphylococcus species. The vancomycin trough level range from 15 to 20 mcg/mL is expected for therapeutic success against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥1.0 mcg/mL. Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines for vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring, these target serum concentrations are not reached in many patients. In this study, the authors investigated the vancomycin trough levels in 20 HD patients with S. aureus bacteremia and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of 45 S. aureus strains isolated from 45 HD patients. The vancomycin serum concentration was determined by chemiluminescent assay. The MIC was determined by broth microdilution method. None of the HD patients included in this study had vancomycin trough concentrations within the therapeutic range. Also, the vancomycin MIC for most methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolated from bacteremia was ≥1.0 mcg/mL. The therapeutic range of vancomycin was not achieved, and vancomycin MIC was surprisingly high in methicillin-sensitive S. aureus.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Practice Patterns Reported by Neonatologists and Neonatal Nurse Practitioners in the United States.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is widely used to treat neonatal respiratory conditions. Significant evidence emerged in recent years to guide practice, yet current practice patterns and their alignment with the evidence remain unknown. To examine current HFNC practice patterns and availability of clinical practice guidelines used in neonatal intensive care units in the United States. A nonexperimental, descriptive study was designed using a web-based survey to elicit a convenience sample of US neonatal providers. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, χ tests were used to test for differences among the categories, and post hoc comparisons among each combination of categories were conducted using a Bonferroni-corrected α of .05 to determine significance as appropriate. A total of 947 responses were analyzed (626 neonatologists and 321 neonatal nurse practitioners). Univariate analyses suggested wide variations in practice patterns. One-third of the respondents used clinical guidelines, the majority utilized HFNC devices in conjunction with nasal continuous positive airway pressure, more than two-thirds used HFNC as a primary respiratory support treatment, and among all respondents, significant differences related to HFNC device types were reported. US providers revealed wide practice variations related to HFNC therapy. In addition, type of device used appears to impact practice patterns and approaches. Use of standardized guidelines was reported by one third of the respondents, and as such may be the contributing factor for wide practice variations. Future Research is needed to target aspects of practice where practice variations exist, or practice is not supported by evidence. Significant practice differences related to the device types should be considered in future research design.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines with the AGREE II instrument

BackgroundDespite the availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), the risk of death or thromboembolic complication associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains high. Our aim was to systematically review the quality of CPGs for HIT and summarize the recommendations. MethodsCPGs for HIT were systematically searched on PubMed, Embase, guidelines' websites, and Google up to August 6, 2017. Independently, three appraisers assessed the quality of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument and extracted the data. Recommendations were summarized, and a comparative study was conducted to analyze the consistency among guidelines. ResultsA total of 11 CPGs were evaluated. The quality assessed by AGREE II varied widely, not only between domains within guidelines, but also between guidelines across domains. The domain of scope and purpose and clarity of presentation obtained the highest median scores, while the domain of rigor of development and editorial independence obtained the lowest median scores. The ACCP guideline and BSH guideline were recommended for use in dealing with HIT, achieving a score of at least 50% in all six AGREE II domains. Recommendations across guidelines were inconsistent, especially in the choice of non-heparin anticoagulant for HIT. ConclusionsFuture HIT guidelines should place more emphasis on methodological quality and improve efforts to include cost and local availability of drugs when providing recommendations.

STANDING Collaboration: a study protocol for developing clinical standards

IntroductionDespite widespread availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), considerable gaps continue between the care that is recommended (‘appropriate care’) and the care provided. Problems with current CPGs are commonly cited...

BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO GUIDELINE USE IN DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY IN PARKINSON’S DISEASE OR DEMENTIA

Abstract Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression or anxiety in dementia or Parkinson’s disease (PD), these comorbidities remain under-diagnosed and under-treated. Our primary objective was to understand the barriers and facilitators associated with the implementation of high quality CPGs for depression and anxiety in patients with dementia or PD. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with participants experiencing PD, their caregivers and physicians involved in the care of persons with dementia or PD in Calgary, Alberta. The Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel were used to guide data collection and perform a framework analysis. Evidence from the available guidelines was compared to reported physician behaviours. A total of 33 physicians and 7 PD patients/caregivers participated. We were unable to recruit patients/caregivers with dementia. Data were divided into three categories based on the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of guideline recommendations for diagnosis, management and the use of the guidelines. An overarching theme was the lack of evidence for depression or anxiety disorders in dementia or PD. This was more prominent for anxiety versus depression. Other themes included the lack of consistency between guidelines, lack of clarity in the language used, lack of applicability to the practice population, and impractical or out of date recommendations. Patients noted difficulties with communication of symptoms and access to services. Although there are available guidelines, physicians have difficulty with the implementation of certain recommendations due primarily to a lack of evidence.

Management of respiratory tract infections in young children\u2014A qualitative study of primary care providers\u2019 perspectives

Respiratory tract infections in young children are the most common cause of general practice visits in Australia. Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines, the treatment and management of respiratory tract infections in young children is inconsistent. The aim of the study was to explore the management of respiratory tract infections in young children from a multi-disciplinary perspective using across-sectional qualitative research design based on the theoretical domains framework and the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-B model. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 primary care providers to explore their knowledge, views and management of respiratory tract infections in young children. Interviews focused on symptomatic management, over-the-counter medications and antibiotic use, and data were thematically analysed. Our findings showed that factors such as primary care providers’ time constraints, parental anxiety, general practitioners’ perception of what parents want, perceived parental pressure, and fear of losing patients were some of the reasons why primary care providers did not always adhere to guideline recommendations. Primary care providers also provided conflicting advice to parents concerning over-the-counter medications and when children should resume normal activities. Overall, this study showed that complex interactions involving emotional and psychological factors influenced the decision making process of primary care providers’ management of respiratory tract infections in young children. A team care approach with consistent advice, and improved communication between primary care providers and parents is vital to overcome some of these barriers and improve guideline adherence. The findings of this research will inform the development of interventions to better manage respiratory tract infections in young children.

Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis.

There has been an increase in the incidence of acute pancreatitis reported worldwide. Despite improvements in access to care, imaging and interventional techniques, acute pancreatitis continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis, recent studies auditing the clinical management of the condition have shown important areas of noncompliance with evidence-based recommendations. This underscores the importance of creating understandable and implementable recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis. The purpose of the present guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of both mild and severe acute pancreatitis as well as the management of complications of acute pancreatitis and of gall stone-induced pancreatitis.

The “ABCs of AD”: A pilot test of an online educational module to increase use of the autonomic dysreflexia clinical practice guidelines among paramedic and nurse trainees

Context/ObjectiveDespite availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), gaps in autonomic dysreflexia (AD) knowledge and practice persist. A free, online educational module, the “ABCs of AD”, was developed to improve knowledge of the AD-CPGs among emergency healthcare personnel. We examine short-term changes in paramedic and nurse trainees’ knowledge of, and social cognitions towards using, the AD-CPGs following module completion.DesignPre–post.MethodsThirty-four paramedic and nurse trainees from two training programs in Canada completed measures immediately before and after viewing the online “ABCs of AD” module.Outcome measuresAD knowledge test; Theory of Planned Behavior social cognition questionnaire; module feedback survey.ResultsPaired samples t-tests revealed significant increases in participants’ AD knowledge test scores (M ± SDpre = 9.00 ± 2.46, M ± SDpost = 12.03 ± 4.07, P < 0.001; d = 0.84). Prior to viewing the module, participants reported positive social cognitions for using the AD-CPGs (all Ms ≥ 4.84 out of 7). From pre- to post-module, no significant changes were seen in participants’ social cognitions for using the AD-CPGs. Participants’ average module viewing time was 36.73 ± 24.17 minutes (range 8–90 minutes). There was a decline in viewing from the first to the last module sections, with only half of participants viewing all six sections.ConclusionKnowledge alone is insufficient for clinical behavior change; as such, social cognitive determinants of behavior should be explicitly targeted in future iterations of the module to increase the likelihood of increased use of the AD-CPGs. To engage viewers across all module sections, the “ABCs of AD” module should include supplementary learning strategies, such as interactive quizzes and peer-to-peer interaction.