Aortic valve replacement is an increasingly common procedure. With the advent of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), patients that would have previously been denied valve replacement are able to undergo intervention. The anatomic proximity of the aortic valve and the native conduction system can lead to significant conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. This retrospective study aimed to compare the incidence, temporality and eventual recovery of conduction abnormalities in patients undergoing PPM implantation post TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). During the 5-year study period, 1012 patients had aortic valve replacement, 746 underwent SAVR and 266 patients underwent TAVI. In this group, patients were screened for pacemaker implantation within 14 days post procedure and were included if the pacemaker implantation was due to new AV conduction abnormalities. Patients were excluded if they had a pacemaker prior to surgery or had alternate reasons for pacemaker implantation such as complications from infective endocarditis. The incidence of new AV conduction abnormalities requiring pacemaker implantation post-operatively was 5.3% (n=14) in TAVI patients and 3.4% (n=26) in SAVR patients. In the TAVI group PPM implantation occurred on average at 3.2 ± 2.1 days (median 3 days) post procedure. In the SAVR group the average time to implantation was 6 ± 3.1 days (median 5 days). To determine conduction recovery 36 patients had complete follow up, 26 patients in SAVR and 10 patients in TAVI group. After a mean follow-up of 3 months, 50% of patients in the TAVI group and 36.1% in SAVR group recovered 1:1 conduction. At 12 months, 60% of patients in the TAVI group and 41% in the SAVR group had improved conduction and by 24 months it was 50% and 34.5%, respectively. In patients who undergo PPM implant post TAVI a high rate of conduction recovery is observed during follow-up, probably emphasizing the need for better selection of pacing candidates.