ABSTRACT Ethereum is a major public blockchain. Besides being the second-largest digital currency by market capitalization for its cryptocurrency, the Ether (Ξ), it is also the foundation of Web3 and decentralized applications, or DApps, that are fuelled by Smart Contracts. At the time of this writing, Ethereum still uses Proof of Work (PoW) consensus algorithm to ensure the integrity of the blockchain and to prevent double spend. PoW requires the participation of miners, who are incentivized to assemble blocks of transactions by being rewarded with cryptocurrency paid by transaction originators and by the blockchain network itself via newly minted Ξ. Network fees for transaction submissions are called gas, by analogy to the fuel used by cars, and are negotiable. They are also highly volatile and hence it is critical to predict the direction they are heading into, so that one can time transaction submissions, when feasible. There have been several efforts to predict gas prices, including usage of large Mempools, analysis of committed blocks, and more recent ones using Facebook's Prophet model [Taylor, S. J., & Letham, B. (2017). Forecasting at scale. PeerJ Preprints, 5, e3190v2. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3190v2]. In this study, we introduce an innovative approach that employs the DeepAR [Salinas, D., Flunkert, V., Gasthaus, J., & Januschowski, T. (2020). Deepar: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.07.001] model, known for its superior forecasting accuracy over conventional methods by virtue of its ability to learn from multiple related time series. This methodology not only offers immediate advantages but also holds promise for ongoing enhancements. We substantiate our claims through empirical testing, utilizing data extracts from the Ethereum blockchain and cryptocurrency price feeds. This document is an extended version of our ICCS 2022 paper on the same topic. In this paper, we dive deeper into the internals of DeepAR forecasting algorithm [Salinas, D., Flunkert, V., Gasthaus, J., & Januschowski, T. (2020). Deepar: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.07.001], analyse the correlation between the on-chain/off-chain sample data, and describe additional experiments that empirically prove our findings and, finally, perform a comparison of our outputs with those from the Prophet [Taylor, S. J., & Letham, B. (2017). Forecasting at scale. PeerJ Preprints, 5, e3190v2. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3190v2] model.