In light of global biodiversity loss, comprehensive monitoring of species and biodiversity is fundamental for effective conservation management. Technology‐driven approaches, particularly in the field of bioacoustics, have gained importance, with autonomous recording units (ARUs) such as the AudioMoth being a notable example. However, a systematic application of this technology in large‐scale passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) schemes is challenging because of a lack of species‐specific calibration techniques and information on survey design. Using Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola as our focal species, we present application‐oriented guidelines for testing and implementing a terrestrial, single‐species PAM scheme. In this process, we assessed the species‐specific detection space of AudioMoths, considering the influence of recording setup and location. ARUs had similar detection rates as a human observer when set up in locations with low vegetation. A further comparative analysis of bioacoustic and traditional roding surveys confirmed the comparability of the two methods. The last step comprised an evaluation of BirdNET as a means of automated species detection. Although BirdNET reliably detected Woodcock occurrence, our results underline the need for rigorous testing of computer‐aided data analysis as well as recording hardware before establishing PAM. We demonstrate that low‐cost open source ARUs and open access analysis tools can yield results on a par with traditional survey methods, and we provide specific recommendations for PAM for Eurasian Woodcock.
Read full abstract