Previous studies explored MRI-based radiomic features for differentiating between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive breast cancer, but deep learning's effectiveness is uncertain. This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning system using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for automated tumor segmentation and classification of HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive statuses. Retrospective. One thousand two hundred ninety-four breast cancer patients from three centers who underwent DCE-MRI before surgery were included in the study (52 ± 11 years, 811/204/279 for training/internal testing/external testing). 3 T scanners, using T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence, T1-weighted 3D enhanced fast gradient-echo sequence and T1-weighted turbo field echo sequence. An automated model segmented tumors utilizing DCE-MRI data, followed by a deep learning models (ResNetGN) trained to classify HER2 statuses. Three models were developed to distinguish HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive from their respective non-HER2 categories. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the segmentation performance of the model. Evaluation of the model performances for HER2 statuses involved receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The automatic segmentation network achieved DSC values of 0.85 to 0.90 compared to the manual segmentation across different sets. The deep learning models using ResNetGN achieved AUCs of 0.782, 0.776, and 0.768 in differentiating HER2-zero from others in the training, internal test, and external test sets, respectively. Similarly, AUCs of 0.820, 0.813, and 0.787 were achieved for HER2-low vs. others, and 0.792, 0.745, and 0.781 for HER2-positive vs. others, respectively. The proposed DCE-MRI-based deep learning system may have the potential to preoperatively distinct HER2 expressions of breast cancers with therapeutic implications. 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Read full abstract