Automated Tube Voltage Selection Research Articles

Evaluation of a Tube Voltage-Based Contrast Media Adaptation in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Personalized Triphasic Injection Protocols: A Matched Case-Control Study

Rationale and ObjectivesCoronary CT angiography (CCTA) has recently been established as a first line test in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Due to the increased use of CCTA, strategies to reduce radiation and contrast medium (CM) exposure is of high importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of automated tube voltage selection (ATVS)-adapted CM injection protocol for CCTA compared to a clinically established triphasic injection protocol in terms of image quality, radiation exposure, and CM administration Material and MethodsPatients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled from July 2021 to July 2023. Patients underwent CCTA using a modified triphasic CM injection protocol tailored to the tube voltage by the ATVS algorithm, in a range of 70 to 130kV with a 10kV interval. The injection protocol consisted of two phases of mixed CM and saline boluses with different proportions to assure a voltage-specific iodine delivery rate, followed by a third phase of saline flush. This cohort was compared to a control group identified retrospectively and scanned on the same CT system but with a standard triphasic CM protocol. Radiation and contrast dose, subjective and objective image quality (contrast-to-noise-ratio [CNR] and signal-to-noise-ratio [SNR]) were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe final population consisted of 120 prospective patients matched with 120 retrospective controls, with 20 patients in each kV group. The 120kV group was excluded from the statistical analysis due to insufficient sample size. A significant CM reduction was achieved in the prospective group overall (46.0 [IQR 37.0-52.0] vs. 51.3 [IQR 40.1-73.0] ml, p<0.001) and at all kV levels too (all pairwise p<0.001). There were no significant differences in radiation dose (6.13 ± 4.88 vs. 5.97 ± 5.51 mSv, p=0.81), subjective image quality (median score of 4 [3–5] vs 4 [3–5], p=0.40), CNR, and SNR in the aorta and the left anterior descending coronary artery (all p>0.05). ConclusionATVS-adapted CM injection protocol allows for diagnostic quality CCTA with reduced CM volume while maintaining similar radiation exposure, subjective and objective image quality.

Comparison of dose length product and image quality of a biphasic whole-body polytrauma CT protocol with and without the automatic tube voltage selection.

A significant source of man-made radiation is now linked to medical devices especially X-ray imaging based ones like CT scans which expose the body to cumulative ionizing radiation and thus attendant cancer risks. The aim of this study was to determine whether using a combination of Automatic Tube Current Modulation (ATCM) and Automatic Tube Voltage Selection (ATVS) during two-phase whole-body CT (2PWBCT) examinations would reduce the radiation dose while preserving the image quality. This was a prospective, observational, single-centre study of 127 adult patients who had undergone the 2PWBCT polytraumatic protocol. All were examined on a Somatom Drive scanner (Siemens). The patients were divided into two groups: ATCM only (42 patients) and ATCM +ATVS (85 patients). Patients' arm positions during examination and the examination dose length product (DLP) values were recorded, as well the standard deviations (SD) of the density in reference areas on CT scans for the image quality assessment. The DLP values and image quality in the groups were compared using ANOVA. Mean Total DLP (in mGy*cm): ATCM only: 3337 +/-797, ATCM+ATVS: 3402 +/-830; P=0.674. No effect of arm position (P=0.586). Mean density SD values in reference areas (in HU) in ATCM only: 49 +/-45, 15 +/-6, 9 +/-2, 12 +/-4, 10 +/-3, in ATCM+ATVS: 48 +/-45, 17 +/-6, 11 +/-3, 15 +/-6, 12 +/-4. SD values was higher in ATCM+ATVS group (P<0.001). Combination of ATVS and ATCM in polytraumatic 2PWBCT leads to no significant radiation load reduction compared with ATCM only but does lead to a slight degradation of image quality. The radiation load is significantly reduced if the patient has their arms behind the head when scanning, regardless of the activation of ATVS.

An Intra-Individual Comparison of Low-keV Photon-Counting CT versus Energy-Integrating-Detector CT Angiography of the Aorta.

This retrospective study aims to provide an intra-individual comparison of aortic CT angiographies (CTAs) using first-generation photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) and third-generation energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). High-pitch CTAs were performed with both scanners and equal contrast-agent protocols. EID-CT employed automatic tube voltage selection (90/100 kVp) with reference tube current of 434/350 mAs, whereas multi-energy PCD-CT scans were generated with fixed tube voltage (120 kVp), image quality level of 64, and reconstructed as 55 keV monoenergetic images. For image quality assessment, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated, and subjective evaluation (overall quality, luminal contrast, vessel sharpness, blooming, and beam hardening) was performed independently by three radiologists. Fifty-seven patients (12 women, 45 men) were included with a median interval between examinations of 12.7 months (interquartile range 11.1 months). Using manufacturer-recommended scan protocols resulted in a substantially lower radiation dose in PCD-CT (size-specific dose estimate: 4.88 ± 0.48 versus 6.28 ± 0.50 mGy, p < 0.001), while CNR was approximately 50% higher (41.11 ± 8.68 versus 27.05 ± 6.73, p < 0.001). Overall image quality and luminal contrast were deemed superior in PCD-CT (p < 0.001). Notably, EID-CT allowed for comparable vessel sharpness (p = 0.439) and less pronounced blooming and beam hardening (p < 0.001). Inter-rater agreement was good to excellent (0.58-0.87). Concluding, aortic PCD-CTAs facilitate increased image quality with significantly lower radiation dose compared to EID-CTAs.

Individualized scan protocols for CT angiography: an animal study for contrast media or radiation dose optimization

BackgroundWe investigated about optimization of contrast media (CM) dose or radiation dose in thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) by automated tube voltage selection (ATVS) system configuration and CM protocol adaption.MethodsIn six minipigs, CTA-optimized protocols were evaluated regarding objective (contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR) and subjective (6 criteria assessed by Likert scale) image quality. Scan parameters were automatically adapted by the ATVS system operating at 90-kV semi-mode and configured for standard, CM saving, or radiation dose saving (image task, quality settings). Injection protocols (dose, flow rate) were adapted manually. This approach was tested for normal and simulated obese conditions.ResultsRadiation exposure (volume-weighted CT dose index) for normal (obese) conditions was 2.4 ± 0.7 (5.0 ± 0.7) mGy (standard), 4.3 ± 1.1 (9.0 ± 1.3) mGy (CM reduced), and 1.7 ± 0.5 (3.5 ± 0.5) mGy (radiation reduced). The respective CM doses for normal (obese) settings were 210 (240) mgI/kg, 155 (177) mgI/kg, and 252 (288) mgI/kg. No significant differences in CNR (normal; obese) were observed between standard (17.8 ± 3.0; 19.2 ± 4.0), CM-reduced (18.2 ± 3.3; 20.5 ± 4.9), and radiation-saving CTAs (16.0 ± 3.4; 18.4 ± 4.1). Subjective analysis showed similar values for optimized and standard CTAs. Only the parameter diagnostic acceptability was significantly lower for radiation-saving CTA compared to the standard CTA.ConclusionsThe CM dose (-26%) or radiation dose (-30%) for thoracoabdominal CTA can be reduced while maintaining objective and subjective image quality, demonstrating the feasibility of the personalization of CTA scan protocols.Key points• Computed tomography angiography protocols could be adapted to individual patient requirements using an automated tube voltage selection system combined with adjusted contrast media injection.• Using an adapted automated tube voltage selection system, a contrast media dose reduction (-26%) or radiation dose reduction (-30%) could be possible

Ladder-Like Low Iodine Delivery Rate Injection Protocols Based on BMI at 70 KV by Automated Tube Voltage Selection in Coronary CTA.

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of reducing the injection velocity and volume of contrast agent according to BMI, and the effect of body weight (BW), body surface area（BSA）, body mass index（BMI），and blood volume (BV) on aortic contrast enhancement when the voltage of third-generation dual-source CT is selected at 70 KV. Methods A total of 280 patients selected at 70 KV were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Each group was divided into 7 subgroups according to BMI ≤20, 20–21, 21-22, 22-23, 23-24, 24-25, and 25–26. The experimental group uses 2.3/2.4/2.5/2.6/2.7/2.8/2.9 ml/s injection speed with 350 mgI/ml contrast agents according to the subgroups; injection time was fixed at 10 s. In the control group, the fixed injection flow rate was 3.5 ml/s, time was 12 s with a total of 42 ml. Subjects in both groups were inspected to adaptive prospective ECG-gating sequence scanning, and subjective and objective image quality of the two groups were compared using Student's t-test. BMI, BSA, and BV were calculated from the patient's body weight and height. We assess the relationship between aortic attenuation and BW, BMI, BV, and BSA using regression analysis or correlation analysis. Results Significant differences exist in vascular enhancement between the two groups; SNR and CNR of objective image quality in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Both groups had the same subjective image scores (P > 0.05). The number of vessels in the optimal enhancement range counts more in the experimental group than in the control group (χ2 value = 334.25, P ＜ 0.05). In the control group, a weak to medium correlation was seen between vascular enhancement and BMI (r = −0.20), BW (r = −0.42), BSA (r = −0.46), and BV (r = −0.48) (P ＜ 0.05 for all). Conclusions Compared to BW, BSA, and BV, a weaker negative correlation exists between vascular enhancement and BMI when ATVS selects 70 KV. However, as a much easier way to operate, the stepped low flow and low-contrast agent injection based on BMI was feasible, and the image quality was more homogenized than that of the control group.

Organ-based tube current modulation and bismuth eye shielding in pediatric head computed tomography.

Exposure of the eye lens to ionizing radiation results in cataract. Several dose optimization techniques to protect the lens are available for computed tomography (CT). The radiation dose to the eye lens, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and image quality of various methods of dose optimization were evaluated for pediatric head CT: automated tube current modulation (ATCM), automated tube voltage selection (ATVS), organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM) and bismuth shielding. An anthropomorphic phantom of a 5-year-old child was scanned with nine protocols: no dose optimization technique and then adding different dose optimization techniques alone and in combination. Dose to the eye, thyroid and breast were estimated using metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimetry. CTDIvol, influence of timing of shield placement, image noise and attenuation values in 13 regions of interest of the head and subjective image quality were compared. The eye shield significantly reduced the eye lens dose when used alone, to a similar degree as when using all software-based techniques together. When used in combination with software-based techniques, the shield reduced the eye lens dose by up to 45% compared to the no dose optimization technique. Noise was significantly increased by the shield, most pronounced in the anterior portion of the eye. The combination of ATCM, ATVS, OBTCM and a bismuth shield, with the shield placed after acquiring the localizer image, should be considered to reduce the radiation dose to the eye lens in pediatric head CT.

Individualized Scan Protocols in Abdominal Computed Tomography: Radiation Versus Contrast Media Dose Optimization.

In contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT), radiation and contrast media (CM) injection protocols are closely linked to each other, and therefore a combination is the basis for achieving optimal image quality. However, most studies focus on optimizing one or the other parameter separately. Reducing radiation dose may be most important for a young patient or a population in need of repetitive scanning, whereas CM reduction might be key in a population with insufficient renal function. The recently introduced technical solution, in the form of an automated tube voltage selection (ATVS) slider, might be helpful in this respect. The aim of the current study was to systematically evaluate feasibility of optimizing either radiation or CM dose in abdominal imaging compared with a combined approach. Six Göttingen minipigs (mean weight, 38.9 ± 4.8 kg) were scanned on a third-generation dual-source CT. Automated tube voltage selection and automated tube current modulation techniques were used, with quality reference values of 120 kVref and 210 mAsref. Automated tube voltage selection was set at 90 kV semimode. Three different abdominal scan and CM protocols were compared intraindividually: (1) the standard "combined" protocol, with the ATVS slider position set at 7 and a body weight-adapted CM injection protocol of 350 mg I/kg body weight, iodine delivery rate (IDR) of 1.1 g I/s; (2) the CM dose-saving protocol, with the ATVS slider set at 3 and CM dose lowered to 294 mg I/kg, resulting in a lower IDR of 0.9 g I/s; (3) the radiation dose-saving protocol, with the ATVS slider position set at 11 and a CM dose of 441 mg I/kg and an IDR 1.3 g I/s, respectively. Scans were performed with each protocol in arterial, portal venous, and delayed phase. Objective image quality was evaluated by measuring the attenuation in Hounsfield units, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio of the liver parenchyma. The overall image quality, contrast quality, noise, and lesion detection capability were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = excellent, 5 = very poor). Protocols were compared for objective image quality parameters using 1-way analysis of variance and for subjective image quality parameters using Friedman test. The mean radiation doses were 5.2 ± 1.7 mGy for the standard protocol, 7.1 ± 2.0 mGy for the CM dose-saving protocol, and 3.8 ± 0.4 mGy for the radiation dose-saving protocol. The mean total iodine load in these groups was 13.7 ± 1.7, 11.4 ± 1.4, and 17.2 ± 2.1 g, respectively. No significant differences in subjective overall image or contrast quality were found. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were not significantly different between protocols in any scan phase. Significantly more noise was seen when using the radiation dose-saving protocol (P < 0.01). In portal venous and delayed phases, the mean attenuation of the liver parenchyma significantly differed between protocols (P < 0.001). Lesion detection was significantly better in portal venous phase using the CM dose-saving protocol compared with the radiation dose-saving protocol (P = 0.037). In this experimental setup, optimizing either radiation (-26%) or CM dose (-16%) is feasible in abdominal CT imaging. Individualizing either radiation or CM dose leads to comparable objective and subjective image quality. Personalized abdominal CT examination protocols can thus be tailored to individual risk assessment and might offer additional degrees of freedom.

Influence of Contrast Agent Injection Scheme Customized by Dual-Source CT Based on Automatic Tube Voltage Technology on Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Coronary Artery Imaging.

ObjectiveTo explore the influence of a contrast agent injection scheme customized by dual-source CT based on automatic tube voltage technology on coronary imaging image quality and radiation dose.MethodsA total of 205 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in our hospital from June 2021 to September 2021 were selected. 105 patients in the control group who underwent routine scanning according to body mass (BMI) and 100 patients in the observation group who set tube voltage and contrast agent dosage according to automatic tube voltage selection technology. CT values of the aortic root (AO); left anterior descending (LAD) branch; proximal, middle, and distal segments of the right coronary artery (RCA); and proximal and distal segments of left circumflex (LCX) branch were measured. We calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the image. Image quality scoring and effective dose (ED) calculation were carried out.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the CT value, SNR value, and CNR value of each part of the artery between the two groups (P > 0.05). Image quality scores of the control group and the observation group were 1.28 ± 0.25 and 1.25 ± 0.23, respectively, and there was no significant difference in scores (P > 0.05). In the control group, the dosage of comparator was 43.81 ± 6.74 ml, and the ED was 4.92 ± 1.26 mSv. The dosage of contrast agent in the observation group was 34.23 ± 6.39 ml, and ED was 3.05 ± 0.94 mSv. The dosage of contrast agent and ED in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe contrast agent injection scheme customized by dual-source CT based on automatic tube voltage technology can meet the clinical requirements of coronary image quality, reduce the radiation dose and contrast agent consumption, and help doctors choose a more accurate and reasonable examination scheme, which has certain clinical application value.

Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT with Clinical Photon-Counting Detector CT: Assessment of Image Quality and Comparison with Energy-Integrating Detector CT

To determine quantitative and qualitative image quality of contrast-enhanced abdominal photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) compared to energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in the same patients. Thirty-nine patients (mean age 63 ± 10 years, 10 females, mean BMI 26.0 ± 5.7 kg/m2) were retrospectively included who underwent clinically indicated, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in portal-venous phase with first-generation dual-source PCD-CT and who underwent previous abdominal CT with EID-CT. For both scan, same contrast media protocol was used. PCD-CT was performed in QuantumPlus mode (obtaining full spectral information) at 120kVp. EID-CT was performed using automated tube voltage selection (reference tube voltage 100kVp). In PCD-CT, virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) were reconstructed in 10keV intervals (40-90 keV). Tube current-time product in PCD-CT was modified in each patient to obtain same volume CT-dose-index (CTDIvol) as with EID-CT. Attenuation of organs and vascular structures were measured, noise quantified, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculated. Two independent, blinded radiologists assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale (overall image quality, image noise, contrast, and liver lesion conspicuity). Median time interval between the scan was 12 months. BMI (p=0.905) and CTDIvol (p=0.984) were similar between scans. CNRparenchymal and CNRvascular of VMI from PCD-CT at 40 and 50keV were significantly higher than EID-CT (all, p < 0.05). Overall, inter-reader agreement for all subjective image quality readings was substantial (Krippendorff's alpha=0.773). Overall image quality of VMI was rated similar at 50 and 60 keV compared to EID-CT (all, p > 0.05). Subjective image noise was significantly higher at 40-50 keV, contrast significantly higher at 40-60 keV (all, p < 0.05). Lesion conspicuity was rated similar on all images. Our intra-individual analysis of abdominal PCD-CT indicates that VMI at 50 keV shows significantly higher CNR at similar subjective image quality as compared to EID-CT at identical radiation dose.

High-Pitch Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta: Intraindividual Comparison to Energy-Integrating Detector Computed Tomography at Equal Radiation Dose.

The aims of this study were to determine the objective and subjective image quality of high-pitch computed tomography (CT) angiography of the aorta in clinical dual-source photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and to compare the image quality to conventional dual-source energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in the same patients at equal radiation dose. Patients with prior CT angiography of the thoracoabdominal aorta acquired on third-generation dual-source EID-CT in the high-pitch mode and with automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS, reference tube voltage 100 kV) were included. Follow-up imaging was performed on a first-generation, clinical dual-source PCD-CT scanner in the high-pitch and multienergy (QuantumPlus) mode at 120 kV using the same contrast media protocol as with EID-CT. Radiation doses between scans were matched by adapting the tube current of PCD-CT. Polychromatic images for both EID-CT and PCD-CT (called T3D) and virtual monoenergetic images at 40, 45, 50, and 55 keV for PCD-CT were reconstructed. Computed tomography attenuation was measured in the aorta; noise was defined as the standard deviation of attenuation; contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Subjective image quality (noise, vessel attenuation, vessel sharpness, and overall quality) was rated by 2 blinded, independent radiologists. Forty patients were included (mean age, 63 years; 8 women; mean body mass index [BMI], 26 kg/m2). There was no significant difference in BMI, effective diameter, or radiation dose between scans (all P's > 0.05). The ATVS in EID-CT selected 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 kV in 2, 14, 14, 7, 2, and 1 patients, respectively. Mean CNR was 17 ± 8 for EID-CT and 22 ± 7, 20 ± 6, 18 ± 5, 16 ± 5, and 12 ± 4 for PCD-CT at 40, 45, 50, 55 keV, and T3D, respectively. Contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher for 40 and 45 keV of PCD-CT as compared with EID-CT (both P's < 0.05). The linear regression model (adjusted R2, 0.38; P < 0.001) revealed that PCD-CT reconstruction (P < 0.001), BMI group (P = 0.007), and kV of the EID-CT scan (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with CNR difference, with an increase by 34% with PCD-CT for overweight as compared with normal weight patients. Subjective image quality reading revealed slight differences between readers for subjective vessel attenuation and sharpness, whereas subjective noise was rated significantly higher for 40 and 45 keV (P < 0.001) and overall quality similar (P > 0.05) between scans. High-pitch PCD-CT angiography of the aorta with VMI at 40 and 45 keV resulted in significantly increased CNR compared with EID-CT with ATVS at matched radiation dose. The CNR gain of PCD-CT increased in overweight patients. Taking into account the subjective analysis, VMI at 45 to 50 keV is proposed as the best trade-off between objective and subjective image quality.

Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Torsion Measurement of the Lower Limb: Introduction of a New Ultra-Low Dose Protocol.

This study analyzed the radiation exposure of a new ultra-low dose (ULD) protocol compared to a high-quality (HQ) protocol for CT-torsion measurement of the lower limb. The analyzed patients (n = 60) were examined in the period March to October 2019. In total, 30 consecutive patients were examined with the HQ and 30 consecutive patients with the new ULD protocol comprising automatic tube voltage selection, automatic exposure control, and iterative image reconstruction algorithms. Radiation dose parameters as well as the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and diagnostic confidence (DC; rated by two radiologists) were analyzed and potential predictor variables, such as body mass index and body volume, were assessed. The new ULD protocol resulted in significantly lower radiation dose parameters, with a reduction of the median total dose equivalent to 0.17 mSv in the ULD protocol compared to 4.37 mSv in the HQ protocol (p < 0.001). Both groups showed no significant differences in regard to other parameters (p = 0.344–0.923). CNR was 12.2% lower using the new ULD protocol (p = 0.033). DC was rated best by both readers in every HQ CT and in every ULD CT. The new ULD protocol for CT-torsion measurement of the lower limb resulted in a 96% decrease of radiation exposure down to the level of a single pelvic radiograph while maintaining good image quality.

Split-filter dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a study on image quality and radiation dose.

Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography is the diagnostic reference standard in suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Favorable results for dual-energy CT (DECT) images have been reported for this condition. Nowadays, dual-energy data acquisition is feasible with different technical options, including a single-source split-filter approach. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to investigate image quality and radiation dose of thoracic split-filter DECT in comparison to conventional single-energy CT in patients with suspected PE. A total of 110 CT pulmonary angiographies were accomplished either as standard single-energy CT with automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS) (n=58), or as split-filter DECT (n=52). Objective [pulmonary artery CT attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] and subjective image quality [four-point Likert scale; three readers (R)] were compared among the two study groups. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), dose-length-product (DLP) and volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were assessed for radiation dose analysis. Split-filter DECT images yielded 67.7% higher SNR (27.0 vs. 16.1; P<0.001) and 61.9% higher CNR (22.5 vs. 13.9; P<0.001) over conventional single-energy images, whereas CT attenuation was significantly lower (344.5 vs. 428.2 HU; P=0.013). Subjective image quality was rated good or excellent in 93.0%/98.3%/77.6% (R1/R2/R3) of the single-energy CT scans, and 84.6%/82.7%/80.8% (R1/R2/R3) of the split-filter DECT scans. SSDE, DLP and CTDIvol were significantly lower for conventional single-energy CT compared to split-filter DECT (all P<0.05), which was associated with 26.7% higher SSDE. In the diagnostic workup of acute PE, the split-filter allows for dual-energy data acquisition from single-source single-layer CT scanners. The existing opportunity to assess pulmonary "perfusion" based on analysis of iodine distribution maps is associated with higher radiation dose in terms of increased SSDE than conventional single-energy CT with ATVS. Moreover, a proportion of up to 3.8% non-diagnostic examinations in the current reference standard test for PE is not negligible.

Automated tube voltage selection and adapted contrast media injection protocols in CT angiography of the thoracoabdominal aorta

PurposeThe aim was to assess the image quality (IQ) in computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the thoracoabdominal aorta utilizing automated tube voltage selection (ATVS) with a subsequently adapted contrast media (CM) injection protocol.Materials and methodsA total of 104 consecutive patients referred for CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta were included. Scans were acquired on a 3rd-generation DSCT using ATVS with a quality reference tube voltage and current of 100 kV and 150 mAs. CM protocols were adapted to kV settings by modifying iodine delivery rate (IDR) whilst maintaining an identical injection time (13.3 s): 0.9 gI/s (70 kV), 1.0 gI/s (80 kV), 1.1 gI/s (90 kV) 1.2 gI/s (100 kV). Both objective (attenuation, contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise) and subjective (4-point Likert scale: 1 = poor/2 = sufficient/3 = good/4 = excellent) IQ were assessed.ResultsATVS assigned a 70 kV (n = 88) and 90 kV (n = 16) protocol in most patients. Fewer patients were assigned to an 80 kV (n = 4) and 100 kV (n = 1) protocol, these protocols were, therefore, excluded from further analysis. Attenuation on all designated levels of the thoracoabdominal aorta was diagnostic in 99.0% of the scans; 87/88 scans (98.9%) in the 70 kV group and in 16/16 (100%) in the 90 kV group. Overall mean attenuation was 349 ± 72HU for 70 kV and 310 ± 43HU for 90 kV. Subjective IQ was diagnostic in all scans. Overall effective radiation dose for 70 kV and 90 kV was 1.8 ± 0.2 mSv and 3.4 ± 0.7 mSv, respectively.ConclusionsAdaptation of CM injection protocols (IDR) to ATVS in CTA of the aorta—scanned with 70 kV and 90 kV—is feasible and results in diagnostic image quality.

Validation of CARE kV automated tube voltage selection for PET-CT: PET quantification and CT radiation dose reduction in phantoms

BackgroundApplied tube voltage (kilovolts, kV) and tube current (milliampere seconds, mAs) affect CT radiation dose and image quality and should be optimised for the individual patient. CARE kV determines the kV and mAs providing the lowest dose to the patient, whilst maintaining user-defined reference image quality. Given that kV changes affect CT values which are used to obtain attenuation maps, the aim was to evaluate the effect of kV changes on PET quantification and CT radiation dose using phantoms.MethodFour phantoms (‘Lungman’, ‘Lungman plus fat’, ‘Esser’ and ‘NEMA image quality’ (NEMA IQ)) containing F-18 sources underwent 1 PET and 5 CT scans, with CARE kV on (automatic kV selection and mAs modulation) and in semi mode with specified tube voltages of 140, 120, 100 and 80 kV (mAs modulation only). A CARE kV image quality reference of 120 kV/50 mAs was used. Impact on PET quantification was determined by comparing measured activity concentrations for PET reconstructions from different CT scans with the reconstruction using the 120 kV reference, and dose (DLP, CTDIvol) differences calculated by comparing doses from all kV settings with the 120 kV reference.ResultsCARE kV-determined optimal tube voltage and CARE kV ‘on’ dose (DLP) savings compared with the 120 kV reference were: Lungman, 100 kV, 2.0%; Lungman plus fat, 120 kV, 0%; Esser, 100 kV, 9.3%; NEMA IQ, 100 kV, 3.4%. Using tube voltages in CARE kV ‘semi’ mode which were not advised by CARE kV ‘on’ resulted in dose increases ≤ 65% compared with the 120 kV reference (greatest difference Lungman plus fat, 80 kV). Clinically insignificant differences in PET activity quantification of up to 0.7% (Lungman, 100 kV, mean measured activity concentration) were observed when using the optimal tube voltage advised by CARE kV. Differences in PET quantification of up to 4.0% (Lungman, 140 kV, maximum measured activity concentration) were found over the full selection of tube voltages in semi mode, with the greatest differences seen at the most suboptimal kV for each phantom. However, most differences were within 1%.ConclusionsCARE kV on can provide CT radiation dose savings without concern over changes in PET quantification.

Pelvic bone CT: can tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT and virtual radiographs be used as alternative for standard CT and digital radiographs?

ObjectivesTo compare ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT) of the osseous pelvis with tin filtration to standard clinical CT (CT), and to assess the quality of computed virtual pelvic radiographs (VRs).MethodsCT protocols were optimized in a phantom and three pelvic cadavers. Thirty prospectively included patients received both standard CT (automated tube voltage selection and current modulation) and tin-filtered ULD-CT of the pelvis (Sn140kV/50mAs). VRs of ULD-CT data were computed using an adapted cone beam–based projection algorithm and were compared to digital radiographs (DRs) of the pelvis. CT and DR dose parameters and quantitative and qualitative measures (1 = worst, 4 = best) were compared. CT and ULD-CT were assessed for osseous pathologies.ResultsDose reduction of ULD-CT was 84% compared to CT, with a median effective dose of 0.38 mSv (quartile 1–3: 0.37–0.4 mSv) versus 2.31 mSv (1.82–3.58 mSv; p < .001), respectively. Mean dose of DR was 0.37 mSv (± 0.14 mSv). The median signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of bone were significantly higher for CT (64.3 and 21.5, respectively) compared to ULD-CT (50.4 and 18.8; p ≤ .01), while ULD-CT was significantly more dose efficient (figure of merit (FOM) 927.6) than CT (FOM 167.6; p < .001). Both CT and ULD-CT were of good image quality with excellent depiction of anatomy, with a median score of 4 (4–4) for both methods (p = .1). Agreement was perfect between both methods regarding the prevalence of assessed osseous pathologies (p > .99). VRs were successfully calculated and were equivalent to DRs.ConclusionTin-filtered ULD-CT of the pelvis at a dose equivalent to standard radiographs is adequate for assessing bone anatomy and osseous pathologies and had a markedly superior dose efficiency than standard CT.Key Points• Ultra-low-dose pelvic CT with tin filtration (0.38 mSv) can be performed at a dose of digital radiographs (0.37 mSv), with a dose reduction of 84% compared to standard CT (2.31 mSv).• Tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT had lower SNR and CNR and higher image noise than standard CT, but showed clear depiction of anatomy and accurate detection of osseous pathologies.• Virtual pelvic radiographs were successfully calculated from ultra-low-dose CT data and were equivalent to digital radiographs.

Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta-Optimization of Automatic Tube Voltage Selection Settings to Reduce Radiation Dose or Contrast Medium in a Prospective Randomized Trial.

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of low-kV protocols with optimized automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS) settings to reduce either radiation dose or contrast medium (CM) with that of a reference protocol for computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the thoracoabdominal aorta. In this institutional review board-approved, single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial, 126 patients receiving CTA of the aorta were allocated to one of three computed tomography protocols: (A) reference protocol at 120 kVp and standard weight-adapted CM dose; (B) protocol at 90 kVp, reduced radiation and standard CM dose; and (C) protocol at 90 kVp, standard radiation and reduced CM dose. All three protocols were performed on a third-generation dual-source computed tomography scanner using the semimode of the ATVS system. The image-task-dependent optimization settings of the ATVS (slider level) were adjusted to level 11 (high-contrast task) for protocols A and B and level 3 (low-contrast task) for protocol C. Radiation dose parameters were assessed. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of protocols B and C were tested for noninferiority compared with A. Subjective image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Size-specific dose estimate was 34.3% lower for protocol B compared with A (P < 0.0001). Contrast medium was 20.2% lower for protocol C compared with A (P < 0.0001). Mean CNR in B and C was noninferior to protocol A (CNR of 30.2 ± 7, 33.4 ± 6.7, and 30.5 ± 8.9 for protocols A, B, and C, respectively). There was no significant difference in overall subjective image quality among protocols (4.09 ± 0.21, 4.03 ± 0.19, and 4.08 ± 0.17 for protocols A, B, and C, respectively; P = 0.4). The slider settings of an ATVS system can be adjusted to optimize either radiation dose or CM at noninferior image quality in low-kV CTA of the aorta. This optimization could be used to extend future ATVS algorithms to take clinical risk factors like kidney function of individual patients into account.

Influence of contrast material density and kV setting on detectability of calcified plaques on coronary CT angiography

PurposeTo analyze the impact of tube potential and iodine concentration on the visibility of calcified plaques in coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA). Methods & Materials164 consecutive patients (65.9 % men and a mean age of 57.1 ± 11.3 years) with suspected coronary artery disease underwent calcium scoring (CaSc) scan followed by cCTA with topogram-based automated tube voltage selection (70 kV, 80 kV, 90 kV, 100 kV or 120 kV). In 127 Patients (HC), we injected 50 mL of contrast material (CM) with a concentration of 400 mg iodine per ml and in 37 patients (LC) 50 mL iodine concentration of 280 mg/mL. Sensitivity of cCTA for detecting calcified plaques was calculated with CaSc serving as gold standard. Density of CM enhanced coronary vessels and calcified plaques were quantified by region-of-interest (ROI) measurements in unenhanced and cCTA image series. ResultsOverall sensitivity of cCTA to detect calcified plaques was significantly higher using LC compared to HC (79 % vs. 73 %; p = 0.0035). The impact of LC was impressive at 70 kV with an improved sensitivity of 70 % vs. 57.1 % in HC (p = 0.0082). Furthermore, density values of HC enhanced coronary vessels exceeded those of calcified plaques, especially at low kV levels. In LC, except for the 70 kV setting, higher density values were shown for calculi than enhanced vessels. ConclusionLow kV cCTA in routine using highly concentrated CM leads to reduced calcified plaque perceptibility and hence potentially underestimation of stenosis. Thus, low kV cCTA using CM with lower iodine concentration is necessary. In addition, a dose reduction up to 77.7 % can also be benefited.

The performance of non-ECG gated chest CT for cardiac assessment – The cardiac pathologies in chest CT (CaPaCT) study

PurposeEvaluating the prevalence of CAD on non-ECG gated chest CTs, image quality (IQ) and the clinical performance of the CAD-RADS classification for predicting cardiovascular events (CVE). Methods215 consecutive patients referred for chest CTs between May 2016 and March 2018 were included (3rd-generation DSCT) using non-ECG gated acquisitions with automated tube voltage selection (110kVqual.ref/40mAsqual.ref), pitch 2.65–3.0 and individualized contrast media injection protocols. Dedicated cardiac post-processing reconstructions (0.6 mm/0.4 mm/Kernel Bv36) were added to standard chest reconstructions.Two independent cardiac radiologists performed a 3-step analysis. In case of discrepancy, a third reader gave the final decision. Step 1: visual presence of calcifications; 2: scans with calcifications assessed for IQ using a 5-point Likert scale (poor/sufficient/moderate/good/excellent); 3: stenosis severity was analysed in detail (if Likert sufficient-excellent using CAD-RADS). Electronic patient files were checked to see if pathology was previously mentioned (incidental) and whether patients developed an CVE during follow-up. Results1: Calcifications were present in 156/215 cases (72.6 %), 74 of these were incidental. 2: In 68/156 (43.6 %) patients with calcifications IQ was rated sufficient-excellent. 3: CAD-RADS≥3 was seen in 39/68 patients (57.4 %), 12 times (30.8 %) findings were incidental. During follow-up (median 16 [0–35] months), 7/39 (18 %) patients with CAD-RADS≥3 developed a CVE. 17 patients died during follow-up. ConclusionCoronary calcification on non ECG-gated chest CTs was detected in 72.6 % of patients, cardiac assessment was feasible in nearly half of these patients. Only patients with a CAD-RADS≥3 developed CVE, therefore the CAD-RADS may help identify and guide patients at risk of future CVE.

Individualized coronary calcium scoring at any tube voltage using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm.

We prospectively investigate the feasibility of a patient specific automated tube voltage selection (ATVS)-based coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) protocol, using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm, to achieve significant dose reductions while maintaining the overall cardiac risk classification. Forty-three patients (mean age, 61.8 ± 9.0years; 40% male) underwent a clinically indicated CACS scan at 120kVp, as well as an additional CACS acquisition using an individualized tube voltage between 70 and 130kVp based on the ATVS selection (CARE-kV). Datasets of the additional CACS scans were reconstructed using a kV-independent algorithm that allows for calcium scoring without changing the weighting threshold of 130HU, regardless of the tube voltage chosen for image acquisition. Agatston scores and radiation dose derived from the different ATVS-based CACS studies were compared to the standard acquisition at 120kVp. Thirteen patients displayed a score of 0 and were correctly identified with the ATVS protocol. Agatston scores derived from the standard 120kVp (median,33.4; IQR, 0-289.7) and the patient-tailored kV-independent protocol (median,47.5; IQR, 0-287.5) showed no significant differences (p= 0.094). The intra-class correlation for Agatston scores derived from the two different protocols was excellent (ICC= 0.99). The mean dose-length-product was 29.8 ± 11.9mGy × cm using the ATVS protocol and 31.7 ± 11.4mGy × cm using the standard 120kVp protocol (p< 0.001). Additionally, 95% of patients were classified into the same risk category (0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, or > 400) using the patient-tailored protocol. ATVS-based CACS, using a kV-independent algorithm, allows for high accuracy compared to the standard 120kVp scanning, while significantly reducing radiation dose parameters. • ATVS allows for CT scanning with reduced radiation dose values. • KV-independent CACS is feasible at any tube voltage between 70 and 130 kVp. • ATVS applied to kV-independent CACS can significantly reduce the radiation dose.

Personalization of CM Injection Protocols in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (People CT Trial).

Aim To evaluate the performance of three contrast media (CM) injection protocols for cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) based on body weight (BW), lean BW (LBW), and cardiac output (CO). Materials and methods. A total of 327 consecutive patients referred for CCTA were randomized into one of the three CM injection protocols, where CM injection was based on either BW (112 patients), LBW (108 patients), or CO (107 patients). LBW and CO were calculated via formulas. All scans were ECG-gated and performed on a third-generation dual-source CT with 70–120 kV (automated tube voltage selection) and 100 kVqual.ref/330 mAsqual.ref. CM injection protocols were also adapted to scan time and tube voltage. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with optimal intravascular attenuation (325–500 HU). Secondary outcomes were mean and standard deviation of intravascular attenuation values (HU), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective image quality with a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor/2 = sufficient/3 = good/4 = excellent). The t-test for independent samples was used for pairwise comparisons between groups, and a chi-square test (χ2) was used to compare categorical variables between groups. All p values were 2-sided, and a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Mean overall HU and CNR were 423 ± 60HU/14 ± 3 (BW), 404 ± 62HU/14 ± 3 (LBW), and 413 ± 63HU/14 ± 3 (CO) with a significant difference between groups BW and LBW (p=0.024). The proportion of patients with optimal intravascular attenuation (325–500 HU) was 83.9%, 84.3%, and 86.9% for groups BW, LBW, and CO, respectively, and between-group differences were small and nonsignificant. Mean CNR was diagnostic (≥10) in all groups. The proportion of scans with good-excellent image quality was 94.6%, 86.1%, and 90.7% in the BW, LBW, and CO groups, respectively. The difference between proportions was significant between the BW and LBW groups. Conclusion Personalization of CM injection protocols based on BW, LBW, and CO, and scan time and tube voltage in CCTA resulted in low variation between patients in terms of intravascular attenuation and a high proportion of scans with an optimal intravascular attenuation. The results suggest that personalized CM injection protocols based on LBW or CO have no additional benefit when compared with CM injection protocols based on BW.