Automated White Matter Hyperintensities Segmentation Research Articles

Accuracy of TrUE-Net in comparison to established white matter hyperintensity segmentation methods: An independent validation study

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are nearly ubiquitous in the aging brain, and their topography and overall burden are associated with cognitive decline. Given their numerosity, accurate methods to automatically segment WMH are needed. Recent developments, including the availability of challenge data sets and improved deep learning algorithms, have led to a new promising deep-learning based automated segmentation model called TrUE-Net, which has yet to undergo rigorous independent validation. Here, we compare TrUE-Net to six established automated WMH segmentation tools, including a semi-manual method. We evaluated the techniques at both global and regional level to compare their ability to detect the established relationship between WMH burden and age. We found that TrUE-Net was highly reliable at identifying WMH regions with low false positive rates, when compared to semi-manual segmentation as the reference standard. TrUE-Net performed similarly or favorably when compared to the other automated techniques. Moreover, TrUE-Net was able to detect relationships between WMH and age to a similar degree as the reference standard semi-manual segmentation at both the global and regional level. These results support the use of TrUE-Net for identifying WMH at the global or regional level, including in large, combined datasets.

Optimizing automated white matter hyperintensity segmentation in individuals with stroke.

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a risk factor for stroke. Consequently, many individuals who suffer a stroke have comorbid WMHs. The impact of WMHs on stroke recovery is an active area of research. Automated WMH segmentation methods are often employed as they require minimal user input and reduce risk of rater bias; however, these automated methods have not been specifically validated for use in individuals with stroke. Here, we present methodological validation of automated WMH segmentation methods in individuals with stroke. We first optimized parameters for FSL's publicly available WMH segmentation software BIANCA in two independent (multi-site) datasets. Our optimized BIANCA protocol achieved good performance within each independent dataset, when the BIANCA model was trained and tested in the same dataset or trained on mixed-sample data. BIANCA segmentation failed when generalizing a trained model to a new testing dataset. We therefore contrasted BIANCA's performance with SAMSEG, an unsupervised WMH segmentation tool available through FreeSurfer. SAMSEG does not require prior WMH masks for model training and was more robust to handling multi-site data. However, SAMSEG performance was slightly lower than BIANCA when data from a single site were tested. This manuscript will serve as a guide for the development and utilization of WMH analysis pipelines for individuals with stroke.

U-net combined with CRF and anatomical based spatial features to segment white matter hyperintensities.

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are important biomarkers for cerebral small vessel disease and closely associated with other neurodegenerative process. In this paper, we proposed a fully automatic WMH segmentation method based on U-net architecture. CRF were combined with U-net to refine segmentation results. We used a new anatomical based spatial feature produced by brain tissue segmentation based on T1 image, along with intensities of T1 and T2-FLAIR images to train our neural network. We compared 8 forms of automated WMH segmentation methods, range from traditional statistical learnng methods to deep learning based methods, with different architecture and used different features. Results showed our proposed method achieved best performance in terms of most metrics, and the inclusion of anatomical based spatial features strongly increase the segmentation performance.

Performance of five automated white matter hyperintensity segmentation methods in a multicenter dataset

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a common manifestation of cerebral small vessel disease, that is increasingly studied with large, pooled multicenter datasets. This data pooling increases statistical power, but poses challenges for automated WMH segmentation. Although there is extensive literature on the evaluation of automated WMH segmentation methods, such evaluations in a multicenter setting are lacking. We performed WMH segmentations in sixty patients scanned on six different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners (10 patients per scanner) using five freely available and fully-automated WMH segmentation methods (Cascade, kNN-TTP, Lesion-TOADS, LST-LGA and LST-LPA). Different MRI scanner vendors and field strengths were included. We compared these automated WMH segmentations with manual WMH segmentations as a reference. Performance of each method both within and across scanners was assessed using spatial and volumetric correspondence with the reference segmentations by Dice’s similarity coefficient (DSC) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) respectively. We found the best performance, both within and across scanners, for kNN-TTP, followed by LST-LPA and LST-LGA, with worse performance for Lesion-TOADS and Cascade. Our findings can serve as a guide for choosing a method and also highlight the importance to further improve and evaluate consistency of methods in a multicenter setting.

Intra-Scanner and Inter-Scanner Reproducibility of Automatic White Matter Hyperintensities Quantification.

Objectives: To evaluate white matter hyperintensities (WMH) quantification reproducibility from multiple aspects of view and examine the effects of scan–rescan procedure, types of scanner, imaging protocols, scanner software upgrade, and automatic segmentation tools on WMH quantification results using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods: Six post-stroke subjects (4 males; mean age = 62.8, range = 58–72 years) were scanned and rescanned with both 3D T1-weighted, 2D and 3D T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) MRI across four different MRI scanners within 12 h. Two automated WMH segmentation and quantification tools were used to measure WMH volume based on each MR scan. Robustness was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and intra-class correlation (ICC).Results: Experimental results show that the best reproducibility was achieved by using 3D T2-FLAIR MRI under intra-scanner setting with CV ranging from 2.69 to 2.97%, while the largest variability resulted from comparing WMH volumes measured based on 2D T2-FLAIR MRI with those of 3D T2-FLAIR MRI, with CV values in the range of 15.62%–29.33%. The WMH quantification variability based on 2D MRIs is larger than 3D MRIs due to their large slice thickness. The DSC of WMH segmentation labels between intra-scanner MRIs ranges from 0.63 to 0.77, while that for inter-scanner MRIs is in the range of 0.63–0.65. In addition to image acquisition, the choice of automatic WMH segmentation tool also has a large impact on WMH quantification.Conclusion: WMH reproducibility is one of the primary issues to be considered in multicenter and longitudinal studies. The study provides solid guidance in assisting multicenter and longitudinal study design to achieve meaningful results with enough power.

UBO Detector – A cluster-based, fully automated pipeline for extracting white matter hyperintensities

We present ‘UBO Detector’, a cluster-based, fully automated pipeline for extracting and calculating variables for regions of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) (available for download at https://cheba.unsw.edu.au/group/neuroimaging-pipeline). It takes T1-weighted and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) scans as input, and SPM12 and FSL functions are utilised for pre-processing. The candidate clusters are then generated by FMRIB's Automated Segmentation Tool (FAST). A supervised machine learning algorithm, k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), is applied to determine whether the candidate clusters are WMH or non-WMH. UBO Detector generates both image and text (volumes and the number of WMH clusters) outputs for whole brain, periventricular, deep, and lobar WMH, as well as WMH in arterial territories. The computation time for each brain is approximately 15 min.We validated the performance of UBO Detector by showing a) high segmentation (similarity index (SI) = 0.848) and volumetric (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.985) agreement between the UBO Detector-derived and manually traced WMH; b) highly correlated (r2 > 0.9) and a steady increase of WMH volumes over time; and c) significant associations of periventricular (t = 22.591, p < 0.001) and deep (t = 14.523, p < 0.001) WMH volumes generated by UBO Detector with Fazekas rating scores. With parallel computing enabled in UBO Detector, the processing can take advantage of multi-core CPU's that are commonly available on workstations. In conclusion, UBO Detector is a reliable, efficient and fully automated WMH segmentation pipeline.

Improved Automatic Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities in MRI Based on Multilevel Lesion Features.

Brain white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are linked to increased risk of cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases among the elderly. Consequently, detection and characterization of WMHs are of significant clinical importance. We propose a novel approach for WMH segmentation from multi-contrast MRI where both voxel-based and lesion-based information are used to improve overall performance in both volume-oriented and object-oriented metrics. Our segmentation method (AMOS-2D) consists of four stages following a "generate-and-test" approach: pre-processing, Gaussian white matter (WM) modelling, hierarchical multi-threshold WMH segmentation and object-based WMH filtering using support vector machines. Data from 28 subjects was used in this study covering a wide range of lesion loads. Volumetric T1-weighted images and 2D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images were used as basis for the WM model and lesion masks defined manually in each subject by experts were used for training and evaluating the proposed method. The method obtained an average agreement (in terms of the Dice similarity coefficient, DSC) with experts equivalent to inter-expert agreement both in terms of WMH number (DSC=0.637 vs. 0.651) and volume (DSC=0.743 vs. 0.781). It allowed higher accuracy in detecting WMH compared to alternative methods tested and was further found to be insensitive to WMH lesion burden. Good agreement with expert annotations combined with stable performance largely independent of lesion burden suggests that AMOS-2D will be a valuable tool for fully automated WMH segmentation in patients with cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative pathologies.