Autologous Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair of abdominal bulge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a case report.

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for autologous breast reconstruction is associated with higher patient satisfaction and fewer abdominal morbidities at the donor site than the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. However, abdominal bulging occurs at a certain frequency, and there is no established treatment. Here, we present a case of laparoscopic hernia repair using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) method in a patient with a lower abdominal bulge after DIEP flap reconstruction. A 53-year-old woman underwent left nipple-sparing mastectomy, left axillary lymph node dissection, and breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap for left breast cancer 3years previously. We performed an eTEP method for an abdominal bulge. The absence of a hernia sac facilitated dissection of the retrorectal space, and a left-sided transversus abdominis release was performed, followed by mesh placement. No postoperative abdominal bulging was observed. Using the eTEP method for repairing an abdominal bulge after DIEP flap reconstruction is advantageous because it facilitates a relatively straightforward dissection of a wide area of the retrorectal space without a hernia sac.

One-Year Quality of Life Outcomes of Delayed Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Associated Patient Factors

One-Year Quality of Life Outcomes of Delayed Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Associated Patient Factors

The Use of Pedicular Arteriovenous Fistula (PAVF) in Microvascular Reconstruction to Enhance Flow Across the Microvascular Anastomoses.

Free flap success rates have improved dramatically over the past three decades, setting a high standard for microvascular reconstruction. However, rates of arterial or venous thrombosis, and subsequent failure, remain high in burn and trauma reconstruction when compared to autologous breast reconstruction and other elective flaps. To address the higher failure rate, we use a novel vascular approach. We create a pedicular arteriovenous fistula (PAVF), allowing the flow to be enhanced across the microvascular anastomoses. We performed a retrospective review of 13 consecutive patients with 14 free flaps who underwent PAVF creation by the first author, AO. All patients who required free tissue transfer for trauma and burn reconstruction were indicated for PAVF during this study period. The flaps in this study included ALT, fibula, parascapular, and partial latissimus. The perforator and pedicle for the flaps were dissected in the usual manner. Distal to the takeoff of the perforator to the flap, the pedicular artery and the larger of the accompanying veins were anastomosed to create the PAVF. Patients were followed for a mean of 171 days Thrombosis was a rare complication in the group with one venous thrombosis (n = 1, 7.14%) and no arterial thrombosis. The most common complication was return to the operating room n = 4 (28.57%), two of which secondary to hematomas (14.29%), one wound dehiscence and one venous thrombosis. This latter patient eventually had partial flap loss. We did not observe flap ischemia due to vascular steal, nor any venous congestion from pressurizing the venous outflow. As opposed to anticoagulation, flow enhancement aims to decrease the risk of thrombosis by reducing stasis. While further data is needed to compare the outcomes of venous enhanced flaps when compared to flaps treated prophylactically with anticoagulation, our initial data suggests that PAVF is a safe procedure and does not result in vascular steal or flap congestion.

Clinical Outcomes Following Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There is a lack of reliable evidence on the surgical outcomes of profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap breast reconstruction. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate its safety and compare it with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, aiming to offer more information on whether the PAP flap was an ideal alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve relevant articles. The postoperative complication rates following PAP reconstruction were pooled. Mean differences of patients' age, BMI, mastectomy weight and flap weight between PAP and DIEP group were calculated, and relative risk was estimated to compare their incidence of complications. Twenty-four articles reporting 1612 PAP flap breast reconstructions were included. The surgical success rate was 99.6%; the incidence of total and partial flap loss was 0.4% and 0.0%; the incidence of infection, hematoma, seroma, fat necrosis and wound dehiscence in recipient sites was 0.3%, 1.4%, 1.0%, 3.3% and 0.3%, respectively; the incidence of infection, hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence and sensory disturbance in donor sites was 2.0%, 0.9%, 3.5%, 9.2% and 0.6%, respectively. Compared to the DIEP group, the average age, BMI, mastectomy weight and final flap weight were significantly lower in the PAP group. No significant difference was observed in terms of flap failure, breast fat necrosis and donor site wound dehiscence. This systematic review demonstrates similar levels of postoperative morbidities for the PAP and DIEP flaps with some subtle differences and verifies the PAP flap as a second-line treatment for patients when the DIEP is unavailable or undesirable. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Commentary: Donor Site Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: A Retrospective and Prospective Study in a Single Institution.

Commentary: Donor Site Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: A Retrospective and Prospective Study in a Single Institution.

Evolution and Adaptations of Robotic DIEP Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review.

The integration of robotic technology into surgical procedures has gained considerable attention for its promise to enhance a variety of clinical outcomes. Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest has emerged as a novel approach for autologous breast reconstruction. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current techniques, outcomes, and complications of robotic DIEP flap surgery. A systematic literature search was conducted after PRISMA 2020 guidelines across databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from 2000 to 2023. Articles exploring robotic DIEP flap harvest for breast reconstruction were assessed to compare operative techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. The risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Fourteen studies involving 108 patients were included. Three studies used a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, whereas 11 studies used a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach. Preoperative planning utilized computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography imaging. The mean robotic operative time was 64 minutes, with total operative times averaging 574 minutes for TAPP and 497 minutes for TEP. The mean length of stay was 5 days, and the mean fascial incision length was 3cm. Overall complication rate was 14.9%, with no significant difference compared with conventional DIEP flap procedures. Robotic DIEP flap harvest is a promising technique that may reduce postoperative pain and limiting abdominal donor site morbidity. Potential limitations include longer operative times, variable hospital stays, and increased costs.

Breast reconstruction using the superficial circumflex iliac artery superficial branch perforator (SCISP) flap.

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. One downside is its risk of postsurgical herniation and bulging due to the opening of the rectus fascia and intramuscular dissection of the rectus abdominis muscle. Additionally this part of the surgery is very time consuming. While the superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator (SIEA) flap has been thoroughly described for total autologous breast reconstruction, the use of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap in this field is limited. This series introduces the use of an extended superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) perforator flap nourished solely by perforators of the superficial branch of the SCIA- artery for total autologous breast reconstruction.Superficial preparation over the abdominal wall was performed without incising the rectus fascia, dissecting the superficial branch of the SCIA and its accompanying veins and the superficial inferior epigastric vein for additional venous drainage.Four patients underwent successful autologous breast reconstruction with this extended SCIP (superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator)-flap-variation. The term superficial circumflex iliac artery superficial branch perforator (SCISP) flap was introduced to standardize the surgical technique for using only perforators of the superficial branch of the SCIA as free flaps.The SCISP flap is safe and viable for total autologous breast reconstruction, particularly for women with small to medium sized breasts and with superficial dominance of the abdominal vascular system.

The Utility of Indocyanine Green Angiography in Breast Reconstruction to Detect Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis and Free Flap Perfusion: An Umbrella Review.

Two of the greatest challenges in breast reconstruction are mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) and autologous flap failure. This review summarizes current evidence regarding the usage of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) in breast reconstruction, identifies knowledge gaps, and provides directions for future studies. An umbrella review was conducted to identify related syntheses in Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Clinical Trials databases. Data were extracted from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) that discussed the use of ICGA in breast reconstruction. Sixteen syntheses were included (10 SRs and 6 MAs). Syntheses showed much evidence that ICGA usage typically reduces MSFN rates. However, it tends to overpredict necrosis and is best utilized in high-risk patients or those with an unclear clinical picture. ICGA is also useful in autologous breast reconstruction by reducing rates of breast fat necrosis (BFN), total flap loss, and reoperation. ICGA usage may also aid in perforator mapping and selection intraoperatively, with minimal complication risk. Most syntheses had moderate quality scores; however, they were small with significant heterogeneity in protocols and complication definitions. The use of ICGA in breast reconstruction is safe and useful in decreasing rates of MSFN, BFN, and reoperation after free flap reconstruction.

Intraoperative Complications as Predictors of Flap Failure in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Intraoperative microvascular complications in autologous breast reconstruction significantly increase the risk of post-operative complications. No study has identified which specific intraoperative complications contribute to partial or total flap loss. A retrospective chart review of microsurgical breast reconstructions by five surgeons between 2009-2020 analyzed operative variables and patient outcomes, with complications determined from the operative report. Flap loss rates were compared between cases with and without intraoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Fischer exact and t-tests for discrete and continuous variables, respectively. Intraoperative complications were analyzed for 1465 autologous breast flaps performed in 916 patients. Early partial flap loss was predicted by arterial anastomosis revision (2.90% vs 0.44%, p=.03) and alternate venous outflow (14.29% vs 0.41%, p=.002), with no association with intraoperative thrombosis, venous revision, or difficult recipient or flap dissection. In comparison, early total flap loss was predicted by intraoperative arterial revision (5.80% vs 0.51%, p=.001), venous revision (5.45% vs 0.57%, p=.007), intraoperative thrombosis (12.12% vs 0.49%, p<.001), and difficult flap dissection (2.91% vs 0.59%, p=.04). Difficult flap dissection was the only intraoperative variable associated with late partial flap loss (6.80% vs 1.69%, p=.004). Late total flap loss only occurred in 6/1465 flaps, the sole association being difficult recipient vessel dissection (2.78% vs 0.29%, p=.03). Post-operative arterial and venous compromise occurred in 1.10% (13/1187) and 2.53% (30/1187) of cases with no intraoperative complications, respectively, compared to 3.2% (9/278, p=0.02) and 6.12% (17/278, p=0.002) in cases with an intraoperative complication. Alternate venous outflow predicts early partial flap loss, while intraoperative thrombosis, and arterial and venous revision predict early total loss. Difficult flap dissection was associated with early total and late partial flap loss, while difficult recipient vessel dissection was associated with late total flap loss.

The lumbar artery perforator free flap as an alternative option for breast reconstruction in low BMI patients: analysis of CT Angiography of donor sites across BMI.

In patients with a low body mass index (BMI), the options for autologous breast reconstruction are limited. With the hypothesis that adipose tissue deposition persists in the lumbar region compared to the abdominal wall, this study sought to investigate the lumbar artery perforator (LAP) free flap as an alternative reconstructive option in patients with deficient autologous donor sites consequent to a low BMI. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed, from a prospectively maintained database, of all consecutive DIEP flap breast reconstructions performed in our unit. A randomized selection of 100 patients with low BMI <22, normal BMI 22-24 and high BMI >30 was performed. Patient computerized tomography scans were analyzed to measure abdominal wall and lumbar tissue thickness and to define anatomical landmark relations of the lumbar artery perforator. A statistically significant difference was identified between the ratio of lumbar to abdominal wall thickness between BMI groups, highlighting preservation of the lumbar thickness in patients with low BMI. The mean distance at which the fourth lumbar perforator entered the subcutaneous tissues was 7.7cm lateral to the spinous process (range 6.4 - 9.5cm), with no significant difference between BMI groups, highlighting this consistent anatomical position. This study confirms a greater lumbar to abdominal wall thickness, therefore volume, in low BMI patients, with consistent lumbar perforator anatomy of 6.4 - 9.5cm lateral to the spinous process. The lumbar artery perforator flap should therefore be strongly considered for autologous breast reconstruction in this patients with a low BMI.

Embracing Robotics in Microsurgery: Robotic-Assisted Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

The integration of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has transformed various surgical disciplines, including more recently plastic surgery. While RAS has gained acceptance in multiple specialties, its integration in plastic surgery has been gradual, challenging traditional open methods. Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is a technique aimed at overcoming drawbacks associated with the traditional open DIEP flap approach. These limitations include a relatively large fascial incision length, potentially increasing rates of postoperative pain, abdominal bulge, hernia rates, and core weakening. The robotic-assisted DIEP flap technique emerges as an innovative and advantageous approach in fascial-sparing abdominal autologous breast reconstruction. While acknowledging certain challenges such as increased operative time, ongoing refinements are expected to further improve the overall surgical experience, optimize results, and solidify the role of robotics in advancing reconstructive microsurgical procedures in plastic surgery. Herein, the authors provide an overview of robotic surgery in the context of plastic surgery and its role in the DIEP flap harvest for breast reconstruction.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Radiotherapy: Consensus Report of the German-Speaking Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery (GSRM)

Autologous postmastectomy breast reconstruction is associated with favourable long-term clinical outcomes and superior patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared with implant-based reconstruction. However, adjuvant radiotherapy has traditionally been considered a relative contraindication to immediate flap-based reconstruction due to its unpredictable effects on the reconstructive outcome. While modern adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has been able to significantly reduce acute and chronic radiation-induced complications, plastic surgeons still hesitate to offer immediate autologous reconstruction to patients expected to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy. More recently, evidence has emerged suggesting a paradigm shift in favour of immediate autologous reconstruction despite subsequent radiotherapy. At the 44th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery (GSRM) in Bern, Switzerland, a workshop discussed the literature on PMRT and autologous breast reconstruction, aiming to establish consensus among the participants. Several areas of agreement were identified, including the goals of postmastectomy reconstruction, specifically the creation of a soft and sensitive breast symmetrical in shape and size to the unaffected breast via the safest procedure possible. The importance of preserving the maximum amount of native breast skin envelope through skin- and nipple-sparing approaches was emphasised. Finally, a consensus was reached that PMRT should no longer be considered a contraindication to immediate autologous breast reconstruction.

Incidence of and risk factors for post-operative venous thromboembolism after free flap breast reconstruction in a London teaching hospital: A retrospective cohort study

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following autologous breast reconstruction, assess risk factors that may predict incidence and assess the accuracy of the Caprini risk assessment model. VTE is a rare, but potentially lethal complication of autologous breast reconstruction. An accurate preoperative risk-stratification strategy is essential to improve patient outcomes by determining the patients who would benefit from extended thromboprophylaxis after surgery. Patients who underwent autologous free flap breast reconstruction at a London teaching hospital from 2019-2021 were included. Risk factors for VTE were analysed. VTE incidence was assessed, and the risk factors were identified using multivariate analysis. Overall, 368 patients were included in the study. Among them, 10 (2.72%) had a confirmed diagnosis of post-operative VTE, at an average of 23 days after surgery (range 3-64 days). All VTEs occurred in deep, inferior epigastric artery perforator flap patients with a history of breast cancer. Multivariate regression analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between the incidence of VTE and Caprini score (p=0.030) and length of hospital stay (p=0.007). Tamoxifen use was individually significant for VTE (p=0.043) but non-significant (p=0.106) when confounded for length of hospital stay (LOS) and Caprini score. Current VTE risk assessment tools do not accurately identify patients who are at risk of developing VTE following free flap breast reconstruction. The Caprini risk assessment model and LOS may be useful in predicting post-operative VTE in this cohort. These patients may benefit from extended chemoprophylaxis. Larger prospective studies are required to optimise risk prediction models in this cohort.

A Unique Advantage of a 24-hour Surgical Delay in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

The surgical delay technique can be used effectively in autologous breast reconstruction when there is unfavorable flap vascular anatomy or when the reconstruction necessitates a larger volume of donor tissue to obtain optimal results. The length of time between surgically delaying the flap to pedicle division and inset of the flap often varies based on surgeon preference but is typically approximately a week or longer. The authors present a case in which a 24-hour surgical delay was successfully used to augment deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for autologous reconstruction. This technique is beneficial as it does not allow time for scarring and adhesions to develop between stages and allows for both stages to be performed in the same hospital admission.

Current status of autologous breast reconstruction in Argentina.

Although the most common procedure for breast reconstruction in Argentina is tissue expansion and implant devices, autologous tissue is frequently utilized. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction and, whenever possible, it is the first option. However, there are clinical or other circumstances, when a local or vicinity flaps for autologous reconstruction is preferred, even if exists a surgical and hospital facility for doing microsurgical procedures. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe our experience with the use of local and vicinity flaps for volume and surface replacement in different requirements-autologous breast reconstructions post oncologic resections, volume replacement in weight loss patients and implant-explantation cases. We have utilized the modification of latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (LD) described by Hammond with excellent results and high patient satisfaction. Thoraco-dorsal artery perforator flap is indicated on skin sparing mastectomies (SSMs), immediate reconstruction of the nipple areolar complex and simultaneous coverage of an implant or tissue expander, in irradiated or to be irradiated patients. Lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap has gained popularity because the unique position of the perforator at the lower lateral corner of the breast. It allows harvesting immediate vicinity tissue and easy rotation to the breast mound. We have used a modification towards the lateral thoracic wall of the anterior intercostal artery perforator flap for volume reconstruction after implant explantation.in patients who required volume preservation. Medial intercostal artery perforator flap is advantageous whenever the sub-mammary tissue can be used deepithelialized for volume reconstruction with a medial base. The same submammary area harvested as a medially based flap can be irrigated by the LICAP as a reverse LICAP flap that might be designed toward any direction from the piercing point of its perforator. The rest of the donor areas described for breast autologous reconstruction are rarely reported. When surgical facilities and adequate surgical teams are available, the lower abdominal wall is the main donor area, and DIEP, the most common technique utilized.

Validating the porcine model for microsurgical perforator training: Can surgeons trained on pig perforator dissection successfully perform human DIEP flap procedures? A pilot study

Autologous breast reconstruction, especially using the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, is increasingly seen as a reliable, safe, and long-term alternative to implant-based reconstruction. Despite the recognized advantages of the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction, successful realization demands excellent anatomical knowledge, a thorough understanding of autologous breast reconstruction concepts and advanced microsurgical skills. Given that the porcine model is widely employed in microsurgical training, our study aims to assess this model using validated outcomes, with the objective of evaluating the enhancement in a surgeon's learning curve following training with this model. Forty DIEP flaps were harvested on 20 swines by a single surgeon in "Pius Branzeu Center" (Timisoara, RO) and "Drazan Institute" (University of veterinary of Brno, CZ) laboratories for microsurgical training in 6months (January 2015-June 2015). Then we analyzed data from 40 DIEP flaps harvested by the same surgeon on first 20 consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Perforator dissection time, surgeon-determined dissection difficulty score (DDS) and venous congestion rate were collected for each flap in porcine model and in patients, then compared and analyzed. The mean of DDS score analysis in first and second swines group dissection resulted as statistically significant (P-value 0.0001), while it was not statistically significant between those analyzed in the second group of swines dissected and patients (P-value 0.8037). Reduction in perforator dissection time between the two swines' groups and in venous congestion rates from the first swines groups to the second to the human group resulted statistically significant too (P-value respectively 0.0001 and 0.0079). The porcine model has been used for a long time together with other animal models for microsurgical training. Our study confirms and objective by validated scores that it is a valid and reliable model, comparable to the human one and which mimics the dissection of human perforating vessels.

"Metabolic Bridge Therapy Prior to Microvascular Breast Reconstruction in the Morbidly Obese: A Proof-of-Concept Risk Analysis".

Obese patients experience more complications after autologous breast reconstruction. This study evaluates how bariatric surgery modulates risk of complications in the setting of microvascular breast reconstruction. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) databases were queried for patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 undergoing bariatric surgery from 2017-2022. Outcomes included BMI and obesity-related comorbidities before and 1 year after bariatric surgery. Paired Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) scores were analyzed to evaluate risk modulation before and after bariatric surgery in the setting of microvascular breast reconstruction. A total of 1,026 patients were included with an average age of 47 and BMI of 44.7 kg/m2. Comorbidities included hypertension (601, 59%), type 2 diabetes (291, 28%), and cardiovascular disease (10, 1%). One-year outcomes after bariatric surgery included an average BMI of 32.7 kg/m2, with remission of type 2 diabetes in 29% of patients. Paired BRA risk analysis for microvascular breast reconstruction before and after bariatric surgery showed reduction in 30-day surgical complications (40.4% vs. 24.8%, P<0.0001), with an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 15%, relative risk reduction (RRR) of 36%, and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 7. Each 1 kg/m2 reduction in preoperative BMI was associated with a 3.4% reduction in surgical complications (P<0.0001). There is potential efficacy for metabolic bridge therapy in reducing complications for obese patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction.

Global perspectives on practices and preferences in Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: From flap selection to post-operative care: A descriptive quantitative study

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate present-day practices in the preparation, peri- and post-operative care for autologous free-flap breast reconstructions (ABR) worldwide, with the aim of enhancing informed decision-making for plastic surgeons during the planning stages of ABR. MethodsA global survey was conducted among 280 plastic surgeons and 39 plastic and reconstructive surgery societies worldwide, inquiring about the flap and donor site selection, surgical actions, perforator imaging and peri-operative care during ABR. ResultsEighty-two responses were received, of which 71% (n=58) were completed questionnaires. The preferred flap choice was the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap (85%, n=51), with the internal mammary artery as the most commonly used recipient vessel. Pre-operative imaging for ABR was typically performed using Computed Tomography Angiography (75%, n=44) and often combined with a handheld doppler. Handheld doppler was the most frequently used modality to localize perforator vessels during surgery (33%, n=19), with the majority using either one (47%, n=24) or two (51%, n=26) perforators intraoperatively. These preferences were consistent across all clinic types.Post-operatively, flap monitoring was primarily performed by the nursing staff, initially every hour on the first day and then at reduced frequencies on subsequent days.The most commonly used modality for monitoring flap viability was the handheld doppler. The average length of hospital stay was five days. ConclusionThis study provides valuable insights into current preparations, peri- and post-operative care in ABR procedures worldwide, aiding in the development of standardized practices and potentially improving patient outcomes.

Learning Curve Analysis for Robotic-assisted Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap

Summary: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the preferred method for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy, but risks the development of hernia, bulge, and decreased core strength. Robotic harvest of DIEP vessels may limit abdominal wall morbidity through smaller fascial incisions and preservation of motor nerves. This study shows the expected learning curve (LC) for robotic harvest and compares the LC between a general surgeon (GS) and a plastic surgeon (PS). A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent bilateral robotic DIEP flap harvest from October 2021 to September 2022. We evaluated robotic pedicle dissection time (DT) and compared the times between GS and PS. We calculated LC for each surgeon using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method, . The LC was identified as the peak of the CUSUM graph. Forty-four flap dissections were recorded during the collection period: 27 by the PS and 17 by the GS. There was no significant difference in DT between the GS and the PS (P = 0.366), and both surgeons saw a decrease in DT over time. Using the CUSUM method, we see the peak of the plot at patient 9 for the PS and the peak of the plot at patient 5 for the GS, after which cumulative DT decreased. As robotic harvest of DIEP flaps becomes accepted, plastic surgeons who wish to incorporate it into their practice may achieve proficiency in their DT within 10 flap harvests and a similar DT compared with robotic-trained GSs.

National Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes for Immediate Implant-Based Versus Autologous-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Breast reconstruction consists primarily of two methods: autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Each of these methods has its advantages and disadvantages. The current study used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), the largest inpatient database in the United States, to explore the trends, complications, and disparities in the use of IBR and ABR. The current study used the NIS database from 2016 to 2020, including the International Classification of Diseases, 10th version (ICD-10) codes. A propensity score-matching (1:1) analysis was used to match the IBR and ABR groups. The percentage of breast reconstruction increased from 58.8% in 2016 to 63.4% by 2020. The trend of ABR was upward, and the trend of IBR was downward. In addition, the ABR group had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.29), respiratory complications (OR, 4.26), vascular complications requiring surgery (OR, 7.82), blood transfusions (OR, 3.44), vasopressor need (OR, 1.409), and acute kidney injury (OR, 1.68). However, the ABR group had significantly lower rates of wound infection (OR, 0.430), wound dehiscence (OR, 0.213), wound seroma (OR, 0.602), and sepsis (OR, 0.252). A significant disparity was found in using ABR for different subgroups based on age, hospital teaching status, racial background, socioeconomic status, and hospital bed size. The current study showed an upward trend in the utilization of ABR and a downward trend for IBR. Although ABR had a higher rate of pulmonary, cardiovascular, vascular, and bleeding complications, it had a lower rate of wound-related complications.