Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases Research Articles

Exercise for improving bone health in patients with AIRDs: Understanding underlying biology and physiology.

Exercise has numerous health benefits in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). Regular physical activity can help maintain/improve bone health. The aim of the present article was to review current knowledge on the effects of exercise on bone health in patients with AIRDs, particularly in those experiencing a high corticosteroid burden. The article also aimed to discuss potential mechanisms underlying the benefits of physical activity/exercise on bone tissue. Potential explanations regarding the role of exercise on bone health in AIRDs include anti-inflammatory effects, mechanical loading, improvement in muscle strength, hormonal changes, improvement in balance, and effects on telomere erosion, deoxyribonucleic acid methylation, and gene expression. Current evidence regarding the outcomes of exercise on bone health in patients with AIRDs is predominantly derived from studies focused on rheumatoid arthritis. Expanding research to include other rheumatic conditions would enhance the overall understanding of this topic.

Clinical Characteristics of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome: Analysis from the CLASS project.

Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a rare systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) with significant heterogeneity and no shared classification criteria. We aimed to identify clinical and serological features associated with ASSD that may be suitable for inclusion in the data-driven classification criteria for ASSD. We utilized a large, international, multi-center "Classification Criteria for Anti-synthetase Syndrome" (CLASS) project database, which includes both ASSD patients and controls with mimicking conditions, namely SARDs and/or interstitial lung disease (ILD). The local diagnoses of ASSD and controls were confirmed by project team members. We employed univariable logistic regression and multivariable Ridge regression to evaluate clinical and serological features associated with an ASSD diagnosis in a randomly selected subset of the cohort. Our analysis included 948 ASSD cases and 1077 controls. Joint, muscle, lung, skin, and cardiac involvement were more prevalent in ASSD than in controls. Specific variables associated with ASSD included arthritis, diffuse myalgia, muscle weakness, muscle enzyme elevation, ILD, mechanic's hands, secondary pulmonary hypertension due to ILD, Raynaud phenomenon, and unexplained fever. In terms of serological variables, Jo-1 and non-Jo-1 anti-synthetase autoantibodies, antinuclear antibodies with cytoplasmic pattern, and anti-Ro52 autoantibodies were associated with ASSD. In contrast, isolated arthralgia, dysphagia, electromyography/MRI/muscle biopsy findings suggestive of myopathy, inflammatory rashes, myocarditis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension did not differentiate between ASSD and controls or were inversely associated with ASSD. We identified key clinical and serological variables associated with ASSD, which will help clinicians and offer insights into the development of data-driven classification criteria for ASSD.

Cost-Related Medication Behaviors for Patients With and Without Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

Medication nonadherence challenges the management of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). We investigated cost-related medication behaviors among patients with SARDs, and compared them to those of patients without SARDs, in a large diverse cohort across the United States. As part of the All of Us (version 7), a nationwide diverse adult cohort with linked electronic health records begun in 2017, participants completed questionnaires concerning cost-related medication behaviors. Chi-square tests compared responses between patients with SARDs, by disease and medication type, and to those without SARDs. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]). We analyzed data from 3,997 patients with SARDs and 73,990 participants without SARDs. After adjustment, patients with versus without SARDs had 1.56 times increased odds of reporting unaffordability of prescription medicines (95% CI 1.43-1.70), 1.43 times increased odds of cost-related medication nonadherence (95% CI 1.31-1.56), and 1.23 times increased odds of using cost-reducing strategies (95% CI 1.14-1.32). Patients with SARDs who reported unaffordability were 16.5% less likely to receive a disease-modifying drug (95% CI 0.70-0.99) but 18.1% more likely to receive glucocorticoids (95% CI 0.99-1.42). In addition, unaffordability of prescription medicines was likely to have 1.27 times increased odds of one to two emergency room visits per year (95% CI 1.03-1.57) and 1.38-fold increased odds of three or more emergency room visits per year (95% CI 0.96-1.99). In this large diverse cohort, patients with versus without SARDs had more self-reported cost-related medication behaviors, and those who reported medication unaffordability received fewer disease-modifying drugs and had more emergency room visits.

Features of proinflammatory activation of macrophages in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) are chronic pathological conditions that arise from an abnormal immune response and are accompanied by systemic inflammation. The most common ARDs include rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). The exact pathogenesis of ARDs remains unclear, but the complex influence of genetic, immunological and external environmental factors leads to the occurrence and further progression of ARDs. It has been shown that the cause of chronic inflammation may be proinflammatory activation of macrophages, in which an increase in the secretion of cytokines is observed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inflammatory response of macrophages in patients with RA, SLE and SSc. Materials and methods. The study included 143 participants: 47 patients with RA, 45 patients with SLE, 34 patients with SSc, and 17 people without ARDs and other chronic diseases. Isolation of a primary culture of monocytes was carried out by centrifugation in a ficoll gradient using magnetic separation from the whole blood of study participants. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was added to stimulate cells along the proinflammatory pathway. Cell cultivation was carried out for 24 hours. Determination of basal and LPS-stimulated secretion of IL-8 by macrophages was carried out in the culture fluid using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Proinflammatory activation of macrophages was calculated as the ratio of LPS-stimulated and basal IL-8 secretion. Research results. Basal secretion of IL-8 by macrophages was statistically significantly higher in the groups of patients with RA and SSc compared with the SLE and control groups. LPS-stimulated secretion of IL-8 by macrophages in the SSc group had statistically higher values compared to the RA and SLE groups. Proinflammatory activation of macrophages was reduced in the group of patients with RA compared to patients with SLE and the control group, and was also statistically significantly lower in patients with SSc compared to the control group.

Increased risk of adverse events among patients with vs. without systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease prescribed sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study.

Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) patients have been excluded from sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) trials given putative risks, but this risk magnitude is unknown. We aimed to quantify SGLT2i adverse event risks among patients with vs. without SARD. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, patients with SARD at Mass General Brigham, a multihospital system in Boston, Massachusetts, prescribed SGLT2i were age-, self-reported race-, and sex-matched to patients prescribed the same SGLT2i between 1/1/2016 and 12/10/2021. Cumulative incidence and Cox models, overall and sex-stratified, estimated patient-reported adverse event risks from prescription date, censoring for discontinuation, death, or study end (12/12/2022). Four hundred sixty-eight SARD and 420 matched non-SARD patients were compared: mean age 64years (SD 11.3), 61% female, and 70% White. SARD patients had shorter SGLT2i use duration (8.4 vs. 12.7months; p < 0.0001) and time to adverse event (0.59 vs. 0.85years; p 0.04). Yeast infections (9.8% vs. 6.2%; p 0.047) and muscular symptoms (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p 0.01) were more prevalent among those with SARD. Adjusting for baseline demographics, adverse event risk was higher (MV HR 1.68;95% CI 1.28, 2.21), in patients with vs. without SARD. Risk was higher in women than men overall and in women with SARD vs. without (adjusted HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.36, 2.54). Patients with vs. without SARD had 68% higher adverse event risk with SGLT2i use. Women with vs. without SARD had > 85% higher adverse event risks, although most were not serious. Trials of safety and efficacy of SGLT2i among SARD patients are warranted. Key Points •To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare adverse events associated with SGLT2i utilization in patients with vs. without SARD, despite RCT exclusion and documented SGLT2i use in the population. •In our comparison of 468 patients with SARD and 420 patients without, we identified a greater than 65% increase in risk of adverse event outcomes among patients with SARD. •Furthermore, we found that this risk disproportionately affected female patients, with a 4.4-fold increased risk among women with SARD compared to men without.

Artificial intelligence for predicting treatment responses in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: advancements, challenges, and future perspectives

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) present a significant global health challenge characterized by a rising prevalence. These highly heterogeneous diseases involve complex pathophysiological mechanisms, leading to variable treatment efficacies across individuals. This variability underscores the need for personalized and precise treatment strategies. Traditionally, clinical practices have depended on empirical treatment selection, which often results in delays in effective disease management and can cause irreversible damage to multiple organs. Such delays significantly affect patient quality of life and prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently emerged as a transformative tool in rheumatology, offering new insights and methodologies. Current research explores AI’s capabilities in diagnosing diseases, stratifying risks, assessing prognoses, and predicting treatment responses in ARD. These developments in AI offer the potential for more precise and targeted treatment strategies, fostering optimism for enhanced patient outcomes. This paper critically reviews the latest AI advancements for predicting treatment responses in ARD, highlights the current state of the art, identifies ongoing challenges, and proposes directions for future research. By capitalizing on AI’s capabilities, researchers and clinicians are poised to develop more personalized and effective interventions, improving care and outcomes for patients with ARD.

MIP-C: A new autoimmune rheumatic disease concomitant with the COVID-19 pandemic.

MIP-C: A new autoimmune rheumatic disease concomitant with the COVID-19 pandemic.

ANA-positive versus ANA-negative Antiphospholipid Antibody-positive Patients: Results from the APS ACTION Clinical Database and Repository.

This study focused on the prevalence and impact of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients without concomitant systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Data from aPL-positive patients with or without Revised Sapporo APS classification criteria were retrieved from the APS ACTION Registry. Patients with concomitant SARDs were excluded. 430 aPL-positive patients were included in the analysis, 56% ANA-positive and 44% negative. ANA positivity was significantly associated with history of hematologic manifestations (persistent autoimmune hemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia and/or lymphopenia) (16% of ANA-positive vs 7% of ANA-negative, p= 0.006). Triple aPL-positivity was more frequent in the ANA-positive subgroup (p= 0.02), along with low baseline C3 and C4 levels (p= 0.05 and p= 0.009, respectively), and higher frequency for extractable nuclear antigens (ENA). Among aPL-positive patients with no APS classification, ANA-positive patients showed a higher rate of arthritis (p= 0.006). Among female patients who have experienced at least one pregnancy, 113 were ANA-positive and 96 were ANA-negative; ANA-negative patients had a higher number of pregnancies (p= 0.018), and number of live births (p= 0.014). A wider proportion of ANA-positive patients were treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (p< 0.001). When we analysed aPL-positive patients with no other SARDs, ANA status was not associated with thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. Interestingly, ANA-positive patients showed higher rates of systemic autoimmune features, including hematologic manifestations, multiple aPL positivity, lower complement levels, ENA positivity, and joint involvement, and were more often treated with HCQ. Finally, aPL-positive subjects who were ANA-negative had a higher rate of pregnancies and live births.

Efficacy Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases in Mashhad, Iran

vaccination. However, since the majority of studies in the related literature are focused on the efficacy of messenger RNA in rheumatic patients, the present study aimed to assess the efficiency of the inactivated whole virus vaccines and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines in rheumatic diseases in Mashhad, Iran. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on ARDs patients who were referred to private clinics and rheumatologic clinics of Ghaem and Imam Reza Hospitals, Mashhad, Iran, during 2021-22. Anti-neutralizing antibodies have been considered to check antibodies of Sinopharm and Barkat vaccines, and an anti-spike antibody was considered to check Sputnik V and AstraZeneca vaccine antibodies. Humoral immunity was investigated using the anti-spike Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and anti-neutralizing antibodies. Results: The obtained results showed that humoral immunity after COVID-19 vaccination was observed in 73.9% of the patients with ARDs. However, humoral immunity was lower in ARDs patients who took tacrolimus and higher in patients with a history of COVID-19 infection (χ2=5.84, p=0.01). The infection after the second COVID-19 vaccination was lower in patients with humoral immunity (χ2=5.69, p=0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a homologous second dose of an inactivated whole viral vector SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was safe and provided a remarkable antibody response in ARDs patients.

Development and validation of an image-based questionnaire ARTROVIS to identify risk factors for the articular syndrome and related conditions

Background: The importance of timely diagnosis of rheumatic diseases is beyond any doubt. However, in the real practice the time from manifestation of the first symptoms to the assessment by a rheumatologist and treatment administration often exceeds the window of opportunity for disease control. At the moment, there has been no Russian-language questionnaire that would allow a primary care physician to suspect a rheumatic disease manifesting with an articular syndrome. Aim: To develop, validate and test a questionnaire to identify risk factors for joint disorders and related conditions. Methods: From November 2022 to April 2024, we performed the study on the image-based questionnaire on identification of the risk factors for joint syndromes and associated conditions (ARTROVIS), which we have developed for early detection of both joint syndromes, as well as comorbid conditions associated with elevated serum uric acid levels (hyperuricemia). The initial test version of the questionnaire was tested in a focus group of respondents (n = 20) who came for regular medical examination. Based on the results of this face validity assessment, we corrected the wording of 10 questionnaire items. At the second study step, we assessed the primary validity and reliability of the questionnaire in a group of 41 rheumatology patients. The third study step involved 828 respondents (408 men and 420 women, median age 19 [18,0; 20,0] years; 21% with joint syndromes), who came for routine medical examination. The reliability of the questionnaire, its face and discriminant validity, as well as sensitivity and specificity (the ROC analysis) were assessed from 827 questionnaires included in the final processing (one was excluded due to questionnaire completion defects). Results: The self-report questionnaire for patients (ARTROVIS) has 24 items aimed at collecting social and demographic data, identifying risk factors for non-communicable diseases, assessing genetic aspects, identifying complaints from various organ systems, providing information on medical treatments taken by the patient (non-steroid anti-inflammatory agents, diuretics, antihypertensives, glucocorticosteroids, chemotherapy and radiation therapy), as well as an additional question for women on current pregnancy pathology. The questionnaire contains visual aids (colored photos) that facilitate the detection of clinical signs of autoimmune (psoriatic arthritis, Reynolds’s syndrome) and inflammatory rheumatic disease (gout), as well as the differential diagnosis of the joint syndrome. The assessment of face validity of the questionnaire showed the total number of missed answers of 3.42%; 62.85% of the respondents gave their full answers to all items. Good discriminant validity was demonstrated. The ROC analysis showed high correlation between the questionnaire score and the presence of a joint syndrome: the area under the curve was 0.884. The Cronbach’s alfa was 0.798, which is sufficient for a medical questionnaire. Conclusion: We have performed the approbation and standardization of the questionnaire to identify risk factors for the joint syndrome and related comorbidities by assessing its validity and reliability. The ARTROVIS as a self-report questionnaire can be used in primary care as a tool enabling general practitioners and internists to decide on further patient routing to corresponding specialists.

Epstein-Barr virus as a potentiator of autoimmune diseases.

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is epidemiologically associated with development of autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Although there is well-established evidence for this association, the underlying mechanistic basis remains incompletely defined. In this Review, we discuss the role of EBV infection as a potentiator of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We review the EBV life cycle, viral transcription programmes, serological profiles and lytic reactivation. We discuss the epidemiological and mechanistic associations of EBV with systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. We describe the potential mechanisms by which EBV might promote autoimmunity, including EBV nuclear antigen 1-mediated molecular mimicry of human autoantigens; EBV-mediated B cell reprogramming, including EBV nuclear antigen 2-mediated dysregulation of autoimmune susceptibility genes; EBV and host genetic factors, including the potential for autoimmunity-promoting strains of EBV; EBV immune evasion and insufficient host responses to control infection; lytic reactivation; and other mechanisms. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic implications and potential therapeutic approaches to targeting EBV for the treatment of autoimmune disease.

Increased prevalence of inflammatory arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis, during 2020-2023 versus 2016-2019 in a Nation-Wide Cohort Study.

Although several studies have explored the geoepidemiology of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD), trends of their frequency overtime are under-investigated. Herein, in a nation-wide study, we examine trends in the prevalence of various ARD over-time, taking also into account the Covid-19 pandemic. In this retrospective study in the entire Greek adult population (approximately 10.000.000 people), we searched the electronic prescription database of the e-Government Centre for Social Security Services using prespecified ICD-10 codes to capture all adult patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) and Polymyalgia Rheumatica or Giant Cell Arteritis (PMR/GCA). Two sequential 4-year periods, namely 2016-2019 and 2020-2023 were compared. Prevalence of RA, PsA, AxSpA, SLE and SSc increased significantly during 2020-2023 compared to 2016-2019. This applies to both genders and to all age groups for RA, PsA and AxSpA, to female patients in SLE and SSc and to patients 18-39years in SLE and ≥ 60years in SSc. Overall, there was 47% increase in prevalence for AxSpA (0.100% in 2016-19 vs 0.147% in 2020-23), 36.5% for PsA (0.148% vs 0.202%), 20.6% for RA (0.467% vs 0.563%), 19% for SLE (0.137% vs 0.163%) and 13% for SSc (0.023% vs 0.026%). A 16.3% decrease was evident in GCA/PMR, limited to those ≥ 40years old. In a nation-wide study we confirm that ARD prevalence increases over-time, whereas a contribution of Covid-19 pandemic to our results during 2020-2023, cannot be excluded. Additional human, medical and financial resources will be needed to cover the increased needs of ARD patients.

B-104 Correlation of Anti-Centromere Antibodies (ACA) Detection by Indirect Immunofluorescence (IFA) on HEp-2 Cells and by ELISA Demonstrates High Concordance but Highlights Advantage of IFA

Abstract Background Anti-centromere antibodies (ACA), a type of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) first identified as a discrete speckled pattern on indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), are a hallmark of systemic sclerosis (SSc), especially in its limited cutaneous form (lcSSc) or CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud’s, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly and telangiectasia). These mitosis-related autoantibodies mainly recognize three centromere proteins (CENP), CENP-A, CENP-B, and CENP-C, that comprise the kinetochore important to chromosome segregation, but more recently, at least three other CENP antigens have been identified (CENP-D, CENP-E and CENP-F). Anti-CENP-B is considered the main autoantibody, and many, if not most, ELISA utilize recombinant CENP-B such that antibodies to CENP antigens other than CENP-B are not detected. Here, an ELISA using both CENP-B and CENP-A is compared to the reference method, HEp-2 cell IFA, highlighting its high, but still less than 100%, sensitivity due to multiple centromere subcomponents. Methods Anti-centromere antibodies are determined in patient serum using the reference method, IFA on the HEp-2 cell substrate (Sprinter XL/EUROpattern®, Euroimmun, NJ) which is also the current method for standalone ACA testing as well as screening by selected ANA profiles designed for the rheumatology specialist. Here ACA IFA- positive and negative serum samples were further analyzed by enzyme immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilizing recombinant CENP-A and CENP-B (QuantaLyzer® 3000, Werfen, CA). Results When compared, samples between ACA pattern by HEp-2 cell IFA and anti- centromere antibodies by ELISA yielded an agreement of 93.2%. McNemar’s Test Chi Square of p&amp;gt;0.999, with a relative sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 100.0%. Conclusions This study demonstrated very high concordance between ELISA and accurate ACA pattern identification on HEp-2 IFA. The ELISA studied here identifies autoantibodies to both CENP-A and CENP-B where many other ELISA identify only anti-CENP-B. Although ACA are relatively specific for SSc, they have also been reported in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjogren Syndrome, Raynaud's phenomenon and in cancer in individuals with or without evidence of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). Of note, many other commercially available ELISA for anti-centromere antibodies identify only anti-CENP-B, but there at least four other known CENP antigen targets for autoantibodies causing centromere pattern on IFA. Furthermore, almost all laboratories use the ELISA for ACA on ANA panel (or other connective tissue disease) screening. Hence, it should be duly noted that these testing strategies will not detect autoantibodies to all anti-centromere antibodies. Only specialized ANA profiles designed for the difficult-to-diagnose autoimmune patient begin screening using the IFA method for anti-centromere and therefore, are capable of detecting autoantibodies to all CENP antigens. Laboratorians should advise clinicians of these diagnostic limitations especially as our knowledge about centromere subcomponents and their clinical associations increases.

Head to head comparison of 18F-FDG and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging used in diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

The aim of this study was to determine the performance of radionuclide-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04) PET/CT in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) and compare it with fluorine-18 (18F) labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging. Fifty-eight participants with ARDs were prospectively enrolled from April 2022 to February 2024 and underwent dual-tracer PET/CT imaging. For both 18F-FDG and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT, imaging findings were interpreted and compared. The clinical significance was compared between18F-FDG PET/CT and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging. 18F-FDG imaging was positive in 53 out of 58 cases (91.4%) while Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 imaging was positive in 55 out of 58 cases (94.8%). Overall positive rate of Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 imaging was as high as 18F-FDG imaging (P = 0.625). 18F-FDG imaging detected more lesions in lymph node, spleen, and bone marrow. Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 imaging detected more lesions in the lung, muscle, and tendon/ligament. There was no statistical difference of composing ratio of grades of clinical significance between two imaging modalities (χ2 = 2.875, P = 0.238). The superior rate of Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging was higher than 18F-FDG imaging (P = 0.020). In subgroup of adult-onset Still's disease, 18F-FDG imaging showed better performance than Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 imaging. In most of the other subgroup of ARDs, Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging overperformed 18F-FDG imaging. Both 18F-FDG and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging have excellent sensitivity in ARDs. The detection capabilities of two tracers varied according to the involving organs of ARDs. In most of ARDs except adult-onset Still's disease, Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging overperformed 18F-FDG imaging. Key Points • 18F-FDG and Al18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging have excellent sensitivity in diagnosing of ARDs. • 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging detected more lesions in lymph node, spleen, and bone marrow. • 18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging detected more lesions in the lung, muscle, and tendon/ligament. • 18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging overperformed18F-FDG in most subgroups of ARDs.

Safety of Medications Used to Treat Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases During Pregnancy and Lactation.

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) often affect women during their reproductive years, and early studies of pregnancy in these patients reported high rates of adverse outcomes. Continuation or initiation of safe and effective medications in the preconception period is beneficial for maintaining or achieving disease quiescence throughout pregnancy thereby improving both maternal and pregnancy outcomes. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, the American College of Rheumatology, and the British Society for Rheumatology have published recommendations and guidelines regarding management of ARDs during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Gastroenterological Association have also provided guidance statements with relevant recommendations. This review provides an overview of available recommendations for medication use in ARD pregnancy, with discussion of safety considerations for maternal and fetal well-being. Medications considered compatible with pregnancy include hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and TNF inhibitors. Methotrexate, mycophenolate, leflunomide, and cyclophosphamide should be avoided before and during pregnancy. Other medications, most of them newer, are largely discouraged for use in pregnancy due to inadequate data or concerns for neonatal immunosuppression, including non-TNF biologics and small molecule therapies. Further investigation is needed regarding effects of non-TNF biologics, biosimilars, and small molecules in pregnancy. Important efforts for the future will include improved methodologies to gather critical safety data, with consideration of inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials, a complex and controversial issue. Long-term information on outcomes in offspring of treated women is lacking for many of these medications.

CA 15 - 3 in screening for systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease associated interstitial lung disease: a single center cross-sectional study.

The natural course of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) varies significantly and is linked to considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, effective screening is crucial for early detection of SARD-ILD. Biomarkers associated with mucin 1, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), are increased in various ILD. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the serum biomarker CA 15-3 as a potential screening tool for ILD in patients newly diagnosed with SARD. Conducted as a single-center cross-sectional study, the research included newly diagnosed SARD patients consecutively examined for ILD according to the algorithm. All included patients underwent chest high-resolution CT scans (HRCT), and serum levels of CA 15-3, KL-6, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured and correlated with other variables associated with possible ILD presence. Serum biomarker levels, specifically CA 15-3 and LDH, are significantly higher in ILD-positive patients (P<0.001 for both). An inverse relationship is observed between higher FVC values and lower CA 15-3 levels (Rho=-0.291, P=0.007). Similarly, higher DLCO values are associated with lower CA 15-3 levels (Rho=-0.317, P=0.003). Our findings revealed that elevated CA 15-3 levels are positively correlated with higher levels of KL-6 (Rho=0.268, P=0.01) and LDH (Rho=0.227, P=0.04). With a cut-off value of 24 U/mL, CA 15-3 showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (AUC=0.807, specificity=95.7%, sensitivity=71.1%). CA 15-3 emerged as the most significant predictor of a positive HRCT finding, accurately classifying 83% of cases. These results suggest that CA 15-3 shows promise as a valuable serum biomarker for screening SARD patients for ILD in routine clinical practice.

Prevalence and gender - specific analysis of a systemic sclerosis cohort in Latvia

BackgroundSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is considered by many to be one of the most severe autoimmune rheumatic diseases with lower prevalence observed in Northern Europe. No previous studies on the prevalence of SSc in Latvia have been conducted and the aim was to study the demographic and clinical data of patients with SSc in northeastern Europe country.MethodsThis study was conducted in two main Latvian hospitals for adults and includes patients with SSc who were consulted between 2016 and 2021.ResultsDuring the study period, 159 patients with SSc were consulted. The point prevalence on 1 January 2021 was 84.0 per million. Female to male ratio was 4.67:1, and highest gender ratio was observed in the age group 70–79-year (6.75:1). Antinuclear antibodies were present in 82.58% of patients, without gender difference. Centromere pattern was more frequently observed in females (40.19% vs. 19.04%), in contrast to speckled pattern (50.98% vs. 57.14%). At disease onset females tended to be younger (46.51 ± 13.52) than males (50.5 ± 16.64). Males had more diffuse cutaneous subtype, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension and esophageal dysmotility. More than half of patients received treatment with glucocorticoids at any point of the disease (68.31%), without gender difference.ConclusionsSystemic sclerosis is less common in Latvia than in other countries and regions. Due to its location, the data from Latvia are consistent with a north-south gradient in Europe. Gender ratio differences persisted in older age groups as well. Antinuclear antibodies presence did not differ between genders, but in female’s centromere pattern was much more likely to be present. Males had more severe disease course, but in both genders more than half of patients received treatment with GCs at any point of the disease.

Evaluation of Progression From Preclinical to Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease: Novel Use of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria as an Outcome Measure.

Our objective was to evaluate the development of a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) in undifferentiated and asymptomatic individuals with antinuclear antibodies (ANAs). We comparatively evaluated those who did and did not develop a SARD and fulfillment of classification criteria. We conducted a cohort study of undifferentiated and asymptomatic patients with ANAs who were assessed for the development of a SARD. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of a SARD over a two-year period. We assessed fulfillment of classification criteria. Risk ratios (RRs) were used to evaluate differences among those who did and did not progress to a SARD. We evaluated 207 asymptomatic ANA-positive or undifferentiated patients, of whom 23 (11%) progressed to a SARD, whereas 187 (89%) did not progress. Progressors developed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n = 11 [48%]), Sjögren disease (n = 5 [22%]), systemic sclerosis (n = 3 [13%]), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 1 [4%]), and from ANA-positive to undifferentiated connective tissue disease (n = 3 [13%]). Fever (RR 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-0.93) and antiphospholipid antibodies (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87-0.93) occurred less frequently, whereas arthritis (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.20-2.55) occurred more frequently in progressors. Progressors to SLE had arthritis (91%), whereas none developed delirium, psychosis, or nephritis. Among patients with SLE, 100% fulfilled the EULAR/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE criteria (sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 100%), whereas 73% fulfilled the 1997 ACR SLE criteria (sensitivity 81.8%, specificity 98.9%). Most undifferentiated/asymptomatic individuals with ANA do not progress to a SARD over a two-year period. SLE progressors appear to have mild disease in the short term. The EULAR/ACR SLE criteria have improved ability to identify those who develop SLE.

Impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria in Women with Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome during Pregnancy.

Background/Objectives: ACR/EULAR has recently developed new classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The present study aims to analyze the impact of these new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in a cohort of pregnant women with primary APS. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 93 consecutive pregnant women attending the Autoimmune Diseases Pregnancy Clinic, a multidisciplinary unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital, between 2005 and 2023. All of them fulfilled the Sydney classification criteria for APS. Women diagnosed with rheumatic autoimmune diseases other than APS were excluded. Results: Twenty-four out of ninety-three patients (25.8%) met the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria for APS. Patients who met the new classification criteria were very similar to those who did not, except for being younger (p < 0.001), and had a lower number of clinical pregnancies (p = 0.004). The obstetric domain was clearly underrepresented in women who fulfilled the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria (p < 0.001). Patients meeting the new classification criteria were primarily characterized by preterm births before 34 weeks due to severe placentation disorders (p = 0.004). Women with early and late fetal loss were significantly underrepresented (p < 0.0001 and 0.03, respectively). Nearly half of these patients had thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001). Serologically, these patients showed a higher frequency of persistent lupus anticoagulant (p = 0.02) and a lower frequency of IgM isotype antiphospholipid antibodies (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Almost three-quarters of the patients included in the study did not meet the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria. Most patients who could not be classified according to these new classification criteria were those with early and/or late fetal deaths, as well as patients carrying only IgM aCL/AB2GPI antibodies. The high specificity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, restricted to severe placentation disorders, may leave the majority of patients with obstetric APS out of the new classification criteria.

Treatment of Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease and the Risk of Malignancy

Treatment of Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease and the Risk of Malignancy