Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Research Articles

One type of graft for reconstruction of the ACL does not suit all patients based on their characteristics and sports: a scoping review.

The selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a topic of debate, taking into consideration patient characteristics, as well as the type and level of sports involvement. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate patient characteristics that might influence the selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PubMed and Scopus were searched to identify articles for inclusion. All included studies focused on one or more patient characteristics involved in the decision-making process regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft, including the hamstrings tendon (HT), patellar tendon (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT). Out of the 1,977 initial studies, 27 studies were included in this review. The BPTB graft seems to be the preferred choice in young patients, females, and athletes-especially those engaged in pivoting sports. The HT graft seems to be the preferred choice in less active and older patients, along with those involved in sports where knee extensors are vital. The HT graft is not preferable in patients with a small body height and graft diameter. Moreover, surgeon preferences were also of importance for graft selection. The success of a specific graft type in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is highly dependent on the patient's characteristics and type of sport. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, body height, graft diameter, and the patient's activity level should all be considered when choosing the appropriate graft type.

Quadriceps tendon size does not affect postoperative strength recovery following quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

ObjectiveThe influence of quadriceps tendon (QT) size on postoperative quadriceps strength following QT anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the relationship between QT morphology and postoperative quadriceps strength recovery following primary ACLR using a QT autograft. MethodsPatients who underwent primary ACLR using QT autograft from 2014 to 2022 followed by a postoperative isometric strength measurement between 5 and 8 months were retrospectively reviewed. Using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings, the anterior–posterior (A-P) thickness, medial–lateral (M-L) width, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the QT were measured. Postoperative residual CSA of QT was estimated based on the graft-harvest diameter. The quadriceps index (QI) was also calculated, which was determined by dividing the maximum isometric quadriceps torque on the involved side by the maximum quadriceps torque on the uninvolved side. Associations between the QI and QT morphology were assessed. Furthermore, multivariable logistic regression analysis with the addition of sex as a covariate was performed with the addition of each individual measure of QT morphology to determine the association with a QI ​≥80%. ResultsA total of 84 patients (mean age: 21.9 ​± ​7.3 years; 46 female) were included. Residual CSA showed a statistically significant positive correlation with the QI (r ​= ​0.221, p ​= ​0.043). There were no statistically significant correlations between QI and CSA, A-P thickness, or M-L width. Multivariable logistic analysis adjusting for sex demonstrated that each individual measure of QT morphology was not statistically significantly associated with a QI ​≥80%. ConclusionA statistically significant correlation between measures of preoperative QT size and postoperative quadriceps strength were not detected in patients undergoing primary QT autograft ACLR. A smaller residual QT CSA based on QT harvest diameter was weakly associated with decreased quadriceps strength 5–8 months postoperatively, but this association was not independent of sex. Future studies examining the impact of QT morphology on quadriceps strength at longer follow-up intervals are needed. Level of evidenceIV.

The Solo Anterior Cruciate Ligament Technique: Using an Articulated Arm Holder for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Without a Surgical Assistant

The Federal No Surprises Act was passed to avoid surprise out-of-network billing to patients, particularly after surgical procedures from independent third parties hired as assistants. This has resulted in a scarcity of “for-hire” surgical first assistants. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery is challenging to perform without an assistant. During arthroscopy, the leg must be manipulated simultaneously while performing surgery. This usually requires multiple hands and can be physically demanding. This Technical Note will describe the use of an articulated arm holder adapted to hold and manipulate a leg during ACL surgery without an assistant as well as the use of a self-retractor to aid in quadriceps tendon graft harvest and repair when performing a solo quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction.

Peroneus longus tendon autograft for one-stage revision acl reconstruction: mid-term results

Background. The results of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are usually worse than the primary ACLR. The positive outcome of the revision ACLR is significantly influenced by the following factors: anatomical position of bone tunnels, correct choice of graft, its preparation and fixation method. Equally important is to choose the accurate indications for additional extraarticular interventions. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of a peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft in one-stage revision ACL reconstruction and to compare the obtained data with the results of primary ACLR. Methods. The comparison was carried out between the RACL-PLT group (n = 29) and the PACL-HT group (n = 82), which underwent single-stage revision ACLR with a PLT autograft and primary ACLR with a hamstring tendons (HT) autograft, respectively. Subjective and objective evaluation was performed on the KOOS, IKDC, and Lysholm Knee scales. Also, in the RACL-PLT group, the position of the central entry points into the primary and revision tunnels was determined. Results. We observed no statistically significant differences during the objective assessment of knee joint stability between the groups (p0.999). During the subjective assessment on the KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm Knee scales, significantly higher results were obtained in the PACL-HT group (p0.001). The position of the central entry points into the revision tunnels corresponded to the normative values in all cases. Conclusions. The analysis of the use of a PLT autograft in revision ACLR, as well as the achievement of the anatomical position of the revision tunnels showed: 12 months after surgery, the results of an objective assessment between the revision and primary ACLR are comparable; the results of a subjective assessment are statistically significantly different. However, the differences in indicators do not reach a minimal clinically important difference.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Reconstruction: Systematic Review of Six-Strand Hamstring Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes

Introduction: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are a major concern in orthopedics, particularly affecting active individuals and often necessitating surgery. The incidence of ACL injuries is rising, especially in women, comprising half of knee joint injuries. These injuries, common in sports with pivoting actions, can lead to long-term joint issues like osteoarthritis. Advances in surgical methods and understanding of postoperative recovery are crucial for improving patient outcomes, with considerations for graft size, material, and reconstruction technique critical in the rehabilitation process. Material and Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS for studies from 2009 to 10 February 2024, focusing on “six-strand hamstring graft” outcomes in ACL reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were English publications on 6HS autografts’ biomechanical and clinical outcomes. Excluded were non-specific, BTB, or hybrid studies, and non-research articles. Out of 347 records, 9 were analyzed after rigorous screening and quality assessment. This review, emphasizing six-strand hamstring autografts, enriches orthopedic knowledge, particularly for ACL surgery. Results: This review evaluated studies on six-strand hamstring (6HS) autografts for ACL reconstruction, encompassing prospective, retrospective, and cadaveric studies with subjects ranging from 12 to 413. Findings indicate that 6HS autografts enhance knee stability and increase graft diameter, correlating with reduced graft failure rates and improved clinical outcomes, including high patient satisfaction and low re-injury rates. Rehabilitation varied, with recovery times quicker due to larger graft sizes, and most studies reported low complication rates, underscoring 6HS autografts’ efficacy in ACL surgery. Conclusions: Performing 6HS autografts in ACL reconstruction reveals that they offer improved knee stability and graft diameter, leading to better clinical outcomes. These autografts are associated with high patient satisfaction and low re-injury rates, suggesting their effectiveness in mimicking native ACL function and enhancing rehabilitation. However, research limitations highlight the need for further long-term, comprehensive studies.

Association of Spanish as a Primary Language With Retear Rates After Pediatric ACL Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common knee injuries in pediatric patients in the United States. The patient's primary spoken language may affect outcomes after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to identify differences in ACLR outcomes between patients whose primary, preferred spoken language was either English or Spanish. It was hypothesized that there would be a difference in retear rates between patients preferring English versus Spanish. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A retrospective cohort study was performed on pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent ACLR at a single institution. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preferred spoken language: English or Spanish. All patients underwent either hamstring tendon or bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft ACLR performed by the same surgeon with the same postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Linear regression, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine if outcomes, graft tear, revision surgery, and contralateral injury differed between groups. A total of 68 patients were identified: 33 patients whose preferred language was English and 35 patients whose preferred language was Spanish. The overall mean age of the patients was 16.4 ± 1.4 years (range, 13.2-20.5 years), and the mean follow-up time was 3.26 ± 1.98 years (range, 0.53-8.13 years). Patients who preferred Spanish were more likely than those who preferred English to experience graft tears requiring revision surgery after ACLR (P = .02; odds ratio [OR] = 5.81; adjusted OR = 1.94), at a tear rate of 14.3%. Patients who preferred to speak Spanish experienced higher graft tear rates when compared with patients who preferred speaking English, even after adjusting for sex, sport played, graft type, type of insurance, and time to surgery.

GRAFTS COMPARISON BETWEEN QUADRICEPS TENDON AUTOGRAFT VS. ALLOGRAFT FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REVISIOON RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic surgeries performed on active people in the world. One of the most important surgical decisions is graft type for use in the reconstruction. Recently, the quadriceps tendon has gained popularity for use as a graft source for ACL reconstruction. The graft choice is broadly between an autograft or allograft. This review aims to understand the current concepts in graft comparison between quadriceps tendon autograft vs. allograft for anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction. Methods: This literature review study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and adhered to a structured review protocol. The author searched the PubMed, ScienceDirect, and British Medical Journal databases. The authors comparing selected publications reporting patient outcomes with all types of reviews or descriptions of ACL revision reconstruction and its graft being used or other related subjects. Published in English is included. The author then formulates a synthesis to support the previously determined research objectives. Results: ACL reconstruction with partial thickness soft tissue quadriceps tendon graft is a reliable option. Where there are differences in the failure rates of ACL reconstructions between allografts and autografts, these can mostly be explained by irradiated grafts. Giving sufficient radiation to achieve sterility will likely weaken grafts and make them more likely to fail; therefore, irradiating grafts is not recommended. The evidence shows no significant differences in clinical effectiveness between autografts and non-irradiated allografts. Failure rates with both grafts are now low. Discussion: The primary goals of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction do not vary considerably based on graft type and emphasize: (1) restoration of the full range of motion, (2) normalization of quadriceps strength, (3) improvement of overall lower extremity muscle strength, and (4) re-training of movement patterns to return to pre-injury sports participation while decreasing injury risk. Achieving full motion and quadriceps strength contributes to a rapid return to normal weight bearing, gait, and activities of daily living. In the setting of revision ACL reconstruction, there are various considerations regarding graft choice due to tunnel size or position, previous usage of other grafts, and reconstructions in the other leg, which may mean that allografts would be preferred to autografts. The other population not covered sufficiently in the literature is the elite sprinting athlete, where autograft choices may be influenced by the effect of graft harvesting on their sport. However, in most cases, allograft ACL reconstruction with non-irradiated grafts is as safe but more expensive than autograft ACL reconstruction, which is preferred as it is more cost-effective. Conclusion: There is little difference in the results of ACL reconstruction with autografts or non-irradiated allografts, with any advantage being with autografts. The cost is higher with allografts. So if autografts are available, allografts are not cost-effective.

Comparative effectiveness of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autografts versus hamstring tendon (HT) autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive systematic review and meta analysis

The hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is currently the most widely utilised autograft option for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, recent studies endorse the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft as a viable alternative. To evaluate this, we systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of PLT against HT autografts. Our search encompassed Cochrane, Embase, OVID, PubMed, and Scopus databases for RCTs comparing outcomes of PLT and HT autografts in ACL reconstruction. Primary outcomes included Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, while secondary outcomes involved American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, graft diameters and donor-site complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration) and heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. 683 patients from 6 RCTs were included, with 338 (49.5%) patients treated with PLT autografts. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 30 months. Despite lower preoperative Lysholm scores in the PLT group, no significant differences were observed at 6 and 12 months. Although preoperative and 6-month IKDC scores were lower in the PLT group, no significant differences were found at 12 and 24 months. AOFAS scores showed no significant preoperative difference, but slightly lower scores were noted in the PLT group at 12 or 24 months. There was no significant difference in graft diameter, while donor-site complications were fewer in the PLT group. In summary, the PLT autograft is a promising and non-inferior alternative to the HT autograft, demonstrating equivalent outcomes in patient-reported knee and ankle metrics, comparable graft diameters and fewer donor-site complications.

'Real world' clinical implementation of blood flow restriction therapy does not increase quadriceps strength after quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction.

To retrospectively compare strength outcomes of individuals undergoing postoperative rehabilitation following quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without blood flow restriction therapy. A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing ACLR with QT autograft with a minimum of two quantitative postoperative isometric strength assessments via an electromechanical dynamometer (Biodex) was included. Demographics, surgical variables and strength measurement outcomes were compared between patients undergoing blood flow restriction therapy as part of postoperative rehabilitation versus those who did not. Eighty-one (81) patients met the inclusion criteria. No differences were found in demographic and surgical characteristics between those who received blood flow restriction compared with those who did not. While both groups had improvements in quadriceps peak torque and limb symmetry index (LSI; defined as peak torque of the operative limb divided by the peak torque of the nonoperative limb) over the study period, the blood flow restriction group had significantly lower mean peak torque of the operative limb at first Biodex strength measurement (95.6 vs. 111.2 Nm; p = 0.03). Additionally, the blood flow restriction group had a significantly lower mean LSI than those with no blood flow restriction at the second Biodex measurement timepoint (81% vs. 90%; p = 0.02). No other significant differences were found between the strength outcomes measured. Results of this study show that the 'real world' clinical implementation of blood flow restriction therapy to the postoperative rehabilitation protocol following QT autograft ACLR did not result in an increase in absolute or longitudinal changes in quadriceps strength measurements. A better understanding and standardisation of the use of blood flow restriction therapy in the rehabilitation setting is necessary to delineate the true effects of this modality on strength recovery after QT autograft ACLR. Level III.

Patient Interest in Quadriceps Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Increasing Over Other Autograft Options: A 12-Year Google Trends Analysis

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to use Google trends to explore differences in public interest among types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autografts, specifically quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon, and hamstring tendon autografts between 2008 and 2019. MethodsData were obtained by querying Google Trends for key terms and phrases for online search data ranging from January 2008 to December 2019. Relative search volumes were created based on searches related to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with comparative analysis generated for search terms related to quadriceps ACL, patellar tendon ACL, and hamstring ACL autografts. Statistical analysis included linear regression analysis, comparison of quarterly search volume trends over time, and comparison of cumulative annual search volumes for 2008 versus 2019. ResultsLinear models for respective search terms terms were statistically significant for the quadriceps (p<0.001) and patellar (p 0.007) tendon autograft groups, but not the hamstring group (p 0.129). The quadriceps autograft group demonstrated a 12-year search volume trend change of 0.56, which was significantly greater than the hamstring (0.07; p <0.001) and patellar tendon (0.168; p<0.001) groups. There was no significant difference in the trend change between hamstring and patellar tendon groups (p 0.20). Percent change in cumulative relative annual search volumes between 2008 and 2019 was 112% for the quadriceps tendon group, 12.9% for the hamstring group, and 18.6% for the patellar tendon group. ConclusionThis study indicates a consistently increasing public interest in quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction. The quadriceps autograft group demonstrated a significantly greater 12-year online search volume trend, greater linear correlation, and larger percent change between 2008 and 2019 when compared to patellar tendon or hamstring autograft groups.

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation: Safe Results Based on Minimum 2-Year Follow-up MRI.

The potential intra-articular effects of ≥1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with independent suture tape augmentation (STA) are not fully understood. To investigate whether incorporating suture tape in an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) ACLR leads to satisfactory patient outcomes while having no intra-articular side effects as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Included were 25 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years (95% CI, 17.3-22.5 years) who underwent QTA ACLR with STA between 2016 and 2019. All patients underwent MRI at ≥1 year postoperatively and had at least a 2-year follow-up (mean, 28 months [95% CI, 26.5-29.5 months]) that included physical examination with anterior laxity testing with KT-1000 arthrometer, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). At the final follow-up, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for applicable PROMs were applied to each patient. Postoperative graft and joint integrity were assessed using the Howell classification and the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) joint effusion/synovitis grade. The Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square or the Fisher exact test for categorical variables were used for statistical analyses. The MRI assessment of the grafts demonstrated intact grafts in all patients. Overall, 96% of patients demonstrated grades 0 or 1 MOAKS for joint effusion/synovitis. All patient outcomes significantly improved from preoperatively to the final follow-up (P < .001), except for the Marx score, which decreased significantly (14.2 [95% CI, 12.7-15.8] vs 9.72 [95% CI, 7.3-12.2]; P = .0014). At least 68% of the patients achieved the MCID threshold, and 92% achieved the PASS threshold for all applicable PROMs. QTA ACLR with STA did not demonstrate adverse intra-articular changes on MRI at ≥1 year postoperatively. In addition, STA did not appear to negatively affect PROMs.

Primary All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation Resulted in Satisfactory Patient Outcomes and a Low Graft Failure Rate in High School and Collegiate Athletes

To evaluate ≥2-year patient outcomes after primary all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft (ASTQ) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape augmentation (STA) in skeletally mature high school and collegiate athletes. All high school and collegiate athletes who underwent primary ASTQ ACLR with STA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were administered validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) pre- and postoperatively. The minimal clinically important difference was calculated for each PROM based on this study population and applied to the individual patient. Return to sport, subsequent surgical intervention including contralateral ACLR, and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements for knee laxity were collected. Complications were assessed by physical examination, radiologic studies, or obtained via telephone. In total, 60 patients were included in the final data analysis, with a mean age of 16.8 years (95% confidence interval 13-23) and mean final follow-up of 37.1 months (95% confidence interval 33.1-41.1). Twelve patients (20%) required subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral knee, which included 7 patients having a subsequent meniscal procedure and 3 patients who underwent arthrolysis. None sustained a graft failure, and 6 patients sustained a contralateral ACL injury necessitating surgery. All PROMs improved at the final follow-up (P < .001). In addition, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements significantly improved postoperatively at 1-year clinical follow-up (P < .001). Most patients obtained the minimal clinically important difference thresholds for each PROM at the final follow-up. There were 48 patients (80%) who participated in pivoting sports. The return-to-sport rate at same level was 54 patients (90%), with 6 patients (10%) not returning to the same level because of graduation. ASTQ ACLR with STA in a young athletic patient population may result in a low graft failure rate while maintaining satisfactory patient outcomes at short-term follow-up, including a return to sport at the same level of 90%. Level IV, retrospective case series.

Intralimb Coordination Pattern of the Lower Limbs in Male Athletes With Allograft and Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction During Landing

Intralimb Coordination Pattern of the Lower Limbs in Male Athletes With Allograft and Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction During Landing

Analysis of Changing Practice Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Single-Institution Database Analysis

PurposeThis study sought to identify trends in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), including graft choice, femoral tunnel drilling, and augmentation techniques, and to assess how various surgeon factors impact these trends. MethodsA retrospective review of primary ACLR performed between 2014 and 2022 was performed using a multi-centered institutional database. Patient demographics, graft type, femoral drilling technique, use of extra-articular tenodesis, and use of suture augmentation were recorded from the medical record. Surgeon fellowship training (sports-trained versus non-sports-trained), experience (high: minimum 15 years in practice), and volume (high: minimum 15 ACLR per year) were used to stratify technique utilization. Z-test for proportions compared categorical variables. Pearson correlation analyses identified trends and assessed statistical significance, defined as a p-value less than 0.05. ResultsOur cohort consisted of 2,032 ACLR performed on 2,006 patients. The average patient age was 28.3 +/- 11.6 years, with more procedures performed on males (67.3%). The average surgeon experience was 19.7 +/- 11.4 years, with an average annual procedural volume of 4.0 +/- 5.4. Most surgeons were sports-trained (55, 64.7%), high experience (44, 57.1%), and low-volume (80, 94.1%). There were increasing annual proportion of ACLR performed by sports-trained (R=0.748, p=0.020) and low experience (R=0.940, p<0.001) surgeons. Autograft reconstructions were most often performed by sports-trained (71.2%), low experience (66.1%), and high-volume (76.9%) surgeons. There was an increasing proportion of autograft ACLR that utilized QT among sports-trained (R=0.739, p=0.023), high experience (R=0.768, p=0.016), and low-volume (R=0.785, p=0.012). Independent drilling (ID) techniques were used in an increasing proportion of ACLR performed by non-sports-trained (R=0.860, p=0.003) and high-volume surgeons (R=0.864, p=0.003). Augmentation of ACLR with concomitant suture augmentation (24, 1.2%) or extra-articular tenodesis (6, 0.3%) was rarely performed ConclusionIn our multi-centered institution, the QT autograft has been increasingly utilized in ACLR by sports-trained, low volume, and high experience surgeons, ID techniques have been increasingly utilized by non-sports-trained and high-volume surgeons Clinical RelevanceSurgeons must stay current with literature that affects their procedures to ensure that evidence-based medicine is being practiced.

Increased risk for early revision with quadriceps graft compared with patellar tendon graft in primary ACL reconstructions.

Bone patella-tendon bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are the most used grafts in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLR) in Norway. Quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has gained more popularity during the past years. The purpose of this study is to compare revision rates and patient-reported outcomes of primary QT with BPTB and HT autograft ACL reconstructions in Norway at 2-year follow-up. It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in 2-year revision rates between all three autografts. Data included primary ACLR without concomitant ligament surgeries, registered in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register from 2004 through 2021. Revision rates at 2 years were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) for revision were estimated using multivariable Cox regression analysis with revision within 2 years as endpoint. Mean change in patient-reported outcome was recordedpreoperatively and at 2 years through the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subcategories 'Sport' and 'Quality of Life' was measured for patients that were not revised and analysed with multiple linear regression. A total of 24,790 primary ACLRs were identified, 10,924 with BPTB, 13,263 with HT and 603 with a QT graft. Patients in the QT group were younger (23.5 years), more of them were women (58.2%) and over 50% had surgery <3 months after injury. The QT group had the highest prevalence of meniscal injuries (61.9%). Revision estimates at 2-years were 3.6%, 2.5% and 1.2% for QT, HT and BPTB, respectively (p < 0.001). In a Cox regression analysis with QT as reference, BPTB had a lower risk of revision (HR 0.4, 95% Cl 0.2-0.7, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the revision risk between QT and HT (HR 1.1, 95% Cl 0.7-1.8, n.s.). The two most common reported reasons for revision were: traumatic graft rupture and nontraumatic graft failure. There were no differences between the groups in change of KOOS in subcategories 'Sport' and 'Quality of Life' at 2-years follow-up. The 2-year risk of revision after ACLR with QT was higher than BPTB and similar to HT. No difference was found between the groups in patient-reported outcomes. This study provides valuable insights for both surgeons and patients when making decisions about the choice of autografts in primary ACL reconstructions. Level II.

Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews of comparative studies in autograft-based anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the AMSTAR-2 tool: A systematic umbrella review.

There remains a lack of consensus around autograft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), though there is a large body of overlapping systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Systematic reviews and their methodological quality were aimed to be further assessed, using a validated tool known as assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR-2). MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL were searched from inception to 23 April 2023 for systematic reviews (with/without meta-analysis) comparing primary ACLR autografts. A final quality rating from AMSTAR-2 was provided for each study ('critically low', 'low', 'moderate' or 'high' quality). Correlational analyses were conducted for ratings in relation to study characteristics. Two thousand five hundred and ninety-eight studies were screened, and 50 studies were ultimately included. Twenty-four studies (48%) were rated as 'critically low', 17 (34%) as 'low', seven (14%) as 'moderate' and two (4%) as 'high' quality. The least followed domains were reporting on sources of funding (1/50 studies), the impact of risk of bias on results of meta-analyses (11/36 studies) and publication bias (17/36 studies). There was a significant increase in the frequency of studies graded as 'moderate' compared to 'low' or 'critically low' quality over time (p = 0.020). The methodological quality of systematic reviews comparing autografts in ACLR is low, with many studies being rated lower due to commonly absent aspects of systematic review methodology such as investigating sources of funding and publication bias. More recent studies were generally more likely to be of higher quality. Authors are advised to consult AMSTAR-2 prior to conducting systematic reviews in ACLR. Level IV.

The Correlation Between Graft Size and Graft Failure in Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Previous studies have investigated various factors that contribute to graft failure in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, there is debate about the potential advantages of increasing graft diameters beyond 8 mm. In this retrospective cohort study (level of evidence III), we investigated whether increasing graft sizes beyond 8 mm diameter showed any advantages in reducing the risk ofgraft failure. We utilized univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard (PH) regression models to compare the risk of failure in the different patient groups. Mutual adjustment was performed for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and graft strands.Graft sizes ranging between 8 and 10 mm were assessed for their association with graft failure, alongside examining the impact of graft strands, age, and BMI on graft failure. A total of 487 patients underwent hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. Our analysis indicated that among patients undergoing hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction, the risk of graft failure was 1.64 times higher for patients with a graft size between 8.5 and 9 mm (95% CI 0.36-7.43, p=0.483) and 2.19 times higher for patients with a graft size between 9.5 and 10.5 mm (95% CI 0.42-11.31, p=0.384) compared to those with an 8 mm graft. However, there was weak evidence against the null hypothesis. Conclusion: These findings suggest that there is no benefit to increasing graft sizes past 8 mm and that other factors, like surgical technique, should be considered when assessing the risk of graft failure in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.

Risk of Revision and Reoperation After Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction Compared With Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Autografts in a US Cohort of 21,973 Patients

Background: The use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts has increased in the past 10 years. However, there remains a dearth of large studies examining the effects of graft selection on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) that includes QT grafts. Purpose: To evaluate the risk of subsequent surgical outcomes, including revision and reoperation, for a large cohort of patients with primary ACLR according to autograft selection. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Data from a US health care system ACLR registry were used to conduct a cohort study. Primary isolated autograft ACLRs were identified (2012-2021). The exposure of interest was autograft type: QT, bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision (defined as a subsequent surgery where removal and replacement of the original graft for noninfectious reasons was required) and risk of aseptic reoperation (defined as any subsequent surgery for noninfectious reasons where the graft was left intact) according to autograft selection. Results: The study sample comprised 21,973 ACLRs performed by 290 surgeons at 53 hospitals. QT, BPTB, and HT autografts were used in 1103 (5.0%), 9519 (43.3%), and 11,351 (51.7%) ACLRs, respectively. In adjusted models, no significant differences were observed in revision risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.60-1.89; P = .837) or reoperation risk (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.70-1.43; P = .993) within 4 years of follow-up when comparing QT ACLR with BPTB ACLR. Additionally, no differences in 4-year revision (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.34-1.12; P = .111) or reoperation (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.85-1.80; P = .262) risks were observed when comparing QT ACLR with HT ACLR. HT ACLRs were noted to have a higher risk of revision (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.25-1.84; P < .001) compared with BPTB ACLRs but a lower risk of reoperation (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; P = .024). Conclusion: In this large multicenter study using data from an ACLR registry, the authors found no difference in the risk of revision or reoperation when QT was compared with BPTB or HT autograft with the numbers available, but they did find a 1.5 times higher risk of revision when HT autograft was compared with BPTB autograft. Surgeons may use this information when choosing the appropriate graft for ACLR in their patients.

Radiographic Investigation of Coronal Plane and Patellar Height and Changes Following Tibial Deflection Osteotomy for Correction of Tibial Slope in Combination With ACL Reconstruction

Background: A tibial deflexion osteotomy (TDO) is performed to decrease the sagittal tibial slope to reduce the relative risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) graft failure. Given that coronal plane osteotomies can cause consequential changes in the sagittal plane to patellar height and tibial slope, potential changes to coronal plane alignment and patellar height can result after a sagittal plane osteotomy. Purpose: To compare preoperative and postoperative coronal plane alignment after TDO, as well as to analyze the effect of the osteotomy on patellar height. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study was conducted on a consecutive series of patients with primary and revision ACLR with concomitant TDO between 2011 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were 1-stage autograft ACLR combined with supratubercular TDO with pre- and 3 months postoperative radiographs of sufficient quality. Indications for TDO were anterior instability requiring ACL revision surgery and a posterior tibial slope (PTS) >9° or a PTS >14° in the primary ACL surgery patients. Anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs were reviewed, and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), PTS, Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), and modified Insall-Salvati ratio were measured directly from the radiographs by 2 independent reviewers. Results: A total of 68 patients were included in this study. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were performed 1 month before and 3 months after surgery, respectively. There was a significant increase in the mean MPTA of 0.95° varus (SD, 2.1°; range, increase of 4.23° valgus to increase of 7.74° varus; P < .01), a decreased PTS of 8.86° (SD, 3.03°; P < .01), and an increased CDI of 0.08 (range, decrease of 0.27 to increase of 0.64) (P < .01; SD, 0.17) in patients undergoing TDO. Insall-Salvati ratio measurements showed no difference. There was good intra- and interobserver reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.97 and 0.91 for MPTA, 0.97 and 0.87 for PTS, 0.87 and 0.93 for CDI, and 0.88 and 0.76 the Insall-Salvati ratio. Conclusion: This study, the largest series on TDO for ACLR, demonstrates that the TDO can be performed safely without large changes to coronal alignment or patellar height. The tibial slope was reduced by a mean of 8.86° (range, 2.3°-11.5°; P < .01). The TDO produces a small statistically significant change to coronal alignment, inducing a mean increased varus of <1° and an increased patellar height of 0.1 CDI. Therefore, TDO can be performed safely without dramatic changes to coronal alignment or patellar height, this study highlights technical aspects to minimize iatrogenic varus.

Low Preoperative Brief Resilience Scale Scores Are Associated With Inferior Preoperative and Short-Term Postoperative Patient Outcomes Following Primary Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

To assess preoperative Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) scores as they relate to postoperative patient outcomes following primary autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). All patients who underwent primary autograft ACLR from 2016 to 2021 and had a patient-reported follow-up of 1 year and a clinical follow-up of 6 months were included in final data analysis. Patients completed validated PROMs pre- and postoperatively. All patients were objectively assessed with range of motion (ROM) and KT-1000 arthrometer testing. Return to sport (RTS) data were obtained for all applicable patients. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on ± ½ the standard deviation for the mean preoperative BRS score. In total, 170 patients who underwent primary autograft ACLR with a mean age of 20.1 years (range, 13-57 years) and a mean final follow-up time of 2.9 years (range, 1.0-5.8 years) were included in the final analysis. The mean preoperative BRS scores for the high-resilience (HR, n= 67), average-resilience (AR, n= 42), and low-resilience (LR, n= 61) groups were 28.1 (95% CI, 27.8-28.9), 24.5 (95% CI, 24.3-24.6), and 21.1 (95% CI, 20.5-21.7), respectively (P < .001). The HR group demonstrated significantly higher preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared to the AR and LR groups, with more differences seen with the LR group. The HR group demonstrated better knee extension in postoperative month 3 compared to the LR group (0.6° [95% CI, -1.2° to 0.1°] vs -2.3° [95% CI, -3.3° to -1.3°], P= .006). The HR group demonstrated a faster RTS time compared to the LR group (6.4 months [95% CI, 6.1-6.7] vs 7.6 months [95% CI, 7.1-8.1], P= .002). No differences were seen in RTS rate, knee flexion, or KT-1000 arthrometer measurements between the 3 groups. Low preoperative BRS scores were associated with inferior PROMs preoperatively and in the short-term postoperative period compared to those with higher preoperative BRS scores. Additionally, patients with lower preoperative BRS scores demonstrated a higher degree of knee extension loss 3 months postoperatively as well as a slower RTS. Level III, retrospective cohort study.