Authority Of Commission Research Articles

Authority of Commission of Corruption Eradication in Prosecution of Money Laundering

Commission of Corruption Eradication is an institution that is given attributive authority by Law Number 30 of 2002 and Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning Commission of Corruption Eradicati on to carry out law enforcement by investigating and prosecuting corruption offence. The authority of this commission in carrying out the law enforcement must be based on statutory regulation which is a form of criminal law policy. However, in the practice of law occur ed , the commission prosecutes several cases of money laundering in which the act is not explicitly regulated by law. So that, some of money laundering offences prosecuted by the commission find pros and cons among legal experts, even a dissenting opinion in the Panel of Judges who decide the case. It has become one of legal problems for the commission which must be a serious concern for the government. So that it becomes interested in studying about whether the legal problems Commission of Corruption Eradication in the prosecution of Money Laundering and how the authority Commission of Corruption Eradication in prosecuting cases of Money Laundering Criminal Acts? This research employed normative juridical legal research, which focused on the library research by analyzing the related legal regulations and literatures. The results showed that the legal issue regarding the authority of the commission arises when the provisions require this commission coordinating with the Prosecutor Office when prosecuting, as stipulated in Article 12A of Law Number 19 of 2019 Concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Commission of Corruption Eradication, which is able to eliminate the independence of the Commission of Corruption Eradication in establishing the law enforcement.

Criminal law policy about KPK authorities in the perspective of criminal action in corruption in Indonesia

Criminal law policy of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission the authority associated with the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is the state agency that are unconstitutional, although not spelled out in the state constitution is the 1945 Constitution. Corruption eradication commission (KPK) was formed to look at the nature of the corruption itself is an extraordinary crime, so it requires an independent institution to fight corruption in Indonesia. Background The Commission is not due to the formation of the constitutional design rigidly interpreted, but rather incidental issues in the country and the common will of the people of Indonesia to combat corruption. Position of the Commission as a state agency is independent and free from the influence of any power, it is meant for combating corruption Commission did not get the intervention of any party. The establishment of the Commission was also a response to the ineffectiveness of the law enforcement agency performance so far in combating corruption, which impressed protracted in handling even indicated there was an element of corruption in the handling of his case. The authority granted by the Act prosecution to the Commission under the authority of the legitimate .The authority of the Commission is constitutional, it is reinforced by a number of decisions of the Supreme constitution..

Case Concerning Sovereignty over Certain Frontier Land (Belgium/Netherlands).

State territory — In general — Acquisition of territorial sovereignty — Occupation — Prescription — Acts of sovereignty as basis for claim to sovereignty in derogation of title established by treaty — Effective, notorious and peaceful possession — Possession in good faith and animus domini — Principle of uti possidetis — Plots of frontier land — Boundary Convention between Belgium and the Netherlands, 1843 — Subsequent acts by Netherlands authorities — Relevance of routine and administrative nature of acts — Relevance of absence of protest by Belgium Government.Treaties — Operation of — Conditions of validity of — Mistake — Effect of — Whether affecting validity of treaty as a whole or only of provision containing error — Burden of proof — Evidence required — Effect of express proviso relating to errors — Comparison of texts of documents relating to same subject — matter — Possibility of error in copying — Relevance of intention of Parties to treaty — Relevance of surrounding circumstances — Effect of failure to challenge relevant treaty provision by Party now seeking to plead mistake — Relevance of length of time treaty in existence and unchallenged — Effect of uncertainty and unresolved discrepancy — Effective and peaceful possession of dispute territory as supplementary evidence of mistake — Boundary Convention, 1843, between Belgium and the Netherlands.Treaties — Conclusion of — Ratification — Effect of unratified treaty — Treaty ceding land — Whether evidence that title to land is in ceding State — Effect of admission made in course of negotiation.Treaties — Interpretation of — Rules of — Boundary Convention — Examination of minutes of boundary commission — Belgian — Netherlands Boundary Convention, 1843.Treaties — Special kinds of — Boundary Convention — Interpretation of — Mixed Boundary Commission set up by Convention — Authority of Commission to delimit territory — Effect of resolution of Commission — Reference in Boundary Convention to earlier Treaty between same Parties — Two Treaties read together — Common intention of Parties — Boundary Convention between Belgium and the Netherlands, 1834 — Treaty of London determining boundaries between Belgium and the Netherlands, 1839.Arbitration — Evidence — Documentary evidence — Communal Minute in nature of treaty — Effect of non — production of copy by one Party — Authority of only existing copy — Discrepancy between texts of two Minutes — Original text and transcribed text — Which must prevail.Disputes — Negotiation — Proposals made in course of — No agreement reached — Evidentiary value of proposals in later dispute between same Parties — Admission made during negotiations — Whether Party making admission may later challenge it.State territory — Parts of — Boundaries — Land boundaries — Determination of — Enclosed areas — Operation of boundary convention — Principle of uti possidetis — Relevance of maps — Examination of work of boundary commission — Belgian-Netherlands Boundary Convention, 1843.

Interstate Commerce Commission. Authority of Commission to Condition Approval of Proposed Railroad Lease upon Acceptance of Provisions to Protect Adversely Affected Employees

Interstate Commerce Commission. Authority of Commission to Condition Approval of Proposed Railroad Lease upon Acceptance of Provisions to Protect Adversely Affected Employees