Australian Childhood Immunisation Register Research Articles

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and routine childhood vaccinations – a self-controlled case series

ABSTRACT Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an autoimmune, central nervous system demyelinating disorder that follows antecedent immunologic challenges, such as infection or vaccination. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between routine childhood vaccinations and ADEM. Children under 7 years of age admitted to the two tertiary level pediatric hospitals in Victoria, Australia with ADEM from 2000–2015 had their clinical information linked to vaccination records from the Australian Childhood Immunization Register. Chart review was undertaken utilizing the Brighton Collaboration ADEM criteria. The self-controlled case-series (SCCS) methodology was employed to determine the relative incidences of ADEM post-vaccination in two risk intervals: 5–28 days and 2–42 days. Forty-six cases were eligible for SCCS analysis with a median age of 3.2 years. Of the forty-six cases, three were vaccine proximate cases and received vaccinations 23, 25 and 28 days before ADEM onset. Two vaccine proximate cases received their 4-year-old scheduled vaccinations (MMR and DTPa-IPV) and one vaccine proximate case the 1-year old scheduled vaccinations (MMR and Hib-MenC). The relative incidence of ADEM during the narrow and broad risk intervals were 1.041 (95% CI 0.323–3.356, p = 0.946) and 0.585 (95% CI 0.182–1.886, p = 0.370) respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not yield any substantial deviations. These results do not provide evidence of an association between vaccinations routinely provided to children aged under 7 years in Australia and the incidence of ADEM. However, these results should be interpreted with caution as the number of ADEM cases identified was limited and further research is warranted.

Consent to Data Linkage in LSAC

IntroductionLinking the existing longitudinal data assets with administrative datasets provide the opportunity to transform longitudinal data into valuable assets to inform research and policy development.
 Objectives and ApproachThis paper will focus on Growing Up in Australia: The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) data linkage landscape and consents which are invaluable for the development of evidence-based health-social-economic policies.
 ResultsLSAC is Australia’s first nationally-representative longitudinal study of child development. Since 2004, two cohorts of 5,000 children and their parents have been interviewed every two years (B (baby) cohort and K (kindergarten) cohort). Over the years, multiple data linkage has been undertaken based on either parental consent or study child consent.
 In 2004 parents were asked to consent on behalf of the study child to link Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)/Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (RPBS) and Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) administrative data to LSAC. The consent rate was 93% was for MBS, PBS and ACIR. Nearly 90% of B cohort parents provided consent to link Australian Early Development Census (AEDC)/National
 Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) and 95.4% of K cohort parents provided consent to link NAPLAN.Then ten years later, children in the K cohort were asked to consent to MBS/PBS and income-support administrative data. The rates were 86.6% for MBS, 85.4% for PBS and 81.2% for income-support administrative data. Parental consent to link their MBS, PBS and income-support administrative data was also sought and these rates varied between 60% to 88%.
 Conclusion/ImplicationsThe discussion will focus on differences in consent rates by time of consent, consenting individual and type of administrative data to be linked. Challenges and considerations that researches should be aware of when designing the linkage consent methodology will also be discussed.

Vaccine sentiments and under-vaccination: Attitudes and behaviour around Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine (MMR) in an Australian cohort

ObjectiveThe study aimed to examine the consistency in factors associated with attitudes towards vaccination and MMR vaccination status. MethodsUsing the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children matched with the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register, 4,779 children were included from 2004–2005 to 2010–11. Different MMR vaccine dosages and general attitude towards vaccination were modelled individually with multinomial logit regressions, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and health related factors of the children and their primary carers. ResultsThe group with non-vaccination and negative attitudes was characterised by more siblings and older parents; the group with under-vaccination but positive attitudes was characterised by younger parental age; and the group with under-vaccination and neutral attitudes was characterised by less socioeconomically advantaged areas. The presence of parental medical condition(s), being private or public renters, and higher parental education were associated with under-vaccination but not with attitudes towards vaccination, whilst parental religion was associated with attitudes towards vaccination but not reflected in the vaccine uptake. ConclusionsVaccine attitudes were largely consistent with MRR vaccine outcomes. However, there was variation in the associations of factors with vaccine attitudes and uptake. The results have implications for different policy designs that target subgroups with consistent or inconsistent vaccination attitudes and behaviour. Parents with intentional and unintentional under-vaccination are of policy concern and require different policy solutions.

Vaccinations Do Not Increase Arthritis Flares in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Study of the Relationship between Routine Childhood Vaccinations on the Australian Immunisation Schedule and Arthritis Activity in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Background Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a collective term for a group of inflammatory conditions of uncertain origin, which causes chronic arthritis in one or more joints. The clinical course of JIA is characterised by episodes of increased activity, termed flares. Vaccinations have previously been proposed as a “trigger” for some flares, although evidence supporting this is scant. Objective To explore whether routine childhood vaccinations are associated with an increased risk of flares of arthritis activity in children with JIA. Methods Patients aged below 6 years with a diagnosis of JIA were recruited from the Rheumatology Clinical Database at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, from 1 January 2010 to 30 April 2016. Patient immunisation status was cross-checked with the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR). The self-controlled case series methodology (Rowhani-Rahbar et al., 2012) was applied to determine whether the risk of arthritis flares in the three months following immunisation was greater than the baseline risk for each patient. Results 138 patients were included in the study. 32 arthritis flares occurred in the 90 days following immunisation. The risk of arthritis flares during the 90 days following immunisation was reduced compared with patients' baseline risk (RR 0.59 (95% CI 0.39-0.89, p = 0.012)). Conclusion Routine childhood immunisations were not associated with arthritis flare onset in patients with JIA. The risk of arthritis flares in the 90 days following vaccination was lower than the baseline risk. In the context of COVID19, vaccination will not increase interaction with the healthcare system beyond the immunisation encounter.

Improving the accuracy of ACIR data and increasing vaccination rates

Immunisation at the earliest appropriate age and high levels of vaccine coverage at milestone ages are important in preventing the spread of vaccine-preventable diseases. At the Central Coast Public Health Unit, the authors sought to determine if follow-up of children said by the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) to be overdue for vaccination improved both of these factors. In a quality improvement activity, monthly ACIR lists of overdue Central Coast children aged 9 to 10 months of age were examined. The study alternated three months of intervention with three months of no intervention. The intervention was designed to find evidence of vaccination, first from the last known provider, and then if this was unsuccessful, from the parent. If no information was available, a letter was sent to the parents. If the child was indeed vaccinated, the register was updated. If the child was missing any vaccinations, the parent(s) were encouraged to complete the schedule. On reviewing routinely-published quarterly ACIR data at three-monthly intervals for 24 months after the intervention (or non-intervention), timeliness of vaccination improved in the intervention cohort. Central Coast fully vaccinated rates diverged from NSW rates during the study. In addition, the ACIR quarters that contained two out of three months of intervention rather than one out of three months of intervention had the highest rates of fully vaccinated children. The authors concluded that the intervention improved both timeliness of vaccination and the proportion of fully vaccinated children.

Process trumps potential public good: better vaccine safety through linked cross‐jurisdictional immunisation data in Australia

Objective:To provide insights into complexities of seeking access to state and federal cross‐jurisdictional data for linkage with the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR). We provide recommendations for improving access and receipt of linked datasets involving Australian Government‐administered data. Methods:We describe requirements for linking eleven federal and state data sources to establish a national linked dataset for safety evaluation of vaccines. The required data linkage methodology for integrating cross‐jurisdictional data sources is also described. Results:Extensive negotiation was required with 18 different agencies for 21 separate authorisations and 12 ethics approvals. Three variations of the ‘best practice’ linkage model were implemented. Australian Government approval requests spanned nearly four years from initial request for data, with a further year before ACIR data transfer to the linkage agency. Conclusions:Integration of immunisation registers with other data collections is achievable in Australia but infeasible for routine and rapid identification of vaccine safety concerns. Lengthy authorisation requirements, convoluted disparate application processes and inconsistencies in data supplied all contribute to delayed data availability. Implications for public health:Delayed data access for safety surveillance prevents timely epidemiological reviews. Poor responsiveness to safety concerns may erode public confidence, compromising effectiveness of vaccination programs through reduced participation.

Immunisation coverage annual report, 2015

This 9th annual immunisation coverage report shows data for 2015 derived from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register and the National Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Program Register. This report includes coverage data for ‘fully immunised’ and by individual vaccines at standard age milestones and timeliness of receipt at earlier ages according to Indigenous status. Overall, ‘fully immunised’ coverage has been mostly stable at the 12- and 24-month age milestones since late 2003, but at 60 months of age, coverage reached its highest ever level of 93% during 2015. As in previous years, coverage for ‘fully immunised’ at 12 and 24 months of age among Indigenous children was 3.4% and 3.3% lower than for non-Indigenous children overall, respectively. In 2015, 77.8% of Australian females aged 15 years had 3 documented doses of HPV vaccine (jurisdictional range 68.0–85.6%), and 86.2% had at least one dose, compared to 73.4% and 82.7%, respectively, in 2014. The differential of on-time vaccination between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in 2015 diminished progressively from 18.4% for vaccines due at 12 months to 15.7% for those due at 24 months of age. In 2015, the proportion of children whose parents had registered an objection to vaccination was 1.2% at the national level, with large regional variations. This was a marked decrease from 1.8% in 2014 and the lowest rate of registered vaccination objection nationally since 2007 when it was 1.1%. Medical contraindication exemptions for Australia were more than double in 2015 compared with the previous year (635 to 1,401).

Identification of the determinants of incomplete vaccination in Australian children

Background and aimsWe aimed to understand the risk factors associated with incomplete vaccination, which may help to identify and prioritise opportunities to intervene. MethodsConsenting parents of children <6 years old attending an outpatient clinic completed a questionnaire, which captured demographic information and their level of agreement with belief statements about vaccination using a 7-point Likert scale. Vaccination status was determined from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register and deemed either “complete” (no doses overdue) or “incomplete” (1 or more doses overdue) at the time of questionnaire completion. ResultsOf 589 children of respondents, 116 (20%) had an incomplete vaccination status. Of these, nearly two-thirds (63%) of parents believed that their child was, in fact, fully-vaccinated. Compared to those with a complete vaccine status, children with an incomplete vaccine status were more likely to be born overseas (p < 0.001), have a larger family size (p = 0.02) and to have parents with lower educational attainment (p = 0.001). Parents of children with an incomplete status reported more doubt about the importance of vaccination and greater concern about vaccine safety, compared to parents of children with a complete status. ConclusionMost parents are supportive of vaccination. Sociodemographic factors may contribute more to the risk of incomplete vaccination than attitudes or beliefs. Some parents are unaware of their child’s vaccination status, suggesting that simple and modern reminders may assist parents to keep up to date.

A protracted mumps outbreak in Western Australia despite high vaccine coverage: a population-based surveillance study

In 2007-08, a genotype J mumps outbreak occurred among Aboriginal people in northern Western Australia, despite high vaccine coverage. In March, 2015, a second protracted mumps outbreak occurred in northern Western Australia and spread widely across rural areas of the state. This time the outbreak was caused by a genotype G virus and again primarily affected Aboriginal people. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of this outbreak. In this population-based surveillance study, we analysed statutory notifications and public health case follow-up data from the Western Australia Notifiable Infectious Diseases Database and vaccination information from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. An outbreak case of mumps was notified if the affected person was living in or visiting a community in Western Australia where there was active mumps transmission, and if mumps infection was confirmed by laboratory diagnosis or by an epidemiological link. We analysed case demographics, vaccination status, and age-standardised attack rates in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people by region of notification. Laboratory diagnoses were made by real-time RT-PCR, serology, or both, and carried out by the sole public pathology provider in Western Australia. Between March 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, 893 outbreak cases were notified. 798 (89%) of 893 outbreak cases were reported in Aboriginal people. 40 (4%) of 893 people were admitted to hospital, and 33 (7%) of 462 men reported orchitis. Mumps attack rates increased sharply with age, peaking in the 15-19 age group. 371 (89%) of 419 people aged 1-19 years were fully vaccinated and 29 (7%) were partly vaccinated. Of the 240 people who tested positive by real-time RT-PCR and had also been tested for mumps-specific IgG and IgM, 165 (69%) were positive for IgG but negative for IgM, indicating the importance of RT-PCR testing for diagnosis in vaccinated populations. None of the cases from the 2007-08 genotype J outbreak were re-notified. The number of mumps outbreaks reported in recent years among highly vaccinated populations, including Indigenous populations, has been growing. More widespread and pre-emptive use of the third dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine might be required to control and prevent future outbreaks in high-risk populations. Research should explore the benefit of increasing the intervals between vaccine doses to strengthen the durability of vaccine protection. None.

Use of different combination diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccines does not increase risk of 30-day infant mortality. A population-based linkage cohort study using administrative data from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register and the National Death Index.

ObjectiveTo determine whether differences in combination DTaP vaccine types at 2, 4 and 6 months of age were associated with mortality (all-cause or non-specific), within 30 days of vaccination. DesignObservational nationwide cohort study. SettingLinked population data from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register and National Death Index. ParticipantsAustralian infants administered a combination trivalent, quadrivalent or hexavalent DTaP vaccine (DTaP types) between January 1999 and December 2010 at 2, 4 and 6 months as part of the primary vaccination series. The study population included 2.9, 2.6, & 2.3 million children in the 2, 4 and 6 month vaccine cohorts, respectively. Main outcome measuresInfants were evaluated for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality within 30 days. A secondary outcome was non-specific mortality (unknown cause of death) within 30 days of vaccination. Non-specific mortality was defined as underlying or other cause of death codes, R95 ‘Sudden infant death syndrome’, R96 ‘Other sudden death, cause unknown’, R98 ‘Unattended death’, R99 ‘Other ill-defined and unspecified cause of mortality’ or where no cause of death was recorded. ResultsThe rate of 30 day all-cause mortality was low and declined from 127.4 to 59.3 deaths per 100,000 person-years between 2 and 6 month cohorts. When compared with trivalent DTaP vaccines, no elevated risk in all-cause or non-specific mortality was seen with any quadrivalent or hexavalent DTaP vaccines, for any cohort. ConclusionUse of routine DTaP combination vaccines with differing disease antigens administered during the first six months of life is not associated with infant mortality.

Factors associated with delayed infant immunization in a nationally representative cohort study.

Many children in developed countries do not receive recommended vaccines on time. However, knowledge about factors related to timeliness remains limited. Quantifying the relative impact of parental attitudes compared with socio-demographic factors for delayed immunization would inform policy responses. Participants in the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children were matched with their vaccination histories in the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (N=4,121). Information about the children and their families were collected in face-to-face interviews in 2003-2004. We considered whether children had completed the primary course for each recommended antigen due by 6months old. Children were categorized as either fully immunized, delayed, or totally non-immunized. The outcome was examined using logistic regression. Population attributable fractions were estimated for key predictors. Delayed immunization was significantly associated with indicators of social disadvantage as well as parental disagreement with immunization. Attributable fractions for delayed immunization included lone motherhood (3.8%; 95% confidence interval CI [0.8, 6.7]), larger family size (39.5%; 95% CI [31.2, 46.8]), residential mobility (3.3%; 95% CI [0.1, 6.5]), lack of private hospital insurance (9.4%; 95% CI [0.7, 17.3]), a medical condition in the child (2.0%; 95% CI [0.2, 3.9]), and parental disagreement with immunization (2.1%; 95% CI [0.3, 3.9]). Parental attitudes accounted for a relatively small percentage of delayed infant immunization. In contrast, many children who did not receive vaccines on time were characterized by social disadvantage, especially larger family size. Researchers and policy-makers should consider how to make timely immunization easier for busy parents.

Effectiveness of 7- and 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in a Schedule Without a Booster Dose: A 10-Year Observational Study

Unique among high-income countries, Australia has used a 3 + 0 schedule (3 primary doses, no booster) for infant pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) since January 2005, initially 7 valent (PCV7) then 13 valent (PCV13) from July 2011. We measured vaccine effectiveness (VE) of both PCVs against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) using 2 methods. Cases were IPD notifications to the national surveillance system of children eligible for respective PCVs. For case-control method, up to 10 age-matched controls were derived from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. For indirect cohort method, controls were IPD cases due to serotypes not in PCVs. VE was calculated as (1 - odds ratio [OR]) × 100 by logistic regression. VE waning was estimated as odds of vaccine type (VT) IPD in consecutive 12-month periods post-dose 3. Between 2005 and 2014, there were 1209 and 308 IPD cases in PCV7-eligible and PCV13-eligible cohorts, respectively. Both methods gave comparable VE estimates. In infants, VE for 3 doses against VT IPD was 92.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7% to 99.3%) for PCV7 and 86.5% (95% CI, 11.7% to 97.9%) for PCV13. From 12 months post-dose 3, the odds of VT IPD by 24-36 months increased significantly for PCV7 (5.6, 95% CI, 1.2-25.4) and PCV13 (5.9, 95% CI, 1.0-35.2). For both PCVs in a 3 + 0 schedule, despite similar VE, progressive increase in breakthrough cases only occurred post-PCV13. This supports the importance of a booster dose of PCV13 in the second year of life to maintain protection.

No jab, no record: Catch-up vaccination of children in immigration detention.

International Health and Medical Services (IHMS) are contracted to provide health services, including catch-up vaccination, for individuals in immigration detention. Our audit of catch-up vaccination in asylum seeker children who spent time in held detention demonstrates inadequate and suboptimal vaccine delivery in this setting, and no evidence that IHMS recorded vaccines on the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register at the time. We also found substantial shortfalls in vaccination for these children after they were released from detention. Immunisation in this cohort falls well below Australian community standards, does not demonstrate assurance in IHMS provision of care, and has implications for similar asylum seeker cohorts nationally as well as people in held detention.

Parental Immunisation Needs and Attitudes Survey in paediatric hospital clinics and community maternal and child health centres in Melbourne, Australia.

Despite Australia's high vaccination rates, an estimated 3.3% of children are under-vaccinated due to vaccine refusal and the proportion of parents with concerns is unclear. Amongst Australian parents, we aimed to determine the prevalence of vaccine concerns, resources and health-care providers (HCPs) accessed and satisfaction with these resources in two different settings. We also aimed to identify relationships between the level of vaccine concern, socio-economic status and vaccine uptake. Parents of children under 5 years attending general paediatric clinics in a tertiary paediatric hospital (n = 301/398, 76%) and children under 19 months attending community maternal child health centres (n = 311/391, 81%) completed the survey. Vaccination status was obtained from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. Despite high support for vaccination (98%, confidence interval (CI) 97-99), 43% of parents reported vaccine concerns (CI 40-47) including the number of vaccines given in the first 2 years (25%, CI 22 to 29), vaccine ingredients (22%, CI 19-25), allergies (18%, CI 15-21), weakening of the immune system (17%, CI 14-20) and autism (11%, CI 8-13). HCPs were the most commonly accessed and trusted information source. In all, 23% of parents reported insufficient knowledge to make good vaccination decisions (CI 20-26). There was little evidence of an association between parental vaccine acceptance or socio-economic status and vaccination status. Despite high support for vaccines, nearly half of Australian parents have some concerns and a quarter lack vaccine decision-making confidence regarding childhood vaccines. Parents frequently access and report high trust in HCPs, who are best placed to address parental vaccine concerns through provision of clear information, using effective communication strategies. Further research in more highly hesitant populations is required to determine the relationship between the level and nature of vaccination concerns and vaccine uptake.

Vaccine decision-making begins in pregnancy: Correlation between vaccine concerns, intentions and maternal vaccination with subsequent childhood vaccine uptake

IntroductionMaternal and childhood vaccine decision-making begins prenatally. Amongst pregnant Australian women we aimed to ascertain vaccine information received, maternal immunisation uptake and attitudes and concerns regarding childhood vaccination. We also aimed to determine any correlation between a) intentions and concerns regarding childhood vaccination, (b) concerns about pregnancy vaccination, (c) socioeconomic status (SES) and (d) uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccines during pregnancy and routine vaccines during childhood. MethodsWomen attending public antenatal clinics were recruited in three Australian states. Surveys were completed on iPads. Follow-up phone surveys were done three to six months post delivery, and infant vaccination status obtained via the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR). ResultsBetween October 2015 and March 2016, 975 (82%) of 1184 mothers consented and 406 (42%) agreed to a follow up survey, post delivery. First-time mothers (445; 49%) had significantly more vaccine concerns in pregnancy and only 73% had made a decision about childhood vaccination compared to 89% of mothers with existing children (p-value<0.001). 66% of mothers reported receiving enough information during pregnancy on childhood vaccination. In the post delivery survey, 46% and 82% of mothers reported receiving pregnancy influenza and pertussis vaccines respectively. The mother's degree of vaccine hesitancy and two attitudinal factors were correlated with vaccine uptake post delivery. There was no association between reported maternal vaccine uptake or SES and childhood vaccine uptake. ConclusionFirst time mothers are more vaccine hesitant and undecided about childhood vaccination, and only two thirds of all mothers believed they received enough information during pregnancy. New interventions to improve both education and communication on childhood and maternal vaccines, delivered by midwives and obstetricians in the Australian public hospital system, may reduce vaccine hesitancy for all mothers in pregnancy and post delivery, particularly first-time mothers.

Linking the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register to population-based perinatal datasets to assess coverage in at-risk groups

ABSTRACT&#x0D; ObjectiveImmunisation remains one of the most important public health interventions. However, linkage of population-based immunisation registers to perinatal and health outcome datasets to evaluate immunisation programs is limited. We have conducted the first-ever linkages of immunisation records from Australia’s Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) for the purposes of evaluating Australia’s unique national immunisation program. As an initial outcome of our linkage study we present estimates of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) coverage for the 3rd dose assessed at 12 months of age in extremely preterm children (gestational age &lt;28 weeks), in whom a funded vaccination program was established in 2001 prior to a universal funded program for all children in 2005.&#x0D; ApproachIndividual immunisation records from ACIR, hospital admissions, deaths and infectious diseases notifications were linked to perinatal records for a cohort of births from 1996 to 2012 in two Australian states. Three separate data linkage units were involved in the process with varying procedures for linkage. The perinatal datasets were used to identify extremely preterm children.&#x0D; ResultsThe birth cohort for the study included 1,958,537 live births in New South Wales (1,492,399) and Western Australia (461,620). Linkage weights based on sensitivity and positive predictive value of &gt;99% were used to identify immunisation records from ACIR to link to the birth cohort. A unique scrambled pin on ACIR was used to link immunisation records to birth cohort datasets. The final cohort consisted of 1,954,019 children with 95.5% linking to at least 1 ACIR record from a total of &gt;26.6 million ACIR records. In 2001, coverage of the 3rd dose of PCV in extremely preterm children was 0.9% and increased to 69.1% in 2004 (overall coverage 2001-2004: 25.3%). From 2005 to 2012, coverage increased to an average of 89.7%.&#x0D; ConclusionThese are the first results of cross-jurisdictional linkages of immunisation records to state-based administrative datasets in Australia. This process has identified some improvements that are needed to streamline future linkage projects of this scale. Linkage of perinatal datasets to ACIR has enabled us to assess the first-ever coverage estimates in specific medically at-risk population subgroups. Future analyses will focus on the predictors and timeliness of vaccination coverage and population based estimates of vaccine effectiveness.

When parents won\u2019t vaccinate their children: a qualitative investigation of australian primary care providers\u2019 experiences

BackgroundIncreasingly, the experiences and perceptions of parents who decline vaccination are the subject of investigation. However, the experiences of clinicians who encounter these parents in the course of their work has received little academic attention to date. This study aimed to understand the challenges faced and strategies used when general practitioners and immunising nurses encounter parents who choose not to vaccinate their children.MethodsPrimary care providers were recruited from regions identified through the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) as having higher than national average rates of registered objection to childhood vaccination. Interviews began with an exploration of provider experiences with parents who accept, are hesitant towards, and who decline vaccination. Participants were asked specifically about how they addressed any difficulties they encountered in their interactions. Thematic analysis focused on encounters with parents – challenges and strategies.ResultsTwenty-six general practitioners (GPs), community and practice nurses (PNs) were interviewed across two regions in NSW, Australia. Providers’ sense of professional identity as health advocates and experts became conflicted in their encounters with vaccine objecting parents. Providers were dissatisfied when such consultations resulted in a ‘therapeutic roadblock’ whereby provider-parent communication came to a standstill. There were mixed views about being asked to sign forms exempting parents from vaccinating their children. These ranged from a belief that completing the forms rewarded parents for non-conformity to seeing it as a positive opportunity for engagement. Three common strategies were employed by providers to navigate through these challenges; 1) to explore and inform, 2) to mobilise clinical rapport and 3) to adopt a general principle to first do no harm to the therapeutic relationship.ConclusionsMany healthcare providers find consultations with vaccine objecting parents challenging and some, particularly more experienced providers, employ successful strategies to address this. Primary care providers, especially those more junior, could benefit from additional communication guidance to better the outcome and increase the efficiency of their interactions with such parents.

Providing opportunistic immunisations for at-risk inpatients in a tertiary paediatric hospital.

Attaining high immunisation coverage rates for children with medical conditions is vital. The Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) Immunisation Service has the opportunity to check each inpatient's immunisation status and provide opportunistic vaccines and/or bring the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) up-to-date. This paper highlights that during admission, one quarter of children were not up-to-date with routine scheduled immunisations and 42% of those inpatients due or overdue for immunisation were vaccinated. The model of establishing routine checking of immunisation records and reminding hospital staff about immunisation can result in improvements in vaccination coverage. Healthcare providers have a responsibility to check immunisation status and offer vaccines when necessary; however, often there are missed opportunities to immunise. This paper demonstrates that having a dedicated Immunisation Service, a partnership with a relevant government agency, and effective collaboration with inpatient clinical teams, opportunistic immunisation can be achieved for inpatients.

Linking the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register to population-based perinatal datasets to assess coverage in at-risk groups

Linking the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register to population-based perinatal datasets to assess coverage in at-risk groups

P.5.d.006 - Concomitant administration of quetiapine/rivastigmine in Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD)

The study aimed to examine the consistency in factors associated with attitudes towards vaccination and MMR vaccination status.Using the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children matched with the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register, 4,779 children were included from 2004–2005 to 2010–11. Different MMR vaccine dosages and general attitude towards vaccination were modelled individually with multinomial logit regressions, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and health related factors of the children and their primary carers.The group with non-vaccination and negative attitudes was characterised by more siblings and older parents; the group with under-vaccination but positive attitudes was characterised by younger parental age; and the group with under-vaccination and neutral attitudes was characterised by less socioeconomically advantaged areas. The presence of parental medical condition(s), being private or public renters, and higher parental education were associated with under-vaccination but not with attitudes towards vaccination, whilst parental religion was associated with attitudes towards vaccination but not reflected in the vaccine uptake.Vaccine attitudes were largely consistent with MRR vaccine outcomes. However, there was variation in the associations of factors with vaccine attitudes and uptake. The results have implications for different policy designs that target subgroups with consistent or inconsistent vaccination attitudes and behaviour. Parents with intentional and unintentional under-vaccination are of policy concern and require different policy solutions.