Abstract Disclosure: J. Porto: None. E. Ssemmondo: None. N. Obike: None. A. Abobaker: None. R. March: None. N. Tun: None. T. Pawlak: None. Objective: A clinical audit was conducted to assess if there was any improvement in management of hypophosphatemia among patients admitted to the medical wards using the local Trust protocol, following structured edcational sessions to the junior doctors covering medical wards. Design and methodology: The 2 cycles of the audit were conducted between March 2020 and September 2021 in Scarborough district Hospital. The clinical notes of 52 patients (20 in the first cycle and 32 in the re-audit) with hypophosphatemia were reviewed. These were identified using the electronic laboratory results of patients within the study period. The aspects of the trust protocol for management of hypophosphatemia that were audited; documentation of symptoms associated with low phosphate levels, cardiac monitoring in severe hypophosphatemia, identification of the likely cause of hypophosphatemia, the presence or absence of associated acute kidney injury (AKI) and initiation of phosphate replacement. The results of the first audit were presented at the local hospital clinical governance meeting (August 2020). Following this, 2 teaching sessions and 2-case based discussion on hypophosphatemia were organised for all the doctors in the department of medicine. The re-audit was subsequently conducted after the fourth teaching session. The proportions of each audited item were compared between the first audit and the re-audit using Fisher exact probability test. Results:25% of patients in the first audit had severe hypophosphatemia compared to 28% in the re-audit. In patients with severe hypophosphataemia, only 33.3% had cardiac monitoring during the re-audit cycle compared to 60% in the first cycle, and the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.58). There was significant improvement in the documentation of symptoms of hypophosphataemia amongst inpatients during the re-audit cycle compared with the initial cycle; 62.5% vs only 10% (P 0.002). Most patients had an underlying cause of the hypophosphatemia identified (80% and 62.5%-first and second cycle respectively). AKI was associated with hypophosphataemia in 15% & 34.4% (P 0.2) in the first and second cycles respectively. Despite low phosphate levels, 25% and 28.1% at the initial audit and the second cycle respectively did not receive any form of phosphate replacement. Conclusion: The two-cycle clinical audit showed that the teaching sessions on management of hypophosphatemia increased the awareness of the importance to document whether the patients were symptomatic or asymptomatic following the drop in their phosphate levels, which can help to identify patients at risk of developing complications, such as cardiac arrythmias. However, these sessions were not sufficient to improve overall management of patients with low phosphate levels. Presentation: 6/1/2024
Read full abstract