Auction Execution Research Articles

Resistance Against Cancellation of Auction Execution on Mortgage Rights Guarantee

This research aims to determine the resistance to cancellation of auction for the collateral object of the mortgage right and the creditor’s responsibility toward the auction winner, when, the object of the mortgage right has a lawsuit against the creditor from another party. The research method used in this research is a normative juridical research method. The research results show that the auction cannot be canceled if it complies with existing regulations and procedures as regulated in PMK.No.213/PMK.06/2020 concerning instructions for carrying out auctions. Creditors can be held responsible if an auction is canceled after the auction has been executed as regulated in Minister of Finance Regulation, PMK No. 213/PMK.06/2020 concerning instructions for implementing auctions. Creditors must ensure the validity of the mortgage object being auctioned. So, if the creditor is negligent in this matter, it is the responsibility of the creditor (auction seller) to provide compensation for third-party losses.
 Keywords: cancellation, auction execution, guarantee, mortgage

Kepastian hukum terhadap pemenang lelang dalam lelang agunan bank (Studi Kasus pada Putusan Nomor 193/PDT.G/2019/PN.PTK)

Using common violations, the Law on Liability gives the creditor the privilege of executing the object in his power. Furthermore, repayment of receivables is taken from the proceeds of the auction with priority rights from other creditors. Through Pirate Execution based on the executory title stated in the Certificate of Dependent Rights Following the provisions of Article 11 paragraph (2) letter KUUHT, APHT stipulates the emptying of the object of the dependent right at the time of execution of the dependent right, so that the debtor is obliged to follow the auction decision and has no reason to refuse the emptying. In the Universal People's Credit Bank, there was a conflict because the debtor did not pay the receivables following the previous agreement. As a result, the creditor, the Universal People's Credit Bank in Pontianak, executed the guarantee through a public auction. However, the debtor made legal efforts to oppose (verzet), and the debtor filed an objection in case No.193/Pdt.G/2019/PN. Ptk.The winner of the auction cannot reverse the name or control the auction results. This study used a normative jurisprudence law approach. This method deals with problems by studying the provisions of applicable laws and regulations. The focus of this study is descriptive analysis. Therefore, the decision of civil case No. 193/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Ptk, Deed of Auction Minutes No. 492/53/2020, Law No. 10 of 1998, Law on Dependent Rights No. 4 of 1996, Basic Agrarian Law No. 5 of 1960, and Minister of Finance Regulation No. 213/PMK.06/2020 concerning Technical Guidelines for Auction Implementation are the subjects of this study. The research reveals the efforts of the block applicant and the Land Office to file an Unlawful Action lawsuit with the Court to remove the block as legal protection for the auction winner. The winner of the auction can also ask the District Court to stop the auction object. In decision number 193/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Ptk, the Panel of Judges stated that the object of the dependent rights used by the Plaintiff as collateral has the same executory power as a court decision that has permanent legal force. Under the executory title, an execution auction can be conducted directly, and the debtor must leave or vacate the property of the lien. Because it has violated the civil rights of others, the plaintiff's actions are included in the category of unlawful actions. To avoid juridical obstacles, the government should be able to amend and add clauses in the UUHT by giving authority or directly appointing bailiffs and police officers to execute collateral emptying as evidenced by the deed of auction minutes to ensure legal certainty in the process of execution of dependent rights. Thus, KPKNL and the Bank can synergize with these rules by carrying out auction execution procedures

Auction for the Execution of Dependent Rights Related to Customers in Default at Bri Kalianda (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Cassation Number: 310/K/Pdt/2023)

The bank as a creditor cannot be harmed by bad credit. Efforts to avoid bad credit are carried out by taking anticipatory steps in the form of a guarantee mechanism for debt repayment. This mechanism is an anticipatory step in the event of bad credit by the debtor. The problem formulation in this research is (1) Does the auction execution have to meet the on-rechtmatige daad? (2) What are the legal consequences of the auction for the execution of mortgage rights in the Cassation Decision Number: 310/K/Pdt/2023? (3) What are the obstacles in carrying out the auction for the execution of mortgage rights? The method used in this research is descriptive normative, with data sources obtained from laws, books, journals, articles, etc. The results of this research are the conditions for an unlawful act, namely, firstly, there is an unlawful act, decision Number 310/K/Pdt/2023, the plaintiff is a bad credit debtor, which is an unlawful act. Since August 2018, the debtor has been in arrears in carrying out his obligations to make credit payments in installments, secondly there is an error, namely he has committed a default (default) on working capital credit, thirdly there is a loss, there is causality. The legal consequences of the Auction for the Execution of Mortgage Rights in the Cassation Decision Number: 310/K/Pdt/2023 do not conflict with applicable law, and have met standard requirements. The implementation of the auction in decision 310 K/Pdt/2023 has been carried out by KPKNL Bandar Lampung in accordance with the provisions of the regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 27/PMK/06/2016/ Concerning instructions for implementing the auction and based on the auction minutes number 255/20/2020/ dated 16 April 2020 there was an auction winner, namely Ms Eva.S. Judex Facti/ Tanjong Karang District Court in this case does not conflict with the law and/or statute, so there are no obstacles in carrying out the auction, because the plaintiff has defaulted (breach of contract).

Acts Unlawful to Remove the Plaintiff's Rights as Winner of the Auction in Court Ruling Case Number 379/Pdt.G/2020/PN.JKT.PST

There is a significant risk of litigation associated with the execution of auctions, especially in practice. Both during and after the auction process, lawsuits are filed, frequently with the plaintiff's intention of delaying the auction's implementation. The variety of cases involving auction tactics is reflected in this litigation. The central issue in these petitions frequently centers on illegal acts carried out during the procedure. The present study aims to investigate two main questions: 1) What are the legal ramifications for the defendant in case they commit a crime that denies the plaintiff their rights as the auction winner, and 2) How do judges weigh the legal factors when making decisions in cases like Case Number 379 / PDT.G/ 2020/ PN.JKT.PST? Judicial-normative research methodology is being used. Based on the study's findings, the paper outlines the legal consequences for defendants who commit such acts, grounded in the provisions of Article 1365, which stipulate that every unlawful act obliges those at fault to compensate for the losses incurred. This is based on four elements: a) The act is contrary to law; b) It results in damages; c) It is executed wrongly; and d) The detrimental act arises causally. As per the judges' considerations before passing the verdict on Case Number 379/PDT.G/2020/PN.JKT.PST, it is crucial for the plaintiff to detail the credit facilities from PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk. c.q. Small Credit Center (SKC) Kramat in the lawsuit, to provide a clear picture to the court of the plaintiff's losses, thus qualifying the defendant's administrative misconduct as an act against the law

The Effect of the Execution of the Sale of the Right Object on the Position of Bank Creditors

The results of this study show that the right of liability is the object of guarantee that is most in demand by creditors (banks) as debt collateral. The value of the rights contained in thecertificate of rights of dependents has an important influence in determining the position of creditors as creditors who have preferential rights or only limited to as a concurrent creditor. If the value of the dependent rights has a greater value than the debtor's debt, then the creditor's position as the holder of the liability right is the preferred creditor, which takes precedence repayment of it than other creditors. However, the determination ofthe creditor's position as a preferred creditor or not can also be viewed from the proceeds of the sale of the object of liability from the results of auction execution. If the selling price of theobject of liability is greater than the debtor's debt, the creditor has the right to take precedence over full repayment by taking the proceeds Net sales are only limited to debtors. Meanwhile, if the proceeds from the sale of the object of liability are smaller than the debtor's debt, then the remaining debt of the debtor positions the creditor as a concurrent creditor meaning that the repayment of the remaining debtor is divided equally with other creditors

The Balancing Between The Principles Of Justice, Legal Certainty, And Expediency In The Implementation Of Auction Execution In The Settlement Of Civil Cases

The ultimate goal of the law enforcement process is that the law guarantees the implementation of equal justice and protection for human dignity, order, peace, and legal certainty under the provisions of the law. Three principles must receive professional attention, although it is challenging to do in practice. Therefore, the Judge must make every effort so that every decision rendered contains the three principles that are the basis and purpose of the law. The research method used in this research is analytical descriptive data obtained from secondary legal sources. The data obtained from field studies and document studies are then analyzed in a qualitative juridical manner. After the data has been collected, it is poured into a logical and systematic description without using mathematical formulas. The purpose of a court is to obtain a judgment and decision-making that knows the actuality of the case. As well as the legal rules governing it that will be applied, both legal authorities wrote in legislation and unwritten law, and to analyze the application of the three principles in the judgment and decision making. The results prove that judgment and decision-making are unrest and unsortable in life without these three principles, especially for justice seekers. Furthermore, the research results show that in applying legal certainty, whatever happens, the rules are so and must be obeyed or implemented. The application of justice is fair if it can provide balanced treatment between rights and obligations. While utilization means that the law exists for humans, then implementing the law or law enforcement must benefit society.

Execution of The Object of Dependent Rights Through Auction Based On The Principle of Proportionality

This research was conducted to analyze the granting of credit by the Bank as the creditor to the debtor with land as collateral to the bank if something goes wrong with what was expected. If a credit problem occurs because the debtor is incapacitated or because the debtor has failed in business which results in reduced income so that obligations cannot be fulfilled, the Mortgage Law (UUHT) exists to provide legal certainty for land rights including collateral rights to land. Efforts made by the bank as a creditor if the debtor defaults in order to obtain repayment due to bad credit, namely by executing one of them through an auction. The research method uses normative research with a statutory approach and a concept approach. This research resulted that the execution of mortgage objects through auctions is still not in accordance with the principles of proportionality and legal protection that can be given to debtors, namely repressive and preventive legal protection. In its development, the fact is that in the implementation of executions carried out by creditors, the proceeds from selling mortgage objects through auction execution are often below market prices and do not give the debtor the opportunity sell mortgage objects privately. Regarding this matter, Article 20 paragraph (2) of the Mortgage Law (UUHT) has actually given a sufficient portion of rights the debtor for the sale of mortgage objects according to market prices, but this is limited by the "on agreement" norm, which actually hinders sales under the contract.

Execution of The Object of Dependent Rights Through Auction Based On The Principle of Proportionality

This research was conducted to analyze the granting of credit by the Bank as the creditor to the debtor with land as collateral to the bank if something goes wrong with what was expected. If a credit problem occurs because the debtor is incapacitated or because the debtor has failed in business which results in reduced income so that obligations cannot be fulfilled, the Mortgage Law (UUHT) exists to provide legal certainty for land rights including collateral rights to land. Efforts made by the bank as a creditor if the debtor defaults in order to obtain repayment due to bad credit, namely by executing one of them through an auction. The research method uses normative research with a statutory approach and a concept approach. This research resulted that the execution of mortgage objects through auctions is still not in accordance with the principles of proportionality and legal protection that can be given to debtors, namely repressive and preventive legal protection. In its development, the fact is that in the implementation of executions carried out by creditors, the proceeds from selling mortgage objects through auction execution are often below market prices and do not give the debtor the opportunity sell mortgage objects privately. Regarding this matter, Article 20 paragraph (2) of the Mortgage Law (UUHT) has actually given a sufficient portion of rights the debtor for the sale of mortgage objects according to market prices, but this is limited by the "on agreement" norm, which actually hinders sales under the contract.

EKSEKUSI LELANG HAK TANGGUNGAN TERHADAP KREDIT MACET DI BANK NAGARI PUSAT PADANG

Banks occupy a very important place in meeting the needs of the community.This can be seen from one of its goals,to satisfy credit needs,the descriptions in this journal are: 1) What are the causes ofbad loans at Bank Nagari.2) How is the execution mechanism of the mortgage auction as a settlement ofbad loans at Bank Nagari.3) What are the obstaclesandefforts made by the Bank towardstheauction execution mechanism as a settlementwith badcredit.To answer these problems, the writer conducted a descriptive sociological juridical research which was conducted to obtain primary data through interviews and the results obtained were presented descriptively. From the results of the research that the author conducted at Bank Nagari central Padang, it can be seen that: 1) The causes of the emergence of bad loans come from internal factors (creditors) andexternal factors (debtors)whichbothhave an important influence on credit. 2) The procedure for the auction execution mechanism at Bank Nagari through KP2LN which has the authority to execute the auction.3) The obstacles commonly encountered by the Bank in the execution of the auction are the price agreement which is dropped below the market price of the collateral, which causes the debtor whose credit is bad to feel loss.Keywords: Agreement, Execution, Auction, Mortgage, Bad Credit

Toward Privacy-Preserving Blockchain-Based Electricity Auction for V2G Networks in the Smart Grid

With the development of electric vehicle (EV) technology, EV has become a key component in the future smart grid. Due to the sheer large number of EVs on the road, the emerging vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology, which allows for two-way electrical flows between EVs and the power grid, is gaining traction. However, establishing a fair and private electricity exchange scheme has gradually become a critical challenge. The emergence of blockchain technology offers a novel approach for resolving this issue. In this study, we overview the opportunities and challenges of blockchain in the smart grid. Then, we provide a privacy-preserving blockchain-based electricity auction scheme for V2G networks in smart grid. In particular, we exploit PS group signatures to keep the privacy of EVs or charging stations and leverage blockchain to provide automated auction execution. With our mechanism, the identity of EV/charging station is conditionally protected. In case of an emergency, the trusted authority (i.e., the group manager) can open the identity. Meanwhile, we present the security analysis to prove our scheme’s security. Finally, we implement the experiment to evaluate efficiency. The experimental results show that our proposal is efficient and suitable for V2G networks.

The Juridical Study Claims for Cancellation of Insurance Rights Auction Execution

This study aims to examine the issue of the lawsuit for canceling the execution of credit guarantee auctions that are burdened with mortgage rights in the Boyolali District Court Decision Number 64/Pdt.G/2018/PN Byl. Reviewing Judges' Considerations in Deciding Cases on Claims for Cancellation of Execution of Mortgage Auctions. Reviewing the Legal Consequences of Lawsuits for Cancellation of Execution of Mortgage Auctions. This research is a normative juridical research. This research focuses on document or library research which essentially looks for theories, views that have correlation and are relevant to the problems to be studied. The results of the study concluded that the lawsuit for the cancellation of the execution of the credit guarantee auction that was burdened with mortgage rights in the Boyolali District Court Decision Number: 64/Pdt. G/2018/PN Byl, which starts with the provision of Local Credit Facilities (Current Accounts) with a credit limit not exceeding IDR 1,700,000,000.00 (one billion seven hundred million rupiah), based on Credit Agreement No. 125/PK/KRED/SLA/2008 dated October 13, 2008, and has been amended and updated several times, most recently by Amendment to Credit Agreement No. 145/AD/KRED/SLA/2015 dated October 6, 2015, and has been extended several times, most recently with the Notification of Extension of Period No. 145/AD/KRED/SLA/2015. 00118/SLA/SPPJ/2017 dated October 12, 2017. However, during the credit agreement period, the Plaintiff defaulted because he did not make installments every month, so Defendant I had given warning letters 3 times, therefore Defendant I through Defendant II carried out an auction execution of the object of credit guarantee that had been registered with the Mortgage Rights. The judge's consideration in deciding the lawsuit for the cancellation of the execution of the mortgage auction that was burdened with Mortgage was based on the exception of Defendant I and the evidence presented at the trial, which showed that the auction of the execution of the mortgage on the Collateral Object had been carried out in accordance with Article 22 PMK No. 27/PMK.06/2016, namely by the Class I Auction Officer at the Surakarta KPKNL is legally valid. The legal consequences of the Boyolali District Court Decision Number: 64/Pdt. G/2018/PN Byl that the auction of Mortgage Execution conducted by Defendant I and Defendant II of the collateral that is guaranteed by the credit agreement through the Surakarta State Property and Auction Service Intermediary Office (KPKNL) is legal according to law. The legal consequence for the Plaintiff is the obligation to pay court fees.

The Juridical Study Claims for Cancellation of Insurance Rights Auction Execution

This study aims to examine the issue of the lawsuit for canceling the execution of credit guarantee auctions that are burdened with mortgage rights in the Boyolali District Court Decision Number 64/Pdt.G/2018/PN Byl. Reviewing Judges' Considerations in Deciding Cases on Claims for Cancellation of Execution of Mortgage Auctions. Reviewing the Legal Consequences of Lawsuits for Cancellation of Execution of Mortgage Auctions. This research is a normative juridical research. This research focuses on document or library research which essentially looks for theories, views that have correlation and are relevant to the problems to be studied. The results of the study concluded that the lawsuit for the cancellation of the execution of the credit guarantee auction that was burdened with mortgage rights in the Boyolali District Court Decision Number: 64/Pdt. G/2018/PN Byl, which starts with the provision of Local Credit Facilities (Current Accounts) with a credit limit not exceeding IDR 1,700,000,000.00 (one billion seven hundred million rupiah), based on Credit Agreement No. 125/PK/KRED/SLA/2008 dated October 13, 2008, and has been amended and updated several times, most recently by Amendment to Credit Agreement No. 145/AD/KRED/SLA/2015 dated October 6, 2015, and has been extended several times, most recently with the Notification of Extension of Period No. 145/AD/KRED/SLA/2015. 00118/SLA/SPPJ/2017 dated October 12, 2017. However, during the credit agreement period, the Plaintiff defaulted because he did not make installments every month, so Defendant I had given warning letters 3 times, therefore Defendant I through Defendant II carried out an auction execution of the object of credit guarantee that had been registered with the Mortgage Rights. The judge's consideration in deciding the lawsuit for the cancellation of the execution of the mortgage auction that was burdened with Mortgage was based on the exception of Defendant I and the evidence presented at the trial, which showed that the auction of the execution of the mortgage on the Collateral Object had been carried out in accordance with Article 22 PMK No. 27/PMK.06/2016, namely by the Class I Auction Officer at the Surakarta KPKNL is legally valid. The legal consequences of the Boyolali District Court Decision Number: 64/Pdt. G/2018/PN Byl that the auction of Mortgage Execution conducted by Defendant I and Defendant II of the collateral that is guaranteed by the credit agreement through the Surakarta State Property and Auction Service Intermediary Office (KPKNL) is legal according to law. The legal consequence for the Plaintiff is the obligation to pay court fees.

Do volatility extensions improve the quality of closing call auctions?

AbstractTo improve the efficiency of the closing price, many equity exchanges apply volatility extensions to their closing call auctions (CCAs). If an imminent auction execution implies a large price change, the order submission period is extended to let traders reconsider their orders. This paper uses the introduction of closing auction volatility extensions at NASDAQ Nordic to provide the first analysis of the effects of such mechanisms. We find that the volatility extensions reduce transitory volatility and deter price manipulation at the close. Consistent with increased trust in the mechanism, the CCA attracts higher volumes after the change.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMENANG LELANG SEBAGAI PEMBELI BERITIKAD BAIK YANG DIGUGAT KEMBALI

When the bank debtors did not make the payment, the bank as the holder of the mortgage is bound in the credit agreement by obtaining fulfillment of the debtor's credit through an auction process as mandated by law. Problems will arise if the auction winner cannot own or control what he has won because the debtor uses the auction process on the collateral. Then the winner of the auction is a buyer with ‘good faith’ who must be protected by law, and legal protection for the buyer with ‘good faith’ as stated in article 584 of the Civil Code of ‘good faith’ exists if the property rights are obtained through one of the means to obtain property rights, where from that article It is known that some of the transfer of existing property rights cannot be separated from the existence of the agreement law in the Civil Code. Legal remedies that can be taken by the injured parties during the auction execution by the court if there is a rebuttal due to the lawsuit made by the original owner which is later won by the court's decision of the original owner, then the auction holder can submit legal remedies to the high court to resolve the problem by way of an appeal to the Supreme Court. This is because selling through an auction is a civil selling effort and legal remedies that can be taken within the scope of civil law.

AKAD FINANCING OF MURABAHAH BETWEEN CUSTOMERS WITH MUAMALAT BANKS HARKAT VIEWED FROM SHARI'AH PRINCIPLES

Currently in Indonesia Islamic Bank has gained a place and interested in the community, causing many emerging Syari'ah Bank and Financial Institutions of the syari'ah, and products in Islamic banks are widely used is murabahah financing. The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1). How is the implementation of the sale and purchase through murabahah financing between Bank Muamalat Harkat with customers. (2). Is trading system murabahah financing between Bank Muamalat Harkat and customers have been according to the principles of Syari’ah. (3). How murabahah financing efforts to resolve the breach between the customer and Muamalat Harkat. This research method is empirical legal research, this study was conducted in Bank Muamalat Harkat based data collection through field research such as interviews, observation and description as well as information from respondents through library research. The results of this research are: before an agreement Bank to assess carefully the prospective customer in the form of a comprehensive analysis and is divided into several stages, such as the assessment using the principle of 5C Character (Character of the debitor), Chapacity (Capability Candidate Debitor) , Capital (Capital candidate Debitor), Collateral (Collateral candidate Debitor) and Condition of economy (economic condition of the prospective Borrower). Trading system murabahah financing between Bank Muamalat Harkat with the customer has not fully based on the principles of the Syari'ah. Murabahah financing efforts to resolve the defaults can be solved by R3 is Restrukturing (Arrangement Back), Reconditioning (Terms Back) and Rescheduling (rescheduling), sales collateral and auction execution.

Legal Protection For The Winner Of Execution Auction Over The Auction Object That Sued Before District Court

In the process of auction execution often arise a lawsuit over the auction implementation, this is because the auction of execution is done not on the willingness of the owner of the goods themselves but because the law gives authority to the creditors to conduct public auction on the guarantee of debtors that default. So in the process of conveyance of auction object from the seller to the auction buyer often cause a problem, such as can not be mastered by auction winner the auction object. The purpose of this research is to know how to find out how the legal protection for the winner of the auction of execution of mortgage rights in mastering the auction object on the auction object which filed the lawsuit to the state court. This research is done by normative method. Based on the research that has been done, the winner of the auction can not be directly mastering the auction object because there is a civil suit over the auction object are expanding following. This is as article 3 paragraph (1), (2), and subsection (3) of the regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/head of the national land Agency number 13 Year 2017 on The Block and confiscation who explains that if there is a dispute or conflict over land rights law the land that became the object of the auction then blocking would have done. And the protection of the law against the winner of the auction provided by regulation of the Minister of finance Number 27/PMK. 06/2016 Hints would about implementation of auctions, HIR. In addition, in article 19 paragraph (1) of law No. 8 Year 1999 on the protection of Consumers and in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court's verdict against RI No. 1068 K/Pdt/2008 Dated January 21, 2009 in National Conference MA Year 2011.

Auction Of Execution Confiscated And National Confiscated

The applicants auction sellers often in practice face prosecution or a lawsuit from a third party that the goods to be auctioned are their own and not the property of those who had been cut with a criminal offense, as it sometimes is the case / light after the auction conducted and considered have been completed. In addition to the auction buyer after he mastered the goods purchased from the auction process also sometimes face prosecution or a lawsuit from a third party that the goods he bought from the auction is actually owned by third parties. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal protection given to the rightful owner of the auction the buyer of goods or execution of plunder and spoils the country carried out by KPKNL Yogyakarta. This type of research is empirical. Source data using primary and secondary data. The data were analyzed descriptively qualitative. The results showed that the form of legal protection to each of the parties related to the auction execution of plunder and booty state 1) Acting as seller / applicant auction execution is the police or the prosecutor.; 2) To the owner of the goods / owner beginning of good will get legal protection to prevent the auction execution if the auction is not conducted through the path objections / rebuttals, however, if the auction had been implemented, the original owner can file a lawsuit with the District Court, if based on the decisions of the Court the country was the original owner declared right then he can ask them to buyers KPKNL that the goods be returned; 3) To the auction buyers who have a good-faith execution of legal protection in the form of refund of the purchase that have been paid without any deduction. but if the auction had been implemented, the original owner can file a lawsuit with the District Court, if based on the District Court declared the original owner right then he can ask to the buyer that the goods be returned KPKNL.Keywords: Legal Protection; The Auction Execution; KPKNL Yogyakarta.

Criminal Law Protection Of Giving Rights Of Liability Is Not The Debtor

In the practice of the loan agreement with collateral Mortgage made by banks as creditors, so if the debtor defaults in performing its debt to the creditor, the creditor has the right to make the execution of security object Encumbrance with its own power after first obtaining fiat yustitsia of the chairman of the court country where the land is located. In case of dispute the auction execution of mortgage security object between the Bank as the creditor with Zn as the debtor, as creditors of the bank's declared to have violated provisions of the law in the execution of security object security rights belonging to the debtor Zn. But in fact the execution and the execution of the auction object of mortgage collateral is in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 and Article 20 UUHT No. 4 of 1996 and also in accordance with the provisions and procedures of the auction procedure execution security object security rights under the laws of the auction. The problems addressed in this study is how to legality and legal power auction object execution Mortgage guarantees made at the request of creditors certificate holder.Keywords: Legal Protection, Criminal, and Encumbrance .

Execution of Security Rights in Islamic Banking at the Religious Court of Purbalingga

This article examines the execution of a security interest in Islamic banking in the Islamic economic disputes in the Purbalingga Religious Court. The case of non-performing loans in the world of Islamic banking is often the case, this was due to the debtor defaults. Mortgages used as collateral can be executed based on the decision of the Religious Court. The method used in this research is a kind of field research with the approach of Socio Legal Research, including in the realm of non-doctrinal study. The results show the execution of a security interest in dispute sharia economy in Purbalingga Religious Court has been run in accordance with the mandate of the Act: On the substance of the Implementation of the decision of execution is the end of a case that is the result of what is required by the plaintiff are determined in a court of Religion with using the guidelines do not separate from the disciplinary proceedings contained in HIR or Rbg. On the Structure of Purbalingga Religious Court carry out executions by institutions that are available from the start to the filing of the petition to the Chairman of the Religious Courts, judges who will examine the final verdict, Executor who will call and will execute and when the auction Clerk role of the mentor State Property Office and Auction (KPKNL). Culturally law. Purbalingga Religious Court carry out the execution-based approaches to religion and culture. This approach proved to facilitate execution. Obstacles that faced in general, form, creditors often receive a guaranteed land and buildings where the land certificate is no longer appropriate to the actual situation, the Debtor is not willing to leave the place right dependents, barriers to the sale of objects auction execution which does not go unsold objects auction / auction. Constraints that normally occurs in the execution of this economic security rights dispute, can be resolved by various reinforcement structures / institutions and culture through the law chosen by the Purbalingga Religious Courts.

Robot-enabled execution system for perishables auction logistics

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose a concept of cloud auction robot (CAR) and its execution platform for transforming perishable food supply chain management. A new paradigm of goods-to-person auction execution model is proposed based on CARs. This paradigm can shift the management of traditional manual working to automated execution with great space and time saving. A scalable CAR-enabled execution system (CARES) is presented to manage logistics workflows, tasks and behavior of CAR-Agents in handling the real-time events and associated data.Design/methodology/approachAn Internet of Things enabled auction environment is designed. The robot is used to pick up and deliver the auction products and commends are given to the robot in real-time. CARES architecture is proposed while integrating three core services from auction workflow management, auction task management, to auction execution control. A system prototype was developed to show its execution through physical emulations and experiments.FindingsThe CARES could well schedule the tasks for each robot to minimize their waiting time. The total execution time is reduced by 33 percent on average. Space utilization for each auction studio is improved by about 50 percent per day.Originality/valueThe CAR-enabled execution model and system is simulated and verified in a ubiquitous auction environment so as to upgrade the perishable food supply chain management into a new level which is automated and real-time. The proposed system is flexible to cope with different auction scenarios, such as different auction mechanisms and processes, with high reconfigurability and scalability.