Situated expectancy-value theory is one of the most prominent theories for examining students’ motivational beliefs, suggesting that both students’ expectancy beliefs and task values are antecedents of important academic outcomes. Further, interactions between expectancy beliefs and task values often exist and suggest critical theoretical considerations. In this study, we examined how the interaction between students’ baseline expectancy beliefs and task values (utility, attainment, interest, and cost) predicts weekly motivational beliefs in an introductory statistics course for psychology majors in the United States (N = 145) using an intensive longitudinal design. Using multilevel modeling, we found interaction effects of expectancy beliefs x attainment value on weekly competence and cost, expectancy beliefs x anticipated cost on weekly value, expectancy beliefs x interest value on weekly cost. Results suggested that having high baseline value, or low cost, may be unable to buffer against low expectancy beliefs. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Read full abstract