Asymptomatic Contact Lens Wearers Research Articles

Gene expression changes in conjunctival cells associated with contact lens wear and discomfort

PurposeThis study aimed to analyze the differences in the expression of pain-related genes in conjunctival epithelial cells among symptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers (SCLWs), asymptomatic CL wearers (ACLWs), and non-CL wearers (non-CLWs). MethodsFor this study, 60 participants (20 non-CLWs, 40 CLWs) were enrolled. The CLW group comprised 20 ACLWs and 20 SCLWs according to the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire short form©. Conjunctival cells were collected using impression cytology, and RNA was isolated and used to determine the expression levels of 85 human genes involved in neuropathic and inflammatory pain. The effects of CL wear and discomfort were evaluated using mixed-effects ANOVA with partially nested fixed-effects model. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed to assign biological meaning to sets of differentially expressed genes. ResultsSix genes (CD200, EDN1, GRIN1, PTGS1, P2RX7, and TNF) were significantly upregulated in CLWs compared to non-CLWs. Eleven genes (ADORA1, BDKRB1, CACNA1B, DBH, GRIN1, GRM1, HTR1A, PDYN, PTGS1, P2RX3, and TNF) were downregulated in SCLWs compared to ACLWs. These genes were mainly related to pain, synaptic transmission and signaling, ion transport, calcium transport and concentration, and cell-cell signaling. ConclusionsCL wear modified the expression of pain- and inflammation-related genes in conjunctival epithelial cells. These changes may be in part, along with other mechanisms, responsible for CL discomfort in SCLWs.

Reliability and agreement of subjective and objective non‐invasive break‐up time measurements in contact lens wearers

AbstractPurposeTo assess the reliability and agreement of non‐invasive break‐up time (NIBUT) in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers using automatic objective and conventional subjective techniques.MethodsIn this prospective cross‐sectional study, soft CL wearers, classified into symptomatic and asymptomatic based on the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire‐8, underwent NIBUT assessment with the CL in situ. The CA‐800 Corneal Analyzer and the EasyTear® VIEW+ Tearscope were used for objective and subjective evaluation, respectively. The within‐subject repeatability and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. The agreement between the devices was compared using the Bland–Altman method.ResultsA total of 141 CL wearers (51 male and 90 female) with a mean age of 33.6 (SD = 12.2) years were included. The repeatability and ICC values obtained with the CA‐800 device when measuring NIBUT were 5.4 s and 58.6% across the whole sample, 4.2 s and 48.8% for the asymptomatic group and 7.1 s and 68.4% for the symptomatic group. When using the subjective method (EasyTear®), the respective repeatability and ICC values were 7.3 s and 32.7% for the whole sample, 6.5 s and 30.4% for the asymptomatic group and 8.6 s and 35.9% for the symptomatic group. The CA‐800 device provided significantly (p < 0.001) shorter NIBUT values compared with EasyTear® for the whole sample (3.3 [2.9] vs. 8.1 [3.4] s), the asymptomatic (3.3 [3.0] vs. 7.7 [3.6] s) and the symptomatic (3.8 [2.9] vs. 8.6 [3.0] s) groups.ConclusionObjective (CA‐800) NIBUT assessment provides more reliable measurements than the conventional subjective technique using the EasyTear® device. However, CL practitioners should also be aware that the objective method indicates shorter NIBUT values. Symptomatic CL wearers may also need a higher number of NIBUT measurements to obtain reliable estimations.

Conjunctival microbiome changes in soft contact lens users and contact lens discomfort patients

Introduction Contact lens discomfort (CLD) acts as a challenging problem, and the associated conjunctival microbiome changes were unclear. Material and Methods Conjunctival sac swab samples were collected from 12 eyes of nonwearers (NW), 12 eyes of asymptomatic contact lens (ACL) wearers, and 11 eyes of CLD. The V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to investigate differences among three groups. Results No differences in alpha diversity were observed among the three groups. The beta diversity showed a distinct microbiome composition between ACL and CLD group (P = 0.018) with principal coordinate analysis. The relative abundance of Firmicutes was significantly higher in CLD (48.18%) than in ACL (13.21%) group (P = 0.018). The abundance of Bacillus in patients with ACL (0.05%) or with CLD (0.02%) were significantly lower than that in the NW (1.27%) group (P = 0.024, 0.028, respectively). Moreover, the abundance of Firmicutes was positively correlated with the OSDI scores in CLD patients (r = 0.817, P < 0. 01, Spearman). Discussions Patients with CLD have various degrees of bacterial microbiota imbalance in the conjunctival sac, compared with NW and ACL groups. Conclusion Firmicutes may serve as a potential biomarker for the CLD patients.

Impact of Acanthamoeba Keratitis on the Vision-Related Quality of Life of Contact Lens Wearers.

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) caused by contact lens (CL) use on vision-related quality of life (VRQOL) and the sociodemographic factors and disease outcome associated with VRQOL. Sixty-one CL-associated AK cases and 59 asymptomatic CL wearers (mean age ±SD 39.4 ± 16.5 vs. 45.5 ± 15.2 yrs, P = 0.04) were recruited from Moorfields Eye Hospital and Institute for Optometry, London. AK cases were surveyed during active disease and were stratified into "poor" and "good" outcomes based on clinical features. VRQOL was measured using Rasch-transformed scores from the Emotional, Mobility, and Reading domains of the 32-item Impact of Visual Impairment questionnaire. AK cases were compared with controls and "poor" outcomes compared with "good" with multivariable linear regression. Multivariable linear regression models were also used to identify the sociodemographic factors and disease outcome associated with VRQOL. AK was associated with significant and substantial reductions in all 3 evaluated domains of VRQOL (Reading -59.6%, Mobility -59.8%, and Emotional -66.2%) compared with controls, independent of sociodemographic factors. Patients with AK who experienced poor outcomes, those who were of British White race (compared with all other races) and female, had lower VRQOL scores across all domains. Patients with AK with lower incomes scored worse on Reading and Mobility domains, whereas those with lower education had poorer Emotional scores. AK has a considerable detrimental impact on VRQOL. Clinicians should consider the importance of referring patients with AK for rehabilitative support and counseling as part of active disease management.

Role of diurnal variation of corneal sensory processing in contact lens discomfort

PurposeTo examine the diurnal variation of corneal threshold and suprathreshold sensory processing, symptoms, and tear secretion in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers and controls. Methods26 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic CL wearers and 15 asymptomatic non-CL wearing controls participated. Cooling thresholds, symptoms and tear meniscus height (TMH) were measured on each of 3 measurement days (random order) on the following schedules; Day-1 within 1 h of awakening (Baseline) and 3, 6 and 9 h later, Day-2 baseline and 9 h later (CLs worn in CL group) and Day-3 baseline and 9 h later. Magnitudes estimates for threshold-scaled suprathreshold stimuli were also estimated on Day-3. Data were analyzed using mixed models and repeated measures ANOVA. ResultsCooling thresholds for the symptomatic group were lower and decreased over Day-1 (p < 0.008) and after 8 h of CL wear on Day-2 (p < 0.001) and were paralleled by increased symptoms (all p < 0.001), whereas minimal variations were found in the asymptomatic and control groups. Magnitude estimates for suprathreshold stimuli were higher (p ≤ 0.002) in the symptomatic group but did not differ significantly over the day. TMH varied little over time and was lower in the symptomatic group, but the difference was not statistically significant. ConclusionCorneal sensitivity and symptoms, but not TMH, increased diurnally irrespective of CL wear in symptomatic CL wearers. These results reveal the essential role of neurosensory abnormalities in CL discomfort and suggest involvement of a central mechanism in the diurnally increased symptoms of these patients.

Lipid deposition on contact lenses in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers

PurposeLipid deposition on contact lenses (CL) has traditionally been believed to reduce comfort during CL wear. The purpose of this study was to quantify lipid deposition on CL in a group of symptomatic and asymptomatic adapted CL wearers. MethodsThis was a single-masked, randomized clinical trial. Only confirmed symptomatic (comfortable lens wear time (CWT) < 8 h and a noticeable reduction in comfort over the course of the day) and asymptomatic (CWT > 10 h and minimal reduction in comfort over the course of the day) participants were recruited to participate in the study. Participants wore senofilcon A lenses in combination with a polyquaternium-based care solution (OPTI-FREE Replenish). Worn CL samples were collected on Day 14. Deposited lipid amounts from the lenses (including cholesteryl ester, cholesterol and triolein) were quantified using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry technique. ResultsLipid deposition was significantly higher in CL extracts of asymptomatic wearers compared to the symptomatic wearers for all lipid types quantified, including cholesteryl ester (2.1 ± 0.6 vs 1.6 ± 0.5 log μg/lens), cholesterol (1.5 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.3 log μg/lens) and triolein (0.3 ± 0.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.1 log μg/lens) (all p < 0.002). The amount of cholesteryl ester deposited was greatest (p = 0.0001), followed by cholesterol, then triolein, for both the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups (both p = 0.0001). ConclusionThis study demonstrated that the asymptomatic group deposited a significantly greater amount of lipid on their CL. Although lipid levels measured are considered low to trigger any observable clinical deposition, they may influence other clinical outcomes, particularly comfort.

Value of routine evaluation in asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers

ObjectivesLimited literature supports the value of routine contact lens examinations. The purpose of this study is to document complications diagnosed when subjectively successful planned replacement soft contact lens patients are evaluated to renew their existing contact lens prescriptions. MethodsAsymptomatic soft contact lens patients who presented to the University Eye Center at Ketchum Health (Anaheim, CA) and the Eye and Vision Center at the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (Worcester, MA) for routine contact lens comprehensive exams to renew existing contact lens prescriptions were professionally evaluated and their complications documented. All subjects presented without complaint and had a history of subjectively successful planned replacement soft lens wear for at least 1 year. ResultsA total of 202 subjects were recruited from both sites (age range 16–72 years; 76 male, 126 female; spherical contact lens optical power equivalent range: +7.75D to −19.25D). Considering health issues, one hundred and five (52%) patients were found to exhibit at least one undiagnosed complication (95% CI: 0.45-0.59): 70% were diagnosed with contact lens driven ocular complications; 54% were diagnosed with non-contact lens driven ocular health issues; and 4% showed signs of undiagnosed systemic disease. Of note, complication prevalence increases to 72% overall if both contact lens fit issues and contact lens care compliance problems are included as complications in analysis. ConclusionsA striking ocular health and contact lens complication rate in asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers is demonstrated across two different study sites. This data suggests that asymptomatic as well as symptomatic contact lens wearers require routine professional evaluations.

Conjunctival Neuropathic and Inflammatory Pain-Related Gene Expression with Contact Lens Wear and Discomfort

ABSTRACT Purpose: To identify alterations in neuropathic and inflammatory pain gene expression associated with contact lens (CL) wear and CL discomfort (CLD). Methods: Eight non-wearers, eight asymptomatic CL wearers (CLWs) and eight symptomatic CLWs were included. Conjunctival cells were collected by impression cytology and the mRNA expression levels of 85 genes were analyzed. Differentially expressed genes between non-wearers and CLWs and between asymptomatic and symptomatic CLWs were analyzed. An enrichment analysis was also performed. Results: Twelve genes were upregulated (including IL10, PDYN and PENK) and 28 downregulated (CCL2, IL1A, IL1B, IL2 and NGF) in CLWs (p ≤ 0.050). Eleven genes were upregulated (CCL2, IL1A, IL1B, IL2 and NGF) and nine downregulated (PDYN and PENK) in symptomatic CLWs (p ≤ 0.035). Enriched overrepresented terms were related to pain, neuronal transmission and inflammation. Conclusion: Contact lens wear might produce a desensitization-like mechanism responsible for comfortable CL wear. A malfunction of this mechanism might contribute to CLD.

Inflammatory mediators and substance p in tears during contact lens discomfort

Purpose: To analyze whether the concentration of inflammatory mediators and substance P in tears of symptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers (CLW) is associated with the appearance of CL discomfort (CLD) and compare them with asymptomatic CLW.

Assessment of wheat germ agglutinin staining of the ocular surface in contact lens wearers and non-contact lens wearers

Purpose: Fluorescein-labeled wheat germ agglutinin (F-WGA) can act as a clinical marker for the presence of the ocular surface glycocalyx. This study sought to investigate whether the degree of F-WGA fluorescence observed at the ocular surface differed between symptomatic contact lens wearers, asymptomatic contact lens wearers and non-contact lens wearers.

Substance P Level in Tears as a Potential Biomarker for Contact Lens Discomfort

ABSTRACT Purpose: To analyze the effects of contact lens (CL) wear, time of the day, and CL discomfort (CLD) on clinical signs, tear inflammatory mediators and substance P. Methods: Thirty symptomatic and 30 asymptomatic CL wearers attended two visits (morning and afternoon) on two days (non-CL and CL wearing days). Comfort, meniscus area, noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT), tear collection, hyperemia, lid parallel conjunctival folds, fluorescein staining, and sensitivity were performed. The tear levels of 23 inflammatory mediators and substance P were measured. Results: Comfort, meniscus area, NIBUT, and MMP-9 were lower while conjunctival staining and EGF higher (p ≤ 0.015) on the CL wearing day. Comfort, IL-8/CXCL8, and VEGF were lower while EGF, IP-10/CXCL10, and MCP-1/CCL2 higher (p ≤ 0.047) in the afternoon. Comfort was lower and substance P higher (p ≤ 0.006) in symptomatic wearers. Conclusion: Substance P may be implicated in CLD etiology; its role and potential application as a biomarker should be further studied.

The impact of contact lens wear on ocular surface mucins using a novel clinical fluorescence imaging system

PurposeFluorescein-labelled wheat germ agglutinin (F-WGA) acts as a marker for ocular surface mucins. This clinical study sought to investigate whether the degree of F-WGA fluorescence observed at the ocular surface differed between symptomatic contact lens wearers, asymptomatic contact lens wearers and non-contact lens wearers, using a novel imaging system. MethodsTwenty-five participants (10 symptomatic contact lens wearers, 10 asymptomatic contact lens wearers and 5 non-contact lens wearers) attended a single study visit. Photographs of the cornea, bulbar and tarsal conjunctiva were captured following application of F-WGA solution. ResultsThe imaging system captured high-resolution images of F-WGA fluorescence at the ocular surface. The degree of fluorescence differed between the ocular surface regions (p < 0.001). A significant difference in fluorescence was observed between participant groups for the cornea (p = 0.01), with both the symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers showing lower fluorescence than the non-lens wearers. F-WGA associated fluorescence appeared diminished in the lid wiper region of the symptomatic lens wearers, compared to the asymptomatic group (p = 0.025). ConclusionThe use of F-WGA as a clinical marker for ocular surface mucins allows an improved understanding of their distribution across the ocular surface. Contact lens wear appears to negatively impact mucin density across the ocular surface, with the most marked effect on the cornea. F-WGA fluorescence appeared diminished in the lid wiper region for the symptomatic contact lens wearing group, indicating that mechanical interaction in this region may play a role in the aetiology of contact lens discomfort. Given the ability of F-WGA to disclose mucin distribution across the ocular surface it is likely to be a key clinical tool in furthering our understanding of (i) the aetiology of contact lens related discomfort, (ii) contact lens designs/materials to minimise interaction with the ocular surface and (iii) dry eye disease and other ocular surface diseases.

The ability of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8 to detect ocular surface alterations in contact lens wearers.

To study whether some ocular surface alterations could be associated with contact lens (CL) wearers suffering from CL discomfort (CLD) detected using the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8. Forty-one soft CL wearers further classified into symptomatic CL wearers (SCLW) and asymptomatic CL wearers (ACLW) by the CLDEQ-8, and 20 non CL wearers (NCLW) were included. Tear osmolarity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy findings, tear film break-up time, corneal and conjunctival staining, and Schirmer test were performed 24 h after CL removal. Data were compared among groups using the analysis of variance and the Student t-test or the Kruskal-Wallis H and the Mann-Whitney U tests, applying the Bonferroni correction. Correlations between the CLDEQ-8 and the clinical signs were performed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Twenty-four SCLW, 17 ACLW and 20 NCLW were recruited. There were significant differences among groups for tear osmolarity (p < 0.001), limbal hyperaemia (p = 0.014), and tarsal hyperaemia (p = 0.031). Pairwise comparisons revealed that SCLW and ACLW had higher tear osmolarity (p < 0.003, both comparisons) and limbal hyperaemia (p = 0.027 and p = 0.048, respectively) than NCLW. Moreover, SCLW had higher tarsal hyperaemia (p = 0.030) than NCLW. No significant correlations were found (p > 0.05). The CLDEQ-8 was ineffective to detect clinical alterations between SCLW and ACLW; therefore, the use of questionnaires alone remains being the best approach to detect CLD. The role of the tarsal conjunctiva in the development of CLD should be analyzed in future studies.

Tear film inflammatory cytokine upregulation in contact lens discomfort

PurposeTo investigate the ocular inflammatory response, using clinical and immunological techniques, in people experiencing contact lens (CL) discomfort. MethodsThis study involved 38 adults who were full-time, silicone-hydrogel CL wearers. Participants were categorized into groups based upon a validated CL dry-eye questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) (n = 17 ‘asymptomatic’, CLDEQ-8 score <9; n = 21 ‘symptomatic’, CLDEQ-8 score ≥13). Examinations were performed at two visits (one with, and one without, CL wear), separated by one-week. Testing included: tear osmolarity, ocular redness, tear stability, ocular surface staining, meibography, tear production and tear collection. Tear osmolarity was taken from the inferior-lateral and superior-lateral menisci. The ‘Inferior-Superior Osmotic Difference’, I-SOD, was the absolute osmolarity difference between these menisci. Concentrations of seven cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha) were assayed from basal tears using multiplex cytometric bead array. ResultsAt baseline, there was no significant difference in key clinical signs between asymptomatic and symptomatic CL wearers (p > 0.05). The I-SOD was greater in symptomatic than asymptomatic CL wearers (23.1 ± 2.6 versus 11.3 ± 1.4 mOsmol/L, p = 0.001). People experiencing CL discomfort had higher tear IL-17A (122.6 ± 23.7 versus 44.0 ± 10.0 pg/mL, p = 0.02) and reduced tear stability (6.3 ± 1.1 versus 10.4 ± 1.6 s, p = 0.03) after several hours of CL wear. Tear IL-17A levels correlated with both the I-SOD (r = 0.43, p = 0.01) and CLDEQ-8 score (r = 0.40, p = 0.01). ConclusionsCL discomfort occurs in individuals having no clinical dry eye signs, and is associated with higher tear levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-17A. These findings support an association between the discomfort response and low-grade, ocular surface inflammation.

Are Contact Lens Discomfort or Soft Contact Lens Material Properties Associated with Alterations in the Corneal Sub-Basal Nerve Plexus?

ABSTRACTPurpose: To study whether contact lens (CL) discomfort and some properties of soft CL materials are associated with alterations in the nerve fibers morphology and density of dendritic cells of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus.Materials and Methods: Forty soft CL wearers and 20 non-CL wearers were included. The Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-short form was administered to divide CL wearers based on their symptoms (20 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic CL wearers were included). The CL material properties considered were the CL material type (16 hydrogel and 24 silicone hydrogel CL wearers were included), water content, oxygen transmissibility, and modulus of elasticity. Confocal microscopy was performed, and the number and density of corneal nerves, density of nerve branches, grade of nerve tortuosity, and density of dendritic cells were analyzed. The effects of CL discomfort and CL material properties on the confocal microscopy parameters were analyzed.Results: No significant differences were found among symptomatic and asymptomatic CL wearers and non-CL wearers in any of the confocal microscopy parameters evaluated. The density of dendritic cells was higher in the hydrogel CL wearers compared to the silicone hydrogel CL wearers and non-CL wearers (p = 0.002). The density of dendritic cells tended to be higher as the oxygen transmissibility decreased (β = −0.40, p = 0.07).Conclusions: CL discomfort appears not to be associated with alterations in the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus. Hydrogel CL wear might be involved in the recruitment of dendritic cells into the cornea, being a possible origin its lower oxygen permeability compared to silicone hydrogel materials. Future studies are required to confirm these results.

Differences in Tear Film Biochemistry of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Lens Wearers.

The concentration of selected proteins and inflammatory mediators in tears of symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers were quantified. The level of leukotriene B4 was higher in the symptomatic group. This may suggest that inflammation can be the cause of discomfort sensation at the end of day. The present study aims to quantify the concentration of selected tear lipids and proteins in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Unstimulated evening tears were collected using glass capillary tubes from 45 healthy, adapted contact lens wearers. Twenty-two had self-described symptoms of dryness and discomfort with contact lenses and 23 were asymptomatic. Tear proteins were assayed using selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Enzyme immunoassay kits were used to measure prostaglandins, leukotriene B4, and cysteinyl leukotrienes. Ocular comfort was rated on a scale of 1 to 100 at the time of tear collection. The average evening comfort level was above 70 for the asymptomatic (83.96 ± 9.51, mean ± SE) and equal or below 70 for the symptomatic group (57.28 ± 12.38) (P < .001). LTB4 was significantly higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic contact lens wearers (0.32 ± 0.06 ng/μL vs. 0.17 ± 0.04 ng/μL, respectively; P = .03). Lysozyme was slightly but not significantly lower in symptomatic subjects (symptomatic 0.58 ± 0.10 mg/mL vs. asymptomatic 1.73 ± 0.46 mg/mL; P = .10). The levels of lactoferrin, lipocalin 1, proline-rich 4, prolactin-induced protein, prostaglandins, and cysteinyl leukotrienes were unchanged (P > .1) between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. The LTB4 concentration was significantly higher in symptomatic contact lens wearers compared to the asymptomatic group, and this may partly mediate the discomfort response during lens wear in the symptomatic lens wearers. No other differences were found in the level of tear factors of interest between the two groups.

Temporal changes in contact lens comfort over a day of wear.

Contact lens discomfort continues to be reported as the primary reason for soft lens discontinuation, regardless of new modalities and materials. The purpose of this analysis of comfort related data from a series of clinical studies was to review whether there was a difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic habitual lens wearers' comfort responses over the course of the day. Data from five independent non-dispensing clinical studies were pooled and analysed. Participants in these studies were assigned to one of two groups depending on whether they were classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic contact lens wearers according to a modified Subjective Evaluation of Symptoms of Dryness (SESOD) questionnaire. Masked participants were randomised to wear either a hydrogel or a silicone hydrogel contact lens and their ocular comfort was rated using a visual analogue scale on insertion and 2-hourly during an 8-hour period of a single lens wearing day. Data from 103 participants were used, 58 in the symptomatic group and 45 in the asymptomatic group as determined by the SESOD questionnaire. There was no effect of lens material on comfort (p=0.43). However, there was a significant interaction between symptoms and time. The difference in mean comfort between the symptomatic and asymptomatic group was significant at each time point (p<0.05). However, comfort did not vary significantly over the day for the asymptomatic group (p=0.87), whereas, there was a significant decline in mean comfort ratings for the symptomatic group from 84.6±13.2 (S.D.) at insertion to 73.0±18.5 at 8hours (p<0.001). In our study, changes in contact lens comfort over a day were independent of lens material but not symptoms. Symptomatic lens wearers reported a progressive decrease in comfort, whereas asymptomatic wearers did not. Therefore, asymptomatic wearers should not be used when measuring contact lens comfort in clinical studies. The exclusion of asymptomatic lens wearers would likely increase the sensitivity of comfort ratings as a measure in contact lens research.

Hypersensitivity to Cold Stimuli in Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers.

To examine the cooling thresholds and the estimated sensation magnitude at stimulus detection in controls and symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers, to determine whether detection thresholds depend on the presence of symptoms of dryness and discomfort. Forty-nine adapted CL wearers and 15 non-lens wearing controls had room temperature pneumatic thresholds measured using a custom Belmonte esthesiometer, during Visits 1 and 2 (Baseline CL), Visit 3 (2 weeks no CL wear), and Visit 4 (2 weeks after resuming CL wear). CL wearers were subdivided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups based on comfortable wearing time (CWT) and CLDEQ-8 score (<8 hours CWT and ≥14 CLDEQ-8 stratified the symptom groups). Detection thresholds were estimated using an ascending method of limits and each threshold was the average of the three first-reported flow rates. The magnitude of intensity, coolness, irritation, and pain at detection of the stimulus were estimated using a 1-100 scale (1 very mild, 100 very strong). In all measurement conditions, the symptomatic CL wearers were the most sensitive, the asymptomatic CL wearers were the least sensitive, and the control group was between the two CL wearing groups (group factor p < 0.001, post hoc asymptomatic vs. symptomatic group, all p's < 0.015). Similar patterns were found for the estimated magnitude of intensity and irritation (group effect p = 0.027 and 0.006 for intensity and irritation, respectively) but not for cooling (p > 0.05) at detection threshold. Symptomatic CL wearers have higher cold detection sensitivity and report greater intensity and irritation sensation at stimulus detection than the asymptomatic wearers. Room temperature pneumatic esthesiometry may help to better understand the process of sensory adaptation to CL wear.

Association Between Contact Lens Discomfort and Pre-lens Tear Film Kinetics.

The relationship between contact lens wettability and comfort has been extensively evaluated; however, a direct correlation between the characteristics of the pre-lens tear film and the symptoms associated with contact lens discomfort has yet to be established. In addition, there is relatively limited knowledge relating to the entire tear film kinetics during the inter-blink period in contact lens wearers. The purpose of this analysis was to identify the characteristics of the pre-lens tear film kinetics that may be associated with the symptoms of contact lens discomfort. The study population comprised 202 soft (hydrogel and silicone hydrogel) contact lens wearers attending pre-screening visits at the OTG-i research clinic. All participants completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and the tear film was quantified via post hoc, masked analysis of high definition digital Tearscope videos recorded at the visit. The tear film kinetics of the least symptomatic wearers (OSDI lowest quintile scores, n = 45) were compared to the tear film kinetics of the most symptomatic wearers (OSDI highest quintile scores, n = 43). The hypothesis tested was that the tear film kinetics of asymptomatic wearers were better than tear film kinetics of symptomatic wearers. The distribution of lens types worn was as follows: Daily Disposable 46.5%, 1-Month Replacement 39.6%, and 2-Week Replacement 13.6%. 48.2% of lenses were silicone hydrogel and 51.8% hydrogel. Symptomatic wearers had a shorter break-up time (4.7 s vs. 6.0 s; p = 0.003), lesser surface coverage by the tear film during the interblink period (95.1% vs. 98.5%; p < 0.001) and greater surface exposure at the time of the blink (9.4% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.001). The current study demonstrated that the tear film kinetics of asymptomatic and symptomatic contact lens wearers were different, the findings supporting the hypothesis of poorer tear film kinetics for symptomatic than asymptomatic wearers in a general contact lens wearing population.

Time Course of Changes in Goblet Cell Density in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Contact Lens Wearers.

To investigate longitudinal changes in goblet cell density (GCD) in contact lens (CL) wearers who do and do not develop symptoms of dry eye (DE). Sixty healthy individuals fitted with daily disposable hydrogel CLs and 23 age-balanced non-CL-wearing controls underwent assessment using the 5-item dry eye questionnaire, noninvasive tear film break-up time measurement, ocular surface assessment, and phenol red thread test evaluation. Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) were used to assess GCD at baseline and follow-up visits at 1 week and 1 and 6 months. After 1 week, all CL wearers were categorized as those who were and were not symptomatic based on responses to the CL dry eye questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8). A linear mixed-model was used to examine changes in GCD over time. The global mean GCD of the 83 participants at baseline (before CL wear) was 476 ± 41 and 467 ± 52 cells/mm2 using LSCM and CIC, respectively. After 6 months of CL wear, GCD was reduced by approximately 13% and 29% in asymptomatic (N = 29) and symptomatic (N = 17) CL wearers (all P < 0.001), respectively, observed with both LSCM and CIC. Contact lens wear induces a reduction of GCD over 6 months, which is exacerbated in those with DE symptoms. Either LSCM or CIC can be used to assess GCD in the conjunctiva.