Asymptomatic Brain Metastases Research Articles

Serum uric acid level can predict asymptomatic brain metastasis at diagnosis in patients with small cell lung cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the relationship between serum uric acid level at diagnosis and asymptomatic brain metastasis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.MethodsA total of 69 patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer without symptomatic brain metastases, whose serum uric acid level was measured at the time of diagnosis, were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into two groups as those with and without asymptomatic brain metastases. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups, and Spearman’s correlation test was used for correlation analysis. The cut-off level of serum uric acid level was analyzed, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates were determined for brain metastasis. Independent factors affecting asymptomatic brain metastasis were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis.ResultsThe median serum uric acid level of all patients was 6.9 mg/dL. Twenty-two percent of patients had asymptomatic brain metastases, and serum uric acid levels were significantly higher in these patients (P = 0.0014). The cut-off value for serum uric acid level was calculated as 6.2 mg/dL. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this value for brain metastasis were 84%, 76%, and 78%, respectively. High serum uric acid level was an independent risk factor for asymptomatic brain metastasis (OR 3.446 95% CI 1.337–5.480; P = 0.005).ConclusionIn conclusion, a serum uric acid level of 6.2 mg/dL and above at the time of diagnosis may predict asymptomatic brain metastasis in patients.

Efficacy of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients with Melanoma and Brain Metastases-A Danish Real-World Cohort.

Combination immunotherapy using ipilimumab/nivolumab is the golden standard treatment for patients with melanoma and asymptomatic brain metastases (MBM). However, it remains uncertain if real-world patients have the same treatment effects compared to patients enrolled in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to compare clinical benefits between real-world patients and patients enrolled in clinical trials when administering ipilimumab/nivolumab in treatment-naive patients with asymptomatic MBM. Using data from the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED), 79 patients with clinical parameters similar to the inclusion criteria from two phase II trials, the ABC and the CheckMate-204 trials, were included in the analyses. Thirteen patients (16.5%) achieved complete response (CR) and an overall response rate (ORR) of 46.9%. We found an overall 6-month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) rate of 53.5% and a median PFS of 6.5 months. Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached during the 5-year follow-up. These results were comparable to the phase II trials. In conclusion, clinical benefits from phase II studies were comparable to Danish real-world data regarding OS, PFS, and CR. Confirming that combination immunotherapy can be recommended as first-line treatment for patients with asymptomatic, treatment-naive melanoma brain metastases.

Protocol for a systematic review with prospective individual patient data meta-analysis in EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastases to assess the effect of SRS+osimertinib compared to osimertinib alone: the STARLET Collaboration

BackgroundPatients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are a heterogeneous population who often develop brain metastases (BM). The optimal...

DeLLphi-301: Tarlatamab phase 2 trial in small cell lung cancer (SCLC)—Efficacy and safety analyzed by presence of brain metastasis.

8015 Background: Brain metastases affect 40%–70% of patients with SCLC. Tarlatamab, a BiTE (bispecific T-cell engager) immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3, demonstrated durable responses and promising survival outcomes in patients with previously treated SCLC (10 mg Q2W) (DeLLphi-301; NCT05060016; Ahn M-J, N Engl J Med 2023). Here, tarlatamab efficacy and safety in patients with baseline brain metastases from DeLLphi-301 are reported. Methods: The DeLLphi-301 study design has been published. Patients with treated, stable, asymptomatic brain metastases were included. Subgroup analyses for efficacy (blinded independent central review [BICR] assessments) and safety by presence or absence of baseline brain metastases were performed. Intracranial activity was assessed. Post enrollment, brain imaging was performed if clinically indicated. Results: As of 27 June 2023, 186 patients had received tarlatamab (ECOG PS: 0–1; median prior lines of therapy: 2; median follow-up: 13.6 months). 29% of patients (54/186) had treated and stable brain metastases at baseline. Most patients (91%) with brain metastases had received prior local radiotherapy; 6% each had received surgery only or both radiotherapy and surgery. Overall systemic objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1) was 45.3% in patients with brain metastases and 32.6% in patients without brain metastases (Table). Any grade immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome and associated neurological events occurred in 24.1% of patients with brain metastases and in 13.6% of patients without brain metastases; grade ≥ 3 events occurred in the 100 mg group only: 9.4% and 1.8%, respectively, and did not lead to tarlatamab discontinuation in any patient with brain metastases. Analysis of intracranial activity will be presented. Conclusions: Tarlatamab showed promising efficacy and a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with previously treated SCLC and stable brain metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT05060016 . [Table: see text]

Safety and efficacy of first-in-class CXCR1/2 inhibitor SX-682 in combination with pembrolizumab (pem) in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (mMEL) with disease progression on anti–PD-1 therapy.

9508 Background: Outcomes for pts with mMEL remain sobering despite access to available immunotherapies as the majority of pts are resistant or become refractory to checkpoint blockade with no approved treatments. CXCR1 and CXCR2 (CXCR1/2) signaling mediate myeloid immunosuppression and MEL growth, inversely correlating with anti-PD-1 response and pt survival. SX-682 is an oral allosteric inhibitor of CXCR1/2. As a single agent, SX-682 increases tumor CD8+ T cell infiltration and inhibits tumor growth in mouse MEL. Methods: This phase 1 dose-escalation with expansion trial (NCT03161431) evaluated pem and escalating doses of SX-682 (25 - 400 mg orally BID) in pts with mMEL in a 21-day cycle. Pts must have had progressive disease (PD) on prior anti-PD-1. Mucosal MEL and asymptomatic brain metastases were allowed. Escalation cohorts had a 21-day SX-682 monotherapy (MONO) run-in. Response assessment by RECIST 1.1 was every 2 cycles during combination (COMBO) treatment. Primary endpoint was safety: adverse events (AEs), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximally-tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR; complete [CR] + partial [PR] response), disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease [SD]) and overall survival (OS). Results: As of October 2023, 51 pts were enrolled and treated; median age of 65 (range 24-91), 55% male, 61% elevated LDH, 39% BRAF mutated. All pts received prior anti-PD-1, 37 (73%) received combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4, and 23 (45%) had ≥ 3 prior therapies. Steady-state blood SX-682 was dose-proportional. No MONO DLT or MTD was identified. The 200 mg dose cohort was expanded in COMBO based on safety and pharmacodynamics: mg BID dose (n) = 25 (3), 50 (3), 100 (6), 150 (8), 200 (31). Any grade and grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 75% and 43%, respectively, and discontinuation (DC) due to TRAEs in 20% (when uncomplicated neutropenia, a permitted effect from CXCR2 inhibition on bone-marrow trafficking, was excluded there were 25% grade 3/4 TRAEs and 12% DC [rash, transaminitis]). There was no infectious signal. At the 200 mg dose, the ORR was 21% in 19 evaluable pts (4 PR + 0 CR) and the DCR was 63% (8 SD + 4 PR). DCR significantly depended on SX-682 dose ( P vs. ≤100 mg): 0% (0/9) at ≤100 mg, 50% (3/6) at 150 mg ( P = 0.0440) and 63% (12/19) at 200 mg ( P = 0.0028). All 15 pts with disease control had progressed on anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4. Median OS was longer in pts in the 200 mg cohort (14.7 months; 95% CI, 10.5 – NR [not reached], n = 31) than in pts treated with ≤100 mg SX-682 (7.4 months; 95% CI, 5.0 – NR; n = 10). Conclusions: SX-682 combined with pem had a tolerable safety profile and activity reflected by objective responses and clinically meaningful disease control in heavily pretreated mMEL pts with progression on anti-PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4. Clinical trial information: NCT03161431 .

A phase II trial of monalizumab in combination with durvalumab (MEDI4736) plus platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer (MOZART): Hoosier Cancer Research Network LUN21-530 study.

TPS8129 Background: Chemoimmunotherapy consisting of platinum, etoposide, and PD-L1 inhibitor remains the standard of care first-line treatment for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) yielding median overall survival (OS) of slightly over a year. NKG2A/CD94 is an immune checkpoint that is selectively expressed on natural killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment. When engaging with its ligand, HLA-E, NKG2A transduces inhibitory signals that suppress immune-mediated cytotoxicity. Thus, NKG2A blockade enhances anti-tumor immunity by promoting both, NK and CD8+ T cell, effector functions. Monalizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting NKG2A, enhances NK cell activity against tumor cells and rescues CD8+ T cell function in combination with PD-(L)1 axis blockade. Pre-clinical data have demonstrated that the absence of NK cells substantially enhances metastatic dissemination of SCLC tumor cells in vivo. NK cell function is modulated in response to cytotoxic chemotherapy, especially platinum. Post-chemotherapy NK cells display an induced expression of NKG2A compared with pre-chemotherapy patients and is associated with a reduced NK cell mediated anti-tumor activity. Hyperactivation of NK cell activity ameliorates SCLC metastases, an effect that is enhanced when combined with anti PD-(L)1 therapy. Altogether, these data suggest that addition of monalizumab to standard of care first-line treatment may be associated with improved efficacy in patients with SCLC. Methods: Patients with extensive-stage SCLC with ECOG performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function are eligible for enrollment on this single-arm phase II study with an initial safety lead-in cohort. Patients may have received one prior cycle of platinum doublet with or without durvalumab and may have treated or untreated asymptomatic brain metastasis. Patients will receive platinum (cis or carbo), etoposide, durvalumab, and monalizumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by durvalumab and monalizumab every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints include 1-year progression-free survival, safety, and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, 1-year overall survival, and intracranial progression-free survival. Exploratory objectives include analyzing association of treatment efficacy with minimal residual disease status, blood- and tissue-based genomic and transcriptomic signatures, tumor infiltrating immune cells, and peripheral blood NK cell and CD8+ T cell activity. Five of the planned 30 patients have been enrolled to date. Clinical trial information: NCT05903092 .

Efficacy of encorafenib/binimetinib in patients with metastatic melanoma with brain metastases: Results from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry.

9528 Background: Data on the effectiveness of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with melanoma brain metastases (BMs) are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of encorafenib/binimetinib treatment in melanoma patients with BMs. Methods: All melanoma patients with BMs treated with encorafenib/binimetinib between 2019 and 2023 in the Netherlands were included from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Patients with prior BRAF/MEK inhibition treatment were excluded. We analyzed overall response rates (ORR), progression-free (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from start of encorafenib/binimetinib. We performed subgroup analysis for symptomatic versus asymptomatic BMs and previous treatment versus no previous treatment. Results: In total, 208 patients were included. Median age was 61 years and 58.2% of the patients was male. Lactate dehydrogenase levels were elevated in 48.1% of the patients and symptomatic BMs were present in 63.5%. Of all patients, 41.8% received prior immunotherapy and for 58.2% encorafenib/binimetinib was the first-line treatment. The median follow-up duration was 23.2 months. The ORR was 67.3%. Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9-6.2) and median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.6-14.0). OS was significantly shorter in patients with symptomatic BMs versus asymptomatic BMs (median 9.7 versus 22.9 months, p<0.01), while PFS was similar (median 5.6 versus 5.8 months, p=0.07). Previously untreated patients had worse prognostic characteristics than previously treated patients. PFS was not significantly different between patients with versus without previous systemic treatment (median 8.8 versus 5.2 months, p=0.08), while OS from start of encorafenib/binimetinib was longer for previously treated patients (median 15.9 versus 9.6 months, p<0.01). Conclusions: Encorafenib plus binimetinib has clinical activity in real world melanoma patients with BMs, but PFS and OS are shorter than previously reported for patients without brain metastases. These data may aid physicians in clinical decision-making.

Abstract PO2-27-09: Clinical impact of routine MRI screening for brain metastases in patients with HER2 positive or triple negative metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: Routine screening for brain metastases (BMs) is currently not recommended in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). There is a growing consensus on the need for the screening of BMs in HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) because 40% of patients experience BMs throughout the disease course and systemic treatment options with intracranial efficacy are now available. However, there is a lack of prospective study data on this matter. We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the role of brain MRI screening for the patient with metastatic BC. Methods: Patients who newly diagnosed metastatic HER2+ or TNBC were eligible. Screening brain MRI was planned at diagnosis and failure from first line and second line of systemic therapy. All patients underwent complete physical examination and comprehensive neurologic assessment at baseline and thereafter. Patients who diagnosed symptomatic BMs were dropped from the study and subsequent treatment including local therapies and survival data were collected. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients diagnosed with asymptomatic BMs. Results: A total of 147 patients were enrolled between Sep 2018 and Aug 2023 at Yonsei Cancer Center. The median age was 51 years (range, 29-80) and most patients (92.5%, n=136) had good performance status (ECOG 0-1). The tumor subtypes were as follows: TNBC, 51.0%; HER2 (ER-, HER2+), 29.3%; luminal-HER2 (ER+, HER2+), 19.7%. The cumulative incidence of asymptomatic BMs was 20.4% for overall patients; 24.0% for TNBC (18/75), 14.0% for HER2 (6/43), and 20.7% for luminal HER2 (6/29). Symptomatic detection of BMs during study period was 14.7% for TNBC, 18.6% for HER2, and 6.9% for luminal-HER2. Initial local treatment was stereotactic radiosurgery in 30 patients (58.8%), whole-brain radiation therapy in 14 patients (27.5%), surgical resection in 2 patients (3.9%) and 6 patients (11.8%) did not receive any treatment for BMs. After a median follow-up of 20.1 months, the median overall survival following a diagnosis of BMs was 23.7 vs 7.3 months (hazard ratio 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.95; P = .04) in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic BMs, respectively. Conclusions: We identified approximately 20% of patients with HER2+ or TNBC as asymptomatic BMs. Emerging systemic therapies showed promising intracranial response would warrant the detection of asymptomatic BMs through routine MRI screening. Incidence of brain metastases by subtypes Citation Format: Gun Min Kim, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Min Hwan Kim, Seul-Gi Kim, Hyung Soon Park, Jong Hee Jang, Yong Bae Kim, Seung-koo Lee. Clinical impact of routine MRI screening for brain metastases in patients with HER2 positive or triple negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-27-09.

Abstract PO1-19-11: Phase 3 Study of Tucatinib or Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab as Maintenance Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (HER2CLIMB-05, Trial in Progress)

Abstract Background The current first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC) for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is trastuzumab (T) plus pertuzumab (P) and a taxane. Despite advances in 1L SOC, most patients progress during maintenance therapy with T+P. Tucatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in combination with T and capecitabine for adults with HER2+ MBC, with and without brain metastases (BM). In HER2CLIMB, addition of tucatinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with HER2+ MBC and was well tolerated. Adding tucatinib also reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with untreated and/or active BM (Murthy et al. NEJM 2020, Curigliano et al. Ann Oncol 2022). HER2CLIMB-05 investigates whether adding tucatinib to 1L SOC as maintenance therapy will extend PFS while maintaining quality of life (QOL). Methods HER2CLIMB-05 (NCT05132582) is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study evaluating tucatinib plus T+P as maintenance therapy for HER2+ MBC. Approximately 650 patients will be enrolled. Eligible patients will have advanced HER2+ disease, no progression on 4–8 cycles of prior 1L SOC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1, and no or asymptomatic BM. Exclusion criteria include prior treatment with anti-HER2 and/or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor TKI (prior SOC for early BC is permitted) or inability to undergo contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either tucatinib or placebo twice daily, with T+P once every 21 days. Patients with hormone receptor-positive disease may receive endocrine therapy. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints include OS, time to deterioration of health-related QOL, central nervous system PFS, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. PFS and OS will be compared using a two-sided stratified log-rank test between treatment groups. Time-to-event endpoints will be summarized using the Kaplan–Meier method. PK and safety data will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Enrollment is ongoing in Austria, Chile, Greece, Italy, Japan, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the US, and several other European, APAC, and LATAM countries. This abstract was previously presented at ESMO-BC 2022, FPN (Final Publication Number): 415, by Veronique Dieras (reused with permission). Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Junji Tsurutani, Giuseppe Curigliano, Miguel Martín, Ciara O'Sullivan, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Konstantinos Tryfonidis, Libero Santarpia, Shan Yang, Véronique Diéras. Phase 3 Study of Tucatinib or Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab as Maintenance Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (HER2CLIMB-05, Trial in Progress) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-11.

Abstract PS11-05: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in patients with HER2[+] or HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer and Pathologically Confirmed Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Results from Cohort 5 of the DEBBRAH Study

Abstract Background: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) occurs in approximately 5-15% of patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (ABC) and is associated with poor survival and a significant reduction in quality of life. The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown remarkable intracranial and extracranial activity, leading to its widespread clinical use. DEBBRAH is evaluating the efficacy and safety of T-DXd in pts with HER2[+] and HER2-low ABC with a history of brain metastases (BM) and/or LMC. Here, we report results from cohort 5 that included pts with pathologically confirmed LMC. Methods: DEBBRAH (NCT04420598) is a single-arm, open-label, five-cohort, phase 2 study conducted across 18 sites in Spain and Portugal. A total of 39 pts aged ≥18 years with pretreated HER2[+] or HER2-low ABC with stable, progressing, or untreated BM and/or LMC were enrolled in 5 cohorts: (1) HER2[+] ABC with non-progressing BM after radiotherapy and/or surgery; (2) HER2[+] or HER2-low ABC with asymptomatic untreated BM; (3) HER2[+] ABC with progressing BM after local treatment; (4) HER2-low ABC with progressing BM after local treatment; (5) HER2[+] or HER2-low ABC and LMC with positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Pts received 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd intravenously once every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint for cohort 5 was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response, clinical benefit rate (CBR) according to RANO-BM (intracranial lesions) and RECIST v.1.1 (extracranial and overall lesions); and safety and tolerability as per NCI-CTCAE v.5.0. OS was tested with the maximum likelihood exponential method (H0: median OS ≤2 months; H1: median OS≥6 months). We estimate that 7 pts are needed to attain an 80% power at the nominal level of one-sided α of 0.05. Results: Between Apr 14, 2021, and Apr 5, 2022, 7 pts were allocated into cohort 5. Median age was 57 (range, 42–69) years, 3 (42.9%) pts were HER2[+], 6 (85.7%) pts had synchronous extracranial metastases, 2 of whom (28.6%) also presented BM, and 3 (42.9%) pts had measurable disease. Median number of previous lines of therapy for advanced disease was 4 (range, 1-8) and no patient received prior local treatment for central nervous system involvement. At data cut-off (Apr 4, 2023), median follow-up was 12 months (range, 2.5-18.6). Median duration of treatment was 9.0 months (range, 2.1-18.6). Two (28.6%) pts remained on treatment: 1 HER2[+] and 1 HER2-low, after 18.6 and 12.0 months, respectively. Median OS rate was 13.3 months (95% CI, 5.7-NA, p< 0.001) meeting the primary endpoint. Among 5 pts with disease progression, none had intracranial progression. A total of 4 (57.1%) pts presented extracranial progression and 1 (14.3%) patient had clinical worsening. No objective responses were observed, but 5 out of 7 pts had prolonged stabilization (≥24 weeks) for an overall CBR of 71.4% (95% CI, 29.0-96.3) and a median PFS of 8.9 months (95% CI, 4.9-NA) according to RECIST v.1.1. The most common non-hematological treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade (G) were nausea (57.1%; 14.3% G3), fatigue (42.9%; 0% G3), vomiting (42.9%; 0% G3), headache (42.9%; 0% G3), and urinary tract infection (42.9%; 0% G3). Anemia (42.9%; 0% G3) and thrombocytopenia (28.6%; 14.3% G3) were the most frequent hematological TEAEs. No cases of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis were reported. Serious unrelated TEAEs occurred in 4 (57.1%) of 7 pts, and 1 patient experienced a related serious TEAE (nausea G3). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: T-DXd showed promising activity with no new safety concerns in HER2[+] and HER2-low pts with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed LMC. These encouraging data warrant further investigation to address the unmet need in this difficult-to-treat condition. Citation Format: Marta Vaz Batista, José Manuel Pérez-García, Laia Garrigós, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Patricia Cortez-Castedo, Fabriccio Racca, Salvador Blanch, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Adela Fernández, María Fernández-Abad, Vega Iranzo, Maria Gion, Griselda Martrat, Daniel Alcalá-López, Jhudit Pérez-Escuredo, Miguel Sampayo-Cordero, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Sofía Braga, Javier Cortés. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in patients with HER2[+] or HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer and Pathologically Confirmed Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Results from Cohort 5 of the DEBBRAH Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-05.

Pembrolizumab response in stage IV luminal-type breast cancer with high microsatellite instability: a case report

BackgroundPembrolizumab (PEM), an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), is often used for triple-negative breast cancer, but can also be used to treat solid tumors that exhibit high microsatellite instability (MSI-High). However, patients with breast cancer rarely have MSI-High, the use of PEM in such cases in clinical practice is uncertain due to lack of sufficient supporting data. Here, we report the case of a premenopausal woman in who received PEM for MSI-High luminal-type breast cancer.Case presentationA 40-year-old premenopausal Asian woman was diagnosed with stage IIA (T2N0M0) breast cancer and had an Oncotype DX recurrence score of 38. After surgery, she received 4 courses of chemotherapy with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide. After 3 months of tamoxifen therapy, the patient complained of abdominal pain due to right iliac metastasis, and biopsy of the metastatic lesion showed of luminal type; she was sequentially treated with fulvestrant, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and an anticancer drug (TS1), but over the next year, metastasis to the bone and para-aortic lymph nodes increased. Tumor was MSI-High; PEM was started, and after three courses, bone metastases were reduced, para-aortic lymph node metastases resolved, opioids were discontinued, and the patient returned to society; PEM was administered for 1 year with no worsening of bone metastases on imaging. Asymptomatic brain metastasis less than 1 cm was detected and gamma knife was performed. Six months after completion of PEM, the patient is working with no new lesions.ConclusionWe report a case of luminal-type breast cancer with bone metastases and MSI-High, which was treated with PEM and showed a rapid therapeutic response.

Serplulimab monotherapy in extensive-stagesmall-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: a case report.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with limited treatment options, especially for extensive-stage (ES) patients. We present a case of a 70-year-old male with ES-SCLC and asymptomatic brain metastasis who opted for immune monotherapy with serplulimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody). After four cycles, the patient achieved a confirmed partial response and a progression-free survival of over 1 year. Moreover, we observed a consistent decline in tumor biomarkers, and brain MRI indicated reduced metastatic activity. Remarkably, the patient tolerated the treatment well, with only mild diarrhea. This case highlights serplulimab's potential as a first-line treatment in select ES-SCLC patients, emphasizing the importance of further research on immunotherapy predictive biomarkers.

Melanoma Brain Metastases: Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Background. Brain metastases are one of the leading causes of death in melanoma patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to look at the variables that affect melanoma patients’ intracranial treatment responses to immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus up to December 2023 was conducted to identify trials investigating treatment response of melanoma brain metastasis. This meta-analysis presents summary estimates (SEs) of treatment response and odd ratios (ORs) for the comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic metastases. Generalised linear mixed models were used for the SE of the proportion of clinical responses and 95% CIs are reported. We investigated between-study heterogeneity using meta-regression. Results. We included 19 independent clinical trials for a total of 1074 patients with brain metastases. The SE of the overall response was 36% 95%CI [27%; 47%], I2 = 84%, similar to the SE for symptomatic metastases: SE = 29% 95%CI [16%; 47%], I2 = 80%. A significantly higher response of symptomatic metastases was observed between patients who had previously received immunotherapy compared to those who had not (47% vs. 9%, p-value = 0.001). The SE was greater for asymptomatic metastases (38% 95%CI [29%; 49%], I2 = 80%), and among these, patients that received the combo-immunotherapy importantly responded more than those who had received monotherapy (45% vs. 26.1%, p-value = 0.002). The major limit of our analysis is the absence of data about the specific intracranial response separately in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in seven studies. Conclusions. This study shows the importance of starting immunotherapy as early as possible in asymptomatic patients. Randomised trials with greater statistical power are needed to find the best strategies for symptomatic and asymptomatic brain metastases.

ROS1 Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient with Brain Metastases Who Overcame Crizotinib Resistance with Lorlatinib: Case Report

Background: ROS1-positive patients account for 1-2% of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Crizotinib is the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated in first line treatment of ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. However, crizotinib resistance is frequent within the first 12 months of treatment. Lorlatinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor of ROS-1 recently indicated for metastatic or locally advanced crizotinib-resistant NSCLC. Case report: We report a case of a 43-year-old female patient with no medical history, diagnosted with stage IVB NSCLC including asymptomatic brain metastasis, and harboring ROS1 rearrangement. Within the first three months of starting crizotinib, the patient showed on CT scan evaluation new bone and brain metastases. Lorlatinib in the second line revealed a noteworthy improvement in metastasis and primary lesion. Conclusion: Brain metastases frequently occur in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC at the time of diagnosis and treatment course. However the efficacy of crizotinib might not translate to intracranial control of the disease, one of the cause of resistance to this drug.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in melanoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastases: 7-year outcomes and quality of life from the multicenter phase III NIBIT-M2 trial

BackgroundThe primary analysis of the phase III NIBIT-M2 study showed a 41% 4-year overall survival (OS) of melanoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastases treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab. MethodsHere, we report the 7-year efficacy outcomes and the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) analyses of the NIBIT-M2 study. ResultsAs of May 1, 2023, at a median follow-up of 67 months (mo), the median OS was 8.5 (95% CI: 6.6–10.3), 8.2 (95% CI: 2.1–14.3) and 29.2 (95% CI: 0–69.9) mo for the fotemustine (F) Arm A, ipilimumab plus fotemustine Arm B, and ipilimumab plus nivolumab Arm C, respectively. The 7-year OS rate was 10.0% (95% CI: 0–22.5) in Arm A, 10.3% (95% CI: 0–22.6) in Arm B, and 42.8% (95% CI: 23.4–62.2) in Arm C. HRQoL was preserved in all treatment arms. Most functional scales evaluated from baseline to W12 were preserved, with a lower mean score decrease for EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and an increase for EORTC QLQ-Brain neoplasm (BN20) in patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab. ConclusionsWith the longest follow-up available to date in melanoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, the NIBIT-M2 study continues to show persistent therapeutic efficacy of I ipilimumab plus nivolumab while preserving HRQoL.

Unveiling the silent threat: Asymptomatic brain metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

Unveiling the silent threat: Asymptomatic brain metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

POLARIS: A phase 2 trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib evaluating high-dose and standard-dose regimens in patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma with brain metastasis

Abstract Background POLARIS (phase 2 [ph2]; NCT03911869) evaluated encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) in combination with binimetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) in BRAF/MEK inhibitor-naïve patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma with asymptomatic brain metastases. Methods The safety lead-in (SLI) assessed tolerability for high-dose encorafenib 300 mg twice daily (BID) plus binimetinib 45 mg BID. If the high dose was tolerable in ph2, patients would be randomized to receive high or standard dose (encorafenib 450 mg once daily [QD] plus binimetinib 45 mg BID). Otherwise, standard dose was evaluated as the recommended ph2 dose (RP2D). Patients who tolerated standard dosing during Cycle 1 could be dose escalated to encorafenib 600 mg QD plus binimetinib 45 mg BID in Cycle 2. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were examined. Results RP2D was standard encorafenib dosing, as >33% of evaluable SLI patients (3/9) had dose-limiting toxicities. Overall, of 13 safety-evaluable patients (10 SLI, 3 ph2), 9 had prior immunotherapy. There were 9 treatment-related adverse events in the SLI and 3 in ph2. Of the SLI efficacy-evaluable patients (n = 10), 1 achieved complete response and 5 achieved partial responses (PR); the brain metastasis response rate (BMRR) was 60% (95% CI: 26.2, 87.8). In ph2, 2 of 3 patients achieved PR (BMRR, 67% [95% CI: 9.4, 99.2]). Repeated encorafenib 300 mg BID dosing did not increase steady-state exposure compared with historical 450 mg QD data. Conclusions Despite small patient numbers due to early trial termination, BMRR appeared similar between the SLI and ph2, and the ph2 safety profile appeared consistent with previous reports of standard-dose encorafenib in combination with binimetinib.

Prevalence of asymptomatic brain metastases in metastatic nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer: Treatment implications for resource-constrained settings

Abstract Background: Brain metastases (BM) are common in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, routine neuroimaging in asymptomatic patients with metastatic NSCLC is controversial as there is no conclusive evidence of benefit from the detection and treatment of asymptomatic BM. Herein, we evaluated the prevalence of asymptomatic BM and its treatment implications in a resource-limited setting. Methods: Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC) were included. Subjects who already had clinical or radiological features suggestive of BM were excluded from the study. All eligible subjects underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Management of the detected BM was at the discretion of the treating clinicians. Results: Among 809 subjects who were screened, 100 (12.4%) were included in the study and underwent MRI. BM was present in 30 (30%) of the subjects and absent in the remaining 70 subjects. A majority of BM were multiple (70%), involved the frontal lobe commonly (73.3%), and had a mean (standard deviation) size of 13.2 (7.3) mm. Detection of BM resulted in a treatment alteration in 17 (17%) of the study subjects (brain irradiation, n = 17, change in targeted therapy, n = 3) with BM. There was no difference in survival of patients who underwent treatment alteration for management of BM compared to those who did not (P = 0.132). Conclusions: About one-third of patients with metastatic NS-NSCLC had BM in MRI despite the absence of symptoms. Despite treatment of the majority of the patients with BM with brain irradiation, there was no demonstrable survival benefit. Hence, we conclude that although routine neuroimaging of asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC may result in treatment alteration (primarily brain irradiation) in a small proportion of patients, it may not influence outcomes in resource-constrained settings.

Abstract C025: Trial in progress: First-in-human study of BBT-207 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation after treatment with EGFR TKI

Abstract Background: There is a high unmet need for an effective therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following osimertinib or other 3rd generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure, especially when resistance is driven by the occurrence of the C797S mutation. BBT-207 is a fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor. Preclinically BBT-207 has shown activity against treatment-emergent complex EGFR mutations containing T790M and/or C797S as well as drug-naïve mutants providing a possibility to overcome resistance to prior TKIs. Activity to intracranial lesions is also anticipated from animal models. Methods: Study BBT207-ONC-001 is an open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, pharmacodynamic characterization, and preliminary antitumor activity of BBT-207 monotherapy in approximately 92 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. It consists of 3 phases: Phase 1a (dose escalation), phase 1b (recommended phase 2 dose selection), and phase 2 (dose expansion). Key eligibility criteria include patients ≥18 years of age with advanced stage and refractory NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, documented partial response, complete response, or durable stable disease after treatment of an EGFR TKI, and previous treatment with all standard therapeutic options and at least one third-generation EGFR TKI. There is no limit on the number of previous treatments received. Phase 1a requires confirmation that the tumor harbors a classical EGFR mutation (19Del or L858R), and phase 1b and phase 2 require confirmation that the tumor or the blood harbors complex EGFR mutations containing C797S. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases who are on stable dose of corticosteroid are eligible. Primary endpoints are to determine recommended dose range (RDR) which is defined between the minimal reproducibly active dose, and the maximum tolerated dose or maximum administered dose and to characterize the overall safety and tolerability of BBT-207 (phase 1a); to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b); to evaluate preliminary antitumor activity with objective response rate (phase 2). Phase 1a dose escalation will be guided by Bayesian logistic regression model. The safety monitoring committee will determine RDR and two recommended dose levels (RDs) within the RDR to be explored in phase 1b. In phase 1b, up to 20 patients will be randomized to each of the two RDs. At the end of phase 1b, a futility test will be performed in the dose level to be treated with the RP2D using Bayesian analysis. Phase 2 will be a non-randomized, open-label phase with up to 20 patients. Patients may receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment continuation beyond progression will be allowed if potential benefits are justified. Investigational new drug application was cleared by the U.S. FDA. Patient enrollment will begin in approximately August 2023 in the U.S. and Republic of Korea. Clinical trial information: NCT05920135. Citation Format: NaEun Jeon, Alexander Spira, Douglas Orr, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Misako Nagasaka, Jin Seok Ahn, Dong-Wan Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Jimin Cho, Agnes Jung, Eunsoo Jung, Chul-Won Kim, Taiguang Jin, Yong-Hee Lee, Sang-Yoon Lee. Trial in progress: First-in-human study of BBT-207 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation after treatment with EGFR TKI [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C025.

P2.03-03 Upfront or Delayed Cranial RT in Oncogene Mutated NSCLC with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

P2.03-03 Upfront or Delayed Cranial RT in Oncogene Mutated NSCLC with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial