Asymptomatic Antibody-mediated Rejection Research Articles

Non-invasive cardiac allograft rejection surveillance: reliability and clinical value for prevention of heart failure.

Allograft rejection-related acute and chronic heart failure (HF) is a major cause of death in heart transplant recipients. Given the deleterious impact of late recognized acute rejection (AR) or non-recognized asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection on short- and long-term allograft function improvement of AR surveillance and optimization of action strategies for confirmed AR can prevent AR-related allograft failure and delay the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, which is the major cause for HF after the first posttransplant year. Routine non-invasive monitoring of cardiac function can improve both detection and functional severity grading of AR. It can also be helpful in guiding the anti-AR therapy and timing of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs). The combined use of EMBs with non-invasive technologies and methods, which allow detection of subclinical alterations in myocardial function (e.g., tissue Doppler imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography), reveal alloimmune activation (e.g., screening of complement-activating donor-specific antibodies and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA) and help in predicting the imminent risk of immune-mediated injury (e.g., gene expression profiling, screening of non-HLA antibodies, and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA), can ensure the best possible surveillance and management of AR. This article gives an overview of the current knowledge about the reliability and clinical value of non-invasive cardiac allograft AR surveillance. Particular attention is focused on the potential usefulness of non-invasive tools and techniques for detection and functional grading of early and late ARs in asymptomatic patients. Overall, the review aimed to provide a theoretical and practical basis for those engaged in this particularly demanding up-to-date topic.

The impact of asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection on outcome after heart transplantation.

Defining criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplantation were standardized a few years ago, but very little is known about asymptomatic cardiac AMR. We will start the review with a background summarizing the timeline of cardiac AMR. Then we will cover past and current knowledge about asymptomatic cardiac AMR and its impact on outcome after transplantation, with added insight from experience with other solid-organ transplants. The incidence of asymptomatic cardiac AMR had likely been under-estimated because biopsy surveillance for it in the absence of clinical manifestation was not the norm. Recent data indicate that it may be more common especially when counting concomitant acute cellular rejection (mixed rejection). Also a higher risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and cardiovascular mortality have been linked to it. The primary implication of these findings is whether therapeutic intervention is warranted, but the appropriate target patient population likely to benefit from treatment is yet to be determined. Asymptomatic cardiac AMR is not uncommon and it negatively impacts outcome after heart transplantation.

Acute Cellular Rejection and C4d Positivity in Heart Transplantation : A Manifestation of Asymptomatic Antibody-Mediated Rejection?

The role of routine C4d staining in endomyocardial biopsy specimens is uncertain. The implications of a diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) with a positive C4d with or without any evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are unclear. This study sought to evaluate a distinct phenotype of ACR+/C4d+ in AMR- patients. Data on C4d, ACR, and AMR were collected. Donor-specific antibody (DSA), panel-reactive antibody (PRA), flow crossmatch, and data on ACR and AMR episodes were also reviewed. Thirty-five patients were followed. Group I with C4d+ biopsy specimens was compared with group II with C4d- biopsy specimens. ACR greater than 1R was higher in group I compared with group II (50% vs 7.4%; P = .01). Clinical suspicion of AMR, positive retrospective crossmatches, and detection of de novo DSA were also higher in group I. Our result indicate that C4d and ACR positivity in posttransplant patients may be a harbinger of a subclinical form of asymptomatic AMR.

Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) in Heart Transplantation: How “Late” Is It?

Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) in Heart Transplantation: How “Late” Is It?

Antibody-mediated rejection of the cardiac allograft

The review will discuss the current pathological criteria for the diagnosis and classification of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in the cardiac allograft. Until recently, the diagnosis of AMR required clinical dysfunction, presence of donor specific antibodies and pathological alterations. The concept of asymptomatic AMR and its adverse long-term outcomes created, in part the need to reevaluate diagnostic criteria. The results of a recent consensus meeting sponsored by International Society For Heart And Lung Transplantation are discussed. The diagnosis of AMR rests on histopathological and immunophenotypic findings. These provide the basis for a new grading scheme.

A longitudinal study of the course of asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation

Growing evidence suggests worse cardiac allograft vasculopathy and mortality in patients with asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Debate continues about whether therapeutic intervention is warranted to avoid adverse outcomes. In this study we examine the course of individual episodes of untreated asymptomatic AMR on follow-up endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The U.T.A.H. Cardiac Transplant Program database was queried for transplant recipients between 1985 and 2009 who survived beyond 1 year and had at least 1 episode of lone AMR with a follow-up EMB. All EMBs were screened for AMR by immunofluorescence and graded for severity. Data were analyzed based on time from transplant (early, ≤12 months; late, >12 months). Nine hundred fifty-eight patients with a total of 15,448 biopsies qualified for the study. Average age at transplant was 46.7 years; 13% of the patients were female. Within the first year post-transplant, asymptomatic AMR was diagnosed in 13.6% of biopsies compared with 5.2% beyond 1 year. AMR resolved in 65% (early) vs 75% (late) on follow-up EMB. More severe AMR was less likely to improve regardless of time from transplant. Furthermore, after an episode of AMR had resolved, the recurrence rate at 3, 6 and 12 months was 44%, 50.1% and 56.2%, respectively. The incidence of AMR is higher in the first year post-transplant and the likelihood of resolution is less on follow-up EMB, especially when more severe. A small but significant number of cases became worse or did not change. These new findings may be helpful in planning future studies that test whether therapeutic interventions on asymptomatic AMR favorably impact outcomes.

41 The Effects of Moderate Strength Pre-Transplant Circulating Antibodies on Outcome after Heart Transplantation

Purpose: Growing evidence suggests worse cardiac allograft vasculopathy and mortality in heart transplant recipients with asymptomatic antibodymediated rejection (AMR). It is being debated whether therapeutic intervention is warranted to avoid adverse outcomes. In this study we examine the course of individual episodes of untreated asymptomatic AMR on next follow-up endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). Methods and Materials: The UTAH Cardiac Transplant Program database was queried for recipients who survived beyond one year posttransplant and experienced at least one episode of lone AMR with a follow-up EMB. All EMBs were screened for AMR by immunofluorescence and graded for severity (V1, no AMR; V2, borderline; V3, mild; V4, moderate; V5, severe AMR). Asymptomatic AMR was uniformly left untreated. Data were analyzed based on time from transplant (early, 12 months; late, 12 months). Results: 999 heart transplant recipients with a total of 15,448 biopsies between 1985-2009 qualified for the study. Average age at time of transplant was 46.7 years, 13% were female. Outcomes are shown in the table below. Furthermore, after an episode of AMR had resolved, the recurrence rate at 3, 6, and 12 months was 44%, 50.1%, and 56.2% respectively.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Heart Transplantation: Case Presentation with a Review of Current International Guidelines

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (humoral rejection) of cardiac allografts remains difficult to diagnose and treat. Interest in AMR of cardiac allografts has increased over the last decade as it has become apparent that untreated humoral rejection threatens graft and patient survival. An international and multidisciplinary consensus group has formulated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AMR and established that identification of circulating or donor-specific antibodies is not required and that asymptomatic AMR, that is, biopsy-proven AMR without cardiac dysfunction is a real entity with worsened prognosis. Strict criteria for the diagnosis of cardiac AMR have not been firmly established, although the diagnosis relies heavily on tissue pathological findings. Therapy remains largely empirical. We review an unfortunate experience with one of our patients and summarize recommended criteria for the diagnosis of AMR and potential treatment schemes with a focus on current limitations and the need for future research and innovation.

Cardiovascular Mortality Among Heart Transplant Recipients With Asymptomatic Antibody-Mediated or Stable Mixed Cellular and Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Little has been reported on the clinical significance of asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) alone or mixed rejection (MR), defined as concurrent cellular rejection (CR) and AMR in heart transplantation. In this study, we examined whether a differential impact on cardiovascular mortality (CVM) existed when comparing asymptomatic AMR, to stable MR or CR. The Utah Transplantation Affiliated Hospitals (UTAH) Cardiac Transplant Program pathology database of all heart transplant recipients between 1985 and 2004 was queried. Patients were classified as cellular, antibody-mediated, or mixed rejectors based on their predominant pattern of rejection type in the first three months post-transplant. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were fit to each of the three groups and analyses were adjusted for age at the time of transplant, gender, and underlying primary cardiac disease. Eight hundred and sixty nine heart transplant recipients qualified for analysis. Over the study period, patients with asymptomatic AMR or stable MR patterns had significantly worse CVM when compared to patients with stable CR pattern (AMR, 21.2%; MR, 18.0%; CR, 12.6%; AMR vs. CR, p = 0.009; MR vs. CR, p = 0.001). In contrast, CVM was comparable in patients with asymptomatic AMR or stable MR patterns (p = 0.9). Asymptomatic or subclinical AMR and MR are clinically relevant, should be recognized, and deserve consideration for therapeutic intervention in hopes of avoiding adverse outcomes.

Asymptomatic Antibody-mediated Rejection After Heart Transplantation Predicts Poor Outcomes

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been associated with poor outcome after heart transplantation. The diagnosis of AMR usually includes endomyocardial biopsy findings of endothelial cell swelling, intravascular macrophages, C4d+ staining, and associated left ventricular dysfunction. The significance of AMR findings in biopsy specimens of asymptomatic heart transplant patients (normal cardiac function and no symptoms of heart failure) is unclear. Between July 1997 and September 2001, AMR was found in the biopsy specimens of 43 patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: asymptomatic AMR (AsAMR, n = 21) and treated AMR (TxAMR with associated left ventricular dysfunction, n = 22). For comparison, a control group of 86 contemporaneous patients, without AMR, was matched for age, gender, and time from transplant. Outcomes included 5-year actuarial survival and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Patients were considered to have AMR if they had > or = 1 endomyocardial biopsy specimen positive for AMR. The 5-year actuarial survival for the AsAMR (86%), TxAMR (68%), and control groups (79%) was not significantly different (p = 0.41). Five-year freedom from CAV (> or = 30% stenosis in any vessel) was AsAMR, 52%; TxAMR, 68%; and control, 79%. Individually, freedom from CAV was significantly lower in the AsAMR group compared with the control group (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between AsAMR vs TxAMR and TxAMR vs control for CAV. Despite comparable 5-year survival with controls after heart transplantation, AsAMR rejection is associated with a greater risk of CAV. Trials to treat AsAMR to alter outcome are warranted.

660: Outcomes with Asymptomatic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become a significant problem in pediatric orthotopic heart transplants (OHT). Unfortunately, the sequelae and outcomes of asymptomatic pediatric OHT patients with AMR are unknown.

Early Screening for Antibody-mediated Rejection in Heart Transplant Recipients

The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) recently established a diagnostic scheme for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Currently, however, confirmatory immunohistochemistry studies are recommended only if AMR is clinically or histologically suspected. In this study, we examine whether a pattern of repetitive AMR occurred early enough after transplantation to warrant prospective immunohistochemistry screening in all recently transplanted recipients. We queried our pathology database of adult and pediatric endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) from 1985 to 2005. All EMB specimens were prospectively studied by immunofluorescence in the early post-operative period. AMR was defined as the presence of complement and immunoglobulin deposits on frozen section. Only patients classified as antibody-mediated rejectors (>or=3 episodes of AMR) were included. Cumulative incidence and time from transplant to first and third AMR episodes were obtained. Three hundred seventy-five of 870 heart transplant recipients had >or=3 episodes of AMR. Mean age of recipients was 45.6 years and 78% were male. A total of 19,569 EMBs comprised the study data. By 100 days post-transplant, 85% of patients had their first and 54% their third AMR. In addition, patients showed a clear trend of early clustering of AMR-positive biopsies. Results were similar regardless of whether or not muromonab-CD3 (Orthoclone OKT3) induction was used. We advocate early immunohistochemical surveillance testing for AMR to supplement the diagnostic algorithm established by the ISHLT, because a pattern of AMR becomes manifest soon after transplantation. This change will allow earlier detection of asymptomatic AMR and may prompt changes in immunosuppression strategies to avoid adverse outcomes.