Asthma Self-management Practices Research Articles

Self-management practice and associated factors among asthmatic patients on follow-up care at public tertiary hospitals, south west, Ethiopia, 2022.

Bronchial asthma is a major public health issue that affects patients, families, and communities worldwide. Despite the growing importance of self-management and its clear link to better health outcomes, the uptake and use of self-management among asthmatic patients is not well understood. Thus, the study aimed to determine the level of self-management practice and associated factors among asthmatic patients on follow-up care at public tertiary hospitals found in south-west Ethiopia. An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was employed from August 1 to September 30, 2022. The study included all asthmatic patients on follow-up care at public tertiary hospitals found in south west Ethiopia, among whom 274 were interviewed. All asthmatic patients who were registered at the chronic follow-up unit of each hospital and fulfilled inclusion criteria were included and interviewed consecutively. The data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire adapted from previous studies, entered into EpiData version 4.6, and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the participant's characteristics. Linear regression was used to identify variables associated with asthma self-management practice, and variables with a p-value of 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Finally, tables, graphs, and text were used to present the data. Out of 274 interviewed asthmatic patients, 45.26% 95% CI (39, 51) had good asthma self-management practices. Advancing in age (ß = -0.009, P = 0.043), being a smoker (ß = -0.346, 95%, P = 0.03, being alcohol drinker (ß = -0.217, P = 0.001), having depression (ß = -0.038, P = 0.005), having anxiety (ß = -0.029, P = 0.02) and having social support (ß = 0.022, P<0.001) were identified as factors affecting asthma self-management practice. The finding revealed that four of every nine asthmatic patients had good asthma self-management practices. Age, alcohol consumption, smoking, anxiety, depression, and social support were significantly associated with asthma self-management practice. Ongoing self-management support and collaborative target interventions aimed at improving asthma self-management practices and identified factors are very crucial.

Asthma patients' perspectives on telehealth in disease management: A focus group study

ObjectivesWhile the effectiveness of telehealth (TH) to improve health outcomes is well established, the utility of ehealth care among adult asthma patients, particularly in patients with limited access to specialty lung clinic services, requires further investigation. This study aimed to explore asthma patients’ perceived applicability of TH in asthma self-management practices, to inform a future TH-based interventional study. MethodsA qualitative exploratory study design was applied during virtual, patient-orientedfocus group sessions and individual telephone interviews. Participants responded to questions spanning 4 main topics: 1) understanding of and beliefs on TH; 2) perceptions about the application of electronic asthma action plans; 3) using tele-communication to interact with a care provider; and 4) prospective TH features for asthma management. Data were collected from 25 patients with asthma (19 attended one of two focus groups and 6 were interviewed individually). Codes and definitions were developed inductively and assembled into a coding framework. Transcripts were subsequently coded, and thematic analysis was performed. ResultsGroup discussions and individual interviews generated 4 TH-related themes: 1) past experiences and future use of TH; 2) perceived advantages and disadvantages of TH in asthma management; 3) integration of TH into self-management practices; and 4) features of a practical TH model for the current healthcare system. ConclusionParticipants input in the design of TH interventions for asthma management could improve access to and quality of virtual care services.

Breathe Well, Live Well: Implementing an Adult Asthma Self-Management Education Program.

Asthma remains a significant health problem in the United States. Adults with poorly controlled asthma can affect their community in a number of ways, from lost productivity in the workplace to health care costs to premature death. Asthma self-management education helps individuals achieve better control of their asthma and is critical for the overall health and well-being of individuals with asthma. While there are numerous programs and initiatives targeting children with asthma, there is a lack of comparable focus on the needs of adults with asthma. The American Lung Association developed Breathe Well, Live Well, an adult asthma self-management education program, and launched it nationwide in 2007. The program for adults has a flexible delivery format for community-based implementation. This article describes the development, dissemination, and transformation of the program. Each stage of implementation showed positive changes in asthma self-management practices that contribute to better asthma control, and one local implementation additionally showed decreased reports of missed work and unscheduled health care visits among participants. The findings from the three evaluations support the use of Breathe Well, Live Well for broad community-based implementation to improve asthma self-management efficacy and behaviors.

Implementation of an intervention to improve the adoption of asthma self-management practices in Peru: Asthma Implementation Research (AIRE) randomized trial study protocol

IntroductionAsthma is the most common chronic disease among children worldwide, with 80% of asthma-related deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While evidence-based guidelines exist for asthma treatment and management, adoption of guideline-based practices is low in high-income country and LMIC settings alike. While asthma prevalence among children and adolescents in Lima, Peru is in the range of 13%–19.6%, our data suggest that < 5% of children in low-resource communities are currently taking guideline-based therapies. There is an urgent need for effective, locally tailored solutions to address the asthma treatment gap in low-income communities in Peru.MethodsThis study aims to develop and test a locally adapted intervention package to improve adoption of self-management practices and utilization of preventive health services for asthma among children in Lima Norte. The intervention package was designed using a systematic, theory-based framework (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation – Behavior Framework) and is rooted in a multi-phased formative research approach. The main study design is an individually randomized implementation-effectiveness hybrid trial enrolling 110 children aged 5–17 years with asthma and their caregivers. Families allocated to the treatment group receive the supported self-management intervention package, while families allocated to the control group receive the standard of care plus asthma education. We will follow participants monthly for six months and evaluate asthma control (Asthma Control Test), healthcare utilization, and medication adherence (Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale). Disease-specific quality of life for children (Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) and caregivers (Pediatric Asthma Caregiver’s Quality of Life Questionnaire) will be evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. We will also evaluate acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity of the intervention using mixed methods approaches.DiscussionThe long-term goal of this study is to disseminate locally appropriate asthma management strategies in LMIC settings. This study will contribute to the body of knowledge surrounding approaches for developing and evaluating intervention strategies for asthma using systematic, theory-based approaches grounded in local context. Such strategies have the potential to inform the development and adaptation of appropriate and scalable solutions for asthma management in LMIC settings.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03986177. Registered on 14 June 2019.

Drawing asthma: An exploration of patients' perceptions and experiences

ABSTRACTObjective: As an art form, drawings can facilitate the tangible expression of patients' inner images and feelings in a range of health conditions. However, there are currently no published studies investigating adults' perspectives of asthma using drawings. This study aimed to explore how adults' drawings illustrate their perceptions and experiences of asthma. Methods: Adults with asthma participated in a one-on-one drawing activity. Analysis was grounded in the participants' accounts of their drawing, which were examined alongside the relevant image. A coding approach was used to cluster thematic material and map the data according to the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM). Results: Eighteen participants took part. Three themes emerged: (1) asthma is constrictive and restrictive, (2) feeling alone, feeling different, and (3) the life journey of asthma. The drawings aligned with several domains of the CSM, in particular consequences. The images drawn by the participants and their subsequent discussions highlighted the prominence of the emotional burden of asthma. Conclusions: The drawings provided powerful and evocative communication of the experience of asthma. Future research using drawings can further both healthcare professionals' and patients' understanding of the physical, social and emotional demands of living with asthma, and support the development of asthma self-management practices.

A snapshot of pharmacist attitudes and behaviors surrounding the management of pediatric asthma

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the current status of pediatric asthma management in the Australian community pharmacy setting from the pharmacists' perspective. This research will allow us to identify training needs of community pharmacists. Method: Pharmacists were recruited from the Sydney metropolitan region and asked to complete a self-reported questionnaire that elucidated information on four general domains relating to pediatric asthma management within community pharmacy. All data collected were analysed descriptively. Bivariate Pearson correlations were performed to determine whether interrelationships existed between specific domains. Results: All 77 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. Thirty-two percent had not completed any asthma related CPD in the past year and only 25% of pharmacists reported using the national asthma guidelines in practice. Just over half of the pharmacists (54%) reported that they provide device technique demonstrations for new inhaled medicines, and 35% of pharmacists reported that they check for written asthma self-management plan possession. Although 65% of pharmacists reported confidence in communication skills, most pharmacists were not confident in setting short-/long-term goals with the patient and carer for managing asthma at home. Pharmacists believed that they are just as effective as doctors in providing asthma counseling and education. Lack of time was identified as a significant barrier. Conclusion: We have identified a gap between guideline recommended practices and the self-reported practices of community pharmacists. Pharmacists need more appropriate continuing education programs that can translate into improved pediatric asthma self-management practices and thus improved asthma outcomes in children. This may require an alternative approach.

Influences of health literacy, judgment skills, and empowerment on asthma self-management practices

Asthma self-management has been recognized as an essential factor for the improvement of asthma outcomes and patients’ quality of life (WHO, 2013). Likewise, empowerment and health literacy have been noted as important elements for the management of chronic diseases. ObjectiveTo study the influence of health literacy and empowerment on asthma self-management. MethodsThis cross-sectional study used a self-reported questionnaire assessing health literacy, judgment skills, empowerment, and asthma self-management; 236 patients were recruited from medical offices in Switzerland and Italy. ResultsJudgment skills (B=2.28, p<0.001) and empowerment (B=0.19, p<0.05) have a significant and positive influence on several asthma self-management practices such as use of medicines, timely medical consultation, and asthma triggers control whereas health literacy (B=−0.15, p<0.175) appeared to have a negative effect on self-management practices. However, this was not significant. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that empowered patients with adequate judgment skills carry out key self-management tasks more appropriately, which in turn will potentially result in better asthma control. Practice implicationsThis study recommends that both empowerment and judgment skills should be addressed in patient education as they serve as essential motivators to engage patients in these behaviors.

Impact of Patients’ Judgment Skills on Asthma Self-Management: A Pilot Study

BackgroundThe majority of current health literacy tools assess functional skills including reading, writing, and numeracy. Although these tools have been able to underline the impact of such skills on individuals’ health behaviour, there is a need for comprehensive measures to examine more advanced skills. The individual’s ability to use health-related information considering his/her own health context, and judging positive and negative consequences of their decisions has been conceptualized as judgment skills. The present study used a newly developed judgment skills tool to explore asthma self-management practices.Design and methodsEighty asthma patients were recruited from medical offices during the year 2013. The questionnaire was self-administered and contained health literacy questions, the judgment skill tool, the Asthma Control Test, and several self-management questions.ResultsSixty-nine percent of participants had adequate health literacy, while 24% and 5% had marginal and inadequate levels, respectively. The high-judgment group referred more to their doctor when experiencing asthma problems t(76)=–2.18, P<0.032; complied more with the use of their control medicine t(77)=–3.24, P<0.002 and went more regularly to the doctor t(78)=–1.80, P<0.038 (one-tailed) than the low-judgment group.ConclusionsThe judgment skills tool can help identify asthma patients’ health information use and reveal how this use may affect some self-management practices.Significance for public healthPatients’ health literacy has a great impact on their health behaviours and their health outcomes. Therefore, it has become more and more common to measure health literacy within the healthcare setting to determine the most effective approach to target patients. The measurement of asthma judgment skills contribute to a deeper understanding of patients’ asthma self-management in crucial topics for asthma control, and have the advantage of assessing the specific abilities needed for this particular condition, which in turn benefits the translation of the findings from the use of this tool into strategies that directly tackle the needs of asthma patients.

Information needs of people with asthma

To describe the information needs of a group of Australians with asthma and the extent to which their needs had been met. A self-administered survey was completed by people with asthma either presenting at community pharmacies or registered with a medical research institute database. The survey questions were developed based on a review of the literature, and included questions regarding participants' information needs about their asthma, their sources of asthma information and the extent to which these information needs had been met. The responses concerning information needs were analysed thematically. Responses concerning sources of asthma information and the extent to which needs were met were analysed using descriptive and correlational statistics. Seventy-one people completed the survey. Key information needs that were identified included medications, management of asthma, asthma triggers, cure, aetiology of asthma and latest research. A third of participants reported having only 'very little', 'a little' or 'some' of their information needs met. The most common source of information was from a doctor (94% respondents), followed by a pharmacist or pharmacy assistant (56%). Insights into the information needs of people with asthma have been provided. In light of the level of unmet information needs of people with asthma, and the types of information sought, pharmacists are in an ideal position to close the information gap and promote optimal asthma self-management practices.

Improving patient adherence with asthma self-management practices: what works?

Effective asthma control is as dependent on patient behavior as it is on guideline-based asthma therapies. More than for many chronic illnesses, asthma management requires patients to be actively engaged in multiple self-management behaviors, including self-monitoring of symptoms, use of an asthma action plan, environmental control practices, and regular adherence with pharmacotherapy using appropriate device technique. When patients are appropriately adherent with these multiple recommendations there is a strong evidence-base that asthma can be very effectively controlled.1 However, multiple studies have found that poor adherence with asthma self-management is very common and a significant contributor to inadequately controlled asthma.2 Studies in adult and pediatric asthma patients suggest that adherence with controller therapies range from 30-70%.3 Less than half of families with asthma complete prescribed environmental control measures to reduce exposure to triggers such as appropriate cleaning measures,4 and dust mite covers, and only one in five families report willingness for pet removal5. Furthermore, up to 55% of patients with asthma still have frequent exposure to nicotine, despite intensive intervention. 6 Poor adherence to asthma self-management guidelines contributes to greater asthma morbidity and mortality.7 Medication nonadherence has been associated with increased symptoms and healthcare utilization8 and more frequent oral steroid bursts.9 Exposure to secondhand smoke has been associated with lower quality of life scores, greater rescue inhaler use, lower lung function, and greater risk for emergency room visits, hospitalization and intensive care unit admission.10 Because of the central role adherence plays in effective asthma control it is critical for clinicians to pay as much attention to patient behavior as to pharmacotherapy. We outline below key factors in promoting optimal patient adherence.

Asthma Incidence among Children and Adults: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey—United States, 2006–2008

Background. Asthma, a chronic respiratory condition affecting 8.2% of the US population (2009), causes significant societal and economic burden, resulting in missed school/work days, activity limitations, and increased healthcare utilization. Annual asthma prevalence estimates are available from national surveys, but these surveys have not routinely collected asthma incidence data that are important for identifying risk factors and trends in rates of disease onset. The Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS), implemented in 2006, provides detailed asthma data that supplement Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data. We analyzed BRFSS and ACBS data to estimate annual asthma incidence and to determine whether these rates differed by age group, sex, and race/ethnicity. Methods. BRFSS and ACBS data from the participating states during 2006–2008 (24 states and District of Columbia [DC] in 2006; 34 states and DC in 2007 and 2008) were analyzed to calculate 12-month incidence rates. Incident cases of asthma were defined as people diagnosed with asthma by a healthcare provider within 12 months prior to survey participation. Results. Estimated asthma incidence among at-risk adults was 3.8/1000, whereas that among at-risk children was 12.5/1000. Incidence among children aged 0–4 years was 23.4/1000, more than five times greater than that among youth aged 12–17 years (4.4/1000). Adult females had 1.8 times greater asthma incidence than adult males (4.9/1000 vs. 2.8/1000, respectively). Incidence among non-Hispanic (NH) White adults was 3.9/1000, among NH non-White adults was 3.2/1000, and among Hispanic adults was 4.0/1000. Conclusions. This is the first successful application of the BRFSS–ACBS during 2006–2008 to estimate asthma incidence rates from participating states and DC. As with known patterns in asthma prevalence, we found that asthma incidence was higher in children than adults, higher in younger children than older children and adolescents, and higher in adult females than adult males. However, we were unable to identify statistically significant differences in asthma incidence among most race/ethnic groups. As additional data on asthma incidence become available from the ACBS, these rates, coupled with ACBS data on symptoms, asthma self-management practices, and healthcare utilization, may help asthma control programs identify risk factors for disease development and target asthma prevention and control measures to populations most affected.

The Influence of Perceived Control of Asthma on Health Outcomes

Psychosocial factors play an important role in outcomes of asthma. Perceived control, a measure of patients' beliefs about their ability to control their disease, has not been studied in association with asthma health outcomes We used data from a prospective cohort study of patients who were hospitalized for asthma (n = 865). After hospital discharge, we conducted structured telephone interviews to obtain demographic characteristics, asthma history, and psychological variables. Interviews included administration of the Perceived Control of Asthma Questionnaire (PCAQ). We then prospectively measured emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for asthma over time, with a median follow-up time of 1.9 years Greater perceived control was associated with better physical health status (mean score increment per 2-point change in PCAQ score, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.47), better asthma-related quality of life (mean score increment, -2.24; 95% CI, -2.6 to -1.83), fewer days of restricted activity due to asthma (mean increment, -1.23; 95% CI, -1.62 to -0.83), and lower asthma severity scores (mean score increment, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.27). In a multivariate model, greater perceived control was associated with a significantly decreased prospective risk of ED visits (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.98; p = 0.008) and hospitalizations for asthma (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90; p < 0.0001). There was no association found between perceived control and most aspects of preventive care or self-management Greater perceived control is associated with improved asthma-related health status as well as with a decreased prospective risk of severe asthma attacks resulting in emergency health-care utilization. This difference does not appear to be mediated by changes in preventive care or asthma self-management practices.

Asthma management practices among children in Georgia.

Asthma self-management, the involvement of patients or their caregivers in the management of their disease, reduces healthcare visits and costs. We assessed selected asthma self-management practices among a representative sample of children in Georgia to guide statewide asthma control programs. A random-digit-dialed telephone survey of 2,121 households with 3,896 children 17 years of age or younger was conducted. Primary caretakers were asked about asthma and medication use of their children. Child data were weighted according to the number of telephone lines in the household and to the 2000 Georgia Census population. Approximately 10 percent of children in Georgia had asthma. Among children with asthma, 30 percent did not have regular asthma checkups and 66 percent did not have a written management plan; 19 percent filled 2 or more prescriptions per year for quick-relief medicine but did not take control medication. For children with asthma for whom tobacco exposure was a known trigger, 35 percent were exposed to tobacco smoke in the home. Opportunities exist to improve self-management, pharmacotherapy, and exposure to triggers for children with asthma. These data can be used to guide organizations and agencies working to reduce the burden of asthma.

Nebulized β2-Agonist Use in High-Risk Inner-City Adults with Asthma

Nebulizer use has been linked to worse asthma outcomes, but the precise reason(s) for this relationship is not known. We assessed the frequency of nebulized β2-agonist use in high-risk inner-city adults with asthma and compared asthma self-management practices according to nebulizer use in this population. This was a cross-sectional study conducted over 6 weeks from 07 to 08 2000. A convenience sample (N = 50) was recruited from an inner-city emergency department (ED). Adults (age ≥18 years) were eligible if they had a physician diagnosis of acute asthma exacerbation. Data regarding asthma symptoms, acute care utilization, use of nebulized β2-agonist for symptom relief, and indicators of asthma self-management (physician for asthma care, use of controller medications, current cigarette smoking, and substance use) were collected by an interviewer-administered survey. Nebulized β2-agonist use was reported by 54.0% of patients during the 30 days before their ED visit. Nebulizer users reported more severe asthma symptoms (96.3% vs. 73.9% with moderate or severe persistent asthma, p = 0.02) than nonusers. Nebulizer users were more likely to have a physician for asthma care (85.2% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.02), have more frequent care from their physicians in the past 12 months (e.g., >3 visits: 59.3% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.02), and notify their physician during their asthma exacerbation (39.1% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.04). Compared with nonusers, nebulizer users reported better care across other indicators of care, though differences between groups were not significant. After accounting for symptom severity, results were largely unchanged. If these findings are confirmed in other studies with larger numbers of patients, we conclude that the relationship between nebulizer use and higher asthma morbidity largely represents preferential use of nebulizers by patients with more symptomatic disease.

Children with Asthma and Nebulizer Use: Parental Asthma Self-Care Practices and Beliefs

We examined demographic characteristics, patterns of medication use, asthma morbidity, and asthma self-management practices and beliefs among inner-city children currently using a nebulizer. We also describe the relationship between asthma self-management practices and beliefs and anti-inflammatory (AI) therapy. We observed a high rate of morbidity, including frequent emergency room visits, hospitalizations, symptom days and nights, and school absences in this group of school-aged children with asthma. More than three-quarters (81%) reported asthma symptoms consistent with mild persistent or greater severity of asthma, and therefore these subjects should be taking AI medications. Another 16% (36 of 231) of these children reported symptoms consistent with mild intermittent asthma. Only 1 out of 7 children in this study reported taking AI medications. We found that parents of children taking daily AI medications were more likely to agree with the belief that children should use asthma medications daily even when the child is not reporting any symptoms.

Asthma in Greenwich, UK: impact of the disease and current management practices.

A great deal of the care of patients with asthma takes place in general practices. The aim of the present study was to describe the impact of asthma in the community and to identify current asthma self-management practices. A two-part questionnaire survey was conducted in a random sample (23%; n=24,398) of persons aged 16-50 yrs, registered with one of the 41 general practices in Greenwich, London, UK. The two parts were: a screening questionnaire identifying persons with current asthma (defined as waking with shortness of breath in the last 12 months, attack of asthma in the last 12 months, or currently taking treatment for asthma); and an asthma questionnaire (completed by those with asthma) assessing quality of life, frequency of asthma symptoms, possession and use of self-management tools, and action in the event of an exacerbation of asthma. The crude response rate was 51%, but this may be an underestimate due to errors in the sampling frame. The prevalences of wheeze and asthma in the past 12 months were 26% and 14%, respectively. Among asthma patients: 43% reported symptoms occurring three or more times per week, and 20% were woken by asthma symptoms on three or more nights per week; most had asthma with a mild impact on quality of life; 26% used inhaled steroids on most days in the preceding month; 16% had a peak flow meter at home; and 7% had oral steroids available. Of the 44% of subjects with asthma, who could identify an exacerbation of asthma in the preceding 6 months: 19% had used a peak flow meter during the episode; 19% had changed their treatment without first being told to do so by a doctor; and 50% had sought urgent medical help. Smokers used less appropriate asthma management and subjects whose asthma had a severe impact on quality of life used more treatment and peak flow monitoring. In conclusion, the prevalence of asthma among adults in Greenwich, UK, has increased since a similar survey in 1986. Many people have fairly mild asthma and a smaller number have severe disease. Much remains to be done to promote appropriate strategies for self-management of asthma exacerbations.