Assessment Of Genotoxic Hazard Research Articles

Metabolism-based category formation for the prioritisation of genotoxicity hazard assessment for plant protection product residues (Part 4): α-Chloroacetamides

In dietary risk assessment of plant protection products, residues of active ingredients and their metabolites need to be evaluated for their genotoxic potential. The European Food Safety Authority recommend a tiered approach focussing assessment and testing on classes of similar chemicals. To characterise similarity, in terms of metabolism, a metabolic similarity profiling scheme has been developed from an analysis of 69 α-chloroacetamide herbicides for which either Ames, chromosomal aberration or micronucleus test results are publicly available. A set of structural space alerts were defined, each linked to a key metabolic transformation present in the α-chloroacetamide metabolic space. The structural space alerts were combined with covalent chemistry profiling to develop categories suitable for chemical prioritisation via read-across. The method is a robust and reproducible approach to such read-across predictions, with the potential to reduce unnecessary testing. The key challenge in the approach was identified as being the need for metabolism data individual groups of plant protection products as the basis for the development of the structural space alerts.

Genotoxicity evaluation of orally administered styrene monomer in mice using comet, micronucleus, and Pig-a endpoints.

Male B6C3F1 mice were administered styrene monomer by oral gavage for 29 consecutive days at dose levels of 0, 75, 150, or 300 mg/kg/day. The highest dose level represented the maximum tolerated dose based on findings in a 28-day dose range-finding study, in which the bioavailability of orally administered styrene was also confirmed. The positive control group received ethyl nitrosourea (ENU; 51.7 mg/kg/day) on Study Days 1-3 and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS; 150 mg/kg/day) on Study Days 27-29 by oral gavage. Approximately 3 h following the final dose, blood was collected to assess erythrocyte Pig-a mutant and micronucleus frequencies. DNA strand breakage was assessed in glandular stomach, duodenum, kidney, liver, and lung tissues using the alkaline comet assay. The %tail DNA for stomach, liver, lung, and kidney in the comet assay among the styrene-treated groups was neither significantly different from the respective vehicle controls nor was there any dose-related increasing trend in any of the tissues; results for duodenum were interpreted to be inconclusive because of technical issues. The Pig-a and micronucleus frequencies among styrene-treated groups also did not show significant increases relative to the vehicle controls and there was also no evidence for a dose-related increasing trend. Thus, orally administered styrene did not induce DNA damage, mutagenesis, or clastogenesis/aneugenesis in these Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development test guideline-compliant genotoxicity studies. Data from these studies can contribute to the overall assessment of genotoxic hazard and risk posed to humans potentially exposed to styrene.

Sub-structure-based category formation for the prioritisation of genotoxicity hazard assessment for pesticide residues (part 2): Triazoles

In dietary risk assessment, residues of pesticidal ingredients or their metabolites need to be evaluated for their genotoxic potential. The European Food Safety Authority recommend a tiered approach focussing assessment and testing on classes of similar chemicals. To characterise similarity and to identify structural alerts associated with genotoxic concern, a set of chemical sub-structures was derived for an example dataset of 66 triazole agrochemicals for which either Ames, chromosomal aberration or micronucleus test results are publicly available. This analysis resulted in a set of ten structural alerts that define the chemical space, in terms of the common parent and metabolic scaffolds, associated with the triazole chemical class. An analysis of the available profiling schemes for DNA and protein reactivity shows the importance of investigating the predictivity of such schemes within a well-defined area of structural space. Structural space alerts, covalent chemistry profiling and physico-chemistry properties were combined to develop chemical categories suitable for chemical prioritisation. The method is a robust and reproducible approach to such read-across predictions, with the potential to reduce unnecessary testing. The key challenge in the approach was identified as being the need for pesticide-class specific metabolism data as the basis for structural space alert development.

Sub-structure-based category formation for the prioritisation of genotoxicity hazard assessment for pesticide residues: Sulphonyl ureas

In dietary risk assessment, residues of pesticidal ingredients or their metabolites need to be evaluated for their genotoxic potential. The European Food Safety Authority recommend a tiered approach focussing assessment and testing on classes of similar chemicals. To characterise similarity and to identify structural alerts associated with genotoxic concern, a set of chemical sub-structures was derived for an example dataset of 74 sulphonyl urea agrochemicals for which either Ames, chromosomal aberration or micronucleus test results are publicly available. This analysis resulted in a set of seven structural alerts that define the chemical space, in terms of the common parent and metabolic scaffolds, associated with the sulphonyl urea chemical class. An analysis of the available profiling schemes for DNA and protein reactivity shows the importance of investigating the predictivity of such schemes within a well-defined area of structural space. Structural space alerts, covalent chemistry profiling and physico-chemistry properties were combined to develop chemical categories suitable for chemical prioritisation. The method is a robust and reproducible approach to such read-across predictions, with the potential to reduce unnecessary testing. The key challenge in the approach was identified as being the need for pesticide-class specific metabolism data as the basis for structural space alert development.

TGx-DDI, a Transcriptomic Biomarker for Genotoxicity Hazard Assessment of Pharmaceuticals and Environmental Chemicals.

Genotoxicity testing is an essential component of the safety assessment paradigm required by regulatory agencies world-wide for analysis of drug candidates, and environmental and industrial chemicals. Current genotoxicity testing batteries feature a high incidence of irrelevant positive findings—particularly for in vitro chromosomal damage (CD) assays. The risk management of compounds with positive in vitro findings is a major challenge and requires complex, time consuming, and costly follow-up strategies including animal testing. Thus, regulators are urgently in need of new testing approaches to meet legislated mandates. Using machine learning, we identified a set of transcripts that responds predictably to DNA-damage in human cells that we refer to as the TGx-DDI biomarker, which was originally referred to as TGx-28.65. We proposed to use this biomarker in conjunction with current genotoxicity testing batteries to differentiate compounds with irrelevant “false” positive findings in the in vitro CD assays from true DNA damaging agents (i.e., for de-risking agents that are clastogenic in vitro but not in vivo). We validated the performance of the TGx-DDI biomarker to identify true DNA damaging agents, assessed intra- and inter- laboratory reproducibility, and cross-platform performance. Recently, to augment the application of this biomarker, we developed a high-throughput cell-based genotoxicity testing system using the NanoString nCounter® technology. Here, we review the status of TGx-DDI development, its integration in the genotoxicity testing paradigm, and progress to date in its qualification at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a drug development tool. If successfully validated and implemented, the TGx-DDI biomarker assay is expected to significantly augment the current strategy for the assessment of genotoxic hazards for drugs and chemicals.

Proliferating primary hepatocytes from the pUR288 lacZ plasmid mouse are valuable tools for genotoxicity assessment in vitro

Safety assessments of substances with regard to genotoxicity are generally based on a combination of in vitro and in vivo tests. These tests are performed according to a (tiered) test strategy whereby a positive result in vitro usually triggers further testing in vivo. A low specificity and high frequency of irrelevant positive results associated with most in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays necessitates the design and validation of suitable alternatives. As such, we examined the feasibility of culturing primary hepatocytes from the pUR288 lacZ reporter mouse, and moreover, using established cultures to reliably assess genotoxic activity in vitro. Initial studies characterizing the metabolic capacity of proliferating lacZ primary hepatocytes indicated that these cells retained at least some activities important for xenobiotic metabolism: cytochrome P450 1A1 enzyme activities were markedly increased in the hepatocytes after exposure to benzo[a]pyrene, and also UDP-glucuronosyl transferase and glutathione-S-transferase activities, both Phase II enzymes, were detected. Increasing levels of phosphorylated p53 at residue serine 389 after ultraviolet treatment indicated a properly functioning p53, one of the criteria for an effective new test system. Four genotoxic substances with different mechanisms of genotoxicity, i.e., benzo[a]pyrene, bleomycin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide, were tested in the lacZ rescue assay. For etoposide and cyclophosphamide, the induction of mutant colonies was rather low. Exposure to benzo[a]pyrene and bleomycin, however, yielded a clear concentration-dependent induction of the lacZ mutant frequency. Based on our preliminary observations, proliferating lacZ primary hepatocytes are a promising new tool for the assessment of genotoxic hazard.

Comparison of metabolite profiles generated in Aroclor‐induced rat liver and human liver subcellular fractions: Considerations for in vitro genotoxicity hazard assessment

Because it is well known that metabolites of chemicals and drugs are frequently the ultimate species responsible for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, in vitro testing to identify the human genotoxicity hazard potential of new chemicals and drugs routinely utilizes liver S-9 fraction from rats treated with Aroclor 1254 as a system that can generate metabolites. However, it is frequently questioned as to whether such an in vitro metabolite generation system is the most relevant for human risk, or whether the assay would be better served by using a human-derived in vitro system. To address this, 16 common drugs have been examined for profiles of metabolites in Aroclor-induced rat liver S-9 and pooled human liver S-9. Metabolite profiles were compared using high pressure liquid chromatography coupled with ion trap mass spectrometry, in line with ultraviolet or radiometric detection to help make semiquantitative comparisons. Results showed that, with few exceptions, metabolites generated in the human system were also generated in the rat system. Also, in several cases the rat system generated considerably more metabolites, suggesting that there is a potential that positive genotoxicity findings could be caused by metabolites that have no relevance to humans. These findings suggest that when conducting in vitro genotoxicity testing using the Aroclor-induced rat liver S-9 system, knowledge of the metabolite profile in the system is important, and a comparison to the profile generated in human liver S-9 could be of value when interpreting the genotoxicity results.

GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC genotoxicity screening assay

Background: Genetic toxicology is getting very interesting. The International Conference on Harmonisation has drafted new guidance that allows for the registration of pharmaceuticals without the submission of data from in vitro mammalian genotoxicity tests (in vitro micronucleus test, chromosomal aberrations, mouse lymphoma assay). These tests often produce falsely positive predictions of genotoxic carcinogenicity. Objectives: This article reviews the properties of the Gadd45a-GFP (green fluorescent protein) assay, for which positive results appear to provide more reliable predictions of genotoxic carcinogenicity. The criteria for assessment of genotoxicity assays are reviewed. Consideration is given to the value of genotoxicity hazard assessment early in pharmaceutical discovery. Methods: Peer-reviewed data have been reviewed, as well as information contributed to the public domain through conference presentations. Results/conclusion: The Gadd45a assay is increasingly used as a screening tool, and has utility in the prioritisation of Ames-negative compounds prior to in vivo genotoxicity assessment.

537 Assessment of genotoxic hazard posed by oral exposure to vanadium pentavalent

537 Assessment of genotoxic hazard posed by oral exposure to vanadium pentavalent

Assessment of Genotoxic Hazard in Petrochemical Workers

Assessment of Genotoxic Hazard in Petrochemical Workers

Genotoxicity hazard assessment of Caramel Colours III and IV

Results from a battery of short-term tests in vitro and in vivo used to assess the genotoxicity of caramel colours are presented and discussed in relation to reports from the literature. No evidence of genotoxicity was found in the Salmonella plate incorporation test using five standard strains or in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene conversion assay using strain D4, either with or without S-9 for activation. A weak clastogenic effect for a sample of Caramel Colour III in CHO cells was abolished in the presence of S-9. Two samples of Caramel Colour IV were not clastogenic in CHO cells. Salmonella pre-incubation tests without S-9 also failed to reveal any mutagenic activity for any of the caramel colours tested. The Caramel Colour III sample that showed clastogenic activity in CHO cells in vitro did not induce micronuclei when evaluated in a mouse bone marrow assay. These results are in general agreement with reports in the literature regarding the genotoxicity of caramel colours, and support the conclusion that caramel colours do not pose a genotoxic hazard to humans.