Assessment Of Colorectal Liver Metastases Research Articles

Detection and Real-Time Surgical Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging during Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Resections.

The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) recommends, with strong evidence, the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging combined with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) to improve identification of superficial liver tumors. This study reports the use of ICG for the detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) during minimally invasive liver resection. A single-center consecutive series of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) hepatic resections for CRLMs was prospectively evaluated (April 2019 and October 2023). A total of 25 patients were enrolled-11 undergoing laparoscopic and 14 undergoing robotic procedures. The median age was 65 (range 50-85) years. Fifty CRLMs were detected: twenty superficial, eight exophytic, seven shallow (<8 mm from the hepatic surface), and fifteen deep (>10 mm from the hepatic surface) lesions. The detection rates of CRLMs through preoperative imaging, laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS), ICG fluorescence, and combined modalities (ICG and LUS) were 88%, 90%, 68%, and 100%, respectively. ICG fluorescence staining allowed us to detect five small additional superficial lesions (not identified with other preoperative/intraoperative techniques). However, two lesions were false positive fluorescence accumulations. All rim fluorescence pattern lesions were CRLMs. ICG fluorescence was used as a real-time guide to assess surgical margins during parenchymal-sparing liver resections. All patients with integrity of the fluorescent rim around the CRLM displayed a radical resection during histopathological analysis. Four patients (8%) with a protruding rim or residual rim patterns had positive resection margins. ICG fluorescence imaging can be integrated with other conventional intraoperative imaging techniques to optimize intraoperative staging. Rim fluorescence proved to be a valid indicator of the resection margins: by removing the entire fluorescent area, a tumor-negative resection (R0) is achieved.

PET/CT in assessment of colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive review with emphasis on 18F-FDG.

Approximately 25% of those who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) as their illness advances. Despite major improvements in both diagnostic and treatment methods, the prognosis for patients with CRLM is still poor, with low survival rates. Accurate employment of imaging methods is critical in identifying the most effective treatment approach for CRLM. Different imaging modalities are used to evaluate CRLM, including positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Among the PET radiotracers, fluoro-18-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG), a glucose analog, is commonly used as the primary radiotracer in assessment of CRLM. As the importance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT continues to grow in assessment of CRLM, developing a comprehensive understanding of this subject becomes imperative for healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines. The primary aim of this article is to offer a simplified and comprehensive explanation of PET/CT in the evaluation of CRLM, with a deliberate effort to minimize the use of technical nuclear medicine terminology. This approach intends to provide various healthcare professionals and researchers with a thorough understanding of the subject matter.

Label-free multiphoton microscopy enables histopathological assessment of colorectal liver metastases and supports automated classification of neoplastic tissue

As the state of resection margins is an important prognostic factor after extirpation of colorectal liver metastases, surgeons aim to obtain negative margins, sometimes elaborated by resections of the positive resection plane after intraoperative frozen sections. However, this is time consuming and results sometimes remain unclear during surgery. Label-free multimodal multiphoton microscopy (MPM) is an optical technique that retrieves morpho-chemical information avoiding all staining and that can potentially be performed in real-time. Here, we investigated colorectal liver metastases and hepatic tissue using a combination of three endogenous nonlinear signals, namely: coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) to visualize lipids, two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) to visualize cellular patterns, and second harmonic generation (SHG) to visualize collagen fibers. We acquired and analyzed over forty thousand MPM images of metastatic and normal liver tissue of 106 patients. The morphological information with biochemical specificity produced by MPM allowed discriminating normal liver from metastatic tissue and discerning the tumor borders on cryosections as well as formalin-fixed bulk tissue. Furthermore, automated tissue type classification with a correct rate close to 95% was possible using a simple approach based on discriminant analysis of texture parameters. Therefore, MPM has the potential to increase the precision of resection margins in hepatic surgery of metastases without prolonging surgical intervention.

The role of tumour biological factors in technical anatomical resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases following induction systemic treatment: An analysis of the Dutch CAIRO5 trial

BackgroundLarge inter-surgeon variability exists in technical anatomical resectability assessment of colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM) following induction systemic therapy. We evaluated the role of tumour biological factors in predicting resectability and (early) recurrence after surgery for initially unresectable CRLM. Methods482 patients with initially unresectable CRLM from the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial were selected, with two-monthly resectability assessments by a liver expert panel. If no consensus existed among panel surgeons (i.e. same vote for (un)resectability of CRLM), conclusion was based on majority. The association of tumour biological (sidedness, synchronous CRLM, carcinoembryonic antigen and RAS/BRAFV600E mutation status) and technical anatomical factors with consensus among panel surgeons, secondary resectability and early recurrence (<6 months) without curative-intent repeat local treatment was analysed by uni- and pre-specified multivariable logistic regression. ResultsAfter systemic treatment, 240 (50%) patients received complete local treatment of CRLM of which 75 (31%) patients experienced early recurrence without repeat local treatment. Higher number of CRLM (odds ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval 1.03–1.15]) and age (odds ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 1.00–1.07]) were independently associated with early recurrence without repeat local treatment. In 138 (52%) patients, no consensus among panel surgeons was present prior to local treatment. Postoperative outcomes in patients with and without consensus were comparable. ConclusionsAlmost a third of patients selected by an expert panel for secondary CRLM surgery following induction systemic treatment experience an early recurrence only amenable to palliative treatment. Number of CRLM and age, but no tumour biological factors are predictive, suggesting that until there are better biomarkers; resectability assessment remains primarily a technical anatomical decision.

Interobserver Variability in CT-based Morphologic Tumor Response Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Purpose To evaluate interobserver variability in the morphologic tumor response assessment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) managed with systemic therapy and to assess the relation of morphologic response with gene mutation status, targeted therapy, and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 measurements. Materials and Methods Participants with initially unresectable CRLM receiving different systemic therapy regimens from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included in this prospective imaging study. Three radiologists independently assessed morphologic tumor response on baseline and first follow-up CT scans according to previously published criteria. Two additional radiologists evaluated disagreement cases. Interobserver agreement was calculated by using Fleiss κ. On the basis of the majority of individual radiologic assessments, the final morphologic tumor response was determined. Finally, the relation of morphologic tumor response and clinical prognostic parameters was assessed. Results In total, 153 participants (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-71]; 101 men) with 306 CT scans comprising 2192 CRLM were included. Morphologic assessment performed by the three radiologists yielded 86 (56%) agreement cases and 67 (44%) disagreement cases (including four major disagreement cases). Overall interobserver agreement between the panel radiologists on morphology groups and morphologic response categories was moderate (κ = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.58 and κ = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.60). Optimal morphologic response was particularly observed in patients treated with bevacizumab (P = .001) and in patients with RAS/BRAF mutation (P = .04). No evidence of a relationship between RECIST 1.1 and morphologic response was found (P = .61). Conclusion Morphologic tumor response assessment following systemic therapy in participants with CRLM demonstrated considerable interobserver variability. Keywords: Tumor Response, Observer Performance, CT, Liver, Metastases, Oncology, Abdomen/Gastrointestinal Clinical trial registration no. NCT02162563 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid\u2013enhanced liver MRI versus multidetector CT in the assessment of colorectal liver metastases compared to hepatic resection

BackgroundImaging is an essential tool in the management of patients with Colorectal cancer (CRC) by helping evaluate number and sites of metastases, determine resectability, assess response to treatment, detect drug toxicities and recurrences. Although multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the first tool used for staging and patient’s surveillance, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most reliable imaging modality that allows to assess liver metastases. Our purpose is to compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-(Gd-EOB) enhanced liver MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT in the detection of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (mCRC).MethodsOne hundred and twenty-eight patients with pathologically proven mCRC (512 liver metastases) underwent Gd-EOB MRI and MDCT imaging. An additional 46 patients without mCRC were included as control subjects. Three radiologists independently graded the presence of liver nodules on a five-point confidence scale. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of metastases were calculated. Weighted к values were used to evaluate inter-reader agreement of the confidence scale regarding the presence of the lesion.ResultsMRI detected 489 liver metastases and MDCT 384. In terms of per-lesion sensitivity in the detection of liver metastasis, all three readers had higher diagnostic sensitivity with Gd-EOB MRI than with MDCT (95.5% vs. 72% reader 1; 90% vs. 72% reader 2; 96% vs. 75% reader 3). Each reader showed a statistical significant difference (p < <.001 at Chi square test). MR imaging showed a higher performance than MDCT in per-patient detection sensitivity (100% vs. 74.2% [p < <.001] reader 1, 98% vs. 73% [p < <.001] reader 2, and 100% vs. 78% [p < <.001] reader 3). In the control group, MRI and MDCT showed similar per-patient specificity (100% vs. 98% [p = 0.31] reader 1, 100% vs. 100% [p = 0.92] reader 2, and 100% vs. 96% [p = 0.047] reader 3). Inter-reader agreement of lesion detection between the three radiologists was moderate to excellent (k range, 0.56–0.86) for Gd-EOB MRI and substantial to excellent for MDCT (k range, 0.75–0.8).ConclusionGadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI performs significantly better in the detection of mCRC, than MDCT, particularly in patients treated with chemotherapy, in subcapsular lesions, and in peribiliary metastases.

3T diffusion-weighted MRI in the response assessment of colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy: Correlation between ADC value and histological tumour regression grading

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to correlate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI) by 3T device with the histological tumour regression grading (TRG) analysis of colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy. Materials and methodsOur study included thirty-five patients with colorectal liver metastases who had undergone MRI by 3T device (GE DISCOVERY MR750; GE Healthcare) after preoperative chemotherapy. DW-MRI was performed using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence with multiple b-values (0, 150, 500, 1000, 1500s/mm2), thus obtaining an ADC map. For each liver lesion (more than 1cm in diameter) the fitted ADC values were calculated by two radiologists in conference and three ROIs were drawn: around the entire tumour (ADCe), at the tumour periphery (ADCp) and at the tumour center (ADCc). All ADC values were correlated with histopathological findings after surgery. Hepatic metastases were pathologically classified into five groups on the basis of TRG. Statistical analysis was performed on a per-lesion basis utilizing the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. ResultsA total of 106 colorectal liver metastases were included for image analysis. TRG1, TRG2, TRG3, TRG4 and TRG5 were observed in 4, 14, 36, 35 and 17 lesions, respectively. ADCe and ADCp values were significantly higher in lesions classified as TRG1 (2.40±0.12×10−9m2/s and 2.28±0.26×10−9m2/s, respectively) and as TRG2 (1.40±0.31×10−9m2/s and 1.44±0.35×10−9m2/s), compared to TRG3 (1.16±0.13×10−9m2/s and 1.01±0.18×10−9m2/s), TRG4 (1.10±0.26×10−9m2/s and 0.97±0.24×10−9m2/s), and TRG5 (0.93±0.17×10−9m2/s and 0.82±0.28×10−9m2/s). ADCe, ADCp and ADCc values were significantly different in TRG classes (p<0.0001). Statistical correlations were found between the ADCe, ADCp, ADCc values and the TRG classes (Spearman correlation coefficient were −0.568, −0.542 and −0.554, respectively). ConclusionOur study showed a significant correlation between ADC values of 3T DW-MRI and histological TRG of colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy.

Prospective diagnostic test accuracy comparison of computed tomography during arterial portography and Primovist magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative assessment of colorectal cancer liver metastases

ObjectivesTo assess and compare the accuracy and inter-observer agreement for the detection of liver lesions using Primovist magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) and computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP). MethodsPatients evaluated at St George Hospital Liver Unit for colorectal liver metastases (CRCLM) underwent CTAP as part of standard staging. pMRI was added to the pre-operative assessment. Two radiologists reported CTAP and two reported pMRI. The sensitivity and specificity of CTAP and pMRI were calculated using histopathology as the gold standard. ResultsComplete data were available for 62 patients corresponding to 219 lesions confirmed on histopathology. Agreement on the detection of lesions between the two radiologists that reported pMRI was higher than for CTAP (Kappa = 0.80 versus 0.74). Specificity of lesion detection for pMRI was 0.88 and 0.83 for CTAP (P = 0.112). Sensitivity for pMRI was 0.83 and 0.81 for CTAP. For patients who had chemotherapy before evaluation, pMRI had a significantly higher specificity than CTAP (0.79 versus 0.63, P = 0.011). ConclusionspMRI is less invasive, has a good inter-observer agreement, has comparable sensitivity and specificity to CTAP in the pre-chemotherapy population and demonstrates better specificity in patients assessed post-chemotherapy. pMRI is a valid alternative to CTAP in the assessment of CRCLM.

Respiratory gated and prolonged acquisition 18F-FDG PET improve preoperative assessment of colorectal liver metastases

Detection of small liver metastases from colorectal cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT is hampered by high physiologic uptake in the liver parenchyma and respiratory movements during image acquisition. To investigate whether two tailored 18F-FDG PET liver acquisitions (prolonged liver acquisition time [PL-PET] and repeated breath-hold respiratory gated liver acquisition [RGL-PET]) would improve detection of colorectal liver metastases, when added to a standard whole body PET (WB-PET). Twenty consecutive patients referred to our hospital for surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases diagnosed with contrast-enhanced CT underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tailored for detection of liver metastases. Concordance between preoperative imaging results and true findings (histology and/or follow-up imaging) as well as changes in clinical management, based on 18F-FDG PET/CT findings, were documented. Background noise, defined as the standard deviation measured in a reference region within the normal liver parenchyma, was compared between the three 18F-FDG PET/CT protocols. WB-PET, PL-PET, and RGL-PET showed suspicious liver lesions in 18 out of 20 patients. Compared to WB-PET alone, the combination of PL-PET and RGL-PET showed additional lesions in the liver in seven out of the 18 patients. The combination of all three PET acquisitions changed clinical management in four patients. Two patients with negative PET results were later found to have benign liver lesions. The addition of tailored liver-specific 18F-FDG PET/CT protocols (PL-PET and RGL-PET) to a WB-PET, improved the detection of intrahepatic colorectal metastases, compared to WB-PET alone. Such add-ons can change clinical patient management of potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases.

Assessment of colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT: Impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility with histopathological correlation

IntroductionTo compare the diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility of CT and MRI in detecting colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) of observers with different levels of experience. Materials and methodsData from 51 CT and 54 MRI examinations of 105 patients with CRLM were analysed. Intraoperative and histopathological findings served as the reference standard. Analyses were performed by four observers with varying levels of experience regarding imaging of CRLM (reviewers A, B, C and D with respectively >20, >5, <1 and 0 years of experience). Per-segment sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's kappa (κ) for diagnosed segments and Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC) for reported number of lesions were calculated. ResultsCT sensitivity and specificity was for reviewer A 89.71%/94.41%, B 78.50%/88.37%, C 63.55%/85.58%, D 84.11%/78.60% and regarding MRI A 90.40%/95.43%, B 74.40%/90.04%, C 60.00%/85.89% and D 65.60%/75.90%. The overall inter-observer agreement was higher for CT (κ=0.43, p<0.001; ICC=0.75, p<0.001) than MRI (κ=0.38, p<0.001; ICC=0.65, p<0.001). The experienced reviewers A and B achieved better agreement for MRI (κ=0.54, p<0.001; ICC=0.77, p<0.001) than CT (κ=0.52, p<0.00; ICC=0.76, p<0.001) unlike the less experienced C and D (MRI κ=0.38, ICC=0.63 and CT κ=0.41, ICC=0.74, respectively, p<0.001). ConclusionsThe proficiency in detection of CRLM is significantly influenced by observer experience, although CT interpretation is less affected than MRI analysis.

PET/triphasic contrast enhanced CT: Optimized protocol for the assessment of colorectal liver metastases

PET/triphasic contrast enhanced CT: Optimized protocol for the assessment of colorectal liver metastases

PET/triphasic contrast enhanced CT: Optimized protocol for the assessment of colorectal liver metastases

PET/triphasic contrast enhanced CT: Optimized protocol for the assessment of colorectal liver metastases

Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 64-row MDCT and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI at 3.0 T in patients with colorectal liver metastases in correlation with histopathological findings. Lesions detected at MDCT and MRI were interpreted by three blinded readers and compared with histopathological workup as the term of reference. Two subgroups of lesions were additionally evaluated: (1) metastases smaller than 10mm and (2) lesions in patients with and without steatosis of the liver, assessed histopathologically. Surgery and histopathological workup revealed 81 colorectal liver metastases in 35 patients and diffuse metastatic involvement in 3 patients. In a lesion-by-lesion analysis, significant sensitivity differences could only be found for reader 1 (P = 0.035) and reader 3 (P = 0.003). For segment-based evaluation, MRI was more sensitive only for reader 3 (P = 0.012). The number of false-positive results ranged from 3 to 12 for MDCT and 8 to 11 for MRI evaluation. In the group of small lesions, the sensitivity differed significantly between both methods (P = 0.003). In patients with hepatic steatosis, MRI showed a trend toward better performance than MDCT, but without statistical performance. The 3.0-T MRI with liver-specific contrast agents is the preferred investigation in the preoperative setting, especially for the assessment of small colorectal liver metastases. • Potential surgical treatment requires accurate radiological assessment of colorectal liver metastases • Magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetic acid is the preferred imaging investigation. • MRI is better than multidetector CT for detecting small liver metastases.

Response assessment of colorectal liver metastases with contrast enhanced CT/18F-FDG PET

PurposeEvaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced CT/PET (ceCT/PET) in the response assessment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Methods33 ce CT/PET studies of 19 patients with colorectal liver metastases were prospectively evaluated. All of them, 13 (68.4%) were males and 6 (31.6%) females. Mean age and range were 63 [42–78]. All patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In all cases post-therapy diagnostic confirmation of liver lesions was obtained. A ce CT PET/was obtained 1h after the injection of 370MBq of 18F-FDG.Metabolic and morphologic studies were evaluated by two blinded nuclear physicians and radiologists respectively to assess the location, size and suspected diagnosis of lesions (benign or malignant). A combined assessment of both techniques was performed.The final diagnosis was established by histopathology or clinical/radiological follow-up greater than 6 months. ResultsA total of 120 liver lesions were identified, 115 were malignant and 5 benign.From the malignant lesions, 105 were identified with the ceCT, 44 with the PET and 109 with ceCT/PET. All of the benign lesions were correctly classified with any of the three imaging techniques.The sensitivity of PET, ceCT and ceCT/PET were of 38%, 91% and 95% respectively and the specificity was 100% in all three of the diagnostic studies. ConclusionAdministration of intravenous contrast in the PET/CT is mandatory to evaluate treatment response rate of liver metastases due to the limitations of isolated metabolic images in these cases.

Prognostic Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Modern multidisciplinary therapy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is associated with significant morbidity and must be adapted to the patient's relative risk. The tools currently available to risk-stratify patients are limited. This study assessed the prognostic utility of metabolic measurements derived from(18)F-FDG PET compared with previously proposed prognostic scoring systems. Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies from a series of 30 patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated. Quantitative (18)F-FDG PET analysis calculated the maximum and mean standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and tumor glycolytic volume (TGV) as measures of the metabolic activity of tumors. The predictive value of these parameters was compared with that of 4 prognostic scores developed by Fong, Iwatsuki, Nordlinger, and Rees. High MTV and TGV in patients before metastasectomy were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (MTV: P = 0.001; TGV: P = 0.004) and recurrence-free survival (MTV: P = 0.001, TGV; P = 0.002). Maximum and mean standardized uptake value did not show any significant predictive ability. Of the prognostic scores, prediction of outcome was most accurate using the Basingstoke index (area under the curve, 0.898). Assessment of metabolic tumor burden with volumetric (18)F-FDG PET parameters appears to be a valuable adjunct in determining the biology of CRLM before surgical resection and may enable better risk stratification of patients.

Accuracy of Multislice Liver CT and MRI for Preoperative Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Introduction: To determine the best imaging modality for preoperative detection, characterization and measurement of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: A total of 79 lesions in 15 patients with CRLM were included. Following NAC, all patients received multislice liver CT (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that were scored by two observers for lesion number, type, diameter (mm) and segmental location. Intraoperative findings, histopathology and follow-up imaging were used as reference standard for surgically treated patients; non-surgical candidates underwent follow-up imaging. Results: Lesion detection rate was similar for MSCT and MRI (76 and 80%, respectively, p = 0.648). Lesion characterization was significantly superior (p = 0.021) at MRI (89%, ĸ 0.747, p = 0.001) compared to MSCT (77%, ĸ 0.235, p = 0.005). Interobserver variability for diameter measurement was not significant at MRI (p = 0.909 [95% CI –1.245 to 1.395]), but significant at MSCT (p = 0.028 [95% CI –3.349 to –2.007]). Differences in diameter measurement were independent of observer (p = 0.131), and no statistical effect from imaging modality on diameter measurement was observed (p = 0.095). Conclusion: MRI is superior to MSCT in preoperative characterization and measurement of CRLM after NAC. Lesion detection rates for both modalities are comparable.

FDG PET in Preoperative Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases Combining “Evidence-Based Practice” and “Technology Assessment” Methods to Develop Departmental Imaging Protocols: Should FDG PET Be Routinely Used in the Preoperative Assessment of Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases?

In today's environment of progressively evolving and expensive imaging modalities, radiologists are asked to justify the use of resources to patients, referring physicians, hospital management, and third party payers. With this aim, the radiologist may use "top-down" or "bottom-up" "evidence-based practice" (EBP) techniques. "Top-down" suggests that the practitioner should wait until a higher authority, external to their practice, generates a solution to practice dilemmas (e.g., National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [NICE] guidelines). "Bottom-up" however, is based on the theory that the ordinary practitioner is best served by a decentralized approach to problem solving that is internal to their practice. The technology assessment framework modeled by Mackenzie and Dixon comprehensively assesses the effects of imaging using levels of efficacy including diagnostic performance, diagnostic impact, and therapeutic impact, impact on health and cost effectiveness. In this article, we describe how issues regarding new imaging modalities in ordinary radiology practice can be addressed by using stepwise "bottom-up" EBP techniques combined with the technology assessment framework. We also detail how EBP techniques form an integral part of practice-based learning among radiology residents as part of noninterpretive residency training. The following clinical scenario is used: your hospital's chief hepatobiliary surgeon writes to your department regarding the lack of access to 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases under consideration for hepatic resection. How would you approach this problem? Here is how we would do it.

Intraoperative Ultrasonography in Detecting and Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

to assess the clinical value of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in detecting and assessment of liver metastatic tumours in colorectal cancer patients. a study is a retrospective analysis of 388 patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma between 1997 and 2004. In all the patients intraoperative ultrasound was performed. The authors analyzed of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of pre- and intraoperative ultrasonography in detecting and staging of colorectal metastatic lesions. Intraoperative ultrasonography showed the highest sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in both, tumor detection (99.1, 98.5 and 98.9%, respectively) and assessment (95.4, 99.5 and 99.1%, respectively). Overall sensitivity of IOUS was significantly better in detection and staging compared with preoperative ultrasonography 91.1 and 72.2%, respectively). IOUS should be used as routine diagnostic modality in colorectal cancer patients with hepatic metastases or suspected metastases. Transabdominal ultrasonography cannot be used as the only diagnostic tool in the evaluation of liver lesions, but may be helpful in preoperative screening.

15 ORAL Does 18F-FDG PET/CT alter the management of patients with colorectal liver metastases?

Aims: To determine if 18F-FDG PET/CT provides additional information to routine multidetector spiral CT (MDCT), in assessment of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients referred for assessment of CLM with 18F-FDG PET/CT was carried out. Only patients who underwent routine imaging with contrast enhanced MDCT within 2 weeks of the PET scan were included in the analysis. Imaging results were compared in terms of discordances in detection of hepatic / extraheptic disease and their subsequent influence on final management. Results: In total 32 patients (20 males, 12 females, with the median age of 63 years (range 28-82)) were included in the analysis. Indications for 18F-FDG PET/CT were for the assessment of indeterminate lesions found on MDCT in 7 patients (22%) and for further staging in the remaining 25 (78%). Overall, there were discordant findings between PET/CT and MDCT in 17 patients (53%). Of these, PET/CT provided additional information in 14 (43%), which consisted of excluding hepatic disease in 3 (9%), detecting additional liver metastases in 3 (9%) and detecting occult extraheptic disease in further 8 (25%) patients. The remaining discordances were due to 2 (6%) false negative liver lesions and one (3%) false positive mediastinal lesions found on PET/CT. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT provided additional information in 43% (14/32) of patients, this translated to a change in management of 34% (11/32). Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET/CT can provide additional information to MDCT, which can result in a change in management of up to 34% of patients with CLM.

Liver metastases of colorectal cancer: US, CT or MR?

In contrast to other extrahepatic malignancies many colorectal cancers can be cured even when there is metastatic spread to the liver. The diagnosis of liver metastases relies totally on imaging to decide which patients may be surgical candidates. The diagnostic value of ultrasound with contrast agents, multidetector CT and MR imaging with non-specific gadolinium chelates and liver-specific contrast agent is discussed. Nowadays MDCT is the mainstay of staging and follow-up of these patients, because it provides good coverage of the liver and the complete abdomen and the chest in one session. MR imaging has been shown to be superior to helical CT in the preoperative assessment of colorectal liver metastases. Large studies are needed to define the role of MDCT vs. MRI staging in patients referred for resection of liver metastases.