Assessment Of Central Venous Pressure Research Articles

The LUSBI Protocol (Lung Ultrasound/BREST Score/Inferior Vena Cava)-Its Role in a Differential Diagnostic Approach to Dyspnea of Cardiogenic and Non-Cardiogenic Origin.

Background and Objectives: PoCUS ultrasound applications are widely used in everyday work, especially in the field of emergency medicine. The main goal of this research was to create a diagnostic and therapeutic protocol that will integrate ultrasound examination of the lungs, ultrasound measurements of the inferior vena cava (assessment of central venous pressure) and BREST scores (risk stratification for heart failure), with the aim of establishing a more effective differential diagnostic approach for dyspneic patients. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the emergency medicine department with the educational center of the community health center of Banja Luka. Eighty patients of both sexes were included and divided into experimental and control groups based on the presence or absence of dyspnea as a dominant subjective complaint. Based on the abovementioned variables, the LUSBI protocol (lung ultrasound/BREST score/inferior vena cava) was created, including profiles to determine the nature of the origin of complaints. The biochemical marker of heart failure NT pro-BNP served as a laboratory confirmation of the cardiac origin of the complaints. Results: The distribution of NT pro BNP values in the experimental group showed statistically significant differences between individual profiles of the LUSBI protocol (p < 0.001). Patients assigned to group B PLAPS 2 had significantly higher average values of NT pro-BNP (20159.00 ± 3114.02 pg/mL) compared to other LUSBI profiles. Patients from the experimental group who had a high risk of heart failure according to their BREST scores also had a significantly higher average maximum expiratory diameter compared to those without heart failure (p = 0.004). A statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) in LUSBI profiles was observed between the groups of patients divided according to CVP categories. Conclusion: The integration of the LUSBI protocol into the differential diagnosis of dyspnea has been shown to be very effective in confirming or excluding a cardiac cause of the disease in patients.

Extraction of the Jugular Venous Pulse and carotid profile using a cervical contact plethysmography system

The Jugular Venous Pulse (JVP) is considered a reliable parameter for the assessment of Central Venous Pressure (CVP). Here, the functionality of a cervical contact plethysmography system designed for non-invasive and operator-independent acquisition of the JVP signal, is shown. To validate the signal, it was recorded in supine and sitting positions, together with the reference Electrocardiography (ECG), on 26 healthy subjects. In the supine acquired signal, the characteristic JVP waves (a, c, v) and the negative deflections (x, y) are well recognizable. In the sitting recorded signal, the systolic peak b and the d incisura of the Common Carotid Artery (CCA) waveform are recognized. For each signal, we calculated the Fraction of the Cardiac Cycle (ccf) represented by the time intervals between the JVP peaks and the ECG peaks, in the form: ΔtaP, ΔtcR, ΔtxP, ΔtvT, Δtyv, Δtvx, and Δtxa. The same was done for the CCA waveform, in the form: ΔtbS, ΔtbT, Δtdb, ΔtdS, and ΔtdT. This system could mitigate risks and costs associated with central venous catheterization and its potential extends to applications in telemedicine, sports medicine, and space medicine.

Association between early central venous pressure measurement and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with heart failure: A cohort of 11,241 patients

BackgroundThe timing of central venous pressure (CVP) measurement may play a crucial role in heart failure management, yet no studies have explored this aspect. MethodsClinical information pertaining to patients in critical condition with a diagnosis of heart failure was retrieved from the MIMIC-IV database. The association between initial measurements of central venous pressure (CVP) and the incidence of mortality from all causes was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards approach. Subgroup analysis and propensity score matching were conducted for sensitivity analyses. ResultsThis study included 11,241 participants (median age, 75 years; 44.70 % female). Utilizing restricted cubic spline and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, it was determined that prognostic outcomes were better when CVP was measured within the initial 5-h window. Multivariate-adjusted 1-year (HR: 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.61–0.77), 90-day (HR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.62–0.80), and 30-day (HR: 0.67; 95 % CI: 0.57–0.78) all-cause mortalities were significantly lower in patients with early CVP measurement, which was proved robustly in subgroup analysis. Subsequent to the application of propensity score matching, a cohort of 1536 matched pairs was established, with the observed mortality rates continuing to be significantly lower among participants who underwent early CVP assessment. ConclusionsEarly CVP measurement (within 5 h) demonstrated an independent correlation with a decrease in both immediate and extended all-cause mortality rates among patients in critical condition suffering from heart failure.

INFERIOR VENA CAVA COLLAPSIBILITY INDEX AS A NON-INVASIVE METHOD OF ASSESSING THE VOLEMIC STATUS OF PATIENTS DURING SPINE INTERVENTIONS

Objective. To prove the possibility of using non-invasive diagnostics of the volemic state of postoperative patients using ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava collapsibility index. Methods. The study included 67 patients who underwent transpedicular fixation of the spine with laminectomy. Volemiс status was determined for all participants in two ways: by catheterization of the central vein and determination of central venous pressure, as well as by ultrasound examination of the inferior vena cava and calculation of inferior vena cava collapsibility index. Results. According to the results of the invasive assessment of central venous pressure, patients were divided into 3 groups: group I (patients in hypovolemic state, n = 31), group II (patients in euvolemic state, n = 25) and group III (patients in hypervolemic state, n = 11 ). The average values of central venous pressure indicators in patients of these groups were statistically significantly different from each other (p &lt; 0.01). The difference between the mean values of the inferior vena cava collapse index in the respective groups was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.01). A reliable inverse correlation of very high strength was found between the indicators of inferior vena cava collapsibility index and central venous pressure (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions. Determination of the patient's volemic state is an extremely important tool for the correct selection of the fluid volume management. Ultrasound assessment of volemic status has a number of advantages, such as the non-invasiveness of the method, wide availability, low price and speed of execution. According to the results of our study, the possibility of using inferior vena cava collapsibility index to assess the volemic status of patients has been demonstrated.

Role of Vena Cava Inferior Ultrasound in Volume Assesment

Regulation of body fluid volume is a key concern for physicians in intensive care units. In intensive care, it is most important to determine the intracellular fluid status because it directly affects the volume status of the patient. Ultrasonography appears to be a useful tool for the assessment of body fluid status. The gold standard for measuring central venous pressure (CVP) is a central venous catheter. Vena cava inferior ultrasound (US-VCI) has been proposed as the non-invasive technique of choice for CVP assessment due to its wide availability, low costs, and ease of use. While a depleted IVC is often observed in hypovolemic patients, typically the IVC is dilated in a hypervolemic condition with a less pronounced or null respiratory collapse in the appropriate clinical context. respiratory variability in VCI diameteris known as the caval index (collapsibility index=VCImaxVCImin /VCImax) and is considered to reflect the intravascular volume state. According to the current updated American and European guidelines, an IVC diameter ≤2.1 cm and collapsibility &gt;50% during inspiration suggest a RAP between 0–5 mm Hg while a diameter &gt;2.1 cm with &lt;50% inspiratory collapse indicates a high RAP of 10–20 mmHg. Primarily because of complicated pathophysiological mechanisms, ultrasound measurement of VCI should not be used as the only parameter in the assessment of volemic status.

Diagnostic value of an increase in central venous pressure during SBT for prediction of weaning failure in mechanically ventilated patients: A cross-sectional study.

Timely and successful extubation is an essential step forward in clinical practice to minimize complications of mechanical ventilation and unsuccessful weaning processes. Thus, research into predictive factors of weaning outcome to optimize spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) precision before extubation is critical in intensive care practices. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictive factors of the weaning outcome before and during SBT in mechanically ventilated patients. In this cross-sectional study, 159 mechanically ventilated patients who were eligible for SBT were enrolled. Of these patients, 140 had successful extubation, whereas the remainder failed. Each patient's PaCO2 and PaO2 levels, respiratory rate (RR), SpO2, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and central venous pressure (CVP) values at the start of SBT, 3 min later, and at the end of SBT were measured. These values, along with the patients'clinical characteristics, were then investigated to determine if there was any correlation between these variables and the weaning outcome. Our analysis revealed that increase in CVP, independent of hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, PaO2, SpO2, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and SBT process, as well as underlying disease, was positively correlated with extubation/weaning failure. While age, gender, vital signs (MAP, RR, and HR), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) scores had no significant correlation with patients'extubation outcomes. According to our findings, integrating CVP assessment into SBT besides routine indices measurement and monitoring can be considered for the prediction of weaning outcome in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.

Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasonography for Volume Status Evaluation: An Intriguing Promise Never Fulfilled

The correct determination of volume status is a fundamental component of clinical evaluation as both hypovolaemia (with hypoperfusion) and hypervolaemia (with fluid overload) increase morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. As inferior vena cava (IVC) accounts for two-thirds of systemic venous return, it has been proposed as a marker of volaemic status by indirect assessment of central venous pressure or fluid responsiveness. Although ultrasonographic evaluation of IVC is relatively easy to perform, correct interpretation of the results may not be that simple and multiple pitfalls hamper its wider application in the clinical setting. In the present review, the basic elements of the pathophysiology of IVC behaviour, potential applications and limitations of its evaluation are discussed.

CORRELATION BETWEEN CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE AND INFERIOR VENA CAVA DISTENSIBILITY INDEX FOR ASSESSMENT OF VOLUME STATUS IN CRITICALLY ILL CHILDREN

Background: Fluid management is a critical component for the management of critically ill children. This condition requires an examination to assess intravascular volume. Assessment of central venous pressure (CVP) is often used in critically ill children. Still, it is an invasive procedure that is prone to various complications, while measurement of the inferior vena cava distensibility index (IVC-DI) with ultrasound is a non-invasive procedure that can also be used to assess volume status in critically ill children. Objective: To determine the correlation between central venous pressure and inferior vena cava distensibility index to assess volume status in critically ill children. Methods: Analytic cross-sectional study was carried out in PICU RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan from December 2021 until January 2022. Samples were patients aged from 1 month to 18 years hospitalized in PICU with a central vein catheter installed and mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were defined as patients with heart failure, hemothorax, pneumothorax, and hemopneumothorax. This study was conducted by examining central venous pressure (CVP). Then, the USG doppler was used simultaneously to assess the inferior vena cava distensibility index (IVC-DI). The correlation between central venous pressure and inferior vena cava distensibility index was assessed using the Spearman Correlation test or Kruskal Wallis test. Results: CVP and IVC-DI values had a strong correlation in negative correlation and the result was statistically significant (r=-0,623, p= 0,003). Meanwhile, a significant correlation positive was found between CVP and volume status (r= 0,940, p= <0,001) but it had negative correlation with IVC-DI (r= -0,573, p=0,008). Conclusion: There was a negative correlation between central venous pressure and inferior vena cava distensibility index for assessing volume status in critically ill children.

A novel sphygmomanometer for central venous pressure assessment during stress echocardiography

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf StressEcho 2030 study group Background. Central venous pressure (CVP) is important in the hemodynamic phenotyping of failing heart, and the usual invasive assessment can be surrogated by a sphygmomanometer for venous pressure (SVEN) which has been recently prototyped and validated. Aim To assess the technical success rate and correlates of CVP measurements by SVEN during stress echocardiography (SE) Methods We evaluated 22 consecutive patients (age 66 ±11 years, 15 men, ejection fraction 60 ±6%) referred for clinically-driven dipyridamole (n = 20, for chest pain) or treadmill (n = 2, for dyspnea) SE with ABCDE protocol (score range from 0= all steps normal, to 5= all steps abnormal). Step A assesses regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA); step B, B-lines (diastolic function); step C, left ventricular contractile reserve based on force; step D, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in left anterior descending artery; step E, heart rate reserve (HRR). In each patient, the usual setting of echocardiographic, electrocardiographic and arterial blood pressure monitoring was integrated with CVP measurement by SVEN (right arm, contralateral to the arterial sphygmomanometer arm) with personalized cuff sizes. SVEN measurements of CVP were obtained at rest and peak stress. Results. SVEN preparation and automated analysis required &amp;lt; 5 minutes for positioning, inflation-deflation, acquisition and off-line reading for single measurement. SVEN success rate was 22/22 (100%). CVP did not change during SE (rest = 2.4 ± 0.5 vs stress= 3.7 ± 0.8 mmHg, p = 0.106). Resting CVP was correlated inversely to ejection fraction at rest (r=-0.489, p = 0.021) and at peak stress (r=-0.545, p = 0.001), CFVR (r=-0.505, p = 0.023), HRR (r=-0.503, p = 0.017) and directly to RWMA (r = 0.431, p = 0.045), B-lines at peak stress (r= 0.626, p = 0.002) and left atrial volume index at rest (r= 0.552, p =0.012) and at peak stress (r = 0.648, p = 0.002). CVP was significantly higher in patients with B-Lines at peak stress (Figure). ABCDE score was directly related to CVP (r = 0.560, p = 0.007). Conclusion. SVEN assessment is feasible at rest and during stress with extremely high success rate and only minimal increase in preparation and analysis time. Changes observed are consistent with the expected hemodynamic profile, with CVP increase associated with more B-lines (a sign of pulmonary congestion and elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) and larger left atrium (an integrated barometer of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure). Abstract Figure.

A Novel Non-Invasive Device for the Assessment of Central Venous Pressure in Hospital, Office and Home.

BackgroundVenous congestion can be quantified by central venous pressure (CVP) and its monitoring is crucial to understand and follow the hemodynamic status of patients with cardio-respiratory diseases. The standard technique for CVP measurement is invasive, requiring the insertion of a catheter into a jugular vein, with potential complications. On the other hand, the current non-invasive methods, mainly based on ultrasounds, remain operator-dependent and are unsuitable for use in the home environment. In this paper, we will introduce a novel, non-invasive device for the hospital, office and home assessment of CVP.MethodsAfter describing the measurement concept, we will report a preliminary experimental study enrolling 5 voluntary healthy subjects to evaluate the VenCoM measurements’ repeatability, and the system’s capability in measuring small elicited venous pressure variations (2 mmHg), as well as an induced venous hypertension within a pathological range (12÷20 mmHg).ResultsThe experimental measurements showed a repeatability of ±1mmHg. The VenCoM device was able to reliably detect the elicited venous pressure variations and the simulated congestive status.Discussion and ConclusionThe proposed non-invasive VenCoM device is able to provide a fast and repeatable CVP estimate, having a wide spectrum of potential clinical applications, including the monitoring of venous congestion in heart failure patients and in subjects with renal and hepatic dysfunction, as well as pulmonary hypertension (PH) that can be extended to pneumonia COVID-19 patients even after recovery. The device needs to be tested further on a large sample size of both healthy and pathological subjects, to systematically validate its reliability and impact in clinical setting.

Non-invasive assessment of central venous pressure in heart failure: a systematic prospective comparison of echocardiography and Swan-Ganz catheter

Assessing hemodynamics, especially central venous pressure (CVP), is essential in heart failure (HF). Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold-standard, but non-invasive methods are also needed. However, the role of 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) remains uncertain, and 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is not always available. This study investigated standardized and breathing-corrected assessment of inferior vena cava (IVC) volume using echocardiography (2DE and 3DE) versus CVP determined invasively using RHC. Sixty consecutive HF patients were included (82% male, age 54 ± 11 years, New York Heart Association class 2.23 ± 0.8, ejection fraction 46 ± 18.4%, brain natriuretic peptide 696.93 ± 773.53 pg/mL). All patients underwent Swan-Ganz RHC followed by 2DE and 3DE, and IVC volume assessment. On 2DE, mean IVC size was 18.3 ± 5.5 mm and 13.8 ± 6 mm in the largest deflection and shortest distention, respectively. Mean CVP from RHC was 9.3 ± 5.3 mmHg. Neither 2DE nor 3DE showed acceptable correlation with invasively measured CVP; IVC volume acquisition showed optimal correlation with RHC CVP (0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.46–0.77), with better correlation when mitral valve early diastole E wave and right ventricular end-diastolic diameter were added. Using a CVP cut-point of 10 mmHg, receiver operating characteristic curve showed true positivity (specificity) of 0.90 and sensitivity of 62% for predicting CVP. A validation study confirmed these findings and verified the high predictive value of IVC volume assessment. Neither 2DE nor 3DE alone can reliably mirror CVP, but IVC volume acquisition using echocardiography allows non-invasive and adequate approximation of CVP. Correlation with invasively measured pressure was strongest when CVP is > 10 mmHg.

Response of Jugular Venous Pressure to Exercise in Patients With Heart Failure and Its Prognostic Usefulness

Jugular venous pressure (JVP) has been established for the assessment of central venous pressure in patients with heart failure (HF), but data are limited regarding the response of JVP to exercise because of its complicated methods. Simplifying the estimation of JVP may be applied in such situations. JVP was assessed before and after the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in 81 patients with HF using a simple method by which the JVP was considered high when the internal jugular venous pulsation on the right side was visually identified above the right clavicle in the sitting position. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for worsening HF. None of the patients exhibited high JVP before the 6MWT and 11 patients (14%) had a high JVP after. The 6MWT distances were lower in patients with a high JVP after the 6MWT (338 ± 114 m) than those in patients without a high JVP (417 ± 78 m, p = 0.04). During a follow-up period of 13.4 ± 6.9 months, 11 patients died and 8 patients were hospitalized for worsening HF. The incidence of adverse cardiac events was higher in patients with a high JVP after the 6MWT (64%) than in patients without a high JVP after (64% vs 17%; hazard ratio, 7.52; 95% confidence interval, 2.69 to 20.83; p <0.001). In conclusion, high JVP after exercise was associated with exercise intolerance and poor prognosis. The response of JVP to exercise using this simple technique of physical examination may be a new approach for patients with HF for risk assessment.

Early rise in central venous pressure during a spontaneous breathing trial: A promising test to identify patients at high risk of weaning failure?

BackgroundThe spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) assesses the risk of weaning failure by evaluating some physiological responses to the massive venous return increase imposed by discontinuing positive pressure ventilation. This trial can be very demanding for some critically ill patients, inducing excessive physical and cardiovascular stress, including muscle fatigue, heart ischemia and eventually cardiac dysfunction. Extubation failure with emergency reintubation is a serious adverse consequence of a failed weaning process. Some data suggest that as many as 50% of patients that fail weaning do so because of cardiac dysfunction. Unfortunately, monitoring cardiovascular function at the time of the SBT is complex. The aim of our study was to explore if central venous pressure (CVP) changes were related to weaning failure after starting an SBT. We hypothesized that an early rise on CVP could signal a cardiac failure when handling a massive increase on venous return following a discontinuation of positive pressure ventilation. This CVP rise could identify a subset of patients at high risk for extubation failure.MethodsTwo-hundred and four mechanically ventilated patients in whom an SBT was decided were subjected to a monitoring protocol that included blinded assessment of CVP at baseline, and at 2 minutes after starting the trial (CVP-test). Weaning failure was defined as reintubation within 48-hours following extubation. Comparisons between two parametric or non-parametric variables were performed with student T test or Mann Whitney U test, respectively. A logistic multivariate regression was performed to determine the predictive value on extubation failure of usual clinical variables and CVP at 2-min after starting the SBT.ResultsOne-hundred and sixty-five patients were extubated after the SBT, 11 of whom were reintubated within 48h. Absolute CVP values at 2-minutes, and the change from baseline (dCVP) were significantly higher in patients with extubation failure as compared to those successfully weaned. dCVP was an early predictor for reintubation (OR: 1.70 [1.31,2.19], p<0.001).ConclusionsAn early rise in CVP after starting an SBT was associated with an increased risk of extubation failure. This might represent a warning signal not captured by usual SBT monitoring and could have relevant clinical implications.

P2473Non-invasive assessment of central venous pressure in heart failure: comparing three-dimensional echocardiography and Swan-Ganz catheter

Abstract Background Assessing hemodynamics, in particular central venous pressure (CVP) is essential in heart failure diagnostics, leading individual therapy. Hereby, invasive measurement through Swan-Ganz right heart catheterization (RHC) is considered gold standard for patient evaluation, but catheterization implies risks of invasiveness including bleeding, infection, vessel and nerve injury, as well as patient discomfort. Non-invasive methods are warranted, but no alternative technique is validated yet. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is believed to be uncertain in this approach as vena cava often shows ellipse-shapes. Therefore, this study sought to investigate standardized and breathing corrected three-dimensional inferior vena cava echocardiography (3DE) to directly compare CVP with right heart catheterization. Methods and results We prospectively included 100 consecutive heart failure patients in this study (mean age 53±12 years, body mass index 27±5, New York Heart Association functional class 2.3±0.6, left ventricular ejection fraction 34.1±12.8%, brain natriuretic peptide 658.13±974.03, 76% male), all underwent Swan-Ganz right-heart catheterization and immediately both 2DE and 3DE (Philips EPIQ 7G) of inferior vena cava. From two-dimensional data the diameter of IVC was measured perpendicularly in long and short-axis. From 3DE data a cross-sectional image of IVC was reconstructed for both vertical and horizontal diameters of IVC as well as the area of IVC. Established 2DE images revealed mean vena cava sizes of 15.9±5.9 mm, while standardized cross-sectional breathing corrected 3DE images showed diameters of 19.8±7.8 mm in longitudinal axis and 15.74±7.8 in short axis. RHC mean CVP was 9.00±5.4 mmHg and correlation of CVP and 2DE measurements failed adequate correlation (2DE 95% CI 0.19–1.61; r=0.25; p=0.312). However, 3DE axis ratio assessment correlated well with invasive CVP and showed reproducible results (3DE 95% CI 0.26–0.69; r=0.89; p&lt;0.01). This resulted for a CVP cut point of 10 mmHg in a 89% true negative and 50% true positive correct detection. Conclusions Standardized 3DE correlates well with invasive CVP while established 2DE usual care assessment does not show reliable CVP correlation. 3DE CVP assessment may represent a more feasible and easily applicable method for CVP measurement, including absence for risks of right heart catheterization. Further studies are ongoing to validate these findings in the future.

A novel noninvasive method for remote heart failure monitoring: the EuleriAn video Magnification apPLications In heart Failure studY (AMPLIFY)

Current remote monitoring devices for heart failure have been shown to reduce hospitalizations but are invasive and costly; accurate non-invasive options remain limited. The EuleriAn Video Magnification ApPLications In Heart Failure StudY (AMPLIFY) pilot aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a novel noninvasive method that uses Eulerian video magnification. Video recordings were performed on the neck veins of 50 patients who were scheduled for right heart catheterization at the Palo Alto VA Medical Center. The recorded jugular venous pulsations were then enhanced by applying Eulerian phase-based motion magnification. Assessment of jugular venous pressure was compared across three categories: (1) physicians who performed bedside exams, (2) physicians who reviewed both the amplified and unamplified videos, and (3) direct invasive measurement of right atrial pressure from right heart catheterization. Motion magnification reduced inaccuracy of the clinician assessment of central venous pressure compared to the gold standard of right heart catheterization (mean discrepancy of −0.80 cm H2O; 95% CI −2.189 to 0.612, p = 0.27) when compared to both unamplified video (−1.84 cm H2O; 95% CI −3.22 to −0.46, p = 0.0096) and the bedside exam (−2.90 cm H2O; 95% CI −4.33 to 1.40, p = 0.0002). Major categorical disagreements with right heart catheterization were significantly reduced with motion magnification (12%) when compared to unamplified video (25%) or the bedside exam (27%). This novel method of assessing jugular venous pressure improves the accuracy of the clinical exam and may enable accurate remote monitoring of heart failure patients with minimal patient risk.

Role of Internal Jugular Vein Ultrasound Measurements in the Assessment of Central Venous Pressure in Spontaneously Breathing Patients: A Systematic Review.

Few studies have tested the role of the internal jugular vein (IJV) ultrasonographic (US) diameters in the assessment of central venous pressure (CVP) in spontaneously breathing patients. No review or meta-analysis is currently available on the role of IJV assessment in this setting. The aim of this systematic review is to check the reliability and accuracy of IJV US diameters in predicting CVP and to evaluate its correlation with CVP in spontaneously breathing patients. This systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We included studies on the accuracy and reliability of the IJV ultrasound measures and studies exploring its correlation with CVP in adult spontaneously breathing patients. The studies' report quality was assessed by Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 scales. A total of five studies was eligible for final analysis. The studies on IJV ultrasound measures showed a good quality in reporting. The anterior-posterior diameter maximum of IJV (AP-IJV Dmax) showed the best correlation with the CVP with a good inter-rater reliability and validity in predicting CVP. All measures showed good inter-rater reliability and validity in predicting CVP, but only the AP-IJV Dmax showed good correlation with CVP. The AP-IJV Dmax could be a potential surrogate of CVP because of its good reliability and validity in predicting CVP value and its fair-moderate correlation with CVP. Anyway, further research should confi rm these conclusions.

Assessment of Central Venous Catheterization Using Electrocardiographic versus Landmark Techniques in Pediatrics Undergoing Open Heart Surgery; Which Technique is Superior?

Introduction: Central venous catheterization has been usually performed during major surgeries in order of central venous pressure assessment and fluid therapy. Variety of techniques has been performed for central venous catheterization previously but the information in this regard about pediatrics is limited. In the current study, the comparison of electrocardiographic technique with landmark one for central venous catheterization performance has been done. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted on 75 patients underwent central venous catheterization for elective cardiovascular thoracic surgery. In the first step, the location of catheterization was estimated based on body surface landmarks. Then catheterization was done using electrocardiography. Then by cardio-surgeon aid, during open cardiac surgery, the catheter tip location was found (gold standard). Finally, chest X-ray was taken and catheter place based on radiological markers was recorded.Results: In the current study, 75 children with age under 18 years and gender distribution of 42.7% females and 57.3% males were assessed. Mean of central venous catheter depth in gold standard method was 7.5±1.35 centimeters. Significant association between central venous catheter placement in gold standard technique and both landmark and electrocardiographic was seen (P-value&lt;0.001; r=0.94 and P-value&lt;0.001; r=0.77). Logistic regression showed a significant association between weight and placement of catheter tip in landmark technique (P-value=0.038) as following formula (Depth of central venous catheter= 5.33+0.07*weight).Conclusion: Our study showed that the use of ECG for CVC considering carina-to-tip as reference was superior to the landmark. In addition, catheter tip correct position was affected by weight but not height based on landmark technique.

Bedside Ultrasound Improves The Accuracy of Jugular Venous Pressure Assessment

Background Evaluation of jugular venous pressure (JVP) can provide a valuable estimate of intravascular volume status, however its sensitivity and accuracy are operator dependent and highly variable. Hypothesis Bedside ultrasound (US) of the internal jugular vein will improve the accuracy of JVP assessment. Methods Three internal medicine residents underwent a 30-minute practicum on ultrasound assessment of JVP. Over the following 13 months the residents evaluated 64 total patients immediately prior to invasive right heart catheterization (RHC). The residents measured patients’ neck circumference and then assessed JVP first by physical exam (PE-JVP) followed by ultrasound (US-JVP, Site Rite, Bard Inc.). The results were compared to central venous pressure (CVP) measured by RHC (CVP-RHC) using correlation coefficients and receiver operating curve analysis. Results Overall, US-JVP was more sensitive than PE-JVP in detecting an elevated CVP (≥10 cm H2O) (91% versus 75%); however, specificity was just 46% for both. There was modest agreement between PE-JVP (r = 0.38, p Conclusion Use of bedside US improves the accuracy of noninvasive assessment of CVP, particularly in patients with larger neck circumference. As with any learned skill considerable inter-operator variability exists related to training and frequency of use.

Relationship of Central Venous Pressure to Body Fluid Volume Status and Its Prognostic Implication in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

BackgroundAlthough central venous pressure (CVP) is a surrogate measure of preload in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), it is a multifactorial index influenced not only by fluid volume status, but also by cardiac pump function and other factors. We aimed to elucidate the individual pathophysiological factors of CVP elevation in patients with ADHF by assessing the relationship between CVP and extracellular fluid volume status (EVS). Methods and ResultsWe quantified EVS in 100 patients with ADHF with the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis. CVP was also measured at the same time point. Subjects were categorized into tertiles according to their CVP-EVS ratios, and patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared among these tertiles. The upper-tertile group had a higher incidence of impaired right ventricular pump function, whereas the lower-tertile group had higher incidences of severe inflammation, hypoalbuminemia, and renal dysfunction. Patients in both the upper and lower tertiles had a significantly higher cardiac event rate than those in the middle tertile. ConclusionsThe combined assessment of CVP and EVS provides insight into both the total volume status and distribution of body fluid in ADHF patients, and it may have applications in guiding decongestive therapy and improving prognostic predictions.

P056: Non-invasive measurement of the central venous pressure using near-infrared spectroscopy versus point-of-care ultrasound

Introduction: A fundamental hemodynamic parameter, the central venous pressure (CVP) is rarely available in the emergency patient due the delay and risks inherent to central vein cannulation. Recently, two non-invasive strategies have emerged: a) point-of-care ultrasound to supplement traditional inspection the internal jugular waveform ; or b) near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) of the external jugular vein. Methods: Five medical students underwent standardized training on both NIRS device (Venus 2000 CVP; Mespere Life Sciences, Waterloo ON) and ultrasound-assisted CVP assessment. During prescheduled, randomly permuted and balanced shifts, a pair of students obtained blinded independent measurements using each device within 10 minutes of each other. High priority subjects likely to have abnormal CVP (e.g. vomiting, dehydrated, heart failure, sepsis) were approached preferentially, followed by a convenience sample of other eligible patients in the emergency department. Secondary outcomes were stopwatch-recorded time from device ready to stable measurement, as well as operator ease, operator confidence and patient discomfort. The blinded treating physician rated each subjects volume status on an ordered scale: depleted, neutral and overloaded. Results: We enrolled 104 patients (median [IQR] age 68 [53, 78] years; 50% male; BMI 27.6 [17.0, 47.7] kg/m2; admission rate 27%) in June-August 2017. Treating physicians classified 17 as volume depleted and 12 overloaded. CVP measurements differed widely between techniques: ultrasound 8 [7, 9] cmH2O (3 cases unobtainable) vs NIRS 12 [8, 17] cmH2O (13 unobtainable). Agreement and correlation between the two devices was extremely low (R2=0.04). While neither technique demonstrated a strong association with the treating physicians estimate of volume status, only the ultrasound values increased monotonically with physician estimate. With regards to secondary outcomes, ultrasound measurements took less time (paired difference 50 seconds [95% CI 7, 93]), and operators were more confident (0.63 [0.02, 1.23] out of 10) and at ease (0.78, [0.13, 1.43]) with ultrasound; patients rated discomfort equally (-0.06 [-0.30, 0.18]). Conclusion: Non-invasive measurement of CVP remains a challenge in the emergency department. The external jugular pressure by NIRS has very high variability and poor agreement with ultrasound-enhanced inspection of the internal jugular, suggesting that this technique is not yet practical for use by non-experts.