Aspiration Of Fluid Collections Research Articles

ESR Essentials: image guided drainage of fluid collections-practice recommendations by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe.

This ESR Essentials article intends to provide detailed, step-by-step, information on the role of imaging in the diagnosis, procedural management, and follow-up of patients with fluid collections. Evidence-based medicine recommendations for the positioning of percutaneous drainages and/or for diagnostic/therapeutic aspiration of fluid collections are provided. Although medical history, clinical symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory tests can raise suspicions regarding a collection, an imaging assessment is usually necessary for the diagnosis. Radiologists can easily identify fluid collections that are clinically suspected by using a wide range of imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, and cone-beam CT. Consequently, these imaging methods (either alone or combined), can be used to aspirate the collection or for the placement of a drainage catheter. The choice of imaging technique to be used is influenced by the location of the collection, operator preference, size, and content of the collection. In addition, it is of utmost importance to underline the role of the interventional radiologist in the management and follow-up of patients with percutaneous drains, in collaboration with surgeons, clinicians, and diagnostic radiologists. KEY POINTS: Indications for percutaneous imaging-guided drainage are supported by clinical findings, laboratory tests, and pre-procedural imaging. Deciding between aspiration or drain insertion should follow patient assessment and fluid collection characterization. The interventional radiologist should be part of the entire patient care process including follow-up.

US-guided Interventions to Diagnose and Treat Gynecologic and First-Trimester Disease.

US-guided procedures have an essential role in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple obstetric and gynecologic conditions, can be performed with either transvaginal or transabdominal approaches, and include biopsy of masses, aspiration of fluid collections, injection of therapeutic materials, and saline-infused sonohysterography and hysterosalpingo contrast-enhanced sonography. The full digital presentation is available online. ©RSNA, 2021.

Diagnostic yield of computed tomography-guided biopsy and aspiration for vertebral osteomyelitis.

The diagnostic yield of and best approaches for imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy for vertebral osteomyelitis is controversial. Early studies suggest yields of up to 90%; however, recent evidence shows lower yields of 30-40%. We aim to determine yield and predictors of yield in percutaneous CT-guided biopsies in vertebral osteomyelitis. We conducted a retrospective observational single-centre study cohort study of all patients presenting for vertebral biopsy or aspiration between 2014 and 2018. Only patients undergoing biopsy for suspected infection were included. Patients with malignant indications were excluded. Comprehensive review of medical records was performed for clinical presentation, comorbidities, imaging, biomarkers, microbiology and treatment. Overall, 40 out of 88 biopsies were performed for suspected infection, in 36 patients. Mean age was 59±18years; 29 (81%) were male. Of the 40 samples, an organism was identified in 14 samples (35%). Gram-positive organisms were most commonly identified; Staphylococcus aureus was cultured in 7 (50%) of samples. Mean admission CRP was significantly higher in patients with identified organisms compared to those without (137±106 vs 54±78, P=0.008). Aspiration was a strong independent predictor of positive microbiological growth on multivariate analysis (OR 6.52 [1.25-34.02], P=0.026). Biopsy or aspiration aided clinical decision-making in half of cases. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy has a modest yield for identifying the culprit organism in suspected cases of vertebral osteomyelitis. Elevated CRP and aspiration of fluid collections are associated with improved microbiological yield and should be considered in deciding when and where to biopsy.

Complex lymphatic anomalies

Complex lymphatic anomalies include several diagnoses with overlapping patterns of clinical symptoms, anatomic location, imaging features, hematologic alterations, and complications. Lymphatic malformations likely arise through anomalous embryogenesis of the lymphatic system. Analysis of clinical, imaging, histologic, and hematologic features is often needed to reach a diagnosis. Aspiration of fluid collections can readily define fluid as chylous or not. The presence of chyle indicates dysfunction at the mesenteric or retroperitoneal level or above the cisterna chyli due to reflux. The imaging patterns of generalized lymphatic anomaly (GLA) and Gorham–Stout disease have been segregated with distinctive bone lesions and peri-osseous features. More aggressive histology (spindled lymphatic endothelial cells), clinical progression, hemorrhage, or moderate hematologic changes should raise suspicion for kaposiform lymphangiomatosis. Biopsy may be needed for diagnosis, though avoidance of rib biopsy is advised to prevent iatrogenic chronic pleural effusion. Lymphangiography can visualize the anatomy and function of the lymphatic system and may identify dysfunction of the thoracic duct in central conducting lymphatic anomalies. Local control and symptom relief are targeted by resection, laser therapy, and sclerotherapy. Emerging data suggest a role for medical therapies for complications of complex lymphatic anomalies. Outcomes include recurrent effusion, infection, pain, fracture, mortality, and rarely, malignancy. Complex lymphatic anomalies present significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Results from a phase 2 study of sirolimus in these and other conditions are expected in 2014. Improved characterization of natural history, predictors of poor outcomes, responses to therapy, and further clinical trials are needed for complex lymphatic anomalies.

Role of ultrasound in renal transplantation.

Ultrasound examination of a renal transplant was performed in 27 patients over a period of 28 months; there were kidneys from 12 living and 15 cadaveric donors. The ultrasonic scans were performed over a period ranging from 2 days to 12 years following transplantation. We were able to observe and describe the echographic findings of the normal evolution of a well functioning renal transplant, acute tubular necrosis, acute and chronic rejection, perirenal fluid collection, and obstructive uropathy. Ultrasound evaluation of renal transplant was accurate in the diagnosis of postoperative complications together with clinical and laboratory findings. Ultrasound imaging is independent of renal function and can be performed quickly as often as necessary. Percutaneous procedures, including fine needle aspiration, biopsy, aspiration of fluid collection, and positioning of the pyelostomy catheter can be performed under ultrasonic guidance.