Aspects Of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Research Articles

Safety aspects during treatment with clozapine: : Adverse effects, titration, and therapeutic drug monitoring - a narrative review

According to current guidelines, clozapine should be used as athird step in treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). In everyday clinical practice, however, it is frequently used at amuch later stage, which leads to asignificant deterioration of prognosis. The first part of this narrative overview focuses on the most frequent side effects of clozapine, on the relevance of slow titration, and on specific aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Medline, the Guideline for the use of clozapine 2013 of the Netherlands Clozapine Collaboration Group, and the S3Guideline for Schizophrenia of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics were searched for relevant literature, the last query dating from April28th, 2023. Despite its unique efficacy clozapine is underused in clinical practice and prescription varies between and within countries. Next to hematological, metabolic, and vegetative side effects, clozapine induced inflammation manifesting in the form of pneumonia or myocarditis, which is mainly associated with rapid titration, represents amajor clinical challenge with CRP monitoring being of particular relevance. In this context, it also has to be noted that sex, smoking behavior, and ethnic origin impact clozapine metabolism, thus requiring personalized dosing. Slow titration when possible, TDM, and CYP diagnostics when appropriate increase patient safety during treatment with clozapine and thus the likelihood of early prescription of this compound in TRS.

Progress of triazole antifungal agent posaconazole in individualized therapy.

Posaconazole is the second-generation triazole antifungal agent with widespread clinical application. Posaconazole exposure is influenced by various factors such as drug interactions, disease state and diet, resulting in a high interindividual variability in many patients and failure to ensure therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct individualized therapy on posaconazole to ensure the efficacy and safety of treatment. Articles were identified through PubMed using the keywords such as "posaconazole," "therapeutic drug monitoring" and "Population pharmacokinetics" from 1 January 2001 to 30 April 2022. In this paper, we review the individualized treatment studies of posaconazole from the three aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring, population pharmacokinetic study and Monte Carlo simulation to provide reference for in-depth individualized posaconazole dosing studies. This review suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed in patients taking posaconazole to adjust the dosage and assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of posaconazole under different clinical conditions and different dosing regimens through Monte Carlo simulations. In the future, a more detailed delineation and comprehensive examination of posaconazole PPK for specific populations requires further study.

Personalized Medicine of Monoclonal Antibodies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pharmacogenetics, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, and Beyond.

The pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) has experienced significant progress with the advent of monoclonal antibodies (mABs). As therapeutic proteins, mABs display peculiar pharmacokinetic characteristics that differentiate them from chemical drugs, such as aminosalicylates, antimetabolites (i.e., azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and methotrexate), and immunosuppressants (corticosteroids and cyclosporine). However, clinical trials have demonstrated that biologic agents may suffer from a pharmacokinetic variability that could influence the desired clinical outcome, beyond primary resistance phenomena. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) protocols have been elaborated and applied to adaptation drug doses according to the desired plasma concentrations of mABs. This activity is aimed at maximizing the beneficial effects of mABs while sparing patients from toxicities. However, some aspects of TDM are still under discussion, including time-changing therapeutic ranges, proactive and reactive approaches, the performance and availability of instrumental platforms, the widely varying individual characteristics of patients, the severity of the disease, and the coadministration of immunomodulatory drugs. Facing these issues, personalized medicine in IBD may benefit from a combined approach, made by TDM protocols and pharmacogenetic analyses in a timeline that necessarily considers the frailty of patients, the chronic administration of drugs, and the possible worsening of the disease. Therefore, the present review presents and discusses the activities of TDM protocols using mABs in light of the most recent results, with special attention on the integration of other actions aimed at exploiting the most effective and safe therapeutic effects of drugs prescribed in IBD patients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of commonly used anti-infective agents: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of Australian hospital practices

When performed according to best-practice principles, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can optimise anti-infective treatment and directly benefit clinical outcomes. We evaluated TDM performance and clinical decision-making for established anti-infective agents amongst Australian hospitals. A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted between August and September 2019. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions regarding TDM of anti-infective agents in general as well as clinical vignettes specific to vancomycin, gentamicin and voriconazole. We sought to survey all Australian hospitals operating both in the public and private health sectors. Responses were captured from 85 unique institutions, from all Australian states and territories. Regarding guidelines, 26% of hospitals did not have endorsed guidelines to advise on the ordering, sampling and interpretation of TDM for any anti-infective agent. Admitting teams were predominantly responsible for ordering TDM (85%) and interpreting results (76%). Only 51% of hospitals had access to dose prediction software, with access generally better amongst principal referral (69%) (P = 0.01) and children's hospitals (100%) (P = 0.04). Whenever a laboratory-derived minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was not available to guide dosing decisions, a surrogate target MIC was assumed in 77% of hospitals. This was based on a ‘worst-case’ scenario infection in 11% of hospitals. The rates of clinical practice consistent with current guideline recommendations across all aspects of TDM were demonstrated to be 0% for vancomycin, 4% for gentamicin and 35% for voriconazole. At present, there is significant institutional variability in the clinical practice of TDM for anti-infective agents in Australia for established TDM drugs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric renal transplantation.

Finding the balance between clinical efficacy and toxicity of immunosuppressive drugs is a challenge in renal transplantation (RTx), but especially in pediatric RTx patients. Due to the expected longer life-span of pediatric transplant patients and the long-term consequences of drug-induced infectious, malignant and cardiovascular adverse effects, protocols which minimize immunosuppressive therapy make conceptual sense. In this context, therapeutic drug monitoring is a tool which provides support for the individualization of therapy. It has, however, limitations, and specific data in the pediatric cohort are comparatively sparse. There is large heterogeneity among the studies conducted to date in terms of methods, follow-up, endpoints, immunosuppressive regimens and patients. In addition, data from adult studies are not readily transferrable to the pediatric situation. This educational review gives a concise overview on aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric RTx.

Pediatric aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in renal transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used for maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric renal and heart transplant recipients. Children undergo developmental changes (ontogeny) of drug disposition, which may affect drug metabolism of the active compound mycophenolic acid (MPA). Therefore, a detailed characterization of MPA pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in this patient population is required. In general, the overall efficacy and tolerability of MMF in pediatric patients appear to be comparable with those in adults, except for a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse effects in children younger than 6 years. The currently recommended dose in pediatric patients with concomitant cyclosporine is 1200 mg/m(2) per day in 2 divided doses; the recommended MMF dose with concomitant tacrolimus or without a concurrent calcineurin inhibitor is 900 mg/m(2) per day in 2 divided doses. Recent data suggest that fixed MMF dosing results in MPA underexposure (MPA-area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12)), <30 mg × h/L) early posttransplant in approximately 60% of patients. To achieve adequate MPA exposure in most patients, an initial MMF dose of 1800 mg/m(2) per day with concomitant cyclosporine and 1200 mg/m(2) per day with concomitant tacrolimus for the first 2 to 4 weeks posttransplant has been suggested. As in adults, there is an approximately 10-fold variability in dose-normalized MPA-AUC(0-12) values between pediatric patients after renal transplantation, strengthening the argument for concentration-controlled dosing of the drug. Although the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA for graft outcome and patient survival is still controversial, potential indications are the avoidance of underimmunosuppression, particularly in patients with high immunologic risk in the initial period posttransplant, in patients who are treated with protocols that explore the possibilities of calcineurin inhibitor minimization, withdrawal or even complete avoidance, and steroid withdrawal or avoidance regimens that might also benefit from intensified therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA. An additional indication especially in adolescent patients is the monitoring of drug adherence. Therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA in pediatric solid organ transplantation using limited sampling strategies is preferable over drug dosing based on trough level monitoring only. Several validated pediatric limited sampling strategies are available. Clearly, more research is required to determine whether pediatric patients will benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA for long-term maintenance immunosuppression with MMF.

Analytical and Pharmacological Aspects of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of mTOR Inhibitors

Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors represent a new class of immunosuppressant drugs extensively used for the prevention and the treatment of graft rejection in organ transplant recipients. Their current use is due to referred low nephrotoxic effects, particularly important in kidney transplanted and/or patients with renal failure. The most representative drugs of such class are Sirolimus (Siro) and Everolimus (Rad). Both drugs show a narrow therapeutic window, therefore, monitoring of whole-blood drug levels is recommended in order to optimize the therapy. Among the available assays, Liquid Chromatography coupled with UltraViolet or Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry methods (LC/UV or LC/ESI-MSMS) are the most accurate and specific ones. A reliable alternative is represented by immunoassays, which offer the opportunity to minimize sample pre-treatment, thus reducing the time between drawing blood sample and measuring the drug concentration, an important aspect in high-throughput analyses. Despite this, a limitation in the use of immunoassays for therapeutic drug monitoring is the lower specifity compared with the chromatographic methods when analysing structurally-related drugs. New insights to optimize mTOR inhibitors regimens seem to be offered by the evaluation of CYP450 3A activity by using the probe drug approach. To such purpose, there are a number of major probe drugs used for in vivo studies including: midazolam, cortisol, lidocaine, nifedipine, dextromethorphan, erythromycin, dapsone and alfentanil. The aim of the present paper is to report the most recent knowledge concerning this issue, supplying a critical and comprehensive review for whom are involved both in the clinical and analytical areas.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib

Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib