The concept of illness behavior was introduced by Mechanic and Volkart in the 1960s and refers to the ways in which individuals experience, perceive, evaluate and respond to their own health status (1). Accordingly, behavioral responses to the same illness or the same physical symptom may vary widely among subjects and greatly affect the disease course and outcome. In past decades, important lines of research have been concerned with illness perception, coping, risk behavior, attendance at medical facilities, treatment-seeking behavior, and treatment adherence. They have, however, mostly investigated single aspects separately. We have recently suggested that the concept of illness behavior may provide a unifying framework to observations and findings that would otherwise remain scattered and unrelated in the medical literature (1). Aspects of illness behavior that have important clinical implications have been investigated in the setting of diabetes but have been otherwise understudied in endocrine disorders. Some issues are worth considering to improve effectiveness in the longitudinal management of endocrine patients. Delayed diagnosis is a challenging matter in clinical endocrinology. Early recognition of many endocrine disorders may be impaired by symptoms that are initially subtle and nonspecific as well as by the presence of psychiatric symptoms. Stern et al (2) found that 19.9% of patients with Graves’ disease received an accurate diagnosis more than 6 months after they had sought medical care. Indeed, several psychiatric symptoms such as irritability, anxiety, and sleep difficulties were found to be presenting manifestations of this condition (2). These symptoms are likely to be considered by the physician an expression of psychological disturbance and make the differential diagnosis difficult. Similarly, a patient’s interpretation of symptoms may also contribute to a delay in the diagnosis. In the same study (2), 35.1% of patients with Graves’ disease took more than 6 months to seek medical care after they had experienced their initial symptoms because they were interpreting them as a sign of psychological distress and were therefore reluctant to seek help. Once a subject receives a diagnosis of an endocrine disease, he/she is usually required to undergo regular follow-up visits. According to some preliminary findings, nonattendance at outpatient visits is an important phenomenon in endocrinology. In a large patient population at the Taiwan University Hospital where this issue was examined over a period of 6 months in endocrinology and metabolism outpatient clinics, booked visits were not attended at a rate of 73% (3). In the same study, nonattendance was predicted by features concerning both the patient (eg, younger age) and the physician (eg, teaching status) as well as some appointment characteristics (eg, first-time visit) (3). However, the role of psychosocial variables (eg, patients’ illness attitudes) as potential predictors of nonattendance was not explored. In some instances, decreased motivation by the patient to attend follow-up visits may be determined by a lack of perceived symptoms. In a study by Kasuki et al (4), 17.6% of acromegalic patients were not attending follow-up visits at their reference centers for more than 1 year. Many of them stopped attending the acromegalic outpatient clinic because they were not experiencing symptoms and were not feeling sick, even though they were found to still have active acromegaly. There were no significant differences between
Read full abstract