AS03-adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine Research Articles

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Will They Be Safe and Effective and How Will We Know?

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Will They Be Safe and Effective and How Will We Know?

Adjuvantation of Influenza Vaccines to Induce Cross-Protective Immunity.

Influenza poses a huge threat to global public health. Influenza vaccines are the most effective and cost-effective means to control influenza. Current influenza vaccines mainly induce neutralizing antibodies against highly variable globular head of hemagglutinin and lack cross-protection. Vaccine adjuvants have been approved to enhance seasonal influenza vaccine efficacy in the elderly and spare influenza vaccine doses. Clinical studies found that MF59 and AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccines could induce cross-protective immunity against non-vaccine viral strains. In addition to MF59 and AS03 adjuvants, experimental adjuvants, such as Toll-like receptor agonists, saponin-based adjuvants, cholera toxin and heat-labile enterotoxin-based mucosal adjuvants, and physical adjuvants, are also able to broaden influenza vaccine-induced immune responses against non-vaccine strains. This review focuses on introducing the various types of adjuvants capable of assisting current influenza vaccines to induce cross-protective immunity in preclinical and clinical studies. Mechanisms of licensed MF59 and AS03 adjuvants to induce cross-protective immunity are also introduced. Vaccine adjuvants hold a great promise to adjuvant influenza vaccines to induce cross-protective immunity.

Narcolepsy and Pandemic Influenza Vaccination: What We Need to Know to be Ready for the Next Pandemic.

After the initial identification of the H1N1 pandemic influenza strain in Mexico in April 2009 and its subsequent global spread, several monovalent influenza vaccines were developed as part of the pandemic response. Three of these vaccines, Pandemrix, Arepanrix and Focetria were adjuvanted. One of these, the AS03-adjuvanted Pandemrix vaccine, was primarily used in Europe. Following widespread Pandemrix vaccine administration in Scandinavia, an increased risk of narcolepsy was noted in observational studies. Subsequently, this increased risk was also reported in other European countries as well. In contrast, studies from Canada of a similar AS03-adjuvanted vaccine, Arepanrix, did not demonstrate a similar increased risk of narcolepsy. No studies have identified an increased risk of narcolepsy following the MF59-adjuvanted Focetria vaccine. For many potential pandemic influenza strains, adjuvants might be required to solicit a protective immune response. Thus, it is critical that we understand the nature of the association between adjuvanted vaccine receipt and narcolepsy. Here, we present a potential hypothesis for narcolepsy seen during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine recipients.

A clinical phase I study of an EB66 cell-derived H5N1 pandemic vaccine adjuvanted with AS03

BackgroundWe conducted a phase I clinical trial of a cell culture-derived AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine containing HA antigen (A/Indonesia/05/2005(H5N1)/PR8-IBCDC-RG2) derived from EB66 cells (KD-295). MethodsHealthy male adult volunteers (20–40 years old, N=60) enrolled in the study were divided into 3 groups, the MA group (3.8μg of HA+AS03), HA group (7.5μg of HA+AS03), and 1/2 MA group (half the volume of the MA group), and received KD-295 intramuscularly twice with a 21-day interval. After administration of KD-295, adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, and immune response to the vaccine strain and heterologous virus strains were evaluated. ResultsNo severe adverse events leading to discontinuation of vaccine administration occurred. The vaccine was well-tolerated. There was no dose dependency in the rate, timing, or duration of the adverse events. Immunogenicity of the vaccines was evaluated by HI (hemagglutination inhibition) assay, which confirmed that the antibody response to the vaccine strain and heterologous strain in all groups met the three criteria for immunogenicity described in the Japanese guidelines for development of a pandemic prototype vaccine. We also measured the neutralizing antibody titers against several virus strains, and confirmed a significant rise in antibody levels to both the vaccine strain and heterologous strains. ConclusionThe EB66-derived H5N1 influenza vaccine adjuvanted with AS03 elicited a broad cross-reactive antibody response among H5N1 strains with acceptable reactogenicity. Therefore, KD-295 can be considered a useful pandemic and pre-pandemic influenza vaccine candidate.

Perinatal survival and health after maternal influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination: A cohort study of pregnancies stratified by trimester of vaccination

Large cohort studies demonstrated the safety of vaccination with the AS03 adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine, but data on first trimester vaccination safety are limited.We conducted a nationwide register-based retrospective cohort study in Finland, included singleton pregnancies present on 01 November 2009 and followed them from 01 November 2009 until delivery. Pregnancies with abortive outcome, pregnancies that started before 01 February 2009 and pregnancies of women, who received the AS03 adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine prior to the onset of pregnancy, were excluded. Our main outcome measures were hazard ratios comparing the risk of stillbirth, early neonatal death, moderately preterm birth, very preterm birth, moderately low birth weight, very low birth weight, and being small for gestational age between pregnancies exposed and unexposed to maternal influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination.The study population comprised 43,604 pregnancies; 34,241 (78.5%) women were vaccinated at some stage during pregnancy. The rates of stillbirth, early neonatal death, moderately preterm birth, and moderately low birth weight were similar between pregnant women exposed and unexposed to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination. After adjusting for known risk factors, the relative rates were 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.55–1.45) for very preterm birth, 0.84 (0.61–1.16) for very low birth weight, and 1.17 (0.98–1.40) for being small for gestational age. Also, in the subanalysis of 7839 women vaccinated during the first trimester, the rates did not indicate that maternal vaccination during the first trimester had any adverse impact on perinatal survival and health.The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes was not associated with the exposure to the AS03 adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine. This study adds reassuring evidence on the safety of AS03 adjuvanted influenza vaccines when given in the first trimester and supports the recommendation of influenza vaccination to all pregnant women through all stages of pregnancy.

Safety of AS03-adjuvanted inactivated split virion A(H1N1)pdm09 and H5N1 influenza virus vaccines administered to adults: Pooled analysis of 28 clinical trials

Clinical trials have shown that AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 and A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines are highly immunogenic, although with an increased reactogenicity profile relative to non-adjuvanted vaccines in terms of the incidence of common injection site and systemic adverse events (AEs). We evaluated pooled safety data from 22,521 adults who had received an AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 or A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza or control vaccine with the purpose to identify medically-attended AEs (MAEs), including subsets of serious AEs (SAEs), potentially immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs), and AEs of special interest (AESI), and to explore a potential association of these AEs with the administration of an AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine. For participants who had received an AS03-adjuvanted vaccine, the relative risks (RRs) for experiencing a MAE or a SAE compared to control group (participants who had received a non-adjuvanted vaccine or saline placebo) were 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9; 1.1) and 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9; 1.4), respectively. The overall RRs for experiencing an AESI or a pIMD (AS03-adjuvanted vaccine/control) were 1.2 (95% CI: 0.9; 1.6) and 1.7 (95% CI: 0.8; 3.8), respectively. Thirty-8 participants in the AS03-adjuvanted vaccine group had a pIMD reported after vaccine administration, yielding an incidence rate (IR) of 351.9 (95% CI: 249.1; 483.1) per 100,000 person-years. The estimated IRs in the AS03-adjuvanted vaccine group were greater than the literature reported rates for: facial paresis/VIIth nerve paralysis, celiac disease, thrombocytopenia and ulcerative colitis. These results do not support an association between AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 and A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines and the AEs collected in the trials included in the analysis.

The adjuvant component α-tocopherol triggers via modulation of Nrf2 the expression and turnover of hypocretin in vitro and its implication to the development of narcolepsy

BackgroundAfter the H1N1 swine flu vaccination campaign an increased number of narcolepsy cases in children and adolescents was observed in Scandinavian and later in further European countries that correlated with the vaccination by an AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine (Pandemrix). Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder characterized by the loss of hypocretin in the cerebrospinal fluid due to selective destruction of hypocretin-producing neurons in the perifornical hypothalamus. In >99% of the cases narcolepsy is associated with the HLA-subtype DQB1*602 giving the link to an autoimmune process. In contrast to other squalene-based adjuvants, for which no association with narcolepsy was reported so far, ASO3 contains in addition α-tocopherol. It could be observed recently that α-tocopherol activates the transcription factor Nrf2. Nrf2 triggers the expression of cytoprotective genes, i.e. the catalytic active subunits of the constitutive proteasome, by binding to the antioxidant response element (ARE). It was hypothesized that α-tocopherol via activation of Nrf2 affects expression and turnover of hypocretin, leading to an increased amount of hypocretinα-specific fragments that bind to DQB1*602. Resultsα-Tocopherol activates Nrf2 in neuronal cells in vitro. Promoter analysis revealed an ARE sequence in the hypocretin promoter. Indeed, α-tocopherol increases by activation of Nrf2 the expression of hypocretin. In parallel, α-tocopherol -dependent induction of Nrf2 augments expression of catalytic subunits of the proteasome leading to increased degradation of hypocretin. Moreover, elevated activation of Nrf2 is associated with a decreased activity of NF-κB that results in an increased sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli. ConclusionIn case of a genetic predisposition (DQB1*602) α-tocopherol could confer to development of narcolepsy by activation of Nrf2 that finally leads to an elevated formation of longer hypocretin-derived fragments that can be presented by HLA-subtype DQB1*602. These cells are recognized by the immune system and due to their increased sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli they can be destroyed, finally leading to a lack of hypocretin.

AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in elderly people

AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in elderly people

High Non‐Specific T Lymphocyte Response to the Adjuvanted H1N1 Vaccine in Comparison with the H1N1/H3N2/B‐Brisbane Vaccine without Adjuvant

Shortly after the report of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1), vaccine manufacturers, in conjunction with public agencies, started developing a H1N1 vaccine. In 2009, various approaches were implemented around the globe. The United States and Australia finally approved only non-adjuvanted H1N1 influenza vaccines, whereas Canada and the EU also approved adjuvanted vaccines. In 2010, seasonal influenza vaccine without adjuvant was again widely accepted in both hemispheres. The addition of adjuvant to the vaccine enhances the immunogenity of the vaccine in the presence of a relatively low amount of antigen. However, it might also induce undesirable non-specific immune response. For this reason, we conducted a prospective observational study to monitor T cell absolute count and H1N1-specific immunogenicity after 2009 and 2010 immunization. Fourteen healthy volunteers received the monovalent H1N1 AS03 adjuvanted influenza vaccine (3.5 μg of H1N1 and squalene-based adjuvant) in October 2009. The immunization was associated with a significant increase in T lymphocyte absolute count (P < 0.0001), reaching abnormal values in 57% of subjects. During this period, none of the subject showed any manifestation of severe viral infection or inflammation. Acute infection by CMV or EBV viruses was also excluded. In October 2010, the same subjects received a seasonal non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine (15 μg of each: H1N1, H3N2, and B-Brisbane). However, after 2010 immunization, no change in T lymphocyte absolute count was observed. H1N1-induced immunogenicity was good for both vaccines. Our results suggest a pronounced non-specific T cell response after AS03-adjuvanted 2009 H1N1 vaccination.

A(H1N1)pdm09 Vaccination of Health Care Workers: Improved Immune Responses in Low Responders Following Revaccination

We conducted a clinical trial in October 2009 to evaluate the immunogenicity of the AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine (pH1N1 vaccine) in health care workers (HCWs). By 2 weeks after vaccination, 97% had protective hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) titers (≥ 40) however, 16% were low responders (LR) and failed to maintain a protective response 90 days after vaccination. We analyzed the humoral responses (HI, antibody-secreting cell [ASC], and serum immunoglobulin G [IgG]) in 15 LRs and 25 control HCWs. Twelve LRs were revaccinated with the pH1N1 vaccine, and 7 were subsequently vaccinated with the 2010 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine. We conducted a long-term analysis of the humoral and CD4(+) T-helper (Th) 1 responses. The LRs had a slower HI antibody response than the control HCWs, with protective antibody titers not reached until 2 weeks after vaccination in the majority of the participants. The LRs also had significantly lower IgG ASCs at day 7 and HA1-specific serum IgG responses at day 21, compared with the control HCWs. Revaccination with the pH1N1 vaccine elicited rapid HI antibody, ASC, memory B cell, and multifunctional CD4(+) Th1 cell responses. This study shows that revaccination of low-responding HCWs with the pH1N1 vaccine is required for maintaining long-term protection. NCT01003288.

A Prospective Study of the Factors Shaping Antibody Responses to the AS03-Adjuvanted Influenza A/H1N1 Vaccine in Cancer Outpatients

To identify the determinants of antibody responses to adjuvanted influenza A/H1N1/09 vaccines in a cohort of cancer outpatients. Patients with cancer and controls were enrolled in a prospective single-center field study. Two doses of AS03-adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine were administered to patients and one dose was administered to controls. Antibody responses were measured using hemagglutination inhibition and confirmed by microneutralization. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and seroprotection rates (defined as GMTs ≥40) were compared. Immunizations were safe and well tolerated in 197 cancer patients (lymphoma, 57; glioma, 26; lung or head and neck, 37; gastrointestinal, 41; breast, 36) and 138 controls. Similar seroprotection rates (82.3% versus 87%) and GMTs (336.9 versus 329.9) were achieved after two doses of adjuvanted vaccine in cancer patients and one dose in controls. Univariate analyses identified older age, prior immunization against seasonal influenza, lymphoma, CD4 count, active chemotherapy, and rituximab and steroid treatments as being associated with weaker antibody responses. However, only age and chemotherapy plus rituximab remained independent determinants of vaccine responses in multivariate analyses. Two doses of AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine elicited potent antibody responses in most cancer patients despite ongoing chemotherapy, with the exception of rituximab-induced B-cell depletion. Oncology patients treated in an outpatient setting benefit from preventive vaccination against influenza with adjuvanted vaccines.

Effectiveness of an Adjuvanted Monovalent Vaccine Against the 2009 Pandemic Strain of Influenza A(H1N1)v in Stockholm County, Sweden

Vaccination against the pandemic influenza A(H1N1)v was performed in many countries during 2009, but population-based data on vaccine effectiveness are lacking. We conducted a prospective cohort study involving all inhabitants in Stockholm County (n = 2,019,183) who were offered a monovalent AS03-adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)v vaccine (Pandemrix, GSK), between 12 October and 31 December 2009. Overall vaccine coverage was 52%. A Web-based register with data on all vaccinated was linked by unique personal identification number to mandatory reports of influenza A(H1N1)v diagnoses. Vaccine failure was defined as a diagnosis or admission to hospital because of influenza >14 days after vaccination. Risk factors associated with vaccine failure were investigated by conditional stepwise logistic regression in a nested case-control study. The weekly incidence rate ratio for being diagnosed with influenza among vaccinated versus nonvaccinated persons was calculated. Vaccine failure was seen in 25 patients, 11 children and 14 adults, of 2594 patients diagnosed with influenza A(H1N1)v. Compared with age-matched controls, patients with vaccine failure were more often immunocompromised (Hazard Ratio, 4.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.19-10.89). During the 4 weeks with maximum influenza activity, the relative risk per week for an influenza A(H1N1)v diagnosis in the vaccinated population was .06 (95% CI .008-.41), .13 (95% CI .06-.27), .05 (95% CI .02-.12), and .07 (95% CI .03-.15), respectively, corresponding to a weekly vaccine effectiveness of 87-95%. The monovalent AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine was highly effective in prevention of the pandemic influenza in Stockholm County. A single dose seemed to be sufficient in most, both children and adults, except in immunocompromised hosts.