Artificial Intelligence In Pathology Research Articles

Applications of artificial intelligence in digital pathology for gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for a positive outcome. The integration of artificial intelligence in the pathology field is increasingly widespread, including histopathological images analysis. In recent years, the application of digital pathology technology emerged as a potential solution to enhance the understanding and management of gastric cancer. Through sophisticated image analysis algorithms, artificial intelligence technologies facilitate the accuracy and sensitivity of gastric cancer diagnosis and treatment and personalized therapeutic strategies. This review aims to evaluate the current landscape and future potential of artificial intelligence in transforming gastric cancer pathology, so as to provide ideas for future research.

Explainable artificial intelligence in pathology

Explainable artificial intelligence in pathology

Explainable artificial intelligence in pathology

With the advancements in precision medicine, the demands on pathological diagnostics have increased, requiring standardized, quantitative, and integrated assessments of histomorphological and molecular pathological data. Great hopes are placed in artificial intelligence (AI) methods, which have demonstrated the ability to analyze complex clinical, histological, and molecular data for disease classification, biomarker quantification, and prognosis estimation. This paper provides an overview of the latest developments in pathology AI, discusses the limitations, particularly concerning the black box character of AI, and describes solutions to make decision processes more transparent using methods of so-called explainable AI (XAI).

Ethical and Regulatory Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pathology

Ethical and Regulatory Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pathology

Artificial Intelligence in Pathology

Artificial Intelligence in Pathology

Breaking Barriers: AI’s Influence on Pathology and Oncology in Resource-Scarce Medical Systems

The application of artificial intelligence to improve the access of cancer patients to high-quality medical care is one of the goals of modern medicine. Pathology constitutes the foundation of modern oncologic treatment, and its role has expanded far beyond diagnosis into predicting treatment response and overall survival. However, the funding of pathology is often an afterthought in resource-scarce medical systems. The increased digitalization of pathology has paved the way towards the potential use of artificial intelligence tools for improving pathologist efficiency and extracting more information from tissues. In this review, we provide an overview of the main research directions intersecting with artificial intelligence and pathology in relation to oncology, such as tumor classification, the prediction of molecular alterations, and biomarker quantification. We then discuss examples of tools that have matured into clinical products and gained regulatory approval for clinical use. Finally, we highlight the main hurdles that stand in the way of the digitalization of pathology and the application of artificial intelligence in pathology while also discussing possible solutions.

Overcoming diagnostic challenges of artificial intelligence in pathology and radiology: Innovative solutions and strategies

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about significant changes in the fields of pathology and radiology, particularly in the area of diagnostic accuracy. Although AI has enormous potential for enhancing the precision and effectiveness of diagnosis, it also presents an array of challenges. This review article examines the diagnostic challenges of AI in pathology and radiology. The article begins by giving a general review of AI and its potential applications in pathology and radiology. It then discusses the challenges posed by AI in the areas of data quality, generalization, interpretability, and hardware limitations. The article also explores the ethical and regulatory implications of AI in diagnostic settings, including issues of bias and transparency. Finally, the article offers potential solutions to address these challenges, such as standardization of AI algorithms, data sharing initiatives, saliency mapping, adversarial training of algorithms, cloud computing, edge computing, hybrid approaches, and increased collaboration between human experts and AI systems. Overall, this review highlights the critical importance of addressing the diagnostic challenges of AI in pathology and radiology to make sure AI is able to achieve its potential to enhance patient care.

Preparing Data for Artificial Intelligence in Pathology with Clinical-Grade Performance.

The pathology is decisive for disease diagnosis but relies heavily on experienced pathologists. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of artificial intelligence in pathology (AIP) to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, the impressive performance of deep learning-based AIP in laboratory settings often proves challenging to replicate in clinical practice. As the data preparation is important for AIP, the paper has reviewed AIP-related studies in the PubMed database published from January 2017 to February 2022, and 118 studies were included. An in-depth analysis of data preparation methods is conducted, encompassing the acquisition of pathological tissue slides, data cleaning, screening, and subsequent digitization. Expert review, image annotation, dataset division for model training and validation are also discussed. Furthermore, we delve into the reasons behind the challenges in reproducing the high performance of AIP in clinical settings and present effective strategies to enhance AIP's clinical performance. The robustness of AIP depends on a randomized collection of representative disease slides, incorporating rigorous quality control and screening, correction of digital discrepancies, reasonable annotation, and sufficient data volume. Digital pathology is fundamental in clinical-grade AIP, and the techniques of data standardization and weakly supervised learning methods based on whole slide image (WSI) are effective ways to overcome obstacles of performance reproduction. The key to performance reproducibility lies in having representative data, an adequate amount of labeling, and ensuring consistency across multiple centers. Digital pathology for clinical diagnosis, data standardization and the technique of WSI-based weakly supervised learning will hopefully build clinical-grade AIP.

Artificial Intelligence in pathology: current applications, limitations, and future directions.

Given AI's recent success in computer vision applications, majority of pathologists anticipate that it will be able toassist them with a variety of digital pathology activities. Massive improvements in deep learning have enabled asynergy between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep learning, enabling image-based diagnosis against thebackdrop of digital pathology. AI-based solutions are being developed to eliminate errors and save pathologiststime. In this paper, we will discuss the components that went into the use of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology, its use inthe medical profession, the obstacles and constraints that it encounters, and the future possibilities of AI in themedical field. Based on these factors, we elaborate upon the use of AI in medical pathology and provide future recommendationsfor its successful implementation in this field.

What Works Where and How for Uptake and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology: Review of Theories for a Realist Evaluation

There is increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in pathology to increase accuracy and efficiency. To date, studies of clinicians' perceptions of AI have found only moderate acceptability, suggesting the need for further research regarding how to integrate it into clinical practice. The aim of the study was to determine contextual factors that may support or constrain the uptake of AI in pathology. To go beyond a simple listing of barriers and facilitators, we drew on the approach of realist evaluation and undertook a review of the literature to elicit stakeholders' theories of how, for whom, and in what circumstances AI can provide benefit in pathology. Searches were designed by an information specialist and peer-reviewed by a second information specialist. Searches were run on the arXiv.org repository, MEDLINE, and the Health Management Information Consortium, with additional searches undertaken on a range of websites to identify gray literature. In line with a realist approach, we also made use of relevant theory. Included documents were indexed in NVivo 12, using codes to capture different contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes that could affect the introduction of AI in pathology. Coded data were used to produce narrative summaries of each of the identified contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes, which were then translated into theories in the form of context-mechanism-outcome configurations. A total of 101 relevant documents were identified. Our analysis indicates that the benefits that can be achieved will vary according to the size and nature of the pathology department's workload and the extent to which pathologists work collaboratively; the major perceived benefit for specialist centers is in reducing workload. For uptake of AI, pathologists' trust is essential. Existing theories suggest that if pathologists are able to "make sense" of AI, engage in the adoption process, receive support in adapting their work processes, and can identify potential benefits to its introduction, it is more likely to be accepted. For uptake of AI in pathology, for all but the most simple quantitative tasks, measures will be required that either increase confidence in the system or provide users with an understanding of the performance of the system. For specialist centers, efforts should focus on reducing workload rather than increasing accuracy. Designers also need to give careful thought to usability and how AI is integrated into pathologists' workflow.

Research on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology and Experimental Diagnosis

This article will explore the application research of artificial intelligence in pathology and experimental diagnosis. By analyzing the development trends of artificial intelligence technology in the medical field, this paper explores its specific applications and future development directions in pathology and experimental diagnosis. The application of artificial intelligence in pathology and experimental diagnosis will bring unprecedented convenience and accuracy to the medical field.

Overcoming the challenges to implementation of artificial intelligence in pathology.

Pathologists worldwide are facing remarkable challenges with increasing workloads and lack of time to provide consistently high-quality patient care. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to digital whole-slide images has the potential of democratizing the access to expert pathology and affordable biomarkers by supporting pathologists in the provision of timely and accurate diagnosis as well as supporting oncologists by directly extracting prognostic and predictive biomarkers from tissue slides. The long-awaited adoption of AI in pathology, however, has not materialized, and the transformation of pathology is happening at a much slower pace than that observed in other fields (eg, radiology). Here, we provide a critical summary of the developments in digital and computational pathology in the last 10 years, outline key hurdles and ways to overcome them, and provide a perspective for AI-supported precision oncology in the future.

Artificial Intelligence in Pathology: Friend or Enemy?

Artificial Intelligence in Pathology: Friend or Enemy?

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology: Trends and Challenges.

Given the recent success of artificial intelligence (AI) in computer vision applications, many pathologists anticipate that AI will be able to assist them in a variety of digital pathology tasks. Simultaneously, tremendous advancements in deep learning have enabled a synergy with artificial intelligence (AI), allowing for image-based diagnosis on the background of digital pathology. There are efforts for developing AI-based tools to save pathologists time and eliminate errors. Here, we describe the elements in the development of computational pathology (CPATH), its applicability to AI development, and the challenges it faces, such as algorithm validation and interpretability, computing systems, reimbursement, ethics, and regulations. Furthermore, we present an overview of novel AI-based approaches that could be integrated into pathology laboratory workflows.

Integrating artificial intelligence in pathology: a qualitative interview study of users' experiences and expectations

AbstractRecent progress in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked enthusiasm for its potential use in pathology. As pathology labs are currently starting to shift their focus towards AI implementation, a better understanding how AI tools can be optimally aligned with the medical and social context of pathology daily practice is urgently needed. Strikingly, studies often fail to mention the ways in which AI tools should be integrated in the decision-making processes of pathologists, nor do they address how this can be achieved in an ethically sound way. Moreover, the perspectives of pathologists and other professionals within pathology concerning the integration of AI within pathology remains an underreported topic. This article aims to fill this gap in the literature and presents the first in-depth interview study in which professionals' perspectives on the possibilities, conditions and prerequisites of AI integration in pathology are explicated. The results of this study have led to the formulation of three concrete recommendations to support AI integration, namely: (1) foster a pragmatic attitude toward AI development, (2) provide task-sensitive information and training to health care professionals working in pathology departments and (3) take time to reflect upon users' changing roles and responsibilities.

病理診断におけるデジタル化と人工知能の現状と展望

病理診断におけるデジタル化と人工知能の現状と展望

Will the bot take the lot? Looking rationally at the promises and threats of artificial intelligence in pathology

Will the bot take the lot? Looking rationally at the promises and threats of artificial intelligence in pathology

Artificial intelligence in prostate histopathology: where are we in 2021?

Artificial intelligence has made an entrance into mainstream applications of daily life but the clinical deployment of artificial intelligence-supported histological analysis is still at infancy. Recent years have seen a surge in technological advance regarding the use of artificial intelligence in pathology, in particular in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. We review first impressions of how artificial intelligence impacts the clinical performance of pathologists in the analysis of prostate tissue. Several challenges in the deployment of artificial intelligence remain to be overcome. Finally, we discuss how artificial intelligence can help in generating new knowledge that is interpretable by humans. It is evident that artificial intelligence has the potential to outperform most pathologists in detecting prostate cancer, and does not suffer from inherent interobserver variability. Nonetheless, large clinical validation studies that unequivocally prove the benefit of artificial intelligence support in pathology are necessary. Regardless, artificial intelligence may soon automate and standardize many facets of routine work, including qualitative (i.e. Gleason Grading) and quantitative measures (i.e. portion of Gleason Grades and tumor volume). For the near future, a model where pathologists are enhanced by second-review or real-time artificial intelligence systems appears to be the most promising approach.

Promote the application of artificial intelligence in pathology

Promote the application of artificial intelligence in pathology

Perspectives in pathomics in head and neck cancer.

Pathology is the cornerstone of cancer care. Pathomics, which represents the use of artificial intelligence in digital pathology, is an emerging and promising field that will revolutionize medical and surgical pathology in the coming years. This review provides an overview of pathomics, its current and future applications and its most relevant applications in Head and Neck cancer care. The number of studies investigating the use of artificial intelligence in pathology is rapidly growing, especially as the utilization of deep learning has shown great potential with Whole Slide Images. Even though numerous steps still remain before its clinical use, Pathomics has been used for varied applications comprising of computer-assisted diagnosis, molecular anomalies prediction, tumor microenvironment and biomarker identification as well as prognosis evaluation. The majority of studies were performed on the most frequent cancers, notably breast, prostate, and lung. Interesting results were also found in Head and Neck cancers. Even if its use in Head and Neck cancer care is still low, Pathomics is a powerful tool to improve diagnosis, identify prognostic factors and new biomarkers. Important challenges lie ahead before its use in a clinical practice, notably the lack of information on how AI makes its decisions, the slow deployment of digital pathology, and the need for extensively validated data in order to obtain authorities approval. Regardless, pathomics will most likely improve pathology in general, including Head and Neck cancer care in the coming years.