Articular Surface Replacement Research Articles

Long-term Follow-up on Revisions of a Recalled Large Head Metal-on-metal Hip Prosthesis: A Single Surgeon Series.

In 2010, a recall was issued for a specific monoblock large head metal-on-metal (MoM) hip prosthesis due to short-term revision rates of 12%-13% (articular surface replacement, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Warsaw, IN). High complication, infection, and rerevision rates for revised MoM implants have been reported. The purpose of the study is to report long-term outcomes and trend metal ion levels of this recalled MoM prosthesis from a single surgeon series. Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients that underwent revision of large MoM hip replacements between 2010 and 2015. Pre- and post-revision Harris Hip Score (HHS), cup abduction angles, anteversion angles, and cup sizes were compared. Survivorship and HHS were the primary outcomes measured; serum cobalt and chromium levels were secondary outcomes. Multivariate linear regression was used to examine the correlation between prerevision serum metal ion levels and HHS. A total of 24 hips (21 patients) met inclusion criteria. Mean time to revision was 4.12 years ± 1.1. Mean follow-up was 10.0 years (7-11.9 years). Mean HHS increased significantly after revision from 48.5 to 89.5 (P < .001). Higher prerevision cobalt levels were correlated with lower prerevision HHS (cobalt R= 0.25; chromium R= 0.3160). There was no correlation with prerevision cobalt (P= .2671) or chromium (P= .3160) with postrevision HHS. Most recent metal ion testing revealed a significant decrease in both cobalt (P= .0084) and chromium (P= .0115). Survival rate is 100%. Our study showed excellent survivorship and outcomes at 10 years. There were no failures for any reason including infection. This differs from previous studies and confirms excellent long-term results are possible with revision of this recalled MoM implant.

Are serum cobalt and chromium levels predictors for patient-reported outcome measures in the ASR hip resurfacing arthroplasty?

The aims of this study were to determine if an increasing serum cobalt (Co) and/or chromium (Cr) concentration is correlated with a decreasing Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in patients who received the Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), and to evaluate the ten-year revision rate and show if sex, inclination angle, and Co level influenced the revision rate. A total of 62 patients with an ASR-HRA were included and monitored yearly postoperatively. At follow-up, serum Co and Cr levels were measured and the HHS and the HOOS were scored. In addition, preoperative patient and implant variables and the need for revision surgery were recorded. We used a linear mixed model to relate the serum Co and Cr levels to different patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). For the survival analyses we used the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model. We found that an increase of one part per billion (ppb) in serum Co and Cr levels correlated significantly with worsening of the HHS in the following year. This significant correlation was also true for the HOOS-Pain and HOOS-quality of life sub scores. The overall ten-year survival rate in our cohort was 65% (95% confidence interval (CI) 52.5 to 77.6). Cox regression analysis showed a significant hazard ratio (HR) of 1.08 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.15; p = 0.028) for serum Co level. No significance was found with sex or inclination angle. This study shows that increasing serum Co and Cr levels measured in patients with an ASR-HRA are predictive for deterioration in HHS and HOOS subscales in the following year. Increasing serum Co and Cr should forewarn both surgeon and patient that there is a heightened risk of failure. Continued and regular review of patients with an ASR-HRA implant by measurement of serum Co/Cr levels and PROMs remains essential.

Long-Term Outcomes of Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) Implant in Hip Arthroplasty: A Single Institution Review.

Various metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THRs) have been found to have high short-term failure rates due to adverse responses to metal debris (ARMD). As a consequence, several low-performing THRs have been removed off the market. The purpose of this research was to look at the at least five-year outcomes of patients who had MoM hip arthroplasty at our institution. In one specialised centre between 2007 and 2008, 24 Articular Surface Replacement (ASRTM, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) MoM THRs (in 24 patients, mean age: 56.4 years) were implanted. DePuy ASR hip prosthesis for osteoarthritis or hip fractures were employed in the THR system. All patients were summoned back for a clinical assessment, and imaging was done as needed. The average period of follow-up was 8.0 years (6.0-10 years). In all, eight instances (33.3%) were discovered to have pseudotumors, four hips (16.7%) were revised, and one (4.1%) was operated for ARMD. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford ratings improved statistically significantly five years after surgery in all three areas of pain, disability, and stiffness; however, there was no statistically significant change in the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) (mental) score. MoM hip arthroplasty had a greater revision incidence at five years in our group, presumably owing to the adoption of a smaller femoral head size.

Long-term changes in blood metal ion levels in patients with hip resurfacing implants: implications for patient surveillance after 10 years follow-up.

Studies investigating changes in blood metal ion levels during the second decade of the implant lifetime in MoM hip resurfacing patients are scarce. Patients implanted with either Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) or Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip resurfacings with >10 years follow-up and repeated blood metal ion measurements were identified at 2 large specialist European arthroplasty centres. After excluding patients with initial metal ion levels >7 ppb, the proportion of patients with an increase in blood metal ion levels above previously validated implant-specific thresholds (cobalt 2.15 ppb for unilateral implants, cobalt or chromium 5.5 ppb for bilateral) was assessed. We included 2743 blood metal ion measurements from 457 BHR patients (555 hips) and 216 ASR patients (263 hips). Of patients with initial metal ion levels below implant specific thresholds, increases in cobalt or chromium level, respectively, to above these thresholds during the second decade were seen as follows: unilateral BHR (cobalt = 15.6%), unilateral ASR (cobalt = 13.8%), bilateral BHR (cobalt = 8.2%, chromium = 11.8%), bilateral ASR (cobalt = 8.5%, chromium = 4.3%). Measurement-to-measurement changes exceeding +2.15 ppb or +5.5 ppb were, however, uncommon during the second decade. Subgroup results with small diameter (<50 mm) implants were similar. We recommend less frequent blood metal ion measurements are needed (every 3 to 5 years) for hip resurfacing patients if initial values were below 7ppb.

11-Year outcomes in patients with metal-on-metal ASR hip arthroplasty

BackgroundWe analysed the long-term revision rate, clinical outcomes and metal ion concentrations in blood over time in patients who had undergone metal-on-metal Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip arthroplasty. MethodsA total of 38 patients (43 hips) were included: 24 patients (28 hips) underwent large-head total hip arthroplasty (XL THA), and 14 patients (15 hips) underwent hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). The median follow-up time was 11 (range 7-12) years. ResultsNone of 15 HRA implants were revised. Nine of 28 XL THA implants (32%) in 8 patients were revised. The Co ion levels significantly increased in the XL THA group (p=0.009) over a median time period of 84 (25-97) months. ConclusionThe levels of Co ions in blood were higher in the patients who had undergone XL THA and increased significantly over time.

AB121. SOH22ABS131. Focal articular surface replacement of the femoral condyle: the influence of patient selection on clinical outcome

AB121. SOH22ABS131. Focal articular surface replacement of the femoral condyle: the influence of patient selection on clinical outcome

Focal articular surface replacement as primary treatment for focal chondral defects of the femoral condyles: A series of 157 cases

BackgroundFocal chondral defects (FCDs) of the femoral condyle are common. Treatment has heretofore primarily consisted of non-surgical and biological treatments. Focal articular surface replacement (FASR) is an emerging technique utilizing small implants to essentially fill the FCD. Here we report functional outcome and re-operation rates following FASR as a primary treatment for FCDs of the femoral condyles. MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database including 327 FASR procedures was performed to identify patients who underwent FASR of the femoral condyle with a modular cementless metallic implant (HemiCAPTM) as a primary procedure. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected before and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 4 years after surgery. Implant revision and re-operation rate were recorded. Results157 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 9.4 ± 1.3 years (range 7.0 to 11.4 years). The average age was 40.2 ± 5.3 years, 85% involved the medial condyle, and the average defect size was 3.6 ± 0.5 cm2. Primary FASR resulted in functional improvement on the KOOS (+52%), OKS (+69%) and SF-36 (+50%) scores and a reduction in VAS scores (-70%) at 4-year follow-up. Revision rate was 0.64% and the re-operation rate was 11%. ConclusionThis retrospective case-series supports primary FASR with HemiCAPTM implants as an alternative to biological procedures to treat medium-sized FCDs (2.5–4 cm2) of the femoral condyle, although long-term follow-up is necessary to determine if the clinical outcome and low revision rate can be maintained.

Focal articular surface replacement of knee lesions after failed cartilage repair using focal metallic implants: A series of 132 cases with 4-year follow-up

BackgroundFocal articular lesions of the knee can be treated using several different techniques with generally good results, but failures are difficult to manage. Focal articular surface replacement (FASR) using metal implants could be a promising technique that allows defect geometry matching, congruency restoration and defect propagation prevention. Methods132 patients were included who underwent FASR between January 2009 and December 2013. Three different implants were used: 1. HemiCAP®; 2. UniCAP® and 3. HemiCAP® PF Classic for trochlear lesions. Primary outcome parameter was knee function assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score with a 4-year follow-up, secondary outcomes included survivorship and complications. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. ResultsFor all 132 surgeries combined (102 HemiCAP®, 11 UniCAP® and 19 HemiCAP® PF Classic implants), WOMAC scores significantly improved from 6 weeks onward until the end of the study (p < 0.001 for all time points). 4-year survival rate was 97.7%, and a re-operation rate of 12.1% was found. The HemiCAP® group revealed a slower WOMAC improvement in patients aged ≥40 years, combined with a trend towards lower final WOMAC scores and a higher re-operation rate in patients with a BMI ≥ 25. ConclusionsThis report shows good to excellent clinical results of FASR as a salvage procedure after failed cartilage repair, with a low re-operation rate and a high survival of 97.7% at 4-year follow-up. Although longer follow-up is required, this could be a valuable treatment option in these challenging cases, without limiting future options for surgical interventions when deemed necessary.

Living with a recalled implant: a qualitative study of patients\u2019 experiences with ASR hip resurfacing arthroplasty

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty is the traditional treatment for osteoarthritis in the hip joint. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty, with metal on metal bearing, is a modern concept initially developed mainly for young active people. The metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty implant, Articular Surface Replacement (ASR), was implanted in approximately 93,000 patients before it was recalled in 2010 due to a high complication rate. This study aimed to evaluate patients’ own experiences living with an implant that they knew had a high complication rate and had been recalled from the market.MethodsA total of 14 patients, still living with the implant, of a cohort of 34 patients were available for follow-up. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 patients where a majority actively sought for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), and subsequently underwent HRA with an ASR prosthesis between 11/21/2006 and 09/28/2009. The responses were analyzed using content analysis described by Graneheim and Lundman to compress text and identify categories and subcategories.ResultsThe results showed that most patients had already decided that they wanted a metal-on-metal HRA implant before meeting the surgeon. They expressed that the implant made it possible to live an active life. A majority did not think about the fact that they had a hip implant, because they lacked subjective pain. Most of the patients were positive about the annual exams at the hospital and wanted them to continue. None of them felt that their trust towards the healthcare system had changed after the implant recall. They expressed a belief that they would need new surgery sooner than they first thought.ConclusionsDespite all the attention when the ASR prosthesis was recalled, patients with ASR-HRA did not report themselves negatively affected by the recall in this group of patients where a majority had actively sought for an HRA procedure. The healthcare system has an obligation to continue the annual exams, even if the implant provider does not continue reimbursement.

Predictive factors affecting long-term survivorship of ASR metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Introduction: We present the outcome of 154 ASR (Articular Surface Replacement) hips performed at the P.D Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre in terms of revision rate, metal ion levels, and factors affecting survivorship. Further, determined the importance of serial metal ion estimation over single value with poorly functioning arthroplasties. Methods: A retrospective study of 154 ASR arthroplasties (136 patients) performed from April 2005 till March 2010 was conducted. Ninety-seven patients were available for final analysis. All patients were assessed for symptoms, radiographs, blood metal (chromium and cobalt), metal artefact reduction sequence (MARS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computerized tomography (CT). Results: Female gender, smaller femoral head, patients with a rising level of metal ion levels were more likely to have revision surgery. However, abnormal acetabular inclination/anteversion was not associated with the occurrence of raised metal ion levels, ARMD (adverse reaction to metal debris) or revision surgery. Patients with raised metal ion levels were more likely to have periprosthetic lucency, ARMD, and revision surgery. Median metal levels increased initially for the first three years. Still, patients who required revision surgery continued to have a metal ion rise until the point when revision surgery was performed. In contrast, patients who had a fall in metal ion levels did not require revision. Conclusion: A single metal ion value is less predictive of failing arthroplasties; instead, a rising trend of metal ion levels can better delineate arthroplasties which will require revision. ASR hips whose blood ion levels fell after an initial rise and showed a declining trend did well.

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients: international high-volume centres' report on the outcome of 11,382 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties in patients ⩽50 years at surgery.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients younger than 50 years poses significant challenges including postoperative limitations of activity and higher failure rates. Sub-par outcomes of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) in registries remain controversial due to multiple confounders. Favourable HRA results in some studies are often regarded as irreproducible. The aim of this study is to analyse HRA outcomes in a large international cohort. We compiled a database of 11,382 HRA patients ⩽50 years from an international group of 27 experienced HRA centres from 13 countries. 18 different metal-on-metal (MoM) HRA designs were included with a mean follow-up of 7.6 years. Outcomes were implant survivorship, revision rates, causes for revision, clinical scores and metal ion levels. Outcomes were compared between genders, sizes, implant types and pre-operative diagnoses. Overall cumulative Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 88.9% at 22 years (95% CI: 88.3-89.5%). 2 HRA designs (DePuy Articular Surface Replacement (ASR), and Corin Cormet Hip Resurfacing System (CORMET)) led to inferior results while all others yielded similar survivorships. Excluding ASR and CORMET, implant survivorship in 11,063 cases was 95% at 10 years and 90% at 22 years. In men, implant survivorship was excellent: 99% at 10 years and 92.5% at 21 years. In females, implant survivorship was 90% at 10 years and 81.3% at 22 years. The overall revision rate was 3.6% with most common reasons for revision being implant loosening and adverse local tissue reactions. The best survivorship was found in patients with osteoarthritis (95% CI, 92.1-93.3% at 22 years), the poorest was among dysplastic hips (78.3%; 95% CI, 76.5-80.1% at 20 years, p < 0.001). Comparable revision rates demonstrated here may mitigate some concerns for safety and longevity of MoM HRA implants. Higher demands for activity and functionality in younger patients make HRA a potential alternative to THA.

Superior patient reported outcome measures reported post Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) revision arthroplasty in the setting of an objective surgical indication

The Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip system displayed unexpectedly high failure rates. All patients who underwent revision arthroplasty at our institution were identified. Indications for revision were classified as objectively identifiable or performed for unexplained pain. Clinical outcomes, post ASR revision, were superior in cases where the aetiology for failure was identifiable. Pain and function improved reliably when a targeted objective indication was identified pre-revision, but failed to do so in cases of unexplained pain. Surgeons familiar with the results of this study will be empowered to discuss expectations and realistic outcomes with their patients undergoing complex revision arthroplasty cases.

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Implant-specific outcomes and risk factors for failure

BackgroundHip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) may be a suitable option for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, concerns regarding the extent of osteonecrosis, amount of defect under the prosthesis, and implant-related complications remain. This study aimed to report implant-specific outcomes and risk factors for failure of HRA in ONFH. MethodsA total of 202 HRAs (166 patients) performed by a single surgeon were investigated. The stage, size, and location of ONFH were evaluated using preoperative radiographs and magnetic resonance images. Clinical, radiographic results, and serum metal concentrations of articular surface replacement (ASR) and non-ASR devices were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the contributors of failures. The mean follow-up duration was 10.6 years. ResultsTwenty-six hips (12.9%) were operated with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR), 99 (49.0%) with ASR, and 77 (38.1%) with Conserve Plus. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 52.1 to 93.2 at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). Revision-free survivorships of non-ASR and ASR implants were 99.0% and 82.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the use of ASR prosthesis, greater combined necrotic angle, and smaller head size were associated with revision surgery. A large combined necrotic angle was the only independent risk factor for mechanical failure at the femoral side (P = 0.029). ConclusionHRA for ONFH using BHR and Conserve Plus implants demonstrated favourable clinical outcomes with high revision-free survival rates at 10 years. However, care should be taken for large necrotic lesions that can lead to femoral neck fracture or aseptic femoral loosening. The translational potential of this articleThis study suggests HRA performed for appropriately selected patients with ONFH can show excellent long-term clinical results. Therefore, HRA should remain as one of the treatment options for ONFH, and further development of HRA implants should be continued.

Current evidence from a worldwide, multicentre, follow-up study of the recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.

Our first aim was to report the longitudinal clinical performance of patients treated with the ASR Hip System, a metal-on-metal (MoM) device, in their mid- to late-term follow-up. Secondly, we sought to report on the reasons and risk factors for mid- to late-term implant failure. A total of 1721 ASR patients (1933 hips) from 16 centres in 6 countries were enrolled to a prospective, post-recall study. The average time to enrollment was 7.4 years from index surgery. Data from 3 follow-up visits over 2 years were analysed. Implant performance, based on ion levels and PROMs, was determined at each clinical visit. The proportion of those exhibiting good performance decreased over time for hip resurfacing (ASR HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (ASR XL) patients. ASR XL patients were likely to exhibit longitudinal blood metal ion increases regardless of symptom state. ASR HRA patients were more likely to present with and maintain good performance over time, especially males with high general health indicators. 6% of ASR HRA and 14% of ASR XL patients were revised throughout the study period. ASR XL THA patients are likely to exhibit blood metal ion increases without accompanying changes in symptom state, and therefore should be followed with annual blood tests at minimum. While appropriately selected ASR HRA patients were the most likely to exhibit low blood metal ion levels and report no symptoms, we recommend vigilant follow-up of all ASR patients to ensure that worsening clinical outcomes and asymptomatic soft tissue damage are not missed.

Fresh Osteochondral Resurfacing of the Patellofemoral Joint

Large osteochondral lesions of the knee in young patients continue to be a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons and the focus of continual research. This is particularly true if the injury is a consequence of a dysplastic trochlea and involves both articular surfaces of the biomechanically complex patellofemoral joint. To obtain a healthy and congruent patellofemoral joint, the use of a bipolar fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the patella and trochlea is one of the few options to biologically treat these injuries. This would achieve a replacement of the entire articular surface of the patellofemoral joint with a high number of viable chondrocytes and respect the unique structural characteristics of the cartilage. The aim of this study was to obtain symptomatic and functional improvements while delaying the timing of prosthetic surgery. We present a reproducible although demanding surgical technique to perform a bipolar fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the patella and trochlea.

Lsolated acetabular revisions of articular surface replacement (ASR) XL implants with highly porous titanium cups and Delta bearings.

Articular surface replacement (ASR) XL implants exhibit higher-than-expected revision rates, blood ion concentrations and soft tissue lesions, making revisions troublesome and potentially unsatisfying. Appropriate techniques and outcomes in ASR XL revisions are rarely documented. The aims of this study were the assessments of pre-revision data, post-revision clinical and radiographic outcomes and ion levels in isolated acetabular ASR XL revisions performed using highly porous titanium cups and Delta ceramic articulations. 18 isolated acetabular ASR XL revisions in 16 patients were performed using Ti-Por cups (Adler Ortho, Milan, Italy) and Delta bearings (CeramTec, Plochingen, Germany). Pre-revision demographic, clinical, radiological and implant-related features were assessed. Clinical and radiographic parameters (cup positioning, osseointegration) after revisions were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Ion concentrations in blood and urine were collected in pre-revision setting and 1 year after revision. 4 complications occurred in 3 different revisions (16.7%), 1 dislocation, 2 infections, 1 psoas impingement. No re-revision was performed at 5 years (1 scheduled arthroscopy). Good clinical outcomes were achieved (HHS score: 88.3 ± 9.2). All the cups showed reassuring signs of osseointegration (>3 parameters). Blood ion concentrations significantly decreased: patients with Co blood ion concentration over the threshold (7 μg/l) decreased from 76.5% to 0%. No pre-revision or intraoperative data influenced the revision outcomes. Highly porous titanium cups and Delta ceramic articulations provided reliable mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in isolated acetabular ASR XL revisions. Ion concentrations significantly decreased. Multicentre prospective controlled studies are required to confirm these preliminary outcomes.

Histopathological patterns seen around failed metal-on-metal hip replacements: Cluster and latent class analysis of patterns of failure.

We aimed to establish latent subtypes of histopathological patterns in failed metal-on-metal hip replacements. Tissue samples of the synovia from the neocapsule were retrieved from 284 revised ASR (Articular Surface Replacement) hip replacements and analyzed histologically. Hierarchical cluster analysis and polytomous latent class analysis were performed to establish the underlying structure and relationships of the histological observations and to find similar cohorts of cases. Clustering analyses suggested four distinct subtypes that could be readily and reasonably labeled and mapped against a recent consensus statement. The first two subtypes showed synovial necrosis, lymphocyte sheets, and abundant or thin histiocyte sheets. In addition, the first subtype showed abundant germinal centers and no metal particles either extracellularly or intracellularly. Metal particles were, however, seen in the second subtype. Hence, the first subtype was labeled "immunologic Type IV neosynovitis" and the second subtype "abrasion-induced inflammatory lymphocytic Type I neosynovitis." The third and fourth subtypes showed no perivascular and diffuse lymphocytes, but a higher number of metal particles intracellularly and extracellularly. The third subtype had synovial necrosis along with granulomas and was labeled "abrasion-induced necrotic Type I neosynovitis," whereas the fourth subtype had readily intact synovial lining, and this subtype was labeled "abrasion-induced foreign body Type I neosynovitis." Histopathological findings in failed MoM hips are not just one wide entity. These hips evince four different histological patterns that also differ at the macroscopic level. Moreover, the often stated "ALVAL-type reaction" seems to be dualistic in nature, which is a novel finding.

The 10-year outcomes of the ASR XL Acetabular System: a single-center experience from China

BackgroundThe revision rate of articular surface replacement (ASR) implants continues to rise in China because of metal debris. However, there are few reports on the clinical results of ASR implants with prolonged follow-up time in China. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and the risk factors of revision surgery in patients with ASR implants.MethodsIn total, 74 patients (74 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ASR implants over the past 4 to 10 years were retrospectively analyzed. Relevant clinical, radiographic, and biochemical data were examined.ResultsThe average follow-up time was 88.46 (range 23–114) months, and the ASR implants of 18 hips (24.3%) were revised. Patients who received revision surgery had worse joint function with significantly lower Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index than non-revision patients (61.11 ± 6.68 vs 85.30 ± 9.16, p < 0.001; 61.00 ± 3.83 vs 79.04 ± 14.49, p < 0.001; respectively). Higher acetabular abduction angle and serum Co and Cr concentration were significantly relevant to worse joint function as measured by HSS (p = 0.018, 0.009, 0.043, respectively). ROC curve analysis was applied to categorize the optimal cutoff values of acetabular abduction angle and serum Cr and Co concentration for revision surgery, which were settled as 47.80°, 98.44 μg/L, and 6.95 μg/L, respectively. Overall survival of the prostheses with high acetabular abduction angle (> 47.80°, HR = 70.145, 95% CI 1.558–3158.213, p = 0.029), high serum Cr concentration (98.44 μg/L, HR = 58.956, 95% CI 1.294–2685.203, p = 0.036), and high serum Co concentration (> 6.95 μg/L, HR = 179.511, 95% CI 2.360–13656.941, p = 0.019) decreased significantly than the lower groups.ConclusionsEvaluation of the DePuy ASR XL articulation demonstrated increased rates of revision following a longer follow-up period. High acetabular abduction angle and serum Cr and Co concentration correlated with worse clinical outcomes and high revision rate. Therefore, we advocate that patients with DePuy ASR XL implants be followed up more closely than those with other implants, especially with high acetabular abduction angle and serum Cr or Co concentration.

Ultrasound-based decision making following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty

BackgroundMetal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a very controversial procedure because of the possibility of postoperative adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR). This study investigates the reliability of the ultrasound scan as a diagnostic tool to quantify a clinically useful threshold in the level of periprosthetic fluid collection to suggest implant revision. MethodsThis study includes 116 patients (123 implants) who received an Articular Surface Replacement XL (ASRTMXL, De Puy Synthes, USA) MoM THA. The study group included 56 males and 60 females with a mean age of 66.6 years (range, 15–86 years). All patients were clinically and radiologically annually evaluated (according to the Harris Hip Score) up to a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (min. 1.4 – max. 10.3 years) from the primary surgery: all patients underwent standard ultrasound evaluation of the affected hip and Cobalt/Chromium blood detection testing according to a custom-made diagnostic algorithm for MoM THA revision. ResultsAt final follow-up, 51 (43.1%) of 117 implants underwent revision after a mean of 6 years (1.79–9.26) from the primary ASR implant. The authors found a statistically significant correlation between Cr (p = 0.015) and Co (p = 0.009) blood values and different ultrasound grades. Statistical analysis showed a significant association between periprosthetic fluid collection and revision surgery (p < 0.0001) and the final revision risk was estimated to be 7 times greater in patients with ultrasound grade ≥ 2 (peri-prosthetic collection ≥ 20 mm). ConclusionsThis study confirms the reliability of ultrasound evaluation in detecting clinically significant peri-prosthetic joint effusions: a new diagnostic algorithm for MoM THA revision is here presented. Longer follow up studies are mandatory to better understand the potential advantages of this diagnostic protocol.

Framing the failure of medical implants: Media representations of the ASR hip replacements in the UK.

BackgroundDuring the twentieth century, hip replacement became one of the most popular and successful operations. In the 1990s, a new type of hip replacement namely the metal‐on‐metal hip resurfacing was developed. This paper draws on one of the available implants, namely the DePuy Orthopaedics’ Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip system which was withdrawn from the market because of higher than expected rates of failure. It examines media representations on the failure of the ASR metal‐on‐metal hip replacement device and its subsequent withdrawal from the market.MethodsDrawing on content analysis this paper explores how systemic failure of the medical implant was framed and performed by press media in the UK.ResultsTwo narratives were particularly important in framing press media coverage of the ASR case: the role of patients as passive recipients of care and a distinction between health and disability identities as related to how individuals’ narratives about the past shaped their sense of present and future. In all cases, the voice of the orthopaedic surgeons responsible for the selection and implantation of the ASR devices remains silent.ConclusionsPress media coverage of medically induced harm in the UK is significantly less common than coverage of any other patient safety issues and public health debates. This study aims to contribute to the evidence base on how public discourse on medically induced harm becomes framed through the reported experiences of individuals in press media and also how this process influences the legitimacy of various solutions to medical errors or unanticipated outcomes.