KEVIN J. HARTY, ed., The Holy Grail on Film: Essays on the Cinematic Quest. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co., Inc., Publishers, 2015. Pp. ix, 245. isbn: 978-0-7864-2 (pbk); 978-1-4766-2053-4 (ebook). $45; $29.99This book, rather like life, as defined in the memorable words of the forgettable Forrest Gump, is 'a box of chocolates,' because 'you never know what you are going to get.' Like that confection, this box of chocolates is varied, tasty, and full of surprises. If some of the treats are crunchier, some chewier than others (and some, perhaps, not quite everybody's favorite) that is simply to be expected in a sampler confected by such a variety of confiseurs.The essays consider films that date from the invention of film (Kevin J. Harty's 'Holy Grail, Silent Grail') to the first decade of the twenty-first century (The Librarian: Curse of the Judas Chalice from 2008, discussed in David Marshall's 'Holy Grail, Schlocky Grail,' seems to be the most recent film considered in the volume). Thus, from Thomas Edison's 1904 attempt to film the Met's 1903 production of Parzifal to the films discussed in Marshall's essay, the volume covers over a century of cinematic Grails. The Grails are found in films of high art (Bresson's Lancelot) and low (Sandler's Waterboy), religious (The Silver Chalice) and secular (Monty Python and the Holy Grail), good and bad (you choose), and sometimes a Grail is found where there is scarcely a Grail to be seen (see Paul Sturtevant's ingenious essay, 'A Grail or a Mirage? Searching the Wasteland of The Road Warrior').The films in which an actual Grail is present are discussed by Kevin J. Harty, Kevin Whetter ('The Silver Chalice: The Once and Future Grail'), Raeleen Chai-Escholz and Jean-Marc Elscholz ('John Boorman's Excalibur and the Irrigating Light of the Grail'), and Joseph M. Sullivan ('A Son, His Father, Some Nazis and the Grail: Lucas and Spielberg's Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade'). Harty provides an invaluable introduction to the earliest years of the Grail on film and the unsettling intrusion (covert and not) of Nazi ideology in some of these early films. Kevin Whetter introduces us to the first really bad blockbuster discussed in this collection, a film disowned by its own star, Paul Newman. Whetter also gives us the history of the first (and only) 'real Grail' discussed in the collection (although Harty's introduction discusses one of the other 'real Grails,' Valencia's prized 'santo caliz'), the Antioch Chalice, the discovery of which inspired Costain's novel, the film's source. The Elscholz and Elscholz essay provides a beautiful and illuminating discussion of the flowing, liquid light of the Grail, while Sullivan discusses a film in which the Grail intriguingly holds a position as a 'MacGuffin,' Hitchcock's infinitely malleable object. This MacGuffiny function raises the question of whether a grail needs to be sought, or even to exist, for a film to be considered a Grail film.Two essays in the collection address those Grail-less films in dramatically different ways. Joan Grimbert's elegant essay ('Lancelot du Lac: Robert Bresson's Arthurian Realism') considers a film in which the Grail is both absent and everywhere present, a Grail, in a sense, sous rature, in the phrase popularized by Heidegger and Derrida. In the Wasteland of Bresson's film, the Grail underlies the inexplicable loss experienced by Arthur's knights, who have not achieved the object of their quest, but seem unable to recall the notion of a Grail or even a quest. Viewed in this way, Bresson's Grail leads directly to his presentation of Lancelot as the knight. In a dramatically different way, Paul Sturtevant's essay ('A Grail or a Mirage? Searching the Wasteland of The Road Warrior') addresses a film with an unbearably present Wasteland that is as empty of anything Grail-like as it is of anything like a Grail hero. It, indeed, has Mel Gibson in impressive leather, but if he seeks for anything it is oil to fuel the film's remarkable vehicles; the medieval equivalent would have been, it would seem, the quest for hay. …