Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery Research Articles

Distal Mononeuropathy and Nerve Release After Open and Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Matched Cohort Analysis

The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who have undergone prior open or arthroscopic shoulder surgery and develop distal mononeuropathy (DMN) achieve the same clinical benefit after nerve release compared with those who did not have a prior shoulder procedure. Patients were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code for shoulder arthroplasty, shoulder stabilization, and rotator cuff repair and if they had an ensuing nerve release (cubital or carpal tunnel) within 2 years of shoulder surgery. Another cohort that underwent nerve release surgery for DMN with no prior history of shoulder surgery was identified and subsequently matched to the first cohort by a 3:1 (control:case) ratio. Patients were included if they were over the age of 18 years. Chart reviews and surveys stored using REDCap were used to collect demographics, surgical history, EMG/nerve conduction velocity results, postoperative symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes with a minimum 2-year follow-up. In total, 120 patients were included in this analysis (28 cases, 92 controls). The most common nerve release for DMN across both cohorts was open carpal tunnel release. Following nerve release, the case group had more postoperative persistent numbness/tingling than the control group. Both groups were similar with regard to postoperative pain, weakness, or patient-reported outcome measures. Residual postoperative numbness following nerve release was more likely to occur in the forearm for the case group than the control group. Patients with a history of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and reverse total shoulder replacement shoulder surgery before the presentation of DMN are more likely to experience persistent numbness or tingling after nerve release surgery as well as experience symptoms in the forearm than those without prior shoulder surgery. Symptom prevalence retrospective study III.

Factors contributing to persistent shoulder pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Protocol for a scoping review

Introduction Rotator cuff (RC) tears are the most common and disabling musculoskeletal ailments among patients with shoulder pain. Although most individuals show improvement in function and pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), a subgroup of patients continue to suffer from persistent shoulder pain following the surgical procedure. Identifying these factors is important in planning preoperative management to improve patient outcomes. Objective This scoping review aims to identify biological factors, psychological factors, and social determinants of health contributing to the development of persistent pain in individuals after the ARCR procedure. Inclusion criteria All prospective and retrospective longitudinal studies reporting the risk factors contributing to persistent pain three months or longer after the ARCR surgery will be considered for this scoping review. Methods Our review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review methodology. Four electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus will be searched for studies in the English language. Additional studies can be found by conducting a citation analysis of the included studies. Title and abstract screening will be performed by two independent reviewers following the inclusion criteria, a third reviewer will be consulted about any differences. Next, full-text screening will be conducted, and the remaining search results will be reviewed to extract data, as well as to synthesize findings from all research. An overview of findings will be depicted in tabular format accompanied with a narrative summary of various factors contributing to persistent pain.

Early Postoperative Pain is Similar after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair versus Short-Stay Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

IntroductionOne of the barriers to counseling patients for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is the anticipated pain after surgery. This can be contrasted with the common perception of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery being less painful due to the less invasive nature of the procedure. We conducted a prospective study comparing postoperative pain levels and narcotic consumption after SA compared to those after RCR. MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 102 patients undergoing short-stay SA and RCR at a single hospital. 50 patients underwent RCR and 52 underwent SA. All participants received a multimodal pain regimen consisting of an interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine and one of two oral pain medication regimens. Patients were provided a daily pain diary to be completed for 14 postoperative days that tracked pain levels, narcotic consumption, and pain location. Patients were excluded for age <40, revision surgery, SA for fracture, history of chronic opioid use, or an inability to adhere to study protocol. Demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and pain sensitivity questionnaires (PSQ) were collected preoperatively. Primary study outcomes were daily VAS pain scores and narcotic consumption during the 14 days after surgery. ResultsRCR patients were younger (60.6 vs. 68.9 years; p<0.01) but other demographics, preoperative pain, and PSQ scores were similar between groups. Peak mean VAS pain levels for RCR and SA each occurred on postoperative (POD) 2 and were 4.4 ± 3.1 and 5.1 ± 2.7 respectively (p=0.214). There was no significant difference in VAS pain during the 14-day postoperative period between RCR and SA patients (p>0.05) or between anatomic SA and reverse SA (p>0.05). Narcotic usage was greater for RCR patients at POD 7 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.039) and 8 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.015) compared to SA patients. ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that postoperative pain levels do not significantly differ between RCR and short-stay SA, with greater narcotic usage observed for RCR at one week after surgery. These findings support the notion that despite the increased invasiveness of SA, early postoperative pain is comparable with early pain after RCR.

Poster 146: Higher Reoperation Rates Following Primary Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Screening Positive for Depression

Objectives: Recent studies have identified an association between preoperative depression and worse outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery, including lower patient-reported outcomes, increased pain and impairment, and higher rates of complications. Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) is a commonly administered screening tool for measuring depressive symptoms; however, the relationship between PHQ-2 and postoperative outcomes after RCR is not yet established. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between depression and reoperation rates in patients undergoing primary RCR. Methods: This retrospective chart review evaluated data from all patients who underwent elective primary RCR at 1 health system between March 2016 and December 2021 and had a PHQ-2 score at least 6 months prior to their surgery. The PHQ-2 is a validated tool used to screen for depression with scores ranging from 0-6. Patients were categorized as either depressed (PHQ-2 ≥ 2) or nondepressed (PHQ-2 &lt; 2). Patients &lt;18 years old, history of prior RCR, and patients without PHQ-2 scores within 6 months of surgery were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was to compare reoperation rate, defined as the need for any subsequent surgery related to the primary RCR between depressed and non-depressed patients. The secondary outcome was a comparison of postoperative health care utilization, which included emergency department visits and hospital readmissions within 90 days. Depressed patients were also propensity matched 1:1 to nondepressed patients via age, body mass index (BMI), and tear size for a subanalysis. Results: A total of 238 patients who underwent primary RCR were included with 84 depressed patients and 154 nondepressed patients. Significantly more patients were female (67% versus 46%; P = 0.002) in the depressed cohort compared to nondepressed. There was a significantly increased incidence of comorbid depression (63% vs 28%; P &lt; 0.001), anxiety (52% vs 17%; P &lt; 0.001), and substance use disorder (20% vs 6%; P &lt; 0.001) as well as a lower median household income (MHI) in the depressed cohort versus the nondepressed cohort ($58,451.93 ± $21,024.93 vs. $66,751.93 ± $22,654.45; P &lt; 0.001). Fifteen (17.9%) depressed patients underwent reoperation versus 10 (6.5%) nondepressed patients (P = 0.006). Mean time to reoperation in the depressed cohort was 11.7 months (0.8-35 months). In the subanalysis, 80 patients in the depressed cohort and 80 patients in the nondepressed cohort were matched. Depressed patients had significantly higher rates of comorbid depression (63% vs 18%; P &lt; 0.001), anxiety (52% vs 17%; P &lt; 0.001), and substance use disorder (20% vs 6%; P &lt; 0.001) and a lower MHI ($58,615.20 ± $21,455.12 vs $66,470.73 ± $22,996.49; P = 0.04). Fewer patients were employed full time (22% vs. 44%) and more were disabled (30% vs 8%) amongst the depressed cohort (P = 0.003). Amongst depressed patients, 14 patients (17.5%) versus 4 (5%) underwent reoperation (P = 0.01). No significant differences in postoperative emergency department visits, postoperative complications, or hospital readmissions were found between the depressed and nondepressed cohorts in either analysis. Conclusions: We found patients screening positive for depression preoperatively, as measured by PHQ-2, had a significantly higher reoperation rate following primary RCR compared to nondepressed patients. These patients were more likely to be female, have comorbid mental health diagnoses, no full-time employment, and a lower household income. Screening for depression preoperatively could be a useful adjunct for providers to better identify patients at risk for worse outcomes.

Clinical application of tranexamic acid in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

To investigate whether intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improves operative blood loss, postoperative fibrinolytic index, inflammatory response, and postoperative pain. This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study. From January 2023 to February 2024, 64 patients who required arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included and divided into tranexamic acid group (T group) group and control group (C group) according to the random number table method. In T group, 1000 mg TXA was administered intravenously 10 minutes before surgery, and an equivalent dose of normal saline was administered intravenously 10 minutes before surgery in C group. Intraoperative bleeding, postoperative fibrinolytic indexes, inflammatory indexes, pain scores, and occurrence of adverse effects were compared between the 2 groups. Intraoperative bleeding in T group was lower than that in C group (P < .05); D-D and FDP in T group were significantly lower than those in C group (P < .05); postoperative TNF-α and IL-6 in 2 groups was higher than that before operation and T group was lower than C group (P < .05); The pain scores of the 2 groups after operation were lower than those before operation (P < .05), and there was no difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). TXA is able to reduce blood loss and inflammatory reactions, modulate fibrinolytic function, and promote postoperative recovery in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, with no elevated risk of complications.

Functional Outcomes of Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery: Retrospective, Observational Study

This study aimed to investigate the functional outcomes of Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair compared to Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. The study included 20 patients, with an average age of 55 years, who underwent either open or arthroscopic rotator-cuff repair surgery. Our data showed that most patients started going back to work and engaging in regular daily activities three months after surgery. In both groups, the patients' range of motion (ROM) was 100% after three months. The CMS score responses increased after 6 months, and similarly, at 12 months, the CMS scores indicate good or excellent outcomes for both groups. Majority of the factors showed statistically insignificant p-values. However, the median ASES score increased as the follow-up months increased in both groups, with significant P-values (0.057, 0.016, and 0.016) for the scores at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Complication rates and efficacy of single-injection vs. continuous interscalene nerve block: a prospective evaluation following arthroscopic primary rotator cuff repair without a concomitant open procedure

To compare the complications and efficacy of pain relief of the interscalene anesthetic block using either a single-injection (SI) vs. a continuous, indwelling catheter (CIC) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Patients undergoing primary, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without concomitant open procedure or biceps tenodesis were prospectively enrolled by 4 fellowship-trained sports medicine and shoulder surgeons. Patients received either a SI or CIC preoperatively based on surgeon preference. Patients were contacted by phone to complete a standard questionnaire on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Patients were asked to rate the efficacy of their subjective pain relief (scale of 0-10), document issues with the catheter, describe analgesic usage, and report pharmacological and medical complications. The primary outcome was measured as complication rate. Postoperative narcotic use, patient satisfaction, and visual analog scale pain scores were measured as secondary outcomes. Seventy patients were enrolled, 33 CIC patients (13 male, 20 female, mean age 61±8 years) and 37 SI patients (20 male, 17 female, mean age 59±10 years). There were significantly more injection/insertion site complications in the CIC group (48%) vs. the SI group (11%, P=.001). The incidence of motor weakness was higher in the CIC group on POD 1 (P=.034), but not at any subsequent time points. On POD 1, CIC patients had a clinically significantly lower pain score compared to SI (3.2 vs. 5.4; P=.020). Similar scores were observed at subsequent time points until POD 28, when CIC again had a lower pain score (0.8 vs. 2.7; P=.005). However, this did not reach clinical significance. All patients in both groups rated a satisfaction of 9 or 10 (scale 0-10) with the anesthesia provided by their nerve block. CIC interscalene nerve blocks had an increased risk for injection site complications and minor complications in the immediate postoperative period when using the CIC for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without any concomitant open procedures. CIC blocks demonstrated clinically significant superior pain relief on POD 1 but were equal to SI blocks at every time point thereafter. Superior pain relief of CIC at POD 28 was not clinically significant. CIC catheters do not appear to markedly decrease the use of postoperative narcotics. Despite this trend in complication rates and pain scores, all patients in both groups were satisfied with their nerve block.

Influence of Pain Sensitivity on Surgical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) has been found to be a valid tool, and PSQ scores have been shown to be predictive of outcomes after surgery for lumbar stenosis. The effect of pain sensitivity on outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery has not been examined. Hypothesis: PSQ scores would be associated with surgical outcomes after arthroscopic RCR surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients 18 to 80 years old scheduled for RCR were consecutively enrolled. Patients with glenohumeral arthritis grade ≥2 or RCR revision surgery were excluded. PSQ was completed preoperatively. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were used as patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), and visual analog scale pain score was documented as well. Active shoulder external rotation (ER), internal rotation, and anterior forward elevation range of motion (ROM) were recorded. PROMs and ROM measurements were recorded preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Rotator cuff tear size, type of repair, and concomitant procedures were documented. Patients were classified as having high or normal pain sensitivity based on PSQ scores. Results: Of 100 enrolled patients, 38 patients were classified as having high pain sensitivity. Patients with high pain sensitivity had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively (P < .01). From the preoperative assessment to 3 months postoperatively, PROMs improved more in patients with high versus normal pain sensitivity. However, for patients with high pain sensitivity, PROMs plateaued after 3 months but continued to improve for patients with normal pain sensitivity (P < .01). Visual analog scale pain scores were higher at all time points for patients with high pain sensitivity (P < .05). Preoperatively, patients with high pain sensitivity had restricted active ROM compared with patients who had normal pain sensitivity for anterior forward elevation, ER, and internal rotation (P = .009, P = .012, and P = .006, respectively). By 1 year after surgery, ER ROM was still restricted in patients with high pain sensitivity. Conclusion: Pain sensitivity is an important factor influencing RCR outcomes. Patients with high pain sensitivity undergoing RCR showed less improvement in active ROM and worse PROMs after surgery compared with patients who had normal pain sensitivity. Preoperative PSQ may predict postoperative improvements.

Increased patient resilience scores are related to positive postoperative outcomes in rotator cuff repairs

We sought to determine whether patients' preoperative resilience scores predict postoperative outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent data collection preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Data collected included demographic characteristics and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) score, visual analog scale score, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey scores (mental component [VR-12M] and physical component [VR-12P]), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score. In total, 131 patients had complete 1- or 2-year postoperative outcome measures. Female patients comprised 56.5% of our sample, and the average age was 57.6 years. Between the low, normal, and high resilience groups, there were significant differences in the VR-12M scores at 0, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (P<.01 for all). The VR-12P scores at 12 months were 44.2, 47.4, and 49.8 in the low, normal, and high resilience groups, respectively, showing a trend upward, but this failed to reach the level of significance (P=.08). The SST scores of the low, normal, and high resilience groups at 12 months were 69.1, 79.9, and 85.1, respectively, again showing a trend upward, but this failed to reach the level of significance (P=.07). The SST scores at 0 and 24 months did not differ between groups. There were no significant differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores at 0, 12, or 24 months postoperatively. We found a significant positive correlation between the BRS score and SST score at 12 months (R=0.18), VR-12M score at 12 months (R=0.38), VR-12M score at 24 months (R=0.31), and VR-12P score at 12 months (R=0.21). Our study provides evidence that BRS scores in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are related to postoperative outcomes, measured through the VR-12M and SST scores at 2-year follow-up.

Comparison of Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair between Elderly and Younger Patient Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) surgery between younger and older patients. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing outcomes between patients older than 65 to 70 years and a younger group following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and other sources for relevant studies up to 13 September 2022, and then assessed the quality of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). We used random-effects meta-analysis for data synthesis. The primary outcomes were pain and shoulder functions, while secondary outcomes included re-tear rate, shoulder range of motion (ROM), abduction muscle power, quality of life, and complications. Five non-randomized controlled trials, with 671 participants (197 older and 474 younger patients), were included. The quality of the studies was all fairly good, with NOS scores ≥ 7. The results showed no significant differences between the older and younger groups in terms of Constant score improvement, re-tear rate, or other outcomes such as pain level improvement, muscle power, and shoulder ROM. These findings suggest that ARCR surgery in older patients can achieve a non-inferior healing rate and shoulder function compared to younger patients.

Correlation between the morphological features of the biceps groove and injuries to the biceps pulley and the long head tendon of the biceps

PurposeThe morphometric features of the biceps groove were measured to investigate their correlation with the injury of the pulley and the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT).MethodsA total of 126 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery had their morphological features of bicipital groove evaluated on a 3D reconstruction model of the humeral head. The groove width, groove depth, opening angle, medial wall angle, and inclination angle of the bicipital groove were measured for each patient. During the surgery, the type of injury to the biceps pulley and the degree of long head of biceps tendon injury were assessed. The correlations of these injury assessments with bicipital groove measurements were analyzed.ResultsThe average groove width was(12.3 ± 2.1) mm. The average groove depth was(4.9 ± 1.4) mm. The average groove inclination angle was 26.3° ± 8.1°. The average opening angle was 89.8° ± 18.4°. The average medial groove wall angle was 40.6° ± 7.9°.Sixty six patients had injury of the biceps pulley structure, and their Martetschläger classifications were as follows: type I injury in 12 patients, type II injury in 18 patients, and type III injury in 36 patients. The Lafosse grades of Lesions of LHBT were as follows: 72 cases were grade 0 injury, 30 cases were grade I injury, and 24 cases were grade II injury. We found no significant correlation between the opening width, depth, inclination angle, opening angle, and medial wall angle of the morphological features of bicipital groove and injuries of the pulley and the LHBT. The correlation between pulley structure injury and lesions of LHBT was statistically significant.ConclusionLesions of LHBT show strong correlation with pulley injuries.This study does not find a correlation between the injury of the pulley or the LHBT and bicipital groove morphology.

Impact of intra-articular injection with tranexamic acid on total blood loss and postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.

To evaluate the impact of intra-articular injection with tranexamic acid (TXA) on total blood loss (TBL) and postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study retrospectively included patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent shoulder ARCR surgery in Taizhou hospital, China, between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients received 10 ml (100 mg/ml) of intra-articular TXA injection (TXA group) or 10 ml of normal saline (non-TXA group) after the incision was sutured. The primary variable was the type of drug injected into the shoulder joint at the end of the operation. The primary outcome were perioperative TBL and postoperative pain [measured by visual analog scale (VAS)]. The secondary outcomes were differences in red blood cell count, hemoglobin count, hematocrit, platelet count. A total of 162 patients were included, 83 patients in TXA group and 79 patients in non-TXA group. Notably, patients in TXA group were more likely to have lower TBL volume [261.21 (175.13-506.67) ml vs. 382.41 (236.11-593.31), P = 0.025], and postoperative VAS score ≤ 2 within 24 h (P = 0.031) compared with those in non-TXA group. In addition, the median hemoglobin count difference was significantly lower in TXA group than that of in non-TXA group (P = 0.045), while, the differences in median counts of red blood cell, hematocrit, and platelet between the two groups were comparable (all P > 0.05). Intra-articular injection of TXA might reduce the TBL and degree of postoperative pain within 24 h after shoulder arthroscopy.

The Effect of the Overweight Condition on Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Outcomes.

This study sought to investigate the influence of a preexisting overweight condition (body mass index [BMI], 25-29.9 kg/m2) on functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. A retrospective review was performed examining the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a normal-weight (BMI, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and an overweight (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m2) population. Functional outcomes were assessed to include the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, as well as range of motion in forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation. A total of 52 normal-weight patients (mean BMI, 23.7±2.1 kg/m2) and 57 overweight patients (mean BMI, 28.4±1.4 kg/m2) were included. Both groups demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements in VAS score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and ASES score at final follow-up (P<.0001), with no difference in range of motion (P>.05). Overall, when comparing outcomes between the groups, there were significantly better outcomes in the normal-weight group's VAS scores (mean, 0.56±0.96 vs 1.3±1.7; P=.0064), ASES scores (mean, 96.1±5.8 vs 92.4±9.7; P=.0187), and internal rotation (mean thoracic vertebrae, 9.2±3.0 vs 10.4±2.6; P=.0289). However, these differences did not reach clinical significance regarding the threshold of patients meeting standard minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient-acceptable symptomatic state for rotator cuff repairs. Over-weight patients have improved outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery with noninferior clinical results when compared with normal-weight patients. More data regarding outcomes of overweight patients will help physicians make better-informed decisions when considering rotator cuff repair. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):242-249.].

Relationship between hematoma-like tissue on the footprint and structural outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a transosseous technique

We have tried to create hematoma over the footprint site at the end of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) surgery, expecting to apply biochemical effects of the platelet-related factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the presence of hematoma-like tissue (HLT) on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and to evaluate the relationship between the HLT and the structural outcomes of ARCR. Twenty-five patients were reviewed with a mean age at surgery of 69.8 years (range, 52-85 years). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 1 week, 6-8 weeks, and >6 months postoperatively. Structural outcomes for the repaired cuff and thickness of HLT were evaluated on coronal T2-weighted images. Signal intensity of HLT was evaluated on coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed images as the ratio compared to supraspinatus tendon intensity (HLT/SSP ratio). Structural outcomes showed Sugaya type 1 in 12 shoulders, type 2 in 4, and type 3 in 9. HLT thickness was significantly thicker at 1 week and 6-8 weeks postoperatively in Sugaya type 1 patients than in type 3 patients (1 week; P=.014, 6-8 weeks; P<.001). HLT/SSP ratio gradually decreased (at 1 week; 1.9±0.7, 6-8 weeks; 1.6±0.6, >6 months; 1.2±0.5), and differed significantly between >6 months and both 1 week and 6-8 weeks (P<.001 each).

Regional nerve blocks for relieving postoperative pain in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Rotator cuff tear is the most common cause of shoulder pain in middle-age and older people. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is the most common treatment method for rotator cuff tear. Early postoperative pain after ARCR is the primary concern for surgeons and patients and can affect postoperative rehabilitation, satisfaction, recovery, and hospital day. There are numerous methods for controlling postoperative pain including patient-controlled analgesia, opioid, interscalene block, and local anesthesia. Regional blocks including interscalene nerve block, suprascapular nerve block, and axillary nerve block have been successfully and commonly used. There is no difference between interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in pain control and opioid consumption. However, SSNB has fewer complications and can be more easily applied than ISB. Combination of axillary nerve block with SSNB has a stronger analgesic effect than SSNB alone. These regional blocks can be helpful for postoperative pain control within 48 hours after ARCR surgery.

Human Dermal Allograft Patch Augmentation of Degenerate Rotator Cuff Tendon Using a Single Lateral-Row Technique

The role of biological augmentation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery has increased over the years. It has shown favorable healing rates and functional outcomes. Patch augmentation is commonly applied in repairs of massively retracted cuff tears, full-thickness tears, revision repair, or open cuff surgery. There is a paucity of literature on the use of patch augmentation when dealing with a chronic degenerate tendon associated with small-sized cuff tears. In recent years, the resorbable bioinductive bovine collagen implant has gained popularity for its application in partial-thickness tears via an isolated bioinductive repair fashion, without traditional rotator cuff repair. These bioinductive implants, albeit promising in their biological properties for tendon repair, lack structural strength and do not confer similar biomechanical advantages as human dermal allograft. We share our surgical technique for an arthroscopic patch augmentation involving human dermal allograft, using a single-lateral row surgical fixation, to address a degenerate cuff tendon with small-sized rotator cuff tear. We believe that our use of a human dermal patch augmentation conferred increased biomechanical advantage and reduced costs while delivering favorable outcomes for patients in our value-driven care.

Minimum 15-year follow-up for clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery is one of the most common shoulder procedures performed in the United States. Although several studies have shown considerable symptomatic relief in the short term following surgery, a relatively high rate of recurrent defects has led surgeons to question the long-term durability of this operation. We hypothesized that outcomes at a minimum of 15 years of follow-up in patients who underwent all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair would be maintained and would remain significantly improved compared with the preoperative status. All-arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed in 193 patients from 2003 to 2005. Patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 1, 2, 5, and ≥15 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Secondary outcomes included Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS), visual analog scale, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Upper Extremity (UE) scores. Patient demographic characteristics, revision surgical procedures, and complications were recorded. Generalized estimating equations were used to model scores over time, and multiple comparisons between time points were performed using Tukey adjustment. This study included 60 patients with a mean follow-up period of 16.5 years (range, 15.8-17.7 years). The mean ASES score improved from 60.2±18.8 preoperatively to 93.0±9.4 at ≥15 years (P<.0001). The mean visual analog scale pain score decreased from 4.1±0.7 preoperatively to 0.7±0.3 at ≥15 years (P<.0001). The average SANE, SAS, and PROMIS-UE scores at ≥15 years were 87.8±14.8, 8.8±4.3, and 49.6±10.2, respectively. Of 60 patients, 7 underwent revision surgery. Older age and female sex were associated with lower SAS scores at 15 years, whereas female sex was associated with lower PROMIS-UE scores. There were no factors predictive of ASES or SANE scores. At long-term follow-up (≥15 years), the patient-reported outcomes of all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair show significant improvement from baseline preoperative function and remain durable over a period of 15 years. This information is useful in counseling patients regarding the long-term results of this procedure.

Suprascapular nerve release does not provide additional benefits in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To investigate the effect of suprascapular nerve release in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. This systematic review was performed to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compared the outcomes of patients who did and did not receive suprascapular nerve release (SSNR) during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for cohort study assessment. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (version 1.0) was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. The primary outcomes were pain and shoulder function. The secondary outcome was the re-tear rate. Two RCTs and three non-RCTs with a total of 187 patients (90 patients received SSNR and 97 patients did not receive SSNR) were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed that the SSNR group did not had a more pain reduction, assessed by visual analogue scale, compared to the non-SSNR group. Also, the SSNR group did not have a significantly more improvement in the UCLA score, compared to the non-SSNR group. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of Constant score and re-tear rate. The result of this study showed that additional suprascapular nerve release did not provide additional benefit in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Routine arthroscopic SSNR is not recommended when treating patients with rotator cuff tear. Level III.

Analysis of the reasons why patients cancel shoulder surgery despite recommendation.

BackgroundTo determine the reasons and factors that contribute to the cancellations of shoulder surgeries at a tertiary referral center and to analyze the characteristics of these patients.MethodsPatients scheduled for shoulder surgery from June 2017 to July 2019 were allocated to a surgery group (n=224) or a cancellation group (n=96). These groups were compared with respect to patient characteristics, types of surgery, distance from patient’s home to the hospital, traveling time to the hospital, and waiting period before surgery. Reasons for cancellation and responses were acquired using a telephone interview and were subsequently analyzed.ResultsThe cancellation group was older, had a less frequent history of trauma, and had a lower proportion of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair than the surgery group (p=0.009, p=0.014, and p=0.017, respectively). In addition, mean distance from the patients’ homes to the hospital and preoperative waiting time were both longer in the cancellation group (p=0.001 and p<0.01, respectively). The most common reason given for cancellation was another medical condition (28.1%).ConclusionsOlder age, need for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery, longer distance from the patient’s home to the hospital, and longer waiting period significantly increased the chance of cancellation. The main reason for canceling surgery was a concurrent medical condition. Therefore, identification of other medical conditions in advance is an important consideration when surgeons recommend shoulder surgery to patients. Surgeons should also consider patient's age, type of surgery, distance from the hospital, and waiting time when assessing the possibility of surgery cancellation.

Obesity negatively affects outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at four-year follow-up.

The purpose is to evaluate the influence of obesity (BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2) on surgical outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. A retrospective review was performed examining the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in both a normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2) and an obese (BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2) patient population, specifically looking at functional outcomes and range of motion. Secondary variables analyzed were surgical time, complications, and medical comorbidities. 52 normal weight patients (mean BMI 23.7 ± 2.1) and 59 obese patients (mean BMI 34.0 ± 2.4) were included. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in VAS, SANE and ASES scores (P < 0.0001), however there were significantly better outcomes in the normal weight group in VAS (0.56 ± 0.96 vs 1.42 ± 2.22; P = 0.0108), ASES (96.1 ± 5.8 vs 90.6 ± 15.6; P = 0.0192), and internal rotation (9.2 ± 3.0 vs 10.9 ± 2.3; P = 0.0010). Additionally, the obese cohort had more complications, longer surgical times, and a greater comorbid background. Obesity is associated with significantly more comorbid conditions, surgical complications, longer surgical time, and worse patient reported outcomes than normal weight patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.