Arthroscopic Knot Research Articles

Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis With Interference Screw Fixation: A Technique Video

Background: Management of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology is accomplished through a biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. While both modalities provide beneficial outcomes, a biceps tenodesis may confer improved cosmesis, functional outcomes, and decreased muscle cramping postoperatively. Many procedural considerations are undertaken prior to a tenodesis, such as the surgical approach and fixation device. While similar clinical outcomes are achieved between an open subpectoral and arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (ASPBT) with interference screw (IS) fixation, the latter technique offers a minimally invasive modality. Indications: The primary indications for an ASPBT include superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears, LHBT tears, biceps instability, bicipital tunnel disease, biceps pulley lesions, and biceps tenosynovitis. Contraindications to the arthroscopic approach include a distal lesion of the biceps tendon below the pectoralis major tendon (PMT). The IS may be used to create a biomechanically stiffer construct. Technique Description: With the arthroscope in the lateral portal, the distal aspect of the bicipital groove proximal to the superior border of the PMT is identified and opened. The LHBT is subsequently mobilized and released. An anterosuperolateral portal is localized with a spinal needle positioned perpendicular to the bicipital tunnel, 1.5 cm proximal to the superior border of the PMT. The biceps is then removed ex vivo and whip-stitches are sewn beginning 1 cm proximal to the myotendinous junction of the LHBT. After firmly associating the LHBT with the tip of the IS, a guidewire is placed 1.5 cm superior to the superior border of the PMT, perpendicular to the humerus, and a reamer is used to prepare a 6-, 7-, or 8-mm diameter socket. The tendon is inserted through the accessory portal into the tunnel, followed by screw fixation. Suture tails are tied with 5 alternating half hitches, each secured via an arthroscopic knot pusher. Results: ASPBT with IS fixation provides significant pain relief, improves range of motion (ROM), and enhances quality of life. Discussion: ASPBT with IS fixation provides significant improvements in patient-reported and functional outcomes and thus can be an acceptable treatment for LHBT pathology. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic Repair of a Lateral Meniscus Oblique Radial Tear

Background: Lateral meniscal oblique radial tears (LMORTs) are the most common type of lateral meniscal tears and occur concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in up to 12% of cases. Four types of LMORTs have been classified in the literature based on proximity to the meniscal root and extent of the tear. Type 1 and 2 LMORTs represent partial and complete posterior root tears less than 10 mm from the root insertion. Type 3 and 4 LMORTs are partial and complete posterior radial meniscus tears greater than 10 mm from the root insertion. Indications: Type 3 and 4 LMORTs can and should be addressed with an all-inside side-to-side repair at the time of ACL reconstruction. LMORTs that are not repaired at the time of ACL reconstruction can contribute to persistent instability and meniscal extrusion. Technique Description: Diagnostic arthroscopy is performed to evaluate the posterior aspects of both the medial and lateral meniscus. The medial leaflet is commonly flipped into the notch and scarred to ACL remnant. After identifying and isolating the medial leaflet, an arthroscopic suture passer is used to pass a suture from inferior to superior through the medial leaflet. A second suture is passed from inferior to superior through the lateral leaflet. This is used to shuttle the suture pass through the medial leaflet to the bottom of the meniscus, where it can be tied in a horizontal mattress fashion. The sutures are tied down with aide of an arthroscopic knot pusher. A second set of sutures is passed and used to shuttle a second suture that would be tied posterior to the first suture, again in a horizontal mattress fashion. This allows reduction of the fragments in apposition across the tear. Postoperatively, patients are allowed range of motion from 0° to 90° and to toe touch weightbearing for the first 4 weeks. Patients are advanced to weightbearing as tolerated at 5 weeks. Typical return to sport ranges from 6 to 9 months postoperatively. Results: Results have been published for 2-year outcomes of type 3 and 4 LMORT repairs and have demonstrated persistent improved patient-reported outcomes as well as healing rates that are greater than 80% and in some series approach nearly 100%. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic all-inside side-to-side surgical repair is a durable and reliable treatment option for patients presenting for ACL reconstruction with concomitant type 3 or 4 LMORT. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft and Concomitant Meniscal Ramp Repair

Background: Quadriceps autograft, though well established for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, is underutilized in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction largely due to slow adoption. All-inside meniscal ramp repair and quadriceps tendon autograft PCL reconstruction have been described in isolation, but not concomitantly in a video journal. Indications: PCL reconstruction is indicated in grade 3 isolated tears with instability that have not improved with nonoperative management and in instances with associated injuries such as meniscal ramp tears, as observed in this 18-year-old division I football player. Graft selection is dependent upon surgeon and patient preference, with quadriceps autograft delivering a viable option with desirable long-term outcomes. Technique Description: A partial-thickness quadriceps tendon autograft was harvested, the remnant PCL stump was debrided, and a reamer was used to drill the all-inside tibial tunnel for traction suture passage. An accessory low anterolateral portal was utilized to drill the femoral tunnel for passage of the femoral traction stitch. Traction sutures were withdrawn, and the graft was passed into the tibia, docked into the femur, fixated with an interference screw, and tensioned over the tibial button. A medial meniscal ramp tear was also identified and repaired in all-inside fashion with a 90° SutureLasso, polydioxanone suture (PDS), and suturetape via standard arthroscopic knot tying. Following the procedure, the patient began a PCL reconstruction rehabilitation protocol with a PCL rebound brace. Due to the meniscal ramp repair, toe touch weightbearing with the knee in extension during ambulation was completed for 6 weeks. Physical therapy (PT) focused on early quadriceps and patellar mobilization as well as active-assisted range of motion exercises. Results: At 6 months postoperation, the patient continued to progress in PT without major concerns. A full recovery and return to sport are expected approximately 9 to 12 months after surgery, as is consistent with the standard protocol. Discussion/Conclusion: This study describes the treatment of chronic PCL with concomitant meniscal ramp tear in a division I athlete. Further adoption of PCL reconstruction utilizing quadriceps autograft, even in the context of concomitant ligamentous or meniscal reconstruction, such as medial meniscal ramp repair, will aid in the widespread treatment of PCL injuries. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Socket-Anchor Technique for 3-Portal All-Inside Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Reconstruction Using Allograft Tendon

Arthroscopic techniques for anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) reconstruction have been developed in recent years. Allograft tendons are often used in ATFL reconstruction, and surgical indications include an insufficiently strong ligament remnant, high-demand activities, repeated ankle sprains, and revision cases. We describe a socket-anchor technique for talar tunnel creation: A 10-mm-deep bone tunnel (socket) is created along a previously located guidewire at the ATFL talar footprint; an absorbable suture anchor is inserted into the end of the socket; and the graft is tied to the suture, pulled into the socket, and finally, secured using an arthroscopic knot pusher. This technique provides the advantages of being minimally invasive, ensuring a sufficient tendon-bone interface healing area of the graft, avoiding medial neurovascular bundle injury and the risk of talar neck fracture caused by screw fixation, and having no special restrictions on the direction of the anchor with blind tunnel creation. In addition, the procedure is easy to perform with high fault tolerance and no need for intraoperative fluoroscopy.

Biomechanical Comparison of 1.2-mm Suture Tape, 2.0-mm Suture Tape, and 0.5-mm Suture Using Various Arthroscopic Knot Techniques.

The biomechanical properties of the 1.2-mm suture tape have outperformed conventional sutures in previous studies. To compare the loop and knot security of 2 tape-type and 1 cord-type sutures using different arthroscopic knot techniques. Controlled laboratory study. The biomechanical characteristics of the 1.2-mm tape, 2.0-mm tape, and 0.5-mm No. 2 suture were compared using 4 different knot types: 2 sliding knots (Samsung Medical Center [SMC] and Tennessee) and 2 nonsliding knots (2-throw surgeon's and 2-throw square) with 2 and 3 additional reverse half-hitches on alternating posts (RHAPs) in a closed-loop system on a materials testing device. Each configuration was tested for loop security (maximal load applied between 0 and 3 mm of displacement), knot security (ultimate failure load), and failure mode with cyclical loading (30 N load for 20 cycles at 1 cycle per sec until failure). Loop and knot security among the configurations were compared using an analysis of variance. With 2 RHAPs, the 2.0-mm tape showed significantly greater loop security than the 1.2-mm tape and suture (P = .001). With 3 RHAPs, the loop security of the suture was significantly superior compared with the 1.2-mm tape (P = .010). Regarding knot security, with 2 RHAPs, the 2.0-mm tape was significantly better than the 1.2-mm tape and suture (P < .001), while with 3 RHAPs, the suture was significantly superior to the 1.2-mm tape (P = .012). Using a square knot with 2 RHAPs, the 2.0-mm tape had significantly greater loop security (P = .001) and better knot security (P = .001) to the 1.2-mm tape and suture. Using the Tennessee knot with 2 RHAPs, the 1.2-mm tape had less loop security (P = .011) and knot security (P = .005) than the suture. Using the SMC knot with 3 RHAPs, the 2.0-mm tape and suture were significantly superior in loop security (P = .001) and knot security (P < .001) to the 1.2-mm tape. There was no significant difference in the failure mode between tapes and sutures with 2 and 3 RHAPs. With 2 RHAPs, the 2.0-mm tape demonstrated greater resistance to suture loop displacement and better knot security compared with the 1.2-mm tape and suture. However, with 3 RHAPs, the 1.2-mm tape manifested weaker loop and knot security compared with the suture.

Horizontal Cleavage Meniscus Tear Repaired Using a Cerclage Technique

Background: Horizontal meniscal cleavage tears often occur in older individuals and have a degenerative component. Commonly, these are managed with partial meniscectomy. However, this results in significantly decreased contact area and increased peek contact forces. Arthroscopic repair has shown comparable results with repairs of other tear types. Indications: Cerclage repair is performed for a horizontal cleavage tear in individuals without significant arthritis and in whom partial meniscectomy would remove an unacceptably large portion of meniscal tissue. Technique Description: Using standard arthroscopy portals, a self-retrieving suture passing device is used to pass a #0 high-strength suture through the periphery of the meniscus. Arthroscopic knots are tied on the superior surface of the meniscus and pushed as far posteriorly as possible. A small 1-cm incision is made just through skin on the proximal, posteromedial border of the tibia. Through this a spinal needle is placed percutaneously to pass a Chia into the joint just posterior to the knot. A curved spinal needle from an outside-in meniscal repair kit may be used as this provides a better trajectory to tears closer to the root attachment. The Chia and suture limbs are retrieved out the front of the knee, and then the suture tails are shuttled out the back of the knee. This is repeated until the repair is complete. The suture limbs are then cut below skin. Results: After arthroscopic all-inside repair of horizontal cleavage tears, patients do well. Outcomes are similar to repairs of other meniscal tear types. In all, 80% of patients are satisfied with their results, and there is an 11% to 12% failure rate which is comparable to other types of tear repairs. Discussion: All-inside cerclage repair should be considered for individuals sustaining a horizontal cleavage tear. This preserves meniscal tissue compared to partial meniscectomy and yields good healing rates and outcomes. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

X-Grab: An Arthroscopic Maneuver to Efficiently and Accurately Track the Post for Knot Tying

Numerous studies have analyzed techniques for producing reliable and efficient arthroscopic knots. All aspects have been explored, from the biomechanics and strength to the ability to teach and replicate at all levels of training. This technique article describes an additional maneuver (X-grab) for efficiently marking the post side of the arthroscopic knot without having to do this separately outside of the joint. This is most useful for procedures such as rotator cuff repair and capsular repair or plication in hip arthroscopy in which the location of the knot (i.e., the post) is critical. The aim of this Technical Note is to describe the X-grab maneuver, which shortens this process to a single step, limiting the see-sawing of sutures and over-instrumentation of the joint seen with other techniques.

Arthroscopic Hip Labral Reconstruction: Treatment of Irreparable Labral Tears With Segmental Allograft Reconstruction

Background: At the time of hip arthroscopy, some patients are found to have irreparable labral tears that are not amenable to primary repair. For these patients, treatment with segmental reconstruction is a surgical option to restore labral tissue and biomechanics. Indications: Patients with segmental irreparable hip labral tears that are technically not amenable for primary labral repair should be considered for labral reconstruction with allograft. Technique Description: Standard hip arthroscopic portals are established. An interportal capsulotomy is performed, and acetabular rim trimming is performed to remove the pincer deformity. Visualized segmental labral defects are measured using a piece of suture to allow for measurement of a curved surface and 1.4-mm polyether ether ketone (PEEK) anchors are placed in anticipation of labral fixation. On the back table, the tibialis anterior allograft is prepared for labral reconstruction. We mark a central portion of the graft tissue based on the measured defect size. A 3-0 vicryl suture is used to place a running stitch from one end to the other of the marked portion of the allograft and the marked, prepared graft is sharply divided from the rest of the tissue. Stitches from the anterior and posterior anchors are passed through the graft using a free needle. The graft is then placed through the distal accessory anterolateral portal and positioned into place. The posterolateral and then medial-most anchors are secured and tied using arthroscopic knots, followed by sequential tying of the middle anchors. Any additional arthroscopic procedures, such as cam resection, are performed, and capsular/skin closure is performed using standard methods. Results: Published outcomes support reconstruction of the labrum using allograft, with 2 series consisting of a total of 141 segmental/circumferential reconstructions demonstrating similar outcome scores at 2 years of follow-up as compared to matched cases of primary labral repairs. Discussion/Conclusion: Hip segmental labral reconstruction with tibialis anterior allograft provides a viable surgical option for patients with labral defects precluding primary labral repair. The presented material demonstrates a readily employable technique as well as clear, step-by-step postoperative rehabilitation protocols, and satisfactory published short- and mid-term outcomes literature.

Knots Tied With High-Tensile Strength Tape Biomechanically Outperform Knots Tied With Round Suture.

Background:Tape-type suture material is well-accepted in arthroscopy surgery.Purpose:To compare the knot security of a high–tensile strength round suture and high–tensile strength tape with commonly used arthroscopic knots.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:We compared the performance of No. 2 braided nonabsorbable high-strength suture with that of 1.3-mm braided nonabsorbable high-strength tape. Five commonly used arthroscopic knots were investigated: the Roeder knot; the Western knot; the Samsung Medical Center (SMC) knot; the Tennessee knot; and a static surgeon’s knot. Seven knots were tied for each combination of knots and suture types. Knots were tied on a 30-mm circumferential metal post, and the suture loops were transferred to a materials testing machine. After preloading to 5 N, all specimens were loaded to failure. The clinical failure load, defined as the maximal force to failure at 3 mm of crosshead displacement, yield load, and stiffness, were recorded. A 2-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences between the groups.Results:Both suture type and knot type significantly affected the clinical failure load, yield load, and stiffness (P = .002). The high-strength tape resulted in a significantly greater clinical failure load than the high-strength suture in the case of the Roeder knot, Western knot, and SMC knot (P = .027, .005, and .016, respectively). When the high-strength round suture was used, the Roeder knot, Western knot, and SMC knot resulted in significantly smaller clinical failure loads compared with the Tennessee knot (P = .011, .003, and .035, respectively) and the static surgeon’s knot (P < .001 for all). When the high-strength tape was used, the Roeder knot, Western knot, and SMC knot resulted in significantly smaller clinical failure loads compared with the static surgeon’s knot (P = .001, .001, and .003, respectively).Conclusion:The results of this study indicated that arthroscopic knots tied using 1.3-mm high-strength tape biomechanically outperformed knots tied using a No. 2 high-strength suture. While the static surgeon’s knot exhibited the best biomechanical properties, the Tennessee knot resulted in generally better biomechanical properties among the arthroscopic sliding knots.Clinical Relevance:Elongation and loosening of tied knots possibly affects the clinical results of repaired constructs.

A new arthroscopic sliding locking knot: Banarji knot

Arthroscopic knot tying is a crucial component for a successful arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Knot tying should not be difficult to master or time consuming to perform. This study describes a new sliding locking knot for arthroscopic shoulder surgery and we named it Banarji knot, in the name of the author. It is a low profile, non-bulky, and double locking knot, which makes it a more secure knot.

Are Suture Tape Knots as Secure as Standard Suture? A Biomechanical Study.

Background:Few studies have investigated the biomechanical performance of flat-braided suture tapes versus round-braided sutures after being knotted.Purpose:To compare the loop security and knot strength of a standard round-braided suture with 3 commercially available flat-braided suture tapes using 2 types of arthroscopic knots.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:One standard suture (SS) and 3 suture tapes (T1, T2, and T3) were tied with the surgeon’s knot (SK) and the Tennessee slider (TS), 25 times each, by a single surgeon. Each combination of knots and sutures underwent a preload, cyclic loading, and load to failure. Outcomes were loop security (defined by loop stretch after a 5-N preload), load at clinical failure (3 mm of displacement), and load at ultimate failure (suture rupture or knot slippage). Two-way analysis of variance was used for analysis.Results:Overall, the SK group had greater overall loop security than that of the TS group (0.4 ± 0.3 vs 0.5 ± 0.3 mm of stretch, respectively; P = .020). The clinical failure load varied by suture type (P < .001) but not knot type (P = .106). For both knot types, the SS had the lowest mean ± SD clinical failure load (SK, 171 ± 49 N; TS, 176 ± 37 N), which was significantly less than that of T2 (247 ± 85 N; P < .001) and T3 (251 ± 96 N; P < .001) for the SK type and T2 (231 ± 67 N; P = .023) for the TS type. T2 sutures had the greatest ultimate failure load for both knot types (SK, 418 ± 45 N; TS, 461 ± 57 N), which was significantly greater than SS, T1, and T3 (P < .001 for all). The TS knot had greater overall ultimate failure load than the SK (375 ± 64 vs 350 ± 66 N; P < .001).Conclusion:Not all suture tape knots had the same biomechanical properties, although knot security and strength appeared to be adequate for all suture tapes as well as for SS. There was no evidence that suture tape knots are lower profile than SS knots.Clinical Relevance:Surgeons should not use suture tape based only on the assumption that it has superior biomechanical properties to a standard round-braided suture.

Mechanical Comparison of High-Strength Tape Suture Versus High-Strength Round Suture

PurposeTo compare knot and loop characteristics of commonly used high-strength tapes and high-strength round sutures.MethodsTwenty tied 30-mm loops were prepared for using suture-knot combinations of 4 common arthroscopic knots or a hand-tied surgeon’s knot and 7 sutures. Two tapes (BroadBand, SutureTape) and three no. 2 sutures (MaxBraid, FiberWire, DynaCord) were compared. Two additional larger tape sutures (FiberTape, PermaTape) not commonly tied arthroscopically were included in the hand-tied group. Each suture-knot combination was evaluated for loop integrity (single load to a specified elongation), knot security (plastic loop deformation with cyclic testing), loop security, and knot volume. Data were compared using analysis of variance followed by Tukey-Kramer post hoc tests.ResultsBroadBand and SutureTape demonstrated superior loop integrity compared to most no. 2 suture-knot combinations. FiberTape (430.48 ± 89.00 N) and PermaTape (545.16 ± 95.09 N) required significantly greater force to undergo 3 mm of displacement than all other hand-tied sutures (P < .001). All suture-knot configurations demonstrated significant plastic deformation (cyclic elongation) over 1000 cycles (P < 0.001). DynaCord displayed the best loop security except when paired with the Duncan loop. Overall, BroadBand and SutureTape had lower knot volumes compared to all other sutures.ConclusionThis study exhibits the ability of narrow tape sutures to provide reliable tissue apposition and fixation in multiple suture-knot configurations, while decreasing the potential adverse effects accompanying knot prominence. Generally, BroadBand and SutureTape demonstrated an ideal balance of mechanical characteristics to achieve the optimal suture-knot construct among those tested. Dynacord displayed superior loop security and performed best among round sutures. PermaTape and FiberTape showed greater loop integrity, albeit to the detriment of loop security and knot volume.Clinical RelevanceWhen securing a rotator cuff repair construct with a knot, one should have a basic understanding of the mechanical properties of the suture and knot being used to provide the best possible repair. This study will provide information about the mechanical characteristics of commonly used high-strength tape suture knots and loops to help determine what knot type may provide the best overall construct.

Mixed-Methods Analysis of a Validated Arthroscopic Knot-Tying Simulator With New Indirect Visualization Condition.

Background:Simulation provides low-risk opportunities for surgical trainees to learn and practice fundamental skills. One simulation tool for orthopaedics is the Arthroscopic Knot (ArK) Trainer, which has been validated as an effective simulation tool across multiple methodologies. Previous studies have investigated the ArK Trainer in its basic form using clear plexiglass, which allows direct visualization of tissue anchors.Purpose:Using a mixed-methods approach, we assessed and compared junior and senior trainees’ Seoul Medical Center (SMC) knot–tying performance under direct and indirect visualization.Study Design:Cross-sectional study.Methods:Fourteen orthopaedic surgery postgraduate trainees at a single medical school were recruited to participate. Trainees tied SMC knots using the Ark Trainer under direct and indirect visualization. A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate knot-tying proficiency and characterize participants’ approach to knot-tying. Knot-tying proficiency was evaluated using validated tools: a task-specific checklist (TSC), a global rating scale (GRS), and a proficiency scale (PS). Participants’ approach to knot-tying was characterized using Likert-type questionnaires and semistructured interviews. An α level of .10 was set a priori owing to the small pool of trainees.Results:The 14 participants included 7 junior residents (postgraduate years [PGYs] 1 and 2) and 7 senior residents (PGY ≥3), of whom 3 were fellows (PGY 6). Senior trainees outperformed junior trainees on both versions of the ArK Trainer: clear (GRS, P = .055; PS, P = .075) and covered (TSC, P = .05). Overall, participants performed better under direct visualization conditions (GRS, P = .05). In semistructured interviews, significantly more senior trainees discussed relying on haptic cues while tying knots under direct visualization (P = .021). The majority of trainees agreed that both versions of the ArK Trainer were realistic and appropriate practice formats for their level of training.Conclusion:Senior trainees were significantly more experienced than were junior trainees in arthroscopic skill and outperformed them on both configurations: direct (PS and GRS) and indirect (TSC) visualization. Experienced trainees were significantly more likely to report using tactile cues to aid knot-tying under indirect visualization. It is likely that inexperienced trainees rely more heavily on direct visualization and that the use of tactile cues may be an indicator of knot-tying proficiency. Trainees recommended progression from direct to indirect visualization configurations for inexperienced learners.

Learning and optimizing arthroscopic knot-tying by surgery residents using procedural simulation

IntroductionProcedural training of orthopedic surgery residents includes learning arthroscopic knot-tying. The models used comprise arthroscopy training modules of increasing complexity, although there is no procedural training guide for the acquisition of arthroscopic knot-tying skills. Few studies have focused on how residents learn arthroscopic knot-tying. The aim of our study was to determine the type of arthroscopic knot that is the easiest to perform and learn and that can be done the most successfully by orthopedic surgery residents. Materials and methodsEach participant had to learn five knots in a random order: Tennessee slider, Duncan loop, Revo knot (Surgeon's knot), Nicky knot, and the SMC (Samsung Medical Center) knot. The FAST Arthroscopy Workstation™ (Sawbones, Vashon Island, WA) was used for this study. Each participant could use a FAST Knot Tester™ (Sawbones®, Vashon Island, WA) to evaluate by themselves the biomechanical properties of the knots to optimize learning. Each participant had to rank how easy it was to learn this knot on a visual scale from 0 to 10. They also had to rank the reliability of the knots done on a visual scale from 0 to 10. Then, an independent rater assessed whether the knots were completed successfully; a knot was considered successful if it stretched by less than 3 mm when 60 N of load was applied. ResultsTen participants were included in the study; 250 knots were done and evaluated. When ranked from simplest to most complicated, the easiest knot to learn was the Surgeon's knot, followed by the Duncan loop, Tennessee slider, Nicky knot and SMC knot (p<0.0001). The overall success rate for the knots was 80%. There was a statistical trend for the Nicky being done better than the other arthroscopic knots (88% success rate). ConclusionFor orthopedics surgery residents, the surgeon's knot (Revo knot) was the easiest to learn, while the Nicky knot had the highest success rate. Level of evidenceII; prospective, randomized study with low power.

Orthopaedic Resident Arthroscopic Knot-Tying Skills Are Improved Using a Training Program and Knot-Tying Workstation

PurposeTo quantify an orthopaedic trainee’s ability to tie arthroscopic knots before and after a short cadaveric-based arthroscopy training period using a commercially available knot-tying workstation.MethodsDuring a weeklong cadaveric arthroscopic training camp, 15 third- and fourth-year orthopaedic residents were evaluated using a commercially available benchtop knot-tying workstation. At the beginning of the week (baseline), each participant was asked to tie 3 knots of his or her choice backed up by 3 half-hitches using nonabsorbable suture. Successful knots fit the sizer and elongated less than 3 mm after application of a 15-lb load. Afterward, residents watched a video demonstrating a sample knot and were encouraged to practice over the ensuing days. At the end of the week (post-training), residents were asked to tie 3 knots. The time to completion and success of each knot were recorded. To compare baseline and post-training knot success, t tests and χ2 analysis were performed.ResultsDuring baseline testing, residents successfully tied 26.7% of their knots (12 of 45 knots) in 352 ± 116 seconds (mean ± standard deviation). During post-training testing, residents successfully tied 66.7% of knots (30 of 45 knots, P = .00014) in 294 ± 63 seconds (P = .023), showing significant improvement in the time and ability to tie arthroscopic knots.ConclusionsWith a short cadaveric-based training period, orthopaedic trainees showed a significant improvement in their ability to tie arthroscopic knots on a commercially available benchtop knot-tying workstation. Given the initial low percentage of successfully tied knots and the limited opportunities for trainees to improve, trainees should be encouraged to practice and improve their skills.Clinical RelevanceWith training, residents can improve arthroscopic knot-tying abilities, which may allow them to successfully perform this critical task in the operating room.

Risk of Glove Perforations with Simulated Arthroscopic Knot Tying: a Randomized Biomechanical Study

Surgical knot tying has been known to create cuts and calluses on the fingertips of surgeons. Glove damage puts the surgeon at risk for transmittable diseases and places the patient at risk for infection. The goal of this study was to determine if the incidence of glove perforations increases with the number of arthroscopic knots tied using non-latex gloves. An in vitro controlled, randomized biomechanical study was completed where double gloved surgeons would perform two, four, six, or eight knots on a custom knot tying station. Each knot consisted of a sliding knot and three half hitches and tension was measured to ensure reproducibility between surgeons. Twenty-five double gloved pairs were allocated for each group in addition to twenty control gloves for a total of 420 gloves tested. Visual inspection, the FDA standard 1 L water load test and electroconductivity testing was performed to evaluate for perforations. 6/400 (1.5%) gloves involved in knot tying were found to have perforations while 1/20 (5%) of the control gloves had a detectable perforation. There were no holes identified in any of the gloves used to tie two knots by either load test or electroconductivity testing. There were two perforated gloves in the groups with four, six and eight knots. The difference was not statistically significant. The number of knots tied during a surgery is not independently associated with glove perforations. Other mechanical stresses, imbibition, and time of wear during surgery may play a role but were not evaluated. Given the low but demonstrative rate of perforations, double gloving is recommended.

Knot and Loop Security of High-Strength Suture Tape vs. High-Strength Suture Wire

To evaluate knot security, loop security, and knot size of suture tape and suture wire. The single load to failure (LTF) and cyclic loading of one arthroscopic knot (Samsung Medical Center [SMC]) and one hand-tied knot (surgeon’s knot) using two suture tapes (Broadband-[BB], Suture Tape-[ST]) and two No. 2 suture wires (MaxBraid-[MB], FiberWire-[FW]). A third tape (FiberTape-[FT]), not commonly tied arthroscopically, was included in the hand-tied group. Ten samples for each suture-knot combination were evaluated for knot security, loop security, and knot volume. Data were compared with analysis of variance and the Tukey post-hoc test and considered significant at P < 0.05. In single LTF testing, FT was stronger than any other suture-knot configuration. With surgeon’s knots, BB was stronger than MB and FW, while ST was superior to FW. With cyclic loading, BB and ST had less cyclic elongation than MB and FT in the hand-tied group. Among surgeon’s knots, loop elongation was smallest in BB. FT had the largest loop elongation among all configurations. No significant differences detected among SMC-knot configurations in single LTF, cyclic testing, and loop elongation. Measuring hand-tied knots, FW had greater knot volume than BB and ST, and MB was larger than ST. Excluding FT, surgeon’s knots were smaller than SMC-knots. Among SMC-knots, BB was bulkier than ST and MB. FT had largest knots overall. FT had the best knot security, but the poorest loop security and largest knot volume. With surgeon’s knots, BB had better knot security than both suture wires; ST also bested FW. Hand-tied BB, ST, and MB knots were stronger than their SMC-knot counterparts. BB demonstrated the best loop security among hand-tied knots; no differences were seen between surgeon’s and SMC-knots. Thinner tape designs (BB, ST) had smaller knots than wire designs when tied with surgeon’s knots, but not with SMC-knots.

Sliding or Nonsliding Arthroscopic Knots for Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Background:Knot tying is a crucial component of successful arthroscopic shoulder surgery. It is currently unknown whether sliding or nonsliding techniques result in superior clinical outcomes.Purpose:To assess the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic sliding knot (SK)– versus nonsliding knot (NSK)–tying techniques during arthroscopic shoulder surgery, including rotator cuff repair, Bankart repair, and superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) repair.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All English-language literature published between 2000 and 2018 reporting clinical outcomes utilizing SK- or NSK-tying techniques during rotator cuff repair, Bankart repair, and SLAP repair with a minimum 24-month follow-up was reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Information on type of surgery, knot used, failure rate, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes was collected. Patient-reported outcome measures included the Constant-Murley score, Rowe score, and visual analog scale for pain. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Coleman Methodology Score.Results:Overall, 9 studies (6 level 3 and 3 level 4) with a total of 671 patients (mean age, 52.8 years [range, 16-86 years]; 65.7% male; 206 SK and 465 NSK) were included. There were 4 studies that reported on Bankart repair in 148 patients (63 SK and 85 NSK), 3 on SLAP repair in 59 patients (59 SK), and 2 on rotator cuff repair in 464 patients (84 SK and 380 NSK). Also, 6 studies compared knot-tying with knotless techniques (3 Bankart repair studies and 3 SLAP repair studies), while the studies reporting the outcomes of SLAP repair evaluated SK-tying techniques only. The failure rate for Bankart repair was 3.2% (2/63) for SKs and 4.7% (4/85) for NSKs. The failure rate for rotator cuff repair was 2.4% (2/84) for SKs and 6.3% (24/380) for NSKs. The failure rate for SLAP repair was 11.9% (7/59). Because of inconsistencies in outcomes and procedures, no quantitative analysis was possible. The mean modified Coleman Methodology Score for all studies was 65.1 ± 8.77, indicating adequate methodology.Conclusion:The literature on clinical outcomes using SKs or NSKs for shoulder procedures is limited to level 4 evidence. Future studies should be prospective and focus on comparing the use of SKs and NSKs for shoulder procedures to elucidate which arthroscopic knot results in superior clinical outcomes.

Comparing the Influence of Different Overhand/Underhand Stacking Combinations of Reversing Half-Hitches on Alternating Posts on Arthroscopic Knot Security

Previous literature demonstrated the importance of stacking at least three reversing half-hitches on alternating posts (RHAPs) following arthroscopic knot placement. However, RHAPs construction involves looping the suture in either an "overhand" or an "underhand" manner as it relates to the post, which may affect knot security. This study investigated the presently unidentified influence of different stacking combinations of three RHAPs and suture material on arthroscopic knot security. Four different RHAPs stacking combinations were tied with three different suture materials. Ten knots of each configuration were tied using each suture material, resulting in 120 evaluated knots. A single load-to-failure test was performed. The mode of failure and mean ultimate clinical failure load were recorded. Different overhand/underhand stacking combinations of three RHAPs had a statistically significant effect on arthroscopic knot strength and security; however, all combinations surpassed the minimum ultimate clinical failure threshold. Knots constructed with either Force Fiber® or braided fishing line had mean ultimate clinical failure loads of greater than 200 N and most commonly failed due to suture material breakage (100%, 60 - 80% respectively). Conversely, FiberWire® demonstrated lower mean ultimate clinical failure loads and had a higher incidence of elongated but intact failure (60 - 90%). Different overhand/underhand stacking combinations of three RHAPs yielded an arthroscopic knot capable of secure tissue fixation. A significant effect was observed for suture materials on the knot strength. This study increases our understanding of suitable RHAPs construction following arthroscopic knot placement that can lead to improving the ultimate clinical failure loads of constructed arthroscopic knots observed between orthopedic surgeons.

Arthroscopic Knotless Remplissage for the Treatment of Hill-Sachs Lesions Using the PASTA Bridge Configuration

Recurrent glenohumeral dislocations can produce Hill-Sachs lesions—bony defects on the humeral head resulting from the humerus hitting the glenoid during dislocations. Some of these lesions can engage on the glenoid during motion, producing instability and potentially affecting the success of a labral repair. The remplissage was developed to address these Hill-Sachs lesions and improve stability. French for “filling,” the goal of the remplissage is to fill the Hill-Sachs lesion with the infraspinatus tendon, preventing the margins of the lesion from engaging with the glenoid. Analogous to restoring the rotator cuff footprint during repair, a primary goal of the remplissage is to have the infraspinatus cover the Hill-Sachs lesion. The partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) bridge was originally developed for partial-thickness rotator cuff repair in situ, but additional uses have been found in other settings. The PASTA bridge uses a medial row horizontal mattress with a lateral anchor to create a linked construct to effectively distribute force and provide adequate coverage of the lesion. Knotless anchor technology used in this procedure prevents the need for arthroscopic knot tying and potentially damaging knot stacks. This Technical Note describes a remplissage technique using the PASTA bridge configuration to address Hill-Sachs lesions associated with recurrent glenohumeral instability.