Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis Research Articles

Application of three dimensional printed personalized guide plate assisted arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of ankle arthritis

Objective: To compare the efficacy of conventional open ankle fusion and three dimensional(3D) printed guide plate assisted arthroscopic ankle fusion. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 256 patients with advanced traumatic ankle arthritis, who were admitted to the Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from May 2018 to February 2023 and underwent ankle fusion procedures. The study cohort comprised 119 males and 137 females, with an age of (59.6±9.5) years (range: 37 to 83 years). Among them, 175 cases underwent internal fixation with plates and screws (58 cases through the combined medial and lateral approach, and 117 cases through the simple lateral approach), 48 cases underwent internal fixation with screws through the anterior approach (conventional open group), and 33 cases underwent minimally invasive arthroscopic ankle fusion assisted by 3D printed guide plate (3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group). Propensity score matching was employed to achieve a 1∶1 match(caliper value=0.02) between the baseline characteristics of patients in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group and the conventional open group. Perioperative and follow-up data between the two groups were compared using the t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test,χ² test, or Fisher's exact probability method, as appropriate. Results: Matching was successfully achieved with 20 cases in both the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group and the conventional open group, and there were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). The operation time in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group was significantly longer than that in the conventional open group ((88.9±5.6) minutes vs. (77.9±11.7) minutes;t=-2.392, P=0.022), while the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopies ((1.7±0.8) times vs. (5.2±1.2) times; t=10.604, P<0.01) and length of hospitalization ((5.5±0.9) days vs. (6.4±1.5) days;t=2.480, P=0.018) were significantly lower in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group compared to the conventional open group. The fusion rate was 95.0% (19/20) in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group and 85.0% (17/20) in the conventional open group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ²=1.111,P=0.605). The fusion time was (12.1±2.0) weeks in the conventional open group and (11.1±1.7) weeks in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=1.607, P=0.116). At the final follow-up, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot scale was (72.6±5.5)points in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group and (70.5±5.8)points in the conventional open group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=-1.003, P=0.322). The VAS score of the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group was (M(IQR)) 1.50 (1.00) points, lower than that of the conventional open group by 3.00 (1.00) points, with statistically significant differences (Z=-3.937, P<0.01). The complication rate was significantly higher in the conventional open group (25.0%(5/20) vs. 5.0%(1/20), P=0.182). Conclusion: 3D printed guide plate assisted arthroscopic ankle fusion exhibited several advantages, including reduced frequency of fluoroscopies, alleviation of postoperative pain, and decreased complications and length of hospitalization.

Effect of a compression staple on correction of varus deformity during arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis

BackgroundArthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has become popular because of its higher rate of bone union, lower invasiveness, and shorter hospital stays compared to those of open arthrodesis. However, postoperative malalignment is often observed for severe varus deformity, which can cause nonunion, pain, and adjacent joint arthrosis. A compression staple can provide a persistent, strong compressive force on the bone surface. This study aimed to clarify the difference in alignment correction in AAA by comparing a compression staple and screws fixation with screws-only fixation pre- and postoperatively. MethodsSeventy ankles in 67 patients undergoing AAA were retrospectively reviewed. AAA with three screws through the distal tibia was performed in 53 ankles, and 17 ankles underwent AAA with a compression staple and two screws. After the preparation of the joint surface arthroscopically, patients in the S group had three canulated cancellous screws inserted through the medial tibia. Patients in the CS group had a compression staple placed at the lateral aspect of the tibiotalar joint and two screws inserted through the medial side. Clinical scores and pre-and postoperative alignment on plain radiographs were compared between the two procedures. ResultsThere were no significant differences in the pre-and postoperative Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale. One ankle in the S group exhibited nonunion. There were no significant differences in talar tilt and tibiotalar angles between the groups. The tibial plafond angle in the CS group was significantly lower than that in the S group (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, talar tilt and tibiotalar angles on the coronal image, and the lateral tibiotalar angle in the CS group were significantly lower than those in the S group (p < 0.05). ConclusionAAA with a compression staple and two-screw fixations could obtain more optimal alignments than AAA with screw-only fixation, even in cases with severe varus deformity.

Arthroscopic ankle surgery in people with haemophilia.

People with haemophilia (PWH) not administered primary haematological prophylaxis since childhood, that is, those treated haematologically on demand or not treated at all, often experience the degeneration of the ankles, leading to pain and functional impairment. To analyse the outcomes and complications of arthroscopic ankle surgery performed on PWH. For this narrative review of the literature, a search was conducted in PubMed on 2, December 2023, using the keywords "haemophilia", "ankle" and "arthroscopy". Of the 29 articles identified, 15 specifically related to ankle arthroscopy in PWH were selected (inclusion criterion). The remaining articles did not meet this requirement (exclusion criterion) and were therefore eliminated. Arthroscopic procedures (arthroscopic synovectomy, debridement and arthrodesis of the ankle) are increasingly used in the surgical treatment of haemophilic ankle arthropathy. Although arthroscopic ankle surgery offers good outcomes in patients with haemophilia, the procedure is not free of complications, which range from 7.9% for arthroscopic ankle debridement to 13.1% in arthroscopic ankle synovectomy and 17.8% in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis, respectively. The non-union rate of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is 7.1% (2/28). Although arthroscopic interventions in the haemophilic ankle (synovectomy, debridement, arthrodesis) offer good functional outcomes, they are associated with a non-negligible rate of complications. Arthroscopic ankle surgery in PWH is major surgery and should be treated as such.

Characteristics of Nonunion After Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Nonunion is a major complication of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. However, the characteristics and risk factors of nonunion are not well understood. This retrospective multicenter observational study aimed to clarify the characteristics of nonunion after arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. We included 154 patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis at any 1 of 5 institutions. Patients were divided into 2 groups: union and nonunion, and the groups were compared. Age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, corticosteroid use, diagnosis, treatment information, treatment protocol, radiographic evaluation, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded and analyzed. On radiographs, bony union was observed in 142 ankles (91.0%) but not in 12 ankles (9.0%). Postoperative radiographic tibial bony gap (mm) was significantly larger in the nonunion group (medial = 1.98, center = 1.65, anterior = 2.21, middle = 1.72, posterior = 3.01) than in the union group (medial = 1.35, center = 1.13, anterior = 1.28, middle = 1.03, posterior = 2.03). Furthermore, the visual analog score (VAS) of pain and pain-related self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q) subscale score significantly worsened in the nonunion group (VAS = 3.83, SAFE-Q subscale score = 69.8) compared to that in the union group (VAS = 1.35, SAFE-Q subscale score = 76.6). A larger radiographic tibiotalar bony gap was observed in the nonunion group. Other measurement outcomes were not associated with nonunion. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes markedly worsened in the nonunion group.

Comparative results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis vs. open arthrodesis in patients with diabetes-associated Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy

BackgroundSeveral studies demonstrated a considerable complication rate for open ankle or TTC arthrodesis in patients with diabetes, revision surgery and ulceration. Extensive approaches in combination with multimorbide patients have been suggested as the rationale behind the increased complication rate.MethodsSingle-centre, prospective case-control study compared arthroscopic vs. open ankle arthrodesis in patients with Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy of the foot. 18 patients with septic Charcot Neuro-Arthropathy Sanders III–IV received an arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis with TSF (Taylor Spatial Frame®) fixation combined with different additional procedures required for infect treatment and hindfoot realignment. The ankle arthrodesis was required for the realignment of the hindfoot in Sanders IV patients, arthritis or in case of infection. 12 patients were treated with open ankle arthrodesis and TSF fixation combined with various additional procedures.ResultsA significant improvement has been shown in radiological data in both groups. A significant lower complication rate has been registered in arthroscopic group. A significant correlation was seen between major complications and therapeutic anticoagulation as well as smoking.ConclusionIn high-risk patients with diabetes and plantar ulceration excellent results could be demonstrated in arthroscopically performed ankle arthrodesis with midfoot osteotomy using TSF as fixation devise.

Association of Preexisting Triple Fusion and Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis nonunion.

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) is a successful treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. A significant early complication of AAA is symptomatic nonunion. Published nonunion rates range from 8% to 13%. Longer term, there is concern that it predisposes to subtalar joint (STJ) fusion. To better understand these risks, we undertook a retrospective investigation of primary AAA. All adult AAA cases conducted at our institution over a 10-year period were reviewed. A total of 284 eligible AAA cases in 271 patients were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was radiographic union. Secondary outcome measures included reoperative rate, postoperative complications and subsequent STJ fusion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify nonunion risk factors. The overall nonunion rate was 7.7%. Smoking (odds ratio [OR] 4.76 [1.67, 13.6], P = .004) and previous triple fusion (OR 40.29 [9.46, 171.62], P < .001) were independent risk factors on univariate analysis. Only prior triple fusion persisted as a major risk factor associated with nonunion on multivariate analysis (OR 18.3 [3.4, 99.7], P < .001). Seventy percent of patients with a previous triple fusion went on to develop nonunion compared to 5.5% of those without. Increasing age, obesity, surgical grade, diabetes, postoperative weightbearing plan, steroid use, and inflammatory arthropathy were not significant risk factors. The leading cause of reoperation was hardware removal (18%). There were 5 superficial (1.8%) and 4 deep (1.4%) infections. Eleven (4.2%) required subsequent STJ fusion. The "survivorship" of STJ post AAA was 98%, 85%, and 74% at 2, 5, and 9 years, respectively. As the largest study of AAA in the literature, our findings suggest prior triple fusion is a major independent risk factor for AAA nonunion. These patients should be counseled of this high risk and may benefit from alternative surgical options. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Improvement in clinical outcome and quality of life after arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in paralytic foot drop

BackgroundParalytic foot-drop is a disabling deformity that results from nerve or direct muscle injuries. Palliative surgeries such as tendon transfer and ankle arthrodesis are reserved for permanent deformity, with the arthroscopic technique had not been widely studied before. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome and quality of life after arthroscopic ankle fusion of paralytic foot-drop deformity.Materials and MethodsThe patients who were retrospectively enrolled in this study underwent arthroscopic ankle fusion for paralytic foot-drop deformity between March 2017 and December 2021. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle–hindfoot score and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) were the measures used for clinical assessment. To judge the union, serial plain radiographs of the ankle were obtained. The preoperative and postoperative means were analyzed utilizing a two-tailed paired t-test, with a p value of less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance.ResultsThis study included 21 consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 35.09 ± 4.5 months and a mean age of 41.5 ± 6.1 years. Highly significant improvements were observed between the preoperative and final follow-up means of the AOFAS score (from 57.6 ± 4.6 to 88.3 ± 2.7) and CAIT (from 12.1 ± 2.2 to 28.9 ± 1.01; p ˂ 0.00001 for both). All patients attained radiographic union and resumed their previous occupations without reporting serious adverse effects.ConclusionsArthroscopic ankle fusion is an effective, minimally invasive palliative surgery for patients suffering from permanent paralytic foot-drop deformity. This technique was shown to provide good functional and radiologic outcomes without significant complications.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort; level of evidence (IV).

Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis with Circular External Fixator: Case Report

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Arthroscopy; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: One of the options for the surgical treatment of tibial pilon fracture is the circular external fixator. Similar results are found in the literature, with good outcomes in relation to a low incidence of infection, osteomyelitis and soft tissue injuries compared to open reduction and internal fixation. Even so, evolution to a probable arthrodesis occurs in 3-27% of cases, showing that the prognosis for this type of fracture is dismal. Options for performing joint fusion include open arthrotomy with joint decortication and internal fixation (plates and/or screws), in addition to arthroscopic joint preparation, a method that has been gaining popularity since 1983, in its first description. Fusion through circular external fixation is an excellent option that has shown good results in the literature. Methods: Patient with left tibial pilon fracture. Uniplanar external fixation was performed in the emergency room, with subsequent conversion to transarticular circular external fixation. After 4 months of review, the patient has evidence of tibiotarsal arthrosis. It was decided to perform arthrodesis using the arthroscopic technique, performing joint compression with circular external fixation, already installed in the patient. Spinal anesthesia was performed on the patient and the Smarch tourniquet was used. First, access to the anteromedial portal, trocar and optic passage was obtained, and the intermediate dorsal cutaneous branch of the superficial peroneal nerve was identified laterally, and the anterolateral portal was constructed. Through these portals, a 4.5mm Shaver blade was used to perform curettage and joint debridement, in addition to curettes and osteotomes. In addition to arthroscopic control, fluoroscopic observation was also performed for adequate joint preparation.Finally, joint compression was performed with the device already installed. Results: The patient presented complete consolidation of the tibio-tarsal arthrodesis. At the moment (2 years and 10 months postoperatively) the patient does not use crutches/gait accessories, does not limit his daily activities due to foot problems, does not have difficulty going down and up stairs, has good ankle alignment, plantigrade foot, has no joint pain and can walk long distances. Conclusion: This work showed a technique rarely reported or cited in the orthopedic literature, not presenting any article as an original description. Supported by the description of the procedure by the robust final functional results of the patient in question, this report establishes the basis for the widespread method and new works to emerge to enrich the debate and study around arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method.

907 Total Ankle Arthroplasty Versus Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis: A Novel Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Utility

Abstract Aim End-stage ankle arthritis poses numerous healthcare challenges, not least given its high prevalence but also significant limitations in treatment modality. This study compares functional outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty (TAR) versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA). Secondary objectives were to compare complication rates and perform a health economic analysis to estimate cost-effectiveness to the NHS. Method A prospective, single centre cohort study of TAR versus AAA in patients diagnosed with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis between 2015 and 2020 with homogenous characteristics. Primary outcomes were assessed through comparing Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MoxFQ) scores taken pre-operatively and at specific intervals post-treatment up to one year. A cost-utility analysis via decision tree modelling was performed to derive an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results The study involved 42 patients. TAR (22 patients) demonstrated a better functional improvement following cast removal at 3 months (Ẋ = 19.1 [TAR]/ 7.4 [AAA], p= 0.044, CI 95%) and 6 months (Ẋ= 26.1 [TAR]/ 11.5 [AA], p= 0.031, CI 95%). The average improvement of MoxFQ scores over the study was greater following TAR. Values derived from cost-utility analysis produced an ICER of £8,639.51/QALY (quality of life year) for TAR implying that the procedure is cost-effective compared to AAA with respect to the NICE treatment threshold of £20,000/QALY. Conclusions TAR provided improved patient reported outcome scores following cast removal. Although overall treatment costs are greater with TAR, reduced complications and better functional outcomes demonstrated greater economic benefit with TAR compared to AAA.

Does Demineralized Bone Matrix Affect the Nonunion Rate in Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis?

Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has been shown to have positive effects on union rates in many orthopedic subspecialties; however, minimal evidence exists about bone graft substitutes in foot and ankle surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare nonunion rates in arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in patients receiving DBM with those without. We hypothesized DBM to be associated with a decreased risk of nonunion. This retrospective review includes 516 consecutive ankle arthrodesis cases from March 2002 to May 2016. Of these, 58 ankles (56 patients) that underwent primary arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis met the inclusion criteria, and 31 of these ankles received DBM, while 27 did not. Nonunion was assessed by clinical examination and routine postoperative radiographs. If nonunion was suspected, a computed tomography (CT) scan was performed. The primary outcome measure was nonunion rate. Secondary outcome measures included wound complications, return to operating room (OR), and rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). From the study cases, 58 were available for final follow-up. The average age was 55.9 years (±17.4), and mean follow-up was 43.0 months (range 6.3–119.4). There was no difference in nonunion rate in patients who received DBM (4/31, 12.9%) versus those who did not (4/27, 14.8%) (p = 0.83). Similarly, when comparing the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in superficial wound complications (6.5% vs. 3.7%, p = 1.0) or rate of return to OR (29% or 0.037/person-years vs. 37% or 0.099/person-years; p = 0.20). No major complications including deep wound infections, DVTs, or PEs occurred. This is the largest study to directly compare nonunion rates and complications for patients receiving DBM versus those who did not in primary arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. No significant association was found between DBM usage and risk of nonunion, wound complications, return to OR, or postoperative DVT or PE development.

Larger sagittal inter-screw distance/tibial width ratio reduces delayed union or non-union after arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has risks of complications, such as delayed union and non-union. The number and direction of the inserted screws have been reported as important factors affecting the time to union of AAA. However, the ratio of inter-screw distance (ISD) to tibial width (TW) in different planes has not been investigated. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effect of this ratio on bone union following AAA. We retrospectively enrolled 63 patients (64 ankles) undergoing AAA from 2013 to 2019. Then, their age, body mass index (BMI), sex, diabetes mellitus (DM) status, Takakura-Tanaka classification, number of screws and radiographic parameters were analysed. The patients had a mean age of 70.3 (range, 45-91) years. Bone fusion was achieved in 57 ankles (89%) in a mean period of 3.3 (range, 2-6) postoperative months. There were four cases of delayed union and three of non-union. No significant differences in age, BMI, sex, DM, Takakura-Tanaka classification, and number of screws could bedetected between the groups. However, the sagittal ISD/TW ratio was significantly larger in the union group than in the delayed/non-union group with a cut-off value of 57.0%. Larger sagittal ISD/TW ratios result in reduced post-AAA delayed union or non-union. The surgeon should be aware that the anterior and posterior screw widths should be approximately 60% or more of the anteroposterior width of the tibia.

Arthroscopic Versus Open Ankle Arthrodesis: A 5-Year Follow Up.

End-stage ankle arthritis has long been managed surgically with open ankle arthrodesis (OAA). Since the first published report in 1983, arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has been thought to be associated with improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and fewer complications. The purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term PROMs, major complications, and reoperations for these 2 approaches at up to 15 years of follow-up. This longitudinal cohort study included patients at our institution who underwent primary ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage arthritis. Demographic data and preoperative COFAS (Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) ankle arthritis type were collected for all patients. PROMs were completed preoperatively, at 6 months, and annually thereafter to 5 years. PROMs were compared at all time points with use of a mixed-effects regression model that adjusted for preoperative variables and scores. Major complications and reoperations at the site of the ankle arthrodesis were also compared. Of 1,294 patients who were screened for inclusion, 351 who had undergone ankle arthrodesis between 2003 and 2019 were eligible for the study. Of those, 223 had undergone AAA and 128 had undergone OAA. The 2 groups were similar preoperatively with respect to demographics, but COFAS Type-4 arthritis was relatively more common in the OAA group and Type-1 arthritis was relatively more common in the AAA group. In addition, the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) score and Ankle Arthritis Score (AAS) were better in the AAA group. In the mixed-effects model analysis, the differences in postoperative outcome scores between the groups were not significant. The risk of revision due to malunion or nonunion was similar in both groups (6% in the AAA group, compared with 4% in the OAA group). Deep infection and wound complications did not occur in the arthroscopic group but occurred in 4% of the patients in the OAA group. After adjustment for baseline patient characteristics, there were no differences in PROMs between the 2 techniques. Ankle arthrodeses done arthroscopically had a similar revision rate but lower infection rate compared with those done with the open technique. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient and Surgical Factors Affecting Fusion Rates After Arthroscopic and Open Ankle Fusion: A Review of a High-Risk Cohort.

We present a case series with the objective of identifying risk factors for nonunion after open and arthroscopic primary ankle arthrodesis. Eighty-seven patients who underwent primary ankle arthrodesis and met inclusion criteria were divided into open (N = 46) and arthroscopic (N = 41) groups. Patient and operative characteristics were retrospectively analyzed as possible risk factors for nonunion within each technique. The nonunion rate was 11% in the open and 12% in the arthroscopic group. Obesity, smoking, and ASA class 3 were highly prevalent in both groups. In the arthroscopic group, a remote history of infection and the use of headed screws had notably higher risk of nonunion, though not statistically significant. In the open group, use of bone graft trended toward lower risk of nonunion, though also not statistically significant. The results of this study demonstrated, nonunion rates are comparable between open and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in high-risk patients. For patients with a remote history of infection, open ankle arthrodesis may be preferable, and bone graft importance may vary with open versus arthroscopic technique. III.

Ankle arthrodesis in patients with haemophilia-associated ankle arthropathy - does the technique influence the outcome?

Management of symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle in patients with haemophilia can be challenging. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has been shown in non-haemophiliac patients to provide similar or superior rates of fusion to open ankle fusion. However, the literature regarding ankle arthrodesis in patients with haemophilia is limited. Our aim was to compare the rate of successful fusion between open and arthroscopic assisted ankle arthrodesis in patients with haemophilia. A retrospective study was performed. All patients with haemophilia who underwent ankle arthrodesis at our centre were included. Outcomes including peri- and post-operative complications, and lengths of stay were extracted from patients' records. Radiographs were reviewed for signs of successful arthrodesis. Seventeen arthrodesis procedures were performed in 13 patients between 1980 and 2017. Nine procedures were performed arthroscopically and eight were open. Ten patients were diagnosed with haemophilia A and three with haemophilia B. The success rates of arthroscopic and open tibiotalar arthrodesis were 100% and 87.5% respectively. Four complications occurred. In the open technique group, there was one non-union. The same patient also developed subsequent haematoma after revision surgery. One patient developed a superficial wound infection which resolved with antibiotics. In the arthroscopic group, one patient developed a pseudoarthrosis of the distal tibiofibular joint which required a revision procedure. The results of this study suggest that arthroscopic ankle fusion for haemophilia- associated arthropathy is a viable option, with the rate of successful fusion being comparable to open procedures.

Arthroscopic vs Open Ankle Arthrodesis: A 5-Year Comparison

Category:Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; ArthroscopyIntroduction/Purpose:End-stage ankle arthritis has long been managed surgically with open ankle arthrodesis (OAA). More recently, arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) is thought to be associated with improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and fewer complications. The objective of this study was to systematically compare these two approaches in long-term PROMs, major complication rates and survivorship of the ankle fusion.Methods:In this retrospective longitudinal cohort study, all patients with an ankle fusion done at our institution and a minimum two-year follow-up were screened for inclusion. Patients demographics at baseline were collected including: age, gender, BMI, smoking status, diabetes status as well as preoperative ankle arthritis COFAS (Canadian Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society) type. The following PROMs were completed preoperatively, at 6-months and annually thereafter to five years: AAS, AOS, SF-36, expectation, satisfaction and swelling scores. PROMs were compared at all timepoints using a mixed-effects regression model adjusted for baseline patients' demographics, COFAS type and PROMs. Major postoperative complications and survival analysis/rate of revision of the ankle fusions were also compared.Results:Of 874 patients screened for inclusion, 351 ankle fusions done between 2003 and 2019 were eligible for the study, 223 AAA and 128 OAA. The two groups were similar at baseline with respect to demographics, but COFAS type was higher in the OAA group and AAS and AOS scores were better in the AAA group. At one-year post-operatively, there was a higher mean AAS score in the AAA group, but there were no other differences in outcomes at any other timepoint. Survivorship of the ankle fusion in the arthroscopic group was lower (ie higher rate of revision) due to a higher rate of amputation or fusion. Deep infection and wound complications were more common with OAA and accounted for most ankle fusion revisions in this group.Conclusion:There were no consistent differences in PROMs of patients who underwent AAA versus OAA patients up to five- years postoperatively. Ankle fusions done arthroscopically had a lower survivorship rate compared to those done with the open approach due to a higher rate of major complications. Previously proposed advantages of AAA over OAA may therefore need to re-assessed and weighed against the technical challenges and associated complications of the arthroscopic technique.

WITHDRAWN: Ankle arthrodesis in patients with haemophilia-associated ankle arthropathy — Does the technique influence the outcome?

Management of symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle in patients with haemophilia can be challenging. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has been shown in non-haemophiliac patients to provide similar or superior rates of fusion to open ankle fusion. However, the literature regarding ankle arthrodesis in patients with haemophilia is markedly limited. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of successful fusion between open and arthroscopic assisted arthrodesis in patients with haemophilic arthropathy of the ankle.

Pain Mapping as a Predictive Model for Diagnosis and Treatment in Foot and Ankle Conditions

Category:Other; Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Bunion; Hindfoot; Lesser Toes; Midfoot/ForefootIntroduction/Purpose:With the COVID19 pandemic, virtual consultations are becoming a necessity. Clinicians are having to adapt consultations to determine where patients' symptoms are, and what the appropriate next line of investigation or treatment should be, without the benefit of traditional face-to-face contact. The aim of this project was therefore to use pain mapping in foot and ankle conditions, in order to see if there was a predictive correlation between certain symptomatic areas and the ultimate surgical treatment required by patients.Methods:Data was collected prospectively from patients attending foot and ankle clinics from 2014 to 2019, and this was cross- matched with operative data subsequently. Data included patient demographics, co-morbidities, smoking status and previous injuries or surgeries. In a structured questionnaire, patients also marked the regions of the foot and ankle that they thought were the most symptomatic. The foot and ankle was divided into 12 segments for the purpose of analysis.Results:A total of 2007 patients completed these questionnaires, from which operative data was available for 407 patients. In the first instance, data was analysed for 122 patients who underwent one of five specific procedures. Pain mapping was found to have a good predictive value for first MTP fusion and bunion surgery (n=20, 46), 1st metatarsal cheilectomy (n=10) and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (n=23). The least predictive pain mapping was seen for patients who had a triple arthrodesis (n=23), with those patients presenting with pain more globally in the foot and ankle.Conclusion:The results suggest that pain mapping can be used effectively as postal questionnaires, prior to a virtual consultation, as an aid to predict diagnosis and the ultimate treatment required in some specific foot and ankle conditions.

Technique Tip: Correcting Malalignment of the Talus Using a Pin-Based Distracter During Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis

It is technical demanding work to perform arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis to treat end-stage ankle osteoarthritis with excessive talar tilt. This article aimed to provide an effective technique tip for the treatment of Takakura stage 3b ankle osteoarthritis with a talar tilt angle more than 15 degrees under arthroscopy. A conventional anterior arthroscopic approach is used. After arthroscopic examination and debridement, one pin which is parallel to the distal tibial surface is inserted into the tibial side of the ankle, the other pin which is parallel to the talar dome surface is inserted into the talar side of the ankle, both at the coronal plane. Then a distracter is used in the medial side to open the interspace of the tibiotalar joint and correct the talar tilt through the 2 pins, under which circumstance the tibiotalar joint surface can be well prepared. Next an anti-distracter is used in the lateral side to close the tibiotalar interspace and correct the talar tilt through the 2 pins, in which condition 3 fully threaded cannulated lag screws can be inserted through guide pins in a cross pattern to fix the ankle joint. We used the pin-based distracter to open and close tibiotalar interspace, correct the talar tilt and maintain a good mechanical axis for fusion, and the outcomes were good.

Do degree of coronal plane deformity and patient related factors affect union and outcome of Arthroscopic versus Open Ankle Arthrodesis?

BackgroundThis study aimed to analyse if union and outcome of Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis (AAA) versus Open Ankle Arthrodesis (OAA) were influenced by the extent of coronal plane deformity and to report if patient related factors influence union. MethodsA total of 122 ankle arthrodesis procedures were included in the study. These were divided into two groups; Group A (n = 99) with deformity less than 15° and Group B (n = 23) with deformity greater than or equal to 15°. Data was collected on patient demographics, medical comorbidities (smoking, diabetes, obesity) and time to union. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) evaluated were Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire, EuroQol-5D and EuroQol visual analogue health thermometer (EQ-VAS). ResultsThe mean follow-up in Group A and B was 74.87 and 89.17 months respectively. The average deformity in Group A was 4.9° for AAA and 5.8° for OAA. In Group B it was 18.9° (maximum 28° varus) for AAA and 22.1° (maximum 41° valgus) for OAA. The overall union rate was 95% in Group A (AAA-94%; OAA-100%; [p = 0.20]) and 87% in Group B (AAA-100%; OAA-67%; [p = 0.02]). Mean time to union was 13.2 weeks in Group A (AAA-13.3 weeks; OAA-12.8 weeks; [p = 0.73]) compared to 12.4 weeks for Group B (AAA-12.9 weeks; OAA-11.8 weeks; [p = 0.56]). Irrespective of the extent of deformity and type of surgery, smokers had a 10 times higher likelihood of non-union (p = 0.03). In Group A, none of the PROMs showed significant difference between AAA and OAA. In Group B, EQ-VAS score reached statistical significance (p = 0.03) in favour of AAA whereas other PROMs showed no difference. ConclusionAAA is reproducible in achieving union in end stage ankle arthritis and good PROMs can be expected even in ankles with larger deformities. Regardless of the type of surgery and extent of deformity, smoking is a significant risk factor for non-union. Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative series.

Comparative study between Blair’s procedure of ankle fusion and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Our objective was to perform a comparative study in terms of functional outcome of Blair’s procedure of ankle fusion versus arthroscopic methods of ankle fusion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;: 25 patients that underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis versus Blair’s procedure of ankle fusion were taken for study at government medical college, Srinagar (VCSGGIMS and R) from the duration 2015-2021. Clinical assessment was done foot and ankle disability index and visual analog scale score for pain. Radiological assessment was done by serial X-rays. Regular follow-ups were taken till one year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;: Both modalities proved to be equally effective in terms of patient’s functional outcome. Our analysis showed that Blair’s procedure ankle fusion was associated with a lower fusion rate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13-0.52, p=0.0002), longer tourniquet time (MD 16.49, 95% CI 9.46-23.41, p&amp;lt;0.00001), and longer length of stay (MD 1.60,95% CI 1.10-2.10, p&amp;lt;0.00001) compared to arthroscopic ankle fusion; however, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.76-7.64, p=0.14), overall complication rate (OR: 1.54, 95% CI 0.80-2.96, p=0.20), and operation time (MD 4.09, 95% CI 2.4910.66, p=0.22).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;: We found no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. Further high quality randomized controlled trials that are adequately powered are required.&lt;/p&gt;