Prosthetic Arteriovenous Grafts Research Articles

Use of Basilic vein in arteriovenous fistulas construction for hemodialysis access. Is it a good option alternative to prosthetic arteriovenous grafts?

For patients with a failed forearm autogenous fistula (AF) and an exhausted cephalic vein, there is controversy about whether a brachial basilic AF with transposition or an arteriovenous prosthetic bridging graft (BG) must be the second vascular access option. This work measured and compared these two modalities according to patency rates, complications, and revisions. A retrospective study of 104 cases that had either a brachial basilic AF (72) or an Arteriovenous BG (32). Technical success, operative complications, procedurerelated mortality, maturation time, functional primary, secondary, and overall patency rates were all assessed. Technical success was obtained in all participants. No procedure-linked mortality. Maturation time for BGs was significantly shorter than AFs. The complication rate was significantly higher in BGs than in AFs. The most prevalent complication was access thrombosis. The functional primary patency rate was significantly higher in AF than in BG at 12-month followup: 77.7% vs 53.1% (p < 0.012). secondary patency rate was higher in AF than in BG at 1-year follow-up 62.5% vs 42.8% (p = 0.063), respectively. In addition, BGs required more interventions to preserve patency. AF had higher primary, secondary and overall functional patency rates and needed fewer procedures to keep patency than BGs. Cases that need early vascular access as a result of central venous catheter complications or who have a reduced life expectancy may benefit from BGs.

Management of infected arteriovenous grafts for haemodialysis: Outcomes and strategies using a novel objective scoring system.

In haemodialysis patients with exhausted autogenous options, prosthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are frequently utilised as tertiary vascular access. However, the prosthetic nature of AVGs precipitates an increased risk of infection which may translate to excess morbidity and life-threatening complications. The current evidence remains divided on the optimal treatment strategy for arteriovenous graft infections (AVGi) with arguments for conservative management by antibiotics, salvaging with graft revision or total/subtotal excision. To address this gap, we assessed the outcomes of AVGi patients treated in our institution, developing an AVGi severity classification model and a proposed treatment algorithm to guide AVGi management. We conducted a single centre retrospective review of outcomes of patients with AVGi managed either by sole antibiotics therapy, graft revision or surgical excision between June 2016 and May 2021. Outcomes of AVGi patients across differing treatment groups were compared, including 1-year mortality, 6-month and 1-year functional vascular access. We also analysed the outcomes of tunnelled haemodialysis lines (THL), which were used as a temporary vascular access in several AVGi patients in our study. A total of 34 AVGi patients were managed within that time frame and included in the study (5 conservatively management by antibiotics, 5 graft revisions and 24 surgical excision) with a mean age of 60.4 ± 14.4 years (67.6% males). Overall 1-year mortality was 14.7%. A 6-month functional vascular access status across the three groups stood at 60%, 60% and 10% while 1-year functional vascular access status was 60%, 75% and 42% respectively. When clinically appropriate, conservative management by antibiotics or salvage/graft revision can present as prudent AVGi treatment options. The adoption of our proposed severity classification system and treatment algorithm provides a more thorough objective assessment of the infection and helps guide the clinical decision-making process.

SUPERA stent placement for salvaging early recurrent arteriovenous graft thrombosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: A single-center study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the patency of the helical interwoven SUPERA stent for salvaging prosthetic arteriovenous (AV) grafts with rapidly recurrent thrombotic occlusion developed within a short time period after successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. From December 2019 to September 2021, the data of 20 patients with AV graft who had the SUPERA stent inserted satisfying the following conditions were consecutively collected. (1) More than 1 year has passed since the AV access operation; (2) Thrombotic re-occlusion of AV graft occurred within 3 months after previous successful endovascular treatment; (3) Residual stenosis is greater than 30% after full effacement of balloon angioplasty in the primary lesion. Post-interventional target lesion primary patency (TLPP), access circuit primary patency (ACPP), and secondary patency (SP) were calculated. Primary lesions of early recurrent arteriovenous graft thrombosis were found in 13 patients with graft-vein anastomosis, six patients with intra-graft stenosis, and one patient with outflow vein complications. The lesions showed residual stenosis in 47.4% (interquartile range: 44.1%-55.3%) of patients despite full-effacement balloon angioplasty. Clinical success was achieved in all patients with full-expansion of the stents at the 1-month follow-up. The TLPP was 70.7% and 32% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, and ACPP was 47.5% and 6.8% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The SP was 76.1% and 57.1% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. No cannulation complications occurred in the six patients with installation inside the graft. No hemodialysis or stent fracture occurred in any patient during the follow-up period. The SUPERA stent may have a role in salvaging AV grafts with early recurrent thrombosis due to its greater radial force and its conformability and can be useful in treating stenosis involving the elbow or axilla, with fair patency and low complication rates.

Surgical creation of lower extremity fistula and grafts.

Lower limb vascular access (LLVA) should be considered for patients in whom upper extremity access has been exhausted. The decisional process around vascular access (VA) site selection should incorporate a patient centered approach that aligns with End Stage Kidney Disease life-plan as recently described in proffered in 2019 Vascular Access Guidelines. The current surgical approaches to LLVA can be divided into two main groups: (A) autologous arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs); (B) synthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). The autologous AVFs include both the femoral vein (FV) and great saphenous vein (GSV) transpositions, while prosthetic AVGs in the thigh position are appropriate for certain patient subtypes. Good durability has been described for autogenous FV transposition as well as AVGs with both demonstrating acceptable primary and secondary patency rates. Major complications such as steal syndrome, limb edema, and bleeding and minor complications such as wound-related infection, hematoma and delayed wound healing have been noted. LLVA is commonly reserved for the patient in whom the only alternative VA may be a tunneled catheter with its attendant morbidity. In this clinical circumstance, successful LLVA has the opportunity to be a life-saving surgical therapy when successfully performed. We describe a thoughtful approach that focuses on patient selection to optimize success and mitigate complications associated with LLVA.

A Single-Center Experience with Forearm Arteriovenous Loop Grafts for Hemodialysis

Autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains the standard of hemodialysis (HD) access; however, it cannot be reasonably obtained in all patients. For patients with contraindications to AVFs, prosthetic arteriovenous graft (AVG) remains an alternative. AVGs are plagued by high failure rates; however, there is a paucity of literature examining this. This study aims to examine a single-center review of outcomes of forearm loop AVGs in patients requiring HD access. A single institution, retrospective chart review was completed from 2012 to 2019, including demographics, end-stage renal disease etiology, brachial vessel diameters, and comorbidities. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were evaluated. Outcomes were defined as primary patency (time elapsed from graft creation until it was utilized as the patient's primary access), primary-assisted patency (time from primary access to intervention to maintain patency), and functional patency (time from graft placement until graft failure). Additionally, multinomial regression models were used to evaluate associations with categorical number of required interventions. Ninety-eight patients [mean age 61.8 (13.9) years, 42.9% female] were identified as having brachial artery to brachial vein AVG creation during the study period, of which 75% achieved primary patency. Primary-assisted patency was 0.36 [standard error (SE) 0.07] at 6months and 0.12 (SE 0.05) at 1year. Functional patency was 0.75 (SE 0.07) at 6months and 0.43 (SE 0.09) at 1year. No association between preoperative vessel diameters and primary-assisted or functional patency was observed. Interestingly, there was a significant negative association between previous ipsilateral access and achievement of primary patency with a 60% decrease in odds of achieving primary patency in patients with previous ipsilateral access [odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.9, P=0.03]. There was also noted to be a significant association between the presence of an ipsilateral catheter and increased risk of subsequent abandonment of the AVG (hazard ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-5.8, P=0.02). Prosthetic forearm loop AVGs remain hindered in their utility as they show high rates of graft failure within a year of creation. A significant patient-specific factor leading to this was not clearly demonstrated. As guidelines change regarding the nature of dialysis access for patients on HD, these results draw into question the utility of prosthetic forearm loop grafts in patients requiring long-term HD access.

A Single Center Experience With Forearm Arteriovenous Loop Grafts For Hemodialysis

<h3>OBJECTIVES</h3> Autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains the standard of care for hemodialysis (HD) access, however, it cannot be reasonably obtained in all patients. For patients with contraindications to AVFs, prosthetic arteriovenous graft (AVG) remains an alternative. AVGs are plagued by high failure rates, however, there is a paucity of literature examining this. This study aims to examine a single-center review of outcomes of forearm loop AVGs in patients requiring HD access. <h3>METHODS</h3> A single institution, retrospective chart review was completed from 2012-2019, including patient demographics, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) etiology, brachial artery and vein diameters, and comorbidities. Logistic regression and cox proportional hazard models were evaluated. Outcomes were defined as length of primary patency (time from graft placement to intervention to maintain patency) and secondary patency (time from graft placement until graft failure despite intervention). <h3>RESULTS</h3> 98 patients [mean age 61.8(13.9) years, 42.9% female] were identified as having brachial artery to brachial vein AVG creation during the study period. Primary patency was 0.36 (SE 0.07) at six months, 0.12 (0.05) at one year. Secondary patency was 0.75 (0.07) at six months and 0.43 (0.09) at one year (see figure 1 below). No association between preoperative vessel diameters and primary or secondary patency was observed. <h3>CONCLUSION</h3> Prosthetic forearm loop AVGs remain hindered in their utility as they show high rates of graft failure within a year of creation. A significant patient-specific factor leading to this was not clearly demonstrated. As guidelines change regarding the nature of dialysis access for patients on HD, these results draw into question the utility of prosthetic forearm loop grafts in patients requiring long-term HD access.

The Impact of Seasonality on Prosthetic Arteriovenous Vascular Access Graft Thrombosis

Highlights Abstract Introduction: Arteriovenous prosthetic grafts are susceptible to recurrent thrombotic occlusions mainly due to venous outflow disease secondary to neointimal hyperplasia. Maintenance of vascular access for dialysis is a perpetual challenge for both patients and health care systems. In regions with hotter climates, there is a clinical impression that episodes of prosthetic arteriovenous vascular access graft thrombosis are more frequent during hot dry summers secondary to dehydration and increased blood viscosity. Seasonality of thrombotic events has been observed in multiple vascular beds. However, a seasonal pattern or any association of arteriovenous graft thrombosis with temperature and relative humidity levels has never been fully demonstrated. Methods: Data were collected prospectively from January 2014 until December 2020 but analyzed retrospectively. In this 7-year timeframe, 289 episodes of arteriovenous graft thrombosis were identified from 142 grafts fashioned. Results: No monthly variation (P = 0.35) or seasonal variation (P = 0.91) was identified. No statistically significant correlation between episodes of thrombosis and mean monthly temperature and mean relative humidity was noted. Conclusion: No evidence was identified to support this theory. However, multiple issues with assessments of events must be conceded. Graft thrombosis is multifactorial in nature, and venous outflow disease contributes toward a significant number of these events. Within our local cohort, a low primary patency rate was identified, which further contributes to graft interventions. Relatively small numbers were recruited, and therefore, potential correlations could have been missed.

Upper thigh loop prosthetic arterio-venous grafts (AVG) for dialysis access: An Indian perspective.

Hemodialysis forms the most common replacement therapy for majority of Indians suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Multiple access failure and central vein stenosis has become commonplace in Indian dialysis access patients and there is a burgeoning need for more advanced hemodialysis (HD) access options. Upper thigh arterio-venous grafts (AVG) are seldom inserted due to fear of infection and limb ischemia. This is a single institutional, retrospective, descriptive case study of consecutive patients who underwent upper thigh prosthetic AVG over a period of 7 years. All these patients had exhausted options of upper limb access and or had central vein stenosis. AVG from the proximal superficial femoral artery (SFA) to the proximal great saphenous vein (GSV) in a loop configuration using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) was carried out in the upper thigh. A total of 24 patients had undergone upper thigh loop AVG. Their age varied from 24 to 77 years. The median follow-up period was 3 years. Five of these grafts developed infection (21%) which led to primary failure. A primary patency of 71% (17/24 patients) was achieved at 1 year. Thrombosis developed at a mean of 16.7 months after the primary procedure. Adjunctive procedures such as thrombectomy, segmental replacement of graft, patch angioplasty, balloon angioplasty, and stenting were required in 75% of patients to achieve a secondary patency of 86% at 1 year. Three grafts were explanted without limb loss. Upper thigh loop AVG forms a reliable alternate dialysis access option for patients with failed upper limb access sites or central vein occlusion. Adjunctive procedures are key to maintaining patency in these grafts. Good secondary patency is achievable, and the infection rates are similar to arm AVG. Close follow-up and timely intervention are key to long term dialysis through these grafts.

Mid-term cumulative patency of fistula and PTFE grafts among hemodialysis patients: A retrospective, single-center study from Palestine.

Due to the long waiting time for kidney transplantation, most End-Stage renal disease patients are commenced on either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Reusable fistulas have the lowest risk for death, cardiovascular events, and infections among all vascular accesses. This study aims to report the outcomes of the arteriovenous fistulas and PTFE grafts and the related predictive clinical and demographic variables. This retrospective study reviewed the charts of all hemodialysis patients between January 2017 and January 2021 at the Dialysis Center of An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, Palestine. Our outcomes were a primary failure, primary and secondary patency, and the related factors. Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method was conducted, and the log-rank test was used to compare patency rates. The Cox proportional hazards regression model tested factors relevant to primary and secondary patency rates in univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 312 procedures were performed during the study period. Primary failure was 7.1% for AVF, 13.9% for arterio-venous graft (AVG) procedures. Peripheral arterial disease and left-sided AVF were associated with more primary failure rates. AVF, primary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 82%, 69%, and 59%, respectively, while secondary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 85%, 72%, and 63%, respectively. Factors associated with increased AVF patency in a proportional hazard model were younger age and dual antiplatelet administration. Our study adds further evidence that autogenous AVF has better results than prosthetic AVG in both primary and secondary patency rates as well as less primary failure rates. Therefore, we encourage further longitudinal studies that assess the benefits of using antiplatelet on AVF outcome versus risks of bleeding, especially with dual agents.

Medical adjuvant treatment to increase patency of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts.

People with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) often require either the formation ofan arteriovenousfistula (AVF) or an interposition prostheticarteriovenousgraft (AVG) for haemodialysis. These access sites should ideally have a long life and a low rate of complications (e.g. thrombosis, infection, stenosis, aneurysm formation and distal limb ischaemia). Although some of the complications may be unavoidable, any adjuvant technique or medical treatment aimed at decreasing complications would be welcome. This is the fourth update of the review first published in 2003. To assess the effects of adjuvant drug treatment in people with ESRD on haemodialysis via autologous AVFs or prosthetic interposition AVGs. The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases and ClinicalTrials.gov trials register to 6 August 2020. Randomised controlled trials of active drug versus placebo in people with ESRD undergoing haemodialysis via an AVF or prosthetic interposition AVG. For this update, two review authors (IM, MFAK) independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and assessed the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE. We resolved disagreements by discussion or consultation with another review author (ADS). The primary outcome was the long-term fistula or graft patency rate. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospital stay; complications such as infection, aneurysm formation, stenosis and distal limb ischaemia; and number of related surgical or radiological interventions. For this update, one additional study was suitable for inclusion, making a total of 13trials with 2080 participants. Overall the certainty of the evidence was low or moderate due to short follow-up periods, heterogeneity between trials, small sample sizes, and risk of bias due to incomplete reporting. Medical adjuvant treatments used in the included trials were aspirin, ticlopidine, dipyridamole, dipyridamole plus aspirin, warfarin, fish oil, clopidogrel, sulphinpyrazone and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) patch. All included studies reported on graft patency by measuring graft thrombosis. There was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in graft patency in studies comparing aspirin versus placebo (odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 2.25; 3 studies, 175 participants; low-certainty evidence). The meta-analysis for graft patency comparing ticlopidine versus placebo favoured ticlopidine (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.82; 3 studies, 339 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in graft patency in studies comparing fish oil versus placebo (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.95; 2 studies, 220 participants; low-certainty evidence); and studies comparing clopidogrel and placebo (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.19; 2 studies, 959 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Similarly, there was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in graft patency comparing the effect of dipyridamole versus placebo (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.94; 1 study, 42 participants, moderate-certainty evidence) and dipyridamole plus aspirin versus placebo (OR 0.64, CI 0.16 to 2.56; 1 study, 41 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); comparing low-intensity warfarin with placebo (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.78 to 3.99; 1 study, 107 participants; low-certainty evidence); comparing sulphinpyrazone versus placebo (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.03 to 5.98; 1 study, 16 participants; low-certainty evidence) and comparing GTN patch and placebo (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.54; 1 study, 167 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The single trial evaluating warfarin was terminated early because of major bleeding events in the warfarin group. Only two studies published data on the secondary outcome of related interventions (surgical or radiological); there was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in related interventions between placebo and treatment groups. None of the included studies reported on the duration of hospital stay. Most studies reported complications ranging from mortality to nausea. However, data on complications were limited and reporting varied between studies. The meta-analyses of three studies for ticlopidine (an antiplatelet treatment), which all used the same dose of treatment but with a short follow-up of only one month, suggest ticlopidine may have a beneficial effect as an adjuvant treatment to increase the patency of AVFs and AVGs in the short term. There was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in graft patency between placebo and other treatments such as aspirin, fish oil, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, dipyridamole plus aspirin, warfarin,sulphinpyrazone and GTN patch. The certainty of the evidence was low to moderate due to short follow-up periods, the small number of studies for each comparison, small sample sizes, heterogeneity between trials and risk of bias due to incomplete reporting. Therefore, it appears reasonable to suggest further prospective studies be undertaken to assess the use of these antiplatelet drugs in renal patients with an AVF or AVG.

X-ray-guided and ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat arteriovenous fistula dysfunction in hemodialysis patients: A retrospective controlled study.

To compare the safety and efficacy of X-ray-guided and ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in treating arteriovenous fistula dysfunction. Data for 219 patients with arteriovenous fistula dysfunction between January 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were technical success, clinical success, and primary patency rates. The secondary endpoints were complications and secondary patency rates. Procedure outcomes and both endpoints were evaluated by propensity score analysis. After the propensity score matching, 73 matched pairs of cases were created with 34 pairs of autogenous arteriovenous fistula cases and 39 pairs of prosthetic arteriovenous graft cases. There was no significant difference between the X-ray-guided and ultrasound-guided group, respectively, regarding the technical success rate (84.9% vs 87.7%, p = 0.630), clinical success rate (98.6% vs 97.3%, p = 0.999), and complications (10.9% vs 5.5%, p = 0.228). Although the 6- and 12-month secondary patency rates for the dialysis access between the two groups had significant difference (p < 0.05), there was no significant difference in primary and secondary patency curves between the two groups (p > 0.05). The overall efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus X-ray-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in treating arteriovenous fistula dysfunction might be comparable.

Outcome of prosthetic arteriovenous graft in lower limb for hemodialysis: A series of 10 patients

Background: The burden of chronic kidney disease and the incidence of end-stage renal disease in India are continuously increasing. For each of these patients, adequate vascular access for dialysis is essential for survival. Access to patients' blood can come in the form of a catheter, native arteriovenous fistula (AVF), or prosthetic graft. It is apparent that the number of new “incident” patients and “prevalent” patients will continue to increase, requiring stable forms of vascular access. An alternative to autologous AVF is placement of a synthetic vascular graft prosthesis. Methods: This is a retrospective study which aims to evaluate the outcome of 10 consecutive patients with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) made for hemodialysis in patients with exhaustive veins/failed AVFs with central venous catheters (CVCs) in situ. Results: The mean age of patients in our study was 54 years. The primary patency rate of AVGs was 50% and 30%, whereas the secondary patency rate was found to be 80% and 60% at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. Conclusion: AVGs can be used as an alternative to AVFs with acceptable results.

Inferiority of arteriovenous grafts, in comparison to autogenous fistulas, is underestimated by standard survival measures alone.

It has been argued that a prosthetic arteriovenous graft (AVG) is a reasonable alternative to an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for dialysis. We aimed to compare the patency rates and requirements for the intervention of newly formed AVF and AVG. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of AVF and AVG formed between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015 at two tertiary referral centres and followed up until 31 December 2017. Outcome measures included successful use for dialysis, patency rates and the number of interventions required to maintain dialysis access per patient-year (PPY). Four hundred and seventy AVF and 92 AVG were constructed. Of 470 AVF, 324 (68.9%) were used compared to 80 of 92 (87%) AVG. One year assisted primary patency of AVF was 75% (confidence interval 71-79%) compared to 47% (confidence interval 36-57%) for AVG. Secondary patency rates for AVF at 1, 2 and 3 years were 77%, 71% and 69%, respectively. At the same time points, secondary patency rates for AVG were 77%, 60% and 46%, respectively (log rank P = 0.034). AVG required 2.4 times the number of interventions PPY than AVF. Surgical thrombectomy of AVG was at a rate of 0.49 PPY compared with 0.042 PPY for AVF. AVG have a substantially higher rate of thrombosis than AVF, evident from early in the life of the graft. AVF demonstrate superior patency rates to AVG throughout the life of the access, with far fewer interventions PPY than grafts.

Comparing Outcomes of Upper Extremity Brachiobasilic Arteriovenous Fistulas and Arteriovenous Grafts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

It is unclear what the optimal upper extremity hemodialysis access is for patients without a suitable cephalic vein for arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes for upper extremity transposed brachiobasilic AVFs (BBAVFs) and prosthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). A systematic review was performed to identify all English publications and abstracts comparing the patency outcomes of upper extremity BBAVFs and AVGs (January 1st, 1994 to April 1st, 2020). The outcomes assessed were 1-year and 2-year primary and secondary patency rates. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the random-effects model, and I2 statistic was used to assess between-study variability. Twenty-three studies examining 2799 patients were identified and included in the study. The 1-year primary patency rates (OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.24-2.28, p = 0.001, I2 = 69.40%) and 2-year primary patency rates (OR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.59-3.43, p < 0.001, I2 = 68.26%) were significantly better for BBAVFs than AVGs. Compared to AVGs, the 1-year secondary patency rates (OR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.05-1.98, p = 0.022, I2 = 56.64%) and 2-year secondary patency rates (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.39-2.68, p < 0.001, I2 = 57.61%) were also significantly higher for BBAVFs. The outcomes for upper extremity BBAVFs appear to be consistently superior to prosthetic hemodialysis access. This analysis supports the preferential placement of BBAVFs over AVGs in patients with a suitable upper extremity basilic vein.

The safety of bovine tissue arterial repair in removal of infected prosthetic hemodialysis grafts.

More than 400,000 Americans require dialysis, and many receive it via a prosthetic arteriovenous graft. Infection of these grafts is rare, but associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The gold standard is total graft excision with arteriotomy closure. This was previously done with autologous vein, but bovine tissue offers a reasonable alternative. The objective of this article is to evaluate a community hospital experience with bovine tissue arterial repair after total graft excision of infected prosthetic arteriovenous graft. A retrospective review was performed of all cases of infected prosthetic arteriovenous graft removal with bovine tissue arterial repair was performed. Thirteen cases were identified. Presentation, location of graft, and causative organism were reviewed; outcomes including reoperation and mortality were recorded. Of the 13 patients, 12 (92%) had positive cultures of the graft, bloodstream, or wound. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated organism (54%). There were two unplanned reoperations including hematoma drainage and wound debridement within the first year. Over the 1-year follow-up period, 1 patient died for a mortality of 8%. There were no re-infections during follow-up. Prosthetic arteriovenous graft infection remains a difficult challenge and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It presents in a variety of ways, including within an old thrombosed graft. Over the last several years, the causative organism has increasingly become drug resistant. Treatment with total graft excision requires arteriotomy closure, and for this bovine tissue has been demonstrated to be a viable option.

Intravenous Drug Use History Is Not Associated With Poorer Outcomes After Arteriovenous Access Creation

Rising intravenous drug use (IVDU) paralleled with an increasing dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease population may pose a challenge for creating and maintaining arteriovenous (AV) access for hemodialysis. We aimed to elucidate baseline characteristics and outcomes of AV access creation in the IVDU population. The Vascular Quality Initiative national database (2011-2018) was queried for patients undergoing AV access placement. Univariable and multivariable analyses comparing outcomes among patients with and without IVDU history were performed. Among 33,404 patients undergoing AV access creation, 601 (1.8%) had IVDU history—21.8% current and 78.2% past users. IVDU patients receiving AV access were more often younger, male, nonwhite, smokers, homeless, Medicaid recipients, and hospitalized at the time of surgery (P < .001 for all). They exhibited higher rates of congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (P < .05 for all). They more frequently had tunneled catheters at the time of access creation (53.6% vs 42%; P < .001) and had a previous AV access (25.3% vs 21.7%; P = .002). IVDU patients more often received prosthetic AV grafts (28.6% vs 18%; P < .001) and more often had anastomoses created to basilic veins (33.1% vs 23.2%; P < .001) but less often to cephalic veins (36.8% vs 57.7%; P < .001). IVDU patients had longer postoperative length of stay (2 ± 6 days vs 0.9 ± 5 days; P < .001) but no significant difference in 30-day mortality (1.7% vs 1.2%; P = .3). Comparing IVDU vs no IVDU cohorts, 6-month access infection-free survival (91.4% vs 92.9%; P = .38), 6-month endovascular/open reintervention-free survival (73.3% vs 70.8%; P = .71), and 1-year postoperative survival (93.8% vs 93.7%; P = .64) were similar. On multivariable analysis, IVDU was independently associated with postoperative length of stay ≥1 day (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2; P < .001) but not with 30-day mortality or 6-month infection-free survival, 6-month reintervention-free survival, or 1-year all-cause mortality. IVDU history was not independently associated with major morbidity or mortality after AV access creation. IVDU patients more often received grafts and anastomoses to proximal arm veins. As these patients have more frequent comorbidities and socioeconomic vulnerability, surgeons may consider coordinating care with other medical and nonmedical providers. However, IVDU history alone should not preclude AV access creation.

Surgical intervention for upper extremity nerve compression related to arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses.

Objective:Chronic renal failure patients with arteriovenous hemodialysis access may exhibit pain and neurological complaints due to local nerve compression by the access conduit vessels of autogenous arteriovenous fistulas or the prosthesis of arteriovenous grafts. In this study, we have examined the results of surgical intervention for vascular access–related nerve compression in the upper extremity.Methods:A single center retrospective study was performed of all patients referred for persistent pain and neurological complaints after vascular access surgery for hemodialysis. There were four brachial-cephalic, three brachial-basilic upper arm arteriovenous fistulas, and three prosthetic arteriovenous grafts. All patients had pain and sensory deficits in a distinct nerve territory (median nerve: 6; median + ulnar nerve: 1; medial cutaneous nerve: 1), and two patients had additional motor deficits (median nerve).Results:A total of 10 patients (mean age: 59 years; range: 25–73 years; 2 men; 4 diabetics) were treated by surgical nerve release alone (2 patients) or in combination with access revision (8 patients). Mean follow-up was 23 months (range: 8–46 months). Direct complete relief of symptoms was achieved in six patients. Three patients had minor complaints, and one patient had a reoperation with good success.Conclusion:Vascular access–related nerve compression is an uncommon cause for pain, sensory and motor deficits after vascular access surgery. Surgical nerve release and access revision have good clinical outcome with relief of symptoms and maintenance of the access site in the majority of patients.

Intravenous drug use history is not associated with poorer outcomes after arteriovenous access creation

ObjectiveRising intravenous drug use (IVDU) paralleled with an increasing dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease population may pose a challenge for creating and maintaining arteriovenous (AV) access for hemodialysis. We aimed to elucidate baseline characteristics and outcomes of AV access creation in the IVDU population. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative (2011-2018) was queried for patients undergoing AV access placement. Univariable and multivariable analyses comparing outcomes of patients with and without IVDU history were performed. ResultsOf 33,404 patients undergoing AV access creation, 601 (1.8%) had IVDU history (21.8% current and 78.2% past users). IVDU patients receiving AV access were more often younger, male, nonwhite, smokers, homeless, Medicaid recipients, and hospitalized at the time of surgery (P < .001 for all). They exhibited higher rates of congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (P < .05 for all). They more frequently had tunneled catheters at the time of access creation (53.6% vs 42%; P < .001) and had a previous AV access (25.3% vs 21.7%; P = .002). IVDU patients more often received prosthetic AV grafts (28.6% vs 18%; P < .001) and more often had anastomoses created to basilic veins (33.1% vs 23.2%; P < .001) but less often to cephalic veins (36.8% vs 57.7%; P < .001). IVDU patients had longer postoperative length of stay (2 ± 6 days vs 0.9 ± 5 days; P < .001) but no significant difference in 30-day mortality (1.7% vs 1.2%; P = .3). Comparing IVDU vs no IVDU cohorts, 1-year access infection-free survival (85.4% vs 86.6%; P = .382), primary patency loss-free survival (39.5% vs 37.9%; P = .335), endovascular/open reintervention-free survival (58% vs 57%; P = .705), and overall survival (89.7% vs 88.9%; P = .635) were similar. On multivariable analysis, IVDU was independently associated with postoperative length of stay (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2; P < .001) but not with 30-day mortality or 1-year infection-free survival, primary patency loss-free survival, reintervention-free survival, and all-cause mortality. The null results were confirmed in a propensity score-matched cohort. ConclusionsIVDU history was uncommon among patients undergoing AV access creation at Vascular Quality Initiative centers and was not independently associated with major morbidity or mortality postoperatively. IVDU patients more often received grafts or autogenous access with anastomoses to basilic veins. Although these patients frequently have more comorbidities, IVDU should not deter AV access creation.

Single-stage basilic vein transposition-An effective and viable autogenous access for dialysis.

The National Kidney Foundation's/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative recommends autogenous arteriovenous fistulas as the preferred method for long-term hemodialysis access. Basilic vein transposition is not only an alternative in patients with failed arteriovenous access but also can be the first option for arteriovenous access in patients with inadequate cephalic vein. Several studies have shown better patency rates, cost-effectiveness, and fewer complications of autogenous access over prosthetic arteriovenous grafts. To analyze patency, complication rates, and outcomes of single-stage basilic vein transposition. A single-center retrospective non-randomized study conducted at Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Bangalore from July 2015 to June 2018. A total of 94 consented patients who underwent single-stage basilic vein transposition were included in the study. All the surgeries were done in a single stage under regional anesthesia. All the complications and patency rates were calculated at the end of one year. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test, and patency rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meir survival curve. A total of 94 single-stage basilic vein transposition was performed. Fifty-four patients had a previous failed autogenous access and 40 had either absent or thrombosed cephalic vein. The mean age was 56.6 years with 59.57% males. The mean basilic vein and brachial artery diameter was 3.6 and 3.8 mm, respectively. The primary patency rate at one year was 84%. Edema and thrombosis were the most common complication in our study. Single-stage basilic vein transposition is a feasible surgical option in end-stage renal disease patients and provides durable autogenous access with very reasonable outcomes in terms of complication rates and patency rates.

A rat arteriovenous graft model using decellularized vein.

The high rate of clinical failure of prosthetic arteriovenous grafts continues to suggest the need for novel tissue-engineered vascular grafts. We tested the hypothesis that the decellularized rat jugular vein could be successfully used as a conduit and that it would support reendothelialization as well as adaptation to the arterial environment. Autologous (control) or heterologous decellularized jugular vein (1 cm length, 1 mm diameter) was sewn between the inferior vena cava and aorta as an arteriovenous graft in Wistar rats. Rats were sacrificed on postoperative day 21 for examination. All rats survived, and grafts had 100% patency in both the control and decellularized groups. Both control and decellularized jugular vein grafts showed similar rates of reendothelialization, smooth muscle cell deposition, macrophage infiltration, and cell turnover. The outflow veins distal to the grafts showed similar adaptation to the arteriovenous flow. Both CD34, CD90 and nestin positive cells, as well as M1-type and M2-type macrophages accumulated around the graft. This model shows that decellularized vein can be successfully used as an arteriovenous graft between the rat aorta and the inferior vena cava. Several types of cells, including progenitor cells and macrophages, are present in the host response to these grafts in this model. This model can be used to test the application of arteriovenous grafts before conducting large animal experiments.