Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Research Articles

Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review assessing treatment options from the interventional radiologist’s perspective.

It is estimated that 35-40% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients present with multiple nodules at the time of diagnosis. Treating multifocal disease is difficult given patient population heterogeneity. Multiple interventional radiological (IR) options, including ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE), are available, each with its own merits and limitations. Our aim is to explore the current state of the literature to identify where each of these options is best applied to multifocal HCC management. A narrative literature review of 107 papers was performed in PubMed. Articles from 2010 and newer were used for clinical data and for classification/scoring system details. The majority of the keywords for searches include the treatment modality name alongside terms such as "HCC", "multifocal", or "multinodular". Ablation is a curative option for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) A disease and is appropriate when liver transplantation (LT) is impractical. It is ideal in disease with ?3 nodules (each <3 cm) preferably confined to one segment. TACE [conventional TACE (cTACE), drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), balloon-occluded TACE (B-TACE), and less so hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)] is the major workhorse for multifocal BCLC B disease, in pre-transplant downstaging, and in advanced disease palliation. The Kinki BCLC B subclassification can guide TACE subtype selection. TACE response can be assessed over 2-3 sessions per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and patient session tolerance. TARE is an option for BCLC C disease, with BCLC A/B applications limited by radiation induced liver disease (RILD). Pseudo-ablative techniques like sub-selective TARE (sTARE) are promising but are unproven and less useful in multinodular disease. Finally, combination therapies [TACE + ablation, liver resection (LR) + ablation/TACE] are an exciting option but warrant further study. Multifocal HCC remains challenging to manage. While BCLC is a useful starting point, the patient's tumor imaging characteristics and clinical circumstances must be considered when selecting the appropriate treatment modality.

Usefulness of tumor perfusion on cone-beam CT after hepatic arterial infusion port implantation for evaluating tumor response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

To compare tumor perfusion on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) after hepatic artery infusion port implantation with the tumor response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study was conducted in patients with advanced HCC treated with HAIC from 2015 to 2020. We performed CBCT with contrast injection via a port on the day following implantation. We classified tumor perfusion on CBCT into three groups: hyperperfusion, isoperfusion, and hypoperfusion. We also evaluated tumor response to HAIC on follow-up images using RECIST 1.1 and compared it with tumor perfusion on CBCT. This study included 206 tumors in 193 patients (mean: 60.5 years) with HCC. There were 100 hyperperfusion tumors (48.5%), 92 isoperfusion tumors (44.7%), and 14 hypoperfusion tumors (6.8%). The tumor response to HAIC included 10 tumors with a complete response (CR) (4.9%), 66 tumors with a partial response (32%), 60 tumors with stable disease (29.1%), and 70 tumors with progressive disease (34%). Hyperperfusion tumors had a 65% objective response rate (ORR) and a 92% disease control rate (DCR). Isoperfusion tumors had a 12% ORR and a 46.8% DCR, while hypoperfusion tumors had a 0% ORR and a 7.1% DCR. A CR was shown only in hyperperfusion tumors. The ORR and DCR of the three groups were different, with statistical significance (P < 0.001). Hyperperfusion tumors on CBCT showed a better tumor response to HAIC, with a 65% ORR in patients with HCC. Tumor perfusion on CBCT after implantation of the hepatic arterial infusion port was associated with the tumor response to HAIC.

Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Sequential Hepatic Artery Embolization Combined with Operation in the Treatment of Recurrent Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Achieved Pathological Complete Response: A Case Report

Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Sequential Hepatic Artery Embolization Combined with Operation in the Treatment of Recurrent Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Achieved Pathological Complete Response: A Case Report

Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.

The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC. A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM). In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0-17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8-18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3-35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9-9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0-9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0-15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8-14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively). Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles.

202P Comparison of liver injury after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

202P Comparison of liver injury after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Lenvatinib and Camrelizumab.

This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) treated with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with u-HCC who underwent HAIC combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab. Patients were stratified into two cohorts using the median NLR as the cutoff point. We then assessed treatment response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events in these patient groups. Between October 2020 and April 2022, a total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The overall cohort exhibited a median PFS of 7.9 months, while the median OS was not reached, and a median NLR of 3.46. Notably, the group with NLR<3.46 demonstrated significantly superior OS (not reached vs 9.6 months, p = 0.017) and PFS (18.3 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.0015) compared to the NLR≥3.46 group. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 400 ng/mL [hazard ratio (HR), 2.133; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.102-4.126; p = 0.024], Barcelona Clinical Hepatocellular Carcinoma (BCLC) stage C (HR, 2.319; 95% CI, 1.128-4.764; p = 0.022), and NLR ≥3.46 (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.239-4.494; p = 0.009) were identified as independent risk factors for OS. Additionally, multivariate analysis demonstrated that AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, BCLC stage C, and NLR ≥ 3.46 were independent negative factors of PFS. NLR can be associated with outcomes in patients with u-HCC treated with HAIC combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab.

The worthy role of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Systemic therapy remains the primary therapeutic approach for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nonetheless, its efficacy in achieving control of intrahepatic lesions is constrained. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a therapeutic approach that combines localized treatment with systemic antitumor effects, which aim is to effectively manage the progression of cancerous lesions within the liver, particularly in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Combining HAIC with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) immunotherapy is anticipated to emerge as a novel therapeutic approach aimed at augmenting the response inside the localized tumor site and achieving prolonged survival advantages. In order to assess the effectiveness, safety, and applicability of various therapeutic modalities and to address potential molecular mechanisms underlying the efficacy of HAIC-sensitizing immunotherapy, we reviewed the literature about the combination of HAIC with anti-PD-1 mAb therapies.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.

At present, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often applied to patients who are not suitable or are unwilling to undergo surgical treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HCC have not been fully demonstrated. Published studies involving the treatment of patients with HCC with HAIC, ICIs and TKIs were searched from public databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Sinomed. Efficacy and safety data for each study, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The present study included 17 treatment groups from 15 studies, including 1,987 patients with HCC in the systematic review. The target population was dominated by those unsuitable for surgical treatment, with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and Child-Pugh score A or B. The results showed that the longest estimated median PFS (95% CI) in the HAIC + ICI/TKI therapy group (group C) was 9.37 months (95% CI, 6.81-11.93); in the HAIC therapy group (group B) was 7.45 months (95% CI, 6.45-8.46); and in the ICIs + other systemic therapies group (group A) was 5.92 months (95% CI, 5.31-6.54). There was no significant difference in the expected OS among the three groups, which may be because OS events were not reached in numerous studies during the follow-up time. The incidence of treatment-related adverse effects, such as increased AST [14/221 (6.33%)], increased ALT [13/221 (5.88%)], and decreased platelet count [13/221 (5.88%)], was not significantly increased in group C when compared with groups A or B (P>0.05). In conclusion, the effectiveness of HAIC + ICI/TKI for the treatment of advanced HCC was better than that of ICIs + other systemic therapies or HAIC alone. In addition, the incidence of AEs above grade 3 was not significantly higher compared with that in the other treatment groups, and the safety profile was good.

Camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus apatinib (an VEGFR-2 inhibitor) and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (TRIPLET): a phase II study

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using a combination of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) has shown promise for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients classified under Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C. In China, the combined therapy of camrelizumab and apatinib is now an approved first-line approach for inoperable HCC. This study (NCT04191889) evaluated the benefit of combining camrelizumab and apatinib with HAIC-FOLFOX for HCC patients in BCLC stage C. Eligible patients were given a maximum of six cycles of HAIC-FOLFOX, along with camrelizumab and apatinib, until either disease progression or intolerable toxicities emerged. The primary outcome measured was the objective response rate (ORR) based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Based on RECIST v1.1 criteria, the confirmed ORR stood at 77.1% (95% CI: 59.9% to 89.6%), with a disease control rate of 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1% to 99.9%). The median progression-free survival was 10.38 months (95% CI: 7.79 to 12.45). Patient quality of life had a transient deterioration within four cycles of treatment, and generally recovered thereafter. The most frequent grade ≥3 or above treatment-related adverse events included reduced lymphocyte count (37.1%) and diminished neutrophil count (34.3%). The combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and HAIC demonstrated encouraging results and manageable safety concerns for HCC at BCLC stage C.

Case-Based Clinical Guidance on Dosing and Management of the Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Pump.

Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) delivers localized high-dose floxuridine directly to liver tumors through an implanted pump. While patients are undergoing active treatment, the pump is refilled with chemotherapy alternating with saline every 2 weeks using a specialized noncoring needle. Numerous clinical scenarios influence the dosing of floxuridine, which do not conform to the usual dose modification schema for systemic chemotherapy. This article aims to provide practical clinical management solutions to overcome the common challenges faced by oncologists in the real-world management of HAI pump therapy.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed versus oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

BackgroundHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated promising benefits in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In China, the most frequently used HAIC regimen is oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). However, arterial infusion of fluorouracil over 46 h was not convenient. Raltitrexed, another antimetabolic agent with a long plasma half-life, allows for shorter infusion durations. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with HAIC with raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin (RALOX) or FOLFOX in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC. MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 82 eligible patients from February 2019 to December 2021. Forty patients were treated with FOLFOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 administered on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 infusion for 46 h, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. Forty-two patients received RALOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. ResultsORR was similar between the FOLFOX HAIC and RALOX HAIC groups (42.5% vs 42.5%, P = 0.974). DCR also showed no significant difference between the two groups (87.5% vs 85.7%, P = 0.813). Median PFS was 10.7 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group versus 10.2 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.41). Median OS was 20.3 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group, compared to 17.7 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.50). Both groups had similar profiles of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events, including thrombocytopenia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, and leukocytopenia. ConclusionThe effectiveness and safety of HAIC with RALOX were comparable to HAIC with FOLFOX in intermediate and advanced HCC patients.

Arterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: consensus recommendations.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment is widely accepted as one of the alternative therapeutic modalities for HCC owing to its local control effect and low systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, although accumulating high-quality evidence has displayed the superior survival advantages of HAIC of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX) compared with standard first-line treatment in different scenarios, the lack of standardization for HAIC procedure and remained controversy limited the proper and safe performance of HAIC treatment in HCC. Therefore, an expert consensus conference was held on March 2023 in Guangzhou, China to review current practices regarding HAIC treatment in patients with HCC and develop widely accepted statements and recommendations. In this article, the latest evidence of HAIC was systematically summarized and the final 22 expert recommendations were proposed, which incorporate the assessment of candidates for HAIC treatment, procedural technique details, therapeutic outcomes, the HAIC-related complications and corresponding treatments, and therapeutic scheme management.

Triple combination of HAIC-FO plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The triple combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is expected to have a synergistic anticancer effect in HCC. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination treatment in advanced HCC patients. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant studies from the inception of each database to May 10, 2023. All articles focusing the triple combination treatment of HAIC-FO plus TKI and ICIs for advanced HCC were eligible. The meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for case series and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary results were adverse events. Further meta-analysis of control studies demonstrated the superiority of the triple combination modality to TKI plus ICIs, and TKI alone. Nine articles (four cohort studies and five one-arm studies) involving 777 advanced HCC patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of survival analysis, the pooled median PFS was 11 months (95% CI: 10.1-12.0 months) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.97). With regard to tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR was 61.6% (I2=0%, p = 0.71) and 87.9% (I2 = 13%, p = 0.33) with low heterogeneity, respectively. As compared with TKIs plus ICIs, and TKIs alone, the triple combination thrapy was associated with improved median OS (HR=0.51, 95%CI 0.41-0.62) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%, p = 0.47), median PFS (HR=0.51, 95%CI 0.41-0.64) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%, p = 0.41), ORR (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42-0.74) with high heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 69%, p = 0.02), and DCR (RR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.27-0.54) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 14%, p = 0.32). The most common 3/4 AEs were elevated ALT and AST, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, nausea and vomiting in this meta-analysis. The triple combination therapy of HAIC-FO plus TKI and ICIs showed promising efficacy and safety in patients with advanced HCC. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID:CRD42023424281).

Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters: a novel efficacy predictor of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) is a novel vascular pattern structurally and functionally distinct from microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to explore the prognostic value of VETC in patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for unresectable HCC. From January 2016 to December 2017, 145 patients receiving HAIC as the initial treatment for unresectable HCC were enrolled and stratified into two groups according to their VETC status. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: VETC+ (n = 31, 21.8%) and VETC- (n = 114, 78.2%). The patients in the VETC+ group had worse ORR and DCR than those in the VETC- group (RECIST: ORR: 25.8% vs. 47.4%, P = 0.031; DCR: 56.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007; mRECIST: ORR: 41.0% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.008; DCR: 56.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007). Patients with VETC+ had significantly shorter OS and PFS than those with VETC- (median OS: 10.2 vs. 21.6months, P < 0.001; median PFS: 3.3 vs. 7.2months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed VETC status as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.46-3.94; P = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.20-3.22; P = 0.007). VETC status correlates remarkably well with the tumor response and long-term survival in patients undergoing HAIC. It may be a promising efficacy predictor and help identify patients who will benefit from HAIC.

A multitask deep learning radiomics model for predicting the macrotrabecular-massive subtype and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

BackgroundThe macrotrabecular-massive (MTM) is a special subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which has commonly a dismal prognosis. This study aimed to develop a multitask deep learning radiomics (MDLR) model for predicting MTM and HCC patients’ prognosis after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).MethodsFrom June 2018 to March 2020, 158 eligible patients with HCC who underwent surgery were retrospectively enrolled in MTM related cohorts, and 752 HCC patients who underwent HAIC were included in HAIC related cohorts during the same period. DLR features were extracted from dual-phase (arterial phase and venous phase) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the entire liver region. Then, an MDLR model was used for the simultaneous prediction of the MTM subtype and patient prognosis after HAIC. The MDLR model for prognostic risk stratification incorporated DLR signatures, clinical variables and MTM subtype.FindingsThe predictive performance of the DLR model for the MTM subtype was 0.968 in the training cohort [TC], 0.912 in the internal test cohort [ITC] and 0.773 in the external test cohort [ETC], respectively. Multivariable analysis identified portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (p = 0.012), HAIC response (p < 0.001), HAIC sessions (p < 0.001) and MTM subtype (p < 0.001) as indicators of poor prognosis. After incorporating DLR signatures, the MDLR model yielded the best performance among all models (AUC, 0.855 in the TC, 0.805 in the ITC and 0.792 in the ETC). With these variables, the MDLR model provided two risk strata for overall survival (OS) in the TC: low risk (5-year OS, 44.9%) and high risk (5-year OS, 4.9%).InterpretationA tool based on MDLR was developed to consider that the MTM is an important prognosis factor for HCC patients. MDLR showed outstanding performance for the prognostic risk stratification of HCC patients who underwent HAIC and may help physicians with therapeutic decision making and surveillance strategy selection in clinical practice.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibodies with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy or Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-PD-1 antibodies with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has shown encouraging anti-tumor effects in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We explored the efficacy and safety of TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with HAIC or TACE in HCC. Data from 302 HCC patients receiving HAIC combined with TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies (HAIC-TP group) and 446 HCC patients receiving TACE combined with TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies (TACE-TP group) were retrospectively collected. Clinicopathological characteristics, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize bias. The HAIC-TP group exhibited better objective response rate (RECIST: 33.1% versus 7.8%, P < 0.001; mRECIST: 51.4% versus 17.5%, P < 0.001), longer PFS (12.4 months versus 8.2 months, P < 0.001), and longer OS (not reached versus 13.8 months, P < 0.001) than TACE-TP group. Surgery was performed after combination therapy in 34 patients of the HAIC-TP group and in 7 patients of the TACE-TP group (P < 0.001). Similar results were also observed in the PSM analysis. Multivariate analysis indicated type of treatment, alpha-fetoprotein, ALBI grade, portal vein tumor thrombus, and extrahepatic status were risk factors for poor prognosis. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain occurred more frequently in the HAIC-TP group, whereas liver dysfunction occurred more frequently in the TACE-TP group. All AEs were acceptable and manageable as a result of treatment interruption or dose modification. The combination of HAIC with TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies is an effective and safe therapeutic regimen over TACE-based combination therapy for patients with HCC. A prospective study with a large sample size is required to validate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy.

999P Donafenib combined with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sintilimab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A prospective, single-arm phase II trial (DoHAICs study)

999P Donafenib combined with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sintilimab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A prospective, single-arm phase II trial (DoHAICs study)

600P Effectiveness and safety of rectal arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with anti-PD1 antibody for microsatellite stable locally advanced rectal cancer: Early outcome report of a two-stage, single armed, phase II study (RAIC)

600P Effectiveness and safety of rectal arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with anti-PD1 antibody for microsatellite stable locally advanced rectal cancer: Early outcome report of a two-stage, single armed, phase II study (RAIC)

Increasing evidence for the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: time to consider a more effective approach

Increasing evidence for the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: time to consider a more effective approach

1005P Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden

1005P Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden