In the interview with artist Anna Boghiguian, the interviewer attempts to explore the relation the artist holds to the world around her in terms of both her lived experience and her methodology. The introduction by the interviewer as well as the interview delineate the major theoretical concerns present in Boghiguian's work as well as her extensive travels in relation to the work she has produced. Her position in relation to her work is discussed in the context of history where the opposition between the metaphysical and minimalism is explored. The contemporary moment and the nature of time are placed in relation to the historical work Boghiguian has produced on Constantine Cavafy and the illustrations provided to Tom Lamont's Siwa Door. ********** Interviewing Anna Boghiguian is a difficult task. Over the span of a couple of meetings in the Fall of 2000 1 recorded several hours of discussion with the artist, which were later on transcribed. However, due to the relaxed nature of oral conversation, a lot of digression occurred; thus it was necessary for me to streamline the text into a consistent and focused dialogue through a process of extensive editing, which was later passed on to her for approval. In my encounters with Anna Boghiguian I have attempted to uncover the relation she holds to the world around her. The artist's biography, her lived experience, is related to a discussion of the nature and meaning of her work. Rather than claim neutrality in my questions, I propose to present a discursive reading of Boghiguian's work in this introductory note, providing a context for these encounters. Although Boghiguian's work functions outside constructed critical polarities such as the division between the real and the symbolic or the lyrical and the epic--which is at best a fiction that nurtures the myth that art can act as a closed representation--one finds that these fictions can function as analytical tools in the pursuit of an alignment. This is an attempt at exploring the relationship between the enunciator and the enunciation, the position of the subject self, the self that speaks in relation to the discourse it produces. This is an invitation to view the work of an artist as a position; the process, as a relationship between two interdependent and fully valid voices: that of the artist and the world she functions within. It is my contention that it is necessary to approach the work of Anna Boghiguian with a sensitivity towards the position of the aesthetic in contemporary practice. It is common practice to view the aesthetic as either the ultimate aim of art--either a moment of transcendence which both justifies the existence of the work and is its essence, or an expression of a moral economy that neutralizes art and its relation to the world and thus a site of critique. In the contemporary world both positions have been fiercely debated; movements and counter-movements have utilized (and theorized) the aesthetic within different contexts. For Boghiguian the aesthetic remains an integral part of the experience; however, her recognition of the aesthetic is not merely a simple argument for the transcendent nature of art. Eschewing the naively beautiful, Anna's work--whether ephemeral paintings or the more brutal, and sculptural drawings--grounds itself upon the creation of a moment. The moment is significant because of its appearance at the nexus of history and lived experience. Personal experience is politicized in a process that transforms as it creates. Whether detailed vistas of city life, or Buddha wax masks, Boghiguian's work is loaded with the significance of the accretion of human culture. Finding inspiration in both long dead civilizations and the streets of the urban metropolis, i.e. in the moment as defined through cultural production, Boghiguian's work is an attempt at coming to terms with a contemporary world that has redefined the position of outside the practice of a conscious systematized appropriation of a representation of the cultural invisible, outside the religious. …