Young citizens growing up in different societies experience multiple socialization processes that help to shape their values and attitudes toward the political life of their societies. Gabriel Almond and G. Bingham Powell (1996, 47) have pointed out that “each community’s political culture exists uniquely in its own time and place. The attitudes and beliefs of its citizens are shaped by their personal experiences.” Yet across countries, common patterns of citizenship values have been identified. Dian Kiwan (2005, 38) has identified five broad conceptions of citizenship: “moral, legal, identity-based, participatory and cosmopolitan.” Michael Walzer (1994) distinguished between “thin” and “thick” conceptions of citizenship, with thin conceptions roughly equivalent to Kiwan’s moral and legal categories and thick conceptions covering the other three categories. Although Diemut Bubeck (1995) questioned the adequacy of Walzer’s conceptions, claiming that some conceptions of citizenship have both thin and thick components, Walzer’s categorization, nevertheless, provides a useful way of understanding the way citizens across societies view their political roles. Thin conceptions of citizenship can be characterized as rights based, concerned with status in the political community and providing a somewhat passive role for citizens, such as obeying laws and voting periodically. Thick conceptions of citizenship, however, have much higher expectations of citizens in terms of their virtues, their expected participation, and their performance in the community. Other writers on citizenship have expressed similar views, especially in relation to democratic citizenship (Barber 1984; Heater 2004). For example, in his historical review of citizenship, Heater showed that citizenship developed from formal, legal, and rights-based emphases to multiple and global citizenship, requiring commitments beyond state-defined duties and responsibilities. Terence McLaughlin’s (1992) notion of minimal and maximal citizenship also identifies four sets of thin and thick features in various areas of citizenship, that is, form and substance in citizenship identity; private and public in citizenship virtues; passive and active in political involvement; and closed and open in social prerequisites, with the former as a thin feature of citizenship and the latter as thick in the four respective citizenship areas.