O NE of the most widely accepted criteria for determining archaic forms in early Latin is the occurrence of a given form only at the ends of verses or cola.2 It is assumed that such limitation of position in the verse indicates that the form was retained because of its metrical convenience and that otherwise it would not have been used. This assumption, which seems entirely reasonable at first glance, has been fostered by several studies arbitrarily confined to certain words occurring exclusively or almost exclusively in such positions. At least one such study came to the conclusion that all words so limited in Plautus were either archaisms or new formations.3 This was a rash conclusion, especially since this study had considered only certain peculiar words occurring at ends of lines and not all words occurring here with equal regularity. Before undertaking an investigation of the position of words in Plautine verse, one should realize the difficulties which the poet faced in attempting to write Latin verse which should fulfil the requirements of Greek quantitative meter without doing too great violence to Latin regard for accent. That this was the task which the Roman poets set themselves seems obvious from a study of the differences between the Latin senarius and the Greek trimeter, and the data to
Read full abstract